广告
加载中

外卖大战一年后 拼多多成最“佛系”赢家

做镜观天 2026-06-09 12:11
做镜观天 2026/06/09 12:11

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文梳理了2025年京东入场外卖引发的三巨头外卖大战全过程,核心结论是这场战争已经重构中国电商底层格局,未参战的拼多多成为佛系赢家,核心干货如下:

1. 大战本质不是争抢外卖份额,而是争夺全品类即时零售的新赛道,餐饮只是获客入口,行业仅用半年就完成了从餐饮配送到全品类即时零售的战略跃迁。

2. 不同平台选择了不同的竞争策略:美团守住中高客单价利润池,阿里把外卖当做全平台获客杠杆,京东主打品质差异化心智,抖音转做轻模式错位竞争。

3. 普通用户能感知的变化:用户购物习惯已经改变,“马上拿到”的需求越来越多,购物选择中“快”的权重已经超过“省”,未来零售会越来越贴近消费者。

本次外卖大战背后的即时零售浪潮,给品牌商带来了清晰的消费趋势和渠道机会,核心干货如下:

1. 消费趋势:当前即时零售市场规模已经接近3万亿,2025年增速达21.4%,远高于整体电商8%的增速,非餐品类迎来爆发式增长,其中粮油米面订单增长335%,家庭清洁增长324%,用户对“快”的需求大幅提升,高频低决策成本品类正在加速向即时零售迁移。

2. 渠道机会:多个平台都在开放新招商,阿里推出3000家淘宝便利店计划和200个核心高校商圈合作计划,京东招募高品质餐饮及全品类商家,抖音筛选优质堂食商家,小红书适合美妆、家居、母婴等高溢价品类布局。

3. 价格与利润提示:10-15元低客单价区间补贴战惨烈,利润极薄,30元以上中高客单价市场仍有稳定利润空间,用户愿意为品牌和生活方式支付溢价。

外卖大战催生的即时零售风口,给各类卖家带来了新的增长机会,同时也需要注意风险规避,核心干货如下:

1. 增长机会:即时零售是当前电商行业增速最快的赛道,目前一线城市渗透率刚超10%,二三线城市是主要增量市场,非餐全品类都有增量空间,医药、3C、宠物、美妆等品类需求增长快,多个平台都推出了招商扶持政策,京东入场初期免佣金,阿里开放高校商圈流量,抖音错位竞争留出了中小商家生存空间。

2. 风险提示:低客单价10-15元区间补贴内卷严重,利润极薄,不建议盲目进入;当前监管已经启动反内卷专项行动,补贴大战逐步趋于稳定,不要过度依赖平台补贴生存。

3. 平台选择建议:中高品质定位的商家可以布局美团、京东,兴趣种草类商家可以布局抖音、小红书,性价比品类可以继续深耕拼多多。

即时零售的爆发给工厂带来了新的需求变化和转型方向,核心干货如下:

1. 产品生产设计需求变化:即时零售带动即时性消费需求爆发,高频日用品、食品饮料、医药、美妆、3C小件等品类订单增速快,非餐品类中粮油米面、家庭清洁订单增长均超过300%,工厂可以适配即时消费特点,调整SKU规格、包装设计,开发适配小批量即时消费的产品。

2. 新商业机会:即时零售渠道快速扩张,多个平台都在拓展全品类商家,工厂可以直接对接即时零售渠道,缩短流通链路,更快响应用户需求变化,还可以抓住二三线城市即时零售渗透率提升的增量风口。

3. 转型启示:行业竞争已经转向数字化履约竞争,工厂需要加快数字化转型,升级库存管理、快速响应能力,适配即时零售对供应链效率的要求,提升自身的渠道适配能力。

外卖大战推动即时零售行业快速发展,给服务商带来了新的市场机会,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:即时零售已经从单一餐饮配送拓展到全品类,2025年市场规模近3万亿,一线城市渗透率刚超10%,二三线是主要增量市场,行业空间广阔,履约配送是即时零售的核心壁垒,轻模式平台对第三方履约的需求很高。

2. 客户核心痛点:无论是新入场的平台还是中小商家,都普遍存在履约能力不足的问题,抖音做即时零售就是受限于自建配送能力不足,只能依托第三方,中小商家也没有能力自建配送和数字化调度体系,库存管理、订单调度都是普遍痛点。

3. 解决方案机会:服务商可以布局第三方履约配送业务,满足轻模式平台和中小商家的配送需求;也可以开发适配即时零售的数字化库存调度、订单管理系统,帮助商家提升运营效率;内容种草服务商也可以对接小红书、抖音的内容生态,服务品牌商家的种草需求。

这场外卖大战给平台商留下了很多可借鉴的经验,也明确了需要规避的风险,核心干货如下:

1. 行业需求方向:用户即时性消费习惯已经不可逆养成,全品类即时零售是未来零售的核心战场,竞争核心是离消费者的距离,远场电商和近场即时零售协同可以明显提升平台获客能力和用户活跃度,阿里的实践验证了这点。

2. 运营与招商经验:多个平台的不同路径都验证了可行方向:阿里统一远场和近场业务管理实现协同,美团守住中高客单价利润池避开泡沫,京东主打品质差异化心智,抖音依托第三方做错位竞争,当前布局便利店、高校商圈、下沉市场是新的拓展方向,招商可以重点倾斜这些领域。

3. 风险规避:单纯烧钱补贴换份额的内卷模式不可持续,已经触发监管的反内卷专项行动,履约配送能力是核心壁垒,没有长期积累不要盲目开展时效军备竞赛,低客单价的份额只是泡沫,无法带来稳定利润,不要盲目争抢。

2025年的外卖大战是中国电商格局重构的标志性事件,呈现出很多产业新动向和新的商业模式探索,核心干货如下:

1. 产业新动向:传统电商的行业边界已经被打破,远场传统电商和近场即时零售正在加速融合,即时零售增速远超传统电商,正在不可逆地改变零售业的成本结构,竞争核心从价格战转向履约能力和贴近消费者的能力,不同基因的平台走差异化路线都获得了成长空间,未参战的拼多多依托极致性价比护城河保持了增速。

2. 行业新问题:单纯烧钱补贴的内卷式竞争不仅无法持续获得稳定利润,还引发了监管介入,流量优势无法替代履约能力,内容平台做重模式即时零售存在难以跨越的履约鸿沟。

3. 商业模式创新:本次大战诞生了多个可研究的创新模式:阿里的“外卖获客+全电商变现”的LTV模式,抖音的“内容种草+第三方履约”错位竞争模式,小红书的“种草流量+开放合作+渐进闭环”模式,都为行业提供了新的研究样本。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article walks through the full story of the 2025 "big three" food delivery war triggered by JD.com’s entry into the sector. Its core conclusion is that this competition has already reshaped the underlying landscape of China’s e-commerce industry, with Pinduoduo — the non-participant platform — emerging as an unexpected passive winner. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. The war is not fundamentally a battle for food delivery market share, but a race to dominate the new all-category instant retail track. Food service is just a customer acquisition channel, and the entire industry completed its strategic shift from food delivery to all-category instant retail in just six months.

2. Different platforms have adopted distinct competitive strategies: Meituan is defending its profit pool of mid-to-high average order value (AOV) customers; Alibaba uses food delivery as a customer acquisition lever for its entire ecosystem; JD focuses on building a brand positioning of quality differentiation; Douyin (TikTok China) pursues a light-asset model to compete in an untapped niche.

3. Changes visible to ordinary consumers: User shopping habits have already shifted, with demand for "instant gratification" growing rapidly. "Speed" now outweighs "low price" as a top decision factor for shoppers, and retail will continue to become increasingly consumer-centric going forward.

The instant retail wave behind the 2025 food delivery war has brought clear consumer trends and channel opportunities for brands. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Consumer trends: China’s instant retail market is already close to 3 trillion yuan in size, with a projected 21.4% growth rate in 2025 — far outpacing the 8% growth of overall e-commerce. Non-food categories are seeing explosive growth: orders for grain, oil, rice and flour are up 335%, and household cleaning products are up 324%. Demand for speed has risen sharply, and high-frequency, low-decision-cost categories are accelerating their shift to instant retail.

2. Channel opportunities: Multiple platforms are opening new merchant recruitment programs: Alibaba has launched an initiative to open 3,000 Taobao convenience stores and partner with 200 core university business districts; JD is recruiting high-quality food and all-category merchants; Douyin is curating premium dine-in restaurants; and Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book) is well-suited for high-margin categories including beauty, home goods and baby products.

3. Pricing and profit notes: The 10-15 yuan low-AOV segment is seeing cutthroat subsidized competition with razor-thin margins, while the mid-to-high AOV market above 30 yuan still offers stable profit margins, as consumers are willing to pay a premium for trusted brands and lifestyle alignment.

The instant retail boom spawned by the food delivery war has created new growth opportunities for all types of sellers, along with risks to avoid. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Growth opportunities: Instant retail is the fastest-growing track in China’s e-commerce industry today. Its penetration rate in first-tier cities has just passed 10%, and second- and third-tier cities represent the main source of incremental growth. All non-food categories have room for expansion, with pharmaceuticals, 3C electronics, pet products and beauty seeing particularly strong demand growth. Multiple platforms are offering merchant incentives: JD waives commission fees for new merchants in its early entry stage; Alibaba opens up traffic from university business districts; and Douyin’s niche positioning leaves room for small and medium-sized sellers to operate.

2. Risk warnings: The 10-15 yuan low-AOV segment faces severe subsidized competition with extremely thin margins, so blind entry is not recommended. Regulators have already launched a special anti-involution campaign, so the subsidy war will gradually stabilize, and sellers should not rely excessively on platform subsidies to survive.

3. Platform selection advice: Sellers positioned for mid-to-high quality products can enter Meituan and JD; content and discovery-focused sellers can enter Douyin and Xiaohongshu; value-for-money categories can continue to deepen their presence on Pinduoduo.

The boom in instant retail has created new demand shifts and transformation directions for manufacturers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Changes in product design and production demand: Instant retail has driven an explosion in on-demand consumer demand, with orders for high-frequency daily goods, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, beauty, and small 3C electronics growing rapidly. Among non-food categories, orders for grain, oil, rice, flour and household cleaning products have all grown by more than 300%. Factories can adapt their offerings to instant consumption characteristics by adjusting SKU specifications and packaging design, and developing products tailored for small-batch on-demand consumption.

2. New business opportunities: As the instant retail channel expands rapidly and multiple platforms are recruiting all-category merchants, factories can connect directly to instant retail channels to shorten distribution links, respond faster to changing consumer demand, and capture incremental growth from rising penetration in second- and third-tier cities.

3. Transformation insights: Industry competition has shifted to digital fulfillment capability. Factories need to accelerate digital transformation, upgrade inventory management and rapid response capabilities, adapt to the supply chain efficiency requirements of instant retail, and improve their ability to adapt to new channel demands.

The food delivery war has driven rapid growth of the instant retail industry, creating new market opportunities for service providers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: Instant retail has expanded from pure food delivery to full-category services, with a 2025 market size nearing 3 trillion yuan. Penetration in first-tier cities has just exceeded 10%, with second- and third-tier cities representing the main growth market, leaving massive room for industry expansion. Fulfillment and delivery are the core barrier to entry in instant retail, and light-asset platforms have very high demand for third-party fulfillment services.

2. Core customer pain points: Both new platform entrants and small and medium-sized merchants generally lack sufficient in-house fulfillment capacity. Douyin’s instant retail push, for example, is constrained by limited in-house delivery capacity, forcing it to rely on third parties. Small and medium-sized merchants also cannot afford to build their own delivery and digital scheduling systems, leaving inventory management and order dispatch as common pain points.

3. Opportunity for solutions: Service providers can build out third-party fulfillment and delivery businesses to meet the needs of light-asset platforms and small and medium-sized merchants; they can also develop digital inventory scheduling and order management systems tailored for instant retail to help merchants improve operational efficiency; content marketing service providers can also tap into the content ecosystems of Xiaohongshu and Douyin to serve brands’ marketing and discovery needs.

This food delivery war offers many actionable lessons for platform operators and clarifies risks to avoid. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry demand direction: Consumers’ instant consumption habits have become permanently entrenched, and all-category instant retail is the core battlefield for the future of retail. The core of competition is proximity to consumers. Alibaba’s practice has verified that combining long-distance e-commerce and near-field instant retail can significantly improve a platform’s customer acquisition capability and user activity.

2. Operations and merchant recruitment lessons: The different paths taken by multiple platforms have confirmed several viable strategies: Alibaba unified long-distance and near-field business management to achieve synergy; Meituan defended its mid-to-high AOV profit pool to avoid unsustainable growth; JD focused on building a quality differentiation positioning; Douyin pursued niche competition relying on third-party fulfillment. Convenience stores, university business districts and lower-tier markets are emerging new expansion directions, so merchant recruitment can prioritize these areas.

3. Risk avoidance: The involution model of simply burning cash on subsidies to gain market share is unsustainable, and has already triggered targeted anti-involution regulation from authorities. Fulfillment and delivery capability is the core barrier, so do not blindly enter an arms race for faster delivery speed without long-term accumulated capacity. Low-AOV market share is just unsustainable泡沫growth that cannot deliver stable profits, so do not chase it blindly.

The 2025 food delivery war is a defining event reshaping China’s e-commerce landscape, revealing many new industry trends and innovative business model experiments. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New industry trends: The traditional boundaries of e-commerce have been broken, and long-distance traditional e-commerce and near-field instant retail are accelerating their integration. Instant retail is growing far faster than traditional e-commerce, and is permanently changing the cost structure of the retail industry. Competition has shifted from price wars to fulfillment capability and proximity to consumers. Platforms with different core competencies have all found room for growth through differentiated strategies, while non-participant Pinduoduo has maintained its growth依托ing its moat of extreme value for money.

2. New industry problems: Involutionary competition relying purely on cash-burning subsidies cannot deliver sustained stable profits, and has triggered regulatory intervention. Traffic advantage cannot replace fulfillment capability, and content platforms face hard-to-cross fulfillment gaps when pursuing asset-heavy instant retail models.

3. Innovative business models: The war has produced several innovative models worthy of study: Alibaba’s LTV model of "food delivery customer acquisition + full e-commerce monetization", Douyin’s niche competition model of "content discovery + third-party fulfillment", and Xiaohongshu’s model of "discovery traffic + open collaboration + gradual closed loop" — all provide new research samples for the industry.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

三家一年烧掉1500亿,日均外卖从9000万单推到2亿单,美团份额从75%跌到50%,但真正被改变的,不是谁送了更多外卖,而是整个中国电商的底层坐标被重置了。另外,不搞外卖的拼多多反而成了“佛系”赢家。

首席认为,这场战争的本质,早已超越了“谁家外卖更便宜”的浅层竞争。

当京东带着“品质外卖”的口号入场时,美团在4月迅速将“美团闪购”升级为独立品牌;阿里系则在4月底将“小时达”业务全面升级为“淘宝闪购”。三巨头的动作几乎同步——他们都明白,餐饮只是入口,全品类即时零售才是真正的战场。

数据不会说谎。2025年7月,大战达到峰值:美团宣布日订单超1.2亿单,淘宝闪购突破8000万单。更关键的是,非餐品类开始爆发式增长——粮油米面订单增长335%,家庭清洁增长324%,3C数码增长129%。

从餐饮配送到全品类即时零售,这场战略跃迁只用了不到半年时间。

今天,让我们一起回顾梳理一下这场战争,一切都要从去年开始。

真正的变局不在外卖,而在电商

外卖市场曾经是世界上最无聊的双寡头游戏。美团65%,饿了么33%,剩下2%是凑数的。两家公司默契地维持着一种"温和竞争"——你涨点佣金,我跟着涨;你搞个会员,我也搞一个。这个市场像是一局下了十年还没分出胜负的围棋,双方都懒得落子了。

但,不动,不是不想动,而是缺少一个契机,京东想杀入局,阿里更想动一动。

2025年2月,京东宣布招募餐饮外卖商家,免佣金、高额补贴、给骑手交五险一金。40天日订单破百万,6月峰值冲到2500万单。京东的逻辑简单粗暴:用品质外卖撕开一道口子,用物流网络把口子撑大。

阿里那边反应更快。4月,淘宝"小时达"全面升级为"淘宝闪购",直接拿到淘宝App首页一级入口。饿了么同步推出"饿补超百亿",5月26日就宣布日订单突破4000万。

战局迅速失控。7月,淘宝闪购单日补贴超过12亿元,美团跟进了3-4亿。8月,淘宝闪购借着"秋天的第一杯奶茶"的营销,单日订单峰值冲到1.2亿单。美团反手就把峰值推到了1.5亿。三家平台的餐饮外卖日均订单总和一度突破2亿单——而战前这个数字只有八九千万。

烧钱的速度有多疯狂?2025年Q3,三家单季净利润同比全部腰斩。三家盈利公司同时主动把利润烧掉一半以上,中国互联网历史上从未有过。

美团丢了14个百分点的订单份额,但GMV份额仍高达60%。丢掉的份额集中在10-15元的低客单价区间——那是补贴最惨烈、利润最薄的战场。在30元以上的正餐市场,美团依然占据绝对统治力。

换句话说,美团让出的是泡沫,守住的是利润池。这就像一场拳击赛,对手每一拳都打在护具上,点数在涨,但下巴从来没挨过重击。

01从首席的角度:没有赢家的战争,各有各的"赢"法

美团是防守方,但防守打得最贵。2025年Q3和Q4,核心本地商业营收连续两个季度同比下滑——在外卖大战最激烈的时候,营收增速是最诚实的补贴温度计。Q3单季经营亏损超百亿,这是美团历史上从未出现过的数字。

美团最初判断这场仗一年额外支出150-200亿补贴就够了。结果单季度就烧掉了这个数。一位美团内部人士透露,S-team成员(此前多年不参与财务月会)开始一同参会,关注每一分钱的补贴流向。美团低估了对手的决心,阿里高管在一对一沟通会上说得很直白:对外卖补贴的投入"不设上限",因为"不能让竞争对手知道我们的底线"。

但美团也拿到了它最想要的:中高客单价市场的壁垒没有崩塌。2026Q1财报显示,不含非餐闪购的纯餐饮外卖UE(单均盈亏)在4、5月份已经转正。更关键的是,美团闪购2025年GMV达2620亿元,预计2026年突破4000亿——这是美团从"送饭的"变成"送万物的"的核心筹码。

对阿里来说,外卖从来不是目的,外卖是电商获客的杠杆,首席对这点是看好的。淘宝闪购在过去一年实现超速增长,单季即时零售收入208.42亿元,同比暴增56%,月度交易买家数一度飙到3亿。更重要的是,蒋凡在财报电话会上明确表示,即时零售与传统电商的协同效应体现在"推动获客、提升用户活跃度、满足多元化消费需求、增加交易量"等多个维度。

淘宝闪购不是在跟美团打外卖战,而是在帮淘宝天猫打流量战。一单9块9的奶茶补贴,换来的可能是一个用户从此在淘宝上买衣服、买家电、买一切。这个账,用外卖UE永远算不平,但用电商LTV(客户整体周期价值)就算得过来了。

在用户心智上,即时零售的DAU(日活跃用户数)从几乎为零到稳定过亿,这些用户已经形成了在淘宝上点外卖、买生鲜、购药的习惯;

在市场份额上,淘宝闪购目前每天日订单量在6000万单上下(包括餐饮和非餐即时零售,这里面包括盒马和天猫超市的半日达订单),市场份额从一年前的20%增长至超过40%。

2025年6月,饿了么和飞猪正式并入阿里中国电商事业群。12月,饿了么App更名为"淘宝闪购"。组织架构上,"远场电商"(淘宝天猫)和"近场零售"(饿了么/闪购)实现了统一指挥。阿里第一次把即时零售塞进了电商的发动机舱里,不再让它作为独立业务靠自己造血。

很多人说阿里今年补贴力度明显减弱,外卖大战应该接近尾声了。但是阿里并不这么认为,淘宝闪购最近更是再出两记“重拳”——淘宝便利店要开3000家,节奏提速;推出高校商圈合作计划,首批锁定200个核心高校商圈,瞄准9月开学季。两件事其实对应的是同一个信号,阿里即时零售的第二阶段开始了。

有媒体认为最早点燃这场“大火”的京东却也是最早出局的,事实真是如此吗?

京东是三家里面花钱最少的,也是基数最低的。日均1000万单的外卖体量,相当于战前饿了么的一半,在外卖市场算是拿到了一张站票。350亿买一张入场券,贵不贵?取决于你问的是外卖部门还是整个京东集团。

对外卖部门来说,350亿砸出日均千万单,这个获客成本只能用"可怕"形容。但对京东集团来说,外卖是本地生活生态的最后一环——京东秒送、京东七鲜、京东外卖、美食团购,拼在一起才是一张完整的"到家+到店"版图。2026年4月,京东上线"美食团购",标志着从"送外卖"延伸到"到店消费",本地生活闭环正在合拢。

在首席看来,京东的差异化在于"品质"标签。宜家家居、小米、沃尔玛等高品质商户入驻京东秒送,客单价全行业最高。京东打的不是规模战,是心智战,"在京东点外卖"这件事本身,就是一种品质背书。

02电商江湖边界开始模糊

第一,远场电商(传统电商)正在被近场零售(即时零售)"截胡"。

以前用户买一瓶洗发水的路径是:打开淘宝→搜索→比价→下单→等快递。现在变成了:打开美团/淘宝闪购→搜附近的屈臣氏/超市→下单→30分钟送到。当"马上想要"的需求越来越多,当3C数码和日用品都能半小时到家,"多快好省"四个字的权重正在发生历史性迁移:"快"的权重急剧上升,"省"的相对吸引力在下降。

这不是说淘宝天猫和京东的电商基本盘会崩塌——远场电商还有巨大的长尾商品优势——但高频率、低决策成本的品类(日用品、食品饮料、医药、美妆)正在加速向即时零售迁移。2025年即时零售市场规模达29852亿元,同比增长21.4%,而整体电商增速已放缓至8%左右。剪刀差还在扩大。

第二、抖音选择“低调发育”选择最适合自己赛道。抖音曾经是最让人恐惧的变量。2023年,中国电商格局就已经发生标志性变化,抖音电商以3.5万亿元GMV超越京东,与天猫、拼多多形成“新三强”格局。

2023年高调宣布要做外卖,一度定下1000亿GMV的目标。但一年后,抖音外卖已经实质性退潮,战略重心转向"抖音小时达"——一个更轻的、不需要自建骑手网络的即时零售模式。抖音小时达在即时零售市场的份额仅1.5%,几乎可以忽略不计。

抖音踩过的坑教科书中总结了:流量可以卖广告,但很难送外卖。 美团有百万骑手,阿里有蜂鸟配送,京东有达达和自营物流——这些是十年时间、数千亿投入磨出来的。抖音可以用算法让用户冲动下单,但"下单"和"送到"之间隔着十万个骑手、仓库和调度系统的差距。抖音教会了美团如何做内容营销,美团教会了抖音什么叫履约鸿沟。

2026年3月,抖音将"随心团"更名为"抖音即送",标志着外卖业务进入常态化运营。不过全部依赖第三方履约,避开与美团、饿了么的"时效军备竞赛";同一团购套餐支持"到店验券"和"配送到家"双选择;只筛选优质堂食商家,不做全品类扩张。

这本质上是一种差异化错位竞争,抖音知道自己打不过美团的配送网络,所以用"内容种草+团购到家"的组合拳,切的是"计划性外卖"而非"即时性外卖"。

2026年2月,抖音上线独立团购App“抖省省”没有短视频、没有直播,只有极简的团购与到店服务入口。

这背后的逻辑是当兴趣电商红利见顶,本地生活需要脱离对算法和爆款内容的依赖,走向更稳定、可规模化的交易闭环。这与抖音电商从"兴趣电商"到"全域兴趣电商"(货架占比50%)的演进路径完全一致。

2026年抖音选择"慢下来"不是退缩,而是从"闪电战"转向"阵地战",用独立App、深耕商户、提升核销率来构建更可持续的本地生活生态。

第三,拼多多成了最"佛系"的赢家。

外卖大战打了一年,拼多多全程没有参与。没有外卖,没有即时零售,没有骑手网络。但2026年Q1拼多多的营收增速(11%)在五大电商中排名第一,Temu全球月活突破5.16亿,GMV预计突破1000亿美元。高盛预测拼多多电商份额维持在20%左右。

拼多多的逻辑是另一个维度的竞争,极致性价比+农产品自营+全球化,这三个引擎都不依赖于"快"。一个买10块钱30卷卫生纸的用户,不在乎是30分钟送到还是3天送到。拼多多恰好避开了即时零售的射程,它的护城河是"省",而美团闪购的护城河是"快",两条河不在同一个平面上。

第四,小红书不容忽视的兴趣电商挑战者。

小红书GMV虽然在呈现两位数快速增长,但是目前五六千亿GMV的规模,显然还构不成对老大哥们的挑战。不过故事的另一面却是小红书拥有连抖音都曾拥有的优势,传统电商的逻辑是"人找货"(搜索-比价-下单),抖音是"货找人"(算法推荐-冲动消费),而小红书是"生活方式找人"(内容共鸣-信任建立-自然转化)。

购买是内容消费的副产品。用户经过充分"种草"决策,非冲动消费;美妆、家居、母婴等品类客单价显著高于抖音;用户为"生活方式"付费,而非单纯为"功能"付费,品牌溢价更强。

但小红书也有自己的问题,内容社区的广告覆盖率是有上限的,就算是小红书自认为是种草平台,但大部分人还是来消费优质内容的。所以小红书的商业化是主流平台里面启动最晚最为谨慎的。

小红书承认自己供应链、物流、支付体系远弱于阿里京东,于是用"种草流量"换取"广告收入+数据能力"选择跟阿里和美团合作,同时保持站内电商闭环作为"第二曲线"。

写在最后

2026年Q1,三家的补贴力度都在明显收窄。美团销售费用从300多亿降到约230亿,阿里的钱更多烧向了AI,京东的净利润基本回到开战前水平。监管也在持续加码,从2025年7月的约谈,到2026年3月的"外卖大战该结束了"的定调文章,再到5月启动的"反内卷"专项行动。外卖大战的市场份额波动在今年应该会趋于稳定了,我们首席商业评论希望看到更多基于AI技术和仓配模式的升级迭代而非单纯烧钱。

从更广大的视角来看,2025年即时零售渗透率在一线城市已超10%,二三线城市是主要增量市场。品类从餐饮扩展到医药、3C、宠物、美妆、家居。当用户习惯了30分钟拿到一盒退烧药、一个手机充电器、一束花,这个习惯就会不可逆地改变整个零售业的成本结构。未来零售的竞争,不是"线上还是线下",而是"谁能离消费者更近"。

参考资料:

阿里内部复盘外卖大战 来源:晚点LatePost

阿里即时零售全面提速 来源:灵兽

部分资料来自于AI收集

注:文/做镜观天,文章来源:首席商业评论(公众号ID:chreview),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:首席商业评论

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0