广告
加载中

一批黑鸭煲门店消失 风口品类越来越“短命”?

红餐编辑部 2026-07-30 14:41
红餐编辑部 2026/07/30 14:41

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章梳理了网红餐饮风口品类黑鸭煲从爆火到退潮的全过程,分析了多数网红风口品类短命的核心原因,给普通读者带来相关信息和实操参考。

1. 核心重点信息:黑鸭煲2024年底从武汉兴起,2025年火爆全国,相关企业数量暴涨至上年同期的10倍,不少品牌排队3小时才能吃上,甚至有门店改造9天就回本;仅一年多时间,到2026年7月,多个头部品牌就大规模闭店,头部品牌回味黑鸭煲上海、北京门店全关,多数品牌经营未满一年就退场。

2. 想开小餐饮的普通读者实操提醒:不要盲目跟风进场做网红风口品类,这类品类大多靠猎奇吸引客流,产品壁垒低极易复制,新鲜感消退后就会没复购,要优先关注产品本身的竞争力,再考虑入场。

本文分析了餐饮行业网红风口品类速生速死的现状与原因,给餐饮品牌商提供了品牌建设、产品研发、消费趋势等多方面的参考。

1. 当前消费趋势:消费者对新奇品类的尝鲜意愿很高,但新鲜感消退速度也很快,客流留存和复购最终还是依靠产品品质,单纯的猎奇营销无法留住消费者。

2. 品牌营销警示:依靠社交平台猎奇营销、造排队声势的方式只能短期引爆声量,无法建立长期的用户信任和品牌口碑,快速放加盟冲规模的流量生意很难长久。

3. 产品研发提醒:低壁垒的标准化产品很容易被全行业复制,品牌需要打造自身的产品技术、品质护城河,还要坚守诚信,不能虚假宣传、以次充好消耗品牌口碑。

本文梳理了餐饮网红风口品类的发展规律与风险,给餐饮卖家提供了机会判断、风险提示等多方面的干货参考。

1. 当前网红餐饮品类的发展规律:现在风口品类的生命周期不断压缩,已经从年抛型加速变为季抛型,所有网红品类基本遵循同一套扩张剧本:核心商圈开首店造排队效应、达人探店短视频营销造声势、热度最高点开放加盟冲规模,本质是短期流量生意,不是长期餐饮生意。

2. 风险提示:盲目跟风开专门店风险极高,低壁垒品类很快就会同质化,新鲜感退去后没有复购,专用设备通用性差,倒闭后只能按废品计价,很难回本。

3. 机会提示:卖家可以借风口热度,在原有菜单中加入相关单品,不用专门转型就能分到风口流量红利,大幅降低试错成本,已有多个不同赛道的餐饮品牌验证过这个方法可行。

本文分析了餐饮网红风口品类的发展特征与需求,给餐饮生产相关工厂提供了产品生产、商业机会、风险控制等方面的启示。

1. 产品生产需求:当前网红餐饮品类普遍偏好高度标准化、能快速出餐的预制产品,“一酱成菜”的模式广受品牌欢迎,对预预处理的锁鲜食材需求量大,工厂可针对性开发相关标准化产品,抓住风口期的需求增量。

2. 商业风险提示:网红风口品类迭代速度快、生命周期短,工厂开发相关产品要控制产能,避免品类退潮后出现产能闲置的问题,同时尽量开发通用性强的产品,不要只做单一品类专用的产品,降低市场波动带来的风险。

3. 长期发展启示:工厂可以帮助合作品牌打造差异化的产品品质,帮助品牌建立产品壁垒,绑定长期稳定的合作关系,不要只跟风做低门槛的通用产品打价格战。

本文梳理了当前餐饮网红风口品类的发展痛点与行业趋势,给餐饮相关服务商带来了业务发展方面的干货参考。

1. 行业发展趋势:当前餐饮赛道风口迭代速度持续加快,网红品类的生命周期不断压缩,大量新入场的网红品牌既有短期快速爆量的营销需求,也有热度退潮后的转型调整需求,相关服务市场的空间较大。

2. 客户核心痛点:多数网红风口品牌擅长做流量营销,不擅长搭建长期运营体系,也缺乏产品壁垒打造、复购运营、风险控制的能力,很容易在热度退去后直接倒闭,存在大量未被满足的服务需求。

3. 解决方案方向:服务商可以针对这类客户推出分层服务,短期提供合规的流量营销服务,长期帮助品牌搭建产品品质管控体系和用户复购运营体系,还可以推出通用性强的配套供应链服务,帮助客户降低转型试错成本。

本文分析了网红餐饮风口品类的发展规律与风险,给商业地产平台、餐饮招商平台等平台商提供了招商运营、风险规避方面的参考。

1. 品牌需求特征:网红风口品牌为了打造排队效应,对核心商圈的黄金点位需求很高,愿意支付更高的租金,也能短期为平台带来大量流量,但品牌的稳定性很差,闭店收缩的速度很快。

2. 运营管理提示:平台可以引入网红品牌短期拉动流量,但不能过度依赖网红风口品类,需要优化租户的品牌结构,搭配足够多的成熟稳定品牌,降低网红品牌集体闭店带来的空置风险。

3. 风险规避提示:和网红品牌合作前,要提前评估品牌的产品力和抗风险能力,不要为了短期流量引入不靠谱的品牌,避免品牌快速闭店增加二次招租的成本,还要警惕品牌快速放加盟带来的品控问题,避免影响平台的口碑。

本文呈现了当前国内餐饮产业网红风口品类发展的新动向,总结了这类品类的共性发展模式,给餐饮产业研究者提供了丰富的案例和研究方向。

1. 产业新动向:当前国内餐饮赛道的网红新品类生命周期正在不断压缩,已经从早年的年抛型加速滑向季抛型,风口迭代速度越来越快,速生速死成为网红新品类的普遍特征,大量玩家跟风入局又快速退场。

2. 产业新问题:当前餐饮行业越来越倾向于做短期流量生意,很多新品类只追求扩张速度,忽略产品力打磨和长期用户口碑沉淀,行业普遍存在低壁垒、同质化问题,部分品牌还存在虚假宣传、以次充好的乱象,影响行业整体信任。

3. 商业模式研究:本文总结了当前网红风口品类通用的扩张变现模式,也就是造排队、炒声量、放加盟的三步剧本,本质是流量变现的短期生意,这种模式的形成原因、可持续性以及对餐饮行业长期发展的影响,都值得深入研究。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines the full trajectory of the black duck clay pot, a viral food category that went from breakout popularity to rapid decline, analyzes the core reasons why most trend-driven food categories have short lifespans, and provides relevant information and practical guidance for general readers.

1. Key facts: The black duck clay pot trend emerged in Wuhan at the end of 2024, and went nationwide in 2025. The number of related businesses surged to 10 times the year-earlier level, with many popular brands seeing three-hour wait times for tables, and some outlets even recouping their full investment in just nine days of operation. Just over a year later, by July 2026, multiple leading brands initiated large-scale store closures: top player Huiwei Black Duck Pot shut down all its locations in Shanghai and Beijing, and most brands exited the market less than a year after launching.

2. Practical takeaways for aspiring small restaurant operators: Do not jump blindly into trend-driven viral food categories. Most of these categories draw customers only through novelty, have extremely low product barriers that make them easy to replicate, and see demand collapse once the initial novelty fades. Prioritize evaluating the inherent competitiveness of your product before entering any new segment.

This article analyzes the current status and root causes of the "live fast, die young" pattern of trend-driven viral food categories in China's catering industry, and provides insights for food brand operators across brand building, product development and consumer trend strategy.

1. Current consumer trends: Consumers are highly willing to try new, novel food categories, but their novelty fades extremely quickly. Customer retention and repeat business ultimately depend on product quality; novelty-focused marketing alone cannot sustain a customer base.

2. Brand marketing warning: Relying on novelty-driven social media marketing and manufactured crowd waiting can only generate short-term buzz. It cannot build long-term customer trust or brand reputation, and a volume-focused business model built on rapid franchise expansion is rarely sustainable.

3. Product development guidance: Low-barrier standardized products can be replicated industry-wide very quickly. Brands need to build moats around product technology and quality, and uphold business integrity. False advertising and cutting corners with inferior ingredients will quickly erode brand equity.

This article summarizes the development patterns and risks of trend-driven viral food categories, and provides actionable insights for food sellers on opportunity assessment and risk management.

1. Development patterns of current viral food categories: The lifespans of trending categories are continuously shrinking, accelerating from annual to quarterly turnover. Almost all viral categories follow the same expansion playbook: open an initial outlet in a core shopping district to manufacture a waiting crowd effect, generate buzz through influencer探店 short video marketing, then open up franchising at the peak of popularity to scale up quickly. This is inherently a short-term traffic play, not a sustainable long-term food business.

2. Risk warning: Opening a dedicated store to blindly follow a trend carries extremely high risk. Low-barrier categories quickly become commoditized, and demand dries up once novelty fades. Dedicated equipment for these categories usually has little general use, and can only be sold for scrap value if the business fails, making it very difficult to recoup initial investment.

3. Opportunity guidance: Sellers can capitalize on trend hype by adding related items to their existing menus, rather than pivoting entirely to the new category. This lets them capture trend-driven traffic while drastically reducing trial and error costs, a strategy that has already been validated by multiple food brands across different segments.

This article analyzes the development characteristics and market demand of trend-driven viral food categories, and provides insights for catering-related production factories across product development, business opportunity strategy and risk management.

1. Product development demand: Current viral food categories overwhelmingly favor highly standardized, prefabricated products that enable fast service. The "one sauce creates the dish" model is widely popular among brands, driving strong demand for pre-processed, fresh-locked ingredients. Factories can develop targeted standardized products to capture incremental demand during trend cycles.

2. Business risk warning: Viral food categories have very fast iteration speeds and short lifecycles. Factories should control production capacity when developing related products to avoid idle capacity after the trend fades. They should also prioritize developing versatile products that work across multiple categories, rather than single-purpose products for only one trend, to reduce exposure to market volatility.

3. Long-term development guidance: Factories can help their brand partners build differentiated product quality and product barriers, to lock in long-term stable cooperative relationships. They should avoid solely chasing low-barrier commodity products that only lead to destructive price competition.

This article outlines the core pain points and industry trends of current trend-driven viral food categories, and provides actionable insights for catering-related service providers on business growth.

1. Industry trends: The pace of trend iteration in China's catering sector continues to accelerate, and the lifespans of viral categories are shrinking. A large number of newly launched viral brands have both short-term demand for rapid volume marketing and demand for transformation and adjustment after hype fades, creating significant untapped opportunity in the service market.

2. Core customer pain points: Most trend-driven brands are good at traffic marketing, but lack capabilities to build long-term operation systems, develop product barriers, run repeat customer programs, and manage risk. Most collapse directly once hype fades, leaving large unmet demand for professional services.

3. Solution direction: Service providers can develop tiered service offerings for this customer group: provide compliant short-term traffic marketing services, and support long-term growth by helping brands build product quality management systems and repeat customer operation frameworks. They can also develop versatile supporting supply chain services to help clients reduce trial and error costs during transformation.

This article analyzes the development patterns and risks of trend-driven viral food categories, and provides insights for commercial real estate platforms and catering investment platforms on leasing operations and risk mitigation.

1. Brand demand characteristics: To build their manufactured waiting crowd effect, viral trend brands have high demand for prime locations in core business districts, are willing to pay premium rents, and can drive large short-term traffic for platforms. However, these brands have very low operational stability and close stores extremely quickly when demand declines.

2. Operation management guidance: Platforms can bring in viral brands to boost short-term foot traffic, but should not over-rely on trend-driven categories. They need to optimize their tenant mix by pairing viral brands with a sufficient share of mature, stable brands to reduce the risk of widespread vacancy if multiple viral brands exit simultaneously.

3. Risk mitigation guidance: Before partnering with viral brands, platforms should pre-evaluate the brand's product strength and risk resilience. They should avoid onboarding unqualified brands just for short-term traffic, to prevent the increased re-leasing costs that come with rapid store closures. They should also pay close attention to quality control risks from brands' rapid franchise expansion, to avoid damage to the platform's own reputation.

This article presents new trends in the development of viral trend-driven food categories in China's current catering industry, summarizes the common development model of these categories, and provides rich case studies and research directions for catering industry researchers.

1. New industry trends: The lifecycles of new viral food categories in China's catering sector are continuously compressing, accelerating from annual turnover to quarterly turnover. The pace of trend iteration is growing faster and faster, and rapid rise and rapid decline has become the norm for new viral categories, with a large number of players entering the space quickly and exiting just as fast.

2. New industry problems: The catering industry is increasingly shifting toward short-term traffic-focused business models. Many new categories prioritize expansion speed over product refinement and long-term user reputation building. The industry as a whole faces widespread low barriers and homogenization, and some brands engage in false advertising and selling inferior goods, eroding overall industry trust.

3. Business model research: This article summarizes the universal three-step expansion and monetization playbook for viral trend categories: manufacturing waiting lines, building hype, and selling franchises. This is inherently a short-term traffic monetization model. The root causes of this model, its long-term sustainability, and its impact on the long-term development of the catering industry all deserve further in-depth research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

火不过1年,风口品类难逃“速生速死”魔咒?

本文由红餐网(ID:hongcan18)原创首发作者:周沫;编辑:倩君。

从一煲难求到多品牌门店收缩、撤出,黑鸭煲突然不香了?

去年,有人为了吃一顿“黑鸭煲”,排队等位超过3小时;在河南,还有火锅店改造成黑鸭煲店后,9天便赚回了改造……

2025年,黑鸭煲曾火爆出圈,彼时大量新玩家涌入赛道,门店快速铺开,社交平台话题不断,一度被视为餐饮新风口。

然而,热潮来得快,似乎退得更快。

红餐网留意到,黑鸭煲赛道中的头部“回味黑鸭煲”,如今上海门店已全线关停。重庆、天津、广州、深圳等城市也出现了不同程度的闭店情况。不止回味黑鸭煲,鸭仙客黑鸭煲、翘兰汁·酱烧黑鸭煲等品牌,短暂亮相后也开始收缩门店,或已悄悄退场。

有的关店,有的悄悄退场……

武汉网红黑鸭煲退潮

“上海的回味黑鸭煲,已经成了时代的眼泪?”近日,有网友在社交平台发帖感慨:“去年排队都吃不上,现在居然一家不剩,全关了。”还有网友留言:“北京也一样,悄无声息就没了。”

红餐网核实发现,截至2026年7月,回味黑鸭煲全国门店仍约有200家,但其曾在上海开出的4家门店,目前确实均显示“歇业关闭”;北京的两家门店同样处于停业状态。在广州、深圳、天津等城市,该品牌也出现了不同程度的收缩。

例如,回味黑鸭煲此前在天津共开出三家门店,目前天河城店、鼓楼巷店均已“歇业关闭”,仅剩下翠亨广场唯一门店。据了解,天河城店于2025年11月开业,2026年6月30日闭店,实际经营仅7个半月,未满一年租约。

黑鸭煲的热度始于2024年底,彼时风潮从武汉迅速蔓延至全国。上海、深圳、苏州等地涌现出一批打着“武汉黑鸭煲”旗号的新品牌。企查查数据显示,2025年黑鸭煲相关企业数量激增,截至当年11月,存量已接近2024年同期的10倍。延伸阅读:《一酱成菜、人均60元,从武汉跑出的黑鸭煲能火起来吗?》

嗅到品类热度后,包括蔡林记?湖北小馆、石灰石烧鸡公、周麻婆、羊冰冰铜锅涮肉、松哥油焖大虾等不同类型的餐饮品牌,也纷纷在菜单中加入黑鸭煲单品,试图借势分一杯羹。

然而一年过去,品类热度下降。以黑鸭煲为主打的专门店,在热度退潮后普遍面临经营压力,部分品牌已出现收缩。

曾以上海为主要扩张阵地的“鸭仙客黑鸭煲”(曾开3家店)和“翘兰汁·酱烧黑鸭煲”(曾布局5家店),目前在大众点评上均已显示“歇业关闭”,后者仅在嘉兴保留一家门店。而更多的品牌则停留在单店或小范围试水阶段,始终未能形成规模。

为何以黑鸭煲为主打的专门店,普遍面临经营挑战?核心问题在于:品类热度高,但产品壁垒低。

首先,大部分黑鸭煲的操作模式是:鸭肉在中央工厂或门店预处理、卤制入味后急冻锁鲜;顾客下单后,后厨只需加热并按辣度微调,5–10分钟即可出餐。

这种“一酱成菜”的高度标准化模式,几乎任何中餐门店都能复制,缺乏技术护城河。当最初的“猎奇感”消退,消费者很快意识到:“这不就是周黑鸭的甜辣味炖锅?”新鲜感一旦褪去,复购便难以为继。

此外,部分品牌在宣传中明确标注“新鲜鸭肉、当日宰杀”,实际却使用冷冻预制鸭肉以次充好,导致出品口感大幅缩水。一位曾是某黑鸭煲忠实顾客的消费者在社交平台留言:“刚开业时来吃过好几次,味道确实不错。但最近再去,发现鸭肉和初期完全不一样了——不新鲜、肉质又干又柴。难道是生意好了就飘了?”

与此同时,早期黑鸭煲的爆火,多依赖“辣王挑战赛”等猎奇营销在社交平台制造话题。这种方式虽能短期引爆声量,却很难建立长期信任。一旦新鲜感耗尽,缺乏复购支撑的品牌便面临挑战。

风口品类拼速度:

晚半年进场,连排队的资格都没有

不只是黑鸭煲,许多曾风靡一时的餐饮品类都难逃“高开低走”的命运。生命周期被不断压缩,从“年抛型”加速滑向“季抛型”。

以近年爆火的啫啫煲为例。凭借砂锅猛火现烹、上桌时“滋滋”作响的强感官体验,这一品类迅速成为购物中心的热门选择。在社交媒体助推下,抖音相关话题播放量累计突破26亿次,一度被视为中式正餐的新风口。

但进入2026年,多家啫啫煲品牌开启战略收缩,尤其在一线城市的黄金商圈,闭店现象集中出现,整体规模缩水。

顺德干蒸菜的起落轨迹,同样是这一规律的典型。2025年初,全国各地突然涌现出大量以“顺德干蒸”或“宁波干蒸”为名的餐厅,主打“不加一滴水”“锁住食材本味”“拒绝预制菜”等概念,凭借健康、原生态的标签迅速吸引关注,并掀起一波开店热潮。

然而,这股热度并未持续太久。短短半年内,不少门店便悄然停业。社交平台上,有网友晒出照片:年初还门庭若市的干蒸菜馆,如今玻璃门上赫然贴着“旺铺转租”的告示。

这类门店专用的干蒸设备在二手市场也鲜少人问津——用途单一、通用性差,回收商普遍按废铁计价,导致入局者连回本都很难。

事实上,类似的故事近年来在餐饮圈反复上演。从生烫米线到牛肋条自助,再到大锅卤菜……一个个看似新颖的品类轮番登场,又在短时间内归于沉寂。

纵观这些“网红品类”,它们的走红路径惊人地相似,仿佛拿到了同一套“扩张剧本”:

第一步:打爆店。在核心商圈开店,制造“排队王”效应,吸引第一批“尝鲜客”。

第二步:造声势。借助达人探店、短视频等营销手段,形成“不吃就落伍”的消费焦虑。

第三步:放加盟。在热度最高点时快速开放加盟,用门店数量抢占市场心智,摊薄成本。

然而,这套剧本本质上是在做一场“流量生意”。它热得快,降温得也快。当“新鲜感”这个驱动力消失,产品力和体验感又无法支撑复购时,品类的“退潮”就成为必然。

对于一门长久的餐饮生意而言,核心是翻台率、毛利率、坪效、复购率。它需要时间打磨供应链、优化成本结构、沉淀用户口碑。

而风口品类,更像是一场追求速度的生意。速度可以在风口期抢到更多的流量,却无法在风停之后,将客人留下来。如果只有速度、没有产品力,那么曾经排队的人,也将会是“退潮”时跑得最快的人。

如万店盈利创始人陈志强所言:“风口品类里,速度本身是策略。晚半年进场,连排队的资格都没有。”

注:文/红餐编辑部,文章来源:红餐网(公众号ID:hongcan18),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:红餐网

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

黑鸭煲品类为什么快速从火爆走向大规模闭店?

黑鸭煲产品壁垒极低,一酱成菜的高度标准化模式极易复制,缺乏技术护城河,消费者新鲜感消退后复购难以为继;部分品牌以冷冻预制鸭肉冒充鲜鸭导致口碑下滑,依赖猎奇营销难以建立长期用户信任。

网红餐饮风口品类的通用走红路径是什么?

网红餐饮风口品类走红通常遵循三步:首先在核心商圈开店制造“排队王”效应吸引首批尝鲜客;其次借助达人探店、短视频等营销手段制造消费焦虑;最后在热度最高点开放加盟,快速扩张抢占市场心智。

餐饮风口品类容易速生速死的核心原因是什么?

这类风口品类本质是流量生意,仅靠新鲜感驱动用户消费,产品力和体验感不足以支撑长期复购;大多只追求扩张速度,缺乏时间打磨供应链、优化成本结构、沉淀用户口碑,风停后很难留住消费者。

长久经营的餐饮生意需要关注哪些核心指标?

长久的餐饮生意核心要关注翻台率、毛利率、坪效、复购率四大指标,不能仅依赖短期流量红利,需要投入时间打磨供应链体系、优化成本结构、沉淀用户口碑。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0