广告
加载中

主动“砍”掉电商 盐津铺子搞了一个反常识实验

蒙嘉怡 2026-07-22 11:37
蒙嘉怡 2026/07/22 11:37

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心是休闲零食企业盐津铺子,在流量越来越贵的行业背景下,做了一场主动收缩电商低价值业务的反常识实验,最终实现“卖得更少,赚得更多”,核心干货信息如下:

1. 核心操作:2025年5月618大促前夕,盐津铺子砍掉电商渠道三类低价值业务,分别是贴牌产品、非重点产品、低毛利产品,对应解决贴牌稀释品牌、非重点分散资源、低毛利侵蚀利润三个行业常见问题。

2. 实验结果:调整后虽然整体营收增速降至上市以来最低的8.64%,线上收入下滑20.5%,但净利润同比增长15.96%,扣非净利润增长25.86%,2026年一季度净利率提升至16.97%,整体盈利质量明显提升。

3. 底层逻辑:这次调整不是放弃电商,而是重新定义电商价值,把原本消耗在低价值流量上的费用,转移到品牌建设和核心品类,同时让线上让渡的规模由线下渠道承接。

盐津铺子这次主动收缩的调整,给休闲零食品牌的运营和增长提供了新的参考方向,核心干货如下:

1. 产品与品牌层面:贴牌产品虽然能快速扩充规模,但会稀释品牌价值,还会带来质量管控风险,此前盐津铺子海带片山梨酸钾超标事件就暴露了该问题;聚焦自有核心大单品能获得更高收益,2024年盐津铺子大魔王魔芋营收8.38亿元,同比增长76.09%,毛利率达31.60%,收益远优于多数代工产品。

2. 渠道与价格层面:当前线上流量成本高企,超六成商家要么亏损要么利润不足5%,过度追求线上规模会侵蚀利润;收缩低毛利线上产品可以减少对线下价格体系的冲击,稳定经销商利润预期,带动线下增长,2025年盐津铺子线下收入同比增长16.79%,零食量贩渠道增长超30%。

3. 营销投入层面:收缩低价值业务后,可将节省的流量费用转移到核心品牌建设,进一步强化核心单品的用户认知。

本文给休闲零食类线上线下卖家,分享了盐津铺子主动调整业务结构的经验,提示了当前行业的风险与机会,核心干货如下:

1. 风险提示:当前线上流量成本越来越高,派代《2025年电商生存调查》显示,超三成商家处于亏损状态,另有超三成商家利润仅0%-5%,盲目扩充SKU、冲规模会导致利润被流量和运营费用侵蚀,贴牌产品还会带来质量风险,最终损害卖家自身信誉。

2. 机会方向:当前线下渠道尤其是零食量贩渠道增长强劲,同时海外市场也存在爆发性增长机会,2025年盐津铺子线下收入增长16.79%,量贩渠道增长超30%,海外收入同比增长172.47%,增长表现远优于线上低价值业务。

3. 可借鉴经验:卖家可以主动砍掉低价值非核心业务,把资源集中到自有核心产品,优化产品结构提升盈利质量,将节省的流量费用投入到品牌建设和线下渠道拓展,通过全渠道协同实现稳定盈利。

盐津铺子的业务调整,给休闲零食生产工厂带来了多方面的启示和新的商业机会,核心干货如下:

1. 产品生产需求变化:当前品牌方越来越重视核心品类的自主生产,自有产能能让品牌掌握产品结构调整的主动权,不需要受制于上游供应商,也更容易管控产品质量、打造高毛利大单品,拥有核心品类自主生产能力的工厂,会获得更多品牌方的合作重视,也能享受更高的利润空间。

2. 新商业机会:品牌方收缩低毛利贴牌业务后,会聚焦核心品类的自主生产,非核心品类的代工需求会逐步释放,同时线下量贩渠道快速扩张,需要稳定的产能供应,给工厂带来了新的订单增长机会。

3. 数字化与电商转型启示:工厂可以绑定核心品牌的线下渠道体系,利用量贩渠道的海量即时动销数据测试新品,大幅降低产品创新的试错成本,同时可以尝试打造自有核心产品,摆脱同质化代工的低利润陷阱。

盐津铺子的调整反映了当前休闲零食电商行业的新发展趋势,也暴露了品牌方的核心痛点,给各类零食行业服务商提供了参考方向,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展新趋势:休闲零食行业已经从过去追求规模增长的阶段,转向追求盈利质量增长的新阶段,越来越多品牌会主动调整业务结构,放弃低价值的线上规模,聚焦核心盈利业务,全渠道协同发展成为行业主流方向,不再单一依赖线上流量拉动增长。

2. 品牌方核心痛点:当前线上流量成本过高,多数商家利润微薄甚至亏损,贴牌代工的质量管控难度大,多SKU运营会分散企业资源,线上低价产品还会冲击线下价格体系,这些都是当前品牌方普遍面临的核心痛点。

3. 服务商的发展方向:服务商可以针对品牌方的新需求,推出聚焦核心品类的精细化运营服务,帮助品牌方对接线下量贩渠道资源,提供线下渠道拓展和终端维护服务,也可以围绕核心单品打造品牌营销服务,替代过去低效的流量投放服务,匹配品牌方的盈利需求。

盐津铺子的这次调整,反映了品牌商家对电商平台的新需求,也给电商平台的招商、运营管理带来了启示,核心干货如下:

1. 商家面临的核心平台问题:当前平台流量成本过高,已经成为侵蚀商家利润的核心因素,派代数据显示超过六成商家利润不足5%甚至亏损,过高的流量成本迫使商家不愿意继续盲目冲规模,转而选择收缩低毛利业务来保障盈利。

2. 对平台运营管理的启示:平台需要调整流量定价机制,降低商家的获客成本,才能留住品牌商家;同时要适应商家从追规模到追盈利的转变,推出针对核心品类的精细化运营工具,帮助商家提升盈利质量,而不是一味要求商家扩充SKU冲GMV。

3. 对平台招商和风向规避的启示:平台可以重点引入拥有自有核心产能、打造出大单品的品牌商家,这类商家盈利稳定性更强,不会因为流量成本波动轻易退出;同时可以围绕品牌全渠道协同的需求,推出支持品牌“线上做势能、线下做规模”的相关服务,强化平台对品牌的不可替代性。

本文记录了休闲零食行业的一次创新性企业实验,呈现了行业增长逻辑转变的新动向,为产业研究提供了典型样本,核心研究干货如下:

1. 产业新动向:休闲零食行业的增长逻辑已经发生根本性转变,从过去全行业追求规模扩张,转向关注盈利质量增长,盐津铺子“线上做减法、线下做加法”的操作,打破了行业一直以来“扩规模才能增长”的惯性,证明主动放弃低价值增长也能获得更好的利润表现。

2. 行业新问题:当前线上流量红利见顶,流量成本高企,贴牌代工模式的供应链风险不断凸显,线上价格体系冲击线下渠道利润,这些都是行业当前面临的新问题,传统规模扩张模式已经难以为继,行业亟需探索新的增长路径。

3. 新商业模式研究样本:盐津打造的“自有核心产能+线下量贩渠道”闭环商业模式,既可以通过自有产能掌控全链路调整主动权,又可以利用量贩渠道的动销数据降低新品试错成本、消化产能,为行业提供了新的可研究商业模式,同时也留下核心品类增长持续性、电商新角色成效等待验证研究的问题。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article focuses on Yanjin Puzi, a Chinese snack food company, which ran a counterintuitive experiment: amid a broader industry trend of rising online traffic acquisition costs, it proactively cut low-value e-commerce operations, and ultimately achieved "selling less, earning more". Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core move: On the eve of the 2025 June 18 mid-year shopping festival, Yanjin Puzi cut three categories of low-value e-commerce business — OEM products, non-priority SKUs, and low-margin items. This addressed three common industry pain points: brand dilution from OEM manufacturing, resource dispersion from overextending product lines, and profit erosion from low-margin products.

2. Experiment results: After the adjustment, the company's overall revenue growth slowed to 8.64% year-on-year, the lowest rate since its IPO, with online revenue dropping 20.5%. However, net profit rose 15.96% year-on-year, while adjusted net profit excluding one-off items grew 25.86%. Net margin climbed to 16.97% in Q1 2026, marking a clear improvement in overall profitability quality.

3. Underlying logic: This adjustment is not a retreat from e-commerce, but a redefinition of the channel's value. The company reallocated spending previously wasted on low-value traffic to brand building and core product categories, while the scale ceded from online operations was absorbed by offline channels.

Yanjin Puzi's proactive contraction provides a new reference for operation and growth strategies for snack food brands. Key insights are as follows:

1. Product and brand: While OEM products can quickly scale revenue, they dilute brand equity and bring quality control risks — an issue exposed by Yanjin Puzi's previous kelp product potassium sorbate over-standard incident. Focusing on self-owned core flagship products delivers far higher returns: in 2024, Yanjin Puzi's "Big Devil" konjac product generated 838 million yuan in revenue, up 76.09% year-on-year, with a 31.60% gross margin, outperforming most OEM products by a wide margin.

2. Channel and pricing: Online traffic costs have surged to record highs, with over 60% of snack brands either losing money or earning less than 5% net margin. Overpursuing online scale directly erodes profits. Cutting low-margin online products also reduces pressure on offline pricing systems, stabilizes dealer profit expectations and drives offline growth: Yanjin Puzi's offline revenue grew 16.79% year-on-year in 2025, with revenue from bulk snack store channels growing over 30%.

3. Marketing investment: After cutting low-value operations, savings from reduced traffic spending can be reallocated to core brand building, further strengthening consumer awareness of flagship products.

This article shares lessons from Yanjin Puzi's proactive business restructuring for online and offline snack sellers, outlining current industry risks and opportunities. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Risk warning: Online traffic costs are rising steadily. Paiday's 2025 E-commerce Survival Survey shows that over 30% of online sellers are unprofitable, and another 30% only earn 0-5% net margin. Blindly expanding SKUs to chase scale will erode profits via higher traffic and operating costs, while OEM products carry quality risks that ultimately damage a seller's own reputation.

2. Opportunity outlook: Offline channels, especially bulk snack stores, are seeing strong growth, while overseas markets also offer explosive growth opportunities. In 2025, Yanjin Puzi's offline revenue grew 16.79% year-on-year, bulk snack channel revenue grew over 30%, and overseas revenue jumped 172.47% year-on-year — all outperforming low-value online business by a large margin.

3. Actionable lessons: Sellers can proactively cut low-value non-core business to concentrate resources on self-owned core products, optimize product structure to improve profitability, and reallocate savings from reduced traffic spending to brand building and offline channel expansion, achieving stable profitability through omni-channel synergy.

Yanjin Puzi's business restructuring offers multiple insights and new business opportunities for snack food manufacturing factories. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Shifts in production demand: Brand owners are increasingly prioritizing in-house production for core categories. Owning proprietary production capacity gives brands full control over product portfolio adjustments, eliminates reliance on upstream suppliers, simplifies quality control, and makes it easier to build high-margin flagship products. Factories with in-house production capacity for core categories will gain more attention from brand partners and enjoy higher profit margins.

2. New business opportunities: As brands cut low-margin OEM business and refocus on in-house production for core categories, OEM demand for non-core categories will gradually be released to third-party factories. At the same time, the rapid expansion of offline bulk snack channels requires stable production capacity, bringing new order growth opportunities for manufacturers.

3. Insights for digital and e-commerce transformation: Factories can partner with core brands to access their offline channel networks, and test new products using the massive real-time sales data from bulk snack channels to drastically reduce trial-and-error costs for product innovation. They can also develop their own core products to escape the low-profit trap of homogeneous contract manufacturing.

Yanjin Puzi's adjustment reflects new development trends in the current snack e-commerce industry and exposes core pain points of brand owners, providing reference directions for all types of snack industry service providers. Key insights are as follows:

1. New industry development trends: The snack food industry has shifted from the past stage of pursuing scale growth to a new stage of focusing on profit quality growth. More and more brands will proactively adjust their business structure, give up low-value online scale, and focus on core profitable businesses. Omnichannel collaborative development has become the mainstream direction of the industry, replacing the old model of single dependence on online traffic to drive growth.

2. Core pain points of brand owners: Currently, online traffic costs are excessively high, leaving most merchants with meager profits or even losses. Quality control for OEM products is highly challenging, multi-SKU operation disperses corporate resources, and low-priced online products disrupt offline pricing systems. All these are core pain points generally faced by brand owners today.

3. Development directions for service providers: Service providers can launch refined operation services focused on core categories to match the new needs of brand owners, help brands connect with offline bulk snack channel resources, provide offline channel expansion and terminal maintenance services, and also build brand marketing services centered on core single products to replace the previous inefficient traffic delivery services, aligning with the profitability needs of brand owners.

Yanjin Puzi's adjustment reflects brand owners' new demands for e-commerce platforms, and offers insights for platform merchant recruitment and operation management. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core platform-related pain points for merchants: Excessively high platform traffic costs have become the top factor eroding merchant profits. Paiday data shows more than 60% of merchants earn less than 5% profit or operate at a loss. High traffic costs are forcing merchants to stop blindly chasing scale and instead cut low-margin business to protect profitability.

2. Insights for platform operation management: Platforms need to adjust traffic pricing mechanisms to reduce merchants' customer acquisition costs in order to retain brand merchants. They also need to adapt to merchants' shift from chasing scale to chasing profitability, launch refined operation tools tailored for core categories to help brands improve profitability, rather than endlessly pushing merchants to expand SKUs to hit GMV targets.

3. Insights for merchant recruitment and risk mitigation: Platforms can prioritize recruiting brands with proprietary core production capacity and established flagship products, as these merchants have more stable profitability and are far less likely to exit the market amid traffic cost fluctuations. Platforms can also launch services aligned with brands' omni-channel synergy needs, supporting brands' strategy of "building brand momentum online, scaling revenue offline" to strengthen platforms' irreplaceability for brand partners.

This article records an innovative corporate experiment in the snack food industry, presents new trends in the shift of industry growth logic, and provides a typical sample for industrial research. Core research takeaways are as follows:

1. New industrial trends: The growth logic of the snack food industry has undergone a fundamental change, shifting from the whole industry pursuing scale expansion to focusing on profit quality growth. Yanjin Puzi's operation of "making cuts online and adding offline" breaks the long-standing industry inertia that "expansion is required for growth", and proves that actively giving up low-value growth can also achieve better profit performance.

2. New industry problems: Current online traffic dividends have peaked, traffic costs are high, supply chain risks of the OEM model are increasingly prominent, and online price systems erode offline channel profits. These are all new problems facing the industry today. The traditional scale expansion model is no longer sustainable, and the industry urgently needs to explore new growth paths.

3. A new business model research sample: The closed-loop business model of "proprietary core production capacity + offline bulk snack channel" built by Yanjin Puzi not only enables the company to control the initiative of full-link adjustment through proprietary production capacity, but also uses the sales data of bulk channels to reduce new product trial and error costs and absorb production capacity, providing a new researchable business model for the industry. At the same time, it also leaves questions to be verified and studied, such as the sustainability of core category growth and the effectiveness of e-commerce's new role.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

导读:当流量越来越贵,盐津铺子开始放弃低价值的部分。

蒙嘉怡丨作者

杨宇丨编辑

壹览商业丨出品

2025年初夏,盐津铺子电商事业部迎来了一次不同寻常的调整。

5月,距离618大促不足一个月,盐津铺子电商团队收到通知,从当月开始缩减贴牌产品、非重点产品和低毛利产品。618是电商平台全年最重要的销售节点之一,零售企业通常会提前数月备货,通过扩充SKU、参与平台活动、投入流量资源,在短时间内放大销售规模。

在大促前夕主动收缩,并不符合行业惯性。

彼时,三只松鼠重回百亿营收,提出构建“制造、品牌、零售”一体化布局;良品铺子挥刀向内,试图通过调价寻找新的增长空间;量贩零食店更是在街头巷尾贴身肉搏,把6.9元、9.9元的价签贴满货架。大多数玩家仍在通过扩大商品池、增加渠道触点和提升销售规模寻找增长,盐津铺子却选择了逆向而行。

一位接近盐津铺子的业内人士告诉壹览商业,事实上,盐津铺子内部对于线上业务结构调整的讨论早在2024年已经开始。过去,盐津铺子的电商业务覆盖较广,随着大单品“大魔王”的成长,管理层意识到,不同产品创造的价值并不相同,2024年盐津铺子的休闲魔芋制品营收8.38亿元,同比增长76.09%,毛利率31.60%。同时,2024年的海带片山梨酸钾超标事件,进一步暴露了外部供应链的管理风险,引起内部反思。

2025年5月,调整正式启动。

一年后,财报给出了两组看似矛盾的数据:2025年,盐津铺子营收57.62亿元,同比增长8.64%,增速创上市以来新低;第四季度单季营业收入同比下降7.5%,首次出现季度负增长。但与此同时,净利润达到7.43亿元,同比增长15.96%,扣非净利润同比增长25.86%。

对于一家消费企业而言,减少销售规模通常意味着承受业绩压力,但盐津铺子却出现了“卖得更少,赚得更多”的结果。这场主动收缩背后,到底发生了什么?

1

主动收缩,盐津铺子砍掉的到底是什么?

表面上看,盐津铺子正在收缩电商业务,但实际上,其砍掉的是电商渠道中越来越难创造价值的一部分。在2026年5月13日的业绩说明会上,盐津铺子明确表示,电商业务缩减的是贴牌产品、非重点产品、低毛利产品,这三类产品对应三个不同的问题。

贴牌产品的问题在于稀释品牌。这类产品企业掌握销售端、供应商掌握生产端,产品调整、成本控制和质量管控都受制于上游,而一旦上游出问题,承担信誉损失的是盐津铺子。同时,贴牌产品差异化能力弱,容易陷入同质化竞争。

非重点产品的问题在于分散资源。在电商的搜索逻辑下,SKU越多,意味着更多触达消费者的机会。但研发、供应链、库存管理和运营资源是有限的,铺得越开,单项投入越容易被摊薄,而这些投入未必产生相匹配的回报。

低毛利产品的问题在于侵蚀利润。这些产品在线上往往依赖平台流量、促销活动和价格竞争维持销量,而线上流量已越来越贵,派代《2025年电商生存调查》显示,超过30%的商家处于亏损状态,另有超过30%的商家利润微薄到仅有0%~5%。在这样的环境下,低毛利产品带来的不仅是有限利润,也可能进一步消耗企业资源。

在壹览商业看来,盐津铺子的调整本质上不是减少电商,而是在重新定义电商的价值。这一变化也体现在盐津铺子近年来对于电商业务的表述变化中。

2021年至2022年,电商被定位为独立的高速增长引擎,关键词是“销售翻番”,核心打法是追逐抖音、拼多多的红利机会。

2023年至2024年,态度开始转变,提出要“发挥多品类品牌优势”,电商不再只是出货渠道。

到了2025年,表述发生质变——“电商聚焦核心品类经营,持续改善盈利质量”,明确赋予电商“以线上势能牵引线下渠道渗透,促进全渠道协同发展”的战略任务。从追规模到要质量,电商在公司内部的角色完成了切换。

当然,壮士断腕是需要付出代价的。砍掉上述产品后,盐津铺子线上收入从2024年的11.59亿元降至9.22亿元,下滑20.50%,占总营收的比例从21.86%降至15.99%;整体营收增速从28.89%降至8.64%;由于未满足股权激励业绩条件,公司还回购注销约252.22万股,涉及94名激励对象。

盐津铺子确实牺牲了一部分增长。问题在于,这些被牺牲的增长,原本是否值得保留?

2

什么少卖为什么还能多赚?

利润端的变化给出了答案。

2026年一季度,盐津铺子营收同比仅增长2.94%,净利润却达到2.69亿元,同比增长27.29%,净利率提升至16.97%,同比提高3.3个百分点。

收入降速、利润提速,说明盐津铺子单位销售的盈利质量正在提高,而这来自三个层面的变化。

首先,产品结构改善带来了盈利质量提升。盐津铺子减少的并不是所有线上商品,而是那些依赖外部供应链、利润贡献有限的产品。当资源重新集中到核心品类后,收入规模虽然下降,但每一笔销售背后的利润贡献开始提升。

其次,低效费用被直接释放。零食品牌的线上销售远非“上架商品”那么简单,广告投放、直播佣金、达人推广、平台营销,一部分线上GMV天然对应着高额费用,盐津铺子缩减线上业务后,最先省下的正是这部分消耗。

2025年,盐津铺子销售费用约6.05亿元,同比下降约8.7%,销售费用率降至10.50%,为近6年最低。同期,三只松鼠销售费用率为19.74%,良品铺子为23.43%。

更值得关注的是省下的钱去了哪里。2025年,盐津铺子品牌及推广费用从2.32亿元增至2.89亿元,并在当年底宣布王一博成为大魔王品牌全球代言人。也就是说,这次调整不是简单削减投入,而是把原本消耗在流量上的费用,转移到品牌建设、核心渠道和优势产品上。

最后,盐津铺子重新强化线下渠道的价值。减少低价、低毛利的线上产品后,线上价格体系对线下终端的冲击减弱,经销商能够获得更稳定的利润预期;与此同时,盐津铺子把更多经营资源投向渠道拓展、终端维护和核心产品推广。

数据印证了这种承接能力。2025年,盐津铺子线下收入48.41亿元,同比增长16.79%,占总收入的比例提升至84%;零食量贩渠道同比增长超30%;经销商达4367家,同比增长21.75%;海外业务从0.63亿元跃升至1.71亿元,同比增长172.47%。线上让渡的规模,被线下接了回来。

概括起来,盐津铺子利润增长的逻辑是线上做减法,减少低价值GMV、降低流量消耗;线下做加法,强化核心渠道、稳定价格体系。

3

为什么盐津铺子敢于做减法

值得注意的是,并不是所有企业都有能力在电商仍然贡献销售规模时主动收缩业务。

2025年,三只松鼠营收同比下降4.08%,净利润同比下滑61.90%。年报将利润变动归因于部分线上平台流量结构变化带来的费率提升等因素。良品铺子同期营收同比下降23.38%,线上收入下降26.05%,亏损进一步扩大。公司解释称,部分产品售价下调和产品结构调整影响了毛利率,平台流量下滑影响了销售。

这两家公司的下滑,是外部压力传导的结果;盐津铺子的下滑,是尚有选择时做出的决定。那么,盐津铺子凭什么敢主动做减法?

第一,自主制造能力给了盐津铺子调整产品结构的主动权。与三只松鼠、良品铺子以品牌运营见长不同,盐津铺子在核心品类上拥有自主产能,当其决定聚焦某一品类时,可以从研发、生产到销售全链路协同调整,而不需要受制于外部供应商。

第二,核心品类的增长为公司提供了调整空间。“大魔王”已经证明,一款自产核心单品的利润贡献可以超过多款代工产品的总和。魔芋、蛋类、海味零食等核心品类持续放量,使得盐津铺子即使线上整体收缩,仍有足够的增长引擎支撑利润目标。核心品类的高毛利属性,也直接推升了整体盈利水平。

第三,与部分高度依赖线上销售的零食品牌不同,盐津铺子的增长基础建立在线下分销体系。随着量贩零食、会员店、海外市场以及传统经销网络的发展,公司拥有更多渠道承接业务增长。

而盐津铺子与零食量贩龙头鸣鸣很忙集团的战略合作关系,为其提供了一个大体量、确定性强且去平台化的内部消化渠道。量贩渠道拥有海量、即时的终端动销数据,不仅能够帮助盐津铺子消化产能,还能成为新品测试的阵地,大幅降低了产品创新的试错成本。这种“自有产能+量贩渠道”的闭环,让盐津铺子在放弃一部分线上GMV时,有更确定的增长路径可以依赖。

当然,减法是否成立,最终要靠后续经营验证,目前盐津铺子至少需要回答两个问题。

一是收缩后的电商能否接住新任务。按照公司的定位,电商要“以线上势能牵引线下渠道渗透”,这个角色的成效,无法用一个季度的财报验证,接下来的大促表现、核心品类的线上动销,才是观察窗口。

二是核心品类的增长能否持续覆盖让渡的规模。大魔王证明了自产单品的爆发力,但魔芋之后,下一个大单品在哪里,决定着这场减法的后劲。

对行业而言,盐津铺子的意义在于提供了一个样本,卖得更多和赚得更多不再是同一件事,零食企业第一次可以认真讨论要不要收缩这个选项。但减法本身不是答案,减法之后能不能做回加法,才是这场调整真正要交的作业。

END

注:文/蒙嘉怡,文章来源:壹览商业(公众号ID:yilanshangye ),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:壹览商业

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

盐津铺子电商业务调整主要砍掉了哪些产品?

盐津铺子此次电商业务调整主要砍掉三类产品:一是容易稀释品牌、质量管控难度大的贴牌产品,二是会分散研发、供应链、运营资源的非重点产品,三是侵蚀利润、依赖流量价格战维持销量的低毛利产品。

盐津铺子收缩电商业务后为什么能实现利润增长?

盐津铺子利润增长来自三方面调整:一是聚焦核心品类优化产品结构,提升单位销售利润;二是缩减线上低效流量投入,2025年销售费用率降至近6年最低的10.5%;三是强化线下渠道,2025年线下收入同比增长16.79%,承接线上让渡的规模。

盐津铺子敢于主动收缩电商业务的核心支撑是什么?

盐津铺子做减法的核心支撑有三点:一是核心品类具备自主制造能力,可全链路协同调整不受制于外部供应商;二是魔芋、蛋类等高毛利核心品类持续放量,有足够利润增长引擎;三是拥有成熟的线下分销、量贩、海外等多渠道承接增长需求。

盐津铺子对电商业务的战略定位有什么变化?

盐津铺子对电商的定位历经多轮调整:2021-2022年定位为独立高速增长引擎,以追规模为核心;2023-2024年定位为多品类品牌赋能渠道;2025年起要求聚焦核心品类,以线上势能牵引线下全渠道协同,提升盈利质量。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0