广告
加载中

德赛电池走出至暗时刻?业绩狂飙背后 仍是“高级组装厂”

魏帅 2026-08-10 09:56
魏帅 2026/08/10 09:56

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文梳理了老牌锂电企业德赛电池的发展历程、最新业绩与现存问题,普通读者可快速获取核心信息,也能为个人投资决策提供参考。

1. 核心业绩信息:2026年上半年德赛电池归母净利润预计同比增长超100%,业绩跑赢多数券商预期,带动股价逆势上行。此次业绩增长来自此前两年布局的新赛道进入收获期,储能电芯产能满产爬坡,SiP封装受益于可穿戴、AR/VR放量获得议价主动权,长期投入开始转化为经营性现金流。

2. 需要注意的潜在风险:企业仍存在长期毛利率偏低、ROA持续低位、现金流不宽裕、大客户依赖未解决等问题,至今仍未摆脱代工属性,短期业绩反弹不代表长期价值已经确立,投资需要保持谨慎。

本文以德赛电池为案例,给消费电子、新能源领域品牌商梳理了产业趋势与发展经验,具备较高参考价值。

1. 消费与产业趋势:当前可穿戴设备、AR/VR等新型终端快速放量,带动SiP高集成封装从市场选配变为必选,该领域对良率、精度要求极高,入局门槛高,玩家少,是值得布局的高潜力方向;储能市场增长明确,电芯+Pack一体化布局已经开始兑现利润,存在明确增长机会。

2. 经验与教训:德赛依靠切入苹果供应链实现二十倍规模扩张,但过度依赖大客户导致议价权弱、估值折价,品牌商需要主动提前布局第二增长曲线,分散单一客户依赖风险。

3. 竞争痛点参考:电池Pack封装属于产业链低利润环节,上游成本波动全额传导,下游大客户常年压价,仅能赚加工费,想要获得更高利润必须向上延伸掌握核心技术,赚取技术溢价。

本文梳理了锂电产业链细分领域的发展现状,给布局相关领域的卖家整理了增长机会与风险提示,可作为业务布局参考。

1. 可挖掘的市场机会:储能属于当前高增长赛道,电芯+Pack一体化布局随着产能爬坡已经兑现利润,市场需求充足;SiP封装赛道受益于可穿戴、AR/VR等新型终端放量,需求快速提升,全球具备量产能力的玩家很少,先入局的玩家已经掌握议价主动权,增长空间大。

2. 需要警惕的风险提示:封装类业务处于产业链弱势环节,上游原材料价格波动、下游大客户压价都会挤压利润空间;过度依赖少数大客户会导致业绩随大客户出货周期大幅波动,抗风险能力弱;重资产布局新赛道前期投入大、爬坡周期长,会持续挤压利润,带来较大的现金流压力。

3. 可借鉴经验:传统企业可依托原有技术积累切入新赛道拓展第二增长曲线,长期坚持布局最终可兑现收益。

本文围绕德赛电池的业务转型,给锂电、消费电子领域生产工厂梳理了商业机会与发展启示。

1. 生产需求与商业机会:下游可穿戴、AR/VR、汽车电子等领域对SiP高集成封装需求爆发,这类产品对良率、精度、稳定性要求极高,全球能实现量产的厂商极少,具备技术和产能积累的工厂有较大的市场竞争空间;储能市场持续增长,电芯+Pack一体化产能已经进入收获期,市场需求充足。

2. 工厂转型发展启示:依托代加工起家的工厂,若想获得更高利润,需要向产业链上游核心环节延伸,摆脱单纯赚加工费的低利润模式;布局新赛道需要提前进行技术和产能投入,长期坚持才能最终兑现收益;需要主动优化客户结构,避免过度依赖少数大客户,否则会丧失议价权,利润容易被挤压,业绩波动幅度大。

3. 资金端提示:布局重资产长周期项目需要匹配合理的融资结构,避免短债长投错配放大现金流风险。

本文梳理了锂电和消费电子封装行业的发展现状,给相关领域服务商提供了行业趋势、客户痛点与业务机会参考。

1. 行业发展趋势:锂电产业链分工清晰,Pack封装环节长期处于低利润区间,头部代工企业纷纷向储能、高端SiP封装领域延伸,拓展第二增长曲线;可穿戴、AR/VR等新型终端带动高端封装需求爆发,储能市场持续增长,整个行业向高端化、多元化方向发展,转型需求旺盛。

2. 客户核心痛点:制造企业布局新赛道需要大量资本投入,前期产能爬坡阶段利润偏低,资金缺口大;多数企业选择短期借款、发债融资,容易出现短债长投的错配问题,现金流安全边际持续降低;同时代工厂面对头部大客户普遍处于账期弱势,大量资金被应收账款占用,周转压力大。

3. 业务机会:服务商可针对企业扩产的资金需求,推出匹配长周期重资产业务的融资产品,也可针对应收账款问题推出供应链金融服务,解决客户资金周转痛点。

本文分析了锂电产业链企业的发展现状,给相关产业平台梳理了企业需求、招商方向与风险管控方向。

1. 企业对平台的核心需求:代工类企业普遍存在客户结构集中、议价权弱的问题,需要平台帮助对接多元化下游客户,降低对少数头部大客户的依赖,提升自身议价能力;企业布局新赛道需要大规模采购原材料,需要平台帮助对接上游优质供应商,提升原材料议价能力,降低采购成本。

2. 平台招商布局方向:可重点引入具备SiP高端封装、储能电芯生产能力的制造企业,当前这类企业受益于下游需求放量,已经进入业绩兑现期,发展潜力大,能够为平台带来新增量。

3. 平台运营风险管控方向:需要提醒入驻企业优化客户结构与负债结构,避免过度依赖大客户和短债长投错配带来的经营风险,帮助企业管控风险,提升平台整体的抗风险能力。

本文以德赛电池为典型案例,梳理了传统果链代工厂转型的现状,给产业研究者提供了丰富的研究样本与参考信息。

1. 当前产业新动向:传统果链代工企业为摆脱大客户依赖,纷纷向储能、高端SiP封装领域拓展第二增长曲线;老牌国资背景的代工企业凭借长期技术积累和资金支持,率先实现新业务产能释放,业绩开始兑现;下游新型终端的发展带动高端封装需求爆发,行业技术门槛提升,少数具备量产能力的企业优先享受行业红利。

2. 产业发展面临的新问题:多数转型企业仍然未摆脱代工基因,新业务大多仍属于代加工范畴,难以获得技术溢价,毛利率存在明显天花板;转型过程中大规模资本投入推高负债规模,短债长投的错配进一步放大了现金流风险,大客户依赖的核心问题没有得到根本解决,市场对企业的估值存在较大分歧,尚未形成共识。

3. 本文为研究代工企业向科技型企业转型的路径、商业模式提供了典型样本,可推动相关领域的深入研究。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines the development trajectory, latest performance and existing challenges of Desay Battery, a veteran lithium-ion battery manufacturer. It allows general readers to quickly access core information and provides reference for personal investment decisions.

1. Key performance takeaways: Desay Battery projects its net profit attributable to shareholders will grow over 100% year-on-year in the first half of 2026, outperforming most broker forecasts and driving its share price up against broader market headwinds. The growth comes from new business segments the firm laid out over the past two years now entering their harvest period: energy storage cell capacity is operating at full output amid ramp-up, while its SiP packaging business has gained pricing power from surging demand in wearables and AR/VR. Long-term investments have begun converting into operating cash flow.

2. Potential risks to note: Desay still faces persistent challenges including low long-term gross margins, a stagnant low return on assets, tight cash flow, and continued heavy reliance on major clients. It has yet to shake off its OEM nature, so a short-term performance rebound does not confirm long-term value creation, and investors should remain cautious.

Using Desay Battery as a case study, this article outlines industry trends and development lessons for brands in consumer electronics and new energy sectors, offering high-value reference insights.

1. Consumer and industry trends: New end products such as wearables and AR/VR are seeing rapid volume growth, pushing high-density SiP packaging from an optional feature to an industry standard. This segment requires extremely high yield and precision, creating high entry barriers and limited competition, making it a high-potential space worth exploring. The energy storage market has clear growth visibility, and cell-and-Pack integrated layouts are already delivering profits, opening up tangible growth opportunities.

2. Lessons learned: Desay achieved 20x scale expansion by entering Apple's supply chain, but over-reliance on a single major client left it with weak pricing power and a discounted valuation. Brands need to proactively build a second growth curve early to diversify risk from over-concentrated client exposure.

3. Competitive pain point reference: Battery Pack packaging is a low-margin link in the supply chain, where all upstream cost fluctuations are passed through and large downstream clients continuously squeeze prices, leaving players with only processing fees. To capture higher margins, businesses must move upstream to master core technologies and earn technology-driven premiums.

This article summarizes the current development of niche segments along the lithium battery supply chain, organizes growth opportunities and risk warnings for sellers active in related fields, and can serve as a reference for business layout.

1. Exploitable market opportunities: Energy storage is currently a high-growth track, and cell-and-Pack integrated layouts have started delivering profits as capacity ramps up, with ample market demand. The SiP packaging track is seeing rapid demand growth driven by booming shipments of new end products including wearables and AR/VR, with very few global players capable of mass production. Early entrants have already gained pricing power, leaving significant room for growth.

2. Risks to watch out for: Packaging businesses occupy a weak position in the supply chain, where upstream raw material price volatility and price squeezing by large downstream clients both compress margins. Over-reliance on a small number of major clients leaves performance highly sensitive to clients' shipment cycles, resulting in weak risk resilience. Heavy-asset layout of new tracks requires large upfront investment and long ramp-up periods, which continuously squeezes profits and creates significant cash flow pressure.

3. Actionable lessons: Traditional enterprises can leverage existing technical expertise to enter new tracks and expand a second growth curve, and sustained long-term investment will eventually pay off.

Focused on Desay Battery's business transformation, this article outlines business opportunities and development insights for manufacturing factories in the lithium battery and consumer electronics sectors.

1. Production demand and business opportunities: Downstream sectors including wearables, AR/VR and automotive electronics are seeing explosive demand for high-density SiP packaging. These products require extremely high yield, precision and stability, with very few manufacturers globally capable of mass production, leaving large competitive space for factories with existing technology and capacity accumulation. The energy storage market continues growing, and cell-and-Pack integrated capacity has now entered the harvest period with strong market demand.

2. Insights for factory transformation and development: Factories built on OEM foundations that aim for higher profits need to extend upstream to core links in the industrial chain, moving away from the low-margin model of earning only processing fees. Layout of new tracks requires early investment in technology and capacity, and sustained long-term commitment is required to eventually realize returns. Factories also need to proactively optimize their client structure to avoid over-reliance on a small number of major clients, which erodes pricing power, compresses profits and leads to large performance volatility.

3. Capital side reminder: Layout of heavy-asset, long-cycle projects requires a reasonable financing structure to avoid amplifying cash flow risk from maturity mismatch between short-term debt and long-term investment.

This article summarizes the current development of the lithium battery and consumer electronics packaging industry, and provides reference on industry trends, client pain points and business opportunities for service providers in related sectors.

1. Industry development trends: The lithium battery supply chain has a clear division of labor, with the Pack packaging segment stuck in a low-margin environment for a long time. Leading OEMs are increasingly extending into energy storage and high-end SiP packaging to build a second growth curve. Booming demand for new end products such as wearables and AR/VR has driven an explosion in demand for high-end packaging, while the energy storage market continues expanding. The entire industry is shifting toward higher-end and more diversified development, with strong demand for transformation.

2. Core client pain points: Manufacturers need large capital inputs to layout new tracks, with low margins during the upfront capacity ramp-up phase creating significant funding gaps. Most firms rely on short-term loans and bond issuance, which easily leads to maturity mismatch between short-term debt and long-term investment, continuously eroding cash flow safety buffers. Meanwhile, OEMs typically face unfavorable payment terms with major clients, leaving large amounts of capital tied up in accounts receivable and creating significant working capital pressure.

3. Business opportunities: Service providers can develop financing products tailored for long-cycle, heavy-asset expansion to meet enterprises' capital needs, and launch supply chain financial services targeting accounts receivable to solve clients' working capital pain points.

This article analyzes the current development of lithium battery supply chain enterprises, and organizes corporate demand, investment attraction priorities and risk control directions for relevant industrial platforms.

1. Core corporate demand from platforms: OEMs generally face the challenges of concentrated client structure and weak pricing power, and need platforms to help connect with diversified downstream clients to reduce reliance on a small number of major clients and strengthen their own pricing power. When laying out new tracks, enterprises need to source large volumes of raw materials, and require platforms to help connect with high-quality upstream suppliers to improve raw material pricing power and reduce procurement costs.

2. Investment attraction priorities for platforms: Platforms should prioritize onboarding manufacturing enterprises with capabilities in high-end SiP packaging and energy storage cell production. These companies are already benefiting from surging downstream demand and entering the profit realization phase, with strong development potential that can bring new growth momentum to the platform.

3. Risk control directions for platform operations: Platforms need to remind onboarded enterprises to optimize client structure and liability structure, avoid operational risks from over-reliance on major clients and maturity mismatch between short-term debt and long-term investment, and help enterprises manage risks to improve the overall risk resilience of the platform.

Using Desay Battery as a representative case, this article summarizes the current transformation status of traditional Apple supply chain OEMs and provides a rich research sample and reference information for industry researchers.

1. Latest industry developments: To escape over-reliance on major clients, traditional Apple supply chain OEMs are expanding into energy storage and high-end SiP packaging to build second growth curves. Veteran state-backed OEMs, leveraging long-term technical accumulation and capital support, have been the first to release capacity for new businesses and start delivering performance. The growth of downstream new end products has driven an explosion in demand for high-end packaging, raised industry technical barriers, and allowed the small number of mass-production-capable players to capture industry dividends first.

2. Emerging challenges for industry development: Most transforming enterprises have not yet shaken off their OEM DNA, with most new businesses still falling under the processing category, making it difficult to capture technology premiums and creating a clear ceiling for gross margins. Large-scale capital investment during transformation pushes up debt levels, and the mismatch between short-term debt and long-term investment further amplifies cash flow risk. The core problem of over-reliance on major clients remains fundamentally unsolved, leading to large valuation disagreements among market participants that have yet to converge.

3. This article provides a representative sample for researching the transformation path and business model of OEMs shifting toward technology-focused enterprises, and can support deeper research in related fields.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

当行业内大多还在苦于市场复苏、卷成一片红海之际,有着国资背景的老牌锂电企业——德赛电池,却抢先扔出了一份足以让市场瞩目的中报预告。

7月中旬,公司披露2026年上半年业绩预告,归母净利润预计同比增长超过100%,这份成绩单甚至跑赢了绝大多数券商此前给出的乐观预期。

二级市场也几乎在同一时间完成了“用脚投票”,让震荡许久的股价实现逆势上行。这家在过去两年多时间里被市场戏称“投产越多、亏损越多”的德赛电池,似乎正在挣脱那段令投资者难以回望的至暗时刻。

但在这份漂亮的预告背后,是长期贴地飞行的毛利率、并不宽裕的现金流,以及始终没有完全解构的“代工基因”。

一位长期跟踪锂电产业链的机构投资者对「创业最前线」感慨,德赛电池的问题从来不是能不能挣钱,而是能不能挣“像样”的钱。

这句评价,或许比任何一份研报都更能概括当下资本市场对它的态度。

01 吞金兽终于开始“下蛋”

要理解这次业绩,就必须将镜头的视角拉远,回到德赛电池那段过往岁月。

母公司德赛集团的发展可追溯至上世纪80年代初,是改革开放后广东地方国资孵化的电子工业样本之一。

80年代中期,惠州方面与香港金山工业集团设立合资公司,以“国资牌照+港资技术+外向型订单”的组合切入碱性电池、镍镉电池代工赛道,奠定了外销基因。

90年代,惠州地方将旗下电子资产整合打包,正式打出“德赛”品牌,形成涵盖电池、视听、汽车电子、通信部品的多元化电子集团。

2004年,德赛集团借壳深圳老牌上市公司“深万山”实现A股登陆并更名为德赛电池。

2007年iPhone横空出世,全球消费电子供应链被重新洗牌,德赛电池踩中了这场时代性红利。

彼时公司已在锂电池Pack与BMS(电池管理系统)环节完成技术沉淀,凭借与ATL电芯的深度协同、惠州基地的成本与交付优势,成功切入苹果供应体系,成为iPhone、iPad、MacBook及后续AirPods系列的核心电池Pack供应商之一。

自此,德赛电池完成了从传统电池制造商向“果链核心标的”的身份跃迁:营收规模由2007年的不足10亿元,一路攀升至2021年的近200亿元,十四年间扩张逾二十倍。

然而,成也苹果、忧也苹果——公司对苹果的收入依赖曾一度超过50%,业绩与估值高度绑定iPhone出货周期,“大客户依赖”与“果链估值折价”由此成为悬于德赛头顶的双刃剑,也直接催生了其后续向电动工具、储能领域进行第二增长曲线突围的战略转身。

从2022年开始,德赛电池就在做一件让投资者“又爱又恨”的事——把辛苦从苹果产业链上赚来的钱,几乎一股脑地砸进了两个新赛道:一个是储能电芯自研自产项目,另一个是SiP(即系统级封装)业务。

这两条线在过去两年扮演的都是“吞金兽”的角色:前者需要动辄数十亿的固定资产投入、漫长的产线爬坡周期,以及在电芯自研阶段的良率爬坡;后者则要在苹果供应链之外,向可穿戴、AR/VR、汽车电子等新型终端渗透,前期研发和客户认证成本投入同样不小。

如此布局的直接结果便是,从2023年到2025年上半年,公司营收增长、产能扩张,但净利润却在原地打转。资本开支高企、折旧摊销压顶、财务费用抬升,构成了那段时间德赛电池最典型的财务画像。

直到2026年上半年这份业绩预告。

储能电芯业务的产能释放,让德赛电池此前布局的储能电芯与Pack一体化产能,在这个节点上进入满产爬坡阶段;随着采购量提升,公司在正极、负极、电解液等材料上的议价能力也开始变强。

另一方面,SiP封装业务毛利率有了显著修复。SiP作为高集成度封装方案,广泛应用于智能手表、TWS耳机、AR眼镜、健康监测设备等对空间极度敏感的终端。这类产品的共同特征是:单价不高,但对良率、精度、稳定性要求极高,能玩得动的玩家全球屈指可数。

随着可穿戴与AR/VR类终端在2026年出现明显放量,SiP产品从“选配”变成“必选”,德赛电池作为少数具备量产能力的供应商,在议价和排产上都获得了更大的主动权。

德赛电池长期战略投入终于开始转化为经营性现金流——从这个意义上说,德赛电池确实交出了一份含金量不低的答卷。

02 漂亮数据下的另一张面孔

而当我们不再聚焦于短期叙事,翻开德赛电池近十年的财务报表,一个不太容易被大众投资者注意到的指标,其实一直在向市场发出警示——资产回报率(ROA)持续处于历史低位。

ROA衡量的是每一块钱资产能为公司创造多少利润,是判断一家公司“钱花得值不值”的核心指标。

作为一家营收百亿量级的锂电企业,德赛电池的ROA长期在个位数徘徊,且与前几年相比呈现下滑趋势。这背后有一个非常朴素的原因:它扩张的速度,快于赚钱的速度。

这样的表现,与其所处的行业结构直接相关。

同为锂电产业链,上游的锂矿、电解液龙头动辄能做到20%乃至40%以上的毛利,中游的头部电芯厂如宁德时代也稳定在20%左右。

而德赛电池综合毛利率算下来仅有10%左右,其所处的电池Pack封装环节,是整个产业链中议价能力最弱的一环——上游电芯、结构件、BMS的价格波动几乎全额传导过来,下游又要面对苹果、三星这样“每年谈价一次、只降不升”的强势客户。

这就是典型的“苦生意”:赚的是加工费,玩的是规模、周转和管理效率。原材料涨一点、良率掉一点、订单少一点——任何一个环节的变化都可能把本就单薄的利润吃掉。

这也是为什么,尽管此次业绩爆发让市场兴奋,但审慎的分析师依然不敢轻易上调其长期估值的逻辑。

另一方面,资金链仍是德赛电池身上值得警惕的一根弦。

过去几年,为了推进储能与SiP项目的产能建设,公司加大了银行借款、发行了公司债,负债规模明显抬升。当利润在爬坡、现金流尚未完全跟上时,这些债务对应的财务费用就成了压在净利润身上的一块石头。

更值得警惕的是负债结构本身。公司短期借款占比长期偏高,与储能这类重资产、长回收周期业务的现金流节奏并不完全匹配,是一种典型的“以短博长”融资姿态。

与此同时,公司在下游苹果、三星等大客户体系中长期处于“账期弱势方”——大量收入以应收账款形式沉淀在报表上,占用了本就不宽裕的流动资金。两头夹击之下,现金及现金等价物的安全垫呈持续下降趋势,公司应对突发性风险的缓冲空间正在被一点点压缩。

因此,中报预告似乎只解决了利润表的问题,另外两张表的修复,才是德赛真正需要向市场证明的下半场。

03 代工巨头与科技新贵之间的摇摆

站在2026年年中这个时间节点上,资本市场对德赛电池的定价,正处于一个极其尴尬的博弈期。

储能电芯自研自产的推进、SiP高阶封装的放量、可穿戴与AR/VR终端的时代红利、以及惠州国资背景带来的产业加持,让公司的成长故事第一次拥有了“消费电子+新能源+高端封装”的三线叙事。

市场投资者押注的,本质上也是这套估值体系的切换。

但另一方面,如果穿透业务本质,德赛电池仍未完全摆脱骨子里的“代工基因”——Pack是代工、SiP本质上也是代工、储能Pack依旧是代工,即便向上一步做到了电芯自研,短期内也很难在成本曲线上打赢头部厂商。

它更像是一个高级组装厂,而不是一个真正意义上手握核心技术定价权的科技公司。

本质上,代工厂赚的是成本加成——通过规模、良率、周转、账期把加工费一分一分抠出来;科技公司赚的则是技术溢价——通过专利、算法、技术获得穿越周期的定价权。

前者是标准的周期股逻辑,后者则是标准的成长股逻辑。

今天的德赛,苹果收入占比虽已从高位有所回落,但主要大客户仍集中在少数消费电子平台型公司手里,SiP业务尤其如此。在客户结构没有实质性多元化之前,“科技新贵”的叙事就永远缺一块最重要的拼图。

事实上,储能业务当前的毛利率天花板受制于电芯价格战,SiP业务的毛利率天花板受制于客户结构与替代威胁。

哪怕两条线在营收侧都能贡献可观增量,如果最终无法在综合毛利率上跑出一个明显向上的斜率,德赛电池的估值故事,仍然会被市场归类为“更大规模的加工厂”,而非“技术含量更高的平台型公司”。

正因如此,市场对德赛电池当下的定价,才会呈现出一种典型的“精神分裂”状态:短期是消费电子代工股,中期是储能成长股,长期是国资科技平台的期权。三种估值体系交替占据主导,也让公司股价在过去两年里始终围绕一个宽幅区间来回震荡,尚未形成新的定价共识。

而这场估值博弈的最终答案,靠的不是一份简单的中报,而是写在此后连续几个季度的毛利率斜率、客户结构与现金流曲线之中。

注:文/魏帅,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:创业最前线

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

德赛电池2026年上半年业绩大幅增长的原因是什么?

一方面其储能电芯业务产能释放,储能电芯与Pack一体化产能进入满产爬坡阶段,上游原材料采购议价能力有所提升;另一方面SiP封装业务毛利率显著修复,可穿戴与AR/VR终端放量下,公司作为少数具备量产能力的供应商议价权明显提升。

德赛电池当前发展面临的主要瓶颈有哪些?

一是仍未摆脱代工基因,综合毛利率仅10%左右,在锂电产业链中议价能力偏弱;二是负债规模抬升且短期借款占比偏高,应收账款占比大,现金流安全垫持续收窄,应对突发性风险的缓冲空间不足。

德赛电池的核心业务覆盖哪些领域?

德赛电池核心业务覆盖三大领域,一是消费电子电池Pack业务,是苹果等头部消费电子品牌的核心电池供应商;二是储能电芯及Pack业务;三是SiP系统级封装业务,可适配智能手表、AR眼镜等小型智能终端。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0