广告
加载中

中国茶饮 别再道歉了

山核桃 2026-07-15 13:53
山核桃 2026/07/15 13:53

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文梳理了当前中国新茶饮行业的发展现状和核心问题,干货要点如下:

1. 行业整体情况:2025年是新茶饮上市元年,蜜雪冰城等四大新茶饮品牌集中上市,但仅一年后估值普遍回调,多数巨头市值大幅缩水,比如蜜雪冰城市值较高点跌去七成,奈雪的茶沦为仙股被小股东炮轰,行业整体进入转型关键期。

2. 当前行业的特殊现象:各大茶饮巨头扎堆道歉,道歉原因涵盖食品安全问题、联名断货、出海加盟商矛盾、股价下跌等,不少品牌将道歉转化为营销套路获取流量,但频繁道歉本质是行业进入存量肉搏竞争的信号。

3. 行业核心矛盾:过往行业信奉规模扩张+加盟的模式,达成万店目标后暴露出诸多问题,旧经验无法解决新问题,行业急需探索新的增长路径。

本文分析了中国新茶饮行业的现存矛盾与发展趋势,对茶饮品牌经营有诸多参考价值,核心干货如下:

1. 营销层面:道歉式营销虽然可以短期获取流量,但频繁使用说明行业已经进入存量竞争阶段,长期依赖流量套路会掩盖真正的增长问题,不利于品牌长期发展。

2. 渠道扩张层面:过往走加盟万店规模扩张的模式已经暴露出明显弊端,超级加盟商与品牌的矛盾、普通夫妻店盈利难度提升,强监管反而会激化矛盾,品牌需要重新平衡品牌与不同类型加盟商的利益分配。

3. 战略层面:当前行业已经从高速增长进入价值转型阶段,多品牌多品类扩张容易引发内耗,外卖大战也会挤压品牌利润,过往模仿麦当劳、星巴克等海外品牌的旧经验已经不适用,品牌需要从自身出发探索适合中国市场的新增长路径。

本文梳理了新茶饮行业的现状与风险机会,对进入或已经在茶饮行业的开店卖家有较强的参考意义,核心干货如下:

1. 行业整体趋势:2025年新茶饮集中上市后,行业已经结束高速增长阶段,进入存量竞争的转型期,卖家需要对行业形势有清晰认知,不要盲目跟风开店。

2. 风险提示:头部品牌万店扩张带来门店密度提升,优质点位资源稀缺,多数品牌都有优先照顾老加盟商、超级加盟商的政策,普通新进入的小卖家竞争压力极大;同时品牌高频上新、设备升级都会转嫁成本,品牌加码监管后违规罚款、闭店的风险也明显提升。

3. 机会提示:当前行业处于旧模式崩塌新模式探索的转型期,大量新品牌正在崛起,小卖家可以优先评估品牌的加盟商政策,选择利益分配更合理的新兴品牌,规避头部品牌的激烈竞争,抓住转型期的创业机会。

本文分析了新茶饮行业的阶段变化,给茶饮供应链相关工厂带来诸多启示,核心干货如下:

1. 产品生产需求变化:新茶饮已经从规模扩张转向价值转型,头部品牌普遍推进多品类、多品牌布局,对供应链提出了更高要求,需要供应链能够支撑多品类运营、不同品牌的供应链区隔,对柔性生产能力的需求明显提升。

2. 商业机会:头部万店茶饮品牌已经完成自身供应链基建,掌握了源头话语权,中小供应工厂可以抓住当前行业转型的窗口,对接正在探索新增长模式的新兴茶饮品牌,抓住品牌重构供应链体系的发展机会;同时也可以针对中小加盟商对低成本设备原料的需求,开发高性价比的适配产品。

3. 转型启示:新茶饮行业的增长逻辑已经改变,供应链工厂需要加快推进数字化升级,适配品牌方对成本管控、灵活供应的新需求,提升自身的行业竞争力。

本文梳理了新茶饮行业转型期的痛点与趋势,为服务茶饮行业的服务商指明了业务方向,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:中国新茶饮已经结束高速规模扩张,进入价值转型的关键阶段,存量竞争下品牌方和加盟商都产生了大量新的服务需求,服务商可以抓住行业转型的红利拓展业务。

2. 核心客户痛点:品牌端的核心痛点是平衡不同层级加盟商的关系、多品牌多品类运营管理、重构单店盈利模型、上市后的市值管理;加盟商端的痛点是优质点位获取、开店成本控制、门店运营能力提升。

3. 业务拓展方向:服务商可以针对性开发对应产品,比如面向品牌推出加盟商关系管理咨询、数字化门店稽查系统、转型战略咨询服务;面向中小加盟商推出低成本开店培训、优质点位对接服务,匹配当前行业的需求,获取新的增长空间。

本文分析了新茶饮行业与平台合作中的核心问题,对布局茶饮业务的平台商有诸多参考,核心干货如下:

1. 当前合作存在的问题:此前平台发起的外卖大战,虽然依靠茶饮品牌获得了大量流量,但实际上挤压了茶饮品牌的利润空间,导致品牌实收率大幅下降,已经引发众多品牌的抵触,不少品牌开始调整战略修补单店模型,对平台的高抽成模式不满。

2. 平台优化方向:平台需要调整和茶饮品牌的利益分配机制,平衡平台流量收益和品牌盈利需求,才能维持长期稳定的合作,避免品牌出走。

3. 运营与风险规避:当前新茶饮行业转型,大量新兴品牌有扩张拓客需求,平台可以针对性推出扶持政策吸引新兴品牌入驻,同时要规避头部品牌增长放缓带来的流量下滑风险,搭建高中低梯度的品牌矩阵,丰富平台茶饮品类供给,稳定平台流量。

本文剖析了中国新茶饮行业发展的最新动向和核心问题,对产业研究有较高的价值,核心干货如下:

1. 产业最新动向:2025年蜜雪冰城、古茗等四大新茶饮品牌集中上市,这一年被称为新茶饮上市元年,上市仅一年后行业估值普遍回调,摩根大通判断头部品牌高速增长已经接近尾声,行业整体进入从规模增长向价值转型的新阶段,行业集体兴起的道歉风潮本质是路径依赖下的行业集体焦虑。

2. 行业新浮现的核心问题:过往行业信奉加盟规模扩张做万店的旧模式,暴露出多重深层问题:超级加盟商和品牌的利益矛盾、中小加盟商盈利空间收窄、多品牌多品类扩张引发内部资源内耗、外卖大战挤压行业整体利润,过往模仿海外连锁、头部同行的旧经验无法解决新问题。

3. 值得深入研究的新方向:未来中国新茶饮如何从模仿者转变为行业定义者,探索符合中国市场特征的新茶饮商业模式,万店规模下加盟体系的利益平衡机制,都是值得深入研究的新课题。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines the current development status and core issues of China's modern tea beverage industry, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Overall industry landscape: 2025 marked the "IPO Year" for China's modern tea beverage sector, when four leading brands including Mixue Ice City went public in a wave. Just one year later, however, valuations have broadly corrected, and most giants have seen steep market value declines. Mixue Ice City, for example, has lost 70% of its market capitalization from its peak, while Nayuki has become a penny stock and faced public criticism from minority shareholders. The industry as a whole has entered a critical transition period.

2. A distinct new industry phenomenon: Major tea beverage giants have issued public apologies in clusters, over issues ranging from food safety scandals, sold-out co-branded products, conflicts with overseas franchisees to poor stock performance. Many brands have turned apologies into a marketing gimmick to drive traffic, but the frequent apology trend is essentially a signal that the industry has entered cut-throat competition in a saturated, stock-based market.

3. Core industry contradiction: For years, the industry has relied on a growth model of scale expansion via franchising. Now that many brands have hit their 10,000-store targets, a host of problems have emerged. Old playbooks no longer work for new challenges, and the industry urgently needs to explore new growth paths.

This article analyzes existing contradictions and development trends of China's modern tea beverage industry, offering actionable insights for tea beverage brand operators. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Marketing takeaway: While apology-based marketing can drive short-term traffic, its frequent use indicates the sector has entered a stage of saturated stock competition. Long-term reliance on traffic gimmicks will cover up underlying growth problems and harm long-term brand development.

2. Channel expansion takeaway: The traditional model of building a 10,000-store franchise network has exposed clear flaws: conflicts between super franchisees and brands, rising profitability pressure for small mom-and-pop franchise stores, and stricter regulation that has only exacerbated tensions. Brands need to rebalance profit sharing between the brand and different types of franchisees.

3. Strategic takeaway: The industry has shifted from high-speed growth to value-focused transformation. Multi-brand and multi-category expansion tends to cause internal friction, and the food delivery price war has squeezed brand margins. Old strategies of copying overseas players like McDonald's and Starbucks are no longer effective, and brands need to develop new growth paths tailored to the Chinese market from the ground up.

This article outlines the current status, risks and opportunities in the modern tea beverage industry, offering strong reference value for sellers entering or already operating in the space. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Overall industry trend: After the wave of IPOs in 2025, the era of high-speed growth has ended, and the sector has entered a transition period of saturated stock competition. Sellers need to have a clear understanding of the industry landscape and avoid opening new stores blindly following trends.

2. Risk warnings: The 10,000-store expansion of leading brands has driven up store density and made high-quality locations increasingly scarce. Most brands prioritize existing and super franchisees when allocating resources, putting new small independent sellers under enormous competitive pressure. At the same time, brands' frequent new product launches and equipment upgrades pass costs onto franchisees, and stricter brand compliance checks have significantly increased the risk of fines and store closures.

3. Opportunity insights: The industry is in transition as old models collapse and new models are being explored, with a large number of new brands emerging. Small sellers should prioritize evaluating a brand's franchise policies, choose emerging brands with more reasonable profit sharing structures, avoid the cut-throat competition surrounding leading brands, and seize entrepreneurial opportunities during this transition period.

This article analyzes the phase shift in the modern tea beverage industry, offering key insights for supply chain factories serving the sector. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Shifts in production demand: Modern tea beverage brands have shifted from scale expansion to value-focused transformation, with leading brands increasingly pursuing multi-category and multi-brand layouts. This has raised higher requirements for supply chains, which now need to support multi-category operations and supply chain separation for different brands, driving sharply higher demand for flexible production capacity.

2. New business opportunities: Leading 10,000-store tea brands have already built their own in-house supply chain infrastructure and control upstream pricing power. Small and mid-sized supply factories can leverage the current industry transition window to partner with emerging tea brands that are exploring new growth models, and capture opportunities created as brands rebuild their supply chain systems. They can also develop cost-effective products tailored to meet small and mid-sized franchisees' demand for low-cost equipment and raw materials.

3. Transition insights: The growth logic of the modern tea beverage industry has changed. Supply chain factories need to accelerate digital upgrades to adapt to brands' new requirements for cost control and flexible supply, and improve their core competitiveness in the industry.

This article outlines the pain points and trends of the modern tea beverage industry during its transition, pointing out new business directions for service providers serving the sector. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trend: China's modern tea beverage industry has ended its period of rapid scale expansion and entered a critical stage of value-focused transformation. Amid saturated stock competition, both brands and franchisees have generated a large number of new service demands, and service providers can capture dividends from the industry transition to expand their business.

2. Core customer pain points: For brands, core pain points include balancing relationships between different tiers of franchisees, managing multi-brand and multi-category operations, rebuilding single-store profitability models, and post-IPO market value management. For franchisees, core pain points include accessing high-quality locations, controlling opening costs, and improving store operation capabilities.

3. Business expansion directions: Service providers can develop targeted products: for example, launch franchise relationship management consulting, digital store inspection systems, and transition strategy consulting for brands; and offer low-cost opening training and high-quality location matching services for small and mid-sized franchisees. This will align with current industry demand and open up new growth space.

This article analyzes core issues in collaboration between modern tea beverage brands and platforms, offering key reference for platforms expanding into the tea beverage business. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Existing problems in collaboration: Previous food delivery price wars launched by platforms drove massive traffic growth with the help of tea beverage brands, but they also significantly squeezed tea brands' profit margins and led to sharp drops in brands' net revenue per order. This has sparked widespread pushback from brands, many of which have adjusted their strategies to repair single-store profitability models and voiced discontent with platforms' high commission model.

2. Platform optimization direction: Platforms need to adjust their profit sharing mechanism with tea beverage brands, balancing platform traffic revenue with brands' profitability needs, to maintain long-term stable cooperation and prevent brands from leaving the platform.

3. Operations and risk mitigation: Amid the current industry transition, a large number of emerging tea brands have demand for expansion and customer acquisition. Platforms can launch targeted support policies to attract these emerging brands to settle on their platforms, while mitigating the risk of traffic decline caused by slowing growth among leading brands. By building a tiered brand matrix covering high, medium and low price points, platforms can enrich their tea beverage offerings and stabilize overall traffic.

This article dissects the latest developments and core issues in China's modern tea beverage industry, offering high value for industrial research. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Latest industry developments: In 2025, four leading modern tea beverage brands including Mixue Ice City and Guming went public in a concentrated wave, making 2025 the industry's "IPO Year". Just one year later, industry valuations have broadly corrected. JPMorgan has judged that the high-growth era for leading brands is drawing to a close, and the industry as a whole has entered a new phase of transition from scale growth to value creation. The industry-wide apology wave is essentially a reflection of collective industry anxiety born of path dependence.

2. Newly emerged core industry problems: The old industry playbook of franchise-based scale expansion to reach 10,000 stores has exposed multiple deep-seated problems: interest conflicts between super franchisees and brands, narrowing profit margins for small and mid-sized franchisees, internal resource friction from multi-brand and multi-category expansion, and industry-wide profit pressure from food delivery price wars. Old strategies of copying overseas chain models and leading industry peers can no longer solve these new problems.

3. New directions for further research: Two topics stand out as particularly worthy of in-depth research going forward: how Chinese modern tea beverage brands can transition from followers to industry definers, and develop new business models aligned with the characteristics of the Chinese market; and how to build a balanced interest distribution mechanism for franchise systems operating at the 10,000-store scale.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

几乎所有消费股的命运,都有“上市前拿着钱投不进、上了市杀估值”的时刻。

中国的茶饮巨头也一样。2025年,顶着“新茶饮四小龙”的蜜雪冰城(02097.HK)、古茗(01364.HK)、霸王茶姬(CHA.US)和沪上阿姨(02589.HK)相继上市,这一年也被称为新茶饮的上市元年。

很多机构后来回忆错过这些当红辣子鸡的痛苦,拿着它们的成长模型寻找下一个蜜雪冰城、古茗。

挤破脑袋投中的人形容自己的运气,转头向媒体高谈阔论,比如如何接近蜜雪冰城的张氏兄弟、如何押中霸王茶姬创始人张俊杰。

现在来看,在那个消费股重燃的时刻,这些新茶饮标的或许都被神化了。

因为仅一年之后,估值回调成为大多数玩家的常态。

以蜜雪冰城为例,距曾经2300亿港元市值高点已跌去七成,先一步上市、沦为“仙股”的奈雪的茶在股东大会直接被小股东炮轰。

近乎一致的,新茶饮的高管们也都开始反思道歉,向市场谈及自身的短板,但事实上这股“道歉文学”早就被深谙流量套路的新茶饮玩得风生水起。

频繁道歉和反思背后,是对新茶饮巨头路径依赖的集体考验,这群最勤奋、最聪明的玩家,正站在变革的关键十字路口。

过去一年,除了频繁因宕机、涨价而道歉的AI玩家们,茶饮巨头们可以说是将“道歉”这门显学,发挥到极致的第二大玩家。

茶饮巨头们的“道歉文学”,也五花八门。

有为食品安全道歉的。比如因“隔夜柠檬”事件登上热搜的蜜雪冰城,近期因门店使用过期食材、三无茶叶的“奶茶白月光”1点点。

整改思路也是一致:道歉、整改、闭店,然后接着再犯,有网友吐槽茶饮的食安问题像个“渣男”:不主动、不拒绝、不负责。

有为联名断货道歉的。

通常的基本操作是“官宣合作—消费者定闹钟抢联名——门店爆单”,品牌话术也是自我检讨备货不足,再加一句“我们没想到这么火”。

还有给海外消费者和加盟商道歉的。

2026年初,蜜雪冰城就遭到越南本地加盟商的维权;这几天和LV对簿公堂的茉莉奶白,也因与纽约加盟商关系破裂,陷入出海风波。

甚至还有为股价跌跌不休而道歉的。

此前因股东大会上热搜的奈雪的茶就被股东质疑“创始人能不能只拿1元年薪?”“为什么不做市值管理?”

当然,茶饮高管也会主动道歉,把电话会开成反思会,蜜雪冰城的新任CEO张渊就在电话会上直言外卖大战让公司“暴露出了很多方面的不足”。

茶饮巨头们擅长“道歉”,也会利用道歉,将道歉文学转化为流量。

典型案例就是被网友们戏称为“塌房界清流”的“雪王”,即便是被315曝光存在隔夜柠檬等问题,但却因平价引发网友们的集体护短,害怕穷鬼专属的“4块钱的白月光”就此下架。

还有每逢联名上新、外卖大战里的“底层打工人命苦”经典名场面——订单多如雪花、抢联名的外卖骑手以及根本来不及摇奶茶的底层员工。

每次联名每次崩、每次上新每次缺货,网友甚至怀疑自己也是茶饮巨头竞争play里的一环。

此类道歉式营销,事实上在消费电子圈、互联网圈早已不新鲜,但当一个行业还是频繁道歉,往往是陷入存量肉搏的开端。

摩根大通对蜜雪冰城的一句判断更狠:“高速增长已接近尾声,蜜雪将进入从增长向价值转型的阶段。”

当一门苦生意开始尝到道歉的甜,真正吊诡之处在于,它掩盖了中国茶饮狂奔之后的一个根本问题:

路径依赖。

和互联网巨头们对“超级入口”的迷恋一样,中国茶饮玩家过去信奉的一个关键准则是:

规模。

对中国茶饮玩家来说,判断这个市场很大,过去有两个关于“规模”的参照标准:

第一,近乎完美的消费市场。

分析师和创始人谈到现制茶饮的“大”,都会和欧美日韩对比,从人均杯量谈到咖啡奶茶的成瘾性,再反手叠加展望中国消费市场的分层,现制茶饮的门店规模扩张自然未来可期。

第二,近乎完美的商业模式。

你也很难找到像现制茶饮这样完美的商业模式——加盟。

茶饮总部们不卖奶茶,卖的是设备、原料,收的是加盟管理费,它们的扩张依赖成千上万有着开店梦的中国老板。

甚至和连锁餐饮上市品牌相比,现制饮品的加盟化程度也是遥遥领先。国信证券的调研数据显示,当前头部现制饮品上市公司中有较多品牌加盟店占比已超90%。

两重规模定论下,大多茶饮巨头的首要梦想就是万店,分析师们也认为,万店是中国茶饮迈向持续增长的一个关键转折点。

这点也并不难理解。

第一,万店意味着触达更多的消费者,带来的规模效应,能均摊成本;第二,万店的基础也是供应链基建,本质是抓住源头的话语权。

一通狂奔,茶饮巨头加速跨过万店,但却忽视了万店甜蜜的代价。

暴击“雪王们”的第一根大棒,就来自万店的诅咒。

第一,中国茶饮们忽视了愈演愈烈的内部矛盾。

加盟商群体中的中国特色产物“超级加盟商”、小加盟商个体夫妻店和品牌间的矛盾。

蜜雪冰城创始人张红超曾说过:“蜜雪冰城要联合全中国想当老板的人,打造贩卖快乐的基础设施”。

类似的表述也出现在古茗创始人王云安口中。王云安曾说,古茗早期加盟以“屌丝”为主,一类是想自己干的打工人,第二类做着不太成功的小本生意的老板。

这些超级加盟商既是茶饮连锁行业里的职业化投资者,也是最早一批跟着蜜雪和古茗打天下的人。

现制茶饮也在招股书和财报中披露出类似的指标——比如平均每个加盟商经营几家门店,占比超几成的加盟商经营两家或以上加盟店,用“开了一家还想再开”来形容奶茶加盟生意有多赚钱。

但超级加盟商和品牌的蜜月期并不长,转折点就是增长出现下滑。

在激烈竞争中,压力山大的品牌往往掌控力会更强,这一点在过去一年茶饮行业加码督查力度就能看出。

从出品、卫生、操作流程到着装话术,区域经理和稽查都会检查,扣分不仅会被罚款,出现0分甚至直接闭店重新去总部学习。

不少品牌对表现不佳的门店也会进行回购,但如果收购价格过低,也会遭到加盟商的抗拒。

因此,强监管并不是支撑增长的必要条件,一旦与品牌关系僵化,手握十几家的“区域诸侯”们就会投身新的品牌,他们是对市场水温变化最敏感的人。

而对加盟夫妻店而言,赚到钱的难度就更大了。

一面是争不过直营、超级加盟商,门店加密下,好的点位就这么多。

一些夫妻店创业者被劝退的原因,很多是“今天提交点位被拒绝,但后天同样的点位就被同行抢走”,部分茶饮品牌内部也有“优先老加盟商”的政策。

另一面,茶饮高频上新带来的成本上升,对夫妻店来说,守店的成本也在急剧增加。

蜜雪冰城“上咖啡机”就曾遭到部分普通加盟商的抗拒,原因是“设备太贵”“店铺没有咖啡需求”。

茶饮巨头们没有想到的是,一通操作猛如虎,非但没有带着加盟商赚钱,反而一批连锁咖啡、奶茶成为勇哥直播间的“中产破产四件套”,如何平衡加盟商的内部矛盾,这是它们过去没有想到的难题。

第二,中国茶饮们忽视了多元化带来的内耗。

当主品牌扩张、单品类扩张受阻,多品类、多品牌运营的跨界,也成了中国茶饮的“救命稻草”。

“搞副业”本质是供应链能力和品牌运营能力的延伸,其目的无外乎两件事:开更多的店和提升单店营收,这本是一件“量价齐升”的美事。

叠加中国咖啡和奶茶的边界本就模糊,茶饮玩家的供应链又可以复用。

但不是所有的品类都可以跨,也不是所有的品牌都具备多品牌运营的能力,从品牌定位、供应链区隔到加盟商利益分配,每一环都是严峻考验。

加盟商结构、多元化两大内耗尚未解决,平台外卖大战又直接外耗了茶饮玩家的竞争,表面是加速线上化,实则是茶饮来引流。

匆忙应战的茶饮玩家回头来才发现,自己才是炮灰,变成给平台打工,实收率大幅降低下,重新掉头修补单店模型。

后来蜜雪冰城新帅张渊反思外卖大战,说了一句“晴天修屋顶”的中式哲学。

但他没说的是,茶饮玩家的晴天要比想象中过去的快得多。

十几年前,一位知名连锁业学者办了个培训班,培训班里的很多学员,如王云安、张红甫、王霄锟、彭心等,后来都成为了中国茶饮的代表人物。

那时,课堂里他们学习的对象是在中国玩转特许经营的“麦当劳们”。

今天,头部茶饮巨头都有自己的培训中心,郑州的蜜雪大学总部不仅供加盟商学,也开放给外部企业,来自全国各地的中国老板前来拜读这群茶饮玩家的方法论。

茶饮巨头的创始人们也是最爱学习的一批人。

麦当劳、肯德基们是中国茶饮的首批学习对象,在它们身上,中国茶饮学到了连锁经营的扩张法则,后来一批有着类似管理经验的职业经理人也来到了茶饮圈。

后来,茶饮玩家们逐渐长出服务和体验的意识,星巴克、海底捞都是茶饮玩家高频提到过的学习对象。

2016年,蜜雪冰城创始人之一张红甫曾发朋友圈称,在餐饮行业,他最钦佩的是海底捞。

星巴克也近乎一夜之间成了所有高端茶饮品牌共同的老师,奈雪的茶、喜茶、霸王茶姬都曾对其经验进行学习。

后来,他们越变越大,开始学习如何管理一个更大规模的公司,是更抽象的命题。

霸王茶姬创始人张俊杰在内部曾推崇华为的狼性文化,要求每个员工“必须兼具匪气和文气、猴气和虎气。”虎气是指敢作敢为,猴气指的是机敏灵活,他希望一个组织具备多种特质。

他们不仅向别人学,也互相学。

古茗创始人王云安在晚点采访中曾谈及对吕良、张红甫和neo的赞赏,他们分别创立了茶颜悦色、蜜雪冰城和喜茶。

我们了解到,茶饮之中高管和员工互相跳槽的现象也很普遍,人员的流动一定程度上也是今天茶饮互相学习的原因之一。

为什么“爱道歉”背后,是茶饮品牌至今没说出的那个“房间里的大象”。

当市面上所有玩家都学了一遍,前朝的剑难斩本朝的官,旧经验难以解决新问题。

这也是为什么在奈雪的股东大会上,小股东也可以拿着同行的解决方案和高管battle,他们质疑的其实不是“你为什么没增长”,而是“为什么同行做的你还没做”。

人很难赚认知以外的钱,奈雪的股东一样,中国茶饮也一样。

当新茶饮不再“新”,如何将自己作为方法,从模仿者成为真正的定义者,这才是今天中国茶饮未来必须走的路。

参考资料:

1、晚点:晚点对话古茗王云安:得三四线者得天下、霸王茶姬:从学所有人到被所有人学

注:文/山核桃,文章来源:财经无忌(公众号ID:caijwj),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:财经无忌

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

新茶饮品牌上市后普遍遇到了哪些困境?

2025年是新茶饮上市元年,蜜雪冰城、古茗等头部品牌上市一年后普遍出现估值回调,同时面临食品安全、联名缺货、加盟商纠纷、股价下跌等问题,核心根源在于过往规模扩张的路径依赖已不适配新的行业阶段。

新茶饮加盟模式有哪些待解决的矛盾?

当前头部现制饮品上市公司加盟店占比普遍超90%,品牌扩张高度依赖加盟模式,增长见顶后品牌强监管政策与超级加盟商、中小夫妻店加盟商的利益冲突凸显,叠加点位竞争、上新成本上升,普通加盟商盈利难度大幅提升。

新茶饮品牌为什么频繁发布道歉声明?

新茶饮品牌道歉的原因覆盖食品安全问题、联名备货不足、加盟商纠纷、股价下跌等多个方面,部分品牌会将道歉转化为流量营销手段,本质是行业进入存量竞争阶段,过往增长模式暴露短板后的应对举措。

新茶饮行业未来要怎么实现可持续发展?

新茶饮行业过往靠规模扩张、效仿海外连锁品牌的旧经验已难以破解增长瓶颈,需摆脱路径依赖,结合自身业务实际探索本土化发展路径,从模式模仿者成长为行业规则的定义者。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0