广告
加载中

当奶价击穿成本线 伊利为何“高价”锁死优然牧业?

关注新商业的 2026-07-15 14:06
关注新商业的 2026/07/15 14:06

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心内容为奶价创十年新低的乳业周期谷底,伊利增持控股国内最大原料奶供应商优然牧业的事件,核心干货信息如下:

1. 核心事件梳理:6月伊利通过境外子公司以11.73亿港元增持优然牧业,持股比例升至36.07%成为第一大股东,同时双方敲定未来三年累计超700亿元的原料奶购销长协,约定优然每年不少于70%产能优先供应伊利。当前优然牧业连续三年累计亏损超21亿元,短期资金缺口超140亿元,资产负债率达72%,资金链承压。

2. 事件背后逻辑:一方面优然牧业前身是伊利畜牧业务部门,是伊利最大原料奶供应商,属于命运共同体,伊利属于被动防御避免奶源布局出现真空;另一方面是主动卡位高速增长的低温鲜奶赛道,提前锁定符合新国标要求的高品质稳定奶源。

当前国内乳业发展呈现新的趋势,对各类乳企品牌商的干货参考如下:

1. 消费趋势变化:目前常温奶整体需求下滑,低温鲜奶成为新增长极,今年一季度国内低温奶销售额同比增长30.7%,机构预测2024年到2029年市场规模复合增速达10.7%,2025年实施的灭菌乳新国标要求只能用生乳做原料,对奶源品质和供应稳定性提出极高要求。

2. 供应链布局参考:奶价周期低谷时,可以通过股权+长协的模式绑定上游优质奶源,将原料奶这一可变成本转化为固定成本,既可以构建价格战的护城河,也能提前卡位增长赛道,这种轻资产控股模式无需并表承担上游高负债,就能锁定优质产能,性价比高于自建牧场。

3. 竞争新趋势:未来乳企竞争核心已经从品牌营销转向上游奶源供应链的竞争,头部乳企已经完成上游奶源布局,中小品牌需要提前规划适配自身的奶源方案。

本文针对乳类卖家整理了行业变化、机会风险与可参考方向如下:

1. 需求变化与增长机会:当前行业需求分化明显,常温奶整体需求持续下滑,低温鲜奶是明确的增量市场,头部品牌伊利的低温白奶品类营收增长已经超过20%,未来五年市场规模接近翻倍,是值得布局的增长赛道。

2. 行业现状与风险提示:目前国内奶价处于十年低点,全行业供需失衡,中小牧场和散户亏损面超过六成,超两成已经退养离场,低效产能持续出清;头部乳企已经完成上游优质奶源整合,中小卖家面临的成本和品质竞争压力大幅提升。

3. 可参考策略:新国标对原料奶要求提升后,卖家可以选择绑定头部规模化牧场锁定稳定供应,避开奶源品质不合规的风险,同时可以差异化布局中高端低温奶赛道,避开常温奶的价格红海。

本文给乳业上游牧场、乳加工生产工厂整理的干货内容如下:

1. 生产端需求变化:下游消费升级和新国标实施后,市场对奶源品质的要求大幅提升,低温奶要求生乳直接加工,对菌落指标、蛋白含量、供应稳定性都有更高标准,传统散户养殖和中小小规模牧场已经难以适配要求,正在持续退出市场。

2. 商业机会:当前规模化现代化牧场已经成为稀缺资源,头部下游乳企对优质奶源需求迫切,愿意通过长协+股权绑定的方式保障供应,头部品牌的稳定订单能够帮助牧场度过周期低谷,降低经营波动风险。

3. 发展启示:上游生产端要避免盲目扩张规模推高负债,要优先推进牧场的现代化标准化管理,匹配下游对高品质奶源的需求,积极对接头部品牌获得稳定订单,同时可以探索数字化管理提升奶源品质,控制生产成本。

本文给乳业相关服务商整理了行业趋势、客户痛点与市场机会如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:国内乳业正在经历周期调整,上游产能出清,头部集中趋势明显,行业竞争焦点从下游品牌营销转向上游供应链的品质和稳定性竞争,整个产业链对现代化服务的需求大幅提升。

2. 行业核心客户痛点:上游规模化牧场扩张后普遍面临高负债、资金缺口大的问题,中小牧场缺乏现代化管理和品质管控能力,难以满足下游需求;下游品牌商面临奶价波动风险,难以长期锁定稳定的高品质奶源,成本管控难度大。

3. 解决方案与市场机会:服务商可以针对上游牧场推出低成本融资服务、现代化牧场数字化管理服务、奶源品质管控技术服务;针对下游品牌商推出长期奶源对接服务、周期成本管控解决方案,抓住产业链整合过程中的新需求。

本文给乳品交易平台、生鲜电商平台等相关平台商整理的干货内容如下:

1. 行业对平台的新需求:当前乳业上下游都对稳定的优质奶源对接有强烈需求,上游牧场需要长期稳定订单平衡周期波动,下游品牌需要稳定高品质奶源控制成本,传统的零散撮合模式已经无法满足双方对确定性的需求。

2. 平台运营调整方向:招商端可以侧重引入规模化现代化牧场、中高端低温奶品牌,抓住低温奶高速增长的行业红利;运营端可以推出长期供需对接服务,帮助上下游签订长期框架协议,提升平台用户粘性。

3. 风向规避:行业目前处于周期低谷,波动较大,平台对接合作时要重点核查上游牧场的负债水平和资金链情况,排查经营风险;同时要关注乳企品牌的供应链稳定性,避免行业周期波动传导到平台,影响平台经营。

本文给乳业产业研究者提供了产业新动向、新模式与新研究方向的干货内容如下:

1. 产业新动向:国内乳业已经进入新的竞争阶段,竞争焦点从下游的品牌营销、渠道建设正式转向上游奶源供应链的布局竞争,头部乳企已经完成第一轮上游整合,伊利绑定优然牧业、蒙牛整合现代牧业与中国圣牧,两大头部阵营的奶源规模已经接近,行业格局发生永久性改变。

2. 创新商业模式:伊利探索出轻资产控股+长期购销协议的产业链绑定模式,这种模式相比自建牧场资本开支更低,相比普通采购订单约束力更强,同时不需要合并上游报表承担全部高负债,就能锁定上游的产能、品质和技术,是产业链垂直整合的新尝试。

3. 待研究的新问题:本次深度绑定是奶价周期谷底的特殊选择,未来奶价持续低迷时风险传导路径、周期反转后的收益弹性、被绑定上游企业能否完成扭亏转型实现价值共创,都是值得深入研究的新产业问题。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article focuses on Yili Group’s increased stake in Youran Dairy, China’s largest raw milk supplier, amid a decade-low milk price that has put the domestic dairy industry at the bottom of its cycle. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core event overview: In June, Yili acquired additional shares of Youran Dairy via an overseas subsidiary for HK$1.173 billion, raising its total stake to 36.07% and making it Youran’s largest shareholder. The two parties also signed a 3-year long-term raw milk supply agreement worth over 70 billion yuan, stipulating that at least 70% of Youran’s annual production capacity must be supplied to Yili as a priority. Currently, Youran has accumulated more than 2.1 billion yuan in losses over three consecutive years, faces a short-term funding gap of over 14 billion yuan, and carries a 72% asset-liability ratio, leaving it under severe capital pressure.

2. Underlying logic: On one hand, Youran originated as Yili’s internal livestock business division and is Yili’s largest raw milk supplier, making the two closely interdependent. Yili’s move is a defensive measure to avoid gaps in its milk source layout. On the other hand, it is a proactive positioning step to secure a stable supply of high-quality raw milk that meets new national standards for the fast-growing low-temperature fresh milk segment.

This article shares key insights for dairy brand operators amid new industry trends:

1. Changing consumer trends: Overall demand for ambient-temperature milk is declining, while low-temperature fresh milk has become the new growth driver. In Q1 this year, domestic low-temperature milk sales rose 30.7% year-on-year. Industry institutions forecast the market will maintain a 10.7% compound annual growth rate from 2024 to 2029. A new national standard for sterilized milk, effective in 2025, requires raw milk as the only allowed ingredient, raising the bar extremely high for milk source quality and supply stability.

2. Supply chain layout recommendations: During the trough of the dairy price cycle, brands can bind high-quality upstream milk sources through a combination of equity holding and long-term supply agreements. This structure converts the variable cost of raw milk into a fixed cost, builds a competitive moat for price wars, and secures position in the high-growth segment in advance. This light-asset holding model does not require consolidating the upstream company’s high liabilities on the balance sheet while still locking in high-quality production capacity, delivering higher cost-effectiveness than building own ranches.

3. New competitive landscape: The core of competition among dairy companies has shifted from brand marketing to upstream milk source supply chain competition. Leading dairy players have already completed their upstream layout, so small and medium-sized brands need to plan a milk source strategy tailored to their own scale in advance.

This article summarizes industry changes, opportunities, risks, and strategic directions for dairy sellers:

1. Demand shifts and growth opportunities: The industry is seeing clear demand divergence. Overall demand for ambient-temperature milk continues to decline, while low-temperature fresh milk is a definite growing market. Yili’s low-temperature plain milk segment already posts over 20% year-on-year revenue growth, and the overall market size is expected to nearly double in five years, making it a worthwhile growth segment for布局.

2. Industry status and risk warnings: Domestic milk prices are currently at a 10-year low, with supply-demand imbalance across the industry. Over 60% of small and medium-sized ranches and individual dairy farmers are operating at a loss, and more than 20% have exited the industry, leading to continued elimination of inefficient capacity. Leading dairy companies have already completed consolidation of high-quality upstream milk sources, putting significantly higher cost and quality competition pressure on small and medium-sized sellers.

3. Recommended strategies: After the new national standard raised requirements for raw milk, sellers can bind with large-scale leading ranches to secure stable supply and avoid non-compliance risks on milk source quality. At the same time, they can pursue differentiated布局 in the mid-to-high-end low-temperature milk segment to avoid the cutthroat price competition in the ambient-temperature milk market.

This article summarizes key takeaways for upstream dairy ranches and dairy processing factories:

1. Shifts in production-side demand: Driven by downstream consumption upgrading and the implementation of the new national standard, market requirements for milk source quality have increased significantly. Low-temperature milk requires direct processing with raw milk, which sets higher standards for bacterial count, protein content and supply stability. Traditional small-scale individual farming and small and medium-sized ranches can no longer meet these requirements and are steadily exiting the market.

2. Business opportunities: Large-scale modern ranches have become a scarce resource. Leading downstream dairy companies have strong demand for high-quality milk sources and are willing to secure supply via long-term agreements plus equity binding. Stable orders from leading brands can help ranches survive the cycle trough and reduce operational volatility.

3. Development insights: Upstream producers should avoid blind expansion that pushes up liabilities. They should prioritize modern, standardized management to match downstream demand for high-quality milk sources, actively partner with leading brands to secure stable orders, and explore digital management to improve milk quality and control production costs.

This article summarizes industry trends, customer pain points and market opportunities for dairy-related service providers:

1. Industry development trends: China’s dairy industry is undergoing cyclical adjustment, with upstream capacity being eliminated and concentration accelerating. The industry’s competitive focus has shifted from downstream brand marketing to upstream supply chain quality and stability, leading to sharply rising demand for modern industry services across the supply chain.

2. Core customer pain points: After expanding capacity, most large-scale upstream ranches face high leverage and large funding gaps. Small and medium-sized ranches lack modern management and quality control capabilities to meet downstream requirements. Downstream brand operators face milk price volatility risk, struggle to lock in stable high-quality milk sources long-term, and face great difficulties in cost control.

3. Solutions and market opportunities: Service providers can develop low-cost financing, digital management, and milk quality control services for upstream ranches, and launch long-term milk source matching and cyclical cost management solutions for downstream brands, to capture new demand generated during industry consolidation.

This article summarizes key insights for dairy trading platforms, fresh food e-commerce platforms and other relevant platform operators:

1. New industry demand for platforms: Both upstream and downstream players in the dairy industry have strong demand for stable matching of high-quality milk sources. Upstream ranches need long-term stable orders to offset cyclical volatility, while downstream brands need stable high-quality milk sources to control costs. Traditional fragmented matching models can no longer meet both parties’ demand for certainty.

2. Adjustments for platform operations: On the merchant acquisition side, platforms can prioritize onboarding large-scale modern ranches and mid-to-high-end low-temperature milk brands to capture the industry dividend of fast-growing low-temperature milk. On the operations side, they can launch long-term supply-demand matching services to help upstream and downstream parties sign long-term framework agreements, improving platform user stickiness.

3. Risk mitigation: The industry is currently in a cyclical trough with high volatility. When partnering with market participants, platforms should focus on verifying upstream ranches’ leverage levels and capital conditions to screen for operational risks. They also need to pay attention to the supply chain stability of dairy brands to avoid cyclical industry volatility spilling over to the platform and disrupting its operations.

This article summarizes new industry trends, business models and research directions for dairy industry researchers:

1. New industry dynamics: China’s dairy industry has entered a new competitive phase, with competition focus officially shifting from downstream brand marketing and channel expansion to upstream milk source supply chain布局. Leading dairy companies have completed the first round of upstream consolidation: Yili has bound Youran Dairy to its ecosystem, while Mengniu has consolidated Modern Farming and China Shengmu. The two leading groups now hold similar milk source scales, bringing permanent change to the industry landscape.

2. Innovative business model: Yili has developed a new industry chain binding model of light-asset holding plus long-term supply agreements. Compared with building self-operated ranches, this model requires lower capital expenditure; compared with ordinary supply orders, it delivers stronger binding force. It also does not require consolidating the upstream company’s high liabilities on the balance sheet while still locking in upstream production capacity, quality and technology, making it a new experiment in vertical industrial chain integration.

3. Open research questions: This deep binding deal is a special choice made at the bottom of the dairy price cycle. Future topics worthy of in-depth research include: the risk transmission path if milk prices remain depressed long-term, the earnings elasticity after the cycle reverses, and whether the bound upstream company can achieve turnaround and create shared value, among other new industry issues.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

优然牧业将决定这场700亿豪赌的最终成色。

文|郭梦仪

在牛奶价格战如火如荼之时,伊利做了一件让市场意外的事。

6月30日,伊利通过境外子公司博源投资,以每股3.92港元、总计11.73亿港元增持优然牧业,持股比例从33.93%升至36.07%,正式坐上第一大股东的位置。

这不是一次简单的产业抄底。

优然牧业的账面很难看:连续三年累计亏损超21亿元,资产负债率约72%。

商业数据派粗略计算,2025年年末,优然牧业的短期资金缺口超过140亿元,生物资产公允价值变动亏损更是高达43.12亿元。

在奶价跌回15年前低点的周期谷底,一家年营收超千亿的行业龙头,用股权和长协将国内最大原料奶供应商“焊死”在自己的供应链上。

这背后既有“大而不能倒”的被动防御,也有对低温鲜奶赛道结构性机会的主动卡位。

但更深层的真相是:当产业链咬合到如此深度,伊利已经别无选择。

1

优然的“大而不倒”

优然牧业的故事,开局堪称辉煌。

2021年6月,这家从伊利集团畜牧业务部门分拆出来的企业登陆港交所,以6.98港元/股的发行价募资约49.94亿港元,头顶“中国乳业上游第一股”和“全球最大原料奶供应商”的双重光环。

上市之初,优然牧业喊出“5年再造一个优然”的目标,计划在2025年将存栏量提升至80万头。

之后,优然牧业开启了扩张之路。

财报数据显示,截至2025年末,优然牧业运营100座牧场、15个饲料生产基地及16个草业生产基地,拥有61.88万头奶牛及1.99万只奶山羊,2025年原料奶产量达到423.25万吨,同比增长12.9%。

规模扩张的代价是沉重的财务包袱。

2023年至2025年,优然牧业归母净利润分别为-10.50亿元、-6.91亿元和-4.32亿元,三年累计亏损21.73亿元,年内亏损累计规模扩大至28.64亿元。资产负债率从2021年末的53.44%一路攀升至2025年末的72.05%,长期维持在70%以上的企业红线之上。

比亏损更紧迫的是资金链。商业数据派注意到,连年亏损之下,优然牧业的资金链已经明显承压。

2021年在港交所IPO上市时,优然牧业募集资金净额约为32.70亿港元(约人民币27.11亿元)。到2024年6月末时,这些资金就已经全部用完。

2025年末,优然牧业的短期借款仍高达160.83亿元,现金及等价物仅19.13亿元,资金缺口约141.7亿元。

高负债的直接后果是融资成本侵蚀利润。

2025年,优然牧业融资成本虽同比下降9.5%,仍高达8.18亿元。 这意味着公司每年要拿出近十分之一的营收来支付利息。

从伊利的举动来看,它意识到了优然牧业的风险,并开始做人事调整。

去年3月,优然牧业董事会主席袁军辞职,接任者是伊利24年老臣郝海军;同年6月,两名来自伊利的管理层白文忠、李林进入董事会担任非执行董事。

这场人事换血,被外界解读为伊利“坐不住”的信号:优然牧业的前身为伊利集团畜牧业务部门,2015年才分拆独立运营,作为伊利最大的原料奶供应商,双方早已是命运共同体。

如果优然牧业倒下,伊利将瞬间失去最大供应商,全国奶源布局出现真空。

在乳业上游集中度不断提升的背景下,这种“大而不能倒”的系统性绑定,让伊利的选择空间极其有限。

2

奶价十年最低

伊利为何“高价锁奶”

表面上看,伊利的操作与行业趋势背道而驰。

近几年,中国奶业深陷供需失衡,创下近十年新高,远超行业此前18—24个月的周期预判。

农业农村部监测数据显示,今年6月下旬,国内10大生鲜乳主产省份原料奶均价仅3.03元/公斤,较2021年4.37元/公斤的历史高点回落超三成,行业整体长期处于深度低价区间。

持续的低价行情不断挤压上游养殖端利润空间,抗风险能力薄弱的中小牧场、养殖散户长期处于亏损状态,大量小型养殖主体选择退养、离场,行业低效落后产能持续出清。

根据中国基金报的报道,去年上半年,全国辐射牧场平均亏损面达60%,20%以上牧场退出行业。

乳业巨头们同样也不好过。

数据显示,光明乳业在2025年归母净利润亏损1.49亿元,终结了连续16年的盈利纪录;蒙牛2024年净利润同比暴跌97.83%至1.045亿元,2025年虽恢复至15.45亿元,但背后计提了22至24亿元的一次性减值拨备。

这是一个绝对的买方市场。但伊利偏偏在此时继续加码。

4月,伊利和优然牧业正式敲定了未来3年的原料奶购销框架协议,明确约定优然牧业每年不少于70%的原奶产能优先供应伊利,3年累计原奶购销规模预计突破700亿元。

答案藏在乳制品的消费结构变化里。

近几年,低温鲜奶成为市场的新宠。

今年第一季度,国内低温奶销售额同比增长30.7%,而同期常温奶下滑3.1%。弗若斯特沙利文预计,低温鲜奶的市场规模将从2024年的369亿元增长至2029年的606亿元,复合年增长率达10.7%。

伊利自身的数据也印证了这一点:2025年液体乳业务实现营业收入704.22亿元,同比下滑6.11%,但上半年低温白奶品类营收增长逾20%。

低温鲜奶是一个“娇气”的品类。2025年9月实施的灭菌乳新国标明确禁止使用复原乳,要求灭菌乳只能以生乳为原料,这对奶源品质、菌落控制、供应稳定性提出了极高要求。

而INF杀菌、巴氏杀菌、3.6g乃至4.0g蛋白指标、19天保质期,每一项都需要上游牧场具备现代化管理能力。

在“五年翻倍”的市场空间面前,下游鲜奶打得越凶,上游能稳定供得上达标原奶的牧场就越稀缺。

而优然牧业100座现代化牧场、61.88万头存栏奶牛,以及29.8%的毛利率,构成了稀缺的基础设施。

所以,伊利不是在锁量,是在锁质。700亿长协的本质,是将原料奶这一最大可变成本转化为固定成本。

当对手还在为每日波动的奶价焦虑时,伊利已经提前锁定了三年的成本基准和品质基准。在价格战中,这种“固定成本策略”既是护城河,也是与周期的对赌。

3

一场“不得不救”的资本绑定

回到伊利的财报,这场绑定的战略意图更加清晰。

蒙牛营收下滑、光明乳业转亏之际,伊利成为唯一实现营收利润双增的综合性乳企。

数据显示,去年伊利实现营业总收入1159.31亿元,同比仅增长0.21%,但归母净利润达到115.65亿元,同比大增36.82%,净利率9.98%创下历史新高。

利润的增长并非来自营收扩张,而是来自降本:伊利的营业成本同比下降0.85%,销售费用下降1.99%,资产减值损失从2024年的46.76亿元大幅收窄至7.30亿元。

在液体乳收入下滑6.11%的背景下,伊利需要为低温鲜奶的扩张找到确定性。

而优然牧业2025年原料奶单价从2024年的4.12元/公斤降至3.86元/公斤,饲料成本却下行至1.88元/公斤,毛利率提升至29.8%。

这意味着,在周期底部,优然牧业仍有能力为伊利提供成本可控、品质稳定的原料奶。

但这场绑定也是一把双刃剑。

36.07%的股权+700亿长协,意味着伊利与优然“一荣俱荣、一损俱损”。

由于持股未达控制标准,优然牧业不并入伊利报表,而是作为联营企业按权益法核算。

2025年,优然牧业亏损4.32亿元,伊利按约36%比例承担约1.56亿元投资损失,仅占伊利当年归母净利润的1.3%,处于可控范围。

但一旦原奶价格进入上行周期,这笔投资的弹性将十分可观。

申万宏源3月预测,优然牧业2026年归母净利润有望达13.9亿元,届时伊利按36%股权比例可确认约5亿元投资收益,实现从“负贡献”到“正增量”的逆转。

这种轻资产控股模式,比自建牧场的资本开支更轻、比长期采购订单的约束力更牢:无需并表承担优然的高负债,却拿到了上游技术、数据与产能的“VIP通行证”。

但风险同样真实。如果未来三年奶价持续低迷甚至继续下跌,伊利将被套牢在高位长协中,无法享受低价红利。

更何况,蒙牛的应对同样迅速——2025年通过现代牧业整合中国圣牧,形成“双轮驱动”的奶源体系,整合后奶牛存栏超61万头、年原奶产能突破400万吨。

两大阵营的存栏规模已非常接近,但中国乳业的竞争维度已经永久改变——未来的赢家不再只看谁的广告更响,而是看谁能用资本锁定更稳定、更高品质的奶源供应链。

4

结语

伊利增持优然牧业,很难用简单的抄底或扩张来概括。

在奶价十年最低的周期谷底,一家年营收超千亿的行业龙头,用股权和长协将国内最大原料奶供应商“焊死”在自己的供应链上。

这背后既有“大而不能倒”的被动防御,也有对低温鲜奶赛道结构性机会的主动卡位。

优然牧业的150亿资金缺口不会因为这11.7亿港元而消失,伊利的700亿长协也无法保证三年后的奶价一定回暖。但在这个产业链深度咬合的时刻,双方都没有更好的选择——上游需要下游的订单续命,下游需要上游的奶源保底。

而优然牧业能否从“被拯救者”真正蜕变为“价值共创者”,将决定这场700亿豪赌的最终成色。

注:文/关注新商业的,文章来源:商业数据派(公众号ID:business-data),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:商业数据派

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

伊利为什么要增持优然牧业?

优然牧业是国内最大原料奶供应商,也是伊利核心奶源提供商,若其经营出险将导致伊利奶源布局出现真空。同时当前低温鲜奶赛道增速快,对稳定高品质奶源需求极高,伊利通过增持成为第一大股东+签订3年700亿长协,可锁定3年原奶成本与品质基准,卡位低温奶赛道,抵御供应链风险。

低温鲜奶赛道的发展前景怎么样?

2024年国内低温鲜奶市场规模达369亿元,弗若斯特沙利文预计2029年将增长至606亿元,复合年增长率达10.7%。2025年9月实施的灭菌乳新国标要求灭菌乳仅能使用生乳为原料,对上游奶源品质、供应稳定性提出更高要求,稳定优质奶源成为行业核心竞争力。

优然牧业当前的经营状况如何?

优然牧业是全球最大原料奶供应商,截至2025年末运营100座牧场,奶牛存栏61.88万头,年原料奶产量423.25万吨。2023-2025年累计亏损超21亿元,2025年末资产负债率达72.05%,短期资金缺口约141.7亿元,融资成本高达8.18亿元,资金链承压明显。

奶价下行对国内乳业有什么影响?

当前国内原料奶均价较2021年高点回落超三成,上游中小牧场亏损面达60%,20%以上牧场退出行业,行业低效产能持续出清。下游乳企也受到波及,光明乳业2025年归母净利润亏损1.49亿元,蒙牛2024年净利润同比暴跌97.83%,行业整体承压。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0