广告
加载中

外卖大战一年账单:烧掉1500亿 改变了什么?

定焦One团队 2026-06-04 13:22
定焦One团队 2026/06/04 13:22

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章梳理了持续一年的巨头外卖大战全部核心信息,干货如下

1.核心战局:2025年Q2到2026年Q1,美团、阿里、京东三家共烧掉至少1500亿补贴,将行业日均单量从原本的八九千万推至峰值2亿单以上,当前格局稳定,美团日均约6500万单、淘宝闪购约5000万单、京东外卖约900万单,整体单量较高峰有所回落。

2.退潮原因:一方面三家连续烧钱后利润压力陡增,主动缩减补贴,美团纯餐饮外卖单均盈亏已在4、5月转正;另一方面监管层明确叫停恶性价格竞争,引导行业良性发展。

3.未来走向:当前餐饮外卖竞争烈度下降,巨头已将战场转向即时零售领域,阿里整合业态、并购补资源,美团扩张前置仓,后续行业竞争仍会持续。

这场外卖大战给餐饮及零售品牌商带来多方面值得参考的行业信息,核心干货如下

1.渠道变化:外卖即时零售赛道已经形成新的格局,除原有美团外,淘宝闪购、京东外卖都已经站稳脚跟,京东外卖已经做到日均近千万单的规模,成功建立起用户点外卖的心智,品牌商拥有了更多新的渠道选择。

2.需求与机会:大战期间平台大额补贴充分教育了用户,带动即时消费需求大幅增长,即时零售还能和传统电商形成协同,带动品牌获客、提升用户活跃度、增加交易量,品牌商可借赛道扩张期拓展新增量。

3.布局参考:目前中高客单价外卖细分市场仍由美团占据优势,全品类即时零售是未来发展方向,品牌商可结合自身定位对接不同平台,抓住即时零售扩张的红利。

外卖大战给外卖和即时零售领域的卖家提供了多方面的机会提示和风险参考,干货如下

1.政策信号:监管已经明确叫停外卖平台的恶性补贴竞争,引导行业良性发展,后续恶性价格战带来的异常流量波动会减少,行业经营环境会更稳定,卖家不用再应对频繁的价格战冲击。

2.市场机会:经过一年大战,即时零售、外卖赛道的用户需求被充分激活,用户已经养成在淘宝、京东点外卖和即时零售商品的习惯,除美团外,卖家可以多布局淘宝闪购、京东外卖新渠道,获取更多免费流量、拓展新用户。

3.风险提示:当前行业补贴持续退坡,卖家不能过度依赖平台补贴获客,需要逐步建立自身的用户心智;同时要关注抖音等新玩家对行业流量的分流影响,提前布局应对外部冲击。

外卖及即时零售行业的变化,给消费品生产工厂带来了新的商业机会和转型启示,干货如下

1.新增市场机会:经过一年外卖大战,即时零售的用户规模和单量大幅增长,用户对快消、生鲜、餐饮周边等产品的即时消费需求已经被充分教育,市场整体规模快速扩张,给各类相关生产工厂带来了稳定的增量市场。

2.渠道拓展空间:当前三大平台都在加速布局即时零售网络,美团计划2027年建成10万个前置仓,阿里也在整合全平台即时零售业态,开放了更多的品类接入入口,工厂可以对接平台的即时零售网络,拓展新的出货渠道。

3.转型方向启示:即时零售对订单响应速度、产品适配性提出新要求,工厂可开发适配即时配送、小批量即时消费的产品,同时推进数字化改造,提升柔性生产能力,更好适配即时零售渠道的需求。

外卖大战后即时零售行业的发展变化,给相关服务商带来了明确的行业信号和业务机会,干货如下

1.行业发展趋势:餐饮外卖的恶性竞争已经结束,行业整体竞争转向全品类即时零售领域,三大巨头都在加大即时零售的布局力度,行业整体规模仍会保持持续扩张,对配套服务商的需求会持续增长,市场空间进一步打开。

2.客户核心痛点:当前头部布局即时零售遇到多个明确痛点,阿里需要平衡AI和即时零售的双线投入,整体利润压力较大;美团需要解决平台闪购和自营前置仓业务的内部协同问题,资源整合难度大;京东聚焦供应链打造,需要进一步提升供应链运转效率。

3.业务拓展方向:服务商可针对不同玩家的痛点,提供供应链优化、内部业务流程整合、数字化系统改造、精准营销获客等相关服务,对接巨头即时零售扩张的需求,拓展自身业务边界。

这场持续一年的外卖大战,给所有本地生活及即时零售领域的平台商带来了多方面的经验和启示,核心干货如下

1.行业需求变化:经过一年大战,用户对即时配送、全品类即时零售的需求已经被充分激活,用户不再只满足于餐饮外卖,对快消、生鲜等品类的即时配送需求越来越高,同时恶性价格补贴已经不被监管和市场认可,行业呼吁良性竞争环境。

2.头部平台的最新布局方向:当前头部平台都已经缩减餐饮外卖补贴,转向布局即时零售,阿里整合全集团即时零售业态统一管理,洽谈收购朴朴超市强化供应链;美团收购叮咚买菜补充前置仓资源,加速扩张前置仓网络;京东聚焦供应链协同,不盲目追求规模。

3.风险规避提示:平台需要避免无底线的恶性价格竞争,不仅会严重挤压自身利润,还会引发监管关注;同时需要关注抖音等外部新玩家的流量分流,还要解决内部不同业务板块的协同问题,避免内耗降低整体竞争力。

这场外卖大战是国内即时零售产业近年最重大的行业事件,给产业研究提供了多方面的新素材和新方向,核心干货如下

1.产业新动向:国内即时零售产业已经从美团一家独大,转变为美团、阿里、京东三足鼎立的竞争格局,竞争战场从原有餐饮外卖转向全品类即时零售,头部企业都在通过并购整合前置仓资源、整合内部业态强化竞争力,行业在补贴退坡后逐步走向良性发展。

2.产业新问题:本次大战暴露了多个行业新问题,一是头部互联网企业为争夺赛道可烧掉上千亿利润,对行业原有利润结构造成巨大冲击;二是头部企业普遍存在内部业务协同难题,美团平台与自营即时零售存在内耗,阿里双线投入造成利润压力;三是抖音等新玩家对头部巨头的既有业务造成明显冲击,行业格局仍存在变数。

3.政策研究启示:本次恶性补贴竞争引发监管出手叫停,为互联网行业反垄断、反不正当竞争监管提供了新的实践案例,对研究平台经济监管方向有较高参考价值。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article organizes all core information about the year-long food delivery price war between China's internet giants, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Core Battle Dynamics: From Q2 2025 to Q1 2026, Meituan, Alibaba and JD.com collectively spent at least 150 billion yuan in subsidies. This pushed the industry's daily order volume from 80-90 million to a peak of over 200 million. The market has now stabilized, with current daily order volumes standing at around 65 million for Meituan, 50 million for Taobao Flash Purchase, and 9 million for JD Delivery. Overall, order volumes have slightly declined from the peak.

2. What Ended the War: First, the three giants faced surging profit pressure after consecutive quarters of heavy spending, leading them to actively cut subsidies. By April and May 2026, Meituan's pure food delivery business turned profitable on a per-order basis. Second, regulators explicitly ordered a halt to cutthroat price competition to guide the industry toward healthy development.

3. Future Outlook: Competition intensity in food delivery has declined, and the giants have shifted their battle to the instant retail sector. Alibaba is integrating its business formats and acquiring new resources, while Meituan is expanding its network of front warehouses. Industry competition will remain ongoing in the new battlefield.

This food delivery war brings several key industry insights for food and consumer retail brands, with core takeaways as follows:

1. New Channel Landscape: A new competitive structure has emerged in the food delivery and instant retail space. In addition to incumbent leader Meituan, both Taobao Flash Purchase and JD Delivery have established solid footholds. JD Delivery has already reached nearly 10 million daily orders and built user awareness for on-demand ordering, giving brands more new channel options.

2. Unlocked Demand and Opportunities: Heavy platform subsidies during the war effectively educated consumers and drove substantial growth in on-demand consumption demand. Instant retail can also create synergy with traditional e-commerce, helping brands acquire new customers, boost user engagement, and increase transaction volume. Brands can capture new growth amid the industry's expansion.

3. Strategic Layout Guidance: Meituan still holds a leading position in the mid-to-high average order value food delivery segment, while full-category instant retail is the future direction. Brands can align with different platforms based on their own positioning to capture growth dividends from instant retail's expansion.

The year-long food delivery war provides opportunity alerts and risk guidance for sellers in the food delivery and instant retail space, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Clear Policy Signal: Regulators have explicitly banned cutthroat subsidy competition between platforms and guided the industry toward healthy development. Going forward, abnormal traffic fluctuations caused by vicious price wars will decrease, and the operating environment will become more stable. Sellers will no longer need to cope with the constant disruption of price wars.

2. New Market Opportunities: After one year of war, consumer demand for instant retail and food delivery has been fully activated. Users have already formed habits of ordering food and instant retail goods on Taobao and JD.com. In addition to Meituan, sellers can expand to the new channels of Taobao Flash Purchase and JD Delivery to access more free traffic and acquire new users.

3. Key Risk Warnings: As industry subsidies continue to decline, sellers cannot rely excessively on platform subsidies for customer acquisition and need to gradually build their own user awareness. At the same time, sellers should pay attention to traffic diversion from new entrants such as Douyin and prepare early to counter external shocks.

Changes in the food delivery and instant retail industry have brought new business opportunities and transformation insights for consumer goods manufacturers, with key takeaways as follows:

1. New Incremental Market Opportunities: After one year of the food delivery war, the user base and order volume of instant retail have grown significantly. Consumer demand for on-demand purchases of fast-moving consumer goods, fresh produce and food-related products has been fully cultivated, and the overall market is expanding rapidly, bringing a stable incremental market for all relevant manufacturers.

2. New Channel Expansion Space: All three major platforms are accelerating the layout of instant retail networks. Meituan plans to build 100,000 front warehouses by 2027, while Alibaba is integrating its company-wide instant retail business and opening up more category access entries. Manufacturers can connect to platforms' instant retail networks to expand new distribution channels.

3. Guidance on Transformation Directions: Instant retail raises new requirements for order response speed and product adaptation. Manufacturers can develop products tailored for instant delivery and small-batch on-demand consumption, while advancing digital transformation to improve flexible production capabilities to better match the needs of the instant retail channel.

The development of the instant retail industry after the food delivery war brings clear industry signals and business opportunities for relevant service providers, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Broader Industry Growth Trend: Cutthroat competition in food delivery has ended, and industry competition has shifted to the full-category instant retail sector. The three major giants are all increasing their layout in instant retail, the overall industry size will continue to expand, demand for supporting service providers will keep growing, and the market space will further open up.

2. Clear Core Pain Points of Major Players: Current leading players face several distinct pain points in their instant retail expansion. Alibaba needs to balance dual investments in AI and instant retail, and faces significant overall profit pressure. Meituan needs to solve internal coordination issues between its platform flash purchase business and self-operated front warehouse business, which creates high resource integration difficulty. JD.com focuses on supply chain building and needs to further improve supply chain operation efficiency.

3. Targeted Business Expansion Directions: Service providers can offer targeted solutions such as supply chain optimization, internal business process integration, digital system transformation and precision marketing services to address the pain points of different players, align with the giants' expansion needs in instant retail, and expand their own business boundaries.

This year-long food delivery war brings multi-faceted experience and insights for all platform players in the local services and instant retail industry, with core takeaways as follows:

1. Shift in Industry Demand: After one year of the war, user demand for instant delivery and full-category instant retail has been fully activated. Users are no longer satisfied with food delivery alone, and demand for instant delivery of fast-moving consumer goods, fresh produce and other categories is growing. Meanwhile, cutthroat price subsidies are no longer accepted by regulators or the market, and the industry is calling for a healthy competitive environment.

2. Latest Layout Directions of Leading Platforms: Leading platforms have all cut food delivery subsidies and shifted to布局 instant retail. Alibaba is integrating its group-wide instant retail business under unified management and is in talks to acquire Pupu Supermarket to strengthen its supply chain. Meituan acquired Dingdong Maicai to add to its front warehouse resources and accelerate expansion of its front warehouse network. JD.com focuses on supply chain synergy and does not blindly pursue scale.

3. Risk Mitigation Guidance: Platforms must avoid bottomless cutthroat price competition, which not only severely squeezes their own profits but also draws regulatory scrutiny. At the same time, platforms need to pay attention to traffic diversion from new external players such as Douyin, and solve coordination issues between different internal business segments to avoid internal friction that erodes overall competitiveness.

This food delivery war is the most significant industry event in China's instant retail sector in recent years, and provides new materials and directions for industrial research, with core takeaways as follows:

1. New Industry Dynamics: China's instant retail industry has shifted from a Meituan-dominated market to a three-way competition between Meituan, Alibaba and JD.com. The competitive battlefield has shifted from traditional food delivery to full-category instant retail. Leading players are strengthening their competitiveness by acquiring and integrating front warehouse resources and consolidating internal business formats, and the industry is gradually moving toward healthy development after subsidy cuts.

2. New Industry Problems Exposed: The war exposed several new industry-wide problems. First, leading internet companies are willing to burn hundreds of billions of yuan in profits to compete for the track, which creates huge shocks to the industry's original profit structure. Second, leading players generally face internal business coordination challenges: Meituan suffers internal friction between its platform and self-operated instant retail businesses, while Alibaba's dual-line investment creates heavy profit pressure. Third, new entrants such as Douyin have created clear disruptions to the incumbents' existing businesses, leaving the industry structure still uncertain.

3. Insights for Policy Research: Regulators stepped in to halt this vicious subsidy competition, providing a new practical case for antitrust and anti-unfair competition regulation in the internet industry, which has high reference value for research on the direction of platform economy regulation.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

战场已经变了。

6月1日,美团发布2026年Q1财报。至此,从2025年Q2到这一季度,整整持续一年的外卖大战,终于有了一份完整的账单。根据测算,美团、阿里、京东三家公司在外卖上至少烧掉了1500亿元,把原本一天八九千万单的餐饮外卖生意,硬生生推到了最高峰时的2亿单以上。

这场仗改变了很多事。一年多前,饿了么还有自己的名字,提到“闪购”两个字大多数人想到的是美团闪购,没有人在京东上点外卖,港股的恒生科技指数也还没被市场调侃成“恒生外卖指数”。

一年后,饿了么并入了阿里中国电商事业群,京东外卖做到了日均1000万单左右,美团用连续三个季度的亏损守住了市场份额第一的位置。

战争已经在退潮。三家的市场份额格局稳定了两个季度,整体单量从高峰回落,最新一季的财报里,三家的姿态都明显变了。

美团调整后净利润相比前两个季度大幅收窄,财报和电话会上更多地提及零售;阿里净利润几乎清零,创下近两年新低,但更多的钱不再烧向外卖,而是花在了AI上;京东的净利润,则基本回到了外卖大战开打时的水平。

一位美团内部人士告诉「定焦One」,2026年Q1,美团的餐饮外卖日均单量在6500万单左右,淘宝闪购、京东外卖分别约为5000万单、900万单,三家的订单比例与去年Q4基本持平,整体单量都有所下降。

“美团现阶段的目标是,在保证份额领先的前提下缩减补贴,可以接受竞争对手的日均单量不超过自己的80%。”这位人士说。

三家的战略在转向,监管也在收紧。

今年3月末,国家市场监督管理总局转发《经济日报》文章《外卖大战该结束了》,被市场视为监管层叫停平台恶性竞争、引导行业良性发展的明确信号。

多重因素叠加,外卖大战最激烈时刻已经过去,但这并不意味着,巨头间的竞争会减弱。

01.账面上没有赢家,但各有各的“赢”法

从过去一年的账单来看,这场外卖大战的三个主要参与者,没有绝对意义上的赢家。

先来看美团财报。

Q1延续了上一个季度的基调,营收规模略有改善,核心本地商业(CLC)期内实现营收641亿元,同比微增0.2%,增速时隔两个季度转正;公司整体的经营亏损也从此前连续两个季度的100亿元以上,减亏至亏损65亿元。均略微超出市场预期。

营收规模和经营利润是财报中与外卖大战联系最紧密的两个指标。在美团的财报中,通常不会把给用户的补贴全部计为费用,而是把其中一部分计入收入扣减项,这意味着营收增速往往比利润增速更能直观地体现外卖补贴的力度。

2025年Q3、Q4,美团的CLC营收均出现了同比下滑,其中在外卖大战最激烈的Q3,同比下滑接近3%。今年Q1回到持平,本身就是补贴退坡的信号。

减亏幅度超出预期,一方面因为营收略好于预期,在彭博一致预期中,今年Q1的CLC营收预期是与去年持平,实际结果比预期多了大约7500万元。

另一个原因是销售费用大幅收窄,今年Q1美团的销售费用大约为230亿元,相较于此前两个季度的300多亿元明显下降。

在财报发布后的业绩电话会上美团透露,不含非餐闪购的纯餐饮外卖UE(单均盈亏)在今年的4、5月份已经实现转正。

一位长期关注美团的券商分析师告诉「定焦One」,去年Q3,美团外卖UE的最低点大约是-2元,在今年Q1末期大约缩减到-1元,如果管理层所说的在Q2实现盈亏平衡,那么整个Q2的减亏幅度在明显提速。

此外,该分析师还表示,美团主要竞争对手的UE在去年一度比美团低4元,即美团送一单亏2元,竞争对手送一单亏6元。今年Q1这样的差距已经缩小至3元以内,各家的补贴力度都在明显下降。

阿里和京东此前几周发布的财报也证实了这一趋势。

阿里的Q1财报中,如果剔除无形资产摊销和减值,以及对千问APP的投入,经调整净利润水平比去年同期小幅下滑;京东今年Q1的经调整归母净利润,则是回到了与2025年Q2基本持平的水平。

烧掉的上千亿利润背后,账面输赢只是这场战争的一半。

此前据「定焦One」了解,去年后三个季度,美团、阿里、京东三家在外卖大战中投入的补贴分别为400亿、700亿、350亿元,一年内至少合计烧掉了1450亿元。

今年Q1虽然补贴力度减弱,但三家的补贴总和也会在百亿以上。外卖大战打了一年,至少1500亿元的利润被烧掉。

但看似三败俱伤的背后,各家也都拿到了自己想要的东西。

京东用一年的时间拿到了日均1000万单左右的外卖单量,这个规模相当于外卖大战开打前饿了么日均单量的一半,基本在外卖市场站住了脚,并且也成功建立起在京东点外卖的用户心智。

阿里的外卖市场份额从四分之一一路做到与美团接近,甚至在个别月份超越了美团成为行业第一,更重要的是,以外卖为代表的即时零售业务拉动了电商业务的增长。

在阿里Q1财报电话会上,蒋凡表示,即时零售与传统电商业务的协同效应,具体体现在推动获客、提升用户活跃度、满足多元化消费需求、增加交易量、改善变现能力以及支持物流基础设施等多个方面。阿里Q1的GMV和CMR展现出强劲的增长动能,即时零售在其中发挥了关键作用。

对于美团而言,虽然失去了此前绝对的市场领先地位,但也用比竞争对手更小的代价巩固了自己的外卖基本盘,此外,在中高客单价的外卖细分市场上,美团依旧占据优势。

02.一年打掉千亿利润,超出所有参与者的预期

回过头看,这场仗在2025年Q2开打的时候,没有任何一家公司能预想到,它会演变成今天的样子。

京东与美团必有一战,这是2025年之前互联网圈多年的共识。随着京东的配送时效性越来越强,美团的外卖品类越来越丰富,两家的业务边界越来越模糊,一场短兵相接在所难免。

2025年2月11日,京东正式宣布招募餐饮外卖商家。一周后,京东又宣布将逐步为京东外卖全职骑手缴纳五险一金,且五险一金的所有成本由京东承担。

市场起初把这一动作解读为“试水”。即便京东早期通过大额补贴一度将日均单量做到2500万单,美团内部并没有太多的危机感。

一位美团内部人士告诉「定焦One」,2025年年初,美团的重心还在零售,管理层频繁考察线下零售品牌,商讨合作的可能性。在一次内部会议上,美团高管提出,要重点关注京东做外卖对自己电商主站的带动作用,而非盯着竞争对手的单量。言下之意是,如果京东做得好,那么美团未来扩展零售业务的时候也可以借鉴。

战况在4月底开始发生变化。随着淘宝闪购的入局,美团在部分城市和地区的订单量和市场份额出现明显下滑,为了保住领先优势,不得不跟进补贴。

一个细节是,此前已经多年不参与美团财务月会的美团S-team成员开始一同参会,关注美团外卖和闪购的补贴情况,以及对公司利润的后续影响。

美团最初的判断是,这场外卖大战会是一场持续一到两年的持久战,整个2025年,公司可能要额外支出150亿至200亿元的补贴。从最终结果来看,美团还是低估了这场战争的残酷性。

到了6月中旬,上线仅一个多月的淘宝闪购餐饮外卖日均单量已经接近美团的一半,并且还在持续加码补贴,战争被推向另一个量级。

8月,淘宝闪购借着“秋天的第一杯奶茶”的营销,把单日订单峰值进一步推到了1.2亿单。

在阿里巴巴Q2的财报电话会上,蒋凡称淘宝闪购的订单已经“领先”竞争对手,“只看外卖到家的订单份额,我们已经领先行业。”

据「定焦One」了解,外卖大战初期,在一次由卖方组织的投资人一对一沟通会上,阿里的高管曾表示对于外卖补贴的投入不设上限,原因是不能让竞争对手知道自己的底线在哪里。

美团也很快意识到自己低估了对手投入的决心,并迅速跟进补贴,把日订单峰值一度推到了1.5亿,以确保自己的领先地位。

整个2025年Q3,三家平台的餐饮外卖日均订单总和一度突破2亿单,与此同时,三家单季净利润同比下降幅度都超过50%。三家盈利公司同时主动把利润烧掉一半以上,这是过去几年从未出现过的局面。

随着各家的利润开始不堪重负,到了Q3末期,补贴力度开始收紧。

美团CLC CEO王莆中通过媒体呼吁行业回归正常的商业判断,回归理性;京东CEO许冉也表示京东不会关注竞争对手的细微动作,京东做外卖“不争朝夕”。

再加上行业监管一轮又一轮收紧,外卖大战被阶段性地按下了暂停键。

03.水面之下的竞争和威胁仍然严峻

外卖大战进入2026年,基调已经清晰。餐饮外卖的烈度下降,但整个即时零售战场的竞争不会缓和。

据晚点LatePost报道,今年5月,阿里进行了一次重要的人事调整,集团CTO吴泽明进入阿里合伙人委员会,成为委员会第5名成员;盒马CEO严筱磊的汇报线从吴泽明调整为直接向分管阿里整个商业板块的蒋凡汇报。

两项调整都与即时零售高度相关,吴泽明同时是淘宝闪购的CEO,盒马则是阿里即时零售板块重要的组成部分。

目前阿里的即时零售业态涵盖线下商超百货、盒马门店、盒马前置仓、天猫超市,平台和自营模式相互结合,全口径下的非餐即时零售日均单量已经做到美团的一半。此次组织架构调整也意味着,阿里将所有即时零售相关的业态全部统一在了中国电商事业群之下,由蒋凡统一管理。

此外,阿里还在参与洽谈对朴朴超市的收购。几周前有媒体报道,阿里、京东、美团三家都参与了生鲜前置仓朴朴超市的收购。

接近美团的人士告诉「定焦One」,美团只在早期参与过收购谈判,但随后由于报价过高就没有继续跟进。

相较于阿里在即时零售上的积极扩张,美团更多地是希望依仗自己现有的美团闪购和自营前置仓小象超市来扩展非餐市场。

在最新一季财报中,美团调整了披露口径,将来自小象超市、快驴、药品、酒类等自营业务的收入单独列出为“商品销售收入”。单独披露这项数据后,美团在自营零售业务上的数据被更清晰地呈现出来。

Q1,美团新业务的商品销售收入达到179.89亿元,同比增长40.7%,这部分增量主要由小象超市贡献。

今年2月,美团还通过收购叮咚买菜进一步强化自己的前置仓布局。2月5日,美团发公告宣布将以7.17亿美元(约人民币50亿元)的对价收购叮咚买菜全部已发行股份及其中国境内业务。

叮咚买菜拥有1000多个前置仓和700万月活用户,这次收购主要是对小象超市业态的一次补充。与此同时,平台模式的即时零售业务美团闪购也在持续扩张,当前已经建成超过3万个前置仓,并计划在2027年建成10万个。

与阿里和美团相比,京东并不追求规模优势,而是更加专注于京东七鲜、京东秒送各业务间的协同,以及供应链的打造。

外卖大战最激烈的时刻已经过去,但这并不意味着巨头之间的竞争会减弱,只是战场换了。在即时零售的新战场上,挑战不仅来自外部,也来自内部。

阿里要平衡未来一年对AI和大消费的投入,长时间的双线作战已经让利润不堪重负。

而美团所要解决的问题可能是平台与自营业务的协同。在过去很长一段时间里,美团闪购和小象超市这两大即时零售主力都是“各干各的”,前者属于CLC,后者属于食杂零售,小象给到美团外卖骑手的佣金比自己更低。当阿里全面打通即时零售业态全力出击的时候,美团更应该思考如何解决好业务的协同问题。

除此之外,在外卖大战如火如荼进行期间,阿里的电商业务和美团的到店业务,也都不同程度地遭遇竞争对手的“突袭”,其中抖音带来的冲击最为显著。对于外卖大战的主要参与者来说,水面之下的威胁,也许比看得见的竞争更为严峻。

注:文/定焦One团队,文章来源:定焦One,本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:定焦One

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0