广告
加载中

Seesaw的最后一天 Manner的门店数近2500家

晓样 2026-06-10 13:53
晓样 2026/06/10 13:53

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文复盘了中国新消费从资本狂热到全面退潮的行业发展历程,提炼出值得普通人参考的核心信息与经验。

1. 核心行业事件:2021年是新消费投资的巅峰,全年完成842起投融资总额907亿元,大量品牌仅十多家店就拿到数十亿估值,靠烧钱讲故事扩张,到2026年绝大多数品牌已经破产倒闭,包括曾是精品咖啡标杆的Seesaw也进入破产清算程序。

2. 成败规律:潮水退去后活下来且高速增长的品牌,都不靠估值讲故事,而是扎实做好经营,比如蜜雪冰城4.6万家店年净利45亿,Manner咖啡门店近2500家靠高性价比站稳市场。

3. 经验:做任何事都不能被风口和概念迷惑,只有扎根真实需求、做好基本功才能长久生存。

本文通过大量新消费品牌的成败案例,给品牌经营者总结了需要规避的陷阱和可借鉴的发展方向。

1. 需要规避的核心陷阱:不要走“烧钱换规模+讲故事套估值”的发展路线,忽略单店盈利、坪效、复购这些传统经营指标,哪怕拿到多轮头部资本融资,最终也会因为资金链断裂走向破产,Seesaw、虎头局等都是典型案例。

2. 当前消费趋势:消费者预期转弱,更偏好高性价比、真实产品力的商品,高端概念营销的效果大幅下滑,价格带整体下移,喜茶从30+降价到15+就是明显信号。

3. 正确发展路径:要先跑通单店盈利模型,再逐步扩张,可以向上延伸掌控供应链降低成本,适配当前消费者的务实需求,蜜雪冰城自建工厂就是很好的参考样本。

本文梳理了新消费行业的周期变化,给各类零售餐饮卖家总结了风险提示和发展机会。

1. 核心风险提示:过去资本驱动的“烧钱扩张换估值”模式已经完全失效,依赖融资续命、没有跑通单店盈利模型的品牌哪怕名气再大,最终也会被市场淘汰,卖家不要盲目跟风融资扩张,忽略自身盈利能力建设。

2. 消费需求变化:当前消费者整体预期转弱,储蓄意愿提升,消费更偏向务实,对高性价比、真实产品力的商品需求更高,靠概念做溢价的营销方式已经很难起效。

3. 发展机会:高性价比大众消费赛道仍然有很大增长空间,卖家可以学习蜜雪冰城掌控上游供应链、Manner小门店低定价的模式,先扎实跑通单店盈利,再逐步扩张,避免盲目冒进的风险。

本文通过新消费品牌的成败经验,给消费品生产工厂带来了多方面的发展启示与商业机会。

1. 生产端需求变化:当前成功的终端品牌越来越重视供应链自主权和成本控制,头部品牌蜜雪冰城选择自建工厂掌控原材料生产,说明工厂可以深度对接终端品牌的上游供应链需求,绑定成熟品牌获得稳定长期订单,拓展自身业务空间。

2. 产品设计需求变化:现在消费者越来越务实,更接受高性价比的产品,工厂在产品设计和生产环节,要更多聚焦品质提升和成本控制,减少不必要的概念性包装成本,适配终端品牌的价格定位需求。

3. 自身发展启示:工厂要走扎实发展的路线,深耕生产端的能力优势,不要盲目跟风扩张造概念,打磨好产品品质和成本优势,就能在新消费退潮后获得更多商业机会。

本文梳理了新消费行业的周期变化,总结了行业当前的痛点和发展趋势,给服务商指明了新的业务方向。

1. 行业整体发展趋势:新消费行业已经从资本驱动的讲故事扩张阶段,转向了经营驱动的深耕盈利阶段,整个行业的需求从流量增长转向盈利提升,服务商需要调整自身业务方向适配新的行业需求。

2. 当前品牌客户的核心痛点:大量过去靠融资扩张的品牌,没有跑通单店盈利模型,也没有稳定可控的供应链能力,抗风险能力极弱,遇到资本退潮就快速资金链断裂,生存危机严重。

3. 新的服务机会:服务商可以围绕品牌单店盈利打磨、供应链成本控制、消费者复购运营开发针对性解决方案,帮助品牌做好基础经营,替代过去服务品牌融资讲故事的业务,适配新的行业发展阶段。

新消费行业的周期变化,给平台商调整招商、运营策略带来了多方面的启发,帮助平台规避风险抓住新机会。

1. 品牌需求变化:当前品牌不再单纯追求流量扩张,更重视真实盈利和供应链效率提升,平台需要调整自身服务体系,从过去的流量赋能转向经营赋能,满足品牌新的核心需求。

2. 招商策略调整:过去平台偏好高估值、高热度的网红品牌,现在需要转向优先选择已经跑通单店模型、产品力扎实的品牌,优化平台入驻品牌结构,降低整体经营风险。

3. 风险规避方向:平台要警惕高估值低盈利网红品牌带来的合作风险,不要盲目追捧热度,合作考察环节要重点看品牌真实经营数据,比如坪效、复购、单店盈利,不要只看融资规模和估值,保障平台自身经营安全。

本文完整记录了中国新消费行业从资本狂热到退潮的发展过程,给产业研究提供了丰富的现实样本与研究结论。

1. 当前产业新动向:新消费行业已经结束了资本驱动的扩张阶段,正式进入产品驱动的深耕阶段,资本退潮、居民消费预期转弱、储蓄意愿提升是当前产业发展的核心背景。

2. 产业发展暴露的新问题:资本过度介入下,“讲故事套估值”的模式扭曲了行业发展逻辑,造成大量社会资源错配,很多没有创造真实价值的品牌快速崛起又快速倒闭,给供应商、员工、投资人都带来了损失。

3. 研究启示:验证了“消费者用脚投票、经营核心是算账卖货”的传统商业本质,新的可持续商业模式是围绕真实消费需求打磨成本优势,跑通盈利模型再扩张,为后续产业研究、政策制定提供了鲜活的现实依据。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article reviews the development of China’s new consumer sector from its capital-fueled boom to the full-scale retreat of investment, distilling key takeaways and lessons for general audiences.

1. Key industry milestones: 2021 marked the peak of new consumer investment, with 842 financing deals totaling 90.7 billion yuan. During this boom, countless brands earned billion-dollar valuations after opening just a dozen of stores, expanding by burning cash to hype up their narrative. By 2026, the vast majority of these brands have gone bankrupt – even Seesaw, once a leading benchmark for specialty coffee, has entered bankruptcy liquidation.

2. Patterns of success and failure: Brands that survived the bust and continue growing rapidly all reject the valuation-driven hype model, and focus instead on solid operational fundamentals. For example, Mixue Ice City operates 46,000 stores and generates 4.5 billion yuan in annual net profit, while Manner Coffee has built a stable market position with its high-value-for-money offering across nearly 2,500 locations.

3. Core takeaway: No venture should be blinded by hype and market bubbles. Long-term survival depends only on addressing real consumer needs and getting the basics right.

Drawing on a large collection of success and failure cases from China’s new consumer wave, this article summarizes key pitfalls to avoid and actionable development paths for brand operators.

1. Critical pitfall to avoid: Brands that pursue the "burn cash for scale + hype for valuation" growth model, and neglect core operational metrics like unit profitability, space productivity and customer retention, will eventually end up in bankruptcy from broken capital chains – even after securing multiple rounds of funding from top-tier investors. Seesaw and Tiger Head局 are two prominent examples.

2. Current consumer trends: As consumer expectations soften, shoppers increasingly favor high-value-for-money products with tangible performance. Marketing built on premium, abstract concepts has seen steep declines in effectiveness, and the overall market price point has shifted downward. Heytea’s price cut from above 30 yuan to 15+ yuan is a clear signal of this shift.

3. Recommended growth path: Brands should first validate a profitable unit economics model before expanding gradually. They can also move upstream to control their own supply chains and cut costs, aligning with today’s consumers’ pragmatic demands. Mixue Ice City’s in-house factory model is a strong reference case.

This article maps out the full cyclical shift of China’s new consumer industry, and outlines key risk warnings and growth opportunities for all types of retail and food service sellers.

1. Core risk warning: The old capital-driven "grow by burning cash for valuation" model is completely obsolete. Brands that rely on financing to stay afloat and have not validated a profitable unit model will eventually be eliminated by the market – no matter how well-known they are. Sellers should avoid blindly following the trend of financing-fueled expansion, and should never neglect building their own profitability capacity.

2. Shifting consumer demand: Against a backdrop of softening consumer expectations and rising household savings rates, today’s shoppers are far more pragmatic. They prioritize high value for money and tangible product performance, and marketing that builds premiums on abstract concepts no longer works.

3. Growth opportunities: The value-for-money mass consumption track still holds substantial room for growth. Sellers can learn from Mixue Ice City’s upstream supply chain control strategy and Manner’s small-store, low-price model: focus on validating profitable unit economics first, expand gradually, and avoid the risk of reckless overgrowth.

Drawing on the successes and failures of new consumer brands, this article outlines key development insights and business opportunities for consumer goods manufacturers.

1. Shifting demand on the production side: Today’s successful terminal brands increasingly prioritize supply chain autonomy and cost control. Leading brand Mixue Ice City’s decision to build its own factories to control raw material production means manufacturers can deepen partnerships with terminal brands to meet their upstream supply chain needs, lock in stable long-term orders by binding to mature brands, and expand their own business scope.

2. Shifting product design demand: As consumers grow more pragmatic and favor high-value-for-money offerings, manufacturers should focus more on quality improvement and cost control in product design and production, cut unnecessary spending on conceptual packaging, and align with terminal brands’ price positioning requirements.

3. Development takeaways for manufacturers: Manufacturers should prioritize steady, fundamentals-driven growth, lean into their competitive advantages in production, avoid blindly chasing expansion and hype, and focus on refining product quality and cost advantages. This approach will leave manufacturers well-positioned to capture more business opportunities after the new consumer boom.

This article maps out the cyclical shift of China’s new consumer industry, summarizes current industry pain points and trends, and outlines new business directions for industry service providers.

1. Overall industry trend: The new consumer sector has shifted from a capital-driven, hype-focused expansion phase to an operation-driven, profit-focused deepening phase. Industry-wide demand has shifted from growing traffic to improving profitability, so service providers need to adjust their business offerings to match this new market demand.

2. Core pain points for current brand clients: A large number of brands that expanded via financing never built a profitable unit model or stable, controllable supply chain capacity. They have extremely low risk resilience, and quickly suffered capital chain breaks when capital retreated, leaving them facing severe survival crises.

3. New service opportunities: Service providers can develop targeted solutions focused on helping brands optimize unit-store profitability, control supply chain costs, and improve repeat customer retention. This replaces the old business of serving brands’ financing and hype efforts, and aligns with the industry’s new development stage.

The cyclical shift of the new consumer industry offers multiple insights for platforms to adjust their merchant recruitment and operation strategies, helping platforms mitigate risks and capture new opportunities.

1. Shifting brand demand: Today’s brands no longer prioritize pure traffic expansion, and focus more on real profitability and supply chain efficiency improvements. Platforms need to adjust their service systems, shifting from the old model of traffic enablement to operational enablement to meet brands’ new core demands.

2. Adjustments to merchant recruitment strategy: Whereas platforms previously preferred high-valuation, high-hype viral brands, they should now prioritize brands that have already validated a profitable unit model and built solid product capabilities. This optimizes the platform’s merchant mix and reduces overall operational risk.

3. Risk mitigation guidance: Platforms should watch out for collaboration risks from high-valuation, low-profitability viral brands, avoid blindly chasing popularity, and prioritize reviewing real operational metrics – such as space productivity, repeat purchase rate, and unit-store profitability – during due diligence, rather than only looking at financing scale and valuation, to protect the platform’s operational security.

This article provides a complete account of China’s new consumer industry’s trajectory from capital-fueled boom to investment retreat, offering rich empirical cases and research conclusions for industrial studies.

1. Current new industry dynamics: The new consumer industry has ended its capital-driven expansion phase and officially entered a product-driven deepening phase. The core background for current industry development is retreating capital, softening household consumption expectations, and rising household savings rates.

2. New problems exposed by industry development: Excessive capital intervention allowed the "hype for valuation" model to distort industry development logic, leading to massive misallocation of social resources. Many brands that created no real value rose rapidly only to collapse just as quickly, inflicting losses on suppliers, employees and investors alike.

3. Research insights: This case study validates the traditional business truth that "consumers vote with their feet, and the core of business is turning a profit selling goods." The new sustainable business model centers on building cost advantages around real consumer demand, validating a profitable model before expanding. This study provides fresh empirical evidence for future industrial research and policy formulation.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

作者|晓样

发布|消费纪

2026年6月一纸破产清算申请,把Seesaw Coffee送入了终局。

这个曾被视为“中国精品咖啡标杆”的品牌巅峰时拥有135家门店,如今只剩34家。

供应商追债,员工讨薪,创始人被限制高消费。

单店估值过亿,获得过喜茶、黑蚁等知名机构的多轮融资,最终以被执行金额1400万谢幕。

这不只是一个品牌的故事,是一个时代的缩影。

01

那个“用「估值」定义世界”的夏天

2021年是中国新消费投资的巅峰,市场的热钱多到烫手,一套“互联网思维重做消费品”的叙事统治了整个VC圈。

那年新消费赛道完成了842起投融资,总额907亿元。我们看到了一连串今天回看近乎荒诞的定价:

喜茶800家店估值600亿,刚融完资就把钱砸给了只有30多家店的Seesaw。据虎嗅报道,整个过程像一场“争分夺秒的竞速”。

墨茉点心局,不到30家店,半年完成五轮融资,估值20亿。虎头局,仅有10家店,两轮融资近5000万美元,GGV、老虎环球、红杉、IDG全数进场,投后估值同样20亿。

这套叙事的核心公式很简单:找到高毛利品类+ 烧钱换规模 + 讲出万店/国潮/国际化的故事 = 百亿估值 = 成功退出。

至于单店模型是否跑通?坪效是否健康?复购率是否真实?

这些属于“传统生意”的指标,在那个年代被视为落伍。

没有人关心一家店能不能赚钱,大家只关心这个故事能不能在下一轮融资里翻倍。

“一碗面估值一个亿”,不是段子,是那个夏天真实的报价单。奈雪的茶港交所敲钟,市值300亿,宣称要做“中国星巴克”;遇见小面要做“中国麦当劳”。

青山资本张野说“未来十年是黄金时代”,梅花创投吴世春说“新消费永不眠”,高瓴张磊在北海道滑雪说“中国一定有机会诞生新的欧莱雅”。

那年所有人都相信,这场盛宴才刚刚开始。

02

盛宴的终结,

从来不是一声巨响

2021年双11,天猫成交额5403亿,京东3793亿。

但这是最后一次公布战绩,此后的数字,不再配得上一场狂欢。

2022年成交额消失了,狂欢的BGM突然静音,灯光亮起,人们开始看清场上到底发生了什么。

最先崩塌的,是那些当初最疯狂的品牌。

虎头局的麻薯老虎卷曾让人排队三小时,融资近3亿,最终欠款2亿,裁员超千人,创始人被限高。

墨茉点心局从北京全线撤退,退回长沙大本营。

克莉丝汀巅峰超1000家店,连亏9年后全部关闭,上海人吃了半辈子的面包说没就没了。

Lady M一片千层蛋糕卖75块的纽约贵妇甜品,曾引发黄牛代购,最终关掉中国内地所有门店。

许留山芒果甜品的代名词,近300家店被清盘。

在美妆个护领域,故事同样惨烈。

完美日记市值从160亿美元跌到不足零头,“中国欧莱雅”的故事已经被珀莱雅想接棒。

花西子被李佳琦一手捧红,在79元眉笔事件后声量销量都断崖式下跌。

浮气Fomomy的旗舰店挂出四个字:“真的倒闭了。”伊蒂之屋韩国平价美妆鼻祖,中国门店全部关闭,女孩们的第一盒眉粉成了回忆。

每日优鲜融资超百亿后资金链断裂,“30分钟达”变成“永远未达”。

寺库奢侈品目标电商第一股,结果用户寄卖的爱马仕拿不回来,而后申请破产。

言几又把书店开成了美术馆,结果全国几十家门店一夜关停,欠薪、欠书款、欠房租。

即便是当年最耀眼的明星也未能幸免。

奈雪的茶股价从19.8港元跌到0.66港元,市值蒸发殆尽。喜茶从高端直营转向开放加盟,价格从30+降到15+,努力活成自己曾经看不上的样子。

就连北京老佛爷百货都关门了,巴黎那家店营业了133年,历经两次世界大战不曾停业。

北京的老佛爷甚至没有穿越新消费的周期。

它们曾那么用力地宣告要改变世界,最后连自己的公司都没能保住。那个 “敢十家店估二十亿、新消费永不眠”的 夏天再也不在了 。

03

潮水退去,

谁在裸泳,谁穿着泳裤

当“烧钱换规模”的公式全面失效,人们才重新想起一个古老的道理:

算账和卖货,消费者是用脚投票的。

而当人们回过神来,才发现不只是VC的钱在退潮,自己口袋里的钱也在退。

2600点时你期待4000点,4000点真的来了。

但你的房价从800万跌到500万,首付蒸发,贷款不变。

央行数据显示,中国人存了166万亿,定期存款占73.4%,消费贷利率低至2.91%,国家贴息——但没人借钱。

因为是那个“明天一定更好”的预期似乎不在了。

然而就在同一片废墟里,有人走了一条完全不同的路。

蜜雪冰城,2021年所有人排队买喜茶的时候,它在郑州默默建工厂,自己生产奶茶粉、果酱、杯子。如今4.6万家店,一天卖出4000万杯,年净利45亿。

创始人被问护城河是什么,他答:“我们就是个卖原材料的。”

泡泡玛特在被嘲笑为“智商税”的那些年,安静地等待LABUBU续约,如今卖出142亿。

老铺黄金2025年营收273亿,同比暴增221%,净利润50亿,比同行贵300%,柜台前排满年轻人。

Manner咖啡从街角几平米的窗口起步,走出一条和Seesaw完全不同的路——小而快,密而轻,把一杯精品咖啡的价格压到15块。

品牌的增长来不是谁融资更多,那些忙着单店估值过亿、万店计划、闪电扩张。PPT上每一页都好看的老板。

最终发现单店没跑通、复购没回来、下一轮的钱也没到。

04

你相信的,

并不总如你所愿

我们这代人,完整地经历了一场"预期"的大型破产。

2026年的夏天Seesaw的破产清算还在走程序,Manner的窗口前永远有下一个拿着手机取单的人。

赢家和输家之间隔的从来不是谁融资更多、谁更努力。它们从不把估值当成绩单,更不会做只有投资人想看的东西。

但当潮水退去,只有那些在泥土里扎了根的东西,才能留下来。

注:文/晓样,文章来源:消费纪,本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:消费纪

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0