广告
加载中

走不出新疆的“塞外茅台” 丢掉“西北酒王”宝座

李平 2026-07-07 19:11
李平 2026/07/07 19:11

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心讲新疆老牌白酒伊力特从“西北酒王”跌落,连续六年未完成经营目标,营收股价双下滑的发展现状,梳理了其发展历程和业绩失速的核心原因,核心干货如下

1.发展历程:伊力特前身是1955年的军垦小酿酒作坊,靠工艺改良成为新疆知名白酒,90年代坐稳西北白酒销售额第一的位置,1999年成功A股上市,之后剥离非核心业务聚焦白酒主业,2019年达到业绩峰值。

2.当前现状:截至2026年,伊力特股价跌至十年新低,市值仅46.84亿元,年内跌幅超30%;2025年营收17.22亿元,同比下滑21.82%,归母净利润2.16亿元,同比下滑24.29%,已经连续八个季度营收同比负增长。

3.核心原因:除了白酒行业整体下行的周期影响,自身还存在产品高端化升级滞后、疆外市场开拓失败、本土市场被竞品蚕食等深层结构性问题。

本文梳理了区域白酒品牌伊力特的衰退过程,为区域酒企品牌发展提供了多方面的经验教训,核心干货如下

1.行业与消费趋势:当前白酒行业产能过剩、需求增速放缓,马太效应加剧,利润不断向头部品牌集中,中尾部酒企生存空间被持续压缩,次高端价格带是区域品牌突破区域壁垒、实现全国化、升级品牌价值的关键支点。

2.产品战略教训:伊力特没能敏锐捕捉次高端白酒爆发的行业风向,高端化布局严重滞后,当前高中低档产品全线下滑,虽然高档酒占比被动提升至74%,但高档酒销售额自2019年就已经触顶回落,产品结构升级完全跟不上行业节奏。

3.渠道建设教训:伊力特开拓疆外市场依赖省外大商,自身精细化运营能力不足,加上地处边陲,运费占比达到15%-20%,是行业平均的2-3倍,严重制约全国化扩张,同时本土市场防御不足,被全国名酒和竞品金徽酒不断蚕食,疆内营收三年缩水超3亿元。

本文分析了当前白酒行业的整体环境,以及区域酒企伊力特的发展困境,给酒类经营者带来多方面参考,核心干货如下

1.行业环境与政策:2025年白酒行业迎来新一轮政策调整,全行业进入调整筑底期,20家主流上市酒企营收、利润双降,行业马太效应加剧,中尾部酒企增长压力陡增,整体生存环境偏紧。

2.风险提示:代理区域酒企需要警惕三类风险:一是酒企战略判断失误,错过行业结构性升级窗口,导致产品增长乏力;二是偏远区域酒企普遍存在物流成本过高的问题,会直接压缩经销商的利润空间;三是本土酒企基本盘不稳,会被头部酒企和周边竞品持续蚕食,份额持续下滑影响经销收益。

3.可参考的经验:竞品金徽酒的扩张路径值得学习,通过“布局全国、深耕西北”的战略,针对目标区域的主流价格带推出分层产品,既抢大众消费市场也布局高端市场,逐步完成了对伊力特的反超,成为新的西北酒王,这种稳扎稳打的区域渗透策略可参考。

本文以区域白酒生产企业伊力特的发展困境为案例,给白酒生产工厂提供了发展方向参考,核心干货如下

1.产品生产设计需求:当前白酒市场的结构性机会在次高端价格带,这也是区域酒企突破区域壁垒的核心支点,工厂需要敏锐捕捉行业风向,提前布局对应价格带的产品,匹配大众、商务等不同消费场景的需求,不能错过行业结构性升级的最佳窗口期。

2.商业机会与发展痛点:区域白酒工厂首先要守住本土基本盘,再规划全国化扩张,偏远产区的工厂需要提前解决物流成本过高的问题,伊力特的运费占比高达15%-20%,是行业平均水平的2-3倍,已经成为全国化扩张的核心掣肘。

3.发展启示:白酒生产工厂要始终聚焦主业,伊力特曾经盲目多元化布局煤化工、建材等非核心业务,后来及时剥离才稳住业绩,说明聚焦主业是区域酒企立身的根本;同时要持续优化产品结构,提前构建竞争壁垒,避免本土市场被竞品快速蚕食。

本文分析了当前白酒行业的整体走势,以及区域酒企面临的核心痛点,给服务酒企的服务商提供了明确的方向参考,核心干货如下

1.行业发展趋势:当前白酒行业进入深度调整期,全行业营收利润双双下滑,马太效应不断加剧,大量中尾部区域酒企都面临增长失速的困境,存在大量的破局服务需求,市场空间广阔。

2.客户核心痛点:当前区域酒企的共性痛点主要有三类,一是产品结构升级难,多数企业没能抓住次高端白酒升级的风口,高端化转型普遍遇阻;二是全国化扩张难,要么自身精细化市场运营能力不足,要么受区位限制物流成本过高,难以打开外部市场;三是本土市场防守难,面对头部名酒和周边竞品的双重冲击,份额不断下滑,业绩持续缩水,急需破局方案。

3.可切入的服务方向:可以针对区域酒企的需求,提供疆外市场精细化运营的配套服务,帮助酒企搭建本土运营体系;也可以优化供应链服务,帮助偏远产区酒企降低长途物流成本;还可以提供产品升级、品牌高端化的咨询服务,帮助酒企抓住行业结构性机会。

本文梳理了当前区域酒企的发展现状和核心需求,对酒水平台商的招商、运营和风险规避都有参考价值,核心干货如下

1.酒企对平台的核心需求:当前大量中尾部区域酒企面临增长困境,急需借助平台的渠道、流量资源,突破区域壁垒打开外部市场,同时也需要平台助力优化产品结构,完成高端化升级,稳住本土的市场份额,合作需求十分明确。

2.平台招商的方向参考:招商时可以优先引入战略清晰、产品结构合理的区域强势酒企,比如像金徽酒这类稳扎稳打、稳步扩张的酒企,合作潜力更大;尽量避开战略判断失误、基本面持续恶化的酒企,能有效降低合作风险。

3.运营优化与风险规避:要注意规避白酒行业整体调整带来的系统性风险,针对区域酒企物流成本过高的痛点,平台可以搭建专属供应链服务,帮助酒企降低运输成本;同时要适配行业马太效应加剧的趋势,合理调整平台的品牌布局,平衡头部酒企和区域优势酒企的占比,规避区域酒企份额持续下滑带来的库存风险。

本文以伊力特为典型案例,分析了行业调整期区域白酒企业的发展困境,给白酒产业研究提供了丰富的素材,核心干货如下

1.产业新动向:当前白酒行业进入新一轮调整周期,全行业营收利润双双下滑,马太效应不断加剧,利润进一步向头部头部品牌集中,中尾部区域酒企的生存空间被持续压缩,区域酒企的排位赛已经全面开启,老牌区域龙头被周边竞品反超已经成为新的产业现象。

2.产业新问题:当前偏远地区区域酒企突围存在多个普遍待解的问题,一是怎么提前判断行业风向,抓住次高端升级的窗口完成产品结构升级;二是怎么破解区位劣势带来的高物流成本问题,实现成功的全国化扩张;三是怎么守住本土基本盘,应对头部名酒和周边竞品的双重挤压。

3.商业模式研究价值:本文提供了非常清晰的对比案例,同样是西北区域酒企,伊力特多次尝试全国化拓展都没能成功,业绩持续下滑丢掉酒王宝座;金徽酒依托深耕西北、分层布局的战略逐步增长,完成了对伊力特的反超,为研究区域酒企的全国化扩张商业模式提供了典型的对比样本。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article examines the current decline of Yilite, a time-honored baijiu brand from Xinjiang once known as the "King of Northwest Baijiu". The brand has missed its operating targets for six consecutive years, with falling revenue and share price. This article traces Yilite's development history and analyzes the core reasons behind its slowing growth, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Development History: Yilite originated from a small wine-brewing workshop established by military reclamation farmers in 1955. It rose to prominence in Xinjiang through process improvements, secured the top spot in baijiu sales across Northwest China in the 1990s, and listed on China's A-share market in 1999. It later spun off non-core businesses to refocus on baijiu, hitting its performance peak in 2019.

2. Current Status: As of 2026, Yilite's share price has dropped to a 10-year low, with a market capitalization of only 4.684 billion yuan, and a year-to-date decline of over 30%. In 2025, it posted revenue of 1.722 billion yuan, down 21.82% year-on-year, and a net profit attributable to parent shareholders of 216 million yuan, down 24.29% year-on-year. It has recorded eight consecutive quarters of year-on-year revenue decline.

3. Core Reasons: Beyond the industry-wide downturn, Yilite suffers from deep-rooted structural issues: delayed high-end product upgrading, failed expansion outside Xinjiang, and eroding market share in its home region at the hands of competitors.

This article traces the decline of regional baijiu brand Yilite, drawing multi-faceted lessons for the development of regional baijiu brands, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Industry and Consumption Trends: Today's baijiu industry faces overcapacity, slowing demand growth, and intensifying the Matthew effect, with profits increasingly concentrated among top-tier brands and the living space of mid- and bottom-tier players continuously shrinking. The sub-premium price segment is a key foothold for regional brands to break through regional barriers, achieve national expansion, and upgrade brand value.

2. Lessons from Product Strategy: Yilite failed to catch the industry wind of the sub-premium baijiu boom, leaving its high-end布局 severely behind. All its product tiers (high, mid, low) have recorded declining sales. Even though the share of premium products has risen passively to 74%, premium sales have already peaked and declined since 2019. Its product structure upgrade has completely fallen behind industry trends.

3. Lessons from Channel Development: Yilite relied on large external distributors to expand out of Xinjiang, lacking in-house refined operational capabilities. Additionally, located in a remote border region, its shipping costs account for 15-20% of revenue — 2 to 3 times the industry average — which severely constrains national expansion. At the same time, it failed to defend its home market, which has been increasingly eroded by national leading brands and competitor Jinhuijiu, with in-Xinjiang revenue shrinking by more than 300 million yuan in three years.

This article analyzes the current overall environment of the baijiu industry and the growth difficulties of regional player Yilite, providing multi-dimensional insights for alcohol distributors, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Industry Environment and Policy: The baijiu industry entered a new round of policy adjustment in 2025, and the entire sector is now in a bottoming consolidation phase. The 20 leading listed baijiu players have recorded declines in both revenue and profit, with the Matthew effect intensifying, growth pressure surging for mid- and bottom-tier players, and overall operating conditions remaining tight.

2. Risk Warnings: Distributors working with regional baijiu brands should watch for three core risks: first, strategic misjudgment by the brand that causes it to miss the window for industry structural upgrade, leaving products with weak growth momentum; second, high logistics costs common for brands in remote regions, which directly compress distributors' profit margins; third, an unstable core home market that gets continuously eroded by leading brands and neighboring competitors, leading to sustained share declines that hurt distributor earnings.

3. Actionable Lessons: The expansion path of competitor Jinhuijiu is worth learning. Following its strategy of "national布局, deep cultivation of Northwest China", Jinhuijiu launched tiered products targeting the mainstream price segments of its target regions, competing for both mass consumer market and high-end market. It has gradually overtaken Yilite to become the new "King of Northwest Baijiu", and this steady regional penetration strategy is highly referential.

This paper takes the growth difficulties of regional baijiu producer Yilite as a case study, providing reference for development direction for baijiu production facilities, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Product Design Requirements: The structural opportunity in the current baijiu market lies in the sub-premium price segment, which is also the core foothold for regional players to break through regional barriers. Producers need to敏锐ly capture industry trends,布局 products for this price segment in advance, match the needs of different consumption scenarios such as mass consumption and business use, and not miss the optimal window for industry structural upgrade.

2. Business Opportunities and Pain Points: Regional baijiu producers should first secure their core home market before planning national expansion. Producers in remote producing regions need to resolve the problem of high logistics costs in advance. Yilite's shipping costs account for as much as 15-20% of revenue, 2 to 3 times the industry average, and this has become the core constraint on its national expansion.

3. Development Insights: Baijiu producers must always stay focused on their core business. Yilite once blindly diversified into non-core businesses such as coal chemical and building materials, and only stabilized performance after spinning off these assets, proving that focusing on the core business is the foundation for regional baijiu players to establish themselves. At the same time, producers should continuously optimize their product structure and build competitive barriers in advance to avoid rapid erosion of their home market by competitors.

This article analyzes the overall trend of the current baijiu industry and the core pain points facing regional players, providing clear directional reference for service providers serving baijiu enterprises, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Industry Development Trends: The baijiu industry is now in a period of deep adjustment, with industry-wide declines in both revenue and profit and intensifying the Matthew effect. A large number of mid- and bottom-tier regional baijiu players face growth stall, creating massive demand for turnaround services and leaving broad market space for service providers.

2. Core Client Pain Points: There are three common pain points for regional baijiu brands: first, difficulty upgrading product structure — most players failed to catch the boom of sub-premium baijiu upgrade, and high-end transformation generally faces obstacles; second, difficulty achieving national expansion — many lack refined in-house market operation capabilities, while others face excessively high logistics costs due to geographic location, making it hard to open up external markets; third, difficulty defending the home market — faced with dual pressure from leading national brands and neighboring competitors, their share continues to decline and performance keeps shrinking, leaving an urgent need for turnaround solutions.

3. Service Entry Points: Service providers can target regional players' needs by offering supporting services for refined operation of out-of-region markets, helping brands build local operation systems; they can also optimize supply chain services to help remote-region producers reduce long-distance logistics costs; they can also offer consulting services for product upgrade and brand high-end transformation, helping brands seize structural industry opportunities.

This article sorts out the current development status and core needs of regional baijiu brands, providing reference for alcohol platform operators in merchant recruitment, operation and risk avoidance, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Core Needs of Baijiu Brands from Platforms: Currently, a large number of mid- and bottom-tier regional baijiu brands face growth difficulties. They urgently need to leverage the platform's channel and traffic resources to break through regional barriers and open up external markets. At the same time, they need platform support to optimize product structure, complete high-end transformation, and stabilize home market share, with clear cooperation demand.

2. Reference for Platform Recruitment Direction: When recruiting new brands, platforms should prioritize strong regional brands with clear strategy and reasonable product structure, such as steady-growing, steadily expanding players like Jinhuijiu, which offer greater cooperation potential. Platforms should avoid brands with strategic misjudgment and continuously deteriorating fundamentals to effectively reduce cooperation risk.

3. Operation Optimization and Risk Avoidance: Platforms should pay attention to avoiding systemic risks brought by the overall industry adjustment. For the common pain point of high logistics costs for regional brands, platforms can build dedicated supply chain services to help brands reduce transportation costs. At the same time, adapting to the trend of intensifying Matthew effect, platforms should reasonably adjust the brand布局 on the platform, balance the share of leading national brands and strong regional players, and avoid inventory risks brought by sustained share decline of regional brands.

This article takes Yilite as a typical case to analyze the growth difficulties of regional baijiu enterprises during the industry adjustment period, providing rich material for baijiu industry research, with key takeaways as follows:

1. New Industry Trends: The baijiu industry has entered a new round of adjustment cycle, with industry-wide declines in both revenue and profit, intensifying the Matthew effect, and profits further concentrating among leading brands. The living space of mid- and bottom-tier regional players is continuously shrinking, and a ranking reshuffle among regional players has fully started. The overtaking of established regional leaders by neighboring competitors has become a new industry phenomenon.

2. New Industry Problems: There are multiple common unsolved problems for regional players in remote areas looking to break through: first, how to predict industry trends in advance and seize the window of sub-premium upgrade to complete product structure upgrading; second, how to solve the problem of high logistics costs brought by geographical disadvantages to achieve successful national expansion; third, how to defend the core home market amid dual pressure from leading national brands and neighboring competitors.

3. Value for Business Model Research: This article provides a very clear comparative case. Both are regional baijiu players in Northwest China: Yilite failed to achieve success after multiple attempts at national expansion, with sustained performance declines that cost it its title as the regional leader; Jinhuijiu grew gradually following its strategy of deep cultivation in Northwest China and tiered product layout, and completed the overtaking of Yilite. This provides a typical comparative sample for research on national expansion business models for regional baijiu enterprises.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

一面是新疆本土市场的持续缩水 ,一面是疆外市场的停滞不前。自 2020年算开始,伊力特已经连续六年未能完成年度经营目标。

1

股价回到十年前

“请问贵公司今后做大做强的计划,及怎样看待股民对今日伊力特股价暴跌的惨状?”

“公司已公布增持回购股份,为何迟迟没有行动?公司有没有稳定股价的措施?”

即便是祭出了换帅、大股东增持等一系列举措,“塞外茅台”伊力特依然没有阻止公司股价的持续大跌。截至最近一个日交易日时点,伊力特股价报收于为9.88元,市值为46.84亿人民币,2026年跌幅超过30%。拉长周期来看,伊力特股价更是创出十年以来(2016年5月)新低。

十年光阴流转,股价却回到了原点,这已令伊力特的中小投资者开始在互动平台上不断进行留言,字里行间写满了被辜负的错愕与不甘。

经营业绩的大幅缩水显然是伊力特在二级市场遭遇到投资人“用脚投票”的一个主要原因。数据显示,2025年全年,伊力特实现营收17.22亿元,同比下降21.82%,这也是其上市以来营收下滑幅度最大的一年;同时,公司实现归母净利润2.16亿元,同比下降24.29%。

对于经营业绩下滑的原因,伊力特在年报中表示,2025年,中国白酒行业迎来新一轮政策调整,行业内多重冲突凸显:产能过剩问题持续,而市场需求增速放缓;消费动能不足叠加渠道库存高企,部分产品价格倒挂,高端酒批价一度承压,消费场景弱化进一步加剧产业增长压力,行业正加速筑底。受白酒市场新一轮行业政策的影响,公司从二季度开始增速有所放缓,与行业整体趋同。

正如伊力特所言,中国白酒行业在2025年交出了一份寒意十足的年度成绩单。统计数据显示,2025年全年,20家主要白酒上市公司合计实现营业收入约3654.61亿元,同比下滑18.6%;合计实现归母净利润约1271.71亿元,同比缩水24.4%。而在行业马太效应加剧的背景下,白酒行业利润进一步向头部集中,中尾部酒企的生存空间被进一步压缩。

在这场剧烈的行业洗牌中,伊力特的表现尤为黯淡,其营收与净利润的双降幅度均超过主流白酒品牌平均水平。统计数据显示,在20家白酒上市公司中,伊力特的营收规模仅位列第15名,归母净利润则位列第14名。

进入到2026年以后,伊力特的经营颓势仍未有改观。2026年第一季度,伊力特实现营收6.06亿元,同比下滑23.79%;实现净利润1.05亿元,同比下滑27.26%。分季度来看,伊力特营收已经连续第八个季度出现同比负增长。

面对经营业绩的持续下滑,伊力特已经进行了一把手的调整。2025年12月15日,伊力特发布公告称,前董事长陈智因临近法定退休年龄,申请辞去董事长等相关职务,接任者为公司总经理李强,这也是继洋河股份、金种子酒、珍酒李渡、贵州茅台等品牌之后的又一家上市酒企的高层变动。

管理层调整之后,伊力特股价未能止跌,控股股东随即宣布将启动新一轮增持计划。2024年4月23日,伊力特公告称,公司控股股东、实控人的全资子公司新疆伊力特集团有限公司(简称“伊力特集团”)计划出资1-2亿元对伊力特进行增持,且不设定价格区间。

然而,面对控股股东抛出的亿元增持计划与核心管理层的调整,二级市场的投资者却并未买账。尤其是营收及净利润“双降”的财报业绩公布之后,伊力特的股价反而加速下行。

有分析认为,伊力特经营业绩的失速既有行业周期的负面影响,同时也暴露出其产品高端化升级遇阻、疆外市场开拓不利等一系列深层次的结构性危机。换句话说,基本面的恶化才是伊力特股价持续走弱的一个根本原因。

2

从军垦小作坊到“塞外茅台”

与众多具有悠久历史地方名酒品牌不同的是,伊力特前身只是新疆建设兵团十团农场副业加工厂于1955年成立的一个简陋酿酒组。

据悉,在当时的16人酿酒小组中,只有一人在老家酿过酒。最终,军垦战士们克服物资匮乏的困难,自制设备,改建工房,土法上马,成功试制出第一锅酒,并于1956年正式生产,并命名为“伊犁大曲”。

1957年,原酿酒组从加工厂分出后迁址到伊犁州肖尔布拉克县,正式组建“十团酿酒厂”。此后,十团酿酒厂很快便展现出对技术的敏锐嗅觉,积极引进酿酒专业的大学生进行工艺改良。凭借这一技术优势,伊力特迅速赢得了市场的青睐,成为新疆大地上家喻户晓的白酒。

据悉,越南国家主席胡志明曾于1959年2月访问新疆,时任新疆生产建设兵团司令陶峙岳用兵团自制的“伊犁大曲”进行接待,席间胡主席对“伊犁大曲”赞不绝口,“新疆茅台”之名由此远扬。

此后,十团酿酒厂又先后更名为“七十二团伊犁大曲酒厂”、“新疆伊犁酿酒总厂”,并陆续研制推出伊力特酿、伊力老窖、伊力陈酿等产品。上个世纪90年代,在白酒行业的黄金十年中,伊力特销量持续攀升,连续多年稳居西北白酒销售额第一,确立了其“西北王”的江湖地位。

1999年,新疆伊犁酿酒总厂正式改制成为新疆伊力特实业股份有限公司,并于A股成功上市,成为了中国第10家白酒上市酒企。至此,具有兵团红色基因的伊力特,也成为代表新疆优异生态品质的特色品牌。

登陆资本市场之后,伊力特曾一度尝试多元化扩张,先后涉足煤化工、建材、印务等多个领域。但面对激烈的市场竞争,伊力特很快意识到主业才是立身之本,进而果断剥离非核心业务,重新将战略重心聚焦于白酒主业。2019年,伊力特营收达到23.02亿元,净利润达到4.47亿元,在当年的白酒上市企业中分别位列第13位、第11位。对比看,另一家西北酒企金徽酒当年的营收为16.34亿元,净利润约为2.72亿元。

然而,自2020年开始,新疆地区相对严格的防疫管控政策对新疆宴会聚餐以及旅游赠礼等消费场景造成了极大的影响,伊力特经营业绩受到了明显的冲击。数据显示,2020年-2022年,伊力特营收连续三年低于20亿元,经营目标一再落空。

与此同时,面对次高端白酒的强势爆发,伊力特当时的管理层未能敏锐捕捉风向,导致公司在高端与次高端布局严重滞后,最终错失了白酒行业结构性升级的最佳窗口期。在经历了2023年的短暂回暖之后,伊利特营收自2024年便继续掉头向下,营收规模始终未能突破2019年的高峰时期。

3

错失次高端,疆外市场停滞不前

从营收构成上看,伊力特产品线覆盖高、中、低档,高档酒包括伊力王酒、壹号窖、伊力封坛、伊力老窖系列,营收占比超过60%;中档酒包含伊力老陈酒以及伊力特曲系列,营收占比在20%左右;低档酒主要包括伊力大曲和伊力春系列,营收占比不足10%。

2025年年报数据显示,伊力特高中低档白酒出现了全线下滑的情形。其中,包括伊力王酒、伊力老窖系列在内的高档酒实现营收12.81亿元,同比下滑16.16%;中档酒实现销售3.07亿元,同比降幅高达39.25%;低档酒实现营收0.99亿元,同比下滑26.45%。

由于中低档白酒的加速下滑,2025年伊力特高档白酒占比已经提升至74.42%,较十年前提升了20个百分点。但从销售金额来看,伊力特高档白酒营收规模自2019年便开始触顶回落。对比看,古井贡酒、今世缘等地方白酒品牌则实现了大幅上升。这也就是说,伊力特当前的业绩困境并非单纯由行业周期性下行所致,其深层症结更多在于自身战略与产品结构的内部积弊。

众所周知的是,次高端白酒属于地方名酒突破区域壁垒、实现全国化布局的一大战略跳板,同时也是支撑品牌价值跃升的一个关键支点。但由于在次高端白酒布局的失利,伊力特目前也面临到疆外停滞不前的被动局面。

作为区域型酒企,伊力特很早就提出了“走出新疆”的口号,并陆续开辟兰州、西安、浙江等市场。数据显示,早在2018年,伊力特疆外市场营收就突破5亿元。2020年,伊力特疆外市场营收更是达到了5.9亿元的历史高位。此后,随着新冠疫情的冲击,伊力特省外市场营收遭遇三连降,营收规模重新跌至5亿元之下。

2023年,伊力特再次提出“百城攻坚”战略,计划三年覆盖百城,推进疆外市场布局,快速在华东、华中打造1-3个亿元级销量样板市场。数据显示,2023年-2024年,伊力特疆外市场实现营收分别为4.89亿元、5.71亿元,同比增幅分别为5%、17%。2024年,伊力特省外市场营收占比达到25.90%。

但到了2025年,伊力特疆外市场严重受挫。数据显示,2025年全年,伊力特疆外实现营收3.04亿元,同比大幅下滑46.64%,规模大幅缩水也让伊力特疆外收入占比再次降至20%以下。

显然,从拉长周期来看,伊力特全国化市场的开拓并不成功。这其中,除了公司依赖于省外大商、自身精细化市场运作能力不足等因素之外,伊力特作为新疆酒企所面临的地理区位劣势也是一个客观原因。

由于新疆地处西北边陲,远离核心白酒消费市场,物流半径远超其他产区。据部分伊力特经销商表示,伊力特的运费占比高达行业平均水平的2-3倍,甚至达到15%-20%。这一比例显著高于其他白酒企业,成为伊力特全国化扩张的重要掣肘。

就在公司疆外市场开拓遇阻的同时,伊力特所依赖的新疆本土市场也不断遭遇到其他酒企的蚕食。数据显示,2023年-2025年,伊力特新疆市场实现营收从16.97亿元下滑至13.83亿元,三年缩水超过3亿元。这其中,除了茅台、五粮液等全国化名酒的冲击之外,有着“陇酒之王”称号的金徽酒攻势也较为猛烈。

据悉,作为甘肃白酒龙头,金徽酒自2020年起提出“布局全国、深耕西北、重点突破”的战略,将新疆纳入其西北五省(区)根据地市场的重要组成部分。在产品策略上,针对新疆市场大众消费以及商务消费的主流价格带,金徽酒推出“正能量”系列及“世纪金徽”中端产品,与伊力特的主力产品形成直接竞争。与此同时,金徽酒通过“金徽十八年”、“金徽二十八年”等高端产品积极抢占次高端市场,进一步切割了伊利特在高端市场的份额。

数据显示,2020年-2025年,金徽酒省外市场营收从2.89亿元增长至6.65亿元,营收占比从16.70%提升至22.79%,这与伊力特疆内市场的停滞不前形成了鲜明的对比。此消彼长之下,金徽酒营收规模早在2022年就实现了对伊力特的反超,成为西北白酒板块的新龙头。

一面是新疆本土市场的持续缩水,一面是疆外市场的停滞不前。而自2020年算起,伊力特已经连续六年未能完成年度经营目标。显然,在营收缩水、股价暴跌的多重压力下,伊力特亟需一场深刻的自我救赎,方能重铸“塞外茅台”的金字招牌,进而夺回西北酒王的宝座。

注:文/李平,文章来源:砺石商业评论(公众号ID:libusiness),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:砺石商业评论

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

伊力特是什么品牌?

伊力特是新疆特色白酒品牌,前身为1955年新疆建设兵团十团农场副业加工厂酿酒组,因品质优良被称为“塞外茅台”,曾连续多年稳居西北白酒销售额第一,1999年登陆A股,是国内第10家白酒上市企业。

伊力特近年经营状况怎么样?

自2020年起伊力特已连续6年未完成年度经营目标,2025年实现营收17.22亿元,同比下滑21.82%,归母净利润2.16亿元,同比下降24.29%;2026年第一季度营收、净利润仍分别同比下滑23.79%、27.26%。

伊力特业绩下滑的原因有哪些?

除白酒行业产能过剩、消费需求放缓的周期影响外,伊力特自身还存在次高端布局滞后错失行业升级窗口、疆外市场开拓能力不足、新疆本土市场被其他酒企蚕食、物流成本是行业平均2-3倍等问题。

现在的西北酒王是哪个品牌?

甘肃白酒龙头金徽酒2022年营收规模反超伊力特,成为西北白酒板块新龙头。金徽酒2020年起将新疆纳入核心布局市场,2025年省外市场营收达6.65亿元,营收占比提升至22.79%。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0