广告
加载中

这6个人 让省市“一把手们”坐不住了

山核桃 2026-07-09 13:40
山核桃 2026/07/09 13:40

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心梳理了近一年多被省市一把手频繁会见的六位企业家,拆解了各地争抢这些企业家背后的城市产业发展逻辑,干货内容如下:

1. 六位受青睐企业家的共性:均是对应产业链的链主企业,同时具备长期主义的企业家精神,分为三类赛道,分别是新能源、农牧等传统赛道的定海神针,京东、沃尔玛等泛消费赛道的强心针,以及宇树科技这类代表硬科技未来的新贵。

2. 不同区域抢人逻辑各有不同:中部省份依托原有汽车产业基础,想要借助新能源实现产业逆袭;西部省份依托自身资源优势求创新;东北希望借新消费和新科技实现产业破冰;东部发达省份则要卡位产业高地,巩固竞争优势。

3. 当前中国城市产业发展出现三大新变化:招商模式从拼优惠转向拼产业链与场景,产业增长从单极依赖转向多级生态,竞争从零和内卷转向区域协同。

本文透露出当前国内产业发展与消费市场的新趋势,对品牌商的干货总结如下:

1. 消费趋势层面,当前国内品质消费升级趋势明确,高净值人群的高品质消费需求缺口明显,像山姆这类高品质零售品牌能帮地方填补消费升级短板;同时江苏、山东等消费大省社零规模增长快,县域消费还有充足的扩张空间,品牌可针对性布局下沉市场。

2. 产业机会层面,新能源、硬科技、新消费供应链都是各省市重点争抢的赛道,品牌若能成为对应赛道的链主,可获得各地政府的产业支持,更容易落地全产业链布局与高端研发项目,实现快速扩张。

3. 经营启示层面,具备长期主义的发展战略,主动绑定地方产业发展蓝图,更容易获得各方资源支持,比如比亚迪的闪充网络布局,刚好契合城市新基建建设需求,实现了企业与地方的双赢。

本文透露出当前国内不同区域的市场机会与政策风向,给卖家的干货总结如下:

1. 不同区域的增长机会清晰:中部省份需要新能源全产业链升级,对配套制造、研发环节需求旺盛;西部省份有低成本绿电与矿产资源,适合新能源相关产能落地;东北正在打造消费+科技新基建,欢迎零售、科技类卖家布局;东部省份需要品质消费与智能制造升级,对高端品牌、科技型卖家需求强烈。

2. 政策层面的新变化:当前各地招商已经从拼优惠政策转向拼产业链配套与应用场景,能带动产业升级的头部卖家、科技型卖家,能获得各地更优质的发展条件,同时区域协同格局下,卖家跨区域布局供应链与市场的门槛大幅降低。

3. 需求变化层面,当前数智化供应链升级是大趋势,卖家可依托头部零售平台的供应链能力,接入不同区域的消费市场,获得更多增长机会。

本文反映了当前产业升级背景下,工厂的新发展机会与转型方向,干货总结如下:

1. 生产与设计需求层面,当前各省市都在推进新能源、硬科技、消费升级领域的产业升级,对高端制造、技术研发环节的需求大幅提升,传统工厂可以向新能源配套、高端智造方向转型,契合各地产业升级方向,更容易获得发展资源。

2. 商业机会层面,不同区域的资源禀赋差异明显,工厂可结合自身需求选择落地区域:电池、新能源相关工厂可以落地云南、四川,享受低成本绿电与矿产资源优势;汽车配套工厂可以落地中部安徽、湖南等地,依托当地完善的整车产业基础获得更多订单。

3. 转型启示层面,当前产业发展已经从单一龙头依赖转向多级生态发展,工厂需要主动对接链主企业融入产业链生态,同时加快推进数智化转型,契合链主与地方的升级需求,才能获得更稳定长期的发展机会。

本文展现了当前国内城市产业发展的新趋势,以及市场的痛点与需求,给服务商的干货总结如下:

1. 行业发展趋势层面,当前国内进入十五五开局的城市产业重构阶段,产业链招商、场景招商成为主流招商模式,产业增长从单极转向多级生态,区域协同发展成为新的产业格局,服务商可围绕跨区域产业链协同、产业招商配套、企业落地服务打造新的业务。

2. 客户痛点层面,不同区域有不同的产业升级痛点:中部要实现传统汽车产业的新能源逆袭,西部要把资源优势转化为产业优势,东北要跳出老工业基地标签实现产业破冰,东部要巩固产业高地的竞争优势,各地都需要引入链主企业完成产业补课,这给产业服务市场带来大量需求。

3. 新技术机会层面,新能源闪充、动力电池、人形机器人、数智化供应链都是当前各地重点布局的新技术方向,服务商可围绕这些新兴赛道打造配套技术服务、人才服务、供应链服务,抓住市场机会。

本文反映了当前产业发展新形势下,平台的新机会与发展方向,干货总结如下:

1. 市场需求层面,当前各地都在推进消费升级与产业升级,平台作为新型商业基础设施的价值被各地高度认可,像京东的数智化供应链、沃尔玛的山姆会员店,都成为各地拉动消费升级、完善产业配套的核心抓手,平台可抓住各地产业升级需求,下沉不同区域市场拓展布局。

2. 差异化布局方向层面,不同区域的需求各有不同:东北需要打通全国供应链,推动本土好货外销,东部需要高端消费场景满足品质消费升级需求,中西部需要完善新能源产业配套,平台可结合不同区域的需求做差异化布局,获得地方政府的支持。

3. 运营风险规避层面,当前区域协同已经成为发展趋势,平台可打通不同区域的产业链与供应链,实现跨区域联动发展,既符合地方产业发展方向,也能拓展自身业务边界,降低单一区域布局带来的风险。

本文展现了十五五开局之年中国城市产业竞争的全新动向,给产业研究者的干货总结如下:

1. 产业竞争新动向:当前国内省市产业竞争已经从过去拼优惠政策、抢低端产能,转向抢产业链主企业、抢高质量研发项目,竞争焦点集中在新能源、硬科技、品质消费等能带动产业升级的赛道,不同区域结合自身禀赋形成了差异化的竞争路线:中部逆袭、西部创新、东北破冰、东部卡位。

2. 产业发展出现三大标志性变化:招商模式从拼政策优惠转向产业链招商、场景招商;产业增长极从过去的单龙头依赖转向多级生态布局;区域关系从过去的零和内卷转向区域协同联动发展。

3. 研究与政策启示:这些变化勾勒出中国城市产业从粗放发展走向精细化发展的转型方向,研究者可围绕区域产业重构、链主企业对产业发展的拉动作用、长期主义企业家精神的价值等方向展开研究,也为地方产业政策制定提供启示,地方需要精准定位自身优势,嵌入企业长期发展战略,形成互补协同的产业格局。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article profiles six entrepreneurs who have met frequently with provincial and municipal top leaders over the past year, and breaks down the industrial development logic behind cities' scramble to attract these business leaders. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Common traits of the six favored entrepreneurs: All lead "chain master" companies in their respective industrial chains and uphold long-term entrepreneurship. They fall into three track categories: anchors of established sectors including new energy and agriculture & livestock; catalysts for broad consumption sectors like JD.com and Walmart; and rising stars representing the future of hard technology such as Unitree Robotics.

2. Different regions have distinct attraction strategies: Central provinces, leveraging their existing automotive industry foundations, aim to achieve industrial upgrading and overtaking via new energy; Western provinces pursue innovation based on their natural resource endowments; Northeast China seeks to revitalize its industrial base through new consumption and new technology; Eastern developed provinces aim to secure leading positions in high-value industrial segments and consolidate their competitive advantages.

3. Three new shifts in China's urban industrial development: Investment promotion has shifted from competing on preferential policies to competing on industrial chain support and application scenarios; industrial growth has shifted from single-pole dependence to multi-pole ecosystem development; competition has shifted from zero-sum involution to regional coordination.

This article reveals new trends in China's current industrial development and consumer market, with key takeaways for brand owners as follows:

1. On consumption trends: The trend of domestic consumption upgrading toward higher quality is clear, with an unmet demand for high-quality products and services among high-net-worth groups. High-quality retail brands like Sam's Club help local governments fill gaps in consumption upgrading. Meanwhile, total retail sales of consumer goods are growing rapidly in large consumption provinces such as Jiangsu and Shandong, and county-level consumer markets still have ample room for expansion. Brands can make targeted layout in lower-tier markets.

2. On industrial opportunities: New energy, hard technology, and new consumption supply chains are all high-priority tracks that provincial and municipal governments are competing to attract. If a brand can become a chain master in its track, it will gain industrial support from local governments, making it easier to implement whole-industrial-chain layout and high-end R&D projects, and achieve rapid expansion.

3. On operational insights: Brands with long-term development strategies that actively align with local industrial blueprints are more likely to gain support from all stakeholders. For example, BYD's layout of fast-charging networks aligns perfectly with cities' demand for new infrastructure construction, creating a win-win outcome for both the company and local governments.

This article reveals market opportunities and policy trends across different regions in China, with key takeaways for sellers as follows:

1. Clear growth opportunities by region: Central provinces need upgrading of the whole new energy industrial chain, with strong demand for supporting manufacturing and R&D links; Western provinces offer low-cost green power and mineral resources, making them suitable for new energy production capacity; Northeast China is building new infrastructure for consumption and technology, and welcomes retail and technology sellers to set up operations; Eastern provinces need upgrading of quality consumption and intelligent manufacturing, with strong demand for high-end brands and technology-focused sellers.

2. New policy shifts: Local investment promotion has shifted from competing on preferential policies to competing on industrial chain supporting facilities and application scenarios. Leading sellers and technology-focused sellers that can drive industrial upgrading will gain better development conditions from local governments. Meanwhile, under the regional coordination framework, the threshold for sellers to lay out supply chains and markets across regions has been greatly reduced.

3. On changing demand: Digital intelligent supply chain upgrading is now a major trend. Sellers can leverage the supply chain capabilities of leading retail platforms to access consumer markets in different regions and unlock more growth opportunities.

Against the background of ongoing industrial upgrading, this article outlines new development opportunities and transformation directions for factories, with key takeaways as follows:

1. On production and design demand: Provincial and municipal governments across China are advancing industrial upgrading in new energy, hard technology, and consumption upgrading, which has significantly increased demand for high-end manufacturing and technology R&D. Traditional factories can transform into new energy supporting facilities and high-end intelligent manufacturing to align with local industrial upgrading directions, making it easier to access development resources.

2. On business opportunities: Different regions have distinct resource endowments, and factories can choose their locations based on their own needs: Battery and new energy-related factories can locate in Yunnan and Sichuan to benefit from low-cost green power and mineral resources; automotive supporting factories can locate in Anhui, Hunan and other central provinces, and gain more orders by leveraging the local complete complete vehicle industrial base.

3. On transformation insights: Industrial development has shifted from dependence on a single leading enterprise to multi-level ecosystem development. Factories need to proactively connect with chain master enterprises to integrate into the industrial ecosystem, and accelerate digital intelligent transformation to meet the upgrading needs of chain leaders and local governments, so as to secure more stable and long-term development opportunities.

This article presents new trends in China's urban industrial development, as well as existing market pain points and demands, with key takeaways for service providers as follows:

1. On industry development trends: China has entered a stage of urban industrial restructuring at the start of the 15th Five-Year Plan period, where industrial chain and scenario-based investment promotion have become the mainstream models. Industrial growth has shifted from a single-pole to a multi-pole ecosystem, and coordinated regional development has become the new industrial landscape. Service providers can build new business lines around cross-regional industrial chain coordination, industrial investment promotion supporting services, and enterprise on-site landing services.

2. On client pain points: Different regions face distinct industrial upgrading pain points: Central provinces aim to transform traditional automotive industries via new energy to overtake competitors; Western provinces seek to convert resource advantages into industrial advantages; Northeast China aims to shed its old industrial base label and revitalize its industry; Eastern provinces aim to consolidate their competitive advantages in high-value industrial segments. All regions need to attract chain master enterprises to fill industrial gaps, creating massive demand for industrial services.

3. On new technology opportunities: New energy fast charging, power batteries, humanoid robots, and digital intelligent supply chains are all high-priority new technology areas for local layout. Service providers can build supporting technology services, talent services, and supply chain services around these emerging tracks to capture market opportunities.

Against the new background of industrial development, this article outlines new opportunities and development directions for marketplace platforms, with key takeaways as follows:

1. On market demand: Local governments across China are advancing consumption and industrial upgrading, and the value of platforms as new commercial infrastructure is widely recognized. For example, JD.com's digital intelligent supply chain and Walmart's Sam's Club have become core tools for local governments to drive consumption upgrading and improve industrial supporting facilities. Platforms can capitalize on local industrial upgrading demand to expand layout in different regional markets.

2. On differentiated layout directions: Different regions have distinct demands: Northeast China needs to connect to national supply chains to facilitate the export of local high-quality goods; Eastern provinces need high-end consumption scenarios to meet the demand for quality consumption upgrading; Central and western provinces need to improve supporting facilities for the new energy industry. Platforms can make differentiated layout based on regional demands to gain support from local governments.

3. On operational risk mitigation: Regional coordination has become a core development trend. Platforms can connect industrial chains and supply chains across different regions to realize cross-regional linked development, which not only aligns with local industrial development directions, but also expands business boundaries and reduces risks brought by layout concentrated in a single region.

This article presents new dynamics of China's urban industrial competition in the opening year of the 15th Five-Year Plan period, with key takeaways for industrial researchers as follows:

1. New dynamics of industrial competition: Domestic provincial and municipal industrial competition has shifted from competing on preferential policies and scrambling for low-end production capacity to competing for chain master enterprises and high-quality R&D projects. The competition focus is on tracks that can drive industrial upgrading, including new energy, hard technology, and quality consumption. Different regions have formed differentiated competition strategies based on their own endowments: Central China pursues overtaking, Western China pursues innovation, Northeast China pursues revitalization, and Eastern China pursues leading positioning.

2. Three landmark shifts in industrial development: Investment promotion has shifted from competing on policy preferences to industrial chain and scenario-based promotion; industrial growth poles have shifted from dependence on a single leading enterprise to multi-level ecosystem layout; regional relations have shifted from zero-sum involution to coordinated regional development.

3. Research and policy implications: These changes outline the transformation direction of China's urban industries from extensive development to refined development. Researchers can conduct research around topics such as regional industrial restructuring, the role of chain master enterprises in driving industrial development, and the value of long-term entrepreneurship. These shifts also offer implications for local industrial policy making: local governments need to accurately identify their own advantages, embed themselves into enterprises' long-term development strategies, and form a complementary and coordinated industrial landscape.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

比亚迪董事长兼总裁王传福最近的行程,堪比“旋风”。

7月的第一天,他和四川省委副书记、省长施小琳见了个面,还化身金牌销售,亲自给成都车主交车;

几天前,在陕西省委书记赵一德、省长赵刚的座谈会里,也出现了他的身影,聊的是比亚迪闪充技术的落地。

有媒体统计,自3月来,王传福拜访了六省主要领导,一时间“争夺王传福”成了城市竞争的新话题。

事实上,省市一把手们争夺的可不只是王传福。

我们整理了从去年年底至今的,大半年来被一把手们频繁会见的6位企业家,有了两个有趣的发现——

并不是谁火,就在争夺谁。

6位企业家中,除了机器人新贵王兴兴外,一把手们频繁会见的还是“老登们”,比如王传福、刘强东、曾毓群。

一把手会客厅的企业家也不单一,而是多元化。

除了中国企业外,还有一批外资企业,泰国正大集团资深董事长谢国民、沃尔玛中国CEO朱晓静。

人是“面子”,龙头拉动产业升级才是“里子”。

一把手们不仅需要这些链主龙头,更希望这些“座上宾们”帮助城市产业补课或升级,这是一场城市产业发展阳谋。

风头正盛的企业家不少,但能在短短半年里成为省市主政者会客厅里频繁出现的熟脸,是少中又少。

成为“熟脸”的必备要素,除了是龙头,还需要是“链主”,肩负拉动产业升级的重任;

除了是“链主”,还需要情怀,也就是长期主义的企业家精神。

这也是这6个企业家身上的共同点。

首先,他们代表的是三类赛道、三类链主。

第一类是传统赛道里的定海神针。

比亚迪、宁德时代都是新能源产业的链主,他们战略、技术和生态的一举一动都影响产业发展的未来。

正大集团则是农牧行业链主,作为改革开放后第一家在华投资的外资企业,正大集团去年全球销售额达1114亿美元,中国地区贡献了近三成的营收。

第二类是,泛消费赛道里的强心针,京东和沃尔玛中国。

被称为“山姆女王”的沃尔玛中国CEO朱晓静足迹遍及江苏、广东、辽宁、山东,京东创始人刘强东的身影也出现在黑龙江、辽宁、福建、江苏等省份。

为何京东和沃尔玛中国如此受消费大省们的欢迎?原因也很简单。

这两家企业不是简单的零售企业,而是承载消费升级、供应链创新和数智化转型的新型商业基础设施。

开一家就火一家的中产标配山姆、快速拓展的京东MALL,不仅是城市商业地标,更是城市消费活力的象征。

第三类,就是代表具身硬科技未来船票的,宇树科技创始人王兴兴。

去年10月回老家浙江宁波,落地智能应急机器人产业园;两个月后现身黑龙江,聊具身东北布局;今年3月,王兴兴与重庆市委书记会面、5月出现在雄安座谈,频繁和多地一把手对接的“人形机器人第一股”可以说是多点开花。

多地疯抢之中,这些企业不只是链主,他们的一把手大多都具备企业家精神。

关于企业家精神的特质,商业院和管理学者们有两个共识:

具备企业家精神的人,第一都十分长情,知道自己从哪里来;第二是有动力性,知道自己长期往哪里去。

有的十分长情。

从安徽无为县走出来的王传福,今年4月和安徽主政者见面时,有一个关键节点——2025年,安徽新能源汽车产量达到了179.41万辆,首次登顶全国,这一成绩背后,和比亚迪持续重仓安徽脱不开关系。

出生在宁波余姚的王兴兴也不忘故乡。

2025年底,王兴兴在宁波落地了总投资超12亿元的智能应急机器人产业园,今年6月还与浙大宁波理工学院签约共建了“浙大宁波理工学院宇树机器人产业学院”,从产业落地走向人才输送。

有的很早就定下了“利国利民”的目标。

谢国民曾说:“正大集团是一条龙,龙的头在中国。”

从拿下深圳“0001号”外商营业执照再到中国三分之一的营收,正大在中国设立企业近七百家、拥有员工超8万人,在中国构建了一条从农场到餐桌的全产业链。

快九十岁的谢国民至今还活跃在一线,不仅战略入股牧原,还带队前往胖东来学习,和于东来惺惺相惜。

三类赛道、三类链主,长期主义的企业家精神,这是6位企业家收获青睐的底层原因。

如此高规格的会见,不止是请企业家来这里发展这么简单。

主政者们显然有更大的野心,期待这群“座上宾”为产业补课,甚至是堵上未来十年的产业发展。

哪些省市在抢?它们的阳谋是什么?

不服输的中部

竞争最激烈的,无疑是不服输的中部。

理解这一点,从安徽、湖南、河南争夺王传福就能看出。

从吃到红利的“传统汽车之都”到“新能源逆袭者”,它们既想要守住自己的汽车产业底色,又想借助新能源完成升级逆袭。

安徽、湖南、河南等中部省份对比亚迪的依存度本来就高,它们不仅希望比亚迪继续在这里继续卷产能,更期待比亚迪在这里优化全产业链布局,引入高端制造与研发环节,向产业链上游走。

这也是为什么在会面中各地都不约而同地提到了比亚迪的闪充技术。

往近处看,闪充技术背后是比亚迪第二代刀片电池和闪充车型的新订单和新产能,这有利于各地新能源产业产线更新、产值提升,同时比亚迪的“闪充中国”战略宣布在城市兴建闪充站,对城市来说,这是新基建。

往远处看,随着比亚迪电池技术突破与充电网络的持续完善,各大城市争夺的其实是比亚迪新能源动力枢纽这一新生态位。

求创新的西部

中部省份不服输,另一边的西部各省则在努力求创新。

众所周知,因资源禀赋、产业起点不同,西部地区的产业发展有个特色:

因地制宜、各美其美。

陕西、四川、云南虽都是资源富集型省份,但路径也有分化。

作为煤炭大省,陕西近年来深化能源化工产业和先进制造业布局,强化西安的科教优势、榆林的能源转型。

这也是为什么西安争夺比亚迪进一步落地的关键原因,发言中特别提到希望比亚迪“在整车生产、高端制造、技术研发等方面加大布局力度。”

四川和云南则是充分发挥资源优势,绑定链主,将成本优势转化为创新动能。

两个省份有个共同点:绿电成本低。

四川锂矿资源丰富,总量居亚洲第一,掌控了全球11%的锂资源,四川宜宾被称为“动力电池之都”,资源优势本身就可以为比亚迪闪充、储能等技术的大规模落地提供更有性价比的能源支撑。

云南也是能源资源大省,绿色电力装机占比超九成,省会昆明正在着力打造新能源电池产业集群。

今年1月,曾毓群就和云南省政府签订全面战略合作,他表示,和云南深化新能源电池、“零碳”园区、交通等领域合作,把云南矿产等资源转化为高价值产品。

和直接打出资源牌的同行不同,虽缺乏大宗矿产资源,但重庆的家底是隐藏的工业强市资源和开放包容的城市基因——

制造能力、场景优势下,重庆也一举获得了曾毓群、王兴兴两个企业家的重仓。

今年1月,重庆领导会见曾毓群时,是这么定位重庆的:

“重庆是一座超大规模城市,国家重大战略交汇叠加,区位优势突出,工业基础坚实,科教资源丰富,生态环境良好,未来发展空间广阔。”

两个月后,会见王兴兴是这么说的:

“重庆是一座开放的城市,是长江上游最大临江城市,拥有国家战略叠加、城市规模、产业基础、交通枢纽、人文生态等比较优势、后发优势,发展空间广阔。”

可以看出来,重庆拼的不仅是资源,还是系统性优势。

想破冰的东北双雄

这群争抢企业家的区域里,“东北双雄”——黑龙江和辽宁显得尤为突出。

从新贵王兴兴,到刘强东、朱晓静,显然,想破冰的东北双雄,渴望跳出“老工业基地”的角色,构建“消费+科技新基建”。

两条腿走路的赛道卡位路线也很清晰——

一条腿是“促消费”。

“东北超”的火热只是一角。辽宁省省委书记许昆林会见“山姆女王”朱晓静,不仅是希望在辽宁多开店,更重要的是拉通供需、打通供应链,将辽品好货都纳入沃尔玛的采购体系。

刘强东的“东北之行”也覆盖黑龙江和辽宁。他给出在辽宁发展的KPI:力争三年内在辽经营规模翻番,从目前的500亿元提高到1000亿元。

这意味着,京东自身的数智化供应链基因、智慧物流、即时零售等能力,都将反哺东北,构建一个新型的科技消费基建。

另一条腿是“抢新赛道”。

宇树的机器人不仅穿着东北大花袄上春晚,王兴兴已经瞄准了黑龙江的“算力协同+AI”,这也正是东北落地前沿科技的优势:工业场景多、土地资源多。

不差钱的东部

和中部、西部不同,不差钱的东部发达省份和地区,抢企业家的产业逻辑完全不同。

先天具备产业基础、资源集聚优势的它们,不需要补课,而是需要进一步精准卡位产业优势。

跟企业争夺“xx第一股”一样,东部地区争的是产业高地的“第一心智”。

拿江苏和山东作为传统制造业大省和消费大省,不约而同瞄准了两个机会:一是品质消费升级,二是智能制造升级。

品质消费升级的机会就藏在沃尔玛中国对两大省份的关注上。

沃尔玛中国CEO朱晓静是苏州人,今年开年她就用两个月拜访了江苏三座城的三位“一把手”;山姆在中国市场三十年来则在山东首次 “双店同开”。

沃尔玛如此看重这两大省份,背后有一条暗线:江苏和山东的消费实力。

2025年,江苏社会消费品零售总额达46394.2亿元超越广东,跻身全国第一;山东则赢在增速,社零总额增速5.1%,居所有经济大省之首。

再看今年第一季度,江苏、山东社零规模都已超过万亿元。我们在《“山姆女王”为何密集拜访江苏三个最强地级市委书记?》中曾做过详细分析,江苏的消费体量和活力有助于山姆未来的县域扩张。

而山东则瞄准北方消费高地的目标,重点聚焦服务消费升级,和江苏相比,缺乏高净值人群消费支出,而这一点,山姆正好能帮它补课。

除了品质消费,两大省份都在卡位新兴产业布局。

山东主政者们密集会见王传福和曾毓群只是A面,硬币的B面是山东正在举全省之力布局新能源全产业链。

而刘强东拜访苏州一行中,苏州市委书记在讲话中提到了一个关键点:

苏州正在加快建设“人工智能+”城市和具有国际竞争力的“智能制造之城”,与京东集团发展方向深度契合,双方合作空间广阔。

由此可见,四大区域看似抢的是同一批人,但却有着差异化的发展路线图,这些聪明的城市能够抢来人,靠的不是运气,而是数年如一日的发展底气。

6个最火的企业家、四大区域的争夺,都是明牌,我们也清晰看到,它们发展手中的牌也变了。

第一,招商的模式变了。

以前见面会谈,领导爱谈政策红利和发展机遇,企业也关注我来这里有没有优惠,但现在讲的是区域定位和发展能级,企业关注的是我来这里的稀缺性。

拿争夺比亚迪来说,省市一把手们除了谈扩产,都在讲闪充技术和全产业链,这意味着,区域对比亚迪的竞争已经从“抢产能”走向“抢质量”,对应的招商模式也讲究产业链招商和场景招商。

第二,产业增长极变了。

我们能看到的一个趋势是,尽管当前促消费和制造升级,依旧是城市发展的主线,但更多区域已从过去的“单极依赖”转向“多级生态”,从招引的企业来看,科技新贵、龙头外资、传统链主一个都不能少。

这说明,越来越多的省份和城市都在做两件事:

一是用新生产要素把自己擅长的事情做极致,比如制造大省和消费大省们的升级;

二是,卡位新兴赛道,赌一个未来,如争夺王兴兴。

第三,协同模式变了。

各省市看似在抢同一个产业、同一批企业,是零和博弈,但实际上,“区域协同、圈层联动”的格局已经非常清晰。

在重庆的王兴兴和在成都的王传福,提到创新资源的协同离不开“成渝地区双城经济圈”;在辽宁和江苏两头跑的朱晓静,不仅会看到苏超和东北超的联动,还有直接感受到两地重点产业链的共建。

从招商模式、产业增长到协同模式的变化也勾勒出“十五五”开局之年中国城市产业重构的新面貌:

走过了“唯数字论”的粗放招商,走过了“一个龙头打天下”的单一依赖,走过了“各自为战”的内卷,未来的区域产业竞争,即便争的是同一批人,但也比谁更精准、比谁更多元、比谁更协同。

谁能把企业的战略节点嵌入自己的长期发展蓝图,谁能和周边城市形成互补而非替代的关系,谁就能在这场重构中留在牌桌上。

注:文/山核桃,文章来源:财经无忌(公众号ID:caijwj),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:财经无忌

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

为什么近期各地主政者都在争相会见知名企业家?

各地主政者会见的企业家多为具备长期主义精神的产业链链主,既能够拉动地方现有产业升级、补足产业短板,也能帮助地方卡位新能源、具身智能、消费升级等新兴赛道,抢占未来产业发展主动权。

能获得各地主政者青睐的企业家需要符合哪些标准?

首先其所在企业需为产业链链主,具备拉动区域产业升级的能力;其次企业家本人要具备长期主义精神,既有对自身发展根基的长情,也有清晰的长期发展目标,可与地方长期发展战略相契合。

当前国内各区域招商引资模式出现了哪些新变化?

当前国内招商已从过去的政策红利导向升级为产业链招商、场景招商,区域间的产业竞争从过去抢产能转向抢高质量产业环节,地方更注重将企业战略节点嵌入自身长期发展蓝图,探索区域协同联动的发展模式。

不同区域争抢链主企业家的核心诉求有什么差异?

中部省份希望依托链主完成传统产业升级逆袭;西部省份因地制宜将资源优势转化为创新动能;东北希望破冰构建消费+科技新基建;东部发达地区则瞄准卡位产业高地,巩固现有产业优势。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0