广告
加载中

刚上市就成A股“股王” 中一签可赚82万 联讯仪器的狂欢能持续多久?

于莹 2026-06-01 06:33
于莹 2026/06/01 06:33

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文梳理了刚上市的联讯仪器的股价暴涨情况和背后潜藏的风险,核心干货如下:

1. 核心基本信息:联讯仪器是国产光通信和半导体测试仪器龙头,是全球少数能量产供货400G、800G、1.6T高速光模块核心测试仪器的厂商,2026年4月上市后23个交易日股价较发行价涨超20倍,一度超越贵州茅台成为A股新股王,中一签持有至今浮盈接近82万元,最新总市值超1700亿元。

2. 普通投资者需要警惕的风险:经营层面,公司超一半资产被应收账款和存货套牢,对头部大客户依赖度高,回款慢坏账风险高,且光模块技术迭代仅12-18个月,高存货随时可能跌价;资本层面,公司动态市盈率超300倍远高于行业平均,流通股占比不足20%,未来三年有超80%股份解禁,高估值下回调风险极大,不要盲目追高。

联讯仪器作为国产高端测试仪器龙头的发展路径,给国内硬科技品牌的发展提供了很多值得参考的干货:

1. 赛道与消费趋势:当前AI技术爆发带动高速光模块需求暴涨,上游核心测试仪器存在大量国产替代空白,市场需求旺盛,国产品牌只要抓住技术突破窗口就能享受行业红利,联讯仪器三年营收增长近五倍,从亏损转为年盈利1.74亿元,就是典型案例。

2. 渠道建设经验:联讯仪器不仅拿下了中际旭创、新易盛等国内头部光模块厂商的订单,还成功打入了多家国际巨头的供应链,成功登顶国内光电子器件测试设备市场份额第一,这种先扎根国内再拓展国际的路径值得同类品牌参考。

3. 需要警惕的经营问题:联讯为抢占市场放宽付款账期,叠加对大客户依赖度过高,导致议价权弱、回款慢,一半资产被应收和存货套牢,品牌商扩张时要平衡市场抢占和风控,避免留下长期经营隐患。

本文透露了光通信上游测试仪器赛道的机会和风险,给相关从业者整理了核心干货如下:

1. 当前市场机会:AI算力爆发带动800G、1.6T高速光模块需求呈指数级增长,上游核心测试仪器缺口极大,目前全球仅少数厂商、国内仅联讯等极少数厂商能批量供货高端产品,整个赛道处于高速增长的蓝海阶段,有技术储备的卖家仍有切入机会。

2. 可学习的发展经验:联讯仪器提前布局高端1.6T光模块测试技术,抓住国产替代的政策和市场窗口,打破海外厂商垄断,快速切入国内外头部客户供应链,实现业绩爆发式增长,路径值得同赛道卖家借鉴。

3. 需要警惕的风险提示:行业技术迭代周期仅12-18个月,需求受AI资本开支影响波动大,若未来AI需求不及预期,高存货会面临大幅跌价风险;同时下游光模块行业集中度高,卖家容易对大客户形成依赖,议价权弱,会带来回款慢、坏账率高的问题,行业下行期压力会进一步放大。

联讯仪器的爆发式增长,给国内高端制造工厂带来了不少市场机会和经营启示,核心干货如下:

1. 明确的商业机会:当前高速光模块行业需求爆发,上游测试仪器厂商为了抢份额,普遍提前3-6个月备货核心零部件,而且下游需求还在持续增长,给核心零部件生产工厂带来了明确的增量订单。同时高端测试仪器国产替代空间大,具备设计生产能力的工厂可以切入这个高景气赛道,分享行业红利。

2. 产品研发与生产启示:联讯仪器靠覆盖光通信全产业链核心环节测试、率先量产高端1.6T测试仪器的技术优势,打破了海外垄断,拿下国内第一的市场份额,说明制造工厂只要坚持高端技术研发,抓住国产替代的窗口就能实现跨越式增长。

3. 经营管理启示:工厂在行业高景气阶段扩张时,不能为了抢订单过度放宽账期,也不能盲目囤货,同时要优化客户结构,降低对少数大客户的依赖,避免行业下行时陷入坏账和存货跌价的双重危机。

本文梳理了当前光通信测试仪器行业的发展趋势和企业痛点,给相关服务商提供了以下核心干货:

1. 行业发展趋势:AI大模型带动全球AI算力需求爆发,高速光模块行业快速扩张,直接带动上游核心测试仪器需求呈指数级增长,本土厂商依靠技术突破快速替代海外产品,整个行业维持高景气度,市场规模持续快速扩大,给相关配套服务商带来了大量新增客户。

2. 客户核心痛点:本土测试仪器厂商在高速扩张过程中,普遍面临两大核心痛点:一是为了抢占市场份额,普遍接受更长的付款账期,导致应收账款高企、回款速度慢,多数厂商存在现金流紧张的问题;二是为了应对爆发式需求提前备货,存货规模持续走高,叠加行业技术迭代快,存货跌价风险很高。

3. 服务商业务机会:金融服务商可以针对行业特点开发应收账款保理、订单质押等供应链金融产品,解决厂商现金流问题;供应链管理服务商可以为厂商提供库存优化管理服务,帮助厂商降低存货跌价风险,市场空间广阔。

联讯仪器上市后的表现和存在的问题,给资本市场平台的运营管理带来了不少启示,核心干货如下:

1. 科创企业上市后的新特征:当前符合AI、国产替代热点的专精特新科创企业上市后,很容易受到资本热炒,短期内出现股价暴涨、估值远超行业合理水平的情况,而且上市初期多数股份处于禁售期,流通股占比很低,少量资金就可以拉动股价大幅上涨,更容易滋生炒作风险。

2. 需要警惕的潜在问题:当前次新股普遍存在限售股集中解禁的问题,像联讯仪器有超80%的股份会在未来三年逐步解禁,前期股价被过度炒作后,解禁期一旦到来,股东减持很容易引发股价大幅波动,会损害中小投资者利益,也影响市场稳定。

3. 运营优化方向:平台可以进一步强化上市初期高估值次新股的风险披露要求,督促企业主动公开经营层面的潜在风险,强化对投资者的风险提示;同时可以引导企业和原股东主动延长锁定期,稳定市场预期,避免股价大起大落。

联讯仪器上市造富事件,给研究国产高端仪器产业和资本市场定价提供了典型样本,核心研究相关干货如下:

1. 产业新动向:当前AI算力爆发带动整个光模块产业链向上突破,上游核心测试仪器环节已经实现国产龙头的技术突破,打破了海外厂商的长期垄断,本土龙头已经进入国际巨头供应链,国产替代进程明显加快;同时苏州形成了适合高科技硬科技企业成长的产业资本环境,国资早期入局持续加码,培育出多家光模块领域龙头,这种产业培育模式值得深入研究。

2. 产业与资本市场新问题:当前资本市场对AI上游优质国产替代标的给予了极高的估值溢价,联讯动态市盈率超300倍,远高于电子测量仪器行业55-75倍的平均水平,存在明显透支未来成长空间的问题;上市初期极低的流通股比例放大了市场情绪对股价的影响,推高了估值泡沫,行业增长红利掩盖了企业营运资金管理和客户结构的长期短板。

3. 商业模式研究价值:测试仪器行业长账期的验收付款模式,叠加下游客户高度集中的行业格局,给高速增长阶段的企业带来了巨大的现金流压力,这种模式如何优化适配,也值得深入研究。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article reviews the skyrocketing stock price of newly listed Lianxun Instrument and the hidden risks behind it. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core background: Lianxun Instrument is a leading Chinese manufacturer of optical communication and semiconductor testing equipment, and one of the few global vendors capable of mass-producing core testing instruments for 400G, 800G, and 1.6T high-speed optical modules. Since its IPO in April 2026, its share price has surged more than 20 times above the offering price in 23 trading days, briefly outpacing Kweichow Moutai to become the highest-valued A-share new stock. Investors who received one allotment still hold an unrealized profit of nearly 820,000 yuan, and the company’s latest total market capitalization exceeds 170 billion yuan.

2. Risks for retail investors: On the operational side, more than half of the company’s assets are tied up in accounts receivable and inventory. It relies heavily on a small number of key clients, faces slow collection and high bad debt risks. With a technical iteration cycle of only 12 to 18 months for optical modules, its large inventory is at high risk of devaluation. On the capital side, its trailing price-to-earnings ratio exceeds 300, far above the industry average. Free float accounts for less than 20% of total shares, and more than 80% of shares will become eligible for sale in the next three years, creating massive downside risk at current stretched valuations. Investors should avoid chasing the rally blindly.

Lianxun Instrument’s growth path as a leading Chinese high-end testing instrument brand offers valuable insights for domestic hard technology brands. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Sector and consumer trends: The AI boom has driven explosive demand for high-speed optical modules, leaving massive gaps for domestic substitution in upstream core testing instruments. With strong market demand, domestic brands that seize the window of technological breakthrough can capture substantial industry dividends. Lianxun’s nearly five-fold revenue growth in three years, turning from losses to a net profit of 174 million yuan annually, is a textbook example.

2. Channel expansion experience: Lianxun has not only secured orders from leading domestic optical module manufacturers including Zhongji InnoLight and Eoptolink, but also successfully entered the supply chains of multiple global giants. It now ranks first in market share in China’s optoelectronic device testing equipment market. Its strategy of establishing a domestic foothold before expanding globally offers a replicable path for similar brands.

3. Operational risks to watch: To capture market share, Lianxun loosened its payment terms and became overly reliant on major clients, leaving it with weak pricing power and slow collections, with half of its assets tied up in receivables and inventory. Brands must balance market expansion with risk control to avoid long-term operational vulnerabilities.

This article outlines the opportunities and risks in the upstream optical communication testing instrument sector for industry practitioners. Key insights are as follows:

1. Current market opportunities: The boom in AI computing power has driven exponential growth in demand for 800G and 1.6T high-speed optical modules, creating a massive shortage of upstream core testing instruments. Currently, only a handful of global vendors, among which very few are domestic players like Lianxun, can mass-produce high-end products. The entire sector remains a fast-growing blue ocean, and sellers with existing technical reserves still have opportunities to enter the market.

2. Actionable growth lessons: By pre-emptively developing testing technology for high-end 1.6T optical modules and seizing the policy and market window for domestic substitution, Lianxun broke the monopoly of overseas manufacturers, quickly entered the supply chains of leading domestic and international clients, and achieved explosive growth. Its path is worthy of reference for sellers in the same sector.

3. Risk warnings: The industry’s technical iteration cycle is only 12-18 months, and demand fluctuates sharply with AI-related capital expenditures. If future AI demand falls short of expectations, large inventory holdings face significant devaluation risk. Meanwhile, the downstream optical module industry is highly concentrated, leaving sellers vulnerable to over-reliance on major clients, weak pricing power, slow collections and high bad debt rates—all risks that are amplified during industry downturns.

Lianxun Instrument’s explosive growth offers clear market opportunities and operational insights for domestic high-end manufacturing facilities. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Identifiable business opportunities: Amid the current boom in demand for high-speed optical modules, upstream testing instrument manufacturers generally stock up on core components 3-6 months in advance to secure market share, and downstream demand continues to grow, bringing incremental orders to core component manufacturers. At the same time, there is still huge room for domestic substitution in high-end testing instruments, and factories with design and production capabilities can enter this high-growth sector to share industry dividends.

2. R&D and production insights: Lianxun broke foreign domination and claimed the largest domestic market share by covering core testing links across the entire optical communication industry chain and being the first to mass-produce high-end 1.6T testing instruments. This demonstrates that manufacturing facilities that persist in high-end R&D and seize the domestic substitution window can achieve leapfrog growth.

3. Operational management insights: When expanding during a sector boom, factories should not excessively loosen payment terms to win orders or stock up inventory blindly. They also need to diversify their client base to reduce dependence on a small number of major clients, avoiding the dual crisis of bad debt and inventory devaluation when the industry cools.

This article summarizes current development trends and corporate pain points in the optical communication testing instrument industry for relevant service providers. Key insights are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: The boom in large AI models has driven explosive global demand for AI computing power, spurring rapid expansion of the high-speed optical module industry and exponential growth in demand for upstream core testing instruments. Domestic manufacturers are rapidly replacing overseas products through technological breakthroughs, keeping the industry in a high-growth cycle with continuously expanding market size. This has brought a large number of new clients for supporting service providers.

2. Core client pain points: Domestic testing instrument vendors generally face two core pain points during rapid expansion: First, to capture market share, they widely accept extended payment terms, leading to surging accounts receivable, slow collections, and widespread cash flow shortages. Second, they pre-build inventory to meet explosive demand, leading to continuously rising inventory levels. Combined with the industry’s fast iteration pace, this creates high inventory devaluation risk.

3. Business opportunities for service providers: Financial service providers can develop supply chain financial products tailored to the industry’s characteristics, such as accounts receivable factoring and order pledge financing, to solve manufacturers’ cash flow problems. Supply chain management service providers can offer optimized inventory management services to help manufacturers reduce inventory devaluation risk, creating broad market opportunities.

Lianxun Instrument’s post-IPO performance and underlying issues offer insights for the operation and management of capital market platforms. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New characteristics of post-IPO tech firms: Today, specialized "little giant" tech firms aligned with AI and domestic substitution trends are easily targeted by speculative capital after listing, often seeing explosive short-term share price gains and valuations far above reasonable industry levels. In addition, most shares are under lock-up in the early listing stage, resulting in very low free float. This allows limited capital to drive outsized share price gains, increasing the risk of excessive speculation.

2. Potential risks to watch: Most newly listed shares face concentrated unlocks of restricted shares. For example, more than 80% of Lianxun’s total shares will become eligible for sale gradually over the next three years. After excessive early-stage speculation, shareholder selling after the unlock can easily trigger sharp share price volatility, harming retail investors and undermining market stability.

3. Directions for operational optimization: Platforms can strengthen risk disclosure requirements for high-valuation newly listed stocks, push companies to proactively disclose potential operational risks, and step up risk warnings for investors. They can also guide companies and existing pre-IPO shareholders to voluntarily extend lock-up periods to stabilize market expectations and avoid extreme share price volatility.

The wealth creation event from Lianxun Instrument’s IPO provides a representative case study for research on China’s domestic high-end instrument industry and capital market pricing. Key research insights are as follows:

1. New industry trends: The AI computing boom has driven upward growth across the entire optical module industry chain. Domestic leading players have achieved technological breakthroughs in the upstream core testing instrument segment, breaking the long-standing monopoly of overseas manufacturers. Domestic leaders have already entered the supply chains of global giants, markedly accelerating the domestic substitution process. In addition, Suzhou has developed an industrial and capital ecosystem conducive to the growth of high-tech hard tech enterprises, with state-owned capital making early and continued investments to nurture multiple leading players in the optical module sector. This industrial incubation model merits in-depth research.

2. New issues in industry and capital markets: Capital markets currently assign extreme valuation premiums to high-quality domestic substitution plays in the AI upstream. Lianxun’s trailing P/E ratio exceeds 300, far above the electronic measurement instrument industry’s average of 55-75x, showing clear overvaluation that has already priced in far future growth. The extremely low free float in the early post-IPO stage amplifies the impact of market sentiment on share prices, inflating valuation bubbles, and allows industry growth to mask long-term weaknesses in working capital management and client structure.

3. Research value of the business model: The testing instrument industry’s long-payment-cycle acceptance-based payment model, combined with the highly concentrated downstream client structure, creates enormous cash flow pressure for fast-growing firms. How to optimize and adapt this business model is also a topic worthy of in-depth research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

今年的A股市场,“光模块”快速出圈,引爆一轮又一轮的行情,联讯仪器就是其中一员。

作为相关概念股之一,联讯仪器从2026年4月上市以来股价一路上扬,5月18日,联讯仪器盘中涨超15%,股价一度触及1361元/股,当时超过贵州茅台成为A股“新股王”。

此后,公司股价继续上涨,截至5月29日收盘,联讯仪器股价报收于1719.95元/股,总市值站上1700亿元大关。

此时,距离这家公司4月24日登陆上交所科创板,仅仅过去了23个交易日。而相较于81.88元/股的发行价,涨幅已超过20倍。这意味着,如果投资者中一签(500股)并持有至今,浮盈已接近82万元。

只是,在这场充满狂欢意味的财富盛宴背后,支撑起超1700亿元市值的公司,真实基本面究竟如何?高速增长的光环之下,又隐藏着哪些值得警惕的风险?

01 上市后股价暴涨,催生暴富神话

作为国产光通信和半导体测试仪器龙头,联讯仪器身上有很多标签。

它既是业内极少数覆盖光通信产业链中模块、芯片、晶圆等核心环节测试需求的厂商;又是全球少数、国内极少数量产供货400G、800G、1.6T高速光模块核心测试仪器的厂商;还是全球第二家推出目前业内最高水平1.6T光模块全部核心测试仪器的厂商。

目前,联讯仪器备受外界关注的光通信业务主要是给光通信芯片和模块“体检”。

具体而言,每一根接入千家万户的光纤、每一个支撑AI算力的数据中心光模块,在出厂前都必须经过严苛“体检”。从采样示波器、误码分析仪到时钟恢复单元、晶圆级老化系统,联讯仪器的全系列产品构成了AI算力基础设施建设中不可或缺的关键一环。

可以说,“淘金热”里,挖到金子的是少数,卖铲子的稳赚不赔,而联讯仪器就是光通信赛道里最大的“铲商”。

其不仅拿下了中际旭创、新易盛、光迅科技、海信集团等国内主流光通信厂商的订单,还成功打入了Lumentum、Coherent、Broadcom、日本住友等国际巨头的供应链。根据Frost&Sullivan数据,2024年公司在中国光电子器件测试设备市场份额中排名第一。

技术优势最终转化为了资本市场上的财富效应。5月29日,联讯仪器股价收于1719.95元/股,总市值达到1766亿元。这场声势浩大的资本盛宴,让无数参与者在一个月内实现了财富暴涨。

而最先完成财富升值的,自然是公司的三位实控人。

联讯仪器于2017年3月由胡海洋(潘易鹏代持)、杨建发起成立。目前,胡海洋、杨建与黄建军三位股东达成一致行动协议,为上市公司共同实控人。上市后,三人分别直接持有联讯仪器15.41%、4.37%、5.39%的股份。

按5月29日收盘价计算,三人仅直接持股的数量价值就已超过440亿元,实现了从技术工程师到百亿富豪的跨越。

公司的核心员工群体也同享这场盛宴。联讯仪器设立了联睿光通、博睿光通和博恒睿哲三个员工持股平台,其中,联睿光通有47名合伙人,博恒睿哲有45名合伙人,博睿光通有6名合伙人,覆盖了公司的高管和核心技术人员。

上市后,这三个员工持股平台合计持有公司15.91%的股份,按当前市值计算约为281亿元。这意味着,平均每位持股员工的股票价值超过2.8亿元,不少员工一夜之间实现了财务自由。

早期投资人同样赚得盆满钵满。例如,在IPO之前,联讯仪器完成了7轮融资。其中,毅达资本是最早投资联讯仪器的机构之一,2019年公司还处于创立初期、名不见经传时就果断下注,如今浮盈超过300倍。

值得一提的是,联讯仪器与天孚通信、东山精密等近期风头正劲的光模块龙头一样,都诞生于苏州。苏州国资及本地产业资本在其成长过程中扮演了至关重要的角色:枫桥投资、苏高新创投等苏州国资旗下基金早在公司发展初期就已入局,并在后续轮次中持续加码;甚至连知名教育博主张雪峰,也通过参股苏州永鑫融耀创业投资合伙企业间接持有股份。

那么,支撑起超1700亿元市值的联讯仪器,究竟有怎样的业绩表现?高速增长的背后,是否又隐藏着潜在风险?

02 三年营收增长五倍,一半资产被“套牢”

近几年,联讯仪器的业绩表现的确出色。

2022年至2025年,公司营业收入从2.14亿元飙升至11.94亿元,三年时间累计增长近五倍;归母净利润也从2022年的亏损3807万元,至2025年的盈利1.74亿元,扭亏为盈。

不过,在冲击IPO时,联讯仪器的资产质量却始终备受市场质疑。截至2025年前三季度,联讯仪器应收账款和存货两项合计达到8.21亿元,占总资产(16.10亿元)比例已高达50.97%。

这意味着,公司超过一半的资产,都被未收回的货款和未卖出的库存“套牢”。

首先是持续高涨的应收账款。随着营收规模的快速扩张,联讯仪器的应收账款余额从2022年的8962.97万元,一路增至2025年三季度末的4亿元,两年多累计增长了3.5倍,占当期营业收入的比例始终维持在30%-50%的高位。

更令外界担忧的是,除2024年外,公司的应收账款周转率均低于行业平均水平:2022年至2025年前三季度,公司应收账款周转率分别为2.73次、2.45次、4.04次和3.28次,而同行可比公司的平均水平在3.37次至4.52次之间。

回款速度缓慢直接导致了应收账款逾期金额的不断攀升。2022年-2025年前三季度,公司逾期应收账款从2022年的2743.99万元,增至2025年前三季度的1.56亿元。

逾期账款已经开始给公司造成实际损失,上海诚佃电子科技有限公司的1005.46万元货款,因长期无法收回已被全额计提坏账准备;2025年7月,公司还因海科电力拖欠224.60万元货款,向苏州市虎丘区人民法院提起了诉讼。

造成这一现象的原因,既有行业共性,也有公司自身的问题。一方面,测试设备行业普遍采用“发货-安装调试-客户验收-确认收入-付款”的商业模式,验收周期通常为3-6个月,部分大客户甚至长达9-12个月。

2024年以来,全球800G/1.6T光模块需求呈指数级增长,下游客户从“按需采购”转为“抢货模式”,联讯仪器为了抢占市场份额,不得不接受更长的付款账期,并提前3-6个月备货核心零部件。

另一方面,公司对少数大客户存在严重依赖,中际旭创、新易盛等前五大客户各报告期内平均贡献了超四成的收入。面对行业集中度极高的下游客户,联讯仪器在付款条件谈判中处于相对弱势地位。一旦未来光模块行业景气度下滑,客户资金链紧张,公司将面临巨大的回款压力和坏账风险。

与应收账款同步攀升的还有存货。招股书显示,2025年9月末,联讯仪器存货高达4.54亿元,占流动资产的36.16%。

应收账款和存货的双重积压,直接导致了公司经营现金流的持续恶化。2025年前三季度,公司的扣非后归母净利润为9293.49万元,但经营现金流净额却为-2548.27万元。

上市之后,现金流、存货问题成为了投资者关注的重点。在2026年第一季度业绩会上,投资者重点询问了现金流和存货问题。

2026年第一季度,联讯仪器实现营业收入4.88亿元,同比增长142.52%;归母净利润为1.19亿元,同比增长515.17%;经营现金流净额为8341.26万元,较2025年同期的-5256.47万元实现由负转正,经营现金流质量显著提升。

不过,经营现金流的改善并没有掩盖存货持续高企的隐忧。2026年一季度末,其存货较年初显著增加,由去年一季度的5.01亿元增加至7.51亿元。对此,公司管理层解释这主要因订单量增加、发出商品增加、部分原材料备货及部分新产品生产布局所致。

而这恰恰是联讯仪器面临的最大风险之一,光模块行业的技术迭代周期已经缩短至12-18个月,一旦AI算力需求不及预期,或者下一代技术路线发生变化,公司手中价格高昂的存货,随时可能面临大幅跌价的风险。

客观而言,联讯仪器在1.6T光模块测试领域的技术领先优势确实让其充分享受了AI算力爆发的红利,2026年一季度经营现金流的改善也表明公司经营质量有所提升,但行业红利也掩盖了公司在营运资金管理和客户结构上的长期短板。

未来,一旦光模块行业进入下行阶段,公司不仅会面临订单锐减,还将承受应收账款坏账和存货跌价的双重压力。如何在高速增长的同时提升资产质量,将是联讯仪器上市后面临的重大考验。

03 狂欢背后,流通股票少之又少

除了经营层面的隐忧,这场造富神话本身也值得冷静审视。

A股历史上,千元股往往承载着市场上最高的期待,但不少曾经的千元股后续表现也提醒着投资者,高估值往往伴随着高波动。贵州茅台在2021年登顶2600元/股后,股价曾经历较大幅度调整;石头科技、极米科技、禾迈股份等多家公司在突破千元关口后,也出现了不同程度的股价回落。

历史经验表明,当一只股票的估值被推到极致时,对公司本身的容错率会显著降低。

联讯仪器当前的估值水平,正处于行业的绝对高位。截至5月29日,根据国泰海通对公司2026年5.62亿元净利润的预测,其对应动态市盈率超过300倍。这一估值水平不仅显著高于电子测量仪器行业55-75倍的平均区间,也大幅领先于可比公司普源精电(55-65倍PE)和鼎阳科技(45倍PE)。

这意味着,当前股价已经包含了市场对公司未来多年高速增长的乐观预期。如果未来AI算力需求出现波动,或者公司业绩增速不及市场预期,股价可能面临估值回归的压力。

此外,公司特殊的股本结构也值得关注。截至目前,联讯仪器总股本1.03亿股,而流通股本仅为1929.61万股,流通市值约332亿元,这主要是由于上市不久,多数股份仍在禁售期。也就是说,支撑起1800亿元总市值的,只有约300亿元的真实筹码在市场上交易。

这种不足20%的极低流通比例,使得少量资金就能对股价产生较大影响,也让股价更容易受到市场情绪和短期资金流动的左右。

与之相对应的,是未来数年内陆续到来的限售股解禁潮。根据公告披露,占总股本约80%的限售股将在未来三年内逐步获得流通权:

2026年10月26日:约123.7万股首发机构配售股份解禁;

2027年4月26日:约3420万股首发原股东限售股份解禁,占总股本的33.31%;

2028年4月24日:约77万股解禁;

2029年4月24日:约4717万股解禁,占总股本的45.94%。

这意味着,11个月之后,市场上的流通股票就将大幅增加,这些解禁股票持有人将拥有减持套现的选择权。如果届时市场情绪发生变化,或者部分股东选择兑现收益,市场的承接能力将面临考验。

对此,「子弹财经」也向公司发出采访函,是否会考虑延长锁定期,但截至发稿,公司仍未回复。

客观而言,联讯仪器无疑是国产测试设备领域的龙头企业,它在1.6T光模块测试领域的技术突破,打破了国外厂商的长期垄断,也让中国在AI算力产业链上游拥有了重要的话语权。

只是,资本市场的定价往往是前瞻性的,过高的预期有时会透支企业未来的成长空间。对于联讯仪器来说,上市只是一个新的起点。股价的短期涨跌更多反映的是市场情绪,而企业的长期价值最终还是要依靠持续的技术创新和稳健的业绩来支撑。

如何在享受行业红利的同时,不断提升自身的核心竞争力和抗风险能力,用实实在在的业绩回报投资者,将是联讯仪器未来需要持续回答的命题。

注:文/于莹,文章来源:子弹财经,本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:子弹财经

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0