广告
加载中

上市九年首次亏损 平均每天关店8家 昔日“万店之王”遇挑战

天下网商 2026-05-19 09:06
天下网商 2026/05/19 09:06

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章核心介绍了曾经的卤味行业万店之王绝味鸭脖,当前遭遇上市九年来首次亏损、持续关店的生存危机,核心干货如下:

1.核心经营数据:2025年绝味营收54.67亿元,同比下降12.62%,归母净亏损1.91亿元,是2017年上市以来首次年度亏损;2024-2025年累计关闭近6000家门店,平均每天关店8家,2025年底在营门店只剩2023年巅峰期的三分之二。

2.消费者普遍遭遇的问题:绝味鸭脖终端价格大幅上涨,折算后一斤超过50元,接近进口牛肉价格,还存在计量单位模糊套路、店员习惯性强行加称的问题,被消费者吐槽为卤味刺客,同时食品安全问题频发,黑猫投诉平台相关投诉超1800条。

3.行业整体情况:整个卤味行业增速放缓,周黑鸭、煌上煌也在关店,多数消费者减少了购买频次,大量消费者转向量贩零食店、社区团购等替代渠道。绝味目前正在推进全场景转型,但尚未见效。

本文梳理了卤味巨头绝味陷入危机的全过程,以及整个卤味行业的发展现状,能给卤味品牌带来诸多参考,核心干货如下:

1.当前消费趋势变化:卤味行业已经从高速增长转为低速增长,2024年市场规模增速仅3.7%,远低于2018年的18.6%;消费者消费趋于理性,对价格敏感度大幅提升,超过八成受访者减少了连锁卤味的购买频次,价格上涨是首要影响因素,需求分流到量贩零食、社区团购等多个渠道。

2.品牌经营的核心坑点:下沉市场布局的品牌,用户对价格敏感度更高,原料降价后终端售价不下降会严重流失老客,食品安全问题、价格套路会进一步损害口碑;多层级加盟架构会拉长利益链条,挤压终端加盟商利润,动摇渠道根基。

3.可参考的同行转型经验:主动清退低效门店,提升核心商圈高势能门店占比,优化单店坪效;抓住原料价格波动调整利润空间,积极拓展商超、量贩等新渠道,通过并购拓展新赛道打开增长空间。

本文总结了卤味行业的发展现状和头部品牌的成败经验,能给卤味行业卖家提供清晰的风险提示和机会参考,核心干货如下:

1.当前行业的风险提示:卤味行业已经进入存量博弈阶段,消费者冲动型购买减少,对价格十分敏感,高价很容易劝退消费者;原有线下门店渠道增长见顶,客流被量贩零食店、社区团购、电商直播等多个渠道分流,竞争加剧。

2.值得警惕的经营教训:价格不透明、强行加称等套路会快速消耗消费者信任,产品价格只涨不跌会大量流失老客;多层级加盟模式会层层加价,终端加盟商利润空间被严重挤压;食品安全问题频发会直接摧毁品牌口碑,导致客流下滑。

3.可借鉴的经验与机会方向:主动优化门店结构,清退低效益低效门店,聚焦核心商圈提升单店盈利;抓住原料价格波动合理调整利润,积极拓展全品类,覆盖夜宵、家庭采购、白领午餐等多个场景,进入商超、量贩渠道寻找新的流量增量。

本文分析了卤味行业的消费变化和头部品牌的转型方向,给卤味生产加工工厂提供了诸多参考,核心干货如下:

1.产品生产与设计的需求变化:当前消费者对卤味的需求已经从单一的鸭副休闲零食,转向覆盖多场景的全品类产品,需要开发适配夜宵、社区日常采购、白领午餐、家庭聚餐等不同场景的产品,包括热卤、主食、饮品、畜类卤味、家庭装拼盘等多种品类,差异化需求越来越明显。

2.当前可以把握的商业机会:头部卤味品牌都在推进全品类全场景转型,对多品类产品生产的需求大幅提升;同时头部品牌开始进入商超、量贩零食等第三方渠道,产生了更多批量稳定订单的需求,给上游工厂带来了新的业务增量。

3.对工厂数字化与电商化转型的启示:行业进入存量竞争后,成本控制和柔性生产能力越来越重要,工厂需要适配品牌多品类小批量的生产需求,优化生产管理,通过数字化手段降低生产管理成本,才能更好地对接品牌转型的需求。

本文梳理了当前卤味行业的发展趋势和核心痛点,给面向卤味行业的服务商明确了市场需求和服务方向,核心干货如下:

1.行业发展整体趋势:卤味行业已经完成增量扩张,进入存量优化阶段,行业逻辑从渠道扩张驱动转向产品和单店效益驱动,整体增速放缓,多数头部品牌都在推进战略转型,市场对专业服务的需求大幅提升。

2.行业客户的核心痛点:传统多层级加盟架构利益分配不合理,导致终端价格下不去、单店利润变薄,体系转型难度大;品牌拓展多品类新店型后,标准化管理难度提升,人力和管理成本大幅上涨,多品类布局对供应链的灵活性要求大幅提高,现有能力无法满足。

3.可切入的解决方案方向:可以针对加盟体系提供扁平化管理优化、利益分配重构的咨询服务;针对门店管理提供低成本数字化管理系统,帮助品牌降低多门店多品类的管理成本;针对供应链需求,提供柔性供应链服务,适配多品类小批量的供货需求,帮助品牌控制成本。

本文披露了卤味行业头部品牌的转型需求和发展现状,给各类零售平台商带来了诸多参考,核心干货如下:

1.品牌端对平台的核心需求:当前卤味品牌原有线下加盟渠道增长已经见顶,存量竞争下都在寻找新的流量增量,绝味、周黑鸭等头部品牌都已经开始进入商超、量贩零食渠道,头部卤味品牌有明确的入驻第三方平台、拓展新渠道的需求。

2.平台可推进的相关动作:可以针对卤味品牌的新渠道需求,开放品牌入驻,针对卤味尤其是鲜卤产品的特性,搭建适配的仓储配送体系,保障产品鲜度,满足品牌和消费者的需求;还可以针对卤味品牌的全品类布局,给到流量扶持,帮助品牌快速起量,丰富平台自身的产品品类。

3.需要注意的风险:卤味行业整体盈利能力下滑,不同品牌经营状况差异较大,平台招商过程中需要做好筛选,重点关注产品力强、单店盈利情况好的品牌,规避经营风险过高的品牌,同时可以抓住行业整合的机会,吸纳优质转型品牌,丰富平台供给。

本文展现了国内卤味行业从增量扩张到存量博弈的完整转型过程,提供了头部品牌不同战略的对比样本,对产业研究有较高的价值,核心干货如下:

1.当前卤味产业的新动向:国内卤味行业增速大幅下滑,从2018年的18.6%降至2024年的3.7%,消费需求发生明显变化,消费者价格敏感度提升,冲动消费减少,需求分散到多个渠道,行业竞争逻辑从规模竞争转向单店效益竞争,头部品牌纷纷探索全场景全品类的新增长模式。

2.产业发展中出现的新问题:万店规模的多层级加盟模式在存量市场会出现反噬效应,层层加价挤压终端利润,架构调整难度大,转型远慢于中小规模品牌;多品类全场景转型会抬高管理成本,增加标准化难度,企业原有规模化复制的优势难以发挥,多元化投资打造第二增长曲线的成功率较低,容易持续亏损。

3.典型商业模式研究样本:本文对比了绝味的四级加盟扩张模式,周黑鸭主动关店优化+多渠道驱动模式,煌上煌降本拓新模式,不同模式在存量市场的经营结果差异明显,为研究连锁加盟商业模式在不同行业发展阶段的适配性提供了非常典型的研究样本。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article profiles Juewei Duck Neck, once the largest chain player in China's prepared meat snack industry, which is currently facing its first loss since going public nine years ago and a sustained wave of store closures. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core operating data: In 2025, Juewei posted revenue of 5.467 billion yuan, a 12.62% year-on-year drop, with a net loss attributable to shareholders of 191 million yuan. This marks the company's first annual loss since its 2017 IPO. From 2024 to 2025, the chain closed nearly 6,000 stores, an average of 8 stores per day. By the end of 2025, its operating store count was just two-thirds of its 2023 peak.

2. Common consumer pain points: Juewei has raised retail prices sharply, with the effective price exceeding 50 yuan per jin (0.5kg), close to the price of imported beef. Consumers also complain about opaque pricing tactics and cashiers habitually adding extra product beyond what customers ordered, earning the brand the label of "price gouger" among Chinese shoppers. Food safety incidents are also frequent, with more than 1,800 related complaints logged on consumer complaint platform Black Cat.

3. Industry-wide context: Growth across the entire prepared meat snack sector has slowed. Rivals Zhou Hei Ya and Huang Shanghuang are also closing stores, and most consumers have reduced their purchase frequency, with many shifting to alternative channels such as bulk snack stores and community group buying. Juewei is currently pursuing an omni-scenario transformation, but efforts have yet to yield results.

This article outlines the crisis unfolding at leading prepared meat snack brand Juewei, as well as the current state of the broader industry, offering key insights for prepared meat snack brands. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Shifting consumer trends: The prepared meat snack industry has slowed from high-speed growth to low single-digit growth, with market size expanding just 3.7% in 2024, down sharply from 18.6% in 2018. Consumers have become more rational and far more price-sensitive; more than 80% of survey respondents have reduced their purchases of chain-store prepared meat snacks, with price hikes cited as the top reason. Demand has fragmented across alternative channels including bulk snack stores and community group buying.

2. Key pitfalls for brand operation: For brands with a strong presence in lower-tier markets, consumers are even more price-sensitive. Failing to lower retail prices after raw material costs drop will lead to severe customer churn, while food safety issues and deceptive pricing tactics will further erode brand reputation. Multi-tiered franchise structures lengthen the profit chain, squeeze margins for terminal franchisees and undermine channel foundations.

3. Actionable takeaways from peer transformations: Proactively eliminate underperforming stores to increase the share of high-potential locations in core business districts and optimize per-square-meter sales. Adjust profit margins in line with raw material price fluctuations, expand into new channels such as supermarkets and bulk snack stores, and unlock new growth via acquisitions into adjacent categories.

This article summarizes the current state of the prepared meat snack industry and the success and failure lessons of leading brands, providing clear risk warnings and opportunity references for sellers in the sector. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current industry risk warnings: The prepared meat snack industry has entered a stage of stock competition. Impulse purchases are declining, and consumers are extremely price-sensitive, meaning high prices easily drive customers away. Growth of traditional offline store channels has peaked, and foot traffic is being poached by bulk snack stores, community group buying, e-commerce live streaming and other channels, intensifying competition.

2. Operational warnings to heed: Opaque pricing, forced over-ordering and other tactics erode consumer trust very quickly, and continuously rising prices drive massive churn among existing customers. Multi-tiered franchise models lead to markups at every level, severely squeezing terminal franchisee margins. Frequent food safety issues directly destroy brand reputation and cause foot traffic to plummet.

3. Lessons and opportunity directions to leverage: Proactively optimize store networks by closing low-performing, inefficient stores and focusing on core business districts to improve per-store profitability. Adjust pricing and profit reasonably in line with raw material price fluctuations, expand full-category offerings to cover late-night snacks, household grocery shopping, white-collar lunches and other scenarios, and enter supermarkets and bulk snack channels to capture new traffic growth.

This article analyzes shifting consumer demand in the prepared meat snack industry and the transformation directions of leading brands, offering key references for prepared meat processing factories. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Changing demand for product development and design: Consumer demand for prepared meat snacks has shifted from single duck byproduct snacks to full-category products covering multiple consumption scenarios. Factories need to develop products adapted to late-night dining, daily community grocery shopping, white-collar lunches, family gatherings and other scenarios, including hot prepared meat, staple foods, beverages, red meat prepared products, family-sized combo packs and other categories, as differentiated demand grows increasingly prominent.

2. New business opportunities to capture: Leading prepared meat brands are all pushing forward full-category, omni-scenario transformations, driving a sharp increase in demand for multi-category production. At the same time, leading brands are expanding into third-party channels such as supermarkets and bulk snack stores, generating more demand for stable bulk orders, bringing new business growth for upstream factories.

3. Insights for digital and e-commerce transformation: After the industry entered stock competition, cost control and flexible production capabilities have grown in importance. Factories need to adapt to brands' demand for multi-category, small-batch production, optimize production management, and reduce production and management costs via digital tools, to better meet the needs of brands undergoing transformation.

This article summarizes current development trends and core pain points in the prepared meat snack industry, clarifying market demand and service directions for service providers targeting the sector. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Overall industry development trends: The prepared meat snack industry has completed its incremental expansion phase and entered a stage of stock optimization. The industry's growth driver has shifted from channel expansion to product and per-store efficiency, with overall growth slowing. Most leading brands are pursuing strategic transformations, leading to a sharp increase in market demand for professional services.

2. Core pain points of industry clients: The traditional multi-tiered franchise system has unreasonable profit distribution, keeping terminal prices high, compressing per-store profits and making system-wide transformation difficult. After brands expand into multi-category new store formats, standardized management becomes more difficult, leading to sharp increases in labor and management costs. Multi-category expansion also requires far more flexible supply chains than existing capabilities can support.

3. Accessible solution directions: Service providers can offer consulting services for flattening franchise management structures and restructuring profit distribution. They can provide low-cost digital management systems for store operations to help brands cut management costs for multi-store, multi-category operations. For supply chain needs, they can offer flexible supply chain services adapted to multi-category, small-batch delivery requirements to help brands control costs.

This article outlines the transformation needs and current development status of leading prepared meat snack brands, offering key references for all types of retail platform operators. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core demand from brands for platforms: Growth of leading prepared meat brands' traditional offline franchise channels has peaked, and they are all seeking new traffic growth amid stock competition. Top brands including Juewei and Zhou Hei Ya have already started expanding into supermarkets and bulk snack channels, and have clear demand for entering third-party platforms to open up new channels.

2. Actionable steps for platforms: Platforms can open up brand onboarding to meet brands' new channel demand, and build adapted warehousing and delivery systems tailored to the characteristics of fresh prepared meat products to preserve product freshness and meet the needs of both brands and consumers. They can also offer traffic support for brands' full-category expansion to help them scale quickly, while enriching the platform's own product assortment.

3. Risks to note: Overall profitability across the prepared meat snack industry is declining, and operating performance varies widely across brands. Platforms need to conduct thorough screening during merchant recruitment, prioritize brands with strong product capabilities and solid per-store profitability to avoid brands with excessive operating risk. They can also leverage industry consolidation to attract high-quality transforming brands to enrich platform supply.

This article presents the full transformation of China's prepared meat snack industry from incremental expansion to stock competition, providing a comparative case study of different strategies adopted by leading brands, with high value for industrial research. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New trends in China's prepared meat snack industry: Industry growth has slowed sharply, from 18.6% in 2018 to 3.7% in 2024. Consumer demand has changed notably: consumers are more price-sensitive, impulse purchases are declining, and demand is fragmented across multiple channels. The industry's competitive logic has shifted from scale competition to per-store efficiency competition, and leading brands are all exploring new growth models based on omni-scenario, full-category offerings.

2. New problems emerging in industrial development: The multi-tiered franchise model that enabled 10,000-store scale creates a backlash effect in a stock market: markups across multiple layers squeeze terminal profits, structural adjustment is extremely difficult, and transformation proceeds far slower than for smaller brands. Full-category, omni-scenario transformation pushes up management costs and increases the difficulty of standardization, making it hard for enterprises to leverage their original advantage in scalable replication. The success rate of building a second growth curve via diversified investment is low, often leading to sustained losses.

3. A typical research sample for business model analysis: This article compares Juewei's four-tier franchise expansion model, Zhou Hei Ya's strategy of proactive store closure optimization plus multi-channel growth, and Huang Shanghuang's cost-cutting and expansion approach. The operational results of these different models in the stock market differ significantly, providing a highly typical research sample for studying the adaptability of chain franchise business models across different industry development stages.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

从“万店之王”到“卤味刺客”,绝味鸭脖做错了什么?

十几年前,许多年轻人会在周末花上十几元,顺手买两三根绝味鸭脖回家追剧。那时候的鸭脖,是街头巷尾的烟火气,也是一代人的“追剧神器”。

可是现在呢?打开绝味鸭脖小程序,小份招牌鸭脖18元/180克,换算成斤,一斤就要50元——那种“顺手买一点”的轻松感,彻底消失了。

社交平台上,“月薪过万,啃不起鸭脖”成了打工人的自嘲,“卤味刺客”的话题频频冲上热搜,被吐槽最多的,是那些躲不过的“套路”:保鲜柜里的价格数字大而醒目,计量单位却标着小小的“250克”,一不留神就买多了;一些店员还有“习惯性加称”的手艺,明明要买15元,手一抖就夹出20元的量——知乎上有人问“你遇到过绝味鸭脖强行加称吗?”,收获了5859个回答,天南海北的网友分享了五花八门的遭遇。

消费者用脚投票,直接反映在绝味食品(以下简称“绝味”)的最新财报上。

2025年,绝味实现营收54.67亿元,同比下降12.62%;归母净利润为-1.91亿元,上年同期为2.27亿元,同比由盈转亏,暴跌184.11%。这是绝味自2017年上市以来首次出现年度亏损。

首亏背后是持续的关店潮。窄门餐眼数据显示,2024年和2025年,绝味累计关闭近6000家门店,平均每天关8家。2025年底,绝味全国在营门店还剩10624家,相当于2023年巅峰期的三分之二。

当消费者发现家门口的绝味门店悄悄地消失,外卖配送范围越来越远,这个曾以“万店规模”称霸卤味行业的巨头,正经历着上市以来最严峻的生存危机。

关店潮拖累卤味主业收入

绝味由盈转亏的直接原因,是一笔高达3.42亿元的补缴税款及滞纳金。

2025年9月,绝味收到中国证监会湖南监管局下发的《行政处罚事先告知书》,原因是2017年至2021年,公司瞒报加盟门店装修业务收入,合计隐匿营收约7.24亿元。绝味因此被实施其他风险警示,股票简称变成了“ST绝味”。

今年4月,绝味发布公告称,已将3.42亿元补缴税款及滞纳金全部缴清,将分别计入2025年和2026年的当期损益——这笔钱,大约相当于其2024年归母净利润的1.5倍。

然而,即便刨除这笔一次性损失,绝味的经营状况依旧严峻——2025年,扣非后归母净利润为7544.47万元,同比下滑62.82%,根本原因是卤味主业明显萎缩。

年报显示,2025年绝味卤制食品销售收入同比下滑14.04%至44.90亿元,其中鲜货类产品——占主营业务比重七成以上的核心业务——收入同比下降16.18%至40.73亿元。鲜货类产品里的禽类制品(鸭脖、鸭翅、鸭锁骨等)收入为31.05亿元,同比下滑16.85%。绝味最能打的产品,也越来越难卖了。

销售下滑的首要原因,是渠道收缩。卤味销售高度依赖线下门店,绝味能成为“卤味一哥”,靠的就是急速扩张的加盟网络:2019年突破万店,营收51.72亿元;2023年门店总数增至15950家,营收也冲上72.61亿元的历史峰值。

扩张趋势在2024年骤然反转。2024年,绝味营收下滑13.84%至62.57亿元,公司在年报中不再披露门店数据。而窄门餐眼数据显示,2024年绝味新开866家门店,关闭2980家,年末存量为12887家;2025年新开645家,关闭2908家,年末存量为10624家;到2025年底,绝味全国在营门店10624家,只剩2023年巅峰期的三分之二。

渠道收缩背后,是加盟商方面在缩减。年报显示,2025年,绝味来自加盟商管理的收入为5695.22万元,较2023年的8304.98万元缩水超三成;合同负债从期初的1.68亿元跌至期末的1.15亿元,预收货款、预售加盟费和预售培训费全部大幅缩减,合同负债直接反映了加盟商拿货的积极性,数据下滑意味着下游渠道对绝味产品的销售预期趋于谨慎。

连锁品牌高价卤味劝退消费者

绝味的危机并非个案。整个卤味行业,近年来都在消费需求变迁和竞争加剧中承受着巨大压力。同为卤味三巨头,周黑鸭和煌上煌也在关店:周黑鸭的门店数从2023年底的3816家降至2025年底的3019家,煌上煌的门店数则从2023年底的‌4497家‌降至2025年底的2898家。

红餐产业研究院数据显示,2024年中国卤味市场规模为1573亿元,同比增速仅3.7%,而2018年这个数字是18.6%。卤味属于典型的冲动型消费——路过门店,顺手买一点,可是当人们花钱趋于理性,非计划性购买减少,对价格越来越敏感,卤味行业受到冲击。

2024年,《中国新闻周刊》旗下有意思报告调查了2296位消费者,超过八成的受访者坦言减少了在连锁品牌买卤味的频次,其中86.67%的人把“价格上涨”列为影响购买频次的第一因素。

卤味三巨头现在有多贵?定位杭州,同时打开绝味鸭脖、周黑鸭和煌上煌的小程序比价。煌上煌的鸭脖最便宜,折算下来一斤也要44元——几乎与盒马在售的冰鲜原切澳洲谷饲牛腱肉一个价。当作为“休闲零食”的鸭脖卖出进口牛肉的价钱,较多打工人难以接受。

三巨头都被嫌贵,但绝味的问题却更棘手,因为它的渠道更“下沉”,顾客对价格也更敏感。窄门餐饮数据显示,绝味在二线以下城市的店铺分布比例远高于周黑鸭等品牌,乡镇店的比重也远大于其他同行。

渠道在下沉,售价却在上涨。2022年初,鸭副产品原料价格暴涨,绝味将部分产品提价5%,随后又对鸭掌、鱿鱼、凤爪等品类加价,平均涨幅在7%至10%,暂时保住了毛利率,但也劝退了对价格敏感的顾客,加盟商的盈利空间受到挤压。

自2024年起,鸭副产品原料价格逐步回落。到了2025年上半年,煌上煌半年报披露的鸭颈采购均价甚至同比下降38.70%,可绝味的终端售价几乎未变。“只涨不降”,又赶跑了一大波老客。

如果高价能换来品质保证,也许部分消费者仍会买单,但绝味频发的食品安全问题却令人不安。黑猫投诉平台上,以“绝味鸭脖”为关键词进行搜索,累计有超过1800条投诉,内容涉及“不新鲜”“变质”“吃出异物”“食后腹泻呕吐”“强买强卖”等。

在乎性价比、质价比的消费者,掉头转向了量贩零食店、社区团购、即时零售生鲜和电商直播。当消费需求日益分散,替代品层出不穷,连锁品牌鸭脖正从“追剧神器”沦为可有可无的选项。

卤味三巨头业绩分化

2025年,鸭副产品原料价格低位运行,卤味行业整体复苏,但卤味三巨头的业绩却出现分化:周黑鸭营收25.36亿元,同比增长3.5%,归母净利润同比增长59.6%至1.57亿元;煌上煌营收虽同比下降3.2%至16.8亿元,但是归母净利润却同比提升102.3%至8160万元,实现了翻倍增长;绝味则是营收、净利润双降。

都是关店,周黑鸭、煌上煌的逻辑却与绝味不同。

周黑鸭门店数一度在2025年6月底下探至2864家,这是因为它从2024年开始主动大规模砍掉低效门店,保留核心商圈高势能门店,将直营门店占比提升至约60%。2025年,周黑鸭单店月均销售额同比增长13.6%。同时,周黑鸭把经典卤料包和散装产品打进了山姆、胖东来、永辉等商超,用新渠道补上客流缺口,“门店+渠道”双轮驱动的策略初见成效。

煌上煌在2025年净关762家门店,同样是以清退低毛利加盟店为主,提升核心商圈高势能门店占比,以改善单店坪效和盈利能力。更关键的是,煌上煌抓住2025年鸭副产品价格的历史低位,加大战略储备,把上游降价的红利几乎原封不动装进了利润端。同时,它还通过并购冻干食品企业立兴食品,拓展了新赛道。

周黑鸭和煌上煌重构增长逻辑的过程已经说明:行业从增量竞争转向存量博弈时,卤味行业的护城河不再是规模,而是单店效益。

加盟网络四级架构的反噬

绝味并非没有看到行业转向,2025年年报中有一段很“清醒”的表述:“当前卤味赛道正处于存量优化与增量创新并行的阶段,行业正面临从渠道驱动向产品驱动的深刻变革。”

然而,比起周黑鸭和煌上煌的轻巧转身,绝味庞大的门店规模与更长的管理半径,决定了它很难快速完成转型。更麻烦的是,它的加盟网络搭建在一套复杂的“加盟商委员会”体系之上。

2012年,绝味创始人戴文军借鉴医药公司经验,将全国门店划成上百个战区,让加盟商代表参与管理,逐渐形成“全国总会—片区委—省级分委会—战区委”的四级架构,逐级代理,分层激励。

这套架构在增量市场有利于快速铺店,是绝味冲向万店规模、年均净增门店超千家的法宝。可当市场饱和、需求疲软时,它的负面效应开始反噬:总部、区域加盟商、终端门店之间的利益链条拉得越长,终端价格越难降,单店利润越薄。一旦客流下降、促销加码、损耗上升,最先扛不住的往往是处于链条末端的加盟商。

据界面新闻报道,一位江苏地区的加盟商表示,他的门店日均营业额约3000元,毛利率约30%,一年净赚不到7万元。另一位江苏的绝味鸭脖店员则说,她所在的社区店2023年生意还不错,2024年营业额“直接对半砍”,2025年彻底关门。

单店效益一旦下滑,加盟商赚不到钱,动摇的就是整个加盟体系的根基。关店潮不仅拉低了绝味的营收,还拖累了产能利用率,单位固定成本不降反升。2025年,在原料大幅降价的背景下,绝味的毛利率却从2024年的33.96%跌至31.2%。

绝味公司的投资业务也在失血。2022年至2024年,绝味多次通过旗下资本平台投资廖记棒棒鸡、和府捞面、蛙来哒、幸福西饼、书亦烧仙草等品牌,试图打造“第二增长曲线”,结果连续三年录得超亿元投资亏损。2025年,投资板块依然在拖后腿,投资收益为-4990.88万元。

从“卖鸭脖”走向“卤味+”

面对危机,绝味正在全力自救。从2025年下半年开始,公司推出了一系列转型动作,试图从“卖鸭脖”走向“卤味+”,把卤味的消费认知从“休闲零食”升级为覆盖全场景的“生活解决方案”。

门店端,绝味在去年末推出三大新店型:绝味PLUS,在经典卤味基础上新增卤肉饭、创意炸卤、微醺饮品,瞄准年轻人的夜宵场景,营业时间延至23点;绝味鲜卤走社区鲜食便利店路线,90多款SKU覆盖五大品类,适配家庭日常采购、应急用餐等高频需求;绝味煲煲布局写字楼,26.9元起的单人热食砂锅,凭借快速出餐抢占白领午餐市场。此外,绝味部分门店还在试点“涅槃店”,在鸭货之外增加了卤牛肉、串串、窑鸡、麻辣烫等产品。

产品端,绝味试图摆脱对禽类制品的依赖,推动产品向“热卤+主食+饮品”全时段延展。2025年11月,上线“热卤杯”套餐,把卤味和主食打包成低价正餐;2026年,在全国范围铺开猪牛副产品卤味拼盘,主攻家庭聚餐等场景。公司明确提出,要从鸭副卤制品为主,转向畜类、素食等全品类,完成从“单一单品”到“全品类矩阵”的升级,以打破增长瓶颈。

渠道端,绝味2025年前五大客户中出现了王小卤、鸣鸣很忙、沃尔玛,说明它正试图通过零食品牌、量贩渠道和商超体系寻找新增量。

绝味的转型动作很多,但也充满了不确定性。用“卤味+”构建全场景消费矩阵的策略看似周全,但更多的品类会显著抬高门店的人力成本和管理成本,新店型标准化管理的复杂度也将大幅上升。而模型越复杂,规模化复制越困难,而后者恰恰是绝味最核心的能力之一。

2026年一季报显示,绝味营收12.65亿元,同比下滑15.71%;净利润7135.65万元,同比减少40.53%;市值从2021年峰值的超过630亿元,缩水至目前的不足80亿元。

转型尚未见效。加盟商委员会的四级架构如何扁平化?总部与加盟商的利益如何重新分配?定价权能否下放?——这些问题,绝味必须回答,而且得快。

注:文/天下网商,文章来源:天下网商(公众号ID:txws_txws),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:天下网商

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0