广告
加载中

网红餐厅背后 藏着一门“造牌生意”

红餐编辑部 2026-06-16 17:17
红餐编辑部 2026/06/16 17:17

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文主要揭露了当下商场层出不穷的网红餐厅背后,是一门成型的餐饮批量造牌新生意,核心干货如下:

1. 很多看似独立的网红新品牌,背后其实是同一家餐饮集团,目前有两种主流批量造牌路径:一类是像万拾合宜一样捕捉消费热点快速孵化跨品类网红品牌,另一类是像7分甜母公司一样拆解饮品细分赛道,用品牌矩阵覆盖不同客群。

2. 这门生意能跑通,是餐饮集团和购物中心双向需求契合的结果:商场需要新品牌首店造话题吸引客流,还能降低空铺风险;餐饮集团需要核心商圈的流量势能放大品牌声量,双方合作共赢。

3. 目前这种模式还在早期验证阶段,多数品牌还只是流量网红,能否长期留住消费者还有待观察。

本文梳理了餐饮行业批量造牌的新趋势,对餐饮品牌商布局发展有较多参考干货,具体如下:

1. 消费趋势变化:社交媒体环境下,餐饮品牌的流量周期大幅缩短,从过去十年缩短到一两年甚至更短,单品牌押注风险大幅升高,批量多品牌布局已经成为头部餐饮企业对冲风险的主流策略。

2. 品牌打造与渠道建设:新品牌走红核心逻辑是高颜值+强社交传播+核心商圈精准选址,和购物中心招商需求高度契合,和优质商业地产深度绑定,先开标杆首店造话题,再用热度拿到更多优质点位,扩张效率远高于传统模式。

3. 风险提示:当前多数新品牌仍停留在流量层面,距离沉淀为长期可增值的品牌资产还有较大差距,品牌商需要兼顾流量打造和长期运营能力建设。

这篇文章拆解了餐饮批量造牌的新商业模式,给餐饮卖家带来了明确的机会提示和风险提醒,干货如下:

1. 市场机会:当下年轻消费者追求新鲜感,购物中心也将首店网红品牌作为核心招商方向,只要踩中细分热点,遵循正确的造牌逻辑,新品牌依然可以快速起势获得流量,批量造牌模式可以对冲单品牌流量下滑的风险,适合有运营能力的卖家尝试。

2. 扩张与合作:可以借鉴业内通用的扩张路径:先在发源地打磨门店模型,再进入一线城市标杆购物中心开首店造排队话题,再以此为筹码向新一线城市核心商圈扩张,和成熟商业地产深度绑定,合作效率更高,更容易拿到优质点位。

3. 风险提示:目前行业内多数试水的新品牌存活情况不佳,不少品牌已经关店,若只追短期流量不打磨产品和运营,流量红利消退后很容易被市场淘汰,不要盲目跟风。

餐饮业批量造牌的新发展趋势,给餐饮供应链工厂带来了新的需求和商业机会,核心干货如下:

1. 产品生产与设计需求变化:当下新品牌覆盖品类极广,从正餐到茶饮甜品应有尽有,品牌推新速度快,淘汰率也高,要求工厂能够适配多品类小批量的灵活生产,快速响应新品牌的产品调整需求,跟上品牌推新节奏。

2. 商业机会:越来越多餐饮集团布局多品牌孵化业务,对稳定靠谱的供应链需求大幅提升,工厂如果能够对接这类头部孵化集团,就能获得稳定的批量订单,拓展大客户资源,实现业务增长。

3. 升级启示:多品牌集团对供应链的数字化调度能力要求更高,工厂加快数字化升级,提升多订单多品类的管理能力,才能适配行业新需求,同时要注意筛选合作方,降低新品牌淘汰带来的合作风险。

餐饮多品牌工厂化的新趋势,给餐饮各类服务商带来了新的市场机会和方向,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展新趋势:中国餐饮已经正式从单品牌增长阶段进入多品牌工厂化阶段,企业的核心竞争力变成持续批量孵化品牌的能力,整个行业对专业服务商的需求比以往更大,市场空间广阔。

2. 客户核心痛点:这类批量造牌的餐饮集团,核心需求是能够快速高效推出新品牌,痛点集中在快速品牌设计、社交传播运营、选址对接、多品牌供应链管理、数字化系统支持这些方面,要求服务能够适配批量快速复制的节奏。

3. 解决方案方向:服务商可以针对批量造牌的需求,打造打包式的标准化服务,比如新品牌网红定位设计、社交话题运营、商业地产资源对接、多品牌运营系统等,同时还可以延伸长期服务,帮助客户打造长期品牌资产,拓展盈利空间。

本文分析了批量造牌模式和购物中心平台的合作逻辑,给商业平台的招商运营提供了不少参考干货,具体如下:

1. 行业新需求变化:当下消费者逛商场的核心需求从购物转向体验和新鲜感,能够持续推出新网红品牌的孵化集团,已经成为商场的优质合作伙伴,和单个集团合作多个品牌,对接效率远高于对接多个独立品牌。

2. 运营层面的好处:这类集团可以帮助商场降低空铺风险,当某个品牌热度下滑,集团可以直接换牌续租,不需要商场重新招商,减少空铺损失,同时新首店可以制造话题,吸引年轻客群,拉动商场整体客流。

3. 风险规避方向:要注意这类新品牌大多依赖短期流量红利,长期生命力不足,合作的时候可以约定灵活的换牌条款,同时优先筛选运营能力强、有长期品牌规划的集团合作,避免频繁换牌影响商场的整体口碑。

本文披露了餐饮业最新的批量造牌产业动向,对餐饮产业研究有较高的参考价值,核心干货如下:

1. 产业新动向:当下中国餐饮正在从单品牌增长模式,迈向多品牌工厂化的新阶段,企业的核心资产不再是单个品牌,而是一套可持续孵化品牌的能力,企业通过多赛道布局提高成功概率,对冲单品牌流量周期缩短的风险,目前主要有跨品类热点孵化、垂直细分品牌矩阵两种成熟商业模式。

2. 新型产业合作模式:批量造牌生意是餐饮集团和购物中心平台的双向合谋,商场需要新鲜感降空铺风险,品牌需要核心商圈流量,双方共赢推动了模式的规模化,改变了传统餐饮品牌扩张和商场招商的逻辑。

3. 需要研究的新问题:目前该模式仍处于早期阶段,多数新品牌只是流量品牌,尚未沉淀为长期可增值的品牌资产,不少试水品牌已经关停,如何从造流量品牌转向运营长期品牌资产,是该模式需要解决的核心问题,后续发展值得持续跟踪研究。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article uncovers the emerging business of mass-producing viral F&B brands behind the flood of Instagram-worthy new restaurants in shopping malls today. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Many seemingly independent viral new F&B brands are actually owned by the same group. Two mainstream mass-brand-building models have emerged: one, like Wanshi Heyi, captures consumption hot spots to quickly incubate cross-category viral brands; the other, like the parent company of 7 Fen Tian, splits beverage sub-segments and covers different customer groups with a brand matrix.

2. This business model is sustainable because it aligns the mutual needs of F&B groups and shopping malls: malls need first stores of new brands to generate buzz, draw foot traffic and reduce the risk of vacant storefronts, while F&B groups need the traffic momentum of core business districts to amplify brand awareness, creating a win-win partnership.

3. This model is still in the early validation stage. Most of these brands are just internet-famous for traffic, and their ability to retain consumers in the long run remains to be seen.

This article sorts out the new trend of mass brand building in the F&B industry, with actionable insights for F&B brand operators:

1. Shifting consumption landscape: Under the social media ecosystem, the traffic lifecycle of F&B brands has shortened dramatically from a decade to just 1-2 years or even less. Betting on a single brand carries far higher risk, so multi-brand portfolio expansion has become a mainstream risk-mitigation strategy for leading F&B players.

2. Brand building and channel development: New brands go viral primarily through a combination of aesthetic design, strong social sharing appeal and precise location selection in core business districts. This fits perfectly with the leasing demand of shopping malls. By partnering deeply with high-quality commercial real estate, operators first open flagship first stores to generate buzz, then leverage the heat to secure more premium locations, achieving far faster expansion than traditional models.

3. Risk warning: Most current new brands remain traffic-focused, and still have a long way to go before they become valuable long-term brand equity. Brand operators need to balance traffic generation with long-term operational capacity building.

This article breaks down the new business model of mass F&B brand building, with clear opportunity and risk alerts for F&B sellers. Key insights:

1. Market opportunity: Today’s young consumers are hungry for novelty, and shopping malls prioritize viral first-store brands for leasing. As long as you tap into a niche hot spot and follow the proven brand-building logic, new brands can still gain traction and traffic quickly. The mass-branding model also mitigates the risk of traffic decline for single brands, making it suitable for sellers with mature operational capabilities to explore.

2. Expansion and cooperation: You can learn from the industry-standard expansion path: refine your store model in your origin market first, then open a first store in a flagship shopping mall in a first-tier city to generate buzz and waiting lines, then use that as leverage to expand into core districts of new first-tier cities. Deep partnerships with established commercial real estate developers improve cooperation efficiency and make it much easier to secure premium locations.

3. Risk warning: Most new brands that have tested this model so far have low survival rates, and many have already closed. If you only chase short-term traffic without refining products and operations, you will likely be phased out once the traffic红利 fades. Do not follow the trend blindly.

The new trend of mass F&B brand building has created new demand and business opportunities for F&B supply chain factories. Key takeaways:

1. Changing product design and production demand: Today’s new brands cover a huge range of categories from full-service dining to bubble tea and desserts, with very fast launch cycles and high elimination rates. This requires factories to adapt to flexible multi-category, small-batch production, respond quickly to product adjustment requests from new brands, and keep up with their new product launch pace.

2. Business opportunity: A growing number of F&B groups are building multi-brand incubation businesses, leading to a sharp increase in demand for stable, reliable supply chains. If your factory can partner with these leading incubation groups, you can secure steady bulk orders, expand your key client base and drive business growth.

3. Implications for upgrading: Multi-brand groups have higher requirements for digital supply chain scheduling. Factories need to speed up digital upgrades to improve their ability to manage multi-category, multi-order portfolios to meet new industry demands, while also screening partners carefully to reduce cooperation risks caused by high new brand failure rates.

The new trend of factory-style multi-brand F&B incubation has opened up new market opportunities and directions for all types of F&B service providers. Key insights:

1. New industry development trend: China’s F&B industry has officially transitioned from a single-brand growth stage to a factory-style multi-brand stage. Enterprises’ core competitiveness now lies in the ability to continuously incubate brands at scale, which has created greater demand for professional service providers than ever before, with broad market space.

2. Core client pain points: Mass-branding F&B groups have the core demand of launching new brands quickly and efficiently. Their main pain points are concentrated in fast brand design, social media operation, location matching, multi-brand supply chain management and digital system support, requiring services that can adapt to the pace of mass, rapid replication.

3. Direction for solutions: Service providers can develop packaged, standardized services tailored to mass-branding demand, such as viral positioning design for new brands, social topic operation, commercial real estate resource matching, and multi-brand operation systems. They can also expand into long-term services to help clients build lasting brand equity and grow their profit margins.

This article analyzes the cooperation logic between the mass-branding model and shopping mall platforms, offering valuable reference for commercial platform leasing and operation. Key insights:

1. Changing industry demand: Consumers’ core motivation for visiting malls has shifted from shopping to experience and novelty. Incubation groups that can continuously launch new viral brands have become premium partners for malls. Working with one group for multiple brands delivers far higher matching efficiency than working with dozens of independent brands.

2. Operational benefits: These groups help malls reduce the risk of vacant storefronts. When a brand loses popularity, the group can directly replace it with a new brand and renew the lease, eliminating the need for malls to run a new leasing process and reducing vacancy losses. At the same time, new first stores generate buzz to attract young consumers and boost overall mall foot traffic.

3. Risk mitigation: Most of these new brands rely on short-term traffic红利 and lack long-term viability. Malls can negotiate flexible brand replacement terms in cooperation contracts, and prioritize partnering with groups that have strong operational capabilities and long-term brand planning to avoid frequent brand turnover hurting the mall’s overall reputation.

This article discloses the latest industrial trend of mass F&B brand building in China, offering high reference value for F&B industry research. Key findings:

1. New industrial trend: China’s F&B industry is transitioning from a single-brand growth model to a new stage of factory-style multi-brand incubation. Enterprises’ core asset is no longer a single brand, but a sustainable system capable of incubating new brands continuously. Firms increase their odds of success through multi-track layout and hedge against the risk of shortening single-brand traffic cycles. Two mature business models have emerged: cross-category hot-spot incubation and vertical niche brand matrix.

2. New-style industrial cooperation: The mass-branding business is a mutually beneficial collaboration between F&B groups and shopping mall platforms. Malls need novelty to reduce vacancy risk, while brands need traffic from core business districts. This win-win dynamic has driven the scaling of the model, and reshaped the traditional logic of F&B brand expansion and shopping mall leasing.

3. New research agendas: This model is still in an early stage. Most new brands remain traffic-focused and have not yet become long-term, valuable brand equity, and many trial brands have already closed. The core unresolved challenge for the model is how to shift from building traffic brands to cultivating long-term brand equity, and its future development warrants continuous tracking and research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

商场里不断冒出新的网红餐厅,背后是一门正在成型的“造牌生意”。

本文由红餐网(ID:hongcan18)原创首发,作者:李金枝;编辑:方圆。

“商场里的新网红餐厅,好像永远看不完。”

今天是韩式创意料理NEED,明天是云贵融合菜野果Yeego;前脚刚排完YEE 3三号椰,后脚又被种草朴下隆九。

这些品牌风格迥异,横跨韩餐、融合菜、茶饮、甜品或烘焙。但如果顺着品牌背后的股权关系继续追溯,就会发现越来越多爆红品牌背后,其实站着同一家餐饮集团。

批量造牌,正在成为餐饮业一门可复制的生意。

一家公司,十几个品牌

眼下,不少餐饮企业正在做同一件事:从“做一个品牌”,走向“造一批品牌”。但路径并不相同。

一类像餐饮行业的“MCN机构”,它们不断捕捉、甚至制造新的消费热点,并快速孵化品牌。

典型如“武汉餐饮五小龙”——万拾合宜、德川、甘趣餐创、卓智方健、泛嘉。近两年NEED、野果Yeego、The boots泥靴、三出山、O'eat、KCOOKING等,这些在一线城市引发排队热潮的品牌,大都出自这几家扎根武汉的餐饮管理公司。

其中,创立于2021年的万拾合宜,短短几年时间,先后孵化出韩式创意料理NEED、云贵融合菜野果Yeego、泰式小酒馆One More Thai泰铺、日料麻布食堂、美式松弛风餐厅Pick Chill……

这些品牌所属的品类跨度很大,但都在一线商圈出道、社交平台引发热议、线下更是一位难求。比如被称为“韩餐排队王”的NEED,新店开业排队2-3小时是常态,目前门店已经超过80家;Pick Chill上海首店开业后迅速成为热门打卡地。公开报道显示,五一期间门店等位一度超过五六百号。

朗行鼎胜集团旗下则集结了YEE 3三号椰、朴下隆九、抹岛抹茶、春柠香香、Church's Texas Chicken……覆盖椰子水、新鲜零食、抹茶饮品、柠檬茶、美式炸鸡等赛道。

这类公司并不深度绑定某个品类,今天是韩餐,明天可能是云贵菜,后天又会是其他赛道——品类本身并不重要,重要的是通过一套“高颜值+强传播+精准选址”的逻辑,让一个新品牌在短时间内变成商场里的话题中心。

在饮品赛道,这种多品牌战略则换了一种打法。

过去几年,7分甜母公司与饮之梦集团陆续孵化出泰柯茶园、OUO Gelato、柳皓方LIUHAOFANG、柚内、迈迈三三、轻茶山外、餹宋、九十葉、BLACK TREE、Yoojung优格家、连杏双皮奶等十多个品牌。

这些品牌几乎覆盖了当下茶饮和甜品赛道的所有热门方向。

与万拾合宜不同,7分甜和饮之梦更像是合作打造了一家垂直的餐饮孵化平台,将饮品相关细分赛道拆解成一个个独立品牌,用品牌矩阵覆盖不同消费场景和客群。

两条不同路径,指向同一个判断:餐饮行业的流量周期越来越短。在社交媒体时代,一个品牌从爆红到沉寂的周期正在不断缩短。过去一个品牌或许可以红十年,现在很多品牌的流量窗口可能只有一两年,甚至更短。对于企业来说,单押一个品牌的风险正在加大。与其把所有筹码押注在一个品牌身上等它跑出来,不如同时布局多个品牌,用组合对冲单一品牌的风险。

批量造牌,从这个角度来看,也是餐饮企业主动应对不确定性的经营策略。

个性化餐饮品牌与购物中心的合谋

但这门生意真正能够跑通,还需要另一方:购物中心。

过去几年,购物中心的招商逻辑逐渐发生转变。消费者越来越少为了“买东西”去逛商场。商场必须转而提供不可或缺的体验和兜售新鲜感,能持续制造话题的个性化网红品牌,成了它们最需要的东西。

上海绿地缤纷城负责招商的张彬(化名)表示,不少城市的商场招商团队如今将“首店数量”列为核心考核指标。“个性化品牌可以制造话题,首店热度会更高,能吸引大量年轻客群。”

“跟一个公司谈合作,比跟十个独立品牌谈效率高得多。”张彬直言,这些能够不断孵化新品牌的集团,也是购物中心眼中的“优质合作伙伴”。因为这意味着“安全”,当某个品牌热度下滑,集团可以换牌续租,商场也不用承担空铺风险。

这些“造牌”公司同样需要商场的客流和话题势能。

以朴下隆九为例,创立仅10个月就成为流量中心,离不开核心商圈的标杆商业:去年8月,朴下隆九首店落在上海黄浦区的日月光中心广场,开业即出现大排长龙的场面,借助商场的高流量和曝光将品牌势能拔高,迅速立住了“新晋网红”的身份。

在选择如何继续“复制”时,朴下隆九的打法也很明确:一线城市、省会或强二线城市核心地段高端商圈——广州首店落地天河商圈的天环广场,北京首店落地王府井,江苏首店开在南京高端商场德基广场。大众点评显示,截至目前,朴下隆九共有60+门店,其中约20家入驻华润置地旗下万象系购物中心。

饮之梦、万拾合宜旗下品牌也遵循相似的开店轨迹,即先从发源地开出一两家试点门店模型,再进一线城市的标杆购物中心“炸场”,然后在新一线、省会、强二线城市铺开。

商场给了品牌第一把火,门店排队的照片、话题等又在社交平台迅速加热,叠加亮眼的数据,成了集团向其他城市扩张,拿下下一个优质点位的谈判筹码。

“这种好处是双向的,跟成熟的商业地产合作能更好地建立标准,品牌也熟悉商场的运营规则和租金等,合作起来更高效。”在上海经营餐厅的一位资深餐饮人如此说道。

像万拾合宜和万象系购物中心绑定颇深,旗下不同品牌门店通常都挨着开。在长沙万象城,负一楼就有NEED、野果Yeego和麻布食堂,三家都隔壁相邻;北京三里屯太古里,NEED和野果Yeego也挨在一起。

批量造牌生意更像是品牌与购物中心的“合谋”:商场需要持续不断的新鲜感,这些公司负责不断“造新牌”;新品牌需要客流来放大话题度,高曝光商圈正好提供这种势能。两者一拍即合,推动了这门生意的规模化。

从批量造牌到“餐饮界安踏”,还差多远?

从更大的视野来看,餐饮业的多品牌化并非新鲜事物。

除了万拾合宜、朗行鼎胜、饮之梦等“流量打法”——在购物中心砸出爆店,快速制造话题然后变现。百胜中国、海底捞、九毛九、呷哺呷哺等同样在推行多品牌战略,直接复用能力到其他赛道。像海底捞利用自身的供应链、数智系统和组织能力,在烤肉、炸鸡、汉堡、烘焙、湘菜、川菜等十多个赛道都开出了新品牌。

番茄资本创始人卿永将这一趋势概括为,中国餐饮正在从“单品牌增长”迈向“多品牌工厂化”的新阶段。

企业的核心资产不再是某一个品牌,而是一套能够持续孵化品牌的能力。在这个体系里,品牌更像流水线上的产品,不断被生产、测试和迭代;企业则像一家投资机构,通过同时布局多个赛道来提高成功概率。

万拾合宜、饮之梦、朗行鼎胜以及海底捞们所做的尝试,或许只是这一轮变化的开始。

也有业内人士开始期待,进入多品牌工厂化阶段,“餐饮界的安踏”或指日可待。

参考安踏的发展路径,其核心是通过收并购成熟品牌——亚玛芬体育、FILA、迪桑特、可隆等——再纳入集团化的矩阵运营,满足不同消费层级和场景的需求。换句话说,安踏买的从来不是一个“流量入口”,而是可以长期持有、持续增值的资产。

眼下这批餐饮公司孵化的,大多是从零开始的新品牌,仍处于验证阶段。据红餐网不完全统计,海底捞自“红石榴计划”推行以来,陆续推出了近20个品牌。但截至目前,大多数品牌仍处于探索试水阶段,门店规模在数家至数十家不等。像小嗨炸鸡、苗师兄等品牌定位几经转变,而嗨妮牛肉麻辣烫已经关店歇业了。

从“造出品牌”到“沉淀资产”,中间仍然隔着一道漫长的验证周期。

对于万拾合宜、朗行鼎胜们而言,真正的考题或许并不是下一个网红品牌什么时候出现、是否能不断复制爆店神话,而是当商场流量红利再度消退、首店光环消失,这些推出的品牌如何持续吸引顾客?

注:文/红餐编辑部,文章来源:红餐网(公众号ID:hongcan18),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:红餐网

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0