广告
加载中

苦熬五年后化工价格大涨 东方盛虹扣非后净利润增长超14倍

段楠楠 2026-09-17 09:19
段楠楠 2026/09/17 09:19

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心为你梳理民营化工龙头东方盛虹业绩爆发背后的关键信息与相关风险提示,帮你快速把握核心干货。

1. 业绩核心数据:2026年上半年公司实现营收699.24亿元,同比增长14.79%,扣非净利润43.16亿元,同比增长超14倍,是成立以来最好的半年度业绩。这一业绩主要因地缘政治带动原油及化工品价格上涨,公司提前囤积低价原油、搭配油/煤/气多原料路线控成本,推动产品毛利率大幅提升,而此前受化工品价格下行影响,公司2024、2025年连续亏损,已苦熬五年。

2. 企业关键动向:业绩回暖后公司计划投资近168亿元扩产高端化工项目,与年初“暂无大型新项目”的表态形成反差,目前公司资产负债率超80%,有息负债超1380亿元,扩产资金大概率依赖对外借款,后续负债压力可能进一步上升。

3. 相关风险提示:当前公司股价较2021年高点仍跌超65%,实控人累计增持37亿元稳市值,但后续毛利率能否维持、扩产能否落地仍存不确定性,需警惕相关投资波动。

化工领域品牌商可从东方盛虹的经营路径与行业周期变化中,获得产品布局、成本抗风险、高端化发展的实操参考。

1. 产品研发与布局方向:要坚定走差异化高端化路线,避开低附加值、同质化的产能红海。东方盛虹此次168亿元扩产瞄准TDI、HDI、PC聚碳酸酯等技术、政策壁垒较高的高端芳烃产业链项目,契合行业“反内卷”政策导向,和此前PTA、PX等过剩产能的布局逻辑有本质区别。

2. 成本与定价抗风险经验:可参考东方盛虹的多原料供应体系,搭建油/煤/气并行的原料结构,同时在原料低价期合理储备库存,对冲地缘政治等突发因素带来的原料价格波动,避免成本变动直接冲击产品定价与毛利率。2026年上半年原油价格同比涨29%,公司正是靠这套体系将石化新材料业务毛利率做到17.93%。

3. 周期判断提醒:此轮化工品价格上行是国内反内卷去产能、海外产能受冲突影响缩减共同作用的结果,品牌需理性判断周期,不要盲目跟风扩产通用品类,要围绕自身产业链做好强链补链,提升高附加值产品占比。

化工品类相关卖家可从本次行业周期波动与龙头企业动作中,精准把握市场机会、提前规避经营风险。

1. 增长机会提示:当前国内化工行业推进“反内卷”政策,低附加值同质化产能持续出清,叠加地缘冲突导致中东、欧洲部分化工产能缩减,苯乙烯、PTA、乙二醇等产品供需格局改善,是相关品类的增长窗口;TDI、HDI、PC聚碳酸酯等高端新材料品类后续随龙头产能落地,供给将逐步补充,卖家可提前锁定货源布局。

2. 经营风险提示:此轮化工品价格上涨受地缘事件驱动,价格波动极强,需警惕龙头企业低价原料库存耗尽后,成本上行带来的产品价格波动,不要盲目在高位囤货,避免价格回调造成库存损失;同时需规避通用化纤、常规石化原料等过剩品类的价格战风险。

3. 可借鉴经营思路:参考龙头多源采购控成本的逻辑,拓展多元供货渠道,避免单一依赖某一区域或某类原料供应商,平抑采购成本波动,稳定经营利润。

化工生产类工厂可从龙头企业的产能布局、成本管控逻辑中,找准产品生产方向、挖掘商业合作机会、优化自身生产体系。

1. 产品生产方向参考:当前产业政策鼓励高端化、高附加值项目落地,限制同质化低附加值产能扩张,工厂可优先布局TDI、HDI、PC聚碳酸酯、双酚A等高端芳烃产业链的配套产品及加工服务,避开PTA、PX等已出现过严重产能过剩的通用石化品类,契合政策导向的项目更易获得落地支持。

2. 生产优化经验:可参考东方盛虹的多原料并行生产方案,改造生产线适配油、煤、气等多种原料,根据不同原料的市场价格灵活调整原料结构,同时在原料价格低位期建立合理安全库存,对冲地缘冲突等突发因素带来的原料涨价风险,稳定生产毛利率。

3. 商业机会提示:东方盛虹此次168亿元扩产项目包含200万吨/年焦化原料预处理装置、10套配套化工装置,项目落地过程中将释放大量配套生产、装置建设、原料供应的合作需求,产业链相关工厂可提前对接,争取合作机会。

化工行业服务商可结合龙头企业的经营痛点与行业发展趋势,找准服务切入方向、优化适配的解决方案。

1. 行业趋势判断:当前大化工行业处于周期反转+高端化转型的关键阶段,一方面地缘政治冲突加剧原料价格波动,企业对供应链稳定、成本管控的需求大幅提升;另一方面在“反内卷”政策引导下,行业正从通用产能规模扩张,转向高技术壁垒、高附加值的新材料、精细化工项目布局,相关服务市场空间广阔。

2. 客户痛点梳理:当前化工企业普遍存在三类核心痛点,一是高负债扩张下的资金压力,东方盛虹目前资产负债率超80%,有息负债超1380亿元,此次168亿元扩产仍有较大资金缺口;二是原料价格波动剧烈,单一原料供应模式易造成成本冲击;三是高端化工项目落地涉及技术、资质、审批等多重门槛,推进难度大。

3. 解决方案方向:服务商可针对性开发服务产品,比如面向资金需求设计多元融资方案,面向原料波动痛点搭建多源供应链匹配、价格风险管理服务,面向高端项目落地提供技术对接、政策申报、项目建设配套服务,匹配企业转型期的真实需求。

服务化工产业的平台商,可结合当前行业周期特征与企业发展需求,优化平台招商方向、完善运营服务体系、做好经营风向规避。

1. 招商与品类布局方向:重点引入高端化工新材料、芳烃产业链高附加值产品的相关商家,覆盖TDI、HDI、PC聚碳酸酯、高端EVA材料等品类,匹配行业高端化转型、反内卷出清低端产能的趋势;逐步优化商家结构,减少同质化严重、产能过剩的通用石化、低端化纤品类的低质商家入驻。

2. 运营服务优化方向:针对化工企业普遍面临的原料价格波动大、资金压力强的痛点,搭建多源供应商匹配系统,帮助企业对接不同产地、不同类型的供货渠道;联合金融机构推出适配的供应链金融服务,缓解上下游中小企业的资金压力;上线原料价格监测、行业周期预警工具,帮助商家合理安排库存、预判价格波动。

3. 风险规避要点:建立化工品价格异常波动预警机制,防范商家高位囤货带来的违约、资金链断裂风险;严格审核平台上扩产类项目的合作信息,核验项目资质,避免低水平重复建设的违规项目在平台发布信息,契合行业政策导向。

东方盛虹的经营案例为大化工产业研究提供了典型微观样本,折射出当前行业的新动向、新问题,具备较高研究价值。

1. 产业新动向观察:一是民营大化工龙头经历五年下行周期后,借助地缘政治驱动的化工品价格上涨实现业绩反转,2026年上半年大化工成为国内盈利增速最快的行业之一;二是在“反内卷”政策引导下,龙头扩产逻辑从此前的通用产能规模扩张,转向高技术壁垒、高附加值的产业链延链补链项目;三是此轮化工品价格上行叠加海外产能收缩、国内产能出清双重影响,周期驱动因素更趋复杂。

2. 行业新问题梳理:一是龙头高杠杆扩张模式的可持续性存疑,东方盛虹五年投资性现金流流出超1260亿元,资产负债率超80%,有息负债超1380亿元,强周期波动下经营风险较高;二是地缘冲突加剧化工品价格波动,企业盈利稳定性面临更大挑战;三是资本市场对高负债扩产认可度较低,即使业绩大幅增长,公司股价较历史高点仍跌超65%。

3. 研究启示:产业政策需进一步引导企业理性扩产,遏制低水平重复建设,支持企业搭建多源原料供应体系提升抗风险能力;龙头“全产业链布局+多原料路线+高端化转型”的商业模式,其周期适配性值得长期跟踪。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article breaks down the key drivers behind the earnings surge of Eastern Shenghong, a leading private chemical enterprise in China, alongside relevant risk warnings to help readers quickly grasp core takeaways.

1. Core performance metrics: In the first half of 2026, the company recorded revenue of 69.924 billion yuan, up 14.79% year on year, and net profit after non-recurring gains and losses of 4.316 billion yuan, representing a more than 14-fold year-on-year increase and marking its strongest half-year performance since founding. The results were primarily driven by geopolitical factors pushing up prices of crude oil and chemical products; the company stockpiled low-cost crude in advance and leveraged an oil/coal/gas multi-feedstock production system to control costs, significantly lifting gross margins. Prior to this, the company suffered consecutive losses in 2024 and 2025 amid a chemical price downturn, after struggling through a five-year industry downcycle.

2. Key corporate moves: Following the earnings recovery, the company plans to invest nearly 16.8 billion yuan to expand high-end chemical production capacity, a sharp reversal from its statement at the start of the year that it had "no major new projects in the pipeline". With an asset-liability ratio above 80% and interest-bearing debt exceeding 138 billion yuan, the expansion is expected to rely heavily on external borrowing, which may further increase its debt pressure going forward.

3. Risk warnings: The company’s current share price remains more than 65% below its 2021 peak. While the actual controller has cumulatively increased holdings by 3.7 billion yuan to stabilize market value, uncertainties remain over whether current gross margins can be sustained and whether the capacity expansion will be delivered as planned, warranting caution against related investment volatility.

Chemical industry brands can draw practical references on product portfolio planning, cost resilience and high-end transformation from Eastern Shenghong’s operational strategy and evolving industry cycles.

1. Product R&D and portfolio direction: Brands should firmly pursue differentiated, high-end development paths to avoid the red ocean of low-value-added, homogeneous capacity. Eastern Shenghong’s 16.8 billion yuan expansion targets high-end aromatic industry chain projects with high technical and policy barriers, including TDI, HDI and polycarbonate (PC). This aligns with the industry’s “anti-involution” policy guidance, marking a fundamental shift from its earlier investment logic of adding overcapacity in PTA and PX segments.

2. Cost and pricing resilience lessons: Brands can reference Eastern Shenghong’s multi-feedstock supply system to build an integrated oil/coal/gas raw material structure, while maintaining reasonable inventory reserves during low-price periods to hedge against raw material price volatility caused by unexpected shocks such as geopolitical events, preventing cost fluctuations from directly eroding product pricing and gross margins. In H1 2026, crude oil prices rose 29% year on year, yet the company still achieved a 17.93% gross margin for its petrochemical new materials business, supported by this system.

3. Cycle judgment reminders: This round of chemical price upturn stems from the combined effect of domestic overcapacity reduction under anti-involution policies and overseas production curtailments driven by geopolitical conflicts. Brands should assess industry cycles rationally, avoid blind expansion into general product categories, and focus on strengthening and completing gaps in their own industrial chains to raise the share of high-value-added products.

Chemical product sellers can accurately identify market opportunities and proactively mitigate operational risks by observing current industry cycle fluctuations and leading players’ strategic moves.

1. Growth opportunity alerts: As China’s chemical industry advances anti-involution policies, low-value-added homogeneous capacity continues to exit the market. Combined with geopolitical conflicts reducing chemical production capacity in the Middle East and Europe, the supply-demand balance for products including styrene, PTA and ethylene glycol is improving, creating a growth window for these categories. For high-end new materials such as TDI, HDI and polycarbonate, supply will gradually expand as leading players’ new capacity comes online, allowing sellers to secure supply sources and plan layout in advance.

2. Operational risk alerts: This round of chemical price increases is driven by geopolitical events and subject to extreme volatility. Sellers should guard against product price swings caused by rising costs once leading players exhaust their low-cost raw material inventories, and avoid blind stockpiling at price peaks to prevent inventory losses from price corrections. They should also steer clear of price war risks in oversupplied segments such as general synthetic fibers and conventional petrochemical feedstocks.

3. Applicable operational strategies: Drawing on leading players’ logic of multi-source procurement to control costs, sellers should diversify supply channels rather than relying solely on suppliers in a single region or for a single raw material type, to smooth out procurement cost fluctuations and stabilize operating profits.

Chemical manufacturing plants can identify optimal production directions, explore business cooperation opportunities and optimize their own production systems by studying leading enterprises’ capacity layout and cost control logic.

1. Production direction references: Current industrial policies encourage the launch of high-end, high-value-added projects while restricting expansion of homogeneous, low-value-added capacity. Plants can prioritize supporting products and processing services for the high-end aromatic industry chain, including TDI, HDI, polycarbonate and bisphenol A, while avoiding general petrochemical segments with severe overcapacity such as PTA and PX. Projects aligned with policy guidance are more likely to obtain approval and support for implementation.

2. Production optimization lessons: Plants can reference Eastern Shenghong’s multi-feedstock production model, retrofitting production lines to adapt to oil, coal and gas feedstocks and flexibly adjusting input structures based on real-time market prices of different raw materials. At the same time, they should build reasonable safety stock levels during periods of low raw material prices to hedge against price hike risks from unexpected shocks such as geopolitical conflicts and stabilize production gross margins.

3. Business opportunity alerts: Eastern Shenghong’s 16.8 billion yuan expansion project includes a 2 million ton/year coking raw material pretreatment unit and 10 supporting chemical facilities. Project implementation will generate large demand for supporting production, equipment construction and raw material supply, presenting cooperation opportunities for relevant factories along the industrial chain to engage in early outreach.

Chemical industry service providers can identify service entry points and optimize tailored solutions by aligning with leading enterprises’ operational pain points and industry development trends.

1. Industry trend assessment: The bulk chemical sector is at a critical inflection point of cycle reversal and high-end transformation. On one hand, geopolitical conflicts are intensifying raw material price volatility, sharply increasing corporate demand for supply chain stability and cost control. On the other hand, guided by anti-involution policies, the industry is shifting from scale expansion of general capacity to development of high-technical-barrier, high-value-added new materials and fine chemical projects, creating broad market space for related services.

2. Client pain point analysis: Chemical enterprises currently face three core pain points. First, funding pressure from high-leverage expansion: Eastern Shenghong has an asset-liability ratio above 80% and interest-bearing debt exceeding 138 billion yuan, leaving a significant funding gap for its 16.8 billion yuan expansion. Second, drastic raw material price volatility, with single-feedstock supply models highly vulnerable to cost shocks. Third, high-end chemical projects face multiple barriers related to technology, qualification and approval, making implementation difficult.

3. Solution development directions: Service providers can develop targeted offerings, such as diversified financing solutions for funding needs, multi-source supply chain matching and price risk management services to address raw material volatility, and technology matching, policy application and project construction supporting services for high-end project implementation, to meet enterprises’ real demands during the transformation period.

Platforms serving the chemical industry can optimize merchant recruitment strategies, improve operational service systems and mitigate operational risks by aligning with current industry cycle characteristics and enterprise development demands.

1. Recruitment and category layout priorities: Focus on onboarding merchants related to high-end chemical new materials and high-value-added aromatic industry chain products, covering categories such as TDI, HDI, polycarbonate and high-end EVA materials, to match the industry’s trend of high-end transformation and low-end capacity elimination under anti-involution policies. Gradually optimize merchant structure by reducing low-quality merchants in homogeneous, oversupplied segments such as general petrochemicals and low-end synthetic fibers.

2. Operational service optimization directions: Address the prevalent pain points of sharp raw material price volatility and tight funding pressure for chemical enterprises by building a multi-source supplier matching system to connect enterprises with supply channels across different origins and types. Collaborate with financial institutions to launch tailored supply chain finance services to ease funding pressure for upstream and downstream small and medium-sized enterprises. Launch raw material price monitoring and industry cycle early-warning tools to help merchants plan inventory reasonably and anticipate price fluctuations.

3. Risk mitigation priorities: Establish an early-warning mechanism for abnormal chemical price fluctuations to prevent risks of contract default and capital chain rupture caused by merchants stockpiling at price peaks. Strictly review cooperation information for expansion projects listed on the platform, verify project qualifications, and block information releases for non-compliant projects involving low-level redundant construction, to align with industry policy guidance.

Eastern Shenghong’s operational case provides a typical micro-level sample for bulk chemical industry research, reflecting new trends and emerging issues in the current sector with high research value.

1. Emerging industry trend observations: First, leading private bulk chemical enterprises have achieved earnings reversals after a five-year downcycle, supported by geopolitically driven rises in chemical product prices; the bulk chemical sector became one of China’s fastest-profit-growing industries in H1 2026. Second, guided by anti-involution policies, leading players’ capacity expansion logic has shifted from previous scale expansion of general capacity to high-technical-barrier, high-value-added projects that extend and strengthen industrial supply chains. Third, this round of chemical price upturn is driven by the dual effects of overseas capacity contraction and domestic capacity elimination, making cycle drivers more complex.

2. Emerging industry issue analysis: First, the sustainability of leading players’ high-leverage expansion model is questionable: Eastern Shenghong recorded more than 126 billion yuan in cumulative investment cash outflows over five years, with an asset-liability ratio above 80% and interest-bearing debt exceeding 138 billion yuan, exposing it to high operational risks amid strong cyclical volatility. Second, geopolitical conflicts are intensifying chemical price volatility, posing greater challenges to the stability of corporate earnings. Third, capital markets show low recognition of debt-funded expansion; even with sharp earnings growth, the company’s share price remains more than 65% below its historical peak.

3. Research implications: Industrial policies should further guide enterprises to expand capacity rationally, curb low-level redundant construction, and support enterprises in building multi-source raw material supply systems to improve risk resilience. The cycle adaptability of leading players’ business model, characterized by full industrial chain layout, multi-feedstock routes and high-end transformation, warrants long-term tracking.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

8月29日,国内民营化工巨头东方盛虹公布了2026年半年报。在地缘政治影响下,2026年上半年化工产品价格持续上涨,因此东方盛虹业绩十分亮眼,归母净利润增长超10倍。

在利润大爆发的背景下,东方盛虹发布了近168亿元的扩产计划。有意思的是在年初东方盛虹接受调研时还表示,未来“资本开支逐步下降,暂无大型新项目”,而两个月后抛出百亿级投资计划。

过去几年,东方盛虹是扩产最积极的化工企业之一,由于持续加杠杆扩产,2026年上半年,公司负债规模1700亿元,资产负债率超80%,即便如此公司仍计划投资近168亿元。

根据外界预测,此次扩产东方盛虹大部分资金仍需要对外借款,届时公司负债率恐进一步上升。

在化工产品价格波动加大的背景下,东方盛虹的扩产是会增厚公司利润,还是会拖累公司业绩?

01 苦熬五年后化工价格大涨,扣非后净利润增长超14倍

2026年上半年,大化工行业是国内盈利增速最快的行业之一。作为国内民营大化工龙头企业,东方盛虹交出的业绩极为亮眼。

数据显示,2026年上半年东方盛虹实现营业收入699.24亿元,同比增长14.79%,实现扣非后净利润43.16亿元,同比增长1488.19%。

公司扣非后净利润增长14倍以上,与旗下产品价格大涨有很大关系。作为国内超大型化工企业,东方盛虹是国内少数覆盖炼化一体化、新能源新材料、聚酯化纤三大业务的化工企业。

旗下产品包含乙烯、丙烯、PX、苯、醋酸乙烯、乙二醇、苯酚、丙酮等石化原料,新能源新材料则主要是EVA。

2026年上半年,在地缘政治冲突影响下,全球原油价格大涨。以布伦特原油价格为例,2026年上半年布伦特原油现货平均价格为92.8美元/桶,同比上涨29%。

在原油价格上涨带动下,苯乙烯、PTA、乙二醇等原油化工产品价格持续上涨。以PTA价格为例,2026年上半年PTA均价为6161元/吨,同比上涨23.7%。

由于在原油价格较低的时候,东方盛虹囤积了大量的低价原油。加之为了应对高油价,东方盛虹通过油/煤/气三种原料并行的方式,减少原油价格上涨导致的生产成本上升,因此2026年上半年东方盛虹产品毛利率大幅上升。

如公司第一大业务石化及化工新材料2026年上半年实现营业收入418.31亿元,毛利率高达17.93%,同比增长12.72%。

在化工产品毛利率大幅提升带动下,东方盛虹扣非后净利润增长14倍以上,该利润也是东方盛虹自成立以来表现最好的半年度业绩。

实际上,此前由于连续借款扩产,导致公司利息支出暴增,加之2021年以后化工品价格持续下行,东方盛虹利润表现一直都不理想。

2021年公司扣非后净利润达12.76亿元后便持续下滑,2024年及2025年公司扣非后净利润更是分别亏损26.54亿元、5.43亿元。

近期,随着化工产品价格的回暖,苦熬五年的东方盛虹终于等到了业绩的爆发。

不过在地缘政治冲突影响下,化工类产品价格波动巨大,后续相关产品能否继续维持高价,公司低价原材料库存消耗完毕后,高达17%以上的毛利率还能否维持,依旧存在较大的疑问。

对此,东方盛虹表示,石化新材料产品的盈利水平及毛利率是由原材料成本、市场供需格局、行业景气度及公司产品结构等多重因素综合决定的,原油价格波动只是影响因素之一,不能简单的将其与毛利率水平直接挂钩。

同时,公司新材料产品的原材料包括甲醇等,原料来源多样,受原油价格波动影响更小,充分体现了公司多头并举的原料来源优势。

02 斥资近168亿元扩产,持续扩张后有息负债超1300亿元

虽然扣非后净利润增长超14倍,但投资者对于东方盛虹依旧心存疑虑,核心原因便是公司仍在对外投资扩产。

2026年4月,东方盛虹接连发布公告,计划投资167.85亿元扩产。公告内容显示,此次扩产分为两个项目,第一个是公司全资子公司盛虹炼化(连云港)有限公司投资34.55亿元,建设200万吨/年焦化原料预处理装置及配套设施。根据测算,达产后该项目年均营收20.22亿元,年均利润总额3.88亿元。

第二个项目是东方盛虹三级全资子公司连云港虹科新材料有限公司,与连云港徐圩新区管委会签署合作意向协议书,拟投资133.30亿元建设芳烃产业链提质增效项目。

根据公告,该项目包含15万吨/年TDI、5万吨/年HDI、30万吨/年PC聚碳酸酯、24万吨/年双酚A、24万吨/年烧碱,配套光气、合成气等合计10套装置。

公司如此大规模的扩产引起了市场关注,有意思的是在1月30日接受投资者调研时东方盛虹公开表示,公司目前仅有EVA、涤纶长丝等少量项目仍处于建设期,其他暂时没有新的大型项目建设规划。

距离调研仅过去两个多月的时间,东方盛虹便抛出了近168亿元的扩产计划。

对此,东方盛虹表示,公司秉持“1+N”发展战略,不断深化高端化、高附加值产业发展,持续“强链、延链、补链”,意向投资新建芳烃产业链提质增效项目。

该项目政策壁垒和技术壁垒较高,属于符合产业政策导向的高端化产业项目,与“反内卷”政策所针对的同质化、低附加值项目有本质区别。此外,该项目尚处于意向阶段,尚在论证过程中,待项目具备实施条件后,公司还需提交董事会进行决策后实施。

前几年由于荣盛石化、东方盛虹等化工巨头大幅扩产,国内化工产品一度陷入产能过剩的困境,PTA、PX等化工产品价格长期低迷。

在化工行业产能过剩的背景下,工信部等部委主导了化工行业的反内卷,加之在地缘政治冲突影响下原油价格大涨,中东部分化工厂被袭击、欧洲化工厂因能源问题产能缩减,化工产品价格才得以企稳上升。

事实上,自2020年以来东方盛虹扩产规模在行业就排名前列。2021年,东方盛虹并购斯尔邦花费了143.6亿元;2022年公司投资聚烯烃弹性体(POE)和锂电池原料项目,花了284.14亿元。2022年投资二级子公司盛虹炼化年处理1600万吨原油的大炼化项目,东方盛虹的投资更是超过600亿元。

在此影响下,东方盛虹投资性现金流连续流出。2020年至2024年,东方盛虹投资性现金流净流出分别为175.8亿元、410.1亿元、332.7亿元、220.5亿元、121亿元,五年时间公司投资性现金流流出超1260亿元。

为了获取对外扩产资金,据Wind数据,东方盛虹自上市以来募资1766.35亿元。其中通过资本市场直接融资387.03亿元,通过向银行金融机构借款1379.32亿元。

在此影响下,截至2026年6月30日,东方盛虹有息负债规模超1380亿元,资产负债率近80%。即便如此,东方盛虹依旧计划斥巨资扩产。目前,因为方案未正式落地,后续公司将以何种形式获得资金完成投资,仍是未知数。

03 股价五年跌超65%,实控人控股企业为稳市值增持近37亿元

虽然2026年上半年扣非后净利润创历史新高,但公司股价较巅峰期仍有较大差距。在股价下跌影响下,实控人缪汉根、朱红梅夫妇身家蒸发上千亿元。

公开资料显示,东方盛虹前身是缪汉根接手村里的一家名为盛虹砂洗厂的印染小厂。在缪汉根带领下,仅数年的时间,盛虹已成长为一家旗下拥有7家印染厂且个个盈利的企业集团。

2002年,缪汉根把目光投向了产业链的上游环节——化纤行业。此后,公司陆续斥资投建了熔体直纺项目、专业PTT(聚酯类新型纤维)等项目。

后续,公司又将业务拓展至石油炼化行业,2018年底,旗下子公司盛虹炼化1600万吨/年一体化项目正式开工,2022年该项目全面投产。

在持续扩产带动下,东方盛虹经营规模逐渐扩大,营业收入大幅上升。2019年,东方盛虹营业收入为248.9亿元,2023年公司营业收入上升至1404亿元,年复合增长率超54%。

因为利润持续提升,加之东方盛虹是并购了国内最大的光伏级EVA材料供应商斯尔邦,2021年新能源爆火时,公司股价一度上涨至41元/股以上,市值一度突破2700亿元。

作为公司实控人朱红梅、缪汉根通过控制江苏盛虹科技股份有限公司、盛虹石化集团有限公司、盛虹(苏州)集团有限公司、连云港博虹实业有限公司4家公司累计持有东方盛虹69.4%股权,巅峰时该部分股权价值超1860亿元(按复权价格计算)。

此后几年,由于光伏行业产能过剩,EVA材料价格持续下滑,东方盛虹光伏材料产品盈利能力持续走弱,加之投资者风格的转变,东方盛虹股价持续下跌,2024年9月,公司股价最低跌至7元/股左右,较巅峰期下跌超80%。

近期,得益于扣非后净利润大爆发,东方盛虹股价有所上涨,截至9月15日公司股价报收13.75元/股,较2024年9月低点涨接近100%,但仍较2021年股价高点跌超65%。

以实控人缪汉根、朱红梅夫妇控制的股份总数计算,其持股市值较高点蒸发超1200亿元。

在股价持续下跌的背景下,实控人控股的盛虹科技、盛虹石化、盛虹苏州三家企业接连增持公司股份,自2024年起累计增持股份总数超3亿股,增持金额合计约为37亿元。

在地缘政治影响下,布伦特原油仍在维持高位运行,但东方盛虹石化新材料产品毛利率能否维持17%以上,还要看低价原油库存消耗完毕后公司的整体成本控制能力。此外,在行业竞争加剧叠加公司资产负债率接近80%的背景下,公司规模约168亿元的扩产项目能否顺利落地,仍有待时间验证。

注:文/段楠楠,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:创业最前线

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

东方盛虹2026年上半年净利润大幅增长的原因是什么?

2026年上半年受地缘政治冲突影响,布伦特原油均价同比上涨29%,带动苯乙烯、PTA等化工品价格上行;东方盛虹前期囤积低价原油,采用油/煤/气多原料模式控制成本,当期扣非净利润43.16亿元,同比增超14倍,为成立以来最佳半年度业绩。

东方盛虹的核心业务布局覆盖哪些板块?

东方盛虹是国内民营大化工龙头企业,为国内少数覆盖炼化一体化、新能源新材料、聚酯化纤三大业务板块的化工企业,产品涵盖乙烯、PX等石化原料,EVA等新能源新材料,以及聚酯化纤相关产品。

东方盛虹2026年公布的扩产计划总投资额是多少?

2026年4月东方盛虹公布总投资近168亿元的扩产计划,包含两个项目:一是投资34.55亿元建设200万吨/年焦化原料预处理装置及配套设施;二是拟投资133.3亿元建设芳烃产业链提质增效项目,布局TDI、PC聚碳酸酯等高附加值产品。

东方盛虹推进百亿级扩产存在哪些潜在风险?

截至2026年6月末,东方盛虹有息负债超1380亿元,资产负债率超80%,本次扩产多数资金预计需对外筹集,或进一步推高负债率;若后续化工品价格波动加大、低价原油耗尽后高毛利率难维持,扩产或拖累公司业绩。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0