广告
加载中

618“静悄悄” 蕉内十年线下迷途

冯羽 2026-06-09 14:18
冯羽 2026/06/09 14:18

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文梳理了网红内衣品牌蕉内成立十年的发展历程,以及当前面临的多重增长考验,核心干货如下:

1. 蕉内的发展路径:2016年靠“去掉水洗标”的差异化创新切入内衣赛道,集中资源卡位天猫平台吃到流量红利,快速增长到2021年投后估值20亿美元,2024年GMV突破60亿元,成为内衣赛道头部玩家,目前品牌重新定位为“体感科学公司”,已完成从内衣到家居服、防晒、冲锋衣的全品类布局。

2. 当前蕉内面临的核心问题:渠道过度依赖线上,流量分散后投放转化率下滑,线下扩张推进缓慢,全国门店不足百家,多集中在一二线核心商场,百城计划面临复杂的经销利益博弈;全品类扩张未构建护城河,品牌定位模糊,中高端定位受白牌性价比冲击,2021年后无新融资,IPO窗口收窄,增长动能待解。

本文以蕉内为案例,展现了新消费内衣品牌的发展规律与现存问题,给新消费品牌从业者提供了经验参考与风险警示,核心内容如下:

1. 可借鉴的成长经验:早期抓住消费者未被满足的细分痛点切入低集中度的大市场,集中资源卡位核心电商平台抓住流量红利,靠差异化爆品实现快速起量;在概念红利耗尽后,重新聚焦产品核心优势,将品牌定位调整为体感科学公司,聚焦舒适感构建品牌护城河,尝试回归产品本质破解增长困局。

2. 需要警惕的发展风险:渠道过度依赖线上,流量红利消退后,线上流量被大量新老玩家瓜分,投放转化率持续下滑;线下品牌扩张需要重构零售能力,要面对复杂的经销利益博弈,难以快速实现规模化;全品类盲目扩张容易模糊品牌定位,无法构建有效品类护城河;中高端定位在消费分级、白牌崛起的背景下,品牌溢价空间会被持续挤压,资本降温后融资上市难度大幅提升。

本文分析了新消费内衣品牌蕉内的增长困局,给内衣赛道卖家提供了风险提示、机会参考与可学习经验,核心内容如下:

1. 风险提示:当前传统电商流量增量已经见顶,多渠道分散获客推高了成本,线上投放转化率持续下滑;各大电商平台都在出台扶持政策扶持产业带白牌商家,白牌凭借极致性价比对中价位品牌形成了强烈冲击;全品类扩张如果没有清晰的品牌定位,反而会分散品牌焦点,无法构建护城河,削弱用户认知。

2. 可学习经验与机会提示:新卖家起盘可以借鉴蕉内早期路径,聚焦细分痛点打造差异化爆品,集中资源卡位核心平台流量,实现快速起量;当流量红利耗尽后,可以学习蕉内重新聚焦产品核心竞争力,深耕体感差异化优势,打造品牌壁垒;海外市场是新的增长突破口,可以尝试布局挖掘增量。

3. 线下扩张提示:原生线上卖家布局线下,需要提前培养线下零售能力,充分预估经销体系的利益博弈问题,不要盲目追求扩张速度。

本文分析了内衣行业的竞争格局与需求变化,给服装生产加工工厂带来了多方面的启示与商业机会,核心内容如下:

1. 产品生产设计需求变化:当前消费者越来越重视服装的穿着舒适感,“体感科学”已经成为新的产品研发方向,像去除摩擦皮肤的水洗标这类细节的体验创新,依然有市场机会;随着头部品牌全品类扩张,工厂需要具备覆盖内衣、家居服、防晒、户外冲锋衣等多品类的生产设计能力,才能匹配品牌客户的需求。

2. 商业机会:当前国内服装产能过剩,大量白牌依托工厂供应链崛起,各大电商平台纷纷出台产业带扶持政策,鼓励白牌商家发展,中低端大众消费市场对高性价比产品需求旺盛,工厂可以直接为白牌供货,或者依托自身供应链优势打造自有白牌产品,抢占大众市场。

3. 数字化电商启示:工厂转型To C端直接对接消费者,需要搭建自身的数字化电商运营能力,依托各大平台的扶持政策,可以更低成本触达C端用户,分享行业增长红利。

本文梳理了当前新消费内衣行业的发展趋势与核心痛点,给服装赛道相关服务商提供了明确的行业洞察与业务方向,核心内容如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:内衣行业已经从早期的增量市场转入存量博弈阶段,行业整体高度分散,2022-2024年头部品牌CR10仅占约20%,白牌凭借性价比优势快速崛起,改变了原有竞争格局;流量从传统集中电商平台分散到多个内容电商渠道,线上原生新消费品牌普遍面临线下扩张能力不足的问题。

2. 客户核心痛点:新消费品牌目前普遍存在这些痛点:线上投放获客成本不断上升,转化率持续下滑,多渠道运营能力不足;线下扩张缺少成熟的零售运营经验,难以平衡品牌渠道掌控力和经销商利益之间的关系;全品类扩张后品牌定位模糊,需要重新梳理品牌叙事构建护城河;资本降温后增长压力大,急需寻找新的增长曲线。

3. 业务方向:服务商可以针对性开发多渠道投放运营服务、线下经销体系搭建咨询服务、品牌定位梳理服务等产品,帮助新消费品牌解决成长过程中的各类痛点。

本文分析了不同类型内衣商家的发展需求与现状,给电商平台的招商、运营带来了多方面启示,核心内容如下:

1. 商家端的需求与现存问题:头部新消费品牌目前有全渠道布局的需求,线上端需要更精准高效的流量投放服务,降低获客成本,线下扩张需要对接更多线下资源支持;白牌和产业带商家对平台流量扶持、渠道对接的需求很高,希望借助平台力量直接触达C端消费者。

2. 当前平台政策的影响:目前各大平台推出的产业带扶持政策,比如抖音的产业带服务商权益、拼多多的百产计划、淘宝的星产地项目,确实有效加速了白牌商家的崛起,改变了内衣行业的竞争格局,同时也分流了头部品牌的流量,加剧了行业竞争。

3. 平台运营优化方向:平台一方面可以针对头部新消费品牌优化流量服务,对接各类资源,吸引头部品牌深耕平台;另一方面可以继续扶持产业带白牌商家,丰富平台供给,满足不同层级消费者的需求,同时需要规范市场竞争,平衡不同类型商家的发展空间,构建健康的平台生态。

本文以成立十年的新消费代表品牌蕉内为案例,展现了当前国内新消费内衣产业的发展新动向与新问题,给产业研究提供了鲜活的研究样本,核心内容如下:

1. 产业发展新动向:新消费内衣品牌经过十年的发展,已经进入洗牌深耕阶段,行业发展逻辑从早期的流量驱动爆发增长,转向产品驱动的长期竞争;整个行业从增量市场转入存量博弈阶段,白牌崛起成为影响行业竞争格局的核心变量,消费分级加剧了行业内部分化;电商流量红利消退后,全渠道布局成为头部品牌的必然选择,线上原生品牌线下扩张成为行业需要解决的新课题。

2. 产业现存新问题:线上原生品牌线下扩张面临难以破解的经销体系利益博弈难题,无法快速复制传统品牌的全国渠道网络;多数品牌的全品类扩张反而模糊了品牌定位,难以构建有效的品牌护城河;中高端品牌在消费降级趋势下,品牌溢价空间被白牌持续挤压,资本降温后新消费品牌的融资上市难度大幅提升,增长压力凸显。

3. 商业模式研究价值:早期蕉内采用的淘系D2C直营模式在流量红利期运营效率极高,但红利消退后,这种模式如何拓展新的增长空间,仍然需要行业探索更多可行路径。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines the 10-year development journey of viral Chinese intimate apparel brand Bananain, and the multiple growth challenges it currently faces. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Bananain's growth trajectory: It entered the intimate apparel market in 2016 with the differentiated innovation of "removing fabric wash tags", concentrated resources to capture traffic dividends on Tmall, and grew rapidly. It reached a post-money valuation of $2 billion in 2021, hit 6 billion yuan in GMV in 2024 to become a top player in the sector. It has repositioned itself as a "body science company" and expanded from intimate apparel to a full product portfolio covering loungewear, sun protection apparel and hardshell jackets.

2. Core challenges Bananain faces today: It is overly reliant on online channels, and conversion rates have dropped as traffic has fragmented across platforms. Its offline expansion has progressed slowly: it operates fewer than 100 stores nationwide, concentrated mostly in premium shopping malls in first- and second-tier cities, and its national expansion plan faces complex interest conflicts in its distribution network. Its full-category expansion has failed to build a sustainable competitive moat, leaving its brand positioning ambiguous. Its mid-to-premium positioning is under growing pressure from low-cost generic brands, it has not secured new funding since 2021, and the window for an IPO has narrowed, leaving its future growth momentum uncertain.

This article uses Bananain as a case study to illustrate the growth patterns and ongoing challenges of new consumer intimate apparel brands, offering practical insights and risk warnings for new consumer brand practitioners. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Actionable growth lessons: In the early stage, brands can tap into an underserved niche pain point to enter a large, fragmented market, concentrate resources to secure positioning on core e-commerce platforms to capture traffic dividends, and scale quickly via differentiated hit products. When concept-driven growth fades, brands can refocus on core product strengths, reposition around product value, and build a competitive moat around comfort to address growth stagnation by returning to product fundamentals.

2. Key risks to watch out for: Over-reliance on online channels leaves brands vulnerable when traffic dividends fade, as online traffic gets split between a growing pool of new and incumbent players, pushing down ad conversion rates continuously. Offline expansion requires brands to rebuild retail capabilities and navigate complex distribution interest negotiations, making rapid scaling extremely difficult. Unplanned full-category expansion can easily blur brand positioning and prevent brands from building an effective category moat. Against the backdrop of consumption polarization and the rise of generic brands, the premium pricing space for mid-to-high-end brands is steadily eroded, and funding and IPO opportunities become much harder to secure after the capital cooldown.

This article analyzes the growth challenges facing new consumer intimate apparel brand Bananain, offering risk warnings, opportunity insights and actionable lessons for sellers in the intimate apparel sector. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Risk warnings: Traditional e-commerce traffic growth has already peaked, and multi-channel customer acquisition has pushed up costs while dragging down online ad conversion rates. Major e-commerce platforms have rolled out support policies for generic brands from industrial clusters, and these players' extreme value proposition has created intense pressure on mid-priced branded players. Full-category expansion without a clear brand positioning will only dilute brand focus, prevent the building of a competitive moat, and weaken consumer brand recognition.

2. Actionable lessons and opportunity insights: New sellers can learn from Bananain's early-stage strategy: focus on a niche pain point to build a differentiated hit product, concentrate resources to capture traffic on core platforms, and scale quickly. When traffic dividends fade, brands can follow Bananain's example to refocus on core product competitiveness, deepen differentiation around user experience, and build brand barriers. Overseas markets represent a new growth breakout point that sellers can explore for incremental demand.

3. Tips for offline expansion: Online-native brands looking to expand offline should build out in-house retail capabilities early, fully anticipate the interest conflicts that come with building a distribution network, and avoid chasing unplanned rapid expansion.

This article analyzes the competitive landscape and shifting consumer demand in the intimate apparel industry, offering multi-faceted insights and business opportunities for apparel manufacturing and processing factories. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Shifts in product design and manufacturing demand: Consumers now place growing emphasis on wearing comfort, and "body science" has emerged as a new product R&D direction. Even small experience-focused innovations such as removing irritating wash tags still carry meaningful market opportunity. As top brands expand their product portfolios, factories need to build design and manufacturing capabilities across multiple categories including intimate apparel, loungewear, sun protection apparel and outdoor hardshell jackets to meet the needs of brand clients.

2. Business opportunities: China's domestic apparel industry suffers from overcapacity, and a wave of generic brands have risen to prominence relying on factory supply chains. Major e-commerce platforms have rolled out support policies to encourage the growth of generic brands, and demand for cost-effective products remains strong in the mass mid- to low-end market. Factories can either supply directly to generic brands, or build their own generic labels leveraging their existing supply chain advantages to capture share in the mass market.

3. Digital e-commerce insights: For factories looking to transition to direct-to-consumer (D2C) operations, building in-house digital e-commerce operation capabilities is essential. Leveraging support policies from major platforms allows factories to reach end consumers at lower cost and capture a share of industry growth dividends.

This article outlines current development trends and core pain points in the new consumer intimate apparel industry, offering clear industry insights and business direction for apparel sector service providers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: The intimate apparel industry has shifted from an early high-growth incremental market to a stage of zero-sum competition. The sector remains highly fragmented: the top 10 brands held a combined market share of only around 20% between 2022 and 2024. Generic brands have risen rapidly with their cost advantage, reshaping the original competitive landscape. Traffic has shifted away from concentrated traditional e-commerce platforms to fragmented content e-commerce channels, and online-native new consumer brands almost universally lack the capabilities to scale offline.

2. Core client pain points: New consumer brands broadly face the following challenges: rising online customer acquisition costs, persistently falling conversion rates, and a lack of multi-channel operation capabilities. For offline expansion, they lack mature retail operation experience, and struggle to balance brand channel control with distributor interests. Full-category expansion has left many with ambiguous brand positioning, requiring them to rebuild their brand narrative to build a competitive moat. After the capital cooldown, they face mounting growth pressure and an urgent need to identify new growth curves.

3. Targeted business opportunities: Service providers can develop tailored offerings including multi-channel ad operation services, offline distribution system consulting, and brand positioning strategy services to help new consumer brands solve the various pain points they encounter along their growth journey.

This article analyzes the current status and development needs of different types of intimate apparel brands, offering multi-faceted insights for e-commerce platform merchant acquisition and operation. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Merchant needs and existing pain points: Top new consumer brands currently have demand for omni-channel expansion. Online, they need more accurate and efficient traffic services to lower customer acquisition costs, while offline expansion requires access to more offline resource support. Generic brands and industrial cluster merchants have strong demand for platform traffic support and channel access, and hope to leverage the platform's power to reach end consumers directly.

2. Impact of current platform policies: Existing industrial cluster support policies rolled out by major platforms — such as Douyin's industrial cluster service provider benefits, Pinduoduo's 100-Industrial-Clusters Plan, and Taobao's Star Origin program — have effectively accelerated the rise of generic brands, reshaping the competitive landscape of the intimate apparel industry. However, these policies have also diverted traffic away from top branded players and intensified industry competition.

3. Optimization directions for platform operation: Platforms can on one hand optimize traffic services for top new consumer brands and connect them with various resources to encourage them to deepen their presence on the platform. On the other hand, they can continue to support generic brands from industrial clusters to enrich platform supply and meet the needs of consumers at different price points. At the same time, platforms need to regulate market competition, balance development space for different types of merchants, and build a healthy platform ecosystem.

This paper uses Bananain, a 10-year-old representative new consumer brand, as a case study to illustrate new dynamics and emerging challenges in China's current new consumer intimate apparel industry, providing a vivid research sample for industry research. Key findings are as follows:

1. New industry dynamics: After a decade of development, new consumer intimate apparel brands have entered a stage of consolidation and deep cultivation. The industry's growth logic has shifted from early traffic-driven explosive growth to product-driven long-term competition. The entire sector has moved from an incremental market to zero-sum competition, and the rise of generic brands has become a core variable reshaping the competitive landscape, with consumption polarization intensifying internal industry fragmentation. As e-commerce traffic dividends fade, omni-channel expansion has become an inevitable choice for top brands, and offline expansion for online-native brands has emerged as a new core challenge the industry must address.

2. Emerging industry challenges: Online-native brands looking to expand offline face intractable interest conflicts within distribution systems, and cannot quickly replicate the national channel networks built by traditional apparel brands. Most brands' full-category expansion efforts have blurred their brand positioning instead, making it difficult to build an effective competitive moat. In the context of deflationary consumer trends, the premium pricing space of mid-to-high-end brands is being steadily eroded by generic brands. After the capital cooldown, it has become much harder for new consumer brands to secure funding and complete an IPO, leaving them facing severe growth pressure.

3. Research value for business model study: Bananain's early Taobao-based direct-to-consumer (D2C) model delivered extremely high operational efficiency during the traffic dividend era. But after dividends faded, how this model can unlock new growth space still requires the industry to explore more viable paths.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

今年618步入高潮,却鲜少有蕉内的消息。

两个月前,凭借“体感科学”一词,这家成立十年的内衣品牌又重回大众视野。

时间倒回十年前,当一枚小小的水洗标还在摩擦消费者的皮肤时,蕉内毅然选择了“摘掉它”。

从2016年靠一枚“无感标签”撕开内衣市场的切口,到2020年GMV突破10亿,再到2021年投后估值达20亿美元,蕉内曾是名副其实的“网红内衣品牌”。

然而十年之后,这个曾经的“新消费明星”正面临多重考验:渠道高度依赖线上,线下门店不足百家且高度集中于一二线核心城市,百城计划面前是复杂的经销利益博弈;从内衣延展到家居服、防晒、冲锋衣的全品类扩张,在每个细分赛道都面临着同质化竞争。

而真正让蕉内创始人感到警惕的,并非优衣库这类巨头,而是产能过剩背景下汹涌袭来的白牌大军。

今年4月17日,在十周年发布会上,蕉内再次聚焦于内,将公司定位于一家“体感科学公司”,从科学的体感标准,将核心竞争力集中在舒适感上,对品牌调性和运营逻辑一以贯之。

然而,当传统老牌都开始相继推出无感内衣产品,ubras、内外等更是和蕉内站在同一起跑线上的新消费品牌,让消费者变得舒适这样的“无感标签”不再具有稀缺性。

成立十年、估值超百亿,但蕉内自2021年后再无新融资,IPO窗口也正在收窄,市场在问:蕉内的故事,如何继续讲下去?

1

从“无感标签”,到百亿估值

2016年,国内内衣市场还被都市丽人、爱慕等传统品牌主导,消费者对“缝制水洗标刺痒”的痛点已习以为常,蕉内做了一个看似微小却极具创新的举动——去掉了那条令人不适的水洗标,推出“tagless无标签内裤”。这是蕉内崛起最质朴的起点。

抓住水洗标的行业痛点,选择了一个品牌集中度低但市场庞大的高频消费赛道,蕉内的两位创始人均为设计师出身,产品既简约又有设计感.....正是这样的产品逻辑和运营思路,让蕉内从内衣赛道中快速撕开一道口子。

但真正让蕉内从新消费浪潮中脱颖而出的,是电商平台在特定阶段释放的巨大流量红利。

创始人臧崇羽曾总结道,2016年到2020年间,蕉内并未分散精力抓取微博、小红书、抖音等平台流量,而是将资源高度集中在天猫,“做好天猫几乎等于做好线上”。

这种精准卡位带来了惊人的回报——年增速一度高达300%,短时间内冲至内衣品类TOP1。

2020年,蕉内迎来了一个又一个高光时刻:双十一期间销售额突破4.15亿元,内裤、保暖品类双双蝉联行业第一,同年11月完成数亿元A轮融资,由元生资本独家投资,投后估值达到25亿元,创下了近十年国内内衣品牌估值最高纪录。

次年,蕉内再获老虎环球基金7000万美元战略融资,投后估值攀升至约20亿美元,成为新消费领域最耀眼的明星之一。

伴随品牌崛起,蕉内的产品边界也在迅速扩张。2019年从贴身内衣延伸至居家场景,2020年从“内着”走向“外着”,2021年全面迈入全品类布局,到2023年拓展至防晒、运动、冲锋衣等更复杂的穿着场景。

在这期间,蕉内推出了“重新设计基本款”的品牌口号,向外界宣告自己绝不是一个只卖内衣的品牌。凉皮、热皮、银皮、氧气文胸等一系列产品矩阵逐一亮相,覆盖温、湿、触、压、防五大体感维度。

到2024年,蕉内GMV已超60亿元,远超Ubras同期约35亿元的销售额,成为内衣市场无可争议的头部玩家。

在十周年发布会上,臧崇羽则表示蕉内未来“不做向外炫耀的衣服,只做向内安顿的体感。”在蕉内官网,做“一家体感科学公司”的字眼占据了首页最显眼的位置。

然而,高光之下,暗流早已涌动。

2

线上网红,线下迷路

蕉内早期依赖传统货架电商,是典型的淘系D2C模式,通过差异化爆品,借助流量红利实现爆发式增长,这种直营逻辑取消了经销环节,管理效率极高。

淘系之外,蕉内小红书主打种草,侧重“体感测评+细节特写+日常穿搭”;抖音则主打店铺直播,突出产品功能和科技感;微博负责品牌升维,选定王一博、刘浩存为代言人,发布高级大片和品牌态度内容,拉高调性。

传统电商平台流量已被头部品牌和主播瓜分,增量有限,蕉内只得将目光投向新型内容电商渠道。据飞瓜数据,2025年抖音618期间,蕉内官方旗舰店直播,付费投流为流量来源的大头。

然而此时正值618购物节高峰期,有米云数据显示,近30天内,蕉内官方旗舰店直播引流素材和商品广告素材仅为101和17个,均有所下滑,其投放趋势和达人带货销量也创一个月新低。且直播投放素材多为王一博同款防晒衣,即便有明星光环加持也并未带来较高的转化。

蕉内的崛起高度依赖线上渠道,这一点在红利期是优势,如今却成了绕不开的隐忧。618期间投放收缩,蕉内或许也意识到电商整体的投放转化率正在降低。

更严峻的是,不仅ubras、内外、全棉时代品牌纷纷押注线上,爱慕、汇洁等传统内衣品牌也纷纷补课电商,原本属于新锐品牌的线上流量池正被越来越多的玩家重新瓜分。臧崇羽坦言,“现在成交渠道被极大地分散,你要充分获取用户,恨不得六个渠道”。

而线下,似乎才是解决品牌认知模糊的关键所在。“蕉内和蕉下是一个品牌吗?”一位普通消费者的“灵魂发问”,恰好戳中了蕉内的品牌软肋。

而蕉内的线下之路走得并不顺畅。品牌自2020年底启动“着陆计划”,至今在全国开设的门店不足百家。根据官网信息,蕉内已在全国30个城市开出67家线下体感空间,其中深圳布局9家。

从门店分布来看,蕉内体验店多集中在一二线城市——深圳、北京、武汉、成都、上海这5城占比接近一半,且90%以上门店集中在万象城、大悦城等头部连锁商场,同质化竞争和资金压力较大。

相比之下,传统内衣品牌主打线下经销渠道。截至2025年末,平价内衣品牌都市丽人门店超4000家,中高端内衣品牌爱慕也拥有超1700家品牌门店,渠道网络覆盖全国。

对此,臧崇羽也坦言,“一个电商公司要养成线下零售能力,是需要蜕层皮的,没有那么简单”。

未来,蕉内计划将线下体验空间覆盖中国100个主要城市。但百城计划的落地,面临的是比开网店复杂得多的渠道困局:如何在保证品牌对渠道掌控力的情况下实现规模的快速扩张,终将是悬在头顶的“达摩克利斯之剑”。

而这套复杂的利益博弈,正是电商出身的新锐品牌相较传统品牌的最大短板。

3

“全军出击”,却遭白牌掀桌

与全域渠道布局相对的,则是蕉内引以为傲的全品类扩张。从内衣延伸到家居服、防晒服、冲锋衣、保暖内衣,几乎每一个细分赛道都已是红海。

从消费者角度来看,春夏季节,防晒赛道有蕉下、OhSunny等垂直品牌可选;冬季保暖领域,优衣库、恒源祥等老牌占据深厚心智;冲锋衣品类则有北面、哥伦比亚等户外品牌牢牢把控。

蕉内在每一个细分领域都面临着各种各样的对手,当“重新设计基本款”的故事讲遍后,全品类尚未给蕉内构筑起坚固的品类护城河,反而让品牌定位逐渐变得模糊——消费者很难准确说出,除了内衣外,蕉内究竟“还做得好”什么。

而品类方面的“全军出击”,也让竞争对手变得更加分散。臧崇羽在一次专访中直言不讳:“总体来讲,蕉内最大的对手是白牌,因为产能过剩,再加上整体下行的经济环境,大多数人消费降级,就很容易对我们形成冲击。”

这句话点出了当前内衣行业竞争格局最核心的转变。中国供应链效率极高,工厂端的竞争让生产成本持续下降,大量白牌借助抖音、拼多多等平台快速崛起,以极致性价比攻城略地。

《2026全球女士内衣市场洞察白皮书》数据显示,2022年至2024年,中国女性内衣市场头部品牌CR10仅占约20%,行业高度分散且白牌林立。

“不是大牌买不起,而是白牌更具性价比”正成为越来越普遍的消费心态,爱慕股份在财报中就明确提到,中高端需求疲软是业绩下滑的重要原因之一。

而从抖音“产业带服务商权益”到拼多多“百产计划”扶持产业带商家入店开播,再到“淘宝星产地”聚焦中小商家,电商平台的扶持政策还在持续加码,进一步加速白牌供给的崛起与渗透。

蕉内定位中高端,70元到300元的价格带天然处于白牌火力的覆盖范围之内,在消费分级加剧的背景下,品牌的溢价空间正遭遇严峻挑战。

「创业最前线」查询有米云数据也发现,在抖音近30天的热销榜单上,女睡裙品类Top10中蕉内品牌位列第七,其余均为白牌;而店铺里的C位王一博同款防晒衣属于男外套品类,Top10凉感外套中多为老牌男装品牌、户外品牌及白牌,并未出现蕉内身影。

仅从抖音这一线上渠道可得知,一旦相关类目白牌的性价比优势突出,将对蕉内线上单品销售形成冲击。

在资本层面,蕉内的处境同样微妙。2021年A轮融资后,估值攀升至约20亿美元,但此后四年多,蕉内再未披露任何新的融资消息。与此同时,新消费赛道的投融资热度在2022年后急剧降温,资本对新品牌的耐心或兴趣正在下滑。

内衣行业则从增量市场转入存量博弈阶段,传统内衣品牌普遍承压——2025年国内6家上市内衣企业中,爱慕股份、都市丽人营收和利润双双下滑,家居服饰品牌洪兴股份归母净利润同比下滑73.77%,德国内衣品牌黛安芬也在同年11月宣布退出中国大陆市场。

在这样的行业寒冬中,蕉内虽仍有超60亿的GMV体量,但上市窗口正在收窄。蕉内方面从未公开否认上市计划,但成立十年仍未登陆资本市场的现实,让外界对品牌后续增长动力愈发关注。

面对重重困局,蕉内在十周年之际将品牌叙事重新聚焦到“体感科学”上,试图回归产品本质,建立更深的品牌护城河。

从成立体感科学研究院,到将海外市场作为下一个增长突破口,蕉内正在努力回答一个核心问题:如何在概念红利耗尽之后,真正成为一个穿越周期的品牌。

但问题的另一面也同样尖锐——当白牌用同样的供应链、同样的面料甚至更低的价格提供了“足够好”的替代品时,消费者还愿意为蕉内的品牌溢价买单吗?

当全品类扩张分散了品牌焦点,而线下百城计划又缓步推进时,蕉内的下一个十年从哪里获取增长动能?这些问题,臧崇羽和他的团队显然已有觉察。但觉察与解题之间,还有一条漫长的路要走。

正如他在一次访谈中所说,现在更重要的“并不是看谁爆发力比较强,而是看谁命长”。对蕉内而言,十年故事远未到终章,但接下来每一页的落笔,都将比过去沉重得多。

注:文/冯羽,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:创业最前线

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0