广告
加载中

低价小包货量腰斩!欧盟关税新政后 跨境直发物流怎么活?

王昱 2026-10-08 16:36
王昱 2026/10/08 16:36

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

总:欧盟取消150欧元以下进口小包关税豁免,7月起每件征收3欧元固定关税,11月还要加约2欧元处理费,跨境直发小包成本上升,影响欧洲电商购物。

1. 目前欧洲空运小包货量明显下滑,但没崩盘,9月起开始止跌。海关数据显示,比利时低价值小包数量同比降53%,标准申报货量反而涨102%,商品均价从5.73欧元升到10.85欧元,说明低端低价商品正在减少,合规商品价格上升。

2. 直发模式没消失,仍有卖家坚持,但玩法变了:卖家更多鼓励消费者对同一单品多件购买,用多件折扣摊薄每件税成本。以前是搭配不同商品,现在是促复购。

3. 对普通买家来说,低价小包的免税红利结束,商品价格可能上涨,运输时效可能更依赖海外仓发货。短期内部分直发包裹可能因清关更严而变慢,但整体物流网络并未瘫痪。

总:欧盟关税新政改变欧洲跨境零售的履约和营销逻辑,品牌商需重新设计渠道与定价策略。

1. 消费者端,低价小包直发的免税红利消失,商品到手价上升,卖家开始用多件折扣引导复购,品牌可借鉴:从扩品类转向促复购,用同款多件优惠降低单件税费成本,稳住转化。

2. 渠道建设:本地仓发成为主流,海外仓入库品类明显增加,轻小件也批量进仓。品牌若想深耕欧洲,需要建立或合作欧洲仓配网络,将核心SKU前置,保证时效与合规。

3. 定价与成本:物流成本不再只看头程运费,而是全链路成本,包括仓储、干线、库内操作、尾程、退货。品牌定价需考虑这些变量,并重视合规,避免因清关问题造成断货和额外成本。

总:欧盟取消小额包裹关税豁免后,欧洲直发模式受到冲击,但机会与风险并存,卖家需调整备货和运营策略。

1. 政策现状与风险:7月起每件小包征3欧固定关税,11月拟增2欧处理费。比利时低价值小包清关量同比降53%,标准进口申报量升102%,空运货量曾下滑30%,直发单量短期降20%,小货代欧洲业务减半。继续依赖低价灰清的路已不通,必须走合规。

2. 应对措施:直发不会完全消失,因资金效率和测款优势仍在。建议分层迁移:先把核心SKU放入欧洲仓,再逐步扩大库存、建立区域仓网。铺货大卖不能立刻切割,可保留部分直发占比。

3. 增长机会:海外仓需求爆发,仓库面积扩张,卖家可入驻优质海外仓,批量走整柜拼柜再本地配送,降低成本。同时,营销上从搭配销售改为多件复购折扣,摊薄每件关税。选择服务商时,清关稳定性、时效确定性、合规能力比低运价更重要。

总:欧盟关税新政正在改变中国制造出口欧洲的模式,工厂的生产备货和产品设计要跟着履约方式调整。

1. 产品需求变化:过去大量直邮的轻小件(3C配件、家居小配饰、纺织小件)开始批量进入欧洲海外仓,工厂可以针对海外仓备货型订单优化包装和批量生产,减少小包单件发货依赖。

2. 商业机会:本地仓发模式成为主流,货物通过整柜拼柜批量出口再本地配送,意味着工厂可以承接更稳定的批量订单,而不是碎片化小包直发订单。

3. 物流模式从直发转仓发,要求卖家备货周期延长、SKU管理更精细,工厂需要配合客户做好生产计划和库存应对,关注核心SKU的稳定供应,避免长尾产品压货。

总:欧盟关务收紧后,跨境物流服务商面临结构性调整,直发市场萎缩但海外仓和合规服务成为新增长点。

1. 行业趋势:低价值小包量降,标准申报和海外仓业务涨,中欧空运货量9月止跌。约70%货量将由海外仓承担,30%仍走直发,传统邮政小包只留3%-5%,商业快递和专线包裹将成为直发主力。

2. 客户痛点:卖家不再只比单票价格,更看重清关稳定性、时效确定性、异常处理能力和合规保障。海关数据中心将启用,低报夹带无处遁形,合规成为双向选择。

3. 解决方案:各家正在加快海外仓布局,如泛鼎夯实荷德枢纽并完善东欧南欧分仓,谷仓欧洲仓面积超120万㎡,iMile建德国末端网络并开通德国意大利互发线路,未来构建泛欧物流骨干网。服务商可围绕全链路成本优化、泛欧仓配网络、合规清关产品来获客。

总:欧盟关税新政让跨境小包直发主导欧洲的时代结束,平台需要主动筛选合规物流商、引导卖家调整经营模式。

1. 平台需求与问题:卖家直发小包成本上升,部分可能撤离欧洲,平台需要有稳定的本地仓发供给,保证履约体验。同时平台自身也面临合规风险,已有头部平台公开不与某家物流公司合作,表明平台开始用准入机制规避不稳服务商。

2. 最新做法:平台可以借鉴头部动作,建立物流服务商白名单,把合规能力列入准入标准;引导卖家接入海外仓和本地履约,提升订单时效与售后能力。

3. 运营与风向规避:物流模式正在从直发转向仓发,平台招商时需鼓励商家备货欧洲,也要防止灰清物流引发的连带风险。关注各渠道数据变化(如比利时H7降53%、H1升102%)来预警政策影响。

总:欧盟取消150欧元以下小包关税豁免,是跨境电商业态的一次重大政策实验,折射出全球贸易监管与数字商业的碰撞,也推动物流履约模式重构。

1. 产业新动向:免税红利退场触发结构性盘整,比利时低价值小包量降53%、标准申报量升102%,商品均价从5.73欧元升至10.85欧元,说明政策直接引导贸易从碎片化小包转向批量进口、本地仓配模式。

2. 商业模式变革:直发模式不会消失,但地位从主流变补充,约70%货量转向海外仓,30%仍走直发,其中传统邮政小包仅剩3%-5%。物流行业从轻资产低价竞争转向重资产、重合规、重运营,头部服务商通过干线运力和尾程资源实现逆势增长。

3. 政策与监管启示:海关数据中心即将启用,申报资料将被交叉审验,灰色清关空间被压缩。各国清关资源分散、政策传导渐进,监管趋严的溢出效应(如卖家分层迁移、服务商泛欧网络布局)值得长期观察。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

Summary: The EU has abolished the tariff exemption for imported small parcels under 150 euros, introducing a flat EUR 3 customs duty per parcel from July, with an additional processing fee of about EUR 2 planned for November. Cross-border direct small-parcel shipping costs are rising, affecting European e-commerce shopping.

1. Airfreight small-parcel volumes to Europe are clearly declining but have not collapsed, and began stabilizing in September. Customs data shows that low-value small parcels in Belgium fell 53% year-on-year, while standard-declared cargo volumes rose 102%, with the average item price rising from EUR 5.73 to EUR 10.85. This indicates that low-end, low-price products are shrinking while compliant goods are becoming more expensive.

2. Direct-shipping models have not disappeared, and some sellers still use them, but the playbook has changed: sellers are increasingly encouraging consumers to buy multiple units of the same item, using multi-item discounts to dilute the tax cost per piece. Previously the tactic was to cross-sell different products; now it is to drive repeat purchases.

3. For ordinary buyers, the duty-free benefit of low-price small parcels is over. Product prices may rise, and delivery times may depend more on overseas-warehouse fulfillment. Some direct parcels may slow down in the short term due to tighter customs clearance, but the overall logistics network has not broken down.

Summary: The EU's new tariff policy is reshaping the fulfillment and marketing logic of cross-border retail in Europe, forcing brands to redesign channel strategies and pricing.

1. On the consumer side, the duty-free advantage of low-price direct small parcels is gone, and landed costs are rising. Sellers are responding with multi-item discounts to encourage repeat purchases. Brands can adopt the same approach: shift from expanding product categories to driving repeat purchases, using same-SKU multi-item discounts to lower the per-unit tax burden and stabilize conversion.

2. Channel development: Local warehouse fulfillment is becoming mainstream, with overseas-warehouse inbound categories expanding significantly, and even light and small items now entering warehouses in bulk. Brands aiming to deepen their European presence need to build or partner with a European warehousing and distribution network, pre-position core SKUs, and ensure speed and compliance.

3. Pricing and cost: Logistics cost is no longer just about international freight; it now covers the full chain, including warehousing, trunking, in-house operations, last-mile delivery, and returns. Brands must factor in these variables when pricing, and prioritize compliance to avoid stockouts and extra costs caused by customs issues.

Summary: The EU's abolition of the low-value parcel tariff exemption has dealt a blow to the direct-shipping model in Europe, but opportunities and risks coexist. Sellers need to adjust inventory and operating strategies.

1. Policy status and risks: From July, each small parcel faces a fixed EUR 3 customs duty, with a proposed EUR 2 processing fee from November. In Belgium, low-value small-parcel clearance volumes fell 53% year-on-year, while standard import declarations rose 102%. Air cargo volumes dropped by 30% at one point, direct-shipping order volumes fell 20% in the short term, and small freight forwarders saw European business halved. Continuing to rely on low-declaration gray customs is no longer viable; sellers must become compliant.

2. Response measures: Direct shipping will not disappear entirely because of its advantages in capital efficiency and product testing. A recommended approach is tiered migration: first move core SKUs into European warehouses, then gradually expand inventory and build a regional warehousing network. Large-scale listing sellers cannot cut over immediately and may keep a portion of direct-shipping volumes.

3. Growth opportunities: Overseas-warehouse demand is exploding, with warehouse space expanding. Sellers can enter quality overseas warehouses, ship via full-container or consolidated loads, and then deliver locally to reduce costs. In marketing, sellers should shift from cross-selling to multi-item repeat-purchase discounts to amortize per-parcel tariffs. When choosing service providers, customs-clearance stability, delivery reliability, and compliance capability matter more than low freight rates.

Summary: The EU's new tariff policy is changing how Chinese factories export to Europe, requiring adjustments in production planning and product design to align with the shift in fulfillment models.

1. Changing product demand: Many light, small items previously shipped directly by mail (3C accessories, small home accessories, small textile items) are now being shipped to European overseas warehouses in bulk. Factories can optimize packaging and batch production for warehouse-stocking orders, reducing reliance on individual parcel fulfillment.

2. Business opportunities: Local warehouse fulfillment is becoming mainstream. Goods are exported in bulk via full-container or consolidated shipments and then delivered locally, meaning factories can take on larger, more stable batch orders instead of fragmented small-parcel direct shipments.

3. The logistics model is shifting from direct shipping to warehousing, which extends seller stocking cycles and requires finer SKU management. Factories need to coordinate with customers on production planning and inventory levels, ensure stable supply of core SKUs, and avoid inventory buildup on long-tail products.

Summary: As EU customs enforcement tightens, cross-border logistics service providers face structural adjustment: the direct-shipping market is shrinking, while overseas warehousing and compliance services are becoming new growth areas.

1. Industry trends: Low-value small-parcel volumes are down; standard declarations and overseas-warehouse business are up; China-Europe air cargo volumes stabilized in September. About 70% of volumes will be handled by overseas warehouses, 30% will still go direct, traditional postal small parcels will retain only 3%-5%, and commercial express and dedicated line parcels will become the main direct-shipping channels.

2. Customer pain points: Sellers are no longer comparing only per-shipment prices. They now care more about customs-clearance stability, delivery-time certainty, exception handling, and compliance assurance. With the upcoming customs data center, low-value misdeclaration and concealment will be exposed. Compliance is becoming a two-way selection.

3. Solutions: Providers are accelerating overseas-warehouse expansion. For example, Pandei is strengthening its hubs in the Netherlands and Germany and adding sub-warehouses in Eastern and Southern Europe; GuCang's European warehouse space exceeds 1.2 million square meters; iMile has built a German last-mile network and opened Germany-Italy inter-country routes, with plans for a pan-European logistics backbone. Service providers can win customers by focusing on full-chain cost optimization, pan-European warehousing and distribution networks, and compliant clearance products.

Summary: The EU's new tariff policy marks the end of an era in which cross-border small-parcel direct shipping dominated Europe. Platforms need to proactively vet logistics partners and guide sellers to adjust their operating models.

1. Platform needs and issues: As direct-shipping small-parcel costs rise, some sellers may exit Europe. Platforms need a stable local warehouse fulfillment supply to maintain the delivery experience. Platforms also face compliance risks themselves. A leading platform has already openly refused to cooperate with one logistics company, showing that platforms are using admission mechanisms to avoid unstable service providers.

2. Latest practices: Platforms can learn from these moves by establishing logistics-provider whitelists that include compliance capability as an entry standard; guiding sellers to use overseas warehouses and local fulfillment to improve delivery speed and after-sales capabilities.

3. Operations and risk avoidance: The logistics model is shifting from direct shipping to warehouse fulfillment. Platforms should encourage sellers to stock goods in Europe during merchant recruitment, while also preventing ripple risks from gray-customs logistics. Monitoring channel data changes (e.g., Belgium H7 down 53%, H1 up 102%) can serve as early warning for policy impacts.

Summary: The EU's abolition of the tariff exemption for parcels under EUR 150 is a significant policy experiment for the cross-border e-commerce industry. It reflects the collision between global trade regulation and digital commerce, and is driving a reconstruction of logistics fulfillment models.

1. New industry dynamics: The end of the duty-free dividend has triggered structural consolidation. In Belgium, low-value small-parcel volumes fell 53%, standard declarations rose 102%, and the average item value increased from EUR 5.73 to EUR 10.85. This shows that policy is directly steering trade from fragmented parcel shipping toward bulk imports and local warehousing and distribution.

2. Business model transformation: The direct-shipping model will not disappear, but its role is shifting from mainstream to supplementary. About 70% of volumes will move to overseas warehouses, while 30% will still go direct, with traditional postal parcels retaining only 3%-5%. The logistics industry is moving from asset-light, price-competitive model to an asset-heavy, compliance-heavy, operations-heavy model, and leading service providers are growing counter-cyclically through trunk-line capacity and last-mile resources.

3. Policy and regulatory implications: A customs data center is about to be launched, and declarations will be cross-checked, compressing the space for gray customs clearance. Customs clearance resources across countries are fragmented and policy transmission is gradual; the spillover effects of stricter regulation (e.g., tiered seller migration, pan-European network building by service providers) deserve long-term observation.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

跨境小包直发物流模式不会消失,但得换个活法。

文丨王昱      编辑丨何洋

【亿邦原创】“(跨境小包)直发物流主导欧区的时代结束了,但是直发物流商在欧洲远未到山穷水尽的地步。”某头部海外仓服务商的高管Howard向亿邦动力表示。

自7月1日以来,欧盟已对价值不超过150欧元的进口小包裹取消关税豁免,按照商品税则分类征收3欧元固定关税。从11月起,另一项拟议约2欧元的“小额包裹处理费”也将落地。这意味着,曾占据欧洲跨境电商半壁江山的直发小包模式,所面临的严峻考验还将升级。

“直发模式已死”、“海外仓全面取代”的言论在业内也铺天盖地。不少跨境卖家陷入焦虑,加速推进业务转型或者干脆撤离欧洲市场。

而身处风暴中心的物流服务商们,给出的反馈远比外界想象的复杂。亿邦动力与多家头部物流服务商(他们有的以直发物流为主、有的深耕海外仓及本地履约)交流后发现,他们对于“后关税时代”的判断既有共识、也有分歧。

免税红利退场后,对欧跨境电商市场经历了怎样的震荡和重构?小包直发物流还有未来吗?面对变局,跨境卖家和物流服务商们交出了怎样的答卷?

两大模式此消彼长,小型物流商加速退出

欧盟小包关税新政落地的首月,跨境物流并没有出现预想中的剧烈震荡。Howard表示,新政冲击确实存在,但与去年美国清关压力集中爆发、海关机场一度瘫痪的情况相比,这次震荡算得上比较温和。

原因之一,是欧洲跨境电商的合规环境本就比美国更严格,卖家早已适应。另一方面,美国当初的清关压力集中在洛杉矶、纽约等主要港口,而欧洲的港口和物流路径更加分散,空运、海运、卡运、铁路都能够分摊压力。

图片

有从业者指出,欧洲由多个主权国家组成,虽然政策框架趋于统一,但各国在工业基础、清关资源和履约体系集中度等方面均存在差异。因此,新政落地仍呈现出各自为战、逐步传导的特征,不太容易出现“全线告急”的情况。

尽管货流运转比较平稳,但具体的履约路径变化却开始显现:本地仓发与跨境小包直发两大模式之间,正在经历一场此消彼长的调整。

iMile观察到,进入欧洲市场的货物,不再主要以从中国直接寄出的单票小包形式流转,而是更多通过干线运输、整柜或拼柜等方式批量进口,再由欧洲本地仓库拆单,完成最后一公里配送。

随之而来的,是物流企业所处理的包裹结构日趋多元。iMile发现,一些过去较少采用本地仓发模式的品类,已经开始出现在其经手配送的包裹列表中。

泛鼎国际也注意到类似变化。其海外仓的入库品类正在调整:过去大量采用直邮模式的轻小件商品,如3C配件、家居小配饰和纺织小件,开始批量进入海外仓。其客户结构也有所变化:不少原先专注直邮铺货的卖家开始主动来咨询海外仓方案;部分存量客户则延长备货周期,从过去“少量多次补货”转向增加安全库存、拉长备货深度。

可以说,新政直接刺激了欧洲当地物流仓储的扩张势头。CBRE于7月发布的数据显示,在其欧洲调研中,75%的邮政企业、68%的第三方物流商、54%的电商企业以及35%的全渠道零售商,今年都计划扩大物流仓储面积。CBRE还点明,中国企业表现尤为积极,特别是电商企业,以往更多通过第三方物流商间接获取库容,而如今越来越多开始直接租赁仓储空间。

而与此形成反差的是,跨境小包直发类物流产品出现明显下滑。Air Cargo News数据显示,截至8月,中国至欧洲的电商空运出口货量同比下降了40%。

另以海关数据为例:比利时海关作为入欧直发包裹的主要清关路径之一,7月通过低价值简化申报(H7通道)入境的小包货物数量同比减少53%;相比而言,通过完整标准进口申报(H1通道)入境的货量却暴涨102%;伴随模式切换,商品均价也从5.73欧元升至10.85欧元,几乎翻番。类似的“一降一升”也广泛出现在荷兰、波兰、立陶宛等多个欧洲国家。

从宏观数据转向企业的真实体感,一家主营直发业务的大型物流商坦言,欧洲线路目前确实受到一定影响,短期单量下滑约20%。一些小型货代的情况更为严峻。多位从业者告诉亿邦动力,部分货代的欧洲业务量直接减少过半,只能依靠剩余的北美订单支撑,甚至已有不少客户经理离职。

不过,欧线小包直发市场的变化,并不能简单理解为市场萎缩。更准确地说,这是一场围绕服务能力和行业门槛展开的“结构性盘整”。

不少物流业人士都指出,市场总量有所调整,但真正具备履约能力和合规实力的服务商,成为卖家的首选。与此同时,大量小型服务商选择退出——因为行业门槛正在水涨船高。跨境物流逐渐变为一个重资产、重合规、重运营的行业。过去靠低价和灰清维系的空间,在政策和市场的双重力量下不断压缩。

这种“顶端虹吸”效应,让头部直发服务商的跌幅更加可控、恢复更快,甚至能够对冲总量的下行的压力,完成逆势增长。例如,云途物流的欧线业务就呈现出增长态势。据悉,过去几年,该公司持续投入飞机运力、转运团队和尾程资源,这些积累在新政落地后已经开始显现出实际效应、逐步兑现为业务利好。

跨境小包直发物流“基本盘”仍在,但玩法变了

对欧小包直发物流模式的寒冬会持续多久,不同物流服务商的判断并不完全一致。一家主营直发业务的大型物流商告诉亿邦动力,他们认为市场大约在第四季度就能逐步恢复,年内基本可以收复失地。也有服务商认为,市场要完整消化这轮政策变化大约需要12至18个月。

一个共识是:直发物流模式绝不会因新关税而消失。

它最直接的优势,一是资金效率,卖家无需提前把货备到欧洲仓,可以减少库存资金占用;二是品类灵活性,新品测款、长尾商品试销、季节性爆品,都可以通过直发快速启。因此,它虽然不再是适用于大多数商品的主流履约方式,但仍会成为部分场景下的重要补充方案,甚至是最具性价比的方案。

另一方面,直发业务的“基本盘客群”短期内存量依旧可观。

iMile指出,近期确实有一部分原本采用“中国直发欧洲”模式的卖家开始咨询海外仓和履约服务。但从直发迁移到海外仓,需要重新考虑库存投入、SKU管理、库存周转以及退货处理,卖家很难在短时间内完成全部调整。更可能出现的是分层迁移:第一步,先把核心SKU放进欧洲仓;第二步,根据实际动销逐步扩大库存;第三步,再进一步建立区域仓配网络。

图片

Howard也观察到类似趋势。其判断是,直发业务对于那些拥有几十万乃至上百万直发SKU的传统铺货大卖而言,是一种无法马上切割的路径依赖。

“壮士断腕是风险很大的,不可能一下子就把份额全都押注到仓发上——哪怕仅仅把20%的直发SKU转为海外备货,所需占用的资金盘都大得吓人,很容易一下就把脆弱的现金流击穿,‘薄利多销、广撒网博概率’的选品算法也会失效。”他谈道。

与此同时,当前空运成本和人力成本也在同步下降。因此,关税的影响虽不可忽视,但并非没有对冲空间。

作为跨境电商高度依赖的运输方式,中欧空运数据的浮动是说明当下直发模式市场形势最直观的数据之一。据WorldACD最新调研,7月新政落地后,相关航线的货量受到明显冲击,8月仍处于收缩状态。不过进入9月,周度数据已开始出现“止跌筑底”迹象:

今年8月,香港至欧洲的航空货运量同比下降30%,较新规实施前的6月低了24%;但从周度数据来看,8月最后一周,香港至欧洲航线货量环比回升3%,较两周前的最低点增长了6%;中国内地至欧洲航线的货量也脱离下行轨道,连续4周环比小幅回升,缓慢恢复元气。

视角从行业大盘切换到个体卖家,也能发现有不少人坚守直发模式,只不过打法有所变化。

据亿邦动力观察,过去,卖家们常用的营销策略是鼓励消费者“买A的同时搭配B”(跨品类组合购买),但在新政环境下,会更多地鼓励消费者对同一单品进行复购,比如三件同HS Code(海关商品编码)下的不同规格产品,这样三件商品只收3欧,单件仅承担1欧的税。如果进行搭配销售,则通过“第二件X折、第三件X折”等方式给予折扣的同时,仍保持合理的利润空间。

这意味着营销逻辑的转变:从“扩品类”转向“促复购”,用多件折扣引导消费者增加单次订单的购买数量,从而在保持直发灵活性的同时,有效摊薄单件成本。

综合各种因素考量,一家主营直发业务的大型物流商估测,未来,一个比较合理的格局是:约70%的货量由海外仓承担、剩余30%继续通过直发完成。但直发货量硕果仅存的这“三成”中,传统邮政小包最终可能只留下3%-5%的份额,大部分存量转由商业快递、专线包裹接手。原因在于,后者的合规性、清关效率和时效性都更佳,且利润水平也高于邮政小包。

低价重要性下降,合规能力、全链成本成新赛点

洗牌过后,仍留在场内的欧区卖家选择服务商的标准也在发生变化:单纯低运价不再拥有“一票通过权”。

“过去很多卖家选择服务商时,标准相对单一,首先看单票价格。但当前环境下,只比较价格、不评估整体履约能力,可能会成为一种短视选择。”戚杰一位从业者指出,清关稳定性、时效确定性、异常处理能力、合规保障水平——这些才是决定供应链是否能持续稳定运转的关键。

新政发布后,灰清玩法被扫地出局,合规稳定性成为跨境物流行业的硬通货。

而平台动作已经释放出信号。此前,已有头部跨境平台曾公开表示不与某家物流公司合作,这意味着平台层面已开始主动筛选合规、稳定的物流服务商。

泛鼎国际也指出,欧盟关务合规的全面收紧不是“短期突击”,是“新的常态”。

除了税则归类的容错空间明显收窄,更重要的是海关数据中心即将启用,在对电商订单、物流信息与申报资料的交叉审验下,低报、夹带、冲关等手段无从遁形。

“必须认识到合规是个双向选择的机制。”Howard表示,“你要是一个合规卖家,就必须也选择一个合规服务商,因为它也会反向筛选合规客户,避免一盘货违规、整条柜被扣。”

不过,“低运价不是首要问题”,并不意味着卖家对成本的关注程度下降。事实上,随着仓发比例提升,这个问题反而愈发复杂。卖家考量成本的视角,已从单一的头程运价延伸至更广阔的全链路,诸多变量开始左右决策。例如,仓库区位(如是否靠近消费者所在地)的重要性开始上升。

“过去大家更多关注仓库租金,现在考虑的是一个综合账:仓储成本+干线成本+库内操作成本+最后一公里成本+配送时效+退货成本。”iMile向亿邦动力表示。

另一方面,海外仓网是否健全,也成为行业竞争的焦点。

各家海外仓服务商今年都在加快布局,例如:泛鼎国际正在夯实荷兰、德国等核心枢纽仓,同时完善东欧、南欧区域分仓网络;谷仓的欧洲仓群面积超过120万㎡,同比暴增71%,从传统英法德“铁三角”向中欧、南欧、东欧一路铺展,横跨15国;iMile则在完成德国末端网络布局后,启动了德国与意大利两国之间的互发线路,未来还将逐步将西、匈、波纳入末端网络体系,旨在打造一张“泛欧物流骨干网”。

亿邦持续追踪报道该情报,如想了解更多与本文相关信息,请扫码关注作者微信。

本文首发于 亿邦动力 官方网站

文章来源:亿邦动力

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

欧盟取消150欧元以下小包关税豁免的具体内容是什么?

欧盟对价值不超过150欧元的进口小包裹取消关税豁免,按商品税则分类征收3欧元固定关税;从11月起拟再征收约2欧元“小额包裹处理费”。这使跨境直发小包的成本明显上升,推动了欧洲跨境电商履约模式从直发向海外仓调整。

欧盟关税新政对跨境直发物流有什么影响?

新政导致中国至欧洲电商空运出口货量同比下降40%(截至8月);比利时H7低价值通道小包数量同比减少53%,H1标准申报货量增长102%。主营直发的大型物流商短期单量下滑约20%,部分小型货代欧洲业务减少过半;海外仓发货模式则同步上升,形成此消彼长。

欧盟关税新政后,小包直发模式会被海外仓完全取代吗?

不会完全取代。直发模式仍有资金效率高、品类灵活等优势,适合新品测款、长尾商品和季节性爆品。未来预计约70%货量由海外仓承担,30%继续直发;其中传统邮政小包可能仅剩3%-5%份额,大部分由商业快递和专线包裹承接。

欧盟关税新政后,跨境卖家如何降低直发小包成本?

卖家可调整营销策略,从“扩品类”转向“促复购”,鼓励消费者购买同HS Code下的多件单品,利用单次订单只收3欧元关税的规则摊薄税负;同时可分层迁移核心SKU至海外仓,保留直发灵活性并降低库存风险。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

赞 +1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0