广告
加载中

618“静悄悄” 蕉内十年线下迷途

冯羽 2026-06-08 09:27
冯羽 2026/06/08 09:27

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章梳理了成立十年的网红内衣品牌蕉内的发展历程与当前面临的发展困境,核心干货如下:

1. 蕉内的发展路径:2016年抓住消费者不满水洗标刺痒的痛点,推出无标签内裤切入市场,抓住天猫流量红利快速增长,2020年GMV突破10亿,2021年投后估值达20亿美元,2024年GMV超60亿元成为国内内衣头部品牌,目前将自身定位为体感科学公司,完成从内衣到防晒、冲锋衣的全品类布局。

2. 当前蕉内面临的多重考验:线上流量被众多新旧品牌瓜分,投放转化率下滑,线下扩张缓慢,百城计划面临复杂的经销利益博弈难题;全品类扩张后品牌定位模糊,原有的无感舒适卖点已经被竞品跟风,不再具有稀缺性,产能过剩背景下的白牌大军还不断冲击品牌溢价;2021年后没有新融资,IPO窗口收窄,后续增长动能不足。

本文以蕉内的发展案例,为新消费服饰品牌梳理了行业现状与经验教训,核心干货如下:

1. 可借鉴的早期成功经验:抓住行业未被关注的用户微小痛点切入,选择品牌集中度低、市场规模大的高频消费赛道,早期集中资源卡位核心电商平台,抓住流量红利就能快速起量,建立差异化品牌心智。

2. 需要警惕的行业新趋势:当前内衣行业高度分散,2022-2024年头部品牌CR10仅约20%,产能过剩叠加消费分级加剧,大量白牌借助电商平台扶持政策快速崛起,不断冲击中高端品牌的溢价空间,整体中高端需求呈现疲软态势。

3. 需要规避的发展陷阱:过度依赖线上渠道会在流量红利消退后陷入增长瓶颈,盲目全品类扩张容易模糊品牌定位,差异化卖点需要持续迭代,避免被竞品跟风后失去稀缺性。

本文梳理了内衣赛道的行业变化与蕉内的发展经验,给内衣及相关服饰卖家提供了多方面参考,核心干货如下:

1. 当前行业风险提示:内衣市场已经从增量市场转入存量博弈,线上流量被新旧品牌多方瓜分,传统货架电商增量有限,内容电商投放转化率持续下滑,获客成本不断攀升;产能过剩催生大量白牌,各大平台出台政策扶持产业带白牌商家,中高端价位带的溢价空间被严重挤压,多数细分赛道都已经是同质化红海竞争。

2. 可学习的早期经验:蕉内靠抓住用户未被满足的微小痛点就撕开了市场缺口,卖家可以从细节体验切入挖掘细分需求,打造差异化产品;早期项目资源有限时,集中资源卡位核心平台的策略,能最大化流量红利的效果。

3. 发展启示:线下扩张要提前平衡品牌掌控力与经销体系的利益,全品类扩张要注意维持清晰的品牌定位,避免稀释原有用户心智。

本文分析了当前服饰行业的竞争格局与需求变化,给服饰生产加工工厂带来多方面启示,核心干货如下:

1. 产品生产设计需求方向:当前消费者越来越重视穿着的舒适体感,对产品细节体验的要求不断提升,蕉内提出的体感科学概念已经成为新的消费需求方向,工厂可以围绕温、湿、触、压、防五大体感维度,开发对应的面料、生产工艺,打造适配市场需求的产品,也可以和品牌合作开发相关新品。

2. 当前可把握的商业机会:产能过剩背景下,大量白牌依托工厂产能崛起,拼多多、抖音、淘宝都出台了扶持产业带商家的政策,白牌凭借极致性价比快速抢占市场,工厂可以依托自身供应链优势,直接对接电商平台打造自有白牌产品,契合当前追求性价比的大众需求,获得新的增长空间。

3. 数字化电商启示:工厂可以借助平台对产业带商家的扶持政策,直接对接C端消费者,减少中间环节,获得更高的利润空间,也能快速响应用户需求变化调整产品。

本文梳理了当前新消费服饰行业的发展趋势与品牌痛点,给服饰行业相关服务商提供了参考,核心干货如下:

1. 当前行业发展趋势:新消费服饰品牌已经从流量驱动的爆发阶段,进入到产品驱动的深耕阶段,越来越多品牌开始回归产品本质,重新聚焦核心竞争力打造;整个行业进入存量竞争,白牌势力崛起,线上流量成本高企,线上原生品牌普遍有线下扩张、品牌心智打造的需求。

2. 品牌客户的核心痛点:线上出身的新消费品牌普遍缺乏线下零售运营能力,开展线下规模化扩张面临经销体系利益博弈的核心难题;多数品牌开展全品类扩张后,容易出现品牌定位模糊、用户心智不牢的问题;中高端定位的品牌普遍面临白牌的性价比冲击,品牌溢价难以维持。

3. 业务发展机会:服务商可以针对新锐品牌的核心痛点,开发线下渠道扩张咨询、经销体系管理、品牌定位梳理、流量投放优化等针对性服务,匹配品牌当下的发展需求,拓展自身业务空间。

本文分析了当前内衣服饰行业各方的发展状态,给电商平台的招商、运营管理提供了参考,核心干货如下:

1. 当前品牌端对平台的核心需求:早期新锐品牌需要平台流量红利支撑快速起量,当前流量红利见顶后,品牌需要平台提供稳定的低成本流量,不少线上原生品牌布局线下,也需要平台对接线下渠道资源,帮助解决线下扩张的各类难题。

2. 平台现有政策的影响:当前各大平台推出扶持产业带白牌、中小商家的政策,虽然能够丰富平台供给,凸显平台的性价比优势,但也会冲击平台内中高端品牌的生存空间,加剧行业恶性价格竞争,平台需要平衡不同层级商家的利益,维护健康生态。

3. 运营风向提示:当前内衣行业高度分散,头部品牌占比极低,有较大的整合空间,平台可以重点扶持产品力强、心智清晰的头部品牌,同时规范白牌市场的恶性竞争,也可以针对线上品牌的线下需求,推出线上线下联动的运营方案,帮助品牌落地全渠道布局。

本文以成立十年的新消费内衣品牌蕉内为典型案例,梳理了新消费品牌从爆发到增长瓶颈的全过程,为产业研究提供了丰富的样本,核心干货如下:

1. 当前内衣产业的新动向:国内内衣赛道已经从增量竞争转为存量博弈,行业整体呈现头部品牌集中度低、白牌大量崛起的格局,流量红利耗尽后,新消费品牌普遍从流量驱动转向产品驱动,重新聚焦产品核心竞争力,线上原生品牌纷纷开始布局线下,探索全渠道增长的新路径,不少品牌也开始将海外市场作为新的增长点。

2. 产业发展面临的新问题:线上原生品牌普遍缺乏线下零售运营能力,规模化扩张线下时难以平衡品牌掌控力与经销体系的利益,盲目全品类扩张容易模糊品牌定位;产能过剩叠加平台政策扶持,白牌对中高端品牌的溢价空间冲击明显,新消费赛道投融资遇冷,品牌上市窗口收窄,普遍面临增长动能不足的问题。

3. 商业模式研究启示:淘系D2C直营模式在流量红利期可以帮助品牌快速起量,但红利消退后,该模式适配全渠道全品类扩张的有效性仍待验证,新消费品牌如何穿越周期,仍有大量问题需要进一步探索。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines the 10-year development journey and current growing challenges of Bananain, a leading Chinese internet-famous intimate apparel brand. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Bananain’s development path: The brand entered the market in 2016 with tag-free underwear, addressing the common consumer complaint about itchy clothing tags. It leveraged Tmall’s traffic boom to grow rapidly, hitting 1 billion yuan in GMV in 2020 and reaching a post-money valuation of $2 billion in 2021. By 2024, its GMV surpassed 6 billion yuan, cementing its position as a top domestic intimate apparel brand. Today, Bananain positions itself as a "body science company" and has expanded its product portfolio from intimate apparel to sun protection apparel and hardshell jackets, building a full-category product line.

2. Multiple current challenges: Online traffic is increasingly fragmented by a flood of new and established brands, pulling down advertising conversion rates. Bananain’s offline expansion has progressed slowly, and its "100 Cities" expansion plan faces complex conflicts of interest within its distribution network. Its full-category expansion has also blurred its brand positioning; its original selling point of "tagless comfort" has been widely copied by competitors and is no longer a unique selling proposition. Against a backdrop of overcapacity, a growing number of generic no-brand products are also eroding its brand premium. Bananain has not raised new funding since 2021, and the IPO window has narrowed, leaving it short of momentum for continued growth.

This article uses Bananain’s development journey as a case study to outline the current industry landscape and key lessons for new consumer apparel brands. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Replicable early success strategies: Enter the market by targeting unaddressed minor user pain points, and choose a large, fragmented high-frequency consumption track. In the early stage, concentrate resources to secure a position on core e-commerce platforms and capitalize on traffic dividends to scale quickly and build differentiated brand mindshare.

2. New industry trends to watch: The intimate apparel industry remains highly fragmented, with the top 10 brands holding a combined market share (CR10) of only around 20% from 2022 to 2024. Overcapacity paired with deepening consumption stratification has allowed a flood of generic no-brand products to grow rapidly with support from e-commerce platform policies, steadily eroding the premium space of mid-to-high-end brands. Overall, demand for mid-to-high-end products has weakened.

3. Growth pitfalls to avoid: Over-reliance on online channels will leave brands stuck in growth stagnation once traffic dividends fade. Blind full-category expansion easily blurs brand positioning, and differentiated selling points require continuous iteration to avoid losing uniqueness after being copied by competitors.

This article outlines industry shifts in the intimate apparel track and Bananain’s growth experience, offering multiple insights for intimate apparel and related apparel sellers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current industry risk warnings: The intimate apparel market has shifted from a growing blue ocean to a red ocean of stock competition. Online traffic is fragmented among new and incumbent brands, traditional shelf e-commerce offers limited incremental growth, content e-commerce ad conversion rates continue to decline, and customer acquisition costs keep rising. Overcapacity has spawned a large number of generic no-brand products, and major platforms have introduced policies to support industrial belt generic sellers, severely squeezing the premium space of mid-to-high-end price points. Most niche tracks are already homogeneous, hyper-competitive red oceans.

2. Early-stage lessons to learn: Bananain carved out a market niche just by addressing an unmet minor user pain point. Sellers can tap into niche demand by focusing on detail experience to build differentiated products. When resources are limited in the early stage, concentrating resources to secure a position on core platforms maximizes the benefit of traffic dividends.

3. Growth takeaways: Sellers should balance brand control and distribution network interests in advance before expanding offline. Full-category expansion requires maintaining a clear brand positioning to avoid diluting existing user mindshare.

This article analyzes the current competitive landscape and demand shifts in the apparel industry, offering multiple insights for apparel manufacturing and processing factories. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Product design and manufacturing direction: Consumers today increasingly value comfort and have rising expectations for product detail experience. Bananain’s "body science" concept has emerged as a new consumer demand trend. Factories can develop corresponding fabrics and production processes around the five core dimensions of body experience: temperature, moisture, touch, pressure and protection, to build products that match market demand, or partner with brands to co-develop new relevant products.

2. Current actionable business opportunities: Against a backdrop of overcapacity, a large number of generic no-brand products have risen to prominence relying on factory production capacity. Pinduoduo, Douyin and Taobao have all introduced policies to support industrial belt merchants, and generic products are capturing market share quickly with extreme cost-performance. Factories can leverage their supply chain advantages to directly partner with e-commerce platforms to build their own generic product lines, aligning with current mass consumer demand for affordable products and unlocking new growth room.

3. Digital e-commerce takeaways: Factories can take advantage of platform support policies for industrial belt merchants to connect directly with end consumers, cut out middlemen to capture higher profit margins, and quickly adjust products in response to changing user demand.

This article outlines current development trends and brand pain points in the new consumer apparel industry, offering reference for relevant apparel industry service providers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current industry development trends: New consumer apparel brands have moved beyond the traffic-driven explosive growth stage and entered a product-driven deep cultivation phase. More and more brands are returning to product fundamentals and refocusing on building core competitiveness. As the industry enters stock competition and generic brands rise, online traffic costs have surged, and born-online brands generally need to expand offline and strengthen brand mindshare.

2. Core pain points of brand clients: Born-online new consumer brands generally lack offline retail operation capabilities, and large-scale offline expansion faces core challenges around interest conflicts in distribution networks. After full-category expansion, most brands struggle with blurred positioning and weak user mindshare. Mid-to-high-end brands generally face competition from low-cost generic products and struggle to maintain their brand premium.

3. Business development opportunities: Service providers can develop targeted solutions to address core pain points of emerging brands, such as offline expansion consulting, distribution network management, brand positioning refinement, and traffic投放 optimization, to align with brands’ current development needs and expand their own business scope.

This article analyzes the current status of different players in the intimate apparel industry, offering reference for e-commerce platforms’ merchant recruitment and operation management. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current core demands from brands to platforms: In their early stage, emerging brands rely on platform traffic dividends to scale quickly. After traffic dividends peak, brands need platforms to provide stable low-cost traffic. Many born-online brands expanding offline also need platforms to connect them with offline channel resources and help solve various challenges in offline expansion.

2. Impact of existing platform policies: While current policies supporting industrial belt generic brands and small and medium-sized merchants enrich platform supply and highlight the platform’s cost-performance advantage, they also erode the living space of mid-to-high-end brands on the platform and intensify vicious price competition. Platforms need to balance the interests of different tiers of merchants to maintain a healthy ecosystem.

3. Operational guidance: The intimate apparel industry is currently highly fragmented, with a very low share held by top brands and large room for consolidation. Platforms can prioritize supporting top brands with strong product capabilities and clear positioning, while regulating vicious competition from generic brands. They can also launch integrated online-offline operation plans to meet the offline expansion needs of born-online brands, helping brands complete their omni-channel layout.

This article uses Bananain, a 10-year-old new consumer intimate apparel brand, as a typical case to outline the full process of new consumer brands from explosive growth to hitting a growth ceiling, providing a rich sample for industry research. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New trends in China’s intimate apparel industry: The domestic intimate apparel track has shifted from incremental growth competition to stock competition. The industry overall features low concentration among top brands and the massive rise of generic no-brand products. After traffic dividends were exhausted, most new consumer brands have shifted from a traffic-driven to a product-driven model and refocused on core product competitiveness. Born-online brands are increasingly expanding offline to explore new omni-channel growth paths, and many brands are also targeting overseas markets as a new growth driver.

2. Emerging challenges for industry development: Born-online brands generally lack offline retail operation capabilities, and struggle to balance brand control and distribution network interests during large-scale offline expansion. Blind full-category expansion easily blurs brand positioning. With overcapacity and platform policy support, generic products have significantly eroded the premium space of mid-to-high-end brands. The new consumer track has seen a sharp downturn in investment and financing, IPO windows have narrowed, and most brands face a shortage of growth momentum.

3. Implications for business model research: The Taobao-based D2C direct sales model helped brands scale quickly during the traffic dividend period, but its effectiveness for supporting omni-channel, full-category expansion after dividends fade remains unproven. Many questions about how new consumer brands can survive through industry cycles still require further exploration.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

今年618步入高潮,却鲜少有蕉内的消息。

两个月前,凭借“体感科学”一词,这家成立十年的内衣品牌又重回大众视野。

时间倒回十年前,当一枚小小的水洗标还在摩擦消费者的皮肤时,蕉内毅然选择了“摘掉它”。

从2016年靠一枚“无感标签”撕开内衣市场的切口,到2020年GMV突破10亿,再到2021年投后估值达20亿美元,蕉内曾是名副其实的“网红内衣品牌”。

然而十年之后,这个曾经的“新消费明星”正面临多重考验:渠道高度依赖线上,线下门店不足百家且高度集中于一二线核心城市,百城计划面前是复杂的经销利益博弈;从内衣延展到家居服、防晒、冲锋衣的全品类扩张,在每个细分赛道都面临着同质化竞争。

而真正让蕉内创始人感到警惕的,并非优衣库这类巨头,而是产能过剩背景下汹涌袭来的白牌大军。

今年4月17日,在十周年发布会上,蕉内再次聚焦于内,将公司定位于一家“体感科学公司”,从科学的体感标准,将核心竞争力集中在舒适感上,对品牌调性和运营逻辑一以贯之。

然而,当传统老牌都开始相继推出无感内衣产品,ubras、内外等更是和蕉内站在同一起跑线上的新消费品牌,让消费者变得舒适这样的“无感标签”不再具有稀缺性。

成立十年、估值超百亿,但蕉内自2021年后再无新融资,IPO窗口也正在收窄,市场在问:蕉内的故事,如何继续讲下去?

01 从“无感标签”,到百亿估值

2016年,国内内衣市场还被都市丽人、爱慕等传统品牌主导,消费者对“缝制水洗标刺痒”的痛点已习以为常,蕉内做了一个看似微小却极具创新的举动——去掉了那条令人不适的水洗标,推出“tagless无标签内裤”。这是蕉内崛起最质朴的起点。

抓住水洗标的行业痛点,选择了一个品牌集中度低但市场庞大的高频消费赛道,蕉内的两位创始人均为设计师出身,产品既简约又有设计感.....正是这样的产品逻辑和运营思路,让蕉内从内衣赛道中快速撕开一道口子。

但真正让蕉内从新消费浪潮中脱颖而出的,是电商平台在特定阶段释放的巨大流量红利。

创始人臧崇羽曾总结道,2016年到2020年间,蕉内并未分散精力抓取微博、小红书、抖音等平台流量,而是将资源高度集中在天猫,“做好天猫几乎等于做好线上”。

这种精准卡位带来了惊人的回报——年增速一度高达300%,短时间内冲至内衣品类TOP1。

2020年,蕉内迎来了一个又一个高光时刻:双十一期间销售额突破4.15亿元,内裤、保暖品类双双蝉联行业第一,同年11月完成数亿元A轮融资,由元生资本独家投资,投后估值达到25亿元,创下了近十年国内内衣品牌估值最高纪录。

次年,蕉内再获老虎环球基金7000万美元战略融资,投后估值攀升至约20亿美元,成为新消费领域最耀眼的明星之一。

伴随品牌崛起,蕉内的产品边界也在迅速扩张。2019年从贴身内衣延伸至居家场景,2020年从“内着”走向“外着”,2021年全面迈入全品类布局,到2023年拓展至防晒、运动、冲锋衣等更复杂的穿着场景。

在这期间,蕉内推出了“重新设计基本款”的品牌口号,向外界宣告自己绝不是一个只卖内衣的品牌。凉皮、热皮、银皮、氧气文胸等一系列产品矩阵逐一亮相,覆盖温、湿、触、压、防五大体感维度。

到2024年,蕉内GMV已超60亿元,远超Ubras同期约35亿元的销售额,成为内衣市场无可争议的头部玩家。

在十周年发布会上,臧崇羽则表示蕉内未来“不做向外炫耀的衣服,只做向内安顿的体感。”在蕉内官网,做“一家体感科学公司”的字眼占据了首页最显眼的位置。

然而,高光之下,暗流早已涌动。

02 线上网红,线下迷路

蕉内早期依赖传统货架电商,是典型的淘系D2C模式,通过差异化爆品,借助流量红利实现爆发式增长,这种直营逻辑取消了经销环节,管理效率极高。

淘系之外,蕉内小红书主打种草,侧重“体感测评+细节特写+日常穿搭”;抖音则主打店铺直播,突出产品功能和科技感;微博负责品牌升维,选定王一博、刘浩存为代言人,发布高级大片和品牌态度内容,拉高调性。

传统电商平台流量已被头部品牌和主播瓜分,增量有限,蕉内只得将目光投向新型内容电商渠道。据飞瓜数据,2025年抖音618期间,蕉内官方旗舰店直播,付费投流为流量来源的大头。

然而此时正值618购物节高峰期,有米云数据显示,近30天内,蕉内官方旗舰店直播引流素材和商品广告素材仅为101和17个,均有所下滑,其投放趋势和达人带货销量也创一个月新低。且直播投放素材多为王一博同款防晒衣,即便有明星光环加持也并未带来较高的转化。

蕉内的崛起高度依赖线上渠道,这一点在红利期是优势,如今却成了绕不开的隐忧。618期间投放收缩,蕉内或许也意识到电商整体的投放转化率正在降低。

更严峻的是,不仅ubras、内外、全棉时代品牌纷纷押注线上,爱慕、汇洁等传统内衣品牌也纷纷补课电商,原本属于新锐品牌的线上流量池正被越来越多的玩家重新瓜分。臧崇羽坦言,“现在成交渠道被极大地分散,你要充分获取用户,恨不得六个渠道”。

而线下,似乎才是解决品牌认知模糊的关键所在。“蕉内和蕉下是一个品牌吗?”一位普通消费者的“灵魂发问”,恰好戳中了蕉内的品牌软肋。

而蕉内的线下之路走得并不顺畅。品牌自2020年底启动“着陆计划”,至今在全国开设的门店不足百家。根据官网信息,蕉内已在全国30个城市开出67家线下体感空间,其中深圳布局9家。

从门店分布来看,蕉内体验店多集中在一二线城市——深圳、北京、武汉、成都、上海这5城占比接近一半,且90%以上门店集中在万象城、大悦城等头部连锁商场,同质化竞争和资金压力较大。

相比之下,传统内衣品牌主打线下经销渠道。截至2025年末,平价内衣品牌都市丽人门店超4000家,中高端内衣品牌爱慕也拥有超1700家品牌门店,渠道网络覆盖全国。

对此,臧崇羽也坦言,“一个电商公司要养成线下零售能力,是需要蜕层皮的,没有那么简单”。

未来,蕉内计划将线下体验空间覆盖中国100个主要城市。但百城计划的落地,面临的是比开网店复杂得多的渠道困局:如何在保证品牌对渠道掌控力的情况下实现规模的快速扩张,终将是悬在头顶的“达摩克利斯之剑”。

而这套复杂的利益博弈,正是电商出身的新锐品牌相较传统品牌的最大短板。

03 “全军出击”,却遭白牌掀桌

与全域渠道布局相对的,则是蕉内引以为傲的全品类扩张。从内衣延伸到家居服、防晒服、冲锋衣、保暖内衣,几乎每一个细分赛道都已是红海。

从消费者角度来看,春夏季节,防晒赛道有蕉下、OhSunny等垂直品牌可选;冬季保暖领域,优衣库、恒源祥等老牌占据深厚心智;冲锋衣品类则有北面、哥伦比亚等户外品牌牢牢把控。

蕉内在每一个细分领域都面临着各种各样的对手,当“重新设计基本款”的故事讲遍后,全品类尚未给蕉内构筑起坚固的品类护城河,反而让品牌定位逐渐变得模糊——消费者很难准确说出,除了内衣外,蕉内究竟“还做得好”什么。

而品类方面的“全军出击”,也让竞争对手变得更加分散。臧崇羽在一次专访中直言不讳:“总体来讲,蕉内最大的对手是白牌,因为产能过剩,再加上整体下行的经济环境,大多数人消费降级,就很容易对我们形成冲击。”

这句话点出了当前内衣行业竞争格局最核心的转变。中国供应链效率极高,工厂端的竞争让生产成本持续下降,大量白牌借助抖音、拼多多等平台快速崛起,以极致性价比攻城略地。

《2026全球女士内衣市场洞察白皮书》数据显示,2022年至2024年,中国女性内衣市场头部品牌CR10仅占约20%,行业高度分散且白牌林立。

“不是大牌买不起,而是白牌更具性价比”正成为越来越普遍的消费心态,爱慕股份在财报中就明确提到,中高端需求疲软是业绩下滑的重要原因之一。

而从抖音“产业带服务商权益”到拼多多“百产计划”扶持产业带商家入店开播,再到“淘宝星产地”聚焦中小商家,电商平台的扶持政策还在持续加码,进一步加速白牌供给的崛起与渗透。

蕉内定位中高端,70元到300元的价格带天然处于白牌火力的覆盖范围之内,在消费分级加剧的背景下,品牌的溢价空间正遭遇严峻挑战。

「创业最前线」查询有米云数据也发现,在抖音近30天的热销榜单上,女睡裙品类Top10中蕉内品牌位列第七,其余均为白牌;而店铺里的C位王一博同款防晒衣属于男外套品类,Top10凉感外套中多为老牌男装品牌、户外品牌及白牌,并未出现蕉内身影。

仅从抖音这一线上渠道可得知,一旦相关类目白牌的性价比优势突出,将对蕉内线上单品销售形成冲击。

在资本层面,蕉内的处境同样微妙。2021年A轮融资后,估值攀升至约20亿美元,但此后四年多,蕉内再未披露任何新的融资消息。与此同时,新消费赛道的投融资热度在2022年后急剧降温,资本对新品牌的耐心或兴趣正在下滑。

内衣行业则从增量市场转入存量博弈阶段,传统内衣品牌普遍承压——2025年国内6家上市内衣企业中,爱慕股份、都市丽人营收和利润双双下滑,家居服饰品牌洪兴股份归母净利润同比下滑73.77%,德国内衣品牌黛安芬也在同年11月宣布退出中国大陆市场。

在这样的行业寒冬中,蕉内虽仍有超60亿的GMV体量,但上市窗口正在收窄。蕉内方面从未公开否认上市计划,但成立十年仍未登陆资本市场的现实,让外界对品牌后续增长动力愈发关注。

面对重重困局,蕉内在十周年之际将品牌叙事重新聚焦到“体感科学”上,试图回归产品本质,建立更深的品牌护城河。

从成立体感科学研究院,到将海外市场作为下一个增长突破口,蕉内正在努力回答一个核心问题:如何在概念红利耗尽之后,真正成为一个穿越周期的品牌。

但问题的另一面也同样尖锐——当白牌用同样的供应链、同样的面料甚至更低的价格提供了“足够好”的替代品时,消费者还愿意为蕉内的品牌溢价买单吗?

当全品类扩张分散了品牌焦点,而线下百城计划又缓步推进时,蕉内的下一个十年从哪里获取增长动能?这些问题,臧崇羽和他的团队显然已有觉察。但觉察与解题之间,还有一条漫长的路要走。

正如他在一次访谈中所说,现在更重要的“并不是看谁爆发力比较强,而是看谁命长”。对蕉内而言,十年故事远未到终章,但接下来每一页的落笔,都将比过去沉重得多。

注:文/冯羽,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:创业最前线

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0