广告
加载中

一根20年前的吸管 被瑞幸重新“捡”起来了

专注餐饮供应链的 2026-07-16 13:03
专注餐饮供应链的 2026/07/16 13:03

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心信息是瑞幸近期重新上线乳酸菌美式,推出可免费选择的百亿活菌吸管,这款创新产品是对20年前海外成熟方案的跨场景复用,干货信息如下

1. 这款带颗粒的吸管并非新发明,2005年海外就有类似产品推出,曾经全球销量超10亿根,但长期没能普及,先天存在明显短板:单只成本是普通吸管数倍,饮用时颗粒溶解过快,后半段没有风味或功能效果,体验不佳,这些问题瑞幸这款产品依然存在

2. 瑞幸选择该方案核心是降本增效,不需要改动原有咖啡配方和生产线,研发试错成本几乎为零,还解决了活菌在酸性咖啡中容易失活的问题,适配品牌高频上新的策略,目前不需要消费者额外付费

当前这类包材创新红利窗口期较短,容易被模仿,只能作为细节加分项,不能替代核心产品体验

本文分析了瑞幸活菌吸管的创新逻辑,对饮品品牌的产品研发、营销创新有较多参考干货,具体如下

1. 产品研发端:可以借鉴成熟小众方案跨场景复用的思路,做包材类微创新,不需要从零研发新品,能大幅压缩研发周期、降低试错成本,还可以绕开核心技术瓶颈,比如本案例中用吸管封装活菌,避开了咖啡液对活菌的破坏,完整保留产品概念,适配品牌高频上新的策略

2. 营销端:靠包装差异化能快速制造话题,拉动消费者尝鲜,投入产出比远高于传统新品研发,新增成本可控,不需要突破现有价格体系就能获得关注度

3. 风险提示:这类创新技术门槛低,护城河浅,差异化红利窗口期短,容易被快速模仿,包材创新只是锦上添花的细节升级,不能替代核心配方和产品体验的打磨,当前饮品行业已经进入卷体验、卷细节的竞争阶段

本文围绕瑞幸的包材微创新案例,给饮品卖家梳理了可参考的经验和需要注意的风险,具体如下

1. 机会层面:当下饮品口味创新难度提升,消费者很难被新口味打动,卖家可以借鉴这种轻创新模式,复用成熟的小众包材方案,用极低的成本快速推出新品,制造差异化和话题度,试错风险很低,不需要改动原有生产线和配方,供应链适配成本低,十分适合高频上新的运营策略

2. 风险提示:这类功能吸管本身存在先天短板,单只成本远高于普通吸管,还存在颗粒溶解过快、体验不佳的问题,而且技术门槛低,很容易被同行模仿,差异化的红利只能维持较短时间,消费者不会只因为包材创新成为忠实用户

3. 可学习点:这种低成本试错的模式灵活性高,卖得好可以追加订单,反馈不好可以及时止损,适合想要控制新品研发成本的各类卖家

本文透露出饮品行业对包材创新的新需求,给各类食品、包装生产工厂带来了商业机会和发展启示,具体如下

1. 需求层面:当下头部饮品品牌越来越重视细节创新,对成熟的功能性包材方案需求旺盛,类似活菌吸管这类带功能颗粒的包材,已经有成熟的生产工艺,不需要从零开模研发,就可以对接品牌的创新需求,有稳定的市场空间

2. 商业机会:现有同类产品大多定位儿童零食市场,成人饮品市场几乎空白,工厂可以针对成人饮品场景优化产品,调整颗粒大小和溶解速度,解决原有产品溶解过快、吸阻力大的问题,同时优化生产工序降低成本,适配大众饮品走量的需求

3. 发展启示:工厂可以盘活存量成熟产品,挖掘原有小众产品的新场景价值,对接主流饮品品牌的创新需求,不需要投入大量研发费用就能打开新的销路,拓展自身的客户群体

本文分析了当前饮品行业创新的新趋势和品牌方的核心痛点,给餐饮供应链服务商带来了方向参考,具体如下

1. 行业发展趋势:当前饮品行业配方同质化越来越严重,供应链透明度越来越高,行业竞争已经从卷价格、卷口味转向卷体验、卷细节,品牌对低风险、低成本的创新方案需求大幅增长,包材微创新成为新的行业趋势

2. 客户核心痛点:品牌推新品普遍面临研发周期长、投入成本高、试错风险大的问题,同时部分功能性成分比如活性益生菌,在饮品中难以存活,直接添加会削弱产品概念,这些都是待解决的核心痛点

3. 解决方案方向:服务商可以梳理整合现有成熟的小众功能包材产品,针对不同饮品场景做适配优化,给品牌提供现成的创新方案,同时优化产品体验,解决原有产品成本高、体验差的问题,帮助品牌降低创新门槛

本文反映了当前饮品创新领域的新动向,给各类餐饮供应链平台、电商平台的招商和运营带来参考,具体如下

1. 市场需求:当前饮品品牌对成熟功能性包材的需求正在快速增长,而类似带功能颗粒的吸管这类产品,目前在主流电商和供应链平台上供给很少,存在明确的市场缺口

2. 招商方向:平台可以针对性引入广东好心情这类生产功能包材、糖玩产品的企业,丰富平台的供应链品类,对接品牌的微创新需求,还可以打造专属的包材创新专区,提升供需撮合效率

3. 运营和风险规避:这类产品技术门槛低,容易出现同质化竞争,平台可以引导商家优化产品体验打造差异化,同时规范产品宣传,避免过度营销噱头引发消费者争议,还要提醒品牌包材创新只是细节补充,帮助品牌合理把控创新方向

本文以瑞幸活菌吸管创新事件为案例,呈现了当下饮品行业创新的新动向、新商业模式和新问题,对产业研究有较高的参考价值,具体如下

1. 产业新动向:当前饮品行业产品配方同质化加剧,供应链透明度不断提升,消费者对新口味的新鲜感越来越低,行业竞争已经从早期的卷价格、卷口味,升级为卷体验、卷细节,包材等细节创新成为行业新的竞争方向

2. 新商业模式:诞生了成熟小众方案跨场景复用的轻创新商业模式,这种模式将已有成熟技术挪用到新场景,大幅降低了新品研发的试错成本和时间周期,完美适配头部品牌高频上新的策略,投入产出比远高于传统的深度研发模式

3. 待研究的新问题:这种轻创新模式技术门槛低,护城河浅,差异化红利窗口期很短,如何平衡轻创新和核心产品研发,如何维持长期的差异化竞争力,都是行业新出现的问题,值得深入研究

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article covers Luckin Coffee's recent relaunch of its Lactic Acid Bacteria Americano, which introduces free "billion probiotic straws" as an option. This innovative product is actually a cross-scenario adaptation of a mature concept that originated overseas 20 years ago.

1. The particle-containing straw is not a new invention. Similar products launched overseas in 2005 once sold over 1 billion units globally, but never achieved widespread adoption due to inherent flaws: each unit costs several times more than a standard straw, particles dissolve too quickly during consumption, leaving no functional or flavor benefit in the second half of the drink, resulting in poor user experience. These same flaws remain in Luckin's version.

2. Luckin adopted this design primarily to cut costs and boost efficiency: it requires no changes to existing coffee recipes or production lines, bringing near-zero R&D and trial-and-error costs. It also solves the problem of probiotics deactivating in acidic coffee, aligning perfectly with the brand's strategy of frequent new product launches. Currently, the option is available to consumers at no extra charge.

Innovation of this kind in packaging materials has a short window of opportunity, is easily copied, and can only add incremental value rather than replace core product experience.

This article analyzes the innovation logic behind Luckin's probiotic straw, offering actionable insights for beverage brands on product development and marketing innovation.

1. For product R&D: Brands can adapt the approach of repurposing mature niche solutions across scenarios for incremental packaging innovation. This eliminates the need for full de novo product development, drastically shortens R&D cycles, cuts trial-and-error costs, and bypasses core technical bottlenecks. In this case, encapsulating probiotics in straws avoids damage from coffee liquid, preserves the full product concept, and fits perfectly with a strategy of frequent new product launches.

2. For marketing: Packaging differentiation quickly generates buzz and drives consumer trial, delivering a far higher return on investment than traditional new product development. Incremental costs are controllable, and brands can gain visibility without disrupting existing pricing structures.

3. Risk warning: This type of innovation has low technical barriers and little competitive moat, with a short window of differentiation advantage and high risk of rapid imitation. Packaging innovation is only an incremental detail upgrade, and cannot replace investment in core recipe and product experience refinement. The beverage industry has now entered an era of competition centered on incremental experience and detail improvements.

This article uses Luckin's incremental packaging innovation case to outline actionable insights and risk warnings for beverage sellers.

1. Opportunity: As beverage flavor innovation becomes increasingly difficult and consumers grow harder to impress with new flavors, sellers can adopt this light innovation model: repurpose mature niche packaging solutions to launch new products quickly at very low cost, build differentiation and buzz, and keep trial-and-error risk minimal. No changes to existing production lines or recipes are required, and supply chain adaptation costs are low, making this model ideal for a frequent new product launch strategy.

2. Risk warning: Functional straws of this type have inherent flaws: they cost far more than standard straws, particles dissolve too quickly leading to poor user experience, and low technical barriers make them easy for competitors to copy. Differentiation advantages only last a short time, and consumers will not become loyal customers based on packaging innovation alone.

3. Key takeaway: This low-cost trial-and-error model offers high flexibility: sellers can scale up orders if products perform well, and cut losses quickly if consumer feedback is poor. It is well-suited for all types of sellers looking to control new product R&D costs.

This article outlines emerging demand for packaging innovation in the beverage industry, presenting new business opportunities and insights for food and packaging manufacturers.

1. Demand: Leading beverage brands are increasingly focused on incremental detail innovation, and have growing demand for mature functional packaging solutions. Functional particle-containing packaging like the probiotic straw already has mature production processes, so manufacturers do not need to develop new molds or products from scratch to meet brands' innovation needs, creating stable market opportunities.

2. Business opportunity: Most existing similar products are targeted at the children's snack market, leaving the adult beverage market nearly untapped. Manufacturers can optimize products for adult beverage scenarios by adjusting particle size and dissolution rate to solve existing problems of overly fast dissolution and high suction resistance, while streamlining production processes to lower costs and meet the high-volume needs of mass-market beverages.

3. Strategic insight: Manufacturers can monetize existing mature products by unlocking new cross-scenario value for older niche offerings, matching the innovation needs of mainstream beverage brands. This allows manufacturers to open new sales channels and expand their customer base without heavy R&D investment.

This article analyzes emerging innovation trends and core pain points for brands in the current beverage industry, offering strategic direction for food and beverage supply chain service providers.

1. Industry trend: As beverage recipes grow increasingly homogeneous and supply chain transparency improves, industry competition has shifted from price and flavor competition to competition over user experience and incremental details. Brand demand for low-risk, low-cost innovation solutions has grown sharply, making incremental packaging innovation a new industry trend.

2. Core client pain points: Brands普遍 face long R&D cycles, high upfront investment, and significant trial-and-error risk when launching new products. Additionally, many functional ingredients such as active probiotics struggle to survive in beverages, and direct addition undermines product concepts — these are core unmet pain points.

3. Solution direction: Service providers can curate and integrate existing mature niche functional packaging products, optimize them for different beverage scenarios, and offer ready-to-use innovation solutions to brands. By improving user experience and solving existing problems of high cost and poor performance, providers can help brands lower the barrier to innovation.

This article highlights emerging trends in beverage innovation, offering insights for sourcing and operations for catering supply chain platforms and e-commerce platforms.

1. Market demand: Beverage brands' demand for mature functional packaging is growing rapidly, yet supply of products such as particle-containing functional straws is extremely limited on mainstream e-commerce and supply chain platforms, creating a clear market gap.

2. Sourcing direction: Platforms can proactively onboard manufacturers like Guangdong Haoxinqing, which produces functional packaging and candy-toy hybrid products, to expand supply chain categories and meet brands' incremental innovation demand. Platforms can also create dedicated packaging innovation zones to improve supply-demand matching efficiency.

3. Operations and risk mitigation: Since these products have low technical barriers and are prone to homogeneous competition, platforms can guide sellers to build differentiation through product experience optimization, standardize product marketing claims to avoid consumer controversy from overhyped gimmicks, and remind brands that packaging innovation is only an incremental enhancement to help brands set reasonable innovation priorities.

This article uses Luckin's probiotic straw innovation as a case study to present new trends, business models and open questions in the current beverage industry, offering high value for industrial research.

1. New industry trend: As product formulation homogeneity intensifies, supply chain transparency improves, and consumer novelty for new flavors fades, industry competition has upgraded from early-stage price and flavor competition to competition over experience and incremental details. Detail innovation in areas like packaging has emerged as a new competitive frontier.

2. New business model: A "light innovation" business model built on cross-scenario reuse of mature niche solutions has emerged. This model adapts existing mature technology to new scenarios, drastically reducing trial-and-error costs and shortening development timelines for new products, perfectly aligning with leading brands' frequent new product launch strategy, and delivering a far higher return on investment than traditional deep R&D models.

3. New open research questions: This light innovation model has low technical barriers, shallow competitive moats, and a very short window of differentiation advantage. Key new industry questions that merit further research include how to balance light innovation and core product R&D, and how companies can sustain long-term differentiated competitiveness.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

这次瑞幸选择开外挂。

靠包装做差异化、赚话题、拉动尝鲜,是当下饮品行业心照不宣的创新捷径。

近期瑞幸的一次上新,把这条捷径玩到了吸管上。

7月13日,瑞幸乳酸菌美式重新上线。消费者可以在购买时选择普通吸管或“百亿活菌吸管”,暂时不需要额外付费。

每根吸管为独立包装,透明吸管里装着白色颗粒,两端用滤网封住。咖啡进入吸管后,颗粒逐渐溶解,每根吸管宣称含有不少于100亿CFU的活性益生菌。

概念很新,产品却很老。

20年前,类似的调味吸管已经在海外完成商业化,随后却长期停留在儿童零食和小众饮品市场,甚至国内都鲜少见到。

一项被市场冷落多年的产品,为什么会在2026年被瑞幸重新捡起?

一根有“前史”的吸管

很多人把这款乳酸菌吸管当成饮品创新的新方向,但事实上,这类吸管并非新发明,甚至可以追溯到2005年。

当年澳大利亚公司Unistraw推出Sipahh调味吸管,在透明管体中装入可溶解颗粒,用来把普通牛奶变成巧克力、草莓等口味。液体经过吸管时带走部分颗粒,消费者无需另外加入糖浆或冲调粉。该产品后来进入40多个国家和地区,累计销量一度超过10亿根。

2008年,《时代》杂志已经报道过装有冻干益生菌颗粒的吸管。2011年,Unistraw又与益生菌原料企业Ganeden合作,计划将BC30菌株装入吸管,用在常温奶和果汁包装上。

瑞幸这次采用的产品思路,可以说20年前已经完成了商业验证,但另一方面,它其实也是一个被时代淘汰的产品。

十年前红餐供应链指南就购买过类似产品,坦白说,这类产品没能大规模普及,先天硬伤十分明显。

首先制造端并无太高技术门槛,核心就是硬管腔体+两端密封+内填物料的简单结构,但相比单只成本1-2分钱的普通PP吸管,它多出了颗粒填充、两端封合等工序,单只成本便是普通吸管的数倍,对走量的大众饮品而言成本是偏高的。

红餐供应链指南印象里,2015年购买Sipahh调味吸管时,国内的营销噱头是“牛奶吸管”,也就是配套纯牛奶使用,增加牛奶风味,因为是海外代购,单只售价大概在7-8元,价格算得上昂贵。

但性价比上更重要的短板其实是在饮用体验,管内颗粒溶解速度难以控制,往往饮品喝不到三分之一,风味或功能颗粒就已完全溶解,后半段直接回归原味。

而这个问题在瑞幸这款新品上依旧存在。

同类产品在国内也早有落地,但国内市场一直没有给这类产品留下一个稳定的品类名称。电商平台上曾经出现过“调味吸管”“魔法吸管”“牛奶伴侣”等叫法。类似商品至今仍在售卖,却很少进入主流饮料品牌的标准包装。

目前,电商平台还能找到售卖类似产品的品牌是光合星球,值得注意的是,光合星球这款“魔法吸吸棒”自称为“压片糖果吸管零食”。

旗舰店售卖的仅三个口味,分别为山楂、叶黄素酯以及红糖姜枣。配料表里放在前面的“抗性糊精”,官方表示是一种水溶性膳食纤维,由玉米淀粉加工而成。

这么看来,光合星球这款产品卖点已经明显对准儿童营养和日常饮水场景,品牌售卖的重点也更偏向功能概念。

但红餐供应链指南从买家图看到,或许是因为本就为糖果制品,该款“魔法吸吸棒”管内的颗粒物明显偏大,颗粒数量相比瑞幸的乳酸菌吸管也更多。虽然一定程度能解决溶解太快导致风味无法持续的痛点,但另一个不能忽略的问题是,颗粒数量增加后,吸管内部的阻力也会增加。颗粒间隙和两端滤口缩小了液体通过的空间,儿童也需要更用力吸吮。

事实上,如果想将这类吸管放在成人市场,处境也颇为尴尬。主打风味的话,消费者不如直接买风味饮品方便;主打功能,比如益生菌、维生素的话,又不如口服补剂剂量精准、效率高。再加上“吸管调味”的形式自带低龄感,很难让成年消费者产生专业、高端的认知,很难去突破“玩具式零食”的标签。

红餐供应链指南注意到,从产品包装来看,瑞幸这款活菌吸管由广东好心情食品集团汕头生物科技分公司供应,该公司定位为糖果生产企业,产品覆盖糖果、糖玩和饮料等多个品类,公开网页上也能找到该公司生产的“饮水乐变味吸管糖”的资料,不过,目前尚未在主流电商渠道找到明确的在售链接。

但显然,这款吸管已经属于成熟的独立成品,目前看来并非品牌专属开模定制,但红餐供应链指南也未在电商渠道看到单独售卖。

简单来说,瑞幸并未从零研发一款全新包材,只是将一款偏小众的成熟方案,平移到了咖啡饮品的新场景里。

明知有坑,为什么还往里跳?

明知道有先天短板,依然选择落地,其实也契合了这几年头部品牌降本增效+话题驱动的产品逻辑。

一款常规风味新品的落地,需要经历配方调试、稳定性测试、原料供应链对接、门店操作培训、品控标准升级等多个环节,研发周期短则一两个月,长则半年以上,还要承担原料库存、门店适配的固定成本。一旦市场反馈不佳,前期投入很容易打水漂。

头部新茶饮品牌这几年推这么多新品,也不是没有上线后悄然下架的案例。

而包材类的微创新,几乎把试错风险降到了零。

对品牌而言,这是一笔投入产出比极高的账:无需重新开模、无需改动咖啡生产线、无需调整配方工艺,仅通过更换一款现成吸管,就快速落地了“乳酸菌美式”的新品类概念,研发与试错成本几乎可以忽略不计。

而更深一层看,它其实也是在用包材的巧思绕开了产品创新的技术瓶颈。

活性乳酸菌对生存环境要求严苛,在咖啡的酸性液体中存活率会大幅下降,若直接加入咖啡液,要么牺牲活菌数量,要么调整配方酸度,最终都会让“百亿活菌”的产品概念打折扣。

将活菌冻干粉封存在吸管的独立腔体中,饮用时随液体冲调进入杯中,既避开了咖啡液对活菌的破坏,完整保留了产品核心概念,又不需要对咖啡原液的生产链路做大幅改造,供应链适配成本极低。

这种“轻资产”的创新模式,也完美适配瑞幸高频上新的产品策略。

作为行业内上新速度最快的品牌之一,瑞幸几乎1-3个月就会推出新品,这种上新速度意味着不可能每一款都投入重金做深度研发。用包材微创新制造新鲜感,用低成本快速试错,卖得好就追加订单,反馈一般就及时止损,灵活度远高于传统的配方创新。

目前该款产品售价11.9元,瑞幸暂时没有向消费者收取吸管升级费用,新增成本显然没有突破瑞幸现有的价格体系。

这其实也是包材创新可参考的路径:未必需要突破性技术,很多时候只是成熟方案的跨场景复用。用可控的成本增量,换取一款新品的话题度与差异化感知,在产品口味创新越来越难的当下,这笔账远比打磨一款全新配方更划算。

颗粒度战争

不过,故事还有另一面。

包材创新的红利窗口期,正在变短。

当一个“巧思”被验证有效,模仿者会以极快的速度跟进。瑞幸的联名杯套被模仿、喜茶的设计语言被复刻、甚至连“吸管里装东西”这个思路,一旦出圈,其他品牌找到同样的供应商并不困难——毕竟,这并非品牌专属开模定制。

广东好心情食品集团能给瑞幸供应活菌吸管,也能给其他品牌供应。技术门槛低,意味着护城河浅。

更深层的问题还是:当包材创新成为标配,它还能制造差异化吗?

差异化记忆点的本质是“稀缺”。一旦不稀缺,记忆点就变成了噪音。

这也意味着,包材创新的红利属于先行者,而且窗口期有限,瑞幸在这根吸管上吃到的话题红利,不会维持很久。之后,它要么继续寻找下一个包材巧思,要么回到配方创新的硬仗里去。

回到餐饮行业来看,当产品配方越来越同质化,当供应链越来越透明,消费者就越来越难以被“又一款新口味”打动,这倒逼品牌开始把目光投向那些过去被忽视的细节:一根吸管、一个杯盖、一层杯贴……

这不是坏事。它说明行业正在从“卷价格”“卷口味”走向“卷体验”“卷细节”。

但也需要清醒:包材创新是锦上添花,不是雪中送炭。

心智上建立认知认同要,食用上夯实体验质感也要,消费者很难会只因为一根有风味或功能颗粒的吸管就成为忠实用户,也不会只因为一个联名杯贴就长期复购,但无数个这样的细节叠加在一起,就给了用户一个选择你的理由。

注:文/专注餐饮供应链的,文章来源:餐饮供应链指南(公众号ID:cygylzn),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:餐饮供应链指南

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

瑞幸的百亿活菌吸管是什么?

这是瑞幸随乳酸菌美式推出的可选免费吸管,每根独立包装,内部封装不少于100亿CFU的活性益生菌,饮用时活菌随咖啡液体冲调进入体内,可避开咖啡酸性环境对活菌的破坏,无需改动咖啡原有生产链路。

调味功能吸管为什么此前没有大范围普及?

这类吸管的制造成本是普通PP吸管的数倍,对走量的大众饮品而言成本偏高;同时管内颗粒溶解速度难以控制,往往饮品仅喝三分之一颗粒就完全溶解,后半段回归原味,饮用体验存在明显短板。

饮品品牌做包材微创新有哪些优势?

包材微创新无需改动产品生产线、调整配方工艺,研发与试错成本几乎可忽略不计,能快速落地新品概念,适配品牌高频上新的策略,还可绕开部分产品技术瓶颈,投入产出比远高于传统配方创新。

调味功能吸管目前主要适用哪些场景?

早期调味吸管主要面向儿童零食、小众饮品场景,多作为牛奶伴侣使用,国内现有同类产品也多主打儿童营养、日常饮水场景,瑞幸将其平移到咖啡饮品的成人消费场景进行探索落地。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0