广告
加载中

贾国龙独家回应:西贝为什么将关闭102家店?

高天 2026-01-16 09:33
高天 2026/01/16 09:33

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

西贝大规模关闭门店的关键信息与自救行动。

1. 关店计划:102家门店(占全国340家门店的30%),涉及约4000名员工,覆盖北京、上海等35个城市,其中上海关闭18家;计划在2025年一季度内完成,员工工资正常发放,储值卡可退或转其他门店使用。

2. 闭店原因:亏损是直接原因,预制菜风波引发舆论压力,2026年1月门店生意同比下滑50%,累计亏损超5亿元。

3. 自救措施:发放消费券如“西贝请您吃饭”活动(无门槛100元代金券),菜品平均降价10%-20%;员工每人获500元津贴,后续设立工匠精神等津贴(300-800元/人)。

4. 未来展望:放慢扩张,收缩欲望,聚焦经营现有300多家店;员工安置通过转岗解决,目标活下来重建信心。

西贝品牌策略调整与消费趋势洞察。

1. 品牌营销:预制菜风波后舆论压力大,贾国龙反思忽视顾客声音;通过“西贝请您吃饭”活动发放百万张代金券,降价10%-20%吸引顾客。

2. 品牌定价:价格竞争激烈,推出“满50返50”补贴,平均降幅20%以应对消费压力。

3. 产品研发:风波后尝试门店现做菜品,但市场反馈不佳;未来强调透明化制作如明厨亮灶。

4. 消费趋势:顾客需求变化,需倾听意见;行业应推动预制菜标准化,企业以价格诚意和可视化方式重塑用户信任。

西贝事件应对与经营风险机会分析。

1. 政策解读:闭店属正常经营行为,每年动态调整门店;2025年闭店包括深圳等地,属常规范畴。

2. 事件应对:预制菜风波后,采取自救措施如消费券、降价、员工津贴;亏损风险下,放慢扩张。

3. 风险提示:扩张过快导致亏损超5亿元,生意下滑50%;舆论危机可能引发信任问题。

4. 机会提示:收缩策略聚焦现有店,可学习点如透明化生产;合作方式通过员工转岗实现平稳过渡,扶持政策包括津贴发放。

西贝产品生产调整与商业机会启示。

1. 产品需求:预制菜风波后,尝试门店现做菜品(如第一轮整改),但市场未正向反馈;未来需透明化制作提升品质。

2. 生产设计:转向现场制作,强调明厨亮灶和供应链开放日,以可视化方式满足顾客需求。

3. 商业机会:重建信心过程中,提供高质量现制产品;行业推动预制菜国家标准,启示企业应优化生产流程。

4. 电商启示:尽管未直接提及,但基于数字化趋势,闭店止损可集中资源提升门店运营效率。

餐饮行业痛点与解决方案趋势。

1. 客户痛点:预制菜风波暴露舆论风险,西贝亏损超5亿元,顾客信任危机;需求变化导致生意下滑。

2. 行业趋势:风波推动转型契机,行业应参与预制菜国家标准落地,让标准化保障品质竞争。

3. 解决方案:西贝通过降价、消费券、员工津贴应对;企业建议用透明化制作和价格诚意重塑信心。

4. 新技术启示:可视化方式如明厨亮灶可解决信任问题,服务商可借鉴提供类似解决方案。

运营管理挑战与风险规避启示。

1. 商业需求:门店关闭显示运营压力,西贝需及时止损,集中精力经营剩余店;闭店影响4000员工,转岗解决。

2. 平台管理:西贝收缩扩张策略,规避风险;未来放慢开店,以稳定运营重建市场信心。

3. 招商启示:闭店后可能重新评估门店布局,平台可支持商家优化;风向规避如避免预制菜争议。

4. 合作方式:员工安置通过内部消化,平台可学习管理经验如津贴制度。

产业新动向与政策商业模式分析。

1. 产业动向:预制菜风波引发行业转型,西贝闭店102家;亏损超5亿元,生意下滑50%显示新问题。

2. 新问题:舆论危机、顾客声音忽视,商业模式挑战;企业需通过现制升级、透明化应对。

3. 政策建议:行业应推动预制菜国家标准实施,让标准化保障品质,规范竞争。

4. 商业模式:从快速扩张到收缩聚焦(经营300多家店),启示企业以可视化方式赢得长远发展。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

Key information and self-rescue actions regarding Xibei's large-scale store closures.

1. Store closure plan: 102 stores (30% of its 340 nationwide), affecting approximately 4,000 employees across 35 cities including Beijing and Shanghai (18 stores closed in Shanghai). The plan is to be completed within Q1 2025, with employee wages paid normally and stored-value cards refundable or transferable to other stores.

2. Reasons for closure: Losses are the direct cause, compounded by public pressure from the pre-made meal controversy. Store business in January 2026 fell 50% year-on-year, with cumulative losses exceeding 500 million yuan.

3. Self-rescue measures: Issuing vouchers like the "Xibei Treats You to a Meal" campaign (100-yuan vouchers with no minimum spend), reducing average dish prices by 10%-20%; providing each employee with a 500-yuan subsidy, with subsequent subsidies for craftsmanship spirit (300-800 yuan per person).

4. Future outlook: Slowing expansion, curbing ambition, and focusing on operating the remaining 300+ stores; employee reassignment through internal transfers, with the goal of survival and rebuilding confidence.

Adjustments to Xibei's brand strategy and insights into consumer trends.

1. Brand marketing: Significant public pressure followed the pre-made meal controversy, prompting founder Jia Guolong to reflect on ignoring customer feedback; launched the "Xibei Treats You to a Meal" campaign, distributing millions of vouchers and reducing prices by 10%-20% to attract customers.

2. Brand pricing: Intense price competition led to subsidies like "Spend 50, Get 50 Back," with an average price reduction of 20% to address consumer spending pressure.

3. Product R&D: Attempted freshly prepared dishes in stores post-controversy but received poor market feedback; future emphasis on transparency in preparation, such as open kitchens.

4. Consumer trends: Shifting customer demands necessitate listening to feedback; the industry should promote standardization of pre-made meals, with companies rebuilding trust through price sincerity and visual transparency.

Analysis of Xibei's crisis response and operational risks/opportunities.

1. Policy interpretation: Store closures are normal business adjustments, with annual dynamic store optimization; 2025 closures, including in Shenzhen, fall within standard practice.

2. Crisis response: Post pre-made meal controversy, implemented self-rescue measures like vouchers, price cuts, and employee subsidies; slowed expansion amid losses.

3. Risk alerts: Over-expansion led to losses exceeding 500 million yuan and a 50% business decline; public relations crises may trigger trust issues.

4. Opportunity insights: Contraction strategy focuses on existing stores, with learnable practices like transparent production; cooperation methods include smooth employee transitions via reassignment, supported by subsidy policies.

Adjustments to Xibei's product production and insights for commercial opportunities.

1. Product demand: Post pre-made meal controversy, trialed freshly prepared dishes in stores (e.g., first-round reforms) but received negative market feedback; future need for transparent preparation to enhance quality.

2. Production design: Shift toward onsite preparation, emphasizing open kitchens and supply chain open days to meet customer demands through visibility.

3. Commercial opportunities: Rebuilding confidence requires providing high-quality freshly made products; industry should promote national standards for pre-made meals, suggesting companies optimize production processes.

4. E-commerce insights: While not directly mentioned, digital trends indicate store closures for loss mitigation can concentrate resources to improve in-store operational efficiency.

Pain points in the餐饮 industry and trends in solutions.

1. Client pain points: Pre-made meal controversy exposed public relations risks, with Xibei's losses exceeding 500 million yuan and customer trust crises; changing demands led to business decline.

2. Industry trends: The controversy drives transformation opportunities; the industry should participate in implementing national standards for pre-made meals, using standardization to ensure quality competition.

3. Solutions: Xibei responded with price cuts, vouchers, and employee subsidies; companies are advised to rebuild confidence through transparent preparation and price sincerity.

4. Tech insights: Visual methods like open kitchens can address trust issues, offering借鉴 for service providers to develop similar solutions.

Operational management challenges and risk avoidance insights.

1. Business needs: Store closures indicate operational pressure, requiring Xibei to cut losses promptly and focus on remaining stores; closures affect 4,000 employees, resolved through reassignment.

2. Platform management: Xibei's contraction strategy mitigates risks; future slowdown in new openings aims to stabilize operations and rebuild market confidence.

3. Merchant recruitment insights: Post-closure, store布局 may be reassessed, with platforms supporting merchant optimization; risk avoidance includes steering clear of controversies like pre-made meals.

4. Cooperation methods: Employee安置 through internal absorption; platforms can learn from management experiences like subsidy systems.

Analysis of industry trends and policy/business models.

1. Industry trends: Pre-made meal controversy triggered industry transformation, with Xibei closing 102 stores; losses over 500 million yuan and a 50% business decline reveal new challenges.

2. New issues: Public relations crises, neglect of customer feedback, and business model challenges; companies must respond through upgrades to fresh preparation and transparency.

3. Policy recommendations: The industry should promote the implementation of national standards for pre-made meals, using standardization to ensure quality and regulate competition.

4. Business models: Shift from rapid expansion to focused contraction (operating 300+ stores), illustrating that companies can achieve long-term development through visual transparency.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

1月15日,社交平台流传了一份“西贝内部会议资料及闭店清单”,涉及102家门店、约4000名员工。

联商网第一时间向西贝创始人贾国龙求证,对方称关店消息属实。

01一季度内完成102家闭店计划

从闭店名单上看,北京、广州、上海、深圳、常州、成都、东莞、佛山、贵阳、杭州、合肥、济南、嘉兴、昆明、昆山、溧阳、临沂、南京、南宁、南通、宁波、青岛、厦门、苏州、天津、温州、无锡、武汉、西安、烟台、长沙、郑州、中山、珠海等城市,其中上海闭店数量达18家。

联商网获悉,目前西贝全国门店有340家左右,意味着此次一下子将关闭30%左右的门店。

贾国龙告诉联商网:“此次关闭的102家门店将在今年一季度陆续完成,所有不得不离职的员工工资也会正常发放,所有顾客储值卡随时可用在其他门店使用,也可以选择退卡。”

02西贝自救的125天

“我们不求人,靠自己,西贝一万七千名员工拼了整整125天,尽力了。”贾国龙很坦言,亏损是西贝此次规模化闭店的直接原因。

预制菜风波”后,西贝遭受了巨大的舆论压力。

实际上,去年11月,就有市场消息称,西贝陷入关店潮。西贝随后发布声明回应称,开店、闭店属于餐饮行业正常的经营行为,西贝每年都会基于经营情况对门店数量进行动态调整。今年也是如此,近期包括深圳、汕头、义乌等地门店闭店,均属于正常调整范畴。

2025年12月25日,贾国龙在接受采访时反思称:“我长期忽视了顾客的声音,如果再选择一次,坚决不硬刚,耐心听每一个顾客的意见。”对于后续经营,贾国龙表示,将放慢扩张,收缩欲望,把目前的300多家店经营好。贾国龙透露,2026年1月,门店生意同比下滑50%。据悉,西贝截至目前已亏损超5亿元。

同时,西贝也通过发放大额消费券、菜品普降10%-20%、给员工发放津贴等动作来自救。

2025年9月15日,西贝公布第一轮整改方案,将多款菜式的制作调整为门店现做,但市场并没有给出正向反馈。于是,西贝于2025年9月24日启动名为“西贝请您吃饭”的活动,向到店消费者发放了上百万张无门槛100元代金券;10月,又进一步推出 “满50返50”的补贴,还对部分菜品直接降价,平均降幅约20%。

为稳住员工,贾国龙开“全员大会”加油打气,也直接发钱。2025年9月,西贝为一线员工(店长、厨师长级以下)每人发放500元津贴;自10月起,门店设立工匠精神津贴、服务标兵津贴、食安卫士津贴,每个一线员工累计获得津贴总额为300-800元/人不等。

03西贝希望能重建信心

贾国龙回应联商网的信息中,还有两个关键点:

一个是员工安置问题。贾国龙表示,在一季度完成闭店计划前,员工可转岗,也可有新的选择,期间工资照常发放。“西贝还有200多家家店,2家店“消化”关闭的1家店员工,也够了。”

二是西贝未来问题。贾国龙称:“我们会继续拼,争取活下来。”

在遭受较大经营压力和信任危机之际,西贝希望通过关闭低效门店及时止损,以更充足的精力来经营其他门店,这对西贝重建市场信心极为重要。

西贝“预制菜风波”不该成为行业的“尴尬记忆”,而应成为推动转型的契机,需要企业与消费者、同行的“三向奔赴”。

企业应该通过产品现制升级、透明化制作、价格诚意,像老乡鸡那样清晰标注菜品制作类型,用明厨亮灶、供应链开放日等可视化方式来重塑消费者信心。

行业应积极参与预制菜国家标准的落地实施,让“标准化”成为品质的保障,让每一家企业都能在规范中竞争,在坚守中赢得长远发展。

注:文/高天,文章来源:新零售(公众号ID:ixinlingshou),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:新零售

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0