广告
加载中

集成灶四小龙集体“大逃亡”:卖壳、豪赌与保壳

曹晟源 2026-07-13 06:48
曹晟源 2026/07/13 06:48

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心披露了A股集成灶行业四家头部企业“四小龙”在行业寒冬中的不同生存选择,整理了全行业和头部企业的核心现状干货如下:

1. 行业整体情况:集成灶属于高度绑定新房交付的地产后周期品类,受近年新房交付量大幅下滑影响,2025年全行业零售额同比大降43.1%,线上线下量价齐跌,行业从成长期进入深度调整的低谷期。

2. 四家头部企业的现状与选择:曾经的行业龙头浙江美大业绩缩水近八成,选择卖壳引入跨境电商资本离场;火星人营收缩水后选择收缩产能,布局科技赛道财务投资对冲风险;亿田智能主业亏损后押注算力第二曲线,目前仍处于投入亏损阶段;*ST帅丰面临退市风险,计划收购电力资产保壳。

3. 行业未来:目前四家企业的转型都还没有结果,行业要走出低谷还要等待存量换新周期的到来。

本文为集成灶及厨电相关品牌商提供了行业趋势、战略选择参考等干货信息,具体如下:

1. 行业与消费趋势:当前集成灶行业受地产下行影响,需求底盘被撼动,面临渗透率偏低、换新周期未到、价格战内卷的三重挤压,全行业陷入量价双杀,原有渠道壁垒和品牌先发优势在需求消失面前难以发挥作用,行业已经进入深度调整期。

2. 不同处境品牌的应对路径参考:头部品牌主业严重缩水后,可以选择引入跨界资本卖壳套现离场;资金充裕的品牌可以选择收缩产能,通过布局科技赛道财务投资对冲行业周期风险;主业失去造血能力的品牌可以押注新兴赛道开辟第二增长曲线;面临退市风险的上市品牌可以通过并购成熟实体资产快速调整报表实现保壳。

3. 风险提示:品牌商高度依赖单一地产周期红利的增长模式已经不可持续,需要提前布局对冲周期风险,提前挖掘存量换新需求。

本文为厨电及集成灶相关卖家提供了行业现状、风险提示和机会参考,核心干货如下:

1. 行业现状与风险提示:集成灶属于强地产后周期品类,近年新房开发投资和销售面积大幅下滑,直接带累集成灶需求,2025年集成灶零售额同比下滑43.1%,线下经销商动销疲软,线上价格战持续内卷,全行业量价双杀,现阶段经营集成灶主业面临极高的业绩压力。

2. 可参考的应对策略:不同处境的卖家可以匹配不同策略,头部大卖家可以根据自身情况选择转让控股权套现,或者收缩产能控制成本,通过财务投资分散周期风险;中小卖家如果主业增长乏力,可以尝试挖掘新赛道寻找第二增长曲线,遭遇生存危机的卖家可以通过并购优质资产盘活主体。

3. 未来机会:当前行业处于深度调整期,低谷过后会迎来存量厨房换新的需求窗口,长期来看依然有增长空间,跨界资本进入也会给行业带来新的变化。

本文为集成灶及厨电相关生产工厂提供了需求变化、转型方向等干货参考,具体内容如下:

1. 生产端需求现状:当前集成灶行业需求大幅萎缩,全行业零售额同比下滑超过四成,原有扩产计划已经不符合当前市场需求,头部品牌火星人已经叫停了原计划耗资5.59亿元的智能厨电扩产项目,生产工厂现阶段需要优先收缩产能,控制成本,避免盲目扩张。

2. 转型方向参考:如果主业造血能力不足,工厂可以根据自身资金和资源情况选择转型路径,资金充裕的工厂可以选择轻资产模式,布局科技领域财务投资分散周期风险;也可以选择重资产模式,切入算力等国家支持的新兴赛道寻找第二增长;遇到生存危机的上市主体工厂,可以通过并购成熟实体资产保住上市主体资格。

3. 转型启示:生产工厂不能过度依赖新房地产的增量需求,需要提前布局存量换新市场,开发适配换新需求的产品,对冲单一赛道的周期风险。

本文为集成灶产业链相关服务商提供了行业趋势、客户痛点和业务机会参考,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:集成灶行业已经结束了地产红利带来的成长期,进入深度调整和价值重塑阶段,原有头部品牌集体陷入业绩困境,纷纷开启转型,产业链服务商需要跟随行业变化调整业务方向。

2. 客户核心痛点:当前集成灶品牌商的核心痛点是主业营收缩水、利润大幅下滑甚至亏损,部分上市品牌面临退市风险,核心原因是新房需求萎缩带动行业需求崩塌,行业价格战进一步挤压利润空间,品牌商普遍有转型和脱困的需求。

3. 业务机会参考:服务商可以围绕品牌商转型脱困的需求开发新业务,比如为企业跨界投资提供财务顾问服务,为企业布局新赛道提供运营支持服务,为退市风险企业提供并购重组服务,同时也可以提前布局存量厨房换新的后市场服务,挖掘长期需求。

本文为家居家电电商平台、上市平台等平台类企业提供了行业动态、风险规避等参考干货,具体如下:

1. 招商运营调整参考:集成灶品类受地产下行影响已经整体陷入量价双杀,头部品牌业绩缩水幅度普遍超过七成,平台招商需要调整对集成灶品类的评估逻辑,适当降低对单一绑定地产的集成灶品类的资源倾斜,规避品类整体下行带来的平台风险。

2. 上市平台的风险提示:四家头部上市集成灶企业都在进行大规模资本运作,涉及卖壳、跨界投资、重资产布局新赛道、并购保壳等操作,部分企业已经面临退市风险,上市平台需要持续关注这类周期型企业的经营风险,及时做好风险警示,规范相关资本运作。

3. 平台运营方向调整:当前集成灶品牌的需求已经从扩张扩张转为收缩转型,品牌对流量扶持、扩产支持的需求下降,对转型服务、资本服务的需求上升,平台可以调整运营策略,适配品牌新的需求,创造新的营收点。

本文为研究厨电产业、地产后周期品类转型的研究者提供了最新的产业动向和典型案例,核心干货如下:

1. 产业最新动向:集成灶作为曾经的厨电细分新兴赛道,在地产红利消退后,四家头部上市企业集体陷入营收缩水、利润亏损的困境,行业已经结束成长期进入深度调整期,四家企业根据自身情况做出了完全不同的战略选择,形成了卖壳离场、收缩财务投资、押注新赛道、并购保壳四种差异化转型路径,是周期型行业企业转型的典型样本。

2. 行业暴露的新问题:本次行业调整暴露出很多值得研究的新问题,比如集成灶行业过度绑定新房需求,渗透率提升不及预期,价格战内卷严重,原来的先发优势和渠道壁垒无法抵御需求端的系统性风险,企业跨界转型也面临短期投入大、盈利难的共性问题。

3. 研究价值:本次四家头部企业的转型博弈,为研究者研究地产后周期品类的发展规律、上市公司困境应对策略、跨界转型的成败逻辑提供了鲜活的研究对象,也为研究周期型产业的价值重塑提供了最新的案例支撑。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article reveals the different strategic choices four leading Chinese integrated cooking range companies—dubbed the "Four Little Dragons"—have made amid an industry-wide downturn, and summarizes key takeaways on the current state of the sector:

1. Industry overview: As a post-real-estate-cycle category closely tied to new home deliveries, the integrated cooking range industry has been hit hard by plummeting new home deliveries in recent years. In 2025, total industry retail sales dropped 43.1% year-on-year, with both sales volume and prices falling across online and offline channels. The industry has transitioned from its growth stage to a deep adjustment trough.

2. Status and choices of the four leading players: Former industry leader Zhejiang Meida has seen its business shrink by nearly 80%, and has chosen to sell a controlling stake to cross-border e-commerce capital and exit the sector. After its revenue declined, Marseller has cut production capacity and made financial investments in technology sectors to hedge against industry risks. Following losses in its core business, Yitian Intelligence has bet on cloud computing as a second growth curve, and is still in the loss-making investment stage. *ST ShuaiFeng faces delisting risk and plans to acquire power assets to retain its listing qualification.

3. Industry outlook: None of the four companies' transformation efforts have yielded results so far. The industry will not emerge from the downturn until the existing stock replacement cycle arrives.

This article provides actionable insights on industry trends and strategic options for integrated cooking range and kitchen appliance brands, as outlined below:

1. Industry and consumer trends: The integrated cooking range industry has been severely impacted by the real estate downturn, which has shaken core demand. The sector is currently squeezed by three pressures: low penetration, an unrealized replacement cycle, and cutthroat price competition. The entire industry is facing falling sales volume and prices, and existing channel barriers and first-mover brand advantages have become largely ineffective amid collapsing demand. The industry has now entered a period of deep adjustment.

2. Strategic responses for brands in different situations: For leading brands whose core business has shrunk sharply, selling controlling stakes to cross-industry capital to cash out and exit is a viable option. Brands with sufficient capital can cut production capacity and hedge against cyclical industry risks by making financial investments in technology sectors. Brands whose core business can no longer generate profits can bet on emerging sectors to build a second growth curve. Listed brands facing delisting risk can acquire mature operating assets to quickly adjust their financial statements and retain their listing status.

3. Risk reminder: The growth model that relies heavily on the single dividend of the real estate cycle is no longer sustainable. Brands need to prepare early to hedge against cyclical risks and develop demand from existing stock replacement.

This article shares insights on industry conditions, risk warnings and opportunity references for kitchen appliance and integrated cooking range sellers:

1. Current industry conditions and risk warnings: As a strongly post-real-estate-cycle category, integrated cooking range demand has been directly hit by sharp declines in new housing development investment and sales area in recent years. In 2025, industry retail sales fell 43.1% year-on-year, with offline dealers facing sluggish turnover and ongoing cutthroat price competition online. The entire industry is grappling with falling volume and prices, and operating a core integrated cooking range business currently comes with extremely high performance pressure.

2. Recommended response strategies: Sellers in different positions can adopt matching strategies: Large leading sellers can choose to transfer controlling stakes to cash out, or cut production capacity to control costs and diversify cyclical risks through financial investments, based on their own situation. Small and medium-sized sellers experiencing stagnant core business growth can explore new sectors to find a second growth curve, while sellers facing survival crises can revitalize their business by acquiring high-quality assets.

3. Future opportunities: The industry is currently in a deep adjustment period. After the downturn, a demand window for kitchen replacement in existing homes will open, and the sector still has long-term growth room. Entry of cross-industry capital will also bring new changes to the industry.

This article provides insights on demand shifts and transformation directions for integrated cooking range and kitchen appliance manufacturers:

1. Current production-side demand: Industry demand has shrunk sharply, with total retail sales falling more than 40% year-on-year. Original capacity expansion plans are no longer aligned with current market demand—leading brand Marseller has already suspended its planned 559 million RMB smart kitchen appliance expansion project. Manufacturers should prioritize cutting capacity, controlling costs, and avoiding blind expansion at this stage.

2. Recommended transformation paths: If the core business can no longer generate sufficient cash flow, factories can choose a transformation path based on their capital and resource endowments. Capital-rich factories can adopt an asset-light model and make financial investments in technology sectors to diversify cyclical risks; they can also pursue an asset-heavy model by entering government-supported emerging sectors such as cloud computing to pursue a second growth curve. Listed manufacturing entities facing survival crises can acquire mature operating assets to retain their listing qualification.

3. Key takeaways for transformation: Manufacturers cannot over-rely on incremental demand from new housing development. They need to develop the existing stock replacement market in advance, and design products adapted to replacement demand to hedge against cyclical risks from over-reliance on a single sector.

This article provides references on industry trends, client pain points and business opportunities for service providers across the integrated cooking range supply chain:

1. Industry development trends: The integrated cooking range industry has ended its growth phase driven by real estate dividends, and entered a stage of deep adjustment and value reshaping. All original leading brands are facing performance difficulties and have launched transformation efforts one after another. Supply chain service providers need to adjust their business direction in line with industry changes.

2. Core client pain points: The core challenges facing integrated cooking range brands are shrinking core revenue, sharp profit declines or even losses, with some listed brands facing delisting risk. The root cause is collapsing industry demand driven by shrinking new home sales, and price competition that further compresses profit margins. Most brands now have urgent needs for transformation and脱困.

3. Potential business opportunities: Service providers can develop new business lines aligned with brands' transformation and脱困 needs. These include financial advisory services for cross-industry investments, operational support for brands entering new sectors, and M&A and restructuring services for at-risk listed companies. Service providers can also prepare early to enter the existing kitchen replacement aftermarket to capture long-term demand.

This article provides insights on industry dynamics and risk mitigation for home appliance e-commerce platforms and listed platforms:

1. Adjustments for investment attraction and operations: The entire integrated cooking range category is facing falling volume and prices due to the real estate downturn, with leading brands generally recording more than 70% revenue declines. Platforms need to adjust their valuation logic for the category, reduce resource allocation to this real estate-dependent category, and mitigate platform risks stemming from the sector's overall downturn.

2. Risk warnings for listed platforms: All four leading listed integrated cooking range companies are conducting large-scale capital operations, including sell-offs, cross-industry investment, heavy-asset expansion into new sectors, and M&A for delisting protection. Some companies already face delisting risk. Listed platforms need to continuously monitor operational risks of these cyclical companies, issue timely risk warnings, and regulate related capital operations.

3. Adjustments to platform operations: Integrated cooking range brands have shifted from expansion to contraction and transformation. Their demand for traffic support and capacity expansion has declined, while demand for transformation services and capital services has increased. Platforms can adjust their operational strategies to align with brands' new needs and develop new revenue streams.

This article provides the latest industry dynamics and typical cases for researchers studying kitchen appliance industry transformation and post-real-estate-cycle category development:

1. Latest industry dynamics: After the end of real estate dividends, the four leading listed companies in what was once a high-growth kitchen appliance niche have all faced shrinking revenue and profit losses. The industry has exited its growth phase and entered deep adjustment. The four companies have made entirely different strategic choices based on their own situations, forming four distinct transformation paths: selling out and exiting, cutting capacity and making financial investments, betting on a new growth track, and acquiring assets to retain listing status. This serves as a typical case study for enterprise transformation in cyclical industries.

2. New issues exposed by the industry downturn: This industry adjustment has revealed multiple new research-worthy issues, including the industry's over-reliance on new home demand, slower-than-expected penetration growth, severe cutthroat price competition, the inability of original first-mover advantages and channel barriers to withstand systemic demand-side risks, and the common challenge of high short-term investment costs and low profitability for cross-industry transformation.

3. Research value: The transformation race among these four leading companies provides researchers with a living case study to explore the development patterns of post-real-estate-cycle categories, the困境 response strategies of listed companies, and the success/failure logic of cross-industry transformation, as well as the latest case support for research on value reshaping in cyclical industries.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

地产周期退潮后,集成灶四小龙在业绩寒冬中各谋出路。

曾靠"下排油烟"技术开创集成灶赛道的浙江美大(002677.SZ),在登陆A股十余年后,走到了资本命运的交叉路口。

2026年7月10日,浙江美大披露其筹划易主的消息,并且透露潜在接盘方来自跨境电商赛道,而在公告披露之前,公司的股价也罕见的出现连续两天涨停的行情。过去三年,随着新建住宅交付量断崖式下跌,集成灶这个高度捆绑新房装修的后周期品类被直接打入寒冬,浙江美大的营收从二十亿量级一路缩水至不足五亿,净利润较峰值蒸发近九成,原有的渠道壁垒与品牌先发优势在需求消失面前无力回天。

将镜头拉远便会发现,A股集成灶板块代表性的四家上市公司——浙江美大、火星人(300894.SZ)、亿田智能(300911.SZ)、*ST帅电(605336.SH),正集体陷入营收缩水、利润转亏乃至退市警示的泥沼之中。它们曾共享同一轮地产上行周期的红利,如今也共同承受品类渗透率低、换新周期未至、价格战持续内卷的三重挤压。

有所区别的是,笔者梳理公开资料发现,在集成灶行业乃至厨电行业跌入低谷的时候,四家企业为了生存,交出了四份不同的答卷:有的引跨界资本卖壳离场,有的收缩产能转做科技财务创投,有的押注重资产算力业务试图开辟第二曲线,有的急迫并购实体资产以求保壳。

浙江美大的停牌谋易主,不过是撕开了这个厨电细分行业深度调整期最真实的一角。

上市十四载夏氏父子撤退

根据浙江美大2026年7月10日披露的公告,公司实控人夏志生、夏鼎所涉股份转让比例范围为30%以内,而潜在的接盘方是跨境电商行业的公司。

这份简短公告背后,是一家集成灶老牌龙头长达数年的基本面持续失血后的无奈之举。作为集成灶赛道开创者与A股首家集成灶上市公司,浙江美大凭借独家下排油烟核心技术及遍布下沉市场的庞大经销商网络,曾在2021年攀上历史顶峰——当年营收21.64亿元、净利润6.65亿元,规模与盈利能力断层领跑全行业,是市场公认的初代霸主。

但转折自2022年悄然而至,随着房地产开发投资与新房销售面积双双大幅下挫,集成灶品类因高度绑定新房交付场景首当其冲,线下经销商动销疲软,线上价格战此起彼伏,浙江美大的好日子戛然而止。

2022年至2023年,公司营收逐年收缩,净利润仅勉强维持阶段性企稳;真正的业绩崩塌出现在2024—2025年,营收连续近乎腰斩,2025年全年营收仅剩4.54亿元,较2021年峰值缩水近八成,净利润暴跌近90%,仅余千万级别;进入2026年一季度,下滑颓势仍未扭转,营收与净利同比继续大幅下探,业绩持续承压。

奥维云网(AVC)数据亦佐证了集成灶全行业的下滑:2025年厨卫全品类零售额1613亿元,同比下滑8.5%;其中集成灶波动尤为剧烈,零售额同比大降43.1%,线上销额同比下降43.39%、销量同比下降35.74%,线下销额同比下降33.98%,且线上、线下均价分别同比下跌11.91%和6.32%。行业同时遭受规模收缩与价格承压的双重夹击,集成灶已从成长期品类被迫进入深度调整与价值重塑的低谷盘整阶段。

在主业增长出现瓶颈后,浙江美大选择开始跨界财务投资以对冲厨电周期风险。

2025年6月,公司出资1.1亿元参与国内头部自动驾驶企业魔视智能的融资,拿下后者4.8657%股权。3个月之后,魔视智能向港交所递交主板IPO招股书,公司上市成功,浙江美大自然能够享受股份退出机制带来的收益。

但这远不能覆盖原有核心业务下滑对于业绩的冲击,而今筹划控股权转让、引跨境电商背景买方入局,则意味着夏氏家族最终选择了更彻底的"退出"。若交易最终落地,昔日"集成灶第一股"也将翻开新的一页。

行业寒冬里的众生相

如果说浙江美大的控股权筹划是行业龙头在漫长低谷后的主动转身,那么另外三家同处A股市场的集成灶代表企业,则在业绩持续失血的压力下,各自走出了一条截然不同的求生曲线。它们面临的底色是一致的:国家统计局数据显示,2025年全国房地产开发投资同比下降17.2%,住宅销售面积下降9.2%,作为强地产后周期品类的集成灶,其需求底盘被直接撼动。奥维云网监测的数据更为直观,2025年集成灶品类零售额同比下滑43.1%,线上、线下均价同步下探,行业陷入量价双杀的泥潭。

在这样的环境下,火星人、亿田智能和*ST帅丰虽同为“集成灶四小龙”,却做出了完全不同的战略抉择。

曾凭借线上渠道运营能力一度超越浙江美大的火星人,最先感受到的是增长天花板的寒意。2021年其营收曾达到23.19亿元、净利润3.76亿元的高点,但随后便随着新房市场萎缩而步步滑落。到了2025年,公司营收已缩水至7.71亿元,同比降幅扩大至44%,全年更是录得2.96亿元的大额亏损,扣非净利润同步转负。进入2026年,公司从营收到净利润持续下滑。

面对这一局面,火星人选择了相对稳健的“收缩+分散投资”策略。2025年公司拿出超2.68亿元自有资金搭建双层创投布局:一方面出资1.98亿元设立全资产业基金共青城超凡探索,直接投向人形机器人、通用AI算法赛道的初创企业;另一方面拿出7000万元认购红杉旗下杭州红杉晟恒私募基金份额,借助专业机构间接布局宇树科技等机器人赛道标的,全部投资定位为财务性布局。进入2026年,厨电行业发展依旧低迷,火星人更是主动叫停了原计划耗资5.59亿元的智能厨电扩产项目。

与火星人的“轻资产”财务投资不同,亿田智能则选择了一条更为沉重但也更具想象空间的“双轮驱动”之路,只是这条路目前看来荆棘密布。

亿田智能在2021年上市第二年年达到业绩顶峰后,便开启了漫长的下坡路。2025年,其营收仅剩3.38亿元,较峰值缩水超七成,全年净亏损1.72亿元,2026年一季度的颓势更是未见好转,营收同比暴跌62.13%,单季亏损超过3500万元。在主业几乎丧失自我造血能力的背景下,亿田智能将翻盘的希望寄托在了算力业务这个第二增长曲线上。

自2023年起,公司成立全资子公司亿算智能切入算力赛道,位于甘肃庆阳的国产万卡级智算中心已正式投运,首期2500P绿色算力已实现对美图秀秀、无问芯穹等客户的推理服务输出。2025年4月,公司更是签署了共建国产十万卡算力集群的战略协议,预期总投资高达55亿元。然而,算力业务短期大量的投入不但没有带来盈利,反而一定程度上吞噬了公司的利润,2025年底公司只能卖掉600台服务器回血。进入2026年,公司算力业务再遭暴击,因为没有订单,公司退出了算力投资基金,和无问芯穹的5年长单也在持续了不到两年时间被叫停。

但亿田智能依然选择押注算力赛道,并表述还将投入5.5亿购买服务器及相关设备。但在主业持续失血、新业务尚需时日的困境中,用当下亏损博取未来算力红利的策略,无疑是一场“孤掷一注”的长跑。

相比之下,曾经的“集成灶四小龙”之一——如今的*ST帅丰,面临的已经不再是发展问题,而是生死存亡的保壳之战。由于2025年营收仅2.27亿元且净利润亏损5642.12万元,公司已被实施退市风险警示。进入2026年,经营状况并未出现好转,一季度营收同比下滑超五成,亏损仍在持续。

对于帅丰而言,依靠集成灶主业在短时间内修复营收和利润指标已不现实,唯有通过外延式并购迅速改变财务报表的结构。为此,公司计划斥资4.5~5亿元,全资收购一家电力智能设备企业惠嘉信息。这一举措的逻辑非常直接:通过并表成熟的电力设备资产,迅速做大营收规模,同时利用新业务的利润来填补厨电主业的亏损,从而在短期内满足监管要求,规避退市风险。

纵观四家登陆A股的集成灶企业,其业绩增长高度依赖新房交付市场,如今地产新房规模持续萎缩,整个赛道的增长红利已经基本消失。在此背景下,四家企业根据自身的能力开始出现分化,势必有着不同的选择:浙江美大引跨境电商资本卖控股权、火星人收缩产能做科技财务创投、亿田智能豪赌算力第二曲线、*ST帅丰急购电力资产保壳。

本质上都是上市公司在行业深度调整期中,围绕“业绩反转”或是“套现走人”而做出的不同博弈。谁能真正穿越本轮厨电存量置换前的漫长低谷,仍需时间给出答案。

注:文/曹晟源,文章来源:钛媒体(公众号ID:taimeiti),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:钛媒体

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

集成灶行业近年的发展状况如何?

集成灶属于强地产后周期品类,2022年起受新房交付量下滑影响进入发展寒冬,2025年行业零售额同比大降43.1%,线上、线下均价分别同比下跌11.91%、6.32%,整体陷入量价双杀局面,已进入深度调整与价值重塑的低谷盘整阶段。

A股集成灶四小龙具体指哪些企业?

A股集成灶四小龙是国内集成灶赛道的四家代表性上市公司,分别为集成灶赛道开创者浙江美大、主打线上渠道的火星人、亿田智能以及*ST帅丰,此前均受益于地产上行周期红利,近年受行业寒冬影响业绩集体下滑。

行业寒冬下集成灶企业有哪些可选的求生路径?

不同企业可结合自身情况选择差异化路径,头部企业可引入跨界资本出让控股权,也可通过财务投资布局人形机器人、AI算法等科技赛道,部分企业可押注算力业务开辟第二曲线,面临退市风险的企业可通过并购合规实体资产保壳。

亿田智能的算力业务布局进展如何?

亿田智能2023年成立全资子公司亿算智能切入算力赛道,位于甘肃庆阳的国产万卡级智算中心已正式投运,首期2500P绿色算力已实现商用,曾签署总投资55亿元的十万卡算力集群共建协议,目前仍在持续押注算力赛道投入。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

赞 +1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0