广告
加载中

风暴中 娃哈哈的守与困

伯虎团队 2026-06-05 15:23
伯虎团队 2026/06/05 15:23

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章梳理了宗庆后去世后,宗馥莉接手掌权的娃哈哈近两年的发展现状,核心干货信息如下:

1. 业绩表现:2024年受宗庆后去世带来的情怀消费影响,娃哈哈营收突破700亿元,2025年实现5亿元增长,稳固在700亿元规模,纯净水市场份额从2023年的5.8%提升至2025年的16%,但2026年一季度增长大幅放缓,全国经销商发货仅完成任务的15%,千万元级大经销商销量同比下滑20%,普遍存在压货问题。

2. 内部管理:宗馥莉接班后管理层持续动荡,原宏胜集团四大核心业务板块的负责人全部离职,宏胜推进非生产业务外包,计划裁员30%,娃哈哈整体处于失序状态。

3. 产品问题:自2005年推出营养快线后,娃哈哈至今未打造出新的爆品,2024年底基本停止新品研发,重点布局的茶饮料竞争力较弱,增长缺乏动力。

本文披露的娃哈哈发展现状,能给快消领域品牌商带来多方面的参考干货,具体如下:

1. 用户行为层面:消费者不会轻易被品牌的负面舆论八卦影响购买决策,2025年娃哈哈深陷多起舆论风波,但销量并未出现大幅波动;同时情怀消费只能带来短期增长,无法支撑长期业绩,市场最终会回归产品本身。

2. 产品研发层面:持续打造爆品是品牌长期增长的核心,娃哈哈自2005年后没有推出新的拳头产品,停止新品研发直接导致后续销量下滑,足以证明新品迭代的重要性。

3. 品牌传承层面:创始人离场后的交接班如果引发内部动荡,会直接传导到市场端冲击业绩,品牌需要提前做好交接班的平稳过渡,避免内部失序影响渠道和消费者信心。

对于快消领域的卖家,本文可以梳理出不少风险提示和可借鉴经验,干货内容如下:

1. 风险提示:过度依赖情怀消费、停止新品研发的增长不具备可持续性,宗馥莉接手后给经销商定下50%的高增长目标,直接导致经销商普遍压货,2026年不少大经销商销量同比下滑20%,库存压力极大。

2. 机会层面:传统包装饮用水赛道仍有抢占份额的空间,娃哈哈的纯净水市场份额从2023年的5.8%提升到2026年一季度的16.63%,说明传统赛道仍有增长机会可以挖掘。

3. 可学习点:品牌内部管理动荡会直接影响渠道端业绩,卖家需要保持内部团队稳定,避免管理层变动冲击渠道信心,同时要持续推新,不能过度依赖老品压货走量。

本文关于娃哈哈和代工厂宏胜集团的动向,给快消生产工厂带来不少干货启示,具体如下:

1. 生产转型方向:当前宏胜集团正在推进非生产业务外包,将能动、物业、仓储、实验室四大非核心板块业务外包,计划裁员30%,可见越来越多生产企业选择轻资产运营,聚焦核心生产业务,这是生产端企业的重要转型方向。

2. 产品需求层面:快消市场对新品迭代的需求持续存在,娃哈哈因为停止新品研发导致业绩下滑,说明工厂需要主动配合品牌方跟进新品开发需求,不能只停留在老品生产阶段,才能维持稳定的订单量。

3. 风险应对层面:品牌方创始人交接班带来的管理动荡会传导到生产端,工厂需要提前预判品牌方的变动,及时调整自身生产和管理策略,降低业绩波动带来的风险。

本文梳理的头部快消品牌娃哈哈的发展现状,能帮助服务商明确行业痛点和业务机会,干货内容如下:

1. 核心客户痛点:一是家族品牌交接班过程中普遍存在管理动荡问题,娃哈哈接班后持续人事调整,内部失序直接导致渠道信心下滑、经销商压货、业绩大幅下滑,这是头部品牌传承阶段的核心痛点。二是老牌快消品牌普遍存在新品迭代乏力的问题,娃哈哈自2005年后再无爆品,停止研发后增长直接失速,这是老牌品牌的共性痛点。

2. 行业发展趋势:越来越多生产型企业开始将非核心业务外包,聚焦自身核心业务,这给To B类服务商带来了大量业务机会,物业、仓储、人力、实验室等板块的外包需求正在持续增长,服务商可以针对性拓展相关业务。

本文关于娃哈哈的渠道和销售数据,给快消相关零售平台带来不少参考干货,具体如下:

1. 流量运营参考:情怀类社会事件能带来短期流量爆发,宗庆后去世后,娃哈哈抖音官方旗舰店在未开播的情况下,销量就暴涨500%,平台可以抓住这类全民关注事件带来的流量契机,针对性调整相关品牌的流量倾斜,拉动平台整体业绩增长。

2. 合作风险规避:老牌品牌如果出现内部管理动荡、新品研发停滞的问题,很快就会传导到渠道端,出现压货、销量下滑的情况,平台和这类品牌合作时,需要提前关注品牌内部的稳定性,规避合作风险。

3. 招商方向参考:传统水饮赛道仍然有份额增长的空间,头部老牌品牌仍在积极抢占市场,平台可以重点关注这类传统赛道的头部品牌,争取优质的招商合作资源。

本文梳理的娃哈哈交接班后的发展现状,给快消产业和家族企业传承研究者提供了不少有价值的研究素材,干货如下:

1. 产业层面:老牌快消企业普遍面临增长瓶颈,娃哈哈2013年达到782亿元的营收高峰后,长期在460亿元左右徘徊,2024年借情怀消费重回700亿元巅峰,但依然面临新品断档、管理动荡的问题,千亿元营收目标尚未实现,这反映了老牌快消企业转型突破的共性困境。

2. 家族企业传承层面:创始人突然离场后的交接班会引发显著内部动荡,娃哈哈接班后持续人事调整,宏观胜核心高管离职,非核心业务外包裁员,内部失序直接导致业绩下滑,这是家族企业传承研究的典型新案例,也反映了国内家族企业传承阶段普遍面临的公司治理问题。

3. 渠道层面:当前老牌快消企业不合理的高增长目标,已经引发了严重的渠道库存问题,进一步加剧了业绩下滑,这也是快消产业值得深入研究的新问题。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines the development of Hangzhou Wahaha Group over the past two years, following founder Zong Qinghou’s passing and his daughter Kelly Zong Fuli taking the reins, with key findings as follows:

1. Performance: Driven by nostalgia consumption triggered by Zong Qinghou’s death, Wahaha’s revenue exceeded 70 billion yuan in 2024, and grew an additional 500 million yuan to maintain the 70 billion yuan scale in 2025. Its market share in the purified water segment jumped from 5.8% in 2023 to 16% in 2025. However, growth slowed sharply in Q1 2026: national distributor shipments only hit 15% of quarterly targets, large distributors with annual sales over 10 million yuan saw a 20% year-over-year sales drop, and excessive inventory is widespread across the channel.

2. Internal management: Leadership turmoil has persisted since Zong Fuli took over. All four heads of core business divisions at Hongsheng Group—Wahaha’s core production arm—have left the company. Hongsheng is currently outsourcing non-production operations and planning 30% headcount cuts, leaving the entire Wahaha group in a state of operational disarray.

3. Product issues: Wahaha has not launched a new blockbuster product since it debuted Nutrition Express in 2005. It essentially halted new product R&D by the end of 2024, and its high-priority tea beverage line lacks competitive strength, leaving the company with insufficient long-term growth drivers.

The development of Wahaha outlined in this article offers multiple key insights for FMCG brand owners, as detailed below:

1. Consumer behavior: Consumers rarely base purchase decisions on negative gossip about brands; even though Wahaha was mired in multiple public relations controversies in 2025, its sales did not experience a sharp decline. Meanwhile, nostalgia consumption only delivers short-term growth and cannot sustain long-term performance; the market ultimately rewards product quality and innovation.

2. Product R&D: Continuous development of hit products is the core of sustained long-term growth for brands. The fact that Wahaha has not launched a new flagship product after 2005 and halted new R&D directly led to its subsequent sales decline fully demonstrates the importance of ongoing product iteration.

3. Brand succession: If leadership transition after a founder’s departure triggers internal turmoil, it will directly impact market performance. Brands need to prepare in advance to ensure a smooth handover, and prevent internal disarray from damaging channel and consumer confidence.

For FMCG sellers, this article provides a range of risk warnings and actionable lessons, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Risk warnings: Growth built on overreliance on nostalgia consumption and halted new product R&D is unsustainable. After taking over, Zong Fuli set an aggressive 50% growth target for distributors, which directly led to widespread overstocking. By 2026, many large distributors recorded a 20% year-over-year sales drop and face extreme inventory pressure.

2. Growth opportunities: There is still room to gain market share in the traditional packaged water track. Wahaha’s purified water market share grew from 5.8% in 2023 to 16.63% in Q1 2026, proving that growth opportunities still exist in mature traditional categories.

3. Key lessons: Internal management turmoil at the brand level directly hits channel performance. Sellers should maintain internal team stability to avoid leadership changes eroding channel confidence, and should continuously roll out new products instead of relying excessively on pushing old products through overstocking to hit volume targets.

The updates on Wahaha and its contract manufacturing arm Hongsheng Group outlined in this article offer valuable insights for FMCG production factories, as detailed below:

1. Production transformation direction: Hongsheng is currently outsourcing non-production operations, including energy management, property management, warehousing and laboratory services, four non-core business segments, and planning 30% layoffs. This reflects a growing trend among manufacturing enterprises to adopt asset-light operations and refocus on core production, which is a key transformation direction for upstream production players.

2. Product demand: The FMCG market has sustained demand for continuous product iteration. Wahaha’s performance decline following its halt to new product R&D shows that factories need to proactively partner with brands to support new product development, rather than only producing legacy goods, in order to maintain stable order volumes.

3. Risk management: Leadership turmoil triggered by brand founder transition can ripple through to upstream production. Factories need to anticipate changes at their brand clients in advance, adjust their own production and management strategies in time, and mitigate risks from performance volatility.

The development of leading FMCG brand Wahaha outlined in this article helps service providers identify industry pain points and new business opportunities, with key insights as follows:

1. Core client pain points: First, leadership turmoil is a common issue during family brand succession. After Zong Fuli took over, ongoing personnel changes and internal disarray directly led to eroded channel confidence, distributor overstocking and sharp performance declines, which is a core pain point for leading brands navigating succession. Second, slow new product iteration is a widespread problem for legacy FMCG brands; Wahaha has had no new blockbusters since 2005, and growth stalled immediately after it halted R&D, which is a common pain point for established brands.

2. Industry development trend: A growing number of manufacturing enterprises are outsourcing non-core businesses to focus on their core operations. This creates abundant business opportunities for B2B service providers, as demand for outsourcing in property, warehousing, human resources and laboratory services continues to grow. Service providers can expand their business offerings to target this growing demand.

The channel and sales data for Wahaha in this article offers valuable reference for FMCG-related retail platforms, as detailed below:

1. Traffic operations reference: Nostalgia-driven public events can trigger short-term traffic spikes. After Zong Qinghou’s passing, sales at Wahaha’s official Douyin flagship store surged 500% even without any live streaming broadcasts. Platforms can capitalize on traffic opportunities from such widely followed public events, adjust traffic allocation for related brands to drive overall platform growth.

2. Cooperation risk mitigation: If a legacy brand faces internal management turmoil and halted new product R&D, these issues will quickly ripple through to the channel, leading to overstocking and sales declines. When partnering with such brands, platforms should monitor the brand’s internal stability in advance to mitigate cooperation risks.

3. Recruitment direction reference: There is still room for share growth in the traditional bottled beverage category, and leading legacy brands are still actively expanding market share. Platforms can prioritize these leading brands in traditional categories to secure high-quality partnership opportunities.

The development of Wahaha after its leadership transition outlined in this article provides valuable research material for scholars of the FMCG industry and family business succession, with key insights as follows:

1. Industry perspective: Established FMCG enterprises generally face growth bottlenecks. After reaching a peak revenue of 78.2 billion yuan in 2013, Wahaha’s revenue stagnated at around 46 billion yuan for years. It returned to the 70 billion yuan mark in 2024 driven by nostalgia consumption, but still faces challenges including a product gap and ongoing management turmoil. Its 100 billion yuan revenue target remains unmet, which reflects the common predicament of transformation and breakthrough for legacy FMCG enterprises.

2. Family business succession perspective: Succession after a founder’s sudden departure can trigger significant internal turmoil. Following the leadership handover at Wahaha, ongoing personnel adjustments, departures of core executives at Hongsheng, and outsourcing and layoffs of non-core businesses, plus internal disarray directly led to performance declines. This is a new typical case for family business succession research, and reflects common corporate governance challenges faced by Chinese family enterprises during the transition period.

3. Channel perspective: Unreasonably high growth targets set by established FMCG enterprises have already triggered severe channel inventory problems, which further exacerbates performance declines. This is a new issue worthy of in-depth research in the FMCG industry.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

来源 | 伯虎财经(bohuFN)

作者 | 林恩

2025年,对于娃哈哈来说,是稳中藏变的一年。

这一年,娃哈哈逆势增长。在经历风暴过后,看似风平浪静,实际上暗流涌动。

宗馥莉接手后,娃哈哈虽然没有迎来业绩下跌,却仍然无法高枕无忧。

“失序”状态中,700亿的娃哈哈,要走向何方?

娃哈哈逆势增长的两年

截至目前,娃哈哈2025年全年营收并未对外公布具体总额。但多家媒体披露,2025年娃哈哈收入实现了5亿元的增长,稳固在约700亿元的业绩规模,守住了近十年的业绩巅峰。

“逆势增长”,是外界对于娃哈哈2025年的发展评价。在经历诸多舆论纷争后,娃哈哈保持了一定增长速度。

2023年,娃哈哈在纯净水领域的市场份额为5.8%。到了2025年,这一数据稳定在了16%左右。

2024年,对于娃哈哈而言并不平静。当年2月25日,娃哈哈发布讣告,宣告娃哈哈集团创始人、董事长宗庆后离世。

宗庆后离世后,许多消费者为表示对这位“布鞋首富”的敬意,自发购买娃哈哈。当时,娃哈哈抖音官方旗舰店在没有开通直播的情况下,销量暴涨500%,一些经销商的仓库被买空。

不过,销量加速上涨的故事,没有持续很久。

2025年,娃哈哈集团深陷“遗产争夺战”“私生子”等风波。有经销商指出,舆论发酵最严重的那周(7月14日-20日),娃哈哈的销量并没有出现明显的上涨或者下跌,消费者根本不感兴趣。且有多位经销商表达了同样的观点。

从业绩的表现可以看到,舆论纷争,没有直接给娃哈哈带来太多负面的影响。但这不意味着娃哈哈可以高枕无忧了。

2025年,对于娃哈哈而言非常关键。告别了宗庆后的娃哈哈,依然是很多人儿时的回忆,仍有许多人愿意为情怀买单。某种程度上,这也是娃哈哈2024年销量暴涨,2025年维持巅峰的一大原因。

2013年,娃哈哈的年营收达到782.79亿元;2014年的营收为720.43亿元,是历史第二好的表现。

此后,娃哈哈的业绩持续颠簸,2015年-2020年营收徘徊在460亿元上下,直到2021年才重回500亿以上,2021年-2023年均徘徊于500亿元左右,2024年突破700亿元大关。

眼下,2025年的娃哈哈,守住了近十年的巅峰。但能否延续,却成为一个问号。

毕竟,市场最终会回归冷静,回归产品。而离开宗庆后的管理后,娃哈哈一度处于“失序”状态。

失序的娃哈哈,先要稳住

宗庆后退场后,娃哈哈管理层内部面临着激烈的人事斗争和动荡。而这是娃哈哈当下面临的极大挑战。

据媒体梳理,2024年宗馥莉接班初期,娃哈哈集团管理层大量被替换为宏胜饮料集团高管;当年8月,董事会成员全面变更。

2026年,宏胜核心高管团队再次调整。据财新报道,娃哈哈集团董事会成员之一、宏胜集团的总裁办主任叶雅琼于近日离职。同期离任的,还有宏胜集团销售总经理吴汀燕、法务部部长周卓盈,及生产管理科科长吴潘潘。

至此,分管宏胜集团行政、销售、法务、生产四大核心业务板块的原负责人均已离职。

此外,据报道,宏胜集团正将非生产业务进行外包。一位内部人士称,自今年年初以来,宏胜集团能动、物业、仓储、实验室四大板块业务外包工作,需在6月30日前全面落地完成,最终可能要裁员30%。

持续的管理动荡,已经在娃哈哈的市场端同步信号。

进入2026年,娃哈哈的业绩情况并不乐观。接近宏胜集团人士提供的一份宏胜集团内部文件披露了《3—4月各省经销商接货问题的考核通报》,其中提到截至5月9日,全国合计报站23亿,完成任务的66%,较同期仍负增长24%,发货5.2亿,仅完成任务的15%,较同期负增长83%,发货进度严重滞缓。

其中还提到3-4月全国经销商接货履约问题突出,尤其是242家客户缓发订单金额占比超40%。

经销商的反馈更为直接。5月12日,有千万元级体量的大经销商向媒体反馈,今年以来其娃哈哈产品销量同比下降了20%,存在压货的情况。

迟迟未有新爆品,是当下困住娃哈哈的一大枷锁。自2005年“营养快线”之后,娃哈哈至今仍未打造出新的拳头产品。

宗馥莉接手后面临的管理动荡,让这场产品破圈之路变得更加迷茫。

一位娃哈哈研发员工向媒体透露,2024年底时,娃哈哈基本就不研发新品了。而一位做娃哈哈20余年的经销商则提到,“不去研发新品,过度压货老产品,这是今年销售出现下滑的原因。”

宗馥莉曾在2024年底的销售会议上提出,2025年发展重点放在水和茶饮料品类。不过,线下零售监测机构马上赢数据显示,2026年一季度娃哈哈包装水产品市场份额为16.63%,排名第四,但销售额同比仅增长了3.73%,而去年同期这一增速接近100%。

而关于茶饮料,经销商给出的评价是“娃哈哈的茶饮料并不强势”。

新品研发始终未有较大成果,这是娃哈哈接下来要直面的增长挑战。

写在最后

2010年,宗庆后曾表示要“再造一个娃哈哈”,争取3年内实现年销售收入1000亿元。显然,这一目标并未完成。

2025年,不少娃哈哈经销商接到要增长50%的业绩目标。这也被外界解读为,娃哈哈要实现当年宗庆后未完成的心愿。

再造一个娃哈哈,迈向千亿,是宗庆后的雄心,也是娃哈哈的发展使命。但眼下,心急吃不了热豆腐。

当下娃哈哈亟需做的,或许不是冲刺千亿,而是先稳下来。稳住民心和军心,稳住渠道和产品,之后才有千亿之路。

参考资料:

1、亿邦动力:风暴中的娃哈哈经销商

2、中国企业家杂志:娃哈哈兵临城下

3、界面新闻:宗馥莉交出第一份成绩单:娃哈哈业绩重回巅峰

4、雷达财经:宗馥莉“挥刀”,娃哈哈代工厂“人事大地震”

5、每日经济新闻:大洗牌!宗馥莉免掉宏胜集团销售负责人!一家大经销商透露:娃哈哈销量下滑20%,确实存在压货的情况

6、秦朔朋友圈:从洁丽雅事件看,为什么中国家族企业还没有真正的老钱?

注:文/伯虎团队,文章来源:伯虎财经(公众号ID:bohuFN),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:伯虎财经

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0