广告
加载中

张雪峰最担心的事发生了

李响 2026-06-30 11:51
李响 2026/06/30 11:51

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文曝光了当前高考志愿填报咨询领域的诈骗陷阱,整理核心重点和防骗干货如下:

1. 当前行业常见诈骗套路:一是人设造假,号称十年经验的资深专家多是入职不到两个月的新人,甚至是在校大学生兼职,所有头衔都是自封的;二是证书伪造,国家从未颁发过高考志愿规划师职业资格证书,不法分子花百来块就能制作假证,包装后收费上万元;三是服务掺假,约九成从业者用免费AI拼凑志愿方案,顾问自身都看不懂方案内容;还有不法分子诱导考生转去自考机构,每推荐一人能拿两万元提成。

2. 防骗提醒:家长不要被商家制造的焦虑拿捏,警惕天价志愿服务,面对所谓专家要多留心眼,避免上当受骗。

本文围绕高考志愿填报咨询赛道乱象展开,对布局教育知识服务领域的品牌商有这些参考干货:

1. 市场与消费趋势:普通家庭对高考志愿填报的信息咨询需求旺盛,愿意为打破信息差的靠谱服务付费,张雪峰的志愿填报服务曾创下3小时售罄入账2亿元的成绩,涨价后依然火速售罄,说明赛道市场空间充足。

2. 用户行为观察:用户更认可真诚、有专业积累、能真实解决问题的品牌,抓住普通家庭信息闭塞、试错成本低的痛点,输出实在内容就能获得用户信任。

3. 品牌建设启示:靠虚假包装、制造焦虑收割的模式会透支整个行业的信任,只有坚持真实专业、为用户着想,才能长期立足,打造有公信力的品牌。

本文曝光了高考志愿咨询赛道的乱象,给赛道内的从业者整理了风险、机会和可参考经验如下:

1. 风险提示:目前伪专家诈骗已经被央视曝光,教育部已经发布预警,市场监管部门也将跟进查处,靠人设造假、伪造证书收割用户的违规模式随时会被查处,就算更换招牌换领域行骗,也最终会失去信任。

2. 机会提示:赛道需求旺盛,普通家庭对靠谱的志愿咨询服务需求远未被满足,只要提供真实专业的服务,就有很大的增长空间。

3. 可学习经验:张雪峰的模式值得参考,投入精力积累真实院校、专业、就业数据,输出直白有用的避坑建议,平衡内容和变现,真诚为用户着想,才能获得用户信任,实现长期良性经营。

本文围绕个人IP商业化、流量变现的逻辑展开,对工厂推进数字化转型、布局线上业务和自有品牌有这些启示干货:

1. 流量信任逻辑启示:无论哪个行业,流量只有从真实专业的产品和服务中生长出来才能站稳脚跟,靠造假、炒作获取流量,最终只会消耗消费者信任,难以长期发展,工厂布局线上业务也要坚持以真实产品积累信任。

2. 需求洞察启示:抓住普通用户的真实痛点、填补信息差就能获得市场认可,张雪峰抓住普通家庭志愿填报的信息差需求实现快速商业化,工厂做C端产品也可以从挖掘用户未被满足的真实需求切入,打开市场空间。

3. 商业化启示:要平衡内容传播和商业变现,不能一味追求短期利益收割用户,只有长期维护信任才能做成品牌。

本文梳理了高考志愿咨询知识服务赛道的现状,给知识服务领域的服务商整理了这些干货:

1. 行业发展趋势:直播知识服务原本已经逐步走向正规化,本次造假乱象会加速行业洗牌,不合规的玩家会被清退,整个行业会逐步走向规范,未来市场会向专业靠谱的玩家集中。

2. 客户核心痛点:家长和考生的核心痛点是高考志愿填报的信息差,普通家庭孩子试错成本低,家长焦虑感强,愿意为靠谱的信息服务支付高价,需求十分明确。

3. 发展方向建议:服务商要回归真实、专业和职业底线,投入精力积累真实的行业数据,输出经得起推敲的真实方案,靠专业和真诚积累用户信任,走长期发展的路线。

本文曝光了直播知识服务领域的诈骗乱象,对布局知识服务赛道的平台整理了运营和风险规避的干货如下:

1. 当前平台存在的问题:部分入驻商家利用平台流量,形成了人设造假、证书伪造、AI拼凑方案、诱导考生转卖赚提成的完整诈骗产业链,既损害了用户利益,也给平台声誉带来负面影响。

2. 平台运营改进方向:需要加强对知识服务类商家的资质审核,建立完善的用户投诉处理机制,及时查处违规商家,避免违规商家更换招牌后继续在平台行骗。

3. 风险规避提示:天价知识服务、过度制造焦虑的营销内容是高发风险点,平台需要对这类内容进行重点监测,提前做好风险预警,保障赛道良性发展,维护平台整体声誉。

本文曝光了直播知识服务领域的新动态新问题,给行业研究者提供了这些研究素材和参考:

1. 产业新动向:高考志愿填报咨询已经成为直播知识服务领域的热门细分赛道,市场需求旺盛,商业化空间大,头部玩家的单品类服务就能实现3小时入账2亿元的销售额,展现了赛道的增长潜力。

2. 行业新问题:行业目前缺乏统一的职业资质标准,不法分子利用家长的焦虑和信息差,形成了完整的收割产业链,本次乱象透支了整个行业的信用,将原本走向正规的赛道拖回了野蛮生长的状态,也给监管带来了新的挑战。

3. 商业模式研究:行业存在两种截然不同的商业模式,一种是靠专业积累、填补信息差、服务用户的良性变现模式,一种是靠虚假包装收割焦虑的短期套利模式,后者不可持续,也会危害整个行业发展。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article exposes common fraud schemes in the college application consulting industry, and summarizes key takeaways and anti-fraud tips as follows:

1. Common industry fraud tactics: First, fake credentials. Many self-proclaimed "senior experts with 10 years of experience" are actually new hires with less than two months on the job, or even part-time college students, and all their titles are self-granted. Second, forged certificates. China has never issued a national vocational qualification for "college application planner"; scammers can buy a fake certificate for around 100 yuan, then charge clients upwards of 10,000 yuan for their "certified" services. Third, substandard service. Roughly 90% of practitioners cobble together application plans using free AI tools, and the consultants themselves cannot even explain the content of the plans they deliver. Additionally, some scammers诱导 students to transfer to self-taught higher education institutions, earning a 20,000 yuan commission for each referral.

2. Anti-fraud reminders: Parents should avoid being manipulated by marketing-induced anxiety, stay alert to overpriced college application services, and vet so-called "experts" carefully to avoid being scammed.

This article analyzes the chaos in the college application consulting industry, with key takeaways for brands looking to enter the education knowledge service space:

1. Market and consumer trends: Ordinary households have strong demand for information consulting on college application, and are willing to pay for reliable services that close information gaps. Zhang Xuefeng's college application consulting service sold out in 3 hours, generating 200 million yuan in revenue, and sold out again immediately after a price hike, proving that the market still has substantial room for growth.

2. User behavior observations: Users trust brands that are sincere, professionally credible, and actually solve their problems. Brands that address the core pain points of information scarcity and high error costs for ordinary households, and deliver practical, actionable content, can build strong user trust.

3. Brand building insights: Harvesting users through false packaging and anxiety marketing erodes trust across the entire industry. Only brands that prioritize authenticity, professionalism, and user interests can build long-term credibility and sustainable growth.

This article exposes the chaos in the college application consulting industry, and summarizes risks, opportunities and actionable lessons for practitioners in the space:

1. Risk warning: Fake expert fraud has already been exposed by CCTV, and China's Ministry of Education has issued an official alert, with market regulators set to follow up with enforcement. Illegal practices including faking professional credentials and forging certificates face imminent crackdowns. Even if scammers rebrand and shift to other sectors, they will eventually lose public trust.

2. Opportunity outlook: Market demand for the sector remains strong, and the need for reliable college application consulting services among ordinary households is far from satisfied. Providers that deliver authentic, professional services have significant room for growth.

3. Actionable lessons: Zhang Xuefeng's business model is a valuable reference. Investing in building a real, up-to-date database of colleges, majors and employment outcomes, delivering straightforward, practical advice to help users avoid pitfalls, balancing content value with monetization, and prioritizing user interests sincerely are the keys to building user trust and achieving long-term, healthy operation.

This article explores the logic of personal IP commercialization and traffic monetization, with key insights for factories pursuing digital transformation, online business expansion and private brand building:

1. Insights on traffic and trust: No matter the industry, traffic rooted in authentic, high-quality products and services is the only sustainable foundation. Gaining traffic through fraud or hype only erodes consumer trust and cannot sustain long-term growth. Factories expanding online should also build trust through authentic, high-quality products.

2. Insights on demand insight: Capturing ordinary users' real pain points and closing information gaps can win market recognition. Zhang Xuefeng achieved rapid commercial success by addressing the information gap demand for college application among ordinary households. Similarly, factories developing C-end products can also open up new market space by targeting unmet real user demands.

3. Insights on commercialization: Brands must balance content distribution and commercial monetization, rather than only pursuing short-term profit by harvesting users. Only long-term trust building can build a sustainable brand.

This article sorts out the current status of the college application knowledge service sector, with key takeaways for knowledge service providers:

1. Industry development trends: Live-streamed knowledge services were already moving toward standardization, and this recent exposure of widespread fraud will accelerate industry consolidation. Non-compliant players will be pushed out, and the industry will gradually move toward regulation, with future market share concentrating on professional, reliable players.

2. Core customer pain points: The core pain point for parents and applicants is the information gap in college application. For children from ordinary households, the cost of error is low, leaving parents with high anxiety and a willingness to pay premium prices for reliable information services, with very clear demand.

3. Recommendations for development: Service providers should return to the bottom line of authenticity, professionalism and ethics. They should invest in building real, reliable industry data, deliver solid, verifiable application plans, build user trust through professionalism and sincerity, and pursue a long-term development path.

This article exposes fraud in the live-streamed knowledge service sector, with operational and risk mitigation takeaways for platforms operating in the knowledge service space:

1. Existing problems on platforms: Some participating merchants have built a complete fraud chain leveraging platform traffic, including fake personas, forged certificates, AI-generated plans, and referral commissions for luring students to other institutions. This harms both user interests and platform reputation.

2. Directions for operational improvement: Platforms need to strengthen qualification vetting for knowledge service merchants, establish complete user complaint handling mechanisms, and crack down on non-compliant merchants in a timely manner, preventing scammers from rebranding and continuing fraudulent activity on the platform.

3. Risk mitigation reminders: Overpriced knowledge services and marketing that excessive stokes anxiety are high-risk red flags. Platforms should prioritize monitoring of this content and implement proactive risk alerts, to support healthy industry development and protect the platform's overall reputation.

This article exposes new developments and problems in the live-streamed knowledge service sector, providing research materials and references for industry researchers:

1. New industry trends: College application consulting has become a popular niche segment in live-streamed knowledge services, with strong market demand and large commercial space. A top player generated 200 million yuan in sales from this single service category in just 3 hours, demonstrating the segment's strong growth potential.

2. New emerging industry problems: The sector currently lacks unified professional qualification standards. Bad actors have built a complete profit chain exploiting parental anxiety and information asymmetry. This widespread fraud has undermined industry-wide trust, pulled a sector that was moving toward standardization back into a state of unregulated wild growth, and created new challenges for regulators.

3. Business model research: Two distinct business models exist in the sector. One is a sustainable monetization model built on professional accumulation, closing information gaps and serving user needs. The other is a short-term arbitrage model that harvests anxious users through false packaging. The latter is unsustainable and harms the development of the entire industry.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

全是假的,一不小心就会掉入陷阱。

出品 | 电商派Pro作者 | 李响

张雪峰离世后的第一个高考季,就这么来了。

往年这个时候,许多家长会守着看他的直播,碰上拿不准的志愿问题,总想听听他怎么说。

他观点不是人人都认同,但大家能感觉出来,他说的是实在话,是自己琢磨出来的东西,是真心替学生着想,不是为了哄人掏钱编出来的。

也正是因为这份真诚和实在,很多家长愿意相信他。

此前,有博主晒出和他的聊天记录,家长们恍然发现,张雪峰的牵挂从没断过。聊天里,对方劝他好好休息,他却说,怕家长们上当受骗。

他怕普通家庭的孩子因为信息闭塞踩错人生的坑,更怕有人盯着家长的焦虑,把本该填平的信息差,变成收割的镰刀。

可谁也没想到,张雪峰生前最担心的事,还是发生了。

近日,央视曝光了高考志愿填报咨询里的种种陷阱,一群伪专家打着指导的旗号收割家长,造假、用AI敷衍、诱导报自考,简直毫无底线。

李响看完,脑子里反复浮现一个词:全是假的。

人设虚假,身份伪造,证书不实,服务掺假,连最后拿到的方案,也是从免费AI工具直接搬运的,家长花几千上万元换来的东西,可能还不如自己用手机询问AI来得可靠。

这已不是服务质量高低的问题,是彻底的直播带货欺诈。

要知道,张雪峰与直播电商的渊源可追溯至2016年,当时他已开始通过淘宝直播为考研课程站台。

但真正的商业化布局集中于2023年至2024年:2023年,京东上线“张雪峰推荐”专区,主推电子产品;同年其公司申请注册“雪峰甄选”商标,被视作进军带货的信号;紧接着,公司经营范围新增广播电视节目制作等业务,为直播铺路。

2024年,其商业化步伐显著加快,不仅开启了高考志愿填报服务直播,同年公司还成立旅行社推出研学产品。

尽管动作频频,张雪峰对“带货主播”身份却态度矛盾,曾公开拒绝头部机构邀请,并称主播是最不重要的环节,同时呼吁粉丝理性消费。

今年3月,张雪峰去世后,其团队继续直播,一场5个多小时的直播吸引600万人次观看,在线峰值突破13万。

从早期教育内容输出到后期大规模商业变现,张雪峰的个人IP始终在内容与带货之间寻找平衡。

李响认为,张雪峰当年能出圈,靠的并不是网红主播的噱头,而是对专业的积累。他的判断建立在由真实数据支撑的信息差之上,那是一点一滴花时间、花精力准备出来的。

他会告诉普通农村家庭的孩子,这个分数报这所学校、这个专业,将来出路会更稳当,帮他们避开那些虚浮的选项。

他的用心和真诚,让“高考规划师”这个职业,有了一份沉甸甸的分量。

可他一离世,市面上不少假规划师便抓住可乘之机,开始钻直播卖课的空子。

有机构销售坦言,那些号称十年经验的资深专家,多是入职不到两个月的新人,甚至有在校大学生暑期兼职。

家长花费上万元,以为对面坐着经验丰富的老师,实际只是一个背诵话术的年轻人,被问及细节时比家长更紧张。

还有销售表示,出门在外,身份都是自己给的。想当金牌规划师,便贴金牌标签;想当首席专家,便挂首席名头;那些教授级别,也是自己加上的头衔。

这还只是人设,更荒谬的是那纸证书。

据了解,国家从未颁发过高考志愿规划师这种职业资格证书,根本没有这东西。

但有人自己动手造,在电商平台花百来块钱就能购得一张。

有机构人员甚至声称,提供一张照片,就能用软件合成一张证书,毫无顾忌。

细想下来,这跟办假证一个套路,区别只在于价格,假证贩子开价两百,他们包装后收费一万。

有了虚假人设与伪造证书,接下来进入服务环节。

但身份都已造假,怎么可能有真才实学。

有高考咨询平台表示,约九成从业者依赖AI拼凑方案。

所谓拼凑,就是把考生的分数、省份、选科等基本信息输入免费AI工具,数秒后生成一份文档,换个封面,调整格式,便直接交付家长。

有销售人员坦承,时常让AI代写方案,自己都不清楚内容在说什么。

将孩子的命运托付给一个什么弄不明白的人,细思极恐。

离谱的是,这些方案的收费从4980元到12980元不等。

一个家庭辛苦积攒的钱,换来的不过是他人动动手指、用免费工具跑出的几页纸。家长却还心怀感激,以为遇到专业服务,解决了天大难题。

但事实上,这些机构连AI生成的方案都不真心交付,目的根本不在志愿填报,只是单纯想敛财。

以武汉某机构为例,负责人坦言,他们的目的就是将这些孩子引导到自考本科等办学机构,每推荐一个学生,提成两万元。

他们有一套完备的流流程。先在直播间制造焦虑,渲染志愿填报失误将耽误孩子一生,再将人拉入微信群。群里多半是托儿,假扮家长哄抢名额,制造火爆假象。

紧迫感之下,家长头脑发热,见旁人纷纷下单,便觉得不掏钱就来不及。

整套动作环环相扣,每一步都踩在焦虑点上,让家长心甘情愿掏钱购买。

从头到尾,人设造假、证书伪造、方案由AI拼凑,最后连孩子都被当作人头卖给自考机构赚返点。

这条产业链相当完整,而支撑它的,无非是家长的焦虑和信息差带来的套利空间。

此事引人深思。

在李响看来,直播卖课、直播咨询,这种商业模式本身并无问题。

就拿张雪峰来说,当年他的志愿填报服务卖得相当火爆。

2024年高考季,其售卖的志愿填报服务在3小时内售罄,创造“3小时入账2亿元”的纪录;到了2025年,这项服务的价格比前一年上涨一千块,依旧火速售罄。

当时的张雪峰,精准捕捉到普通家庭在志愿填报时的焦虑与无助,将庞杂的院校、专业与就业数据,转化为清晰、直白的“避坑指南”和“机会清单”。

这种打破教育信息差的定位被无数家长点赞,影响力也迅速扩大。

但如今这些从业者却全然不同。

他们不做积累,不投入研究,不提供真实建议,将全部精力倾注于包装、引流,以及如何从每位家长身上榨取最大利益。

流量若从真实专业中长出来,便能站得住脚。

若靠骗、靠演、靠P图获取,就只是一笔焦虑税。税一收完,信任随之崩塌。这次坍塌的,不止那几个被央视点名的机构。

这番操作,将整个志愿填报咨询行业的信用都透支了。

日后家长再听到规划师三个字,心中都会打个问号。

直播知识服务这条赛道,本已走向正规,被如此搅局,又拖回原始野蛮的状态。

报道发布后,教育部迅速发布预警,提醒家长警惕天价志愿规划师,相关市场监管部门也表示将跟进处理。

这些动作固然必要,但事后查处的速度,往往追不上收割的速度。

待查到头上,对方可能已更换招牌,用同样套路在另一领域重新开张。

冷静思索,真正能堵住漏洞的,也许是让更多普通家庭自身先清醒,人越焦虑,越容易被拿捏。

行业里太多人专门研究怎样制造焦虑,让家长觉得不找他们就无路可走。

那些钻空子的人,盯着这份焦虑做生意。他们售卖的,是一个伪造的身份,一份AI生成的文档,和一个不知通往何方的推荐,让不少家长被骗惨了。

平心而论,为志愿填报服务付费本身并无不可,但从业者至少应拿出经得起推敲的真实建议,而非徒有形式的空壳方案。

但事实是,许多所谓的“规划师”,连孩子的名字都不曾认真看过,连方案里的建议都讲不出所以然,就敢将上万元的收费单递到家长面前,毫无职业底线和良知。

央视这次曝光,也算是给家长们提了个醒。知识付费背后的水很深,高考志愿填报这件事,还是得多留个心眼,马虎不得。

放眼行业,若想仍有人愿在直播间为知识付费,愿让家长坐下来听上半小时,从业者必须把丢掉的东西捡回来。把真实捡回来,把专业捡回来,把良心捡回来。

否则,这次是志愿填报,下次可能换作其他领域。

但人心经不起反复欺骗,骗过几次,信任便碎了。

今年夏天,对很多刚走出考场的学生和守在考场外的家长来说,本该充满希望。

如今许多人回头看,大概只剩庆幸或后怕。

还没上当的,还有躲过一劫的机会。已经踩坑的,耗费金钱与时间,最终拿到的方案,不知是否已在悄然间,将孩子引向本不该走的路。

早些时候,张雪峰曾在直播里直白地说:“越是底层的家庭,孩子的试错机会就越少。一个选择失误,可能需要整个家庭用数年甚至数十年去弥补。”

面对如此触目惊心的直播乱象,大家能做的就是多留个心眼,别让疏忽变成日后的遗憾。

注:文/李响,文章来源:电商报(公众号ID:kandianshang),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:电商报

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0