广告
加载中

九号公司胜诉!竞争对手恶意诋毁构成侵权

亿邦动力 2026-06-02 17:32
亿邦动力 2026/06/02 17:32

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心信息是九号公司起诉竞品代理商自媒体商业诋毁胜诉,同时分享了应对网络侵权的实操干货,具体如下:

1.本次案件是九号公司半年内第三起名誉权维权胜诉案,九号公司已经跑通完整的维权方法论,建立了监测—锁定—固证—法律评估—起诉的标准化维权流程,随着流程成熟,维权周期大幅缩短。

2.当前网络上已经出现产业化的不正当竞争黑产,常见形式为有组织造谣矩阵、批量养号控评、竞品定向攻击,这类行为不仅坑害合法企业,也会误导普通消费者。

3.目前监管层通过净网、清朗行动从严打击这类乱象,比亚迪、华为等头部企业都采取硬刚态度,普通主体遇到类似侵权也可参考这套标准化流程维权。

本文能给品牌商应对恶意竞争、维护品牌商誉提供不少干货参考,具体如下:

1.当前品牌线上竞争已经出现新的风险,竞品会通过雇佣黑产、授权代理商等方式,制作贬低内容、批量养号控评,实现定向攻击,这种行为已经产业化,并非零星纠纷,品牌需要提前警惕防范。

2.九号公司摸索出的标准化维权体系可直接参考,品牌可自建监测—锁定—固证—法律评估—起诉的全流程,随着流程跑通,维权效率会大幅提升,减少资源消耗。

3.当前监管层明确从严打击这类黑产,司法判例也支持高额度赔偿,头部品牌都采取取证起诉、不和解的策略,品牌面对侵权无需妥协,坚决维权能有效威慑对手,保护自身品牌商誉。

本文能给卖家揭示当前经营环境的风险与机会,还有可落地的应对方法,具体如下:

1.政策层面,当前监管通过净网、清朗行动从严从重打击网络黑水军、恶意诋毁等不正当竞争行为,明确护住企业的名誉权、公平竞争权、正常经营权,政策利好合法经营的卖家。

2.风险提示:当前不正当竞争已经呈现产业化、规模化特征,卖家很容易遭遇竞品的定向恶意攻击,若应对不当会严重损害自身商誉,影响正常经营,需要提前防范。

3.卖家可学习九号公司的经验,搭建标准化的维权流程,面对侵权采取硬刚态度,借助法律和监管的力量打击侵权行为,维护自身的正常经营秩序,避免无端消耗资源。

本文给想要拓展线上业务、做自有品牌的工厂提供了不少启示,具体如下:

1.当前线上商业竞争中,出现了竞品依托黑产恶意诋毁的产业化乱象,工厂布局自有品牌线上渠道时,要提前警惕这类不正当竞争风险,避免商誉受损后影响整体生产和销售布局。

2.九号公司跑通的标准化维权流程,对工厂搭建自身风险应对体系有很高参考价值,工厂可提前参照这套监测—锁定—固证—法律评估—起诉的流程,搭建应对机制,出现侵权后能快速处理,缩短周期,减少损失。

3.目前监管层从严打击这类黑产乱象,整体经营环境对合法经营的工厂更友好,工厂可以放心把资源投入到产品生产、设计研发环节,不用过度担心被恶意攻击消耗过多资源。

本文给面向企业提供舆情、法务等服务的服务商揭示了新的行业需求和业务机会,具体如下:

1.行业发展新趋势:当前网络黑水军已经形成产业化,大量企业尤其是品牌企业都面临竞品恶意诋毁、商誉受损的问题,传统零散的应对方式已经无法满足需求,企业对系统化、标准化的商誉维权服务需求大幅提升。

2.客户核心痛点:企业面对有组织的造谣矩阵、批量养号控评、竞品定向攻击,大多缺乏成套成熟的应对流程,往往消耗了大量资源却达不到好的效果,还会影响正常的产品研发节奏,急需成熟的解决方案。

3.服务商可参考九号公司总结的标准化维权流程,开发对应的标准化服务产品,帮助企业快速处理商誉侵权问题,抓住这一新的业务增长机会。

本文给各类内容平台、电商平台的运营管理和风险规避带来不少启示,具体如下:

1.当前平台内已经出现黑产批量养号、发布不实内容恶意诋毁商家竞品的乱象,这类行为不仅破坏平台内的公平竞争秩序,还会误导消费者,损害平台的口碑和用户信任,平台需要重视这类风险,提前做好规避。

2.平台可配合监管部门的净网、清朗行动,优化平台规则,加强对平台内账号的监测管理,及时封禁打击批量养号控评、恶意造谣的黑灰产账号,维护平台内健康的经营环境。

3.打造公平健康的经营环境,也能吸引更多合法经营的品牌和卖家入驻,有利于平台的招商工作,提升平台整体的竞争力和用户信任度,对平台长期发展有很大帮助。

本文给研究互联网产业竞争、不正当竞争治理的研究者提供了新的研究素材和方向,具体如下:

1.产业出现新动向新问题,互联网领域的不正当竞争已经从早期的零星个人行为,演变为产业化、规模化的黑灰产生态,具体表现为有组织的造谣矩阵、批量养号控评、竞品定向攻击,严重破坏市场秩序,是需要深入研究的新产业问题。

2.实践层面也出现了新动向,当前头部企业已经从过去的隐忍应对转为集体硬刚,九号公司摸索出了可复制的标准化企业维权流程,司法和监管层面都明确了从严打击的方向,比亚迪三案合计判赔超226万就是典型的标志性案例。

3.研究者可以围绕企业维权模式优化、黑灰产治理的监管路径、长效治理机制等方向展开研究,有着很强的现实意义和研究价值。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article highlights Ninebot’s recent victory in a commercial defamation lawsuit filed against a competitor’s agent and self-media operator, while sharing practical insights for handling online intellectual property infringements:

1. This case marks Ninebot’s third successful reputation rights defense lawsuit in six months. The company has developed a complete, standardized rights protection methodology spanning monitoring, target identification, evidence preservation, legal evaluation, and litigation. The process has matured to deliver significant reductions in the total timeline for resolving infringements.

2. An industrialized black market for unfair competition has emerged online, with common tactics including organized rumor-mongering networks, mass account farming and review manipulation, and targeted attacks on competitors. These practices not only harm legitimate businesses but also mislead consumers.

3. Regulators are cracking down on these malpractices through the "Clean Web" and "Clear Atmosphere" campaigns. Leading companies including BYD and Huawei have adopted a firm stance against such infringements, and ordinary entities facing similar issues can reference Ninebot’s standardized process to protect their rights.

This article provides actionable insights for brands looking to counter malicious competition and protect their brand reputation:

1. Brands now face new risks in online competition: Competitors increasingly hire black market operators or use authorized agents to launch targeted attacks by publishing smear content and manipulating reviews via mass farmed accounts. These practices are already industrialized rather than isolated incidents, requiring proactive vigilance from brands.

2. Ninebot’s standardized rights protection framework can be directly adapted by brands. Companies can build their own end-to-end process covering monitoring, target identification, evidence preservation, legal evaluation, and litigation. Once the workflow is optimized, rights protection efficiency will improve sharply, reducing overall resource consumption.

3. Regulators have clearly committed to strict crackdowns on these black market activities, and judicial precedents now support high damage awards. Leading brands have adopted a strategy of collecting evidence, filing suit, and refusing out-of-court settlements. Brands need not compromise when facing infringement; firm action effectively deters opponents and protects brand reputation.

This article outlines current operating risks and opportunities for sellers, along with actionable response strategies:

1. On the policy front, regulators are cracking down heavily on unfair competition practices including black cyber armies and malicious defamation through the "Clean Web" and "Clear Atmosphere" campaigns, explicitly protecting enterprises’ rights to reputation, fair competition, and legitimate operation. This policy environment benefits law-abiding sellers.

2. A risk reminder: Unfair competition has become industrialized and scaled, leaving sellers vulnerable to targeted malicious attacks from competitors. Improper responses can severely damage reputation and disrupt normal operations, so proactive precaution is necessary.

3. Sellers can learn from Ninebot’s experience to build a standardized rights protection process, adopt a firm stance against infringement, and leverage legal and regulatory support to crack down on violations. This protects normal operations and avoids unnecessary resource drain.

This article offers key insights for factories looking to expand online business and build their own brands:

1. In today’s online business competition, industrialized malicious defamation by competitors via black market operators has become common. Factories building online owned-brand channels need to proactively guard against this type of unfair competition risk to avoid damage to reputation that could disrupt overall production and sales strategies.

2. Ninebot’s proven standardized rights protection process is highly valuable reference for factories building their own risk response systems. Factories can pre-construct response mechanisms following the monitoring, identification, evidence preservation, legal evaluation, litigation framework, enabling faster resolution of infringement cases, shorter processing cycles, and reduced losses.

3. Regulators’ strict crackdown on these black market malpractices has created a more friendly operating environment for law-abiding factories. Factories can confidently invest resources in product manufacturing, design, and R&D without excessive concern about resource drain from malicious attacks.

This article identifies new industry demands and business opportunities for service providers offering corporate public opinion and legal services:

1. A new industry trend: As cyber mercenary black markets become industrialized, large numbers of enterprises (especially brand owners) face problems of malicious defamation by competitors and reputation damage. Traditional scattered response methods can no longer meet demand, driving a sharp increase in enterprise demand for systematic, standardized reputation rights protection services.

2. Core pain points for clients: Most enterprises lack mature, end-to-end response processes to counter organized rumor networks, mass account farming and review manipulation, and targeted competitor attacks. They often expend significant resources without achieving effective results, and even disrupt normal product R&D timelines, creating urgent demand for proven solutions.

3. Service providers can reference Ninebot’s summarized standardized rights protection process to develop corresponding standardized service products, helping enterprises resolve reputation infringement issues quickly and capture this new business growth opportunity.

This article offers actionable insights for operation management and risk mitigation for content and e-commerce platforms:

1. Black market actors have already created widespread problems on platforms, using mass farmed accounts to publish false content and maliciously defame competing merchants. These practices not only undermine fair competition on the platform but also mislead consumers, eroding platform reputation and user trust. Platforms need to prioritize this risk and take proactive preventive action.

2. Platforms can align with regulators’ "Clean Web" and "Clear Atmosphere" campaigns by updating platform rules, strengthening monitoring and management of platform accounts, and quickly banning black market accounts engaged in mass account farming, review manipulation, and malicious rumor-mongering to maintain a healthy operating environment on the platform.

3. Building a fair and healthy operating environment also attracts more law-abiding brands and sellers, supports platform merchant acquisition efforts, improves overall platform competitiveness and user trust, and delivers long-term benefits for sustainable platform growth.

This article provides new research materials and directions for scholars studying internet industry competition and unfair competition governance:

1. New industry developments and problems have emerged: Unfair competition in the internet space has evolved from isolated individual actions into an industrialized, scaled black and gray market ecosystem. Key manifestations include organized rumor networks, mass account farming and review manipulation, and targeted competitor attacks, which severely disrupt market order and represent a new industrial problem requiring in-depth research.

2. New practical developments have also emerged: Leading enterprises have shifted from a traditionally cautious approach to collective firm action. Ninebot has developed a replicable standardized corporate rights protection process, while judicial and regulatory authorities have clearly committed to strict crackdowns. A notable landmark example is BYD’s three cases, which resulted in a total damage award of over 2.26 million RMB.

3. Researchers can pursue high-impact, practically relevant work exploring directions including optimization of corporate rights protection models, regulatory approaches for black and gray market governance, and long-term effective governance mechanisms.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

法院认定,被告作为极核品牌代理商,长期制作视频贬低竞争对手,损害了九号公司的商业信誉和商品声誉,已构成商业诋毁。

【亿邦原创】亿邦动力从九号公司处获悉,该公司起诉自媒体账号“黄不慌唐_”(下称被告)网络名誉权侵权/不正当竞争纠纷一案,一审法院作出判决,九号公司胜诉。法院认定,被告作为极核品牌代理商,长期制作视频贬低竞争对手,损害了九号公司的商业信誉和商品声誉,已构成商业诋毁。

这是半年内九号公司的第三起名誉权维权胜诉案件。该公司目前从个案试水到流程跑通,已经跑通一套维权方法论。九号公司相关负责人介绍,团队已建立“监测—锁定—固证—法律评估—起诉”的标准化流程,从第一例的摸索到第二例的高效推进,周期显著缩短。

纳恩博公司系本案起诉主体

“对于捏造虚假信息、组织恶意刷评等损害公司商誉的侵权行为,我们将坚决运用法律武器,一查到底,绝不姑息。” 该负责人称,有组织的造谣矩阵、批量养号控评、竞品定向攻击,早已不是零星的网络纠纷,而是一种产业化、规模化的不正当竞争手段,并最终让依法经营的企业与普通消费者陷入“双输”的局面。

近年来,对于网络“黑水军”恶意诋毁企业等各种乱象,有关部门的整治措施正从严从重打击,无论是“净网”行动还是“清朗”行动,监管层密集出拳是为了护住企业发展的三条底线:名誉权与商誉、公平竞争权、正常经营权,避免企业将大量资源消耗在舆情攻防而非产品创新上。

目前,多家头部企业正在以几乎一致的姿态“硬刚”网络黑产——取证、起诉、不和解。比亚迪诉“龙哥讲电车”案一审判决,被告因多次发布贬损不实言论被判赔偿200万元,其关联账号同时被赛力斯、小鹏分别起诉,三案合计判赔超226万元,成为“一黑多打”的典型样本。华为则在多个社交平台展开集中取证和批量法律行动。

文章来源:亿邦动力

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0