广告
加载中

一根没量产的绳子 让股价翻倍了

王满华 2026-11-02 11:41
王满华 2026/11/02 11:41

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

总:这轮行情最关键的干货是股价暴涨由概念驱动,而非业绩改善。

1. 10月16日至30日,大业股份11个交易日从9.01元涨到19.52元,涨幅116.65%,市值增至66.71亿元。

2. 触发因素是此前设立机器人子公司,并与北邮签署人形机器人腱绳材料与感知功能开发协议,市场贴上人形机器人概念标签。

3. 公司明确腱绳仅处客户送样验证阶段,尚未量产,也未产生实质性收益,财报中甚至未出现腱绳二字。

总:实操上要警惕概念炒作和基本面反差。

1. 2026年上半年营收24.63亿元,同比下降2.31%,归母净利润亏损6399.14万元;三季度亏损进一步扩大。

2. 上交所下发监管工作函,公司多次提示换手率大幅抬升、多空分歧大、短期回调和非理性炒作风险。

3. 对普通投资者而言,应先看公告、量产进度和真实收入,不能只看概念标签和短期涨幅。

总:文章虽以股价异动为主线,但品牌商可从中看到技术叙事、客户资源和产品研发的启示。

1. 大业股份是全球领先胎圈钢丝企业,2025年国内市占率36.23%,客户覆盖米其林、普利司通、固特异、中策橡胶、玲珑轮胎等,说明强势客户资源和细分市场地位仍是品牌资产。

2. 公司因设立机器人子公司并与北邮围绕人形机器人腱绳材料与感知功能合作,被市场贴上人形机器人概念标签;这提示品牌商,前沿技术叙事能快速提升关注度,但必须以真实研发和量产为支撑。

总:产品研发和价格竞争层面,核心是避免讲故事替代经营。

1. 灵巧手传动有连杆、齿轮和腱绳三条路线,腱绳材料是受关注方向,但大业股份相关产品仍在送样验证,未量产、未收益。

2. 其97.56%营收仍来自钢帘线、胎圈钢丝和胶管钢丝,传统业务面临下游强势、原材料波动和毛利率挤压。

3. 品牌商应关注技术概念如何转化为产品卖点、客户认证和可持续收入,而不是只追逐热点标签。

总:对大业股份这类标的,卖家最需读懂的是政策监管信号、概念市场机会和风险提示。

1. 机会来自人形机器人板块整体走强,10月16日行情启动后,襄阳轴承同期接近翻倍,宇树科技、凡拓数创、安培龙、海天瑞声等涨幅超过50%,显示热点题材有短期资金聚集效应。

2. 大业股份因腱绳材料开发协议被贴上概念标签,但公司公告明确产品仅处客户送样验证阶段,尚未量产、未产生实质性收益,属于典型的概念先行、业绩未兑现。

总:事件应对上要重视监管和基本面风险。

1. 上交所在10月22日下发监管工作函,公司连发三封异常波动公告和风险提示,提到换手率大幅抬升、多空分歧大、短期回调及非理性炒作。

2. 上半年归母净利润亏损6399.14万元,三季度亏损由1902万元扩大至5221万元,扣非亏损由2542万元扩大至5966万元。

3. 可学习点是:关注真实订单、量产节点和客户验证,而非仅看协议和标签;对未量产概念应设置风险边界。

总:对工厂而言,文章的干货集中在产品研发需求、送样验证流程和上游零部件商业机会。

1. 人形机器人灵巧手需要完成抓、捏、拧、转等精细动作,传动方案主要有连杆、齿轮和腱绳三条路线,腱绳材料与感知功能成为研发方向。

2. 大业股份与北邮签署人形机器人腱绳材料与感知功能开发服务协议,但该产品仅处于客户送样验证阶段,尚未量产,也未产生实质性收益。

总:工厂可从传统制造企业的转型与风险控制中得到启示。

1. 大业股份主营胎圈钢丝、钢帘线和胶管钢丝,三项业务占营收97.56%,说明新业务尚不能替代基本盘。

2. 上游核心零部件被投资人视为刚需,且应用范围更广,可服务人形机器人、消费电子、医疗设备、汽车电子等场景。

3. 工厂推进新品时应重视材料研发、客户认证、送样验证、量产条件和真实收入,避免把概念合作误当量产订单。

总:服务商应重点关注具身智能行业趋势、客户痛点和可落地的解决方案。

1. 二级市场因人形机器人概念出现翻倍行情,大业股份11个交易日上涨116.65%,但一级市场对具身智能态度明显冷静,出现投资人暂不投具身智能的论调。

2. 客户痛点是概念热、量产难、收益未兑现;大业股份腱绳业务仍在送样验证,未量产、未收益,财报也未体现腱绳收入。

总:解决方案方向是聚焦上游核心零部件和基础设施。

1. 投资人B提出,无论哪家本体厂商胜出,零部件都是刚需,越上游应用范围越广,不易受单一赛道退潮影响。

2. 触觉传感器等核心零部件可用于人形机器人、消费电子、医疗设备、汽车电子,成熟技术公司已有稳定客户和收入,可形成财务安全垫。

3. 大米创投艾民提到放慢具身智能投资节奏,重点布局数据库这类卖铲子基础设施和具身大脑;吴世春表示梅花创投优先投资上游核心零部件。

总:本文未直接讲平台运营,但平台商可从热点概念、监管信号和产业上游机会中获得风险规避与招商启示。

1. 热点概念能在短期内聚集资金和关注,大业股份11个交易日涨116.65%,襄阳轴承同期接近翻倍,宇树科技、凡拓数创、安培龙、海天瑞声等涨超50%,说明题材流量效应强。

2. 但这类流量伴随非理性炒作风险,上交所在10月22日下发监管工作函,公司多次提示换手率大幅抬升、多空分歧大和短期回调风险。

总:平台商应把真实产业价值作为运营和招商的判断标准。

1. 大业股份腱绳业务仅送样验证,未量产、未收益,97.56%营收仍来自传统钢丝业务,提示平台招商不能只看概念标签。

2. 一级市场更关注上游核心零部件、数据库基础设施和具身大脑,平台可据此识别长期刚需环节。

3. 运营管理上应建立热点预警、公告核查和风险提示机制,避免把短期情绪当成可持续交易或合作机会。

总:文章提供了观察人形机器人概念股和具身智能投资分化的新案例。

1. 二级市场出现脱离基本面的概念炒作:大业股份11个交易日涨116.65%,但其2026年上半年营收24.63亿元、同比下降2.31%,归母净利润亏损6399.14万元,三季度亏损进一步扩大。

2. 上涨由一份人形机器人腱绳材料与感知功能开发协议触发,产品尚未量产、未产生实质性收益,财报中未出现腱绳收入。

总:产业新动向和商业模式启示集中在灵巧手传动与上游核心零部件。

1. 灵巧手传动存在连杆、齿轮、腱绳三条路线,腱绳材料是技术关注点。

2. 一级市场对具身智能投资降温,但长期确定性仍在,投资人更聚焦上游核心零部件、数据库基础设施和具身大脑;逻辑是本体厂商无论谁胜出,零部件都是刚需。

3. 监管层面,交易所发函和公司风险提示表明,对概念炒作需强化信息披露和风险揭示;研究上应区分协议、送样、量产和收入四个阶段。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

Overall: The most important takeaway from this rally is that the share-price surge was driven by a concept, not by improving fundamentals.

1. From October 16 to 30, Daye Co. rose from RMB 9.01 to RMB 19.52 over 11 trading days, a gain of 116.65%, lifting its market capitalization to RMB 6.671 billion.

2. The trigger was its earlier establishment of a robotics subsidiary and a humanoid-robot tendon-rope material and sensing-function development agreement with Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, which led the market to label it as a humanoid-robot concept stock.

3. The company explicitly stated that its tendon rope is only at the customer sample-validation stage, has not been mass-produced, and has generated no material revenue; the term tendon rope does not even appear in its financial reports.

Overall: In practice, investors should be wary of concept hype and the contrast with fundamentals.

1. In H1 2026, revenue was RMB 2.463 billion, down 2.31% year on year, and net profit attributable to shareholders was a loss of RMB 63.9914 million; the loss widened further in Q3.

2. The Shanghai Stock Exchange issued a regulatory work letter, and the company repeatedly warned of a sharp rise in turnover, large divergence between bulls and bears, short-term pullback risk, and irrational speculation.

3. For ordinary investors, the priority should be announcements, mass-production progress, and real revenue, not concept labels and short-term gains.

Overall: Although the article centers on share-price volatility, brand owners can draw lessons about technology narratives, customer resources, and product R&D.

1. Daye Co. is a leading global maker of bead wire, with a 36.23% domestic market share in 2025; its customers include Michelin, Bridgestone, Goodyear, Zhongce Rubber, and Linglong Tire, showing that strong customer resources and niche market position remain brand assets.

2. By establishing a robotics subsidiary and cooperating with BUPT on humanoid-robot tendon-rope materials and sensing functions, the company was labeled a humanoid-robot concept stock. This suggests that cutting-edge technology narratives can quickly raise attention, but they must be backed by real R&D and mass production.

Overall: In product R&D and price competition, the key is to avoid letting storytelling replace operations.

1. Dexterous-hand transmission has three routes: linkage, gear, and tendon rope. Tendon-rope materials are a focus area, but Daye Co.'s related product is still in sample validation, with no mass production or revenue.

2. Of its revenue, 97.56% still comes from steel cord, bead wire, and hose wire; the traditional business faces strong downstream customers, raw-material volatility, and gross-margin pressure.

3. Brand owners should focus on how technology concepts translate into product selling points, customer certification, and sustainable revenue, rather than merely chasing hot labels.

Overall: For sellers evaluating a target like Daye Co., the most important things to understand are regulatory signals, concept-market opportunities, and risk warnings.

1. The opportunity came from the overall strength of the humanoid-robot sector. After the rally started on October 16, Xiangyang Bearing nearly doubled over the same period, while Unitree Robotics, Fantu Shuchuang, Anpeilong, and Haitian Ruisheng gained more than 50%, showing the short-term capital concentration effect of hot themes.

2. Daye Co. was labeled with a concept tag due to its tendon-rope material development agreement, but the company's announcement made clear that the product is only at the customer sample-validation stage, not yet mass-produced, and has generated no material revenue—a typical case of concept first and earnings not yet delivered.

Overall: In responding to the event, attention must be paid to regulatory and fundamental risks.

1. The Shanghai Stock Exchange issued a regulatory work letter on October 22, and the company issued three announcements on abnormal volatility and risk warnings, citing a sharp rise in turnover, large bull-bear divergence, short-term pullback, and irrational speculation.

2. H1 net profit attributable to shareholders was a loss of RMB 63.9914 million; the Q3 loss widened from RMB 19.02 million to RMB 52.21 million, and the non-recurring loss widened from RMB 25.42 million to RMB 59.66 million.

3. The lesson is to watch real orders, mass-production milestones, and customer validation rather than only agreements and labels; set risk boundaries for unproven concepts.

Overall: For factories, the key takeaways are product R&D demand, the sample-validation process, and commercial opportunities in upstream components.

1. Humanoid-robot dexterous hands need to perform fine actions such as grasping, pinching, twisting, and rotating. Transmission solutions mainly include linkage, gear, and tendon rope, and tendon-rope materials and sensing functions have become R&D directions.

2. Daye Co. signed a humanoid-robot tendon-rope material and sensing-function development service agreement with BUPT, but the product is only at the customer sample-validation stage, not yet mass-produced, and has generated no material revenue.

Overall: Factories can learn from the transformation and risk control of traditional manufacturers.

1. Daye Co.'s main businesses are bead wire, steel cord, and hose wire, which account for 97.56% of revenue, showing that new businesses cannot yet replace the core base.

2. Upstream core components are seen by investors as essential demand and have broader applications, serving humanoid robots, consumer electronics, medical equipment, automotive electronics, and other scenarios.

3. When pushing new products, factories should focus on material R&D, customer certification, sample validation, mass-production conditions, and real revenue, and avoid mistaking concept cooperation for mass-production orders.

Overall: Service providers should focus on embodied-intelligence industry trends, customer pain points, and implementable solutions.

1. The secondary market saw doubling rallies on the humanoid-robot concept, with Daye Co. up 116.65% over 11 trading days, but the primary market is clearly more cautious on embodied intelligence, with some investors saying they are not investing in it for now.

2. Customer pain points are hot concepts, difficult mass production, and unrealized revenue; Daye Co.'s tendon-rope business is still in sample validation, with no mass production or revenue, and its financial reports do not reflect tendon-rope income.

Overall: The solution direction is to focus on upstream core components and infrastructure.

1. Investor B argued that no matter which robot-body manufacturer wins, components are essential demand; the further upstream, the broader the application range, making them less vulnerable to a single sector's downturn.

2. Core components such as tactile sensors can be used in humanoid robots, consumer electronics, medical equipment, and automotive electronics; mature technology companies already have stable customers and revenue, providing a financial safety cushion.

3. Ai Min of Dami Ventures mentioned slowing the pace of embodied-intelligence investment and focusing on picks-and-shovels infrastructure such as databases and embodied brains; Wu Shichun said Meihua Ventures prioritizes upstream core components.

Overall: This article does not directly discuss platform operations, but marketplace sellers can draw risk-avoidance and merchant-acquisition lessons from hot concepts, regulatory signals, and upstream industry opportunities.

1. Hot concepts can concentrate capital and attention in the short term. Daye Co. rose 116.65% over 11 trading days, Xiangyang Bearing nearly doubled over the same period, and Unitree Robotics, Fantu Shuchuang, Anpeilong, and Haitian Ruisheng gained more than 50%, showing the strong traffic effect of thematic investing.

2. But such traffic comes with irrational-speculation risk. The Shanghai Stock Exchange issued a regulatory work letter on October 22, and the company repeatedly warned of a sharp rise in turnover, large bull-bear divergence, and short-term pullback risk.

Overall: Marketplace sellers should use real industrial value as the criterion for operations and merchant acquisition.

1. Daye Co.'s tendon-rope business is only in sample validation, with no mass production or revenue, and 97.56% of revenue still comes from traditional wire businesses, suggesting that platform merchant acquisition cannot rely only on concept labels.

2. The primary market is more focused on upstream core components, database infrastructure, and embodied brains, which platforms can use to identify long-term essential links.

3. In operations management, platforms should establish mechanisms for hot-topic alerts, announcement verification, and risk warnings, and avoid treating short-term sentiment as sustainable trading or partnership opportunities.

Overall: The article provides a new case for observing humanoid-robot concept stocks and the divergence in embodied-intelligence investment.

1. The secondary market showed concept speculation detached from fundamentals: Daye Co. rose 116.65% over 11 trading days, but its H1 2026 revenue was RMB 2.463 billion, down 2.31% year on year, and net profit attributable to shareholders was a loss of RMB 63.9914 million; the Q3 loss widened further.

2. The rise was triggered by an agreement to develop humanoid-robot tendon-rope materials and sensing functions; the product has not been mass-produced and has generated no material revenue, and tendon-rope income does not appear in the financial reports.

Overall: New industry developments and business-model implications center on dexterous-hand transmission and upstream core components.

1. Dexterous-hand transmission has three routes—linkage, gear, and tendon rope—and tendon-rope materials are a technical focus.

2. Primary-market investment in embodied intelligence has cooled, but long-term certainty remains. Investors are more focused on upstream core components, database infrastructure, and embodied brains; the logic is that no matter which robot-body manufacturer wins, components are essential demand.

3. On the regulatory side, the exchange's letter and the company's risk warnings show that concept speculation requires stronger information disclosure and risk disclosure; in research, one should distinguish four stages: agreement, sample validation, mass production, and revenue.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

一家传统制造企业,成了10月A股最“疯狂”的股票。

“好消息:越亏越少了;坏消息:本金也越来越少了。”这句调侃,成了过去一个月大A投资者的真实写照。

10月30日,A股以一根阴线收官,全月超过4500只个股月线收阴,个股涨跌幅中位数跌超12%。然而,惨淡之中也有例外,那就是大业股份——10月16日至30日仅11个交易日,其股价从9.01元冲到19.52元,涨幅高达116.65%。

但与股价形成鲜明反差的,是公司的业绩表现。财报显示,2026年上半年,大业股份的营业收入为24.63亿元,同比下降2.31%;归母净利润-6399.14万元,同比下降250.93%。

业绩承压,股价却逆势狂飙,这场脱离基本面的上涨,源于其子公司在2025年签署的一份关于“人形机器人腱绳材料”的开发协议,市场就此给大业股份贴上了“人形机器人概念股”的标签。

恰逢10月中旬人形机器人板块整体走强,尽管公司已明确表示 “腱绳业务尚未批量生产,未产生实质性收益”,但市场依然照炒不误。于是,一家做汽车胎圈钢丝的传统制造企业,就这样成了10月A股最“疯狂”的股票之一。

11个交易日,股价翻倍

大业股份并非一家没有分量的公司,它总部位于山东潍坊,2017年在上交所主板上市,是全球领先的胎圈钢丝生产企业。

根据公开数据,2025年,大业股份的胎圈钢丝国内市占率达到36.23%,客户覆盖米其林、普利司通、固特异、中策橡胶、玲珑轮胎等全球主要轮胎厂。

虽然是名副其实的“隐形冠军”,但在轮胎产业链里,胎圈钢丝却是一门典型的“苦生意”:下游轮胎厂强势,原材料价格波动,毛利率被两头挤压。也正因如此,公司的业绩表现平平,今年上半年的归母净利润更是由盈转亏,反映到二级市场,其股价在8-9月期间一直处于9元/股上下,成交平淡。

转折发生在10月16日。当天公司股价突然涨停,收于9.91元/股,第一板就此诞生。此后,涨停像被按下了连续键:10月19日~23日,5个交易日收获5连板,市值达到54.5亿元。

针对公司股价的短期异常波动,交易所坐不住了。10月22日,上交所向大业股份下发监管工作函,公司随即在22日、23日、24日连发三封股票交易异常波动公告和风险提示,措辞一次比一次重:“近期换手率大幅抬升,多空资金分歧较大,存在短期大幅回调风险”“市场情绪可能过热,存在非理性炒作”。

但这些提示没能按住股价。10月26日,公司股价盘中再度涨停,最高17.56元,虽然尾盘未能封住,但依然高收超8个百分点,此后四天,在千股下跌的行情下,大业股份依然逆势走高。

截至10月30日收盘,公司股价报19.52元/股,11个交易日累计上涨116.65%,市值翻倍至66.71亿元。

一根“腱绳”引发的狂欢

大业股份股价大涨的背后,并非其主业突然迎来了转机,而是市场把人形机器人的叙事,套在了这家胎圈钢丝龙头身上。

熟悉行业的都知道,灵巧手已经成为当下人形机器人最受关注的部件之一,而灵巧手要完成抓、捏、拧、转等精细动作,传动方案是关键,目前市场上的主流路线有三条:分别是连杆传动、齿轮传动和腱绳传动。大业股份此番暴涨,正是沾了“腱绳”两个字的光。

时间回拨到2024年11月,当时,大业股份出资300万元成立了全资子公司“山东大业机器人科技”,业务涵盖智能机器人的研发、销售,以及人工智能硬件的销售和工业机器人制造等。次年4月,这家公司与北京邮电大学签下一份开发服务协议,内容正是围绕“人形机器人腱绳材料与感知功能”开展研发合作。2026年10月,“人形机器人”板块整体强势爆发,市场翻出了这份旧协议,将其视作大业股份跻身相关概念股的“铁证”,大量资金随之涌入。

不过有意思的是,从现有信息来看,大业股份的“腱绳”尚不足以支撑这波逆天行情。

根据公司财报,2026年上半年,钢帘线、胎圈钢丝、胶管钢丝业务分别贡献营业收入11.89亿元、10.38亿元和1.76亿元。按24.63亿元的总营收计算,三项业务合计占比高达97.56%,而“腱绳”二字甚至没有出现在财报上。

图片

(图片来源:大业股份半年报)

此外,公司也在最近发布的公告中反复强调:“现有主营业务依然聚焦于胎圈钢丝、钢帘线以及胶管钢丝的研发、生产和销售。备受关注的机器人腱绳产品,目前仅处于客户送样验证阶段,尚未实现量产,也未产生实质性收益。”

可A股市场有时候就是这么魔幻——即便财报摆在那里,但资金依然选择相信故事。

值得一提的是,故事与现实的差距,正在被最新的财报放大。10月30日下午,大业股份发布三季报:公司营业收入12.9亿元,同比上升2.7%,归母净利润却由去年同期亏损1902万元扩大至亏损5221万元,扣非归母净利润亦由亏损2542万元扩大至亏损5966万元。

这份三季报的发布,无疑为公司下一个交易日的股价走势增添了更多不确定性。

冰火两重天

当然,大业股份只是机器人板块这轮A股结构性行情中的一个缩影。自10月16日行情正式启动后,不少公司都迎来了一轮凌厉上涨。

襄阳轴承是同期另一只翻倍股,10月30日盘中,公司股价最高触及19.86元/股,较15日9.94元/股的收盘价上涨99.8%。此外,宇树科技、凡拓数创、安培龙、海天瑞声等公司,同期涨幅也均超过50%。

而与二级市场形成鲜明对比的是,当下一级市场对具身智能的态度明显冷静许多,关于“投资人已经不看具身智能”的讨论,开始频繁出现在媒体报道中。

类似的论调,我在近期交流中也听到不少,比如某早期VC投资人曾明确表态:“在市场出现类似DeepSeek似的颠覆性创新项目之前,自己不会再投具身智能了。”

不过,窗口收窄,并不意味着大门完全关闭。投资人B就表示,即便行业进入调整期,但具身智能作为长期方向的确定性依然毋庸置疑,只不过自己会把关注度聚焦在更上游的核心零部件环节。因为在他看来:“只要行业在向前发展,最终无论哪家本体厂商胜出,零部件都是刚需”。

此外他提到一个关键点:越是上游的公司,它的应用范围越广,不会因为某一个赛道的退潮,严重影响到企业基本盘。

以触觉传感器举例,这类核心零部件不仅服务于人形机器人,也可用于消费电子、医疗设备、汽车电子等场景。“有些具有成熟技术的公司已经拥有了稳定的客户群体和收入来源,这也为投资方提供了一定的财务安全垫。”

有相同想法的不在少数。大米创投董事长艾民在接受媒体采访时提到,机构在放慢具身智能赛道投资节奏的同时,正重点布局数据库这类“卖铲子”基础设施以及具身大脑;吴世春也同样在近期公开表示,梅花创投会优先投资具身智能上游核心零部件。

某种程度上,大业股份的股价暴涨,也是资金对机器人产业链“上游叙事”的一次情绪投射。不过,与二级市场靠“炒概念”就能在短期内推出翻倍行情不同,一级市场显然要复杂得多——它不只看短期热度,更要判断多年后这家公司是否还在产业链上。

注:文/王满华,文章来源:投中网(公众号ID:China-Venture),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:投中网

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

大业股份是一家什么公司,主营业务是什么?

大业股份总部位于山东潍坊,2017年在上交所主板上市,是全球领先的胎圈钢丝生产企业,2025年胎圈钢丝国内市占率达36.23%,客户覆盖米其林、普利司通、固特异、中策橡胶、玲珑轮胎等全球主要轮胎厂。2026年上半年营业收入24.63亿元,其中钢帘线、胎圈钢丝、胶管钢丝三项业务合计占比达97.56%。

大业股份为什么被市场称为人形机器人概念股?

2024年11月,大业股份出资300万元成立全资子公司山东大业机器人科技,业务涵盖智能机器人研发、销售及工业机器人制造;2025年4月,该子公司与北京邮电大学签署围绕“人形机器人腱绳材料与感知功能”的开发服务协议。2026年10月人形机器人板块整体走强,市场据此将其视作概念股,大量资金涌入。但公司明确表示腱绳业务尚未量产、未产生实质性收益。

大业股份股价为何能在11个交易日内翻倍?

2026年10月16日至30日,大业股份股价从9.01元涨至19.52元,累计涨幅116.65%,市值翻倍至66.71亿元,期间出现5连板。上涨动力来自人形机器人腱绳概念的题材炒作和板块行情,而非主业改善:2026年上半年营收24.63亿元、同比下降2.31%,归母净利润-6399.14万元、同比下降250.93%。上交所曾下发监管工作函,公司连发三封风险提示公告。

人形机器人灵巧手的传动方案有哪几种?

灵巧手是人形机器人最受关注的部件之一,要完成抓、捏、拧、转等精细动作,传动方案是关键。目前市场主流路线有三条:连杆传动、齿轮传动和腱绳传动。腱绳传动正是大业股份子公司与北京邮电大学合作研发的方向,也是其被贴上人形机器人概念股标签的直接原因。

具身智能一级市场的投资趋势发生了什么变化?

一级市场对具身智能的态度明显冷静,出现“投资人已经不看具身智能”的讨论,有早期VC投资人表示在市场出现类似DeepSeek的颠覆性创新项目前不再投该赛道。但长期确定性仍被认可,机构转向更上游的核心零部件环节,如触觉传感器、数据库等“卖铲子”基础设施和具身大脑;大米创投艾民、梅花创投吴世春均表示优先布局上游核心零部件。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

赞 +1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0