广告
加载中

上市不足四年华盛锂电又赴港募资扩产 一年内股价大涨350%股东合计减持1.4亿元

段楠楠 2026-05-21 09:27
段楠楠 2026/05/21 09:27

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文梳理了全球最大电解液添加剂厂商华盛锂电的最新经营、资本动态,核心干货信息如下

1. 业绩股价情况:华盛锂电2022年才在A股科创板上市,受益2025年储能电池爆发,电解液添加剂VC价格暴涨,2026年一季度成功扭亏为盈,扣非净利润达1.16亿元,一年时间股价大涨350%,当前稳定在100元/股左右。

2. 资本动态:上市不满四年,华盛锂电已经向港交所递交招股书赴港募资,计划募投6万吨VC产能、5000吨硅碳负极产能,同时投入资金研发固态电池新材料。

3. 股东动作:股价大涨后,公司前三大相关股东合计已经减持套现1.4亿元,实控人一致行动人还计划减持1%股份,一边高位减持一边向市场融资的行为引发外界对企业前景的质疑。

本文披露了锂电上游电解液添加剂赛道的最新行业趋势与龙头动态,对锂电产业链品牌商的经营布局有参考价值,核心干货如下

1. 消费与行业趋势:2025年全球储能电池市场规模达612.4GWh,同比增长94.6%,带动全球锂电池、电解液出货量分别增长55.6%、43.43%,下游储能需求旺盛拉动VC价格从2025年底的4.5万元/吨涨至2026年4月的15万元/吨,涨幅超2倍,机构预测2026年价格仍将维持坚挺。

2. 产品研发方向:龙头华盛锂电已经布局硅碳负极、固态电池新材料,适配未来新能源电池技术升级方向,给行业内品牌的产品研发指明了方向。

3. 竞争格局:VC生产属于高危化工工艺,环保安全审批严格,新建产能周期超1年,前期行业产能出清后大量中小厂商退出,2026年VC供需比仅107%,头部品牌的市场优势进一步凸显。

本文梳理了储能风口下锂电上游添加剂赛道的最新变化,相关从业者可从中梳理出明确的机会与风险,核心干货如下

1. 需求变化与增长机会:储能电池爆发带动全产业链需求增长,电解液添加剂尤其是VC供需偏紧,价格持续暴涨,2026年行业整体盈利能力将持续复苏,赛道仍有明确的增长空间,相关卖家可围绕头部企业需求布局配套业务。

2. 风险提示:当前港股IPO排队企业超400家,从递表到拿到融资平均耗时超400天,加上产能建设周期,新产能落地需要2-3年,届时VC市场可能再次陷入产能过剩,大规模扩产存在明显的产能消化风险,从业者需要警惕。

3. 可参考的布局方向:头部厂商已经在扩产主流VC产能的同时,提前布局下一代负极材料、固态电池新材料,从业者可跟随头部动作调整自身业务布局,把握新技术红利。

本文披露了电解液添加剂行业的最新供需情况与龙头扩产动态,可为锂电产业链上游生产工厂提供布局参考,核心干货如下

1. 生产端商业机会:VC生产属于高危化工工艺,环保安全审批严格,新建产能周期长达1年以上,前期行业产能过剩阶段已经出清大量中小产能,当前实际有效产能远低于名义产能,2026年VC有效供给约11万吨,供需比仅107%,供给整体偏紧,给现有生产工厂带来了盈利增长机会。

2. 生产需求方向:下游储能对VC需求旺盛,龙头华盛锂电现有产能已经满产满销,计划新增6万吨VC产能,同时布局5000吨硅碳负极产能,提前研发固态电池新材料,给配套生产工厂、原材料供应商指明了需求方向。

3. 扩产风险提示:扩产整体周期较长,产能落地后行业供需可能发生反转,工厂需要避免盲目跟风扩产,合理把握扩产节奏。

本文梳理了当前锂电上游电解液添加剂行业的最新发展情况,可为锂电产业链相关服务商提供业务参考,核心干货如下

1. 行业发展趋势:储能电池爆发带动电解液添加剂行业快速复苏,VC价格短时间内涨幅超2倍,行业盈利能力快速回升,头部企业有强烈的大规模扩产需求,同时开始提前布局下一代电池新材料赛道,行业整体处于复苏上升期。

2. 客户核心痛点:龙头企业现有产能无法满足下游旺盛需求,急需募资扩产,但当前港股IPO排队周期长,拿到融资到投产需要数年时间,很可能错过当前行业红利期;此外VC生产的环保安全要求高,新建产能审批难、周期长,很多企业缺乏相关经验。

3. 服务商业务机会:可针对企业需求提供融资对接服务,帮助企业缩短融资周期,还可提供合规咨询服务,帮助企业加快环保安全审批流程,助力企业抢占扩产的时间窗口。

本文围绕锂电上游龙头华盛锂电赴港上市扩产的动态,对新能源相关资本市场平台的运营布局有参考价值,核心干货如下

1. 企业对平台的核心需求:当前锂电赛道复苏后,头部企业产能不足,有强烈的募资扩产需求,已经在A股上市的优质龙头企业,也会选择赴港二次上市募资,借助平台融资能力满足扩产需求,平台有充足的项目来源。

2. 当前平台存在的问题:目前港股等待IPO企业超400家,从首次递表到正式上市拿到融资平均时长超400天,上市周期过长,无法满足新能源企业快速扩产、抢行业红利的需求,平台可考虑优化审核流程,提升审核效率。

3. 平台招商运营机会:当前新能源上游赛道处于复苏阶段,大量优质企业有融资扩产需求,平台可针对性开拓锂电产业链优质企业资源,吸引符合要求的企业上市,丰富平台新能源赛道的企业资源,提升平台在新能源领域的影响力。

本文披露了锂电上游电解液添加剂行业的最新动向与产业新问题,可为产业研究者提供一手研究素材,核心干货如下

1. 产业新动向:储能市场爆发带动锂电全产业链复苏,电解液添加剂行业供需格局快速反转,价格从低谷快速上涨,行业盈利能力快速回升;头部企业在A股上市获得超募资金后,仍选择赴港二次上市募资扩产,同时提前布局硅碳负极、固态电池新材料,卡位下一代电池技术方向。

2. 产业新问题:当前行业出现了头部上市企业一边股东在股价高位大额减持套现,一边向资本市场募资扩产的情况,引发外界对股东是否长期看好企业发展的质疑;此外港股IPO排队周期过长,无法适配新能源行业快速变化的扩产需求,大规模新产能投产后很可能面临产能过剩的风险。

3. 商业模式层面:已经A股上市的新能源企业,通过赴港二次上市募资扩产做大做强的模式,成为新能源企业绑定赛道增长的新路径,值得研究者深入探讨。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines the latest operating and capital developments of Huasheng New Energy Technology, the world's largest electrolyte additive manufacturer. Key takeaways are as follows

1. Financial performance and share price: Huasheng listed on the Shanghai STAR Market only in 2022. Benefiting from the boom in energy storage batteries in 2025 and the sharp surge in the price of the electrolyte additive VC, the company returned to profitability in Q1 2026 with a non-GAAP net profit of RMB 116 million. Its share price has jumped 350% in one year and currently stabilizes around RMB 100 per share.

2. Capital developments: Less than four years after its IPO, Huasheng has submitted a prospectus to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange to raise funds. It plans to use the proceeds to build 60,000 tons of new VC capacity, 5,000 tons of silicon-carbon anode capacity, and fund R&D into new materials for solid-state batteries.

3. Shareholder actions: Following the share price rally, the company's top three related shareholders have collectively cashed out RMB 140 million via share reductions, and parties acting in concert with the actual controller plan to sell an additional 1% stake. This combination of high-position share selling and new market fundraising has sparked external questions over the company's prospects.

This article outlines the latest industry trends and leading player developments in the upstream lithium battery electrolyte additive track, offering reference for the layout and operations of lithium-ion supply chain brands. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Consumption and industry trends: Global energy storage battery market capacity reached 612.4GWh in 2025, up 94.6% year-on-year, driving 55.6% growth in global lithium battery shipments and 43.43% growth in electrolyte shipments. Booming downstream energy storage demand pushed up VC prices from RMB 45,000 per ton at the end of 2025 to RMB 150,000 per ton in April 2026, a gain of more than 200%. Institutions forecast prices will remain strong through 2026.

2. Product R&D directions: Industry leader Huasheng has already laid out capacity for silicon-carbon anodes and new solid-state battery materials, aligning with future new energy battery technology upgrades and providing a directional reference for product R&D for industry brands.

3. Competitive landscape: VC production is a high-risk chemical process with strict environmental and safety approval requirements. New capacity construction takes more than one year to complete. Following earlier industry capacity consolidation that drove many small and mid-sized players out of the market, the 2026 VC supply-demand ratio stands at only 107%, further strengthening the market position of leading brands.

This article summarizes the latest shifts in the upstream lithium battery additive track amid the energy storage boom, helping industry participants identify clear opportunities and risks. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Demand shifts and growth opportunities: The energy storage battery boom has lifted demand across the supply chain. Supply of electrolyte additives, particularly VC, remains tight and prices have continued to surge. The overall industry profitability will keep recovering in 2026, and the track still has clear room for growth. Relevant sellers can layout supporting businesses aligned with the demand of leading industry players.

2. Risk warnings: Currently, more than 400 companies are queuing for IPOs in Hong Kong, with an average waiting time of more than 400 days from submission to funding. Combined with capacity construction timelines, new capacity will take 2-3 years to come online, by which point the VC market could face overcapacity again. Large-scale expansion carries clear capacity digestion risk, which industry participants should watch for.

3. Reference layout directions: Leading players are expanding mainstream VC capacity while pre-positioning for next-generation anode materials and new solid-state battery materials. Industry participants can adjust their business layout to align with leading players' moves to capture new technology dividends.

This article discloses the latest supply-demand conditions and leading player expansion dynamics in the electrolyte additive industry, providing layout reference for upstream production factories in the lithium battery supply chain. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Production-side business opportunities: VC production is a high-risk chemical process with strict environmental and safety approval requirements. New capacity takes more than one year to build. Earlier industry overcapacity already forced out a large amount of small and mid-sized capacity, and current actual effective capacity is far lower than nominal capacity. Effective VC supply will reach around 110,000 tons in 2026, with a supply-demand ratio of just 107%, leaving overall supply tight. This creates profit growth opportunities for existing production factories.

2. Production demand directions: Downstream energy storage has generated strong demand for VC, and industry leader Huasheng is already operating at full capacity. It plans to add 60,000 tons of VC capacity, build 5,000 tons of silicon-carbon anode capacity, and conduct pre-R&D on new solid-state battery materials, clarifying demand directions for supporting production factories and raw material suppliers.

3. Expansion risk warnings: The overall expansion cycle is long, and industry supply and demand may reverse after new capacity comes online. Factories should avoid blind follow-the-leader expansion and control expansion pace reasonably.

This article summarizes the latest developments in the upstream lithium battery electrolyte additive industry, providing business reference for relevant service providers in the lithium battery supply chain. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: The energy storage boom has driven a rapid recovery of the electrolyte additive industry. VC prices have surged more than 200% in a short period, industry profitability has rebounded quickly, and leading players have strong demand for large-scale capacity expansion. They are also pre-positioning in next-generation battery new material tracks, putting the overall industry in a recovery and growth phase.

2. Core client pain points: The existing capacity of leading players cannot meet strong downstream demand, and they urgently need to raise capital for expansion. However, long IPO queuing times in Hong Kong mean it will take years from fundraising to production, making it very likely that companies will miss the current industry dividend window. In addition, VC production has strict environmental and safety requirements, so new capacity approval is difficult and time-consuming, and many companies lack relevant experience.

3. Business opportunities for service providers: Service providers can offer financing matching services to help companies shorten fundraising timelines, and provide compliance consulting to help speed up environmental and safety approval processes, helping companies seize the time window for capacity expansion.

This article analyzes the capital raising and expansion move by leading upstream lithium battery player Huasheng to list in Hong Kong, offering reference for the operation and layout of new energy-focused capital market platforms. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core corporate demand for platforms: After the lithium battery track's recovery, leading players face capacity shortages and have strong demand to raise funds for expansion. Even quality leading players already listed on the A-share market are choosing to pursue a secondary listing in Hong Kong to leverage the platform's financing capacity to meet expansion needs, giving platforms a sufficient pipeline of high-quality projects.

2. Existing platform issues: Currently more than 400 companies are waiting for IPO approval in Hong Kong, with an average of more than 400 days from initial prospectus submission to listing and funding. The overly long listing cycle cannot meet the needs of new energy companies to expand quickly and capture industry dividends. Platforms could consider optimizing their review processes and improving approval efficiency.

3. Platform business development and operation opportunities: The upstream new energy track is currently in a recovery phase, with a large number of high-quality companies seeking capital for expansion. Platforms can proactively source high-quality enterprises along the lithium battery supply chain, attract eligible companies to list, enrich their pool of new energy track companies, and boost the platform's influence in the new energy sector.

This article discloses the latest developments and emerging industry issues in the upstream lithium battery electrolyte additive sector, providing first-hand research material for industry researchers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New industry developments: The energy storage market boom has driven a recovery across the lithium battery supply chain, rapidly reversing the supply-demand landscape in the electrolyte additive industry, pushing prices up quickly from their trough and lifting industry profitability rapidly. After raising oversubscribed capital in their A-share IPO, leading industry players are still pursuing secondary listings in Hong Kong to fund expansion while pre-positioning in silicon-carbon anodes and new solid-state battery materials to secure a position in next-generation battery technology.

2. New industry issues: The industry has seen a recent trend where leading listed companies see shareholders cash out large positions at peak share prices even as the company seeks new capital from the market for expansion, sparking questions over whether shareholders are truly bullish on the company's long-term prospects. In addition, the long Hong Kong IPO queuing cycle cannot match the fast-changing expansion needs of the new energy sector, and large-scale new capacity is likely to face overcapacity risks once commissioned.

3. Business model implications: The model where A-share-listed new energy companies pursue secondary listings in Hong Kong to raise funds for expansion and scale up has emerged as a new path for new energy enterprises to tie their growth to the sector's boom, which deserves further in-depth research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

5月12日,华盛锂电发布控股股东减持最新进展,公司实际控制人及控股股东因减持触及5%整数倍而触发提示公告。

此前,华盛锂电实际控制人及其一致行动人计划减持公司1%股份。截至5月12日,实际控制人及其一致行动人已经减持17.90万股,持股比例从25.11%下降至25%。

由于储能电池出货量大增,产业链企业业绩持续复苏,在此带动下公司股价大幅上涨。在股价大涨的背景下,实控人及其一致行动人抛出了减持计划。

除此之外,在业绩复苏及股价大涨的情形下,华盛锂电计划赴港上市募资扩产。但在港股等待IPO企业超400家的背景下,华盛锂电能否如愿登陆港股?

01 VC价格回暖,一季度扭亏为盈

2025年下半年得益于储能电池的爆发,锂电池产业链全线复苏,产品销量大增,产品价格也在持续上涨。

国际能源机构及灼识咨询发布的数据显示,2025年全球储能电池市场规模达612.4GWh,同比增长94.60%。在储能电池爆发带动下,2025年全球锂电池出货量达2257GWh,同比增长55.60%。

在锂电池出货量大增的背景下,作为锂电池四大核心材料的电解液出货量大增。2025年全球电解液出货量为201.8万吨,同比增长43.43%。

招股书显示,华盛锂电是全球最大的电解液添加剂提供商,全球市场份额高达15.2%。

按分子结构及用途不同,华盛锂电旗下电解液添加剂分为VC(碳酸亚乙烯酯)和FEC(氟代碳酸乙烯酯)两类。其中VC更适合磷酸铁锂电池,FEC更适合三元电池。

得益于电解液销量的提升,公司添加剂销量也在持续提升。2025年华盛锂电VC销量为1.25万吨、FEC销量为7952.1吨,销售价格分别为4.65万元/吨、2.98万元/吨。其中VC销售价格同比增长9.15%。

在销量持续上升的背景下,2025年公司VC、FEC及其他产品销量收入为8.69亿元,同比增长72.21%。虽然销量及VC价格有所复苏,但依然未能实现经营上的扭亏为盈,2025年华盛锂电扣非后利润依旧亏损5459.43万元。

由于储能电池销售持续火热,电解液添加剂价格持续上升。相关行业数据显示,VC添加剂价格从2025年底的约4.5万元/吨飙升至2026年4月均价15万元/吨,涨幅超2倍。

在此带动下,2026一季度华盛锂电业绩大爆发。一季报显示,2026年一季度华盛锂电实现营业收入3.27亿元,同比增长96.83%,实现扣非后净利润1.16亿元,2025年一季度公司则亏损4426.91万元。

根据中信建投研报预测,电解液添加剂VC生产涉及氯化、氟化反应等高危化工工艺,环保及安全审批严格,新建产能周期长达1年以上。

过去几年,由于行业产能大幅过剩,不少中小厂商停产退出,行业实际有效产能远低于名义产能。中信建投预测,2026年VC环节有效供给约11万吨,供需比约107%。

因此,在下游储能电池需求仍旺盛的背景下,2026年电解液添加剂价格依旧坚挺,华盛锂电在2026年盈利能力大概率持续复苏。

02 上市不到四年又要赴港融资,产品满产满销亟待扩产

在行业持续复苏及股价持续大涨的背景下,华盛锂电计划赴港上市募资。4月15日,华盛锂电向联交所递交招股书,计划赴港上市。

此次赴港上市,华盛锂电计划募资投建6万吨VC产能,该项目总投资9.5亿元,公司还计划募资实现负极材料的产业化,以便形成5000吨硅碳负极材料年产能。此外,华盛锂电还计划研发固态电池新材料及补充营运资金。

值得注意的是,华盛锂电在A股科创板上市并没有多久。2022年7月13日,华盛锂电便以98.35元/股发行2800万股,公司募资了27.54亿元,扣除发行费用公司募资净额为25.67亿元。

原计划华盛锂电募资7亿元,其中6.74亿元用于年产6000吨VC、3000吨FEC项目,2650万元用于研发中心建设项目。

彼时,由于新能源备受投资者追捧,扣除发行费用华盛锂电实际超募18.67亿元。此后,华盛锂电先后数次公告将大部分超募资金用于补充流动性。

在获得如此庞大的补流资金后,华盛锂电自身流动性十分充裕。截至2025年12月31日,华盛锂电在手货币资金为5.55亿元,此外公司还有5.55亿元交易性金融资产。

同期,公司仅有3.5亿元有息负债,且3.33亿元是长期负债,这也意味着华盛锂电短期内并无太大的偿债压力。截至2025年12月31日,华盛锂电资产负债率仅为19.54%,作为对比电解液龙头天赐材料资产负债率为33.02%。

由于货币资金充足,华盛锂电通过现金管理获得了较多的利息和投资收益。2025年,公司处理交易性金融资产便获得近2000万元的投资收益。

有意思的是,在A股上市后很长一段时间公司股价走势并不理想,2024年9月公司股价一度跌至15元/股以下,较发行价大幅度破发,直到2025年底公司股价才重回发行价以上。

由于锂电产业链复苏,加之资本市场持续回暖,目前华盛锂电股价仍在100元/股左右。从公司自身角度而言,此时赴港上市募资无疑是较为合适的时机。

但是否有必要通过港股募资的方式来进行扩产还有待商榷。目前,公司VC和FEC的设计产能分别为1.3万吨、7500吨,2025年由于下游需求旺盛,华盛锂电旗下产品几乎满产满销。

目前,电解液出货量持续上升,公司未来VC、FEC销量仍将上升,华盛锂电现有产能很难满足未来市场需要。

但由于港股目前等待排队企业超400家,港股上市时间变长,目前港股从首次递表到正式上市拿到融资平均时长超400天。拿到融资建基地投产及产能提升又需要一至两年,届时VC市场是否又会陷入产能过剩犹未可知。

且此次华盛锂电整体建设产能较大,仅VC便计划建设6万吨,目前公司整体产能仅为1.3万吨,建成后市场能否充分消化如此规模的产能有待观察。

针对华盛锂电赴港上市扩产一事,「创业最前线」试图向华盛锂电了解相关情况,截至发稿,未获得华盛锂电回应。

03 股价一年大涨350%,前三大股东合计减持1.4亿元

一边是公司计划赴港募资,一边华盛锂电实控人又趁着股价大涨之际减持套现。

公开资料显示,华盛锂电成立于1997年,由沈锦良牵头22名职工,以股份合作制形式成立张家港市华盛纺织助剂厂,主营传统化工产品。

20世纪初,其引进锂电池电解液添加剂生产线,切入新能源赛道,开始生产碳酸亚乙烯酯(VC)等产品。

经过多年发展,华盛锂电经营规模持续扩大,公司也将目光投向了资本市场。在上市前夕,沈锦良、沈鸣父子与多人签订一致行动人协议成为华盛锂电实控人。

2022年7月,华盛锂电正式在上交所科创板上市。2026年1月,华盛锂电实控人及其一致行动人持有股份迎来解禁。

2026年4月,解禁3个月后,华盛锂电实控人的一致行动人沈刚、袁洋、袁玄、张雪梅及华赢二号、华赢三号拟通过集中竞价方式减持公司股份,合计拟减持不超过159.5万股,占公司总股本比例不超过1%。

此前,因为VC价格持续复苏、加之资本市场回暖,华盛锂电股价接连大涨。2025年5月,公司股价一直在20至25元每股徘徊,2025年11月公司股价一度最高涨至155元/股。近期虽然公司股价有所回落,但依旧在100元/股左右,1年时间涨幅超350%。

在股价持续大涨的背景下,公司实际控制人的众多一致行动人计划减持公司股份。若顶格减持,1%的股权对应金额超1.6亿元,若顺利减持该笔减持也能让众多一致行动人挣得盆满钵满。

不只是公司实控人的一致行动人减持,此前公司单一大股东张家港金农联实业有限公司的一致行动人张家港东金实业有限公司(以下简称“东金实业”)曾在2025年8月8日-2025年11月7日减持了158.5万股,减持总金额为5688.75万元。

此外,华盛锂电另一大股东苏州敦行聚才创业投资合伙企业(有限合伙)也曾在2025年11月25日至2025年11月28日减持59.45万股,减持总金额为6184.15万元。近两年,以上股东合计减持金额约1.4亿元。

一边是实控人的一致行动人及众多股东在资本市场上减持套现,一边公司又计划赴港向资本市场要钱。虽然减持是股东的行为,赴港上市也合规,但边高位减持、边向资本市场融资的行为也让外界怀疑股东是否看好公司未来的发展。

对此,「创业最前线」试图向华盛锂电了解股东减持情况,截至发稿,未获得华盛锂电回应。

对于华盛锂电而言,在储能电池装机持续火热且VC供给相对偏紧的背景下,电解液添加剂价格将持续回暖,2026年公司经营业绩将大幅增长。在此背景下,华盛锂电也计划赴港募资扩充6万吨VC产能,该产能是目前公司已有产能的4倍以上。

但鉴于港股整体上市时间较长,华盛锂电能否尽快通过聆讯,在行业供需相对平衡的情形下,顺利拿到融资尽快投产,「创业最前线」将持续关注。

注:文/段楠楠,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:创业最前线

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0