广告
加载中

欠债超3000万 昔日网红品牌撑不住了

天下网商 2026-06-10 10:36
天下网商 2026/06/10 10:36

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心梳理了曾经的国货底妆第一网红品牌blank me从崛起到被申请破产审查的全过程,能让普通读者了解新消费网红品牌的发展现状,获得清晰的经验参考,干货如下:

1. 核心事件信息:blank me母公司上海永熙欠债超3600万元,被曾经合作的营销服务商申请破产审查,目前相关程序还在法院审查阶段,并不等于已经破产。

2. 品牌崛起可参考经验:blank me当年精准切入国际品牌占据心智的底妆细分赛道,主打适合亚洲肤质的差异化定位,靠内容种草+多渠道电商转化的模式快速起量,一度拿下电商平台国货底妆类目第一,还获得国际资本的关注。

3. 品牌失败的警示:过度依赖营销投入和融资预期,忽视自身造血能力和现金流管理,当流量成本攀升、融资预期落空后,所有问题集中爆发,最终走向债务危机,新消费下半场“留下来”比“被看见”更重要。

blank me的案例给当下国货美妆品牌提供了非常多的经营启发,贴合品牌商关注的营销、趋势、战略等需求,核心干货如下:

1. 当前行业消费与竞争趋势:新消费行业已经从讲故事做认知的品牌建设周期,进入到要复购、要利润的品牌兑现周期,市场评价体系已经从看重GMV增长速度,转向看重复购率、利润率和现金流安全,行业出清速度明显加快。

2. 定位与营销的经验教训:切入高端细分赛道的差异化思路值得参考,但高端定位不能只靠营销叙事,需要匹配足够的研发投入和利润支撑;过度依赖流量种草的营销模式抗风险能力极弱,流量成本上涨后营销就会从投资变成拖垮品牌的成本。

3. 正确的战略方向:能穿越周期的新消费美妆品牌,都已经转向强化研发体系、会员运营、供应链管理,优先保证现金流安全,不再盲目追求短期销售额增长。

blank me的失速案例给美妆赛道的卖家提供了清晰的风险提示和方向参考,贴合卖家关注的机会变化、风险防控等需求,核心干货如下:

1. 当前赛道变化:美妆行业已经进入存量竞争阶段,近三年新锐美妆个护品牌出清速度明显加快,红极一时的HEDONE、浮气Fomomy、三谷等多个网红品牌都已经破产停运,单纯靠流量种草、融资讲故事的旧增长模式已经完全失效。

2. 核心风险提示:底妆赛道虽然有复购率高、用户黏性强的优势,但研发门槛高、产品迭代慢,对经营能力要求更高;过度依赖外部营销投入、自身造血能力不足、忽视现金流管理,是网红品牌倒下的核心原因,新入赛道的卖家需要避开这类误区。

3. 机会与方向:当下做美妆品牌,需要把经营重点放在提升复购率、用户留存、利润率上,优先保证现金流安全,强化研发和供应链能力,才有可能在行业出清中存活下来。

blank me等一批网红新消费品牌倒下,给美妆代工厂、包材商等生产端企业带来不少启示,贴合工厂关注的需求、机会、风险等内容,核心干货如下:

1. 合作端风险提示:新消费网红品牌的抗风险能力普遍较弱,一旦经营失速就会出现大规模账款拖欠,本次blank me破产案件中,代工厂、包材商都是债务追讨方,不少生产端企业已经因此蒙受损失,工厂需要警惕单一客户依赖带来的坏账风险。

2. 市场需求变化:当下美妆行业越来越看重产品品质和研发稳定性,尤其是底妆这类对肤感、安全性、生产稳定性要求高的赛道,具备优质研发和生产能力的工厂,能获得更多长期稳定的合作机会。

3. 经营调整启示:工厂给新消费品牌做生产配套时,需要合理设置账期,做好风险管控,避免品牌出问题波及自身的资金链;同时可以拓展多个不同类型的稳定客户,分散经营风险,提升自身抗风险能力。

blank me被营销服务商申请破产的事件,给服务新消费品牌的各类服务商带来非常直接的启示,贴合服务商关注的行业趋势、风险、解决方案等需求,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:当前新消费行业出清加速,网红品牌的淘汰率持续升高,服务商不能只看客户的热度和增长数据,需要更关注客户的经营健康度。

2. 核心客户痛点:大多数新锐网红品牌的核心痛点是自身造血能力不足,增长完全依赖融资和流量投放,一旦增长放缓、融资落空,就会无力支付营销、运营等服务费用,很多服务商最终只能通过法律追债,自身也会蒙受损失。

3. 风险应对方案:服务商给新品牌提供服务时,可以优化结算模式,降低长账期、垫资带来的风险;同时调整自身客户结构,优先选择经营健康、有稳定复购和现金流的客户,避免单一客户坏账给自身带来过大的经营冲击。

blank me等一批网红新消费品牌出局,给电商平台的招商、运营带来不少启发,贴合平台商关注的需求、风险、运营管理等内容,核心干货如下:

1. 商家需求变化:新消费品牌早期依赖平台提供流量和交易承接,进入品牌兑现周期后,商家更需要平台提供帮助提升用户留存、复购的运营支持,不再只追求流量供给。

2. 招商端调整启示:平台招商不能只看品牌的短期GMV增长和融资背景,需要多维度考察品牌的经营质量、现金流健康度和产品复购率,筛选真正具备长期经营能力的品牌入驻,降低整体平台的经营风险。

3. 运营与风险规避:平台可以加大对新品牌的经营引导,帮助商家建立“利润优先、现金流安全”的经营理念,同时建立经营异常品牌的预警机制,提前介入风险,保护供应商、消费者等多方的权益。

blank me事件是新消费下半场行业变化的典型样本,给产业研究提供了很多新的内容,贴合研究者关注的产业动向、商业模式等需求,核心干货如下:

1. 产业新动向:当前新消费已经从讲流量、讲增长的上半场,全面进入品牌兑现的下半场,行业出清速度明显加快,近三年来多个头部新锐网红品牌走向破产清算,市场评价体系已经彻底转变,从关注GMV和增长速度转向关注复购率、利润率和现金流安全。

2. 新暴露的行业问题:早期新消费流行的“投资人下场+细分赛道定位+流量种草+融资接力”的增长模式已经失效,这种模式下品牌只能快速积累知名度,无法沉淀真正的品牌资产,也无法建立稳定的自身造血能力,一旦流量成本上升、融资收紧,就会立刻陷入全面危机。

3. 研究方向启示:后续研究新消费品牌,需要更多关注经营能力、品牌资产积累等长期维度,新消费下半场的核心竞争力已经回归持续经营能力,而非一次性的爆款爆发。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article maps out the full journey of blank me, once China's top viral domestic base makeup brand, from its rapid rise to the recent bankruptcy review petition. It helps general readers understand the current state of China's new consumer viral brands and draws actionable insights:

1. Core event update: blank me's parent company Shanghai Yongxi owes more than 36 million RMB to creditors, and has been filed for bankruptcy review by a former marketing service partner. The case is still under court review, meaning the company has not entered formal bankruptcy yet.

2. Key takeaways from the brand's rise: blank me successfully carved out a niche in the base makeup category long dominated by established international brands, with a differentiated positioning focused on formulations suited for Asian skin types. It scaled rapidly via a combination of influencer content seeding and omni-channel e-commerce conversion, once claiming the top spot for domestic base makeup on major Chinese e-commerce platforms and attracting attention from global investors.

3. Warning signs from its collapse: The brand over-relied on marketing spending and fundraising expectations, while neglecting organic profitability and cash flow management. When rising user acquisition costs and failed fundraising rounds hit, all underlying problems erupted at once, leading to a full-blown debt crisis. This case demonstrates that in the second half of China's new consumer movement, sustainable operation matters far more than quick viral fame.

The downfall of blank me offers critical operational lessons for domestic Chinese beauty brands, aligned with brand owners' core concerns around marketing, industry trends and long-term strategy:

1. Current industry trends: The new consumer sector has shifted from an era of brand building focused on storytelling and awareness building, to one centered on delivering tangible business results via repeat purchases and profit. Market evaluation criteria have moved from prioritizing GMV growth to focusing on repeat purchase rates, profit margins and cash flow safety, and industry consolidation has accelerated sharply.

2. Lessons on positioning and marketing: blank me's strategy of targeting a high-end niche segment with differentiated positioning remains a viable approach, but premium positioning cannot rely on marketing narratives alone—it requires matching investment in product R&D and sustainable profit margins. A marketing model over-reliant on influencer content seeding carries extremely low risk resistance: once traffic costs rise, marketing shifts from a growth investment to a crippling cost burden that sinks the brand.

3. The right strategic path: Cycle-resistant new consumer beauty brands have all shifted their focus to strengthening R&D systems, member relationship management and supply chain governance, prioritizing cash flow safety over blind pursuit of short-term sales growth.

The sudden stall of blank me provides clear risk warnings and directional guidance for beauty sellers, matching their focus on shifting market opportunities and risk prevention:

1. Current category shifts: The beauty industry has entered a period of saturated stock competition. Over the past three years, the exit rate for emerging beauty and personal care brands has accelerated sharply: multiple once-popular viral brands including HEDONE, Fomomy and Tria have already ceased operations after bankruptcy. The old growth model that relied solely on influencer seeding and fundraising-backed storytelling is completely obsolete.

2. Core risk warnings: While the base makeup category boasts advantages including high repeat purchase rates and strong user stickiness, it also has high R&D barriers, slow product iteration cycles, and stricter requirements for operational capability. Over-reliance on external marketing spending, lack of organic profitability, and neglect of cash flow management are the core reasons for the collapse of most viral beauty brands, which new market entrants should actively avoid.

3. Opportunities and strategic direction: For current beauty brand operators, sustainable survival through the current industry consolidation wave requires shifting operational focus to boosting repeat purchases, user retention, and profit margins, prioritizing cash flow safety, and strengthening R&D and supply chain capabilities.

The collapse of viral new consumer brands like blank me offers key insights for upstream manufacturers including beauty contract manufacturers and packaging suppliers, aligned with their focus on demand shifts, opportunities and risk management:

1. B2B partnership risk warning: Most viral new consumer brands have weak risk resistance, and will default on large amounts of accounts payable once operations stall. In the blank me case, contract manufacturers and packaging suppliers are among the leading creditors, with many upstream players already suffering losses. Manufacturers need to be wary of bad debt risk tied to over-reliance on a single large client.

2. Shifting market demand: The beauty industry is increasingly prioritizing product quality and R&D stability, especially in categories like base makeup that require strict performance on texture, safety and production consistency. Manufacturers with strong in-house R&D and high-quality production capabilities will gain access to more long-term, stable partnership opportunities.

3. Insights for operational adjustment: When working with new consumer brands, manufacturers should set reasonable payment terms and implement strict risk controls to avoid brand failures dragging down their own cash chains. They should also diversify their client base across multiple different types of stable customers to spread operational risk and improve their own anti-risk capability.

The case of blank me being filed for bankruptcy by its own marketing service provider offers direct, actionable lessons for service providers serving the new consumer sector, aligned with their focus on industry trends, risk management and solution design:

1. Industry development trends: Industry consolidation is accelerating in the new consumer space, and the淘汰 rate of viral brands continues to rise. Service providers should not evaluate clients solely based on their short-term popularity and growth metrics, and need to pay closer attention to the operational health of their client base.

2. Core client pain points: The core weakness of most emerging viral brands is a lack of organic profitability—their growth is fully dependent on external fundraising and paid traffic. Once growth slows and fundraising falls through, brands are unable to pay for marketing, operations and other service fees, leaving many service providers with unpaid bills that can only be recovered through lengthy legal proceedings, resulting in direct losses for the service provider.

3. Risk mitigation strategies: When working with new brands, service providers can optimize their billing models to reduce exposure to risk from long payment terms and client funding advances. They should also adjust their client structure to prioritize clients with healthy operations, stable repeat purchases and solid cash flow, to avoid severe business disruption caused by bad debt from a single large client.

The exit of viral new consumer brands like blank me offers important insights for e-commerce platforms around merchant recruitment and operations, aligned with platforms' core focus on demand, risk and operational governance:

1. Shifting merchant needs: While early-stage new consumer brands relied on platforms for traffic and transaction infrastructure, as the sector enters the brand delivery cycle, merchants increasingly need operational support from platforms to boost user retention and repeat purchases, rather than just focusing on traffic supply.

2. Adjustments for merchant recruitment: Platforms should not evaluate prospective brands solely based on their short-term GMV growth and fundraising background, and need to assess brand operational quality, cash flow health and product repeat purchase rate across multiple dimensions. This helps select brands with true long-term operational capability to reduce overall platform-level operational risk.

3. Operational guidance and risk prevention: Platforms can strengthen operational guidance for new brands, helping them build a business philosophy that prioritizes profit and cash flow safety. They can also implement an early warning system for underperforming brands to intervene in risks early, and protect the interests of suppliers, consumers and other stakeholders.

The blank me incident is a representative case of industry transformation in the second half of China's new consumer movement, offering new insights for industrial research aligned with researchers' focus on industrial trends and business model evaluation:

1. New industrial dynamics: China's new consumer sector has fully transitioned from the first half focused on traffic and growth to the second half centered on brand value delivery. Industry consolidation has accelerated sharply, with multiple top-tier emerging viral brands entering bankruptcy liquidation over the past three years. Market evaluation criteria have shifted completely, from focusing on GMV and growth speed to prioritizing repeat purchase rates, profit margins and cash flow safety.

2. Newly exposed industry flaws: The popular early new consumer growth model—"investor backing + niche positioning + influencer seeding + successive fundraising rounds"—is now obsolete. This model only allows brands to quickly build public awareness, but fails to build genuine brand equity or organic, sustainable profitability. Once traffic costs rise and capital tightens, brands immediately descend into full-blown crisis.

3. Guidance for future research: Going forward, research on new consumer brands should place greater focus on long-term dimensions including operational capability and brand equity accumulation. In the second half of the new consumer era, core competitiveness has returned to sustainable operation capability, rather than one-off viral hit success.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

新消费的债偿周期。

|金雅

曾被视为“国货底妆第一”的网红品牌blank me(半分一),被一纸破产申请推到聚光灯下。

近日,blank me母公司上海永熙信息科技有限公司被申请破产审查及强制清算。《天下网商》查询全国企业破产重组案件信息网发现,案件申请人为其合作供应商——上海博观瑞思传媒科技有限公司。

成立于2016年的blank me,曾是国货美妆供给升级浪潮中的代表品牌,以底妆细分赛道切入市场,曾在电商平台拿下底妆类目国货第一,入选“福布斯中国新锐品牌TOP100”,2023年一度因获得LVMH旗下消费基金路威凯腾投资意向成为行业焦点。

值得提及的一点是,“被申请破产”并不等于企业已经破产,相关程序仍有待法院审查。但这一信号已经说明:一个曾靠精准定位和资本故事快速跃升类目龙头的新消费美妆品牌,如今已经走到了现金流、供应链和品牌信用的压力交汇点。

blank me的困境或许不只是单个品牌的经营失误,更是新消费从讲增长转向算利润的下半场竞争之后,一批网红品牌必须补交的答卷。

造“神”:投资人创立网红品牌,昔日国货第一

blank me的故事,曾是新消费品牌崛起路径中的“投资人下场”样本之一。

2016年,blank me在上海成立。公开资料显示,其创始人杨博雅毕业于同济大学管理科学与工程专业,曾任德同资本投资总监,长期关注美妆护肤和新媒体消费项目,参与过美ONE、自然乐园、Farfetch等项目投资。

创始人的过往经历,让blank me在创业初期就不是简单地“做一款化妆品”,而是以投资人视角重新审视美妆赛道:哪里还有结构性机会,哪里还能长出新品牌。

杨博雅最终选中了底妆。

彼时,国货美妆正处在爆发的窗口期。完美日记、花西子等品牌依靠口红、散粉等彩妆单品迅速出圈,但在粉底液、气垫、妆前乳等底妆品类里,消费者的心智仍主要被雅诗兰黛、兰蔻、阿玛尼等国际品牌占据。底妆对肤感、安全性和研发稳定性要求更高,门槛也更高,因此并非是国货品牌容易突破的品类。

难度高的反面是未被挖掘的机会,blank me正是看中了这一点。

相比更容易被潮流带动的口红、眼影等彩妆,底妆一旦被消费者接受,复购率和用户黏性更强。blank me主打“专业底妆”“适合亚洲肤质”等定位,试图把自己与平价国货彩妆区隔开来。正如创始人杨博雅曾在采访中强调,底妆不是玄学,而应该是“科学”。

找准差异化赛道之后,品牌没有用低价切市场,而是尝试用更精致的视觉、更明确的品类定位,以及更接近国际品牌的表达,去承接年轻消费者对“国货升级”的想象。其2021年推出的新品“骑士粉霜”价格曾突破400元的国货底妆价格“天花板”,高于一些国际大牌的部分底妆产品线。

而真正让blank me销量跑起来的,是内容平台和电商渠道的共振。

种草平台积累口碑,社交每天扩大传播、短视频平台提升曝光,综合电商平台承接交易,再叠加直播电商爆发,blank me赶上了美妆品牌最容易被看见的那几年。它的产品适合被达人反复测评:遮瑕、持妆效果等特性都适合内容化表达。通过大量试色、测评和妆容场景,blank me迅速在年轻女性用户中建立了“国货底妆黑马”的认知。

高光时刻很快到来。2019年上线首款底妆产品后,blank me在主流电商渠道的底妆类目排名快速攀升;2021年、2022年连续拿下平台国货底妆第一。品牌还入选过“福布斯中国新锐品牌TOP100”,一度成为资本眼中最具代表性的国货高端化样本。

那时的blank me,看起来几乎踩中了所有正确答案:精准赛道、内容种草、直播电商、资本故事。但也正是这些答案,后来也成为它失速的伏笔。

失速:从“投资罗生门”,到供应商、代工厂追债

blank me的失速并非突如其来,此次破产申请只是最后“被看见”的结果。

据公开信息,5月25日,上海永熙信息科技有限公司新增破产案件,申请人为上海博观瑞思传媒科技有限公司,后者主要为品牌提供整合营销、电商运营、内容推广等服务——换句话说,把blank me推到破产审查门口的,是曾经帮助它制造声量和流量的服务商。

这也是最让人唏嘘的地方。一个靠内容种草和电商转化跑出来的美妆品牌,最终被营销服务商申请破产,本身就暗示了新消费旧模式的一次反噬。

过去,blank me的增长离不开达人种草、直播间曝光和电商平台成交,当销售放缓、融资不再、现金流承压之后,最先变成债务压力的,也正是这些曾经支撑增长的外部费用。

失速其实早有征兆。blank me官方微博自2024年12月后再未更新,小红书、抖音账号内容停留在2025年3月、4月;品牌的抖音官方账号自2025年8月后再未直播。对一个互联网美妆品牌而言,社媒停更和直播停摆,是预算收缩、组织收缩和经营信心下降的外在表现。

更直接的压力来自司法和债务端。《天下网商》通过企查查查询到,上海永熙近年来已卷入大量纠纷,累计涉及司法案件104个,其中80%的身份为被告,涉案金额达3679万元,案件涉及服务合同纠纷、侵害商标权、买卖合同等类型,原告方包括营销服务商、代工厂、包材商、咨询公司,甚至还包括装修公司。这些现象说明,blank me的问题已经不是某一笔账款逾期,而是经营链条多环节同时承压。

如果倒推品牌失速的关键拐点,或许可以回溯到2024年的一则“投资罗生门”事件。

2023年,有消息传出,LVMH旗下消费基金路威凯腾曾与上海永熙签署投资相关协议,这一度被外界视为blank me高端化叙事获得国际资本认可的重要标志。

但到了2024年,路威凯腾发布声明称,其与上海永熙及相关方不存在股权或任何其他形式的投资关系,并表示因对永熙公司的业务及财务尽职调查结果不满意,以及发现其存在未如实告知的未决法律程序等因素,已于2024年2月解除相关协议。

对新消费品牌而言,融资的价值不只是钱,更在于信用背书。当一个明星品牌原本期待的资本接力未落地,外部市场对其财务透明度、经营质量的信心会同步迅速滑落。

此后,上海永熙被执行、限高、股权冻结等信息陆续出现。2025年开始上海永熙被密集执行限制消费令,累计达28次,杨博雅本人还曾有229.65万元股权被冻结。

回看blank me的下滑路径,早期依靠内容平台、大主播和国货红利快速起量;中期靠融资预期支撑高营销投入和高端化叙事;后期当美妆消费降温、流量成本攀升、资本谨慎,品牌自身造血能力不足的问题开始集中暴露。

blank me选择的底妆赛道,或许也是它“败也萧何”的关键。

底妆品类的优势在于复购和黏性,但劣势在于研发迭代慢、用户体验差异大,产品线不如彩妆快速上新制造的新鲜感。如果品牌不能持续提高复购率和利润率,只靠大促、达人和直播间拉动销量,增长越快,费用和库存压力反而越重。

所以,blank me不是倒在“没人买国货底妆”上,而是倒在一套曾经有效、后来失效的增长模型上。当流量便宜、资本充裕时,营销可以被看作投资;当流量昂贵、融资收紧时,营销就变成了成本。

当品牌还在讲高端化故事,供应商却已经开始追讨账款,故事与账本之间的裂缝,便难以再遮掩。

新消费进入“品牌兑现周期”

如果把blank me放在行业背景下看,它并不是孤例,新锐美妆个护品牌近三年来的出清明显在加速。

2024年以来,红极一时的艺术彩妆品牌HEDONE发表告别书,在两年缺乏新品后宣布停运;造出过“一次性棉签唇釉”的彩妆品牌浮气Fomomy,被近八位数的负债额叫停;拉芳旗下平价彩妆品牌VNK也官宣撤店。2025年,情绪个护品牌三谷、Rever的母公司保利沃利科技进入破产清算程序,这家累计销售额超30亿元的明星企业,也因资不抵债走向破产。

这些品牌有一个共同特点:它们都曾是某个阶段的新消费样本。有的靠设计出圈,有的靠情绪概念突围,有的靠达人和主播成为爆款。但当行业进入存量竞争阶段之后,它们发现自己积累的更多是知名度,而非品牌资产。

这是今天行业最容易被忽略的变化。过去几年,美妆个护行业讨论最多的是获客成本、流量红利和融资环境。但真正决定品牌生死的,越来越不是消费者是否知道你,而是消费者是否会持续选择你。

换句话说,美妆个护行业正在从品牌建设周期进入品牌兑现周期。品牌建设周期,是讲故事的阶段。品牌通过定位、视觉、内容、创始人IP和营销传播建立认知,占领消费者心智。blank me、HEDONE、POLYVOLY都曾是这个阶段的优秀学生。

而品牌兑现周期,则要求品牌把认知转化成复购,把心智转化成利润,把品牌势能转化成现金流。两者看似接近,却是完全不同的能力。

一位长期跟踪国货美妆行业的分析人士曾指出,过去行业普遍关注GMV和增长速度,而如今企业更关注复购率、会员留存、利润率以及用户生命周期价值。市场评价体系已经发生变化:从相信增长可以兑现品牌,到品牌必须证明自己值得被兑现。

事实上,那些依然保持增长的新消费美妆企业,也正在发生相似变化。它们不再把资源过度投入单一爆款,而是强化研发体系、会员运营、供应链管理和长期产品矩阵;不再执着于一次次破圈,而是提高复购率和用户留存;不再追求短期销售额最大化,而是优先保证利润结构和现金流安全。

从结果来看,这些企业的话题度未必最高,但经营质量往往更加稳定。这也是为什么同样经历行业退潮,有的品牌进入司法纠纷和债务危机,有的品牌却能穿越周期。

问题也并非消费者不给新品牌机会——恰恰相反,中国消费者可能是全球最愿意尝试新品的人群之一,而是在商业世界中,重要的不是一次爆发,而是持续经营。从这个角度看,blank me的遭遇或许并不意味着国货美妆的失败,而是行业评价体系改变的又一次印证。

这也是新消费进入下半场后最重要的变化——比起被看见,留下来变得更重要;相较于讲述增长故事,经营能力重新成为决定企业生死的核心变量。

注:文/天下网商,文章来源:天下网商(公众号ID:txws_txws),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:天下网商

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0