广告
加载中

超级 IPO 今晚诞生 但中国商业航天 未必要复制一个 SpaceX

持续思考的 2026-06-15 14:56
持续思考的 2026/06/15 14:56

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文围绕SpaceX超级IPO事件,拆解了商业航天行业的核心逻辑和未来前景,核心干货整理如下:

1. 商业航天的核心真实需求是获取地面无法拿到的数据、完成数据通讯,低轨轨道资源稀缺,目前近地轨道仅能容纳约10万颗卫星,SpaceX申报了4.2万颗,中国规划总量约4万颗,抢占低轨是核心战略。

2. 火箭研发的核心难点是非标生产、复杂系统集成、缺少高频试错机会三者叠加,反常识的是可回收火箭反而比一次性火箭零件更少、结构更简单。

3. 火箭降本分四个台阶:能发射、一级可回收、回收后可重复利用、批量低成本制造,SpaceX已走完四级,中国目前在二三级之间验证,静态差距约10年,但突破后发展速度会更快,未来五年中国发射总量有望追平SpaceX过去15年的总量。

4. 未来发射成本降到500元/公斤后,普通人花费8万左右就能去太空旅游,成本和当前去南极旅行相当。

本文分析了商业航天赛道的发展趋势和机会,给品牌商的干货参考如下:

1. 消费与产业趋势方面,商业航天已经从讲故事阶段转向实打实的盈利生意,SpaceX此次IPO就是标志性事件,目前星链年入114亿美元,占SpaceX总收入六成以上,全球用户超千万,赛道已经具备商业化基础。

2. 核心竞争力层面,未来获取高空数据、完成数据通讯是各行业的核心门槛,低轨轨道资源是核心战略资源,提前布局占据资源就能建立竞争壁垒。

3. 赛道机会方面,随着发射成本下降,太空旅游会逐步走向大众化,成为新的大众消费赛道;同时中国商业航天走分工协作的差异化路线,不需要复制SpaceX的垂直整合模式,发动机租赁等细分赛道存在大量布局机会,品牌商可以提前卡位。

本文梳理了商业航天赛道的现状、机会与风险,给相关领域卖家的干货整理如下:

1. 增长机会层面,商业航天的刚性需求已经显现,一方面军事领域对战场实时观测、通讯的需求直接拉动了行业发展,星链已经成为美军的核心通信骨干;另一方面民用领域对高空数据的需求也在增长,赛道整体增长确定性高。

2. 商业模式创新机会,未来可回收火箭发动机大概率会复制航空发动机的租赁模式,卖家不需要一次性承担高额的研发采购成本,大大降低了行业准入门槛,给中小参与者留出了空间。

3. 风险与机会提示,当前行业仍处于技术验证阶段,中国和SpaceX有10年左右的静态差距,技术落地仍需要时间,需要警惕落地不及预期的风险;但中国有完整的产业链和制造业规模优势,一旦完成从0到1的突破,发展速度会远超美国,相关配套供应链领域会迎来爆发式增长机会。

本文分析了商业航天产业对生产端的需求和带来的机会,给相关制造工厂的干货参考如下:

1. 产品生产设计需求层面,可回收火箭和传统一次性火箭的设计思路完全不同,一次性火箭追求最高性能不计成本,所以结构复杂零件多;可回收火箭出于经济性要求,需要提高集成度、减少零件数量,走标准化批量生产路线,给生产端提出了新的要求。

2. 商业机会层面,中国商业航天不会复制SpaceX的垂直整合路线,会依托国内制造业规模优势走分工协作路线,发动机、箭体结构等核心零部件都会开放给专业制造企业,会给国内工厂带来大量稳定的订单机会。

3. 产业发展启示,当前行业的核心目标是降本,而降本的核心是标准化和规模化,工厂可以提前布局标准化批量生产能力的建设,抓住行业发展过程中的配套需求,依托国内制造优势分享产业增长的红利,目前国内已经有企业实现单台发动机重复使用20次以上,技术逐步成熟,产业落地速度在加快。

本文梳理了商业航天行业的发展趋势和核心痛点,给相关服务商的干货整理如下:

1. 行业发展趋势层面,SpaceX的超级IPO标志着商业航天已经从概念阶段正式进入商业化运营阶段,整个产业从技术验证转向规模化降本,中国商业航天未来会走分工协作的集群发展路线,会衍生出大量专业化的服务需求,市场空间广阔。

2. 行业核心客户痛点,当前行业的核心痛点是降本难度大,火箭本身兼具非标生产、复杂系统集成、试错机会少三个特征,导致每家企业都要从头研发,重复造轮子,试错成本居高不下,制约了整个行业的商业化发展。

3. 解决方案与市场机会,发动机租赁是解决行业高成本痛点的可行方向,服务商可以切入火箭发动机融资租赁市场,通过批量生产摊薄制造成本,把试错成本分摊到多个客户身上,既可以降低火箭企业的成本,也能开辟新的盈利空间;此外数据运营服务也是未来的核心机会,数据获取和通讯是行业核心门槛,相关服务需求会持续增长。

本文分析了商业航天产业的发展路径,给相关产业平台的干货参考如下:

1. 产业对平台的核心需求,当前商业航天行业普遍存在重复造轮子的问题,因为行业非标、复杂度高、试错成本高,每家企业都要从头研发整套技术,导致全行业成本居高不下,迫切需要平台搭建分工协作的产业生态,整合上下游资源,减少重复投入,降低全行业的整体成本。

2. 平台运营与布局方向,平台可以围绕行业降本的核心需求,搭建核心零部件共享平台、发射试错资源共享平台,解决行业非标生产、试错资源不足的核心痛点,提升整个行业的研发效率。

3. 招商与生态建设方向,平台可以重点引入发动机等核心部件专业供应商、航天配套制造企业、数据运营服务商等细分领域参与者,依托中国完整的产业链和制造业规模优势,打造分工协作的商业航天产业集群,契合国内商业航天的差异化发展路径,可以提前占位优势赛道,获取先发优势。

本文围绕SpaceX上市事件,梳理了全球商业航天产业的发展现状与中国的差异化路径,给研究者提供了新的产业观察,核心内容如下:

1. 产业新动向,SpaceX已经完成商业化验证,不是只讲火星故事的概念公司,2025年预计收入187亿美元,其中星链贡献超六成,此次超级IPO标志着商业航天正式从概念探索阶段转向成熟商业化阶段,需求端受军事数据需求和民用数据需求双重拉动,已经进入快速增长通道。

2. 产业核心新问题,行业的核心难点是非标生产、复杂集成、试错机会少三者的叠加,降本是产业发展的核心命题,火箭降本可以清晰分为四个发展台阶,当前中美处于不同发展阶段,静态差距约10年,但中国具备制造业规模优势和后发优势,完成技术突破后发展速度会远超美国。

3. 商业模式创新方向,提出中国不需要复制SpaceX的垂直整合发展路线,适合依托完整产业链走分工协作的集群发展路线,发动机租赁是符合行业降本需求的新商业模式,未来中国商业航天会走出一条和SpaceX不同的发展路径,这个差异化路径值得深入研究。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article breaks down the core logic and future prospects of the commercial space industry centered on SpaceX's upcoming mega IPO, with key takeaways summarized below:

1. The core real demand of commercial space lies in obtaining data unavailable from Earth and enabling space-based data communication. Low-Earth orbit (LEO) is a scarce resource, with capacity to accommodate only around 100,000 satellites total. SpaceX has filed applications for 42,000 satellites, while China has a planned total of around 40,000. Securing a share of LEO resources is a core strategic priority.

2. The biggest challenge in rocket development is the combination of non-standardized manufacturing, complex system integration, and limited opportunities for high-frequency testing and iteration. Contrary to common intuition, reusable rockets actually have fewer components and a simpler structure than expendable single-use rockets.

3. Rocket cost reduction follows four key milestones: achieving successful launch, recovering the first stage, reusing recovered stages, and mass manufacturing at low cost. SpaceX has completed all four steps. China is currently between the second and third stages of verification, with a 10-year static gap behind the U.S. However, once key technical hurdles are cleared, China's development will accelerate, and its total launch volume over the next five years is expected to match SpaceX's total over the past 15 years.

4. When launch costs drop to $70 per kilogram (≈500 RMB/kg), ordinary people will be able to take a space trip for around $11,000 (≈80,000 RMB), a cost comparable to a modern Antarctic expedition.

This article analyzes development trends and opportunities in the commercial space track, with key takeaways for brands as follows:

1. In terms of consumer and industrial trends, commercial space has moved beyond hype to become a viable, profitable business, with SpaceX's upcoming IPO serving as a landmark milestone. Currently, Starlink generates $11.4 billion in annual revenue, accounting for more than 60% of SpaceX's total revenue, and serves over 1 million global users, proving the commercial viability of the sector.

2. In terms of core competitiveness, access to high-altitude Earth observation data and space-based data communication will become a core threshold for many industries, and LEO orbital resources are core strategic assets. Early布局 to secure these resources allows players to build durable competitive barriers.

3. In terms of track opportunities, as launch costs fall, space tourism will gradually become mass-market accessible, emerging as a new consumer segment. Meanwhile, China's commercial space sector is pursuing a differentiated, division-of-labor development model that does not replicate SpaceX's vertical integration. Large number of opportunities exist in niche segments such as rocket engine leasing, where brands can secure early positions.

This article sorts out the current status, opportunities and risks of the commercial space industry, with key takeaways for sellers in related fields as follows:

1. In terms of growth opportunities, rigid demand for commercial space products has already emerged. On one hand, military demand for real-time battlefield surveillance and communications is directly driving industry growth—Starlink is already a core communications backbone for the U.S. military. On the other hand, civilian demand for high-altitude data is also growing, making the sector's overall growth trajectory highly certain.

2. In terms of business model innovation opportunities, reusable rocket engines will most likely follow the leasing model common in the aviation engine industry. This eliminates the need for sellers to bear the full high cost of R&D and procurement upfront, greatly lowering entry barriers and leaving room for small and mid-sized participants.

3. In terms of risk and opportunity outlook, the industry is still in the technical verification stage, with roughly a 10-year static gap between China's development and SpaceX's. Technical commercialization still requires time, so participants should be wary of the risk of slower-than-expected progress. However, China benefits from a complete industrial chain and large-scale manufacturing advantages. Once it achieves the critical zero-to-one technical breakthrough, its growth rate will far outpace the U.S., bringing explosive growth opportunities to related supporting supply chains.

This article analyzes production-side demand and opportunities brought by the commercial space industry, with key takeaways for relevant manufacturing factories as follows:

1. In terms of product design and manufacturing requirements, reusable rockets follow a completely different design philosophy from traditional expendable rockets. Expendable rockets prioritize maximum performance regardless of cost, resulting in complex structures and large numbers of components. For economic reasons, reusable rockets require higher integration, fewer parts, and standardized mass production, creating new requirements for manufacturers.

2. In terms of business opportunities, China's commercial space industry will not replicate SpaceX's vertical integration model. Instead, it will leverage the country's manufacturing scale advantage with a division-of-labor model, where core components such as engines and rocket body structures will be open to professional manufacturing enterprises, bringing large volumes of stable orders to domestic factories.

3. In terms of industry implications, the core goal of the current industry is cost reduction, which depends fundamentally on standardization and scale. Factories can build up standardized mass production capabilities in advance to capture supporting demand as the industry grows, and share in the sector's growth dividends leveraging China's manufacturing advantages. Currently, domestic firms have already achieved more than 20 reuses of a single engine, demonstrating maturing technology and accelerating industry commercialization.

This article sorts out development trends and core pain points of the commercial space industry, with key takeaways for relevant service providers as follows:

1. In terms of industry development trends, SpaceX's upcoming mega IPO marks that commercial space has officially moved from the conceptual stage to the commercial operation phase, with the entire industry shifting its focus from technical verification to large-scale cost reduction. China's commercial space sector will follow a clustered development path based on division of labor, which will spawn large demand for professional services and create vast market space.

2. In terms of core customer pain points, the biggest challenge facing the industry is high cost reduction difficulty. Rockets inherently combine three characteristics: non-standard production, complex system integration, and limited testing opportunities. This forces every company to conduct R&D from scratch and reinvent the wheel, keeping trial and error costs persistently high and constraining the industry's commercial development.

3. In terms of solutions and market opportunities, engine leasing is a viable solution to the industry's high cost pain point. Service providers can enter the financial leasing market for rocket engines, amortizing manufacturing costs through mass production and spreading trial and error costs across multiple customers. This both reduces costs for rocket companies and opens up new profitable growth space. In addition, data operation services are another core future opportunity, as data access and communication are core industry thresholds, and demand for related services will continue to grow.

This article analyzes the development path of the commercial space industry, with key takeaways for relevant industry platforms as follows:

1. In terms of core industry demand for platforms, the commercial space sector currently suffers from widespread reinvention of the wheel. Due to the industry's non-standard nature, high complexity, and high trial and error costs, every company has to develop a full set of technology from scratch, driving up costs across the entire industry. There is an urgent need for platforms to build a division-of-labor industrial ecosystem, integrate upstream and downstream resources, reduce redundant investment, and lower overall costs for the entire sector.

2. In terms of platform operation and布局 direction, platforms can center their work on the industry's core demand for cost reduction, build shared platforms for core components and shared test/launch infrastructure, solve the core pain points of non-standard production and insufficient testing resources, and improve R&D efficiency for the entire industry.

3. In terms of investment promotion and ecosystem building, platforms can prioritize attracting participants in niche segments such as professional suppliers of core components like engines, aerospace supporting manufacturers, and data operation service providers. Leveraging China's complete industrial chain and large-scale manufacturing advantages, platforms can build a clustered commercial space ecosystem based on division of labor, which aligns with the differentiated development path of China's domestic commercial space sector. Early entry allows platforms to secure advantageous positions and capture first-mover advantages.

Centered on SpaceX's upcoming IPO, this article sorts out the development status of the global commercial space industry and China's differentiated development path, offering new industry insights for researchers with core content as follows:

1. In terms of new industry trends, SpaceX has completed commercial validation and is no longer just a conceptual company centered on the Mars narrative. It is projected to hit $18.7 billion in revenue by 2025, with over 60% contributed by Starlink. Its upcoming mega IPO marks that commercial space has officially moved from the exploratory conceptual stage to the mature commercialization phase. Driven by both military and civilian demand for data services, the industry has entered a period of rapid growth.

2. In terms of new core industry issues, the core difficulty of the sector is the combination of non-standard production, complex system integration, and limited testing opportunities. Cost reduction is the core priority for industry development, and rocket cost reduction clearly follows four distinct development milestones. China and the U.S. are currently at different development stages, with a static gap of around 10 years. However, China benefits from manufacturing scale advantages and late-mover advantages, and will grow much faster than the U.S. once key technical breakthroughs are achieved.

3. In terms of business model innovation directions, this article argues that China does not need to replicate SpaceX's vertically integrated development path. Instead, it is well positioned to pursue a clustered development route based on division of labor leveraging its complete industrial chain, with engine leasing as a new business model well aligned with the industry's cost reduction needs. China's commercial space sector will develop a distinct path different from SpaceX's, and this differentiated route deserves in-depth research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

「宏观漫谈」是「高能量」播客中最受欢迎的系列节目之一。在大家的陪伴下,这个系列已经持续更新超过100期。在过去的时间里,我们常在评论区收到这样的留言:"这期信息密度太大了,有没有文字版可以对照着反复咀嚼?"为了回应这份硬核的学习热情,今年我们把播客中部分高密度的对谈,用"确定的结论 + 简单的底层逻辑解释 + 具体的案例说明"的形式,在「宏观漫谈专栏」持续更新。文字的浓缩难免会舍弃原声里生动的细节,完整内容欢迎移步小宇宙App或 Apple Podcast,搜索「高能量」收听。正如《枪炮、病菌与钢铁》的作者贾雷德·戴蒙德所说:在算法机制下,人们越来越容易只看到自己认同的内容,既有的观点被不断强化,不同的声音则被本能地拒绝。在宏观世界的推演中,没有绝对的正确,因为变化总在发生。我们只是希望分享一种观察视角,欢迎各种不同角度的交流。

(注:本文及本专栏所有内容,仅作为商业逻辑与宏观趋势的交流探讨,均不构成任何投资建议。)

美国时间 6月 12日,SpaceX将在纳斯达克上市了。

据公开报道,这家公司目标募资约750亿、估值冲1.75万亿,是近年罕见的“超级IPO”。有意思的是,正因为有SpaceX这样的超级IPO,全球募资金额的第一名,可能又要回到美国,这一点丰叔在更早一期的宏观漫谈里就提到过。

SpaceX能撑起这样的估值,靠的不只是一个火星故事。据其招股书,SpaceX 2025年收入约187亿美元,同比增长三成;其中星链(Starlink)一项就贡献了约114亿美元、占六成以上的收入,全球用户已超过一千万。换句话说,SpaceX早已不是一个只会讲故事的公司,而是一门实实在在赚钱的生意。

但除去美股市场的热闹,我们更想借着这个由头,往下追问一层:商业航天到底是不是一门好生意?这门生意难在哪、钱从哪来、中国的商业航天公司能不能追上SpaceX的步伐?

这是「宏观漫谈」专栏的第三期内容。 本期关键词:SpaceX上市 | 数据即门槛 | 火箭三难题 | 四步台阶 | 发动机租赁 | 太空旅游可及性……

/01/

商业航天的真实需求在哪里?

如何获得数据和数据通讯,会变成最重要的竞争力和门槛。

1. 商业航天的真实需求,藏在“数据”这两个字里。

很多人看商业航天,第一反应是火箭、是卫星、是马斯克。但更根本的问题是:商业航天的需求到底从哪来,为什么未来会有越来越多的行业用得上它?答案就藏在“数据”这两个字里。如何获取数据、如何完成数据通讯,正在成为各行各业最重要的竞争力和门槛;而商业航天站在高空,恰好能拿到地面拿不到的各类数据。

2. 战场上的实时需求,让商业航天从“迟早”变成“现在就要”。

商业航天在最近一年时间里很热,这在一定程度上是被战场“催”出来的。最典型的,是对战场实时观察的需求:不管是卫星,还是相关的高空军事手段,交战双方都需要捕捉对方兵力集结的方向、火力发射的目标。俄乌战场上那些兵力部署、火力配置的数据,是大家最熟悉的例子。

而更近、也更能说明刚需的,是美以伊冲突。据外媒援引五角大楼文件的报道,星链和军用版的星盾(Starshield)已经成为美军对伊朗无人机打击的通信骨干,商业卫星拍下的图像,甚至成了全球媒体第一时间确认战况的主要来源。

3. 越往低处,轨道资源越稀缺。占住低轨就是国家战略。

为什么大家都在抢低轨?可以打个同心圆的比方:卫星离地球越近,那条轨道的面积和周长就越小,能容纳的卫星自然越少。星链主要就铺在最低的那一轨。但低轨有个麻烦,卫星发上去会有损耗,会越旋越低,用一段时间就会掉下来。可越是这样,先把低轨资源占住就越重要,在中美两国的国家战略层面都越来越重要。

峰瑞被投企业九州云箭创始合伙人刘洋跟我们录过一期播客,根据他当时的说法:近地轨道大约能容纳10万颗卫星,SpaceX申报了约4.2万颗,中国各方面加起来也有约4 万颗的规划。

/02/

这门生意到底难在哪

火箭的难,在于“非标、复杂集成、没法高频试错”三种困难的叠加。

1. 三个约束叠加,构成了商业航天真正的难关。

火箭其实是个很有意思的讨论对象——原则上它并没有那种需要从科学原理上去攻克的难题,但它又如此困难。

原因在于三点。第一,它的部件几乎都不是标准件,每一个都得单独做。第二,它是大规模系统集成,每个零件做出来之后还要连成一个极其复杂的整体。第三,发射窗口和发射资源有限,导致没有太多试错机会。这三件事叠加起来,让调整就变得极难,因为每次调整就要三个一起动。

2. 一个反直觉:一次性的火箭,反而更复杂。

我原本以为,火箭发动机最难的部分,是因为它的零部件基本都是一次性的,没人会为它们做规模化生产。但刘洋告诉我,事实恰恰相反:一次性发动机的零部件反而更复杂,可重复使用的发动机零件数更少。

原因在于,应用场景会反过来决定产品设计。一次性火箭追求的是最高性能、最大运力,成本和周期都不计,自然越做越复杂;可回收发动机出于经济性,必须把集成度提上去、把零件数压下来。这就像从燃油车到新能源车,复杂的动力总成被改变,集成度变高,零件反而变少了。

3. “每家都在重复造轮子”。

正因为非标、复杂、又难试错,每家公司都要把这套东西从头单独做一遍。这其实就是“重复造轮子”,高复杂度、高试错成本,单量又少。这就催生出一个商业航天领域的核心问题:这样一门生意,最终该怎么把成本降下来?

/03/

降本的四步台阶,以及SpaceX凭什么领先?

火箭降本要一级一级爬台阶,SpaceX已经爬到了最后一级。

1. 从能上天,到能“便宜地上天”,中间隔着四级台阶。

火箭降本,可以拆成清晰的四步。

第一步,能发上去,这是最基础的。第二步,一级火箭可回收——掉下来不解体、不损坏。第三步,回收之后可重复利用——这和“能回收”是两回事,落回来了,发动机下次还能不能用是另一码事。第四步,在前三步的基础上,用不锈钢一体成型这类工艺,让火箭的结构更便于低成本、批量制造,从而大幅降成本。

2. 这四级台阶,SpaceX基本走完了,中国商业航天在二三级之间。

马斯克确实是领先的,因为他早早做了十几年。去年12月,中国商业航天接连做了两次一级可回收验证。先是一家民营火箭公司首飞入轨,但一级在回收时没能软着陆;半个多月后,国家队的长征十二号甲也是首飞入轨、一级垂直回收失利。两次都没成功。直到今年2 月,长征十号才完成我国首次火箭一级箭体海上打捞回收。

换句话说,中国商业航天还在第二步到第三步之间反复验证,而马斯克已经把最后一级也走完了。这个差距,有点像2017、2018年特斯拉和国产电车之间的差别,甚至更大一些。

关于SpaceX是怎么起来的,还有一段常被忽略的渊源。太空争霸年代,NASA获得了巨额投入;苏联解体后竞赛停摆,预算被大幅削减,而既有任务仍需执行,于是NASA转而将发射任务外包给民营企业以降低成本。马斯克2002年创立的SpaceX,正是承接这波外包的公司,不过早期发射屡屡失败,直到2008年才真正拿下NASA的订单。

3. 差距是静态的,是有机会追赶的。

九州云箭,正是专做一级火箭发动机、包括可回收发动机的公司,其创始合伙人刘洋给了几个更具体的数字。九州云箭实测单台发动机的重复使用次数已经能到20多次,上限还没摸到。至于中美差距,刘洋算的是另一笔账:中美商业航天的静态差距约10年,但国内一旦完成从0 到1 的突破,从1 到N 的效率、供应链和生产力是强过美国的。他甚至大胆预测,之后五年内中国发射的火箭数量和载荷,很可能追平SpaceX过去15年的总量。

/04/

中国商业航天的发展路径:标准化、规模化,和一门“发动机租赁”生意

绝大部分航空公司买的飞机发动机都是租的,火箭发动机将来也可能是。

1. 中国商业航天的牌在于制造业的规模优势。

和SpaceX的垂直整合不同,中国商业航天的打法,最终要落到制造业的规模优势上:既可重复利用,又能把制造成本压低,还能批量制造。标准是四件事要同时做到——标准化、低成本、规模化、可重复。只有这几件事一起实现,所谓“商业航天的规模化”才算真正成立,可及性才会高起来。

2. 商业航天的未来,可能像航空公司一样,走“发动机租赁”路线。

这里有一个很多人未必在意的事实:几乎所有航空公司的飞机发动机都不是自己买断的,而是按飞行小时向发动机厂商付费、用多少算多少,连公务机大多也是如此。原因是发动机太贵、维护保养又太专业太麻烦,于是劳斯莱斯、通用电气(GE)这些专业供应商把它单独做成一门生意,航空公司按飞行小时付费。火箭发动机面临的是同一类问题——高复杂度、高试错成本、单量又少。

如果未来可回收、可重复利用的火箭发动机也走融资租赁:做火箭的专心做火箭,可回收的发动机则从专业供应商那里租,对火箭公司反而划算得多。供应商一次定制20台摊薄制造成本,再把过往的试错摊到20份合同上,哪怕单次发射只收一两百万,也能赚到钱。

这个行业如果能规模化,最终很可能也会像飞机一样,长出一个“发动机租赁”的位置。

/05/

当成本降到500元一公斤,普通人也能去太空看一眼

到那时候,去太空看一眼的可及性,就接近今天去南极了。

1. 当成本足够低,太空旅行会从“天价”变成“花得起”。

这是一笔假设性的测算。把一公斤载荷(人、货物或资源)送上太空,如果用一次性火箭发射,大约要5 万元(取平均值);假设能做到可回收、复用十次以上,成本或许能降到几千元;假设再加上不锈钢一体成型、规模化制造,成本可能还会再降一个数量级,比如到大概500元一公斤。成本一旦降到这一步,载人上天的账就完全不同了。按5 万元一公斤、一个人七八十公斤算,光发射就要三四百万,太贵;可如果降到500元一公斤,同样一个人只要约4 万元,加上附加费翻一倍,也就8 万元左右。

到那时候,只要这个人身体条件及格,没有心脏病、高血压,高度近视之类的情况,普通人也能花几万块钱去太空看一看,费用差不多相当于今天去一趟南极。

2. 真到了那一天,运营太空旅游的,多半不是火箭公司。

有意思的是,未来这门生意很可能是分工的。最后也许会变成做火箭的专心做火箭,而可回收、可重复利用的发动机部分独立运营、对外出租。那时候很多火箭公司可能已经不是今天的样子,更像一门服务生意,火箭对它们来说只是工具。

结语

SpaceX这次上市像一个信号,它标志着商业航天从“讲故事”,走向了“做生意”。只不过通往成熟商业化的路上,我们走的未必是复制一个SpaceX,而是另一种方式——用最完整的产业链,分工协作,集群推进。

至于哪条路更容易到达一个人人都可太空旅行的未来,时间会给出答案。

注:文/持续思考的,文章来源:峰瑞资本(公众号ID:freesvc),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:峰瑞资本

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0