广告
加载中

用颗“鸵鸟蛋” 一盘番茄炒蛋就敢卖520?

专注餐饮供应链的 2026-07-13 12:43
专注餐饮供应链的 2026/07/13 12:43

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心揭露了上海某餐厅520元鸸鹋蛋番茄炒蛋的溢价真相,给普通消费者外出就餐,尤其是打卡高端网红餐饮提供了避雷参考

1. 拆解了这道菜的真实成本:鸸鹋蛋国内河南、海南等地已经规模化养殖,属于流通稀缺而非资源稀缺,批量采购价150-200元/颗;普罗旺斯番茄国内山东、陕西早已大规模引种,餐饮渠道批量拿货仅4-6元/斤,就算全用进口番茄,单份成本也仅50元,商家所谓200元成本,是把自身备货损耗、周转低效的成本全摊给了消费者

2. 给消费者的提醒:这类靠小众猎奇食材打造的高端网红菜,大多只有食材噱头,烹饪工艺、口味和家常菜没有区别,吸引的都是一次性打卡的消费者,这类餐厅大多火不过一年,消费时不要为了社交展示欲交智商税,要关注口味和性价比

本文分析了当前国内高端餐饮行业的发展现状和趋势,给餐饮品牌商的品牌运营、产品研发提供了明确参考

1. 当前消费趋势变化:高端餐饮消费者越来越理性,开始看重性价比,就连黑珍珠餐厅都纷纷上线团购套餐,下调人均客单价,消费场景从商务宴请逐步转向家庭消费,消费者会追问菜品价格背后的真实价值,靠信息差抬价的模式已经行不通

2. 品牌营销的误区:不要将小众猎奇食材当成打造差异化溢价的万能药,这类食材只能带来一次性的猎奇流量,没有复购根基,还存在供应链不稳定、合规风险高的问题,多数靠此起家的网红店都逃不过三月爆红、半年熄火、一年闭店的宿命

3. 正确的产品研发方向:差异化不能只靠换冷门食材,要打磨工艺沉淀品牌,小众食材只能作为菜品风味的附加值,不能当成天价主打菜博眼球,要让食材服务于菜品口味,而非单纯靠稀有性抬价

本文梳理了当前餐饮赛道的发展变化,给餐饮经营者点明了需要注意的风险和可把握的机会

1. 风险提示:靠小众猎奇食材打造高端溢价的模式不可持续,猎奇需求本身是一次性的,消费者打卡后就不会复购,加上高端餐饮客群本身狭窄,很容易陷入客流断崖式下跌;同时小众食材供应链没有标准化,产能不稳定,很多冷门食材处于监管灰色地带,容易触发合规问题,导致门店停业

2. 机会提示:当前高端餐饮正在向亲民化、务实化转型,高端餐厅推出团购套餐、下调人均,拓展家庭消费场景的增长速度很快,上海黑珍珠餐厅的团购套餐订单量月均同比增长3.7倍,是值得把握的增长方向

3. 可学习的经验:做差异化要回归产品本身,贵价小众食材只适合做风味的加分项,不能作为核心卖点,只有打磨出匹配价格的产品力,让消费者感受到价值,才能长期生存

本文分析了当前餐饮端对食材的需求变化,给食材生产加工工厂提供了商业参考和发展启示

1. 产品生产需求:当前餐饮行业整体供应链同质化严重,餐饮端都在寻找差异化方向,小众特色食材的市场需求在提升,尤其是能给菜品带来独特风味的小众食材,有较大的市场增长空间

2. 商业机会:不少原本被包装成进口高端的小众食材,国内已经实现规模化种植养殖,比如鸸鹋蛋、普罗旺斯番茄,只要食材生产工厂能建立标准化的品质体系,打通流通渠道,就可以替代进口产品,降低餐饮端采购成本,获得稳定的大额订单

3. 发展启示:做小众食材生产,要提前做好合规性审核,建立稳定可控的产能供应体系,明确食材的风味价值标准,改变当前行业内只把小众食材当营销噱头的现状,靠真实价值打开长期市场

本文梳理了当前餐饮行业的痛点和发展趋势,给餐饮供应链、营销等相关服务商指明了发展方向

1. 行业发展趋势:高端餐饮正在从靠噱头溢价转向务实化发展,消费者越来越看重性价比,餐饮端对差异化食材的需求在提升,同时对食材供应链的稳定性、合规性要求也在不断提高

2. 客户核心痛点:当前餐饮端的核心痛点是常规食材供应链高度同质化,很难拉出差异化价格带,而想要用小众食材做产品创新,又面临小众食材没有标准化供应、产能不稳定、合规性无法保障的问题,制约了行业创新

3. 解决方案方向:服务商可以围绕小众特色食材搭建标准化的流通供应体系,做好品质分级、合规审核,保障稳定供货,解决餐饮端的差异化需求,同时还可以为餐饮端提供产品研发辅助,帮助餐饮端把小众食材的风味价值发挥出来,匹配市场需求

本文反映了当前餐饮行业对平台的需求,以及平台运营需要注意的问题,给生活服务平台的招商、运营提供了参考

1. 当前餐饮商家对平台的需求:越来越多高端餐饮开始主动拥抱大众消费,希望通过平台上线团购套餐,拓展家庭消费等更多消费场景,获得更多客流,平台需要针对高端餐饮推出适配的产品和服务,满足商家需求

2. 平台可把握的增长机会:高端餐饮亲民化转型趋势下,高端餐厅团购套餐的增长速度非常快,截至2024年6月,上海66家黑珍珠餐厅推出了超过200种团购套餐,订单量月均同比增长3.7倍,平台可以加大对合规高端餐饮的引流扶持,扩大平台整体交易规模

3. 需要规避的风险:对于主打猎奇小众食材的网红餐饮,平台要加强入驻前的资质审核,核查食材的合规性,避免不合规商家给平台带来口碑风险,同时可以引导商家合规经营,传递务实的餐饮消费导向

本文梳理了当前国内高端餐饮产业的新动向和存在的问题,对餐饮产业研究有较高的参考价值

1. 产业新动向:当前餐饮上游供应链同质化加剧,全行业都在寻求差异化突破;同时高端消费趋于理性,高端餐饮出现明显的亲民化转型,上线团购、下调人均、拓展家庭消费成为新趋势;数据显示当前网红餐饮店平均生命周期仅为8-12个月,能存活三年以上的不足10%,行业淘汰率居高不下

2. 产业新问题:很多高端餐饮陷入差异化误区,错把小众猎奇食材当成溢价万能药,这种模式存在诸多天生缺陷,需求端没有复购根基,供应链端缺乏标准化和稳定性,还存在突出的合规风险,很难支撑品牌长期发展

3. 研究启示:餐饮行业的差异化没有捷径,高端溢价需要有实实在在的产品价值支撑,不能单纯靠营销包装,未来产业端需要推动小众食材的标准化、合规化发展,才能让小众食材真正成为差异化的有效支撑,而非营销噱头

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article exposes the truth behind the 520-yuan emu egg and tomato scrambled egg dish sold at a Shanghai restaurant, offering a warning for general consumers dining out, especially when visiting viral high-end "Internet-famous" restaurants.

1. It breaks down the dish's actual cost: Emu eggs are already farmed at scale in Henan, Hainan and other regions in China. The scarcity is limited to distribution, not a real supply shortage, with bulk purchase prices ranging from 150 to 200 yuan per egg. Provence tomatoes have been widely planted in Shandong and Shaanxi for years, costing only 4-6 yuan per jin (0.5kg) for bulk restaurant purchases. Even if imported tomatoes are used exclusively, the per-serving cost only reaches 50 yuan. The restaurant's claim of 200 yuan in ingredient cost simply passes its own inventory waste and inefficient turnover onto consumers.

2. A warning for consumers: Most high-end viral dishes built on niche, novelty ingredients are nothing more than marketing gimmicks. Their cooking technique and flavor are no different from home-style dishes, and they only attract one-time visit consumers from social media打卡. Most of these restaurants stay popular for less than a year. Consumers should not overpay to satisfy their desire for social media content, and should instead focus on flavor and value for money.

This article analyzes the current status and trends of China's high-end F&B industry, providing clear reference for brand operation and product development for catering brands.

1. Shifting consumer trends: High-end diners are becoming increasingly rational and prioritize cost-effectiveness. Even Black Pearl-designated restaurants have launched group-buying packages and lowered average per-person spending. Consumption scenarios have gradually shifted from business banquets to family dining. Consumers now ask for the real value behind menu prices, and models that rely on information asymmetry to inflate prices no longer work.

2. Common pitfalls in brand marketing: Brands should not treat niche novelty ingredients as a one-size-fits-all solution for differentiated premium positioning. These ingredients only drive one-time curiosity-driven traffic, with no foundation for repeat purchases. They also carry risks of unstable supply chains and high compliance exposure. Most viral restaurants built on this trend follow the same trajectory: viral for three months, fading in six, closing in a year.

3. The right direction for product development: Differentiation cannot rely solely on swapping in rare ingredients. Brands should focus on refining cooking techniques and building long-term brand equity. Niche ingredients can only serve as an added value for dish flavor, not as a headline-grabbing flagship overpriced offering. Ingredients should serve the overall flavor of the dish, rather than being used solely to inflate prices through perceived rarity.

This article outlines current shifts in the catering industry, pointing out key risks and actionable opportunities for food and beverage operators.

1. Risk warning: The model of building high premiums on niche novelty ingredients is unsustainable. Curiosity-driven demand is inherently one-time, with no repeat purchases after consumers visit for打卡. Combined with the narrow customer base of high-end dining, this easily leads to a cliff-like drop in foot traffic. Meanwhile, supply chains for niche ingredients lack standardization and have unstable output. Many rare ingredients operate in a regulatory grey area, raising compliance risks that can lead to forced store closure.

2. Opportunity outlook: High-end catering is currently transitioning toward more accessible, value-focused offerings. The growth of high-end restaurants launching group-buy packages, lowering average prices, and expanding into family dining scenarios has been rapid. Monthly group-buy order volume at Shanghai Black Pearl restaurants grows 3.7 times year-over-year on average, making this a high-potential growth direction to pursue.

3. Key takeaways: Differentiation should return to the product itself. Expensive niche ingredients only work as a flavor add-on, not as a core selling point. Only by building product capability that matches price points and delivers tangible value to consumers can businesses survive long term.

This article analyzes current shifts in ingredient demand from the catering sector, providing business reference and development insights for ingredient production and processing factories.

1. Changing product demand: The overall catering supply chain currently suffers from severe homogenization, and catering operators are actively searching for differentiation. Market demand for niche specialty ingredients is rising, especially for ingredients that deliver unique flavor, which hold substantial room for market growth.

2. Business opportunities: Many niche ingredients previously marketed as premium imported products are already produced at scale domestically in China, such as emu eggs and Provence tomatoes. If ingredient factories can build standardized quality systems and open up distribution channels, they can replace imported products, cut procurement costs for catering clients, and secure large, stable orders.

3. Development insights: For producers of niche ingredients, it is critical to complete compliance reviews in advance, build a stable and controllable production supply system, and define clear flavor and quality standards for ingredients. This will help move the industry past the current status quo where niche ingredients are only used as marketing gimmicks, and build long-term market share through real value.

This article outlines key pain points and development trends in the catering industry, pointing out development directions for catering supply chain, marketing and related service providers.

1. Industry development trends: High-end catering is shifting from gimmick-driven premium pricing to value-focused operation. Consumers increasingly prioritize cost-effectiveness, and catering operators' demand for differentiated ingredients is growing, alongside rising requirements for supply chain stability and compliance.

2. Core client pain points: The core pain point for catering operators is that conventional ingredient supply chains are highly homogeneous, making it difficult to create differentiated price tiers. When they try to innovate with niche ingredients, they face widespread problems: lack of standardized supply, unstable production, and unproven compliance, all of which hold back industry innovation.

3. Direction for solutions: Service providers can build standardized distribution and supply systems centered on niche specialty ingredients, complete quality grading and compliance reviews, and guarantee stable supply to meet catering operators' demand for differentiation. They can also provide product development support to help clients maximize the flavor value of niche ingredients to match market demand.

This article outlines current demands from catering businesses on local life service platforms and notes key operational considerations, providing reference for merchant recruitment and platform operation.

1. Current demand from catering merchants: A growing number of high-end catering brands are proactively adapting to mass consumer demand, hoping to launch group-buy packages via platforms to expand into family dining and other scenarios and attract more foot traffic. Platforms need to roll out adapted products and services targeting high-end catering to meet merchant demand.

2. Growth opportunities for platforms: Amid the transition of high-end catering toward more accessible pricing, group-buy package sales at high-end restaurants are growing extremely rapidly. As of June 2024, 66 Black Pearl restaurants in Shanghai have launched over 200 group-buy packages, with monthly order volume growing 3.7 times year-over-year on average. Platforms can increase traffic support for compliant high-end catering to expand overall platform transaction volume.

3. Risks to avoid: For viral restaurants focused on novelty rare ingredients, platforms should strengthen compliance checks on ingredient qualification before onboarding, to avoid reputational damage from non-compliant merchants. Platforms can also guide merchants to operate in compliance with regulations and promote a value-focused consumption culture in catering.

This article outlines new trends and existing problems in China's current high-end catering industry, offering high reference value for catering industry research.

1. New industry trends: Upstream catering supply chains are facing increasing homogenization, and the entire industry is seeking breakthroughs through differentiation. At the same time, high-end consumption is becoming more rational, and high-end catering is undergoing a clear shift toward more accessible offerings: launching group-buy packages, lowering average per-person spending, and expanding into family dining have become mainstream new trends. Data shows the average lifecycle of a viral Internet-famous restaurant is only 8 to 12 months, with fewer than 10% surviving more than three years, keeping industry turnover extremely high.

2. Emerging industry problems: Many high-end catering businesses have fallen into a differentiation trap, incorrectly treating niche novelty ingredients as a cure-all for premium pricing. This model has inherent flaws: it lacks a foundation for repeat purchases on the demand side, lacks standardization and stability on the supply chain side, and carries prominent compliance risks, making it unable to support long-term brand development.

3. Research implications: There is no shortcut to differentiation in the catering industry. High-end premiums need to be supported by tangible product value, and cannot rely on marketing packaging alone. Going forward, the industry needs to push for standardization and compliance of niche ingredients, so that these products can truly become effective support for differentiation, rather than just marketing gimmicks.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

小众食材撑不起高端餐饮的“皇帝新衣”。

作者:郭佳哿;编辑:景雪

一盘番茄炒蛋卖520元。最近,上海一家餐厅用一道最家常的菜,再次把高端餐饮那套“靠稀有食材漫天要价”的底裤炒露了。

店家的说法很体面——用的是澳洲鸸鹋蛋配普罗旺斯进口番茄,单份食材成本就超200元。

但有意思的是厨师那句堪称商业鬼才的逻辑:“愿意做的人少,敢点的人也少”、“索性把定价定得高”。

正常生意的逻辑是定价合理才会有人买,买的人多了成本自然摊薄。他们这倒是反过来了:因为点的人少,所以才要卖得贵——合着备货滞销、周转低效的锅,全让少数愿意尝鲜的消费者背了?

不少网友嘲讽其为“明目张胆的智商税”,也有人认为小众食材采购成本高,定价偏高合乎情理。

拨开情绪对立的表象,类似事件在过去几年其实层出不穷。一个现实是,这几年餐饮供应链越来越同质化,大家都想找差异化捷径,小众、猎奇、听着有异域感的食材,俨然成了高端餐厅的溢价万能药。

但冷门真的等于值钱吗?那些靠猎奇食材爆火的网红餐厅,又有几个活过了一年?

520元里,食材到底值多少钱?

店家喊冤的核心论据是 “单份食材成本超200元”,好像成本够高,定价就天经地义。但这包装出来的 “高端食材”,未必不是另一种 “皇帝的新衣”。

先说说那颗很多人连名字都读不利索的鸸鹋蛋。

鸸鹋,国内有个俗称是“澳洲鸵鸟”,其蛋壳呈深墨绿色,单颗重500-700克,约等于10-15枚普通鸡蛋。国内特种养殖市场的批量采购价,大致在150-200元/颗,零售端价格会再高一些。

听着确实不便宜,但核心问题是,它的“贵”和鱼子酱、松露那种天然稀缺完全不是一回事。

国内河南、海南、广东等地早有规模化鸸鹋养殖,产能没有不可突破的天然天花板。它的小众,只是因为市场需求小、流通量低,属于流通稀缺,而非资源稀缺。

说白了,只要有钱赚,养殖规模随时能扩,价格也会跟着往下掉。

再看被拿来当高端门面的“普罗旺斯番茄”。

很多人一听名字默认是法国进口的高档货,实则这个品种国内山东、陕西早已大规模引种,种植技术成熟,全年产量稳定。餐饮渠道批量拿货,精品级别的普罗旺斯番茄也就4-6元/斤,顶级规格也很少超过8元/斤。

一份番茄炒蛋用两三个番茄顶天了,食材成本撑死10块钱。

就算商家真的全部选用纯进口鲜果,成本也远没到离谱的地步。

参考欧洲高端食材商的报价,法国普罗旺斯产区的鲜番茄零售价约10英镑/公斤,叠加关税、物流、损耗等等成本,到港成本最多也就100来块钱一公斤。折算到单份菜品的用量里,番茄成本最多也就50元。

而且这类进口鲜番茄多为季节性供应,全年稳定供货的商用渠道极少,一些餐厅嘴里的“普罗旺斯进口番茄”,本质就是个拿来抬身价的营销标签。

所以,商家口中的“没有利润”,大概率是把所有食材的备货损耗、冷链运输、备料人工全打包算了进去。

但备货损耗、周转低效,本就是商家要承担的运营风险。把成本全额摊到少数尝鲜的消费者头上,还包装成“稀有食材的合理溢价”。这算盘打得确实够响。

当然,餐饮定价从来不是简单的“成本×2”。人工、租金、损耗,包括服务和品牌价值,都可以构成溢价的理由。

但这道菜最站不住脚的地方,恰恰是除了原料本身,再也找不出第二个能支撑溢价的点。

小红书上不少体验过的网友表示,这道菜从烹饪手法到口味,和家常做法没本质区别。没有独家工艺,没有复杂工序,说白了,就是把贵价原料按家常菜的方式炒熟,直接端上餐桌卖成品价。

这也是这道菜最难解释的地方,不单是鸸鹋蛋到底值多少钱,而是餐厅把几个更贵的原料组合到一起之后,成品有没有脱离普通番茄炒蛋的认知区间。

如果所谓高端小众食材的最终成品,还是一盘味道普通的番茄炒蛋。争议也就不难理解了。

小众食材供应链,天生带着风险

高端餐饮迷恋小众食材,不是从这盘番茄炒蛋开始的。

它反而是上海高端餐饮圈这几年的一个缩影——当常规食材卷不出差价,商家就一窝蜂往冷门、猎奇、听着有故事的原料上找溢价。

最典型的就是去年刷屏的Canopia蓬冠树餐厅。

这家主打“生态融合料理”的店,把雨林场景搬进了上海,人均直接开到3888元,每晚只开放一桌,预约一度排到一个月后。

它的全部记忆点就是绑在小众食材上:开胃菜让客人现剪盆栽树叶直接啃,用酸蚂蚁替代醋提天然酸味,竹虫熬酱做风味基底,最出圈的甜品叫“鲜花插在象粪上”——号称用消毒灭菌后的大象粪便碾碎制成基底。

极致的猎奇换来了极致的流量。

相关话题全网播放量破亿,探店博主挤破头,全网都在讨论“花四千块在上海吃屎”到底值不值。

但热度还没焐热,市场监管就上门了。经查实,餐厅使用的大象粪便沙门氏菌超标4倍,竹虫、蚂蚁等食材也未取得正规食品原料资质,直接因违反《食品安全法》被立案查封,从全网爆火到彻底停业,前后不到两个月。

这不是个例。

上海这几年冒出来的“小众食材网红店”,几乎都逃不开“三月爆红、半年熄火、一年闭店”的宿命。

有用酸蚂蚁、竹虫等各类昆虫,以及特殊发酵物拿去做分子调味的,有用西南深山野生植物做创意菜的,还有拿各种冷门特种禽畜当主打的,而更大一部分则热衷于标注那些普通消费者不熟悉的产地、品种和养殖方式。

它们的路径高度统一:找一款同行不用的食材,包装成“小众高端”“原生风味”,靠探店内容引爆社交平台,开业初期一饭难求,等新鲜感过去,客流立刻断崖式下跌。

中国烹饪协会数据显示,网红餐饮店平均生命周期仅为8-12个月,能存活三年以上的不足10%。

为什么火得快,凉得更快?原因简单到直白。

首先,猎奇需求本身就是一次性的,没有复购根基。绝大多数人打卡这类餐厅,动机根本不是吃饭,是满足好奇心和社交展示欲。

拍组照片、发条小红书或者朋友圈,消费需求就彻底完成了。没人会为了同一种猎奇感,反复花大价钱上门。而高端餐饮的客群本就狭窄,失去复购,等于直接失去了生存的基本盘。

而回到产业端,小众食材的供应链,天生带着风险。

“小众”的另一面,就是没有标准化、没有稳定产能、没有成熟的流通体系。

批次品质忽高忽低是常态,供货说断就断也不稀奇。更麻烦的是,很多冷门食材游走在食品监管的灰色地带,拿“大象粪便”来看,今天还在当创意卖点,明天可能就被认定不合规。

国家卫健委《新食品原料安全性审查管理办法》明确提到,在我国无传统食用习惯的动物、植物、微生物等作为新食品原料,应经过安全性审查后方可用于食品生产经营。

对一门正经生意来说,核心食材随时可能出问题,本质就是埋了颗定时炸弹。

事实上,很多商家对高端餐饮有个致命误解:别人不用的食材,我用了就是高端。

但真正能站得住的高端食材,从来不是消费者没见过,而是“不可替代”。

鱼子酱贵,是因为风味独特且产能天然受限;和牛贵,是因为饲养工艺和口感等级有明确标准。它们的贵,有实实在在的价值支撑,不是单纯靠“少见”撑着。

餐厅越想用它制造差异,越要回答一个更具体的问题:这个食材放进这道菜以后,到底带来了什么不可替代的价值?

都在卷差异化,但小众食材从来不是万能解药

回到最核心的问题:当常规食材的供应链越来越透明,餐饮的差异化到底该往哪找?

答案肯定不是“比谁的食材更冷门”。

过去高端餐厅讲食材,多少还有一点信息差。但餐饮工业化走到今天,上游供应链的同质化是全行业共识。

连锁品牌用的肉蛋菜,大部分都出自头部供应商,品质、规格、采购价差高度趋同。想在大众食材上拉出明显价格带,要么靠极致工艺,要么靠品牌沉淀,但这都不是短期能见效的事。

于是“小众食材”才成了最讨巧的捷径。

鸸鹋蛋、酸蚂蚁、听起来像海外产地的番茄,天然就能制造距离感。不需要去磨手艺,也不用攒口碑,只要换一款别人没怎么见过的原料,再包装上产地故事,客单价立刻就能往上跳一档。

名字越陌生,故事越好讲;顾客越没见过,餐厅越容易把价格往上抬。看似找到了差异化,实则是在消耗自己的产品力。

小众食材本身并不是原罪。

真正能跑通的玩法,从来不是把小众食材做成天价主打菜博眼球,而是通过调味搭配,让食材成为这道菜的附加值。

前两年汉堡重新爆火,就能看到类似区别,真正能让人记住的汉堡,不是简单地把天价和牛、鹅肝、黑松露这些贵价食材往里叠加。

一个汉堡要好吃,先要处理油脂、酸味、酱汁、面包和肉饼之间的关系。所以我们能看到真正会去理解食材的厨师,会用小众的蓝纹芝士去中和油脂的厚重,用菌菇酱、腌菜等其他发酵风味去创造出又解腻又有鲜度的层次感。

贵的、偏门的食材永远不是主角,而是画龙点睛的那一笔。

高端餐饮这两年已经不是闭眼涨价的市场。就连黑珍珠、米其林餐厅都开始上线团购套餐。证券时报报道提到,截至2024年6月,上海66家黑珍珠餐厅已在美团推出超过200种团购套餐,套餐订单量月均同比增长3.7倍。

上海遇外滩的主理人也向媒体提到,餐厅过去人均1500元,后来下降到1200元,甚至到800元,消费场景也在从商务宴请转向家庭消费。

这意味着,高端餐饮的顾客也开始算账。

以前一顿饭贵,可以用主厨的名气、稀缺的席位以及服务体验来解释。现在消费更谨慎,高端餐厅也得回答更务实的问题:这顿饭值钱在哪?

一道菜要卖得贵很容易,但要让消费者尝得出贵是另一回事。小众食材在这个环境里,反而更容易被反噬。

它第一次出现时,确实能带来新鲜感。第二次再出现,顾客就会开始比较味道。第三次还想卖高价,餐厅就必须拿出稳定的产品力。

餐饮行业从来没有捷径。靠生僻食材撑起来的高端,炒得越热,露馅越快。而热闹过后还是要回到几个老生常谈的问题:好不好吃,值不值,下次还会不会点。

如果这些问题回答不上来,小众食材就不是高端餐饮的解药,只是一张更贵的包装纸。消费者拆开以后,发现里面还是一盘普通的番茄炒蛋。

注:文/专注餐饮供应链的,文章来源:餐饮供应链指南(公众号ID:cygylzn),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:餐饮供应链指南

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

小众食材为什么不能成为高端餐饮的长期溢价支撑?

多数小众食材属于流通稀缺而非资源稀缺,产能不存在天然天花板,价格可随养殖规模扩大下降。同时小众食材供应链无统一标准、供货不稳定,部分还可能触碰食品监管红线,单纯靠猎奇感吸引的消费者无复购意愿,无法支撑长期溢价。

国内网红餐饮店的平均生命周期是多久?

中国烹饪协会数据显示,国内网红餐饮店平均生命周期仅为8-12个月,能存活三年以上的不足10%。其中依赖小众猎奇食材的网红餐厅大多逃不开“三月爆红、半年熄火、一年闭店”的宿命。

高端餐饮做差异化的正确方式是什么?

高端餐饮做差异化不能盲目依赖冷门食材抬价,而应打磨极致工艺,沉淀品牌价值,将小众食材作为菜品风味的补充,通过调味搭配创造不可替代的口感体验,同时匹配符合产品价值的合理定价,提升消费者复购意愿。

售价520元的鸸鹋蛋番茄炒蛋食材成本大概是多少?

单颗鸸鹋蛋批量采购价在150-200元,就算使用进口普罗旺斯番茄,单份番茄成本最多50元,合计食材成本约200-250元,商家宣称的成本超200元大概率包含了备货损耗、冷链运输等运营成本。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0