广告
加载中

麦记牛奶的千店梦:规模是自己的 成本是加盟商的

林泽 2026-06-25 17:51
林泽 2026/06/25 17:51

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章核心披露了连锁新式糖水品牌麦记牛奶的扩张危机,同时梳理了整个新式糖水赛道的发展现状,干货内容如下

1. 核心事件:麦记牛奶被资本接管后,10个月内从53家门店快速扩张至超1000家,当前遭遇加盟商集体维权,实际营收、毛利率、回本周期都远低于品牌宣传,还存在频繁高额罚款、总部扶持缺位等问题

2. 行业整体情况:新式糖水赛道近年爆发式增长,行业规模三年从242亿元涨到621亿元,预计2026年突破780亿元,但赛道竞争已经进入白热化

3. 普通人的入场提醒:新式糖水存在地域差异大、依赖堂食消费频次低、客单价高复购差等天生短板,还有跨界玩家挤压,盲目入场容易亏损,需要谨慎评估

本文披露了麦记牛奶的扩张问题,也梳理了糖水赛道的发展趋势,对糖水品牌经营有多方面参考价值

1. 消费趋势层面:当前71.8%的Z世代愿意为健康养生饮品买单,主打低糖、天然滋补的新式糖水精准匹配需求,行业规模三年翻倍,2025年新增糖水企业3800多家,赛道热度居高不下

2. 经营和产品层面:当前行业同质化问题严重,多数品牌卖点、产品高度雷同,缺乏差异化创新,品牌需要打磨差异化产品,当前行业已经出现糖水+茶饮的融合趋势,可供品牌借鉴

3. 风险警示:麦记激进扩张、把成本转嫁给加盟商引发信任危机,提醒品牌扩张需先跑通单店盈利模型,不能盲目追求规模,同时要应对海底捞、新茶饮等跨界玩家的竞争,提前做好布局

本文披露了糖水加盟赛道的真实情况,点明了赛道的机会与风险,对做糖水生意的卖家有较高参考价值

1. 加盟风险提示:头部品牌麦记牛奶存在宣传与实际不符的问题,品牌宣传七八个月回本、最高70%毛利率,实际多数加盟商回本周期长达一年半以上,实际毛利率仅45%-50%,还存在频繁高额罚款、总部业绩扶持不到位等问题,加盟前需要核实信息

2. 赛道机会:当前糖水赛道仍保持高速增长,预计2026年行业规模突破780亿元,Z世代养生需求持续拉动品类增长,有经验的经营者可以依托超级加盟商模式快速开店

3. 竞争风险:当前赛道已经进入洗牌期,头部品牌加速扩张,还有海底捞、新茶饮等跨界玩家入局,中小卖家面临双重挤压,入场前要充分测算本地需求和前期成本,避免盲目投资

本文梳理了新式糖水行业的发展变化,能给糖水相关生产加工工厂提供多方面参考

1. 产品生产与设计需求:当前新式糖水走向标准化,品牌普遍精简SKU,采用统一基底加标准化小料的模式,对木薯、芋圆、桃胶等标准化食材需求大幅提升,同时消费者偏好低糖、药食同源的滋补食材,工厂可调整研发方向匹配这类需求

2. 商业机会:糖水赛道三年规模翻倍,大量新品牌、新门店进场,跨界的茶饮、火锅品牌也纷纷推出糖水产品,整体市场需求增长明显,工厂可拓展To B供货业务,对接新品牌和跨界玩家

3. 转型启示:当前品牌都在推进规模化、标准化扩张,工厂需要加快数字化升级,提升供应链响应效率,匹配品牌的规模化供货需求,同时可拓展电商渠道,服务更多中小品牌客户

本文清晰展现了新式糖水赛道的发展趋势和各类玩家的痛点,能给服务糖水行业的服务商指明业务方向

1. 行业发展趋势:新式糖水赛道进入爆发期,行业规模三年翻一倍多,2025年新增糖水相关企业3800多家,大量新品牌、超级加盟商入场,跨界玩家也纷纷布局,行业服务需求十分旺盛

2. 核心客户痛点:新品牌快速扩张需要标准化培训、供应链管理、门店运营支持;加盟商面临总部扶持不足、盈利测算不准的问题;中小门店面临获客难、成本高的问题;品牌普遍面临产品同质化、地域需求差异的问题

3. 业务方向:服务商可针对连锁品牌推出标准化运营、合规管理、加盟商培训服务,针对门店推出精准选址、本地流量运营、成本管控服务,还可帮助品牌做差异化产品研发和供应链整合,匹配行业增长需求

本文披露了新式糖水赛道的扩张现状和存在的问题,对布局餐饮业态的平台商有较高参考价值

1. 商家需求:当前糖水品牌加速扩张,多数品牌偏好落地主流商业综合体,麦记80%门店都开在万象、万达等商业综合体内,品牌对优质商圈点位需求旺盛,同时外卖平台是门店重要销售渠道,商家对合理抽成政策需求强烈

2. 招商运营方向:平台可针对性招商糖水头部品牌和潜力新品牌,迎合消费者对养生糖水的需求,丰富平台业态,还可针对超级加盟商推出批量点位合作政策,吸引品牌快速落地

3. 风险规避:部分品牌激进扩张,单店盈利模型未跑通,容易出现大规模闭店,平台合作前要核查品牌单店盈利数据,避免空位损失和口碑影响,同时要合理控制同区域糖水门店密度,避免分流过度影响商家存活率

本文记录了新式糖水赛道的爆发式发展和头部品牌的扩张实践,为餐饮产业研究提供了丰富的案例和数据支撑

1. 产业新动向:新式糖水从地方小吃升级为热门餐饮风口,行业规模三年从242亿元增长至621亿元,预计2026年突破780亿元,行业出现多个新变化:连锁化加速,头部品牌纷纷制定千店级扩张计划,诞生了超级加盟商模式、茶饮化改造糖水、糖水茶饮融合、店中店等新商业模式

2. 行业新问题:头部品牌普遍患上“规模饥渴症”,激进扩张将成本和风险转嫁给加盟商,容易引发信任危机;行业存在同质化严重、品类天生短板突出等问题,叠加跨界玩家降维打击,中小品牌生存空间被大幅压缩,行业已进入洗牌期

3. 研究启示:可进一步研究餐饮风口下规模扩张与盈利的平衡问题,以及连锁加盟模式中品牌方与加盟商的利益分配机制,为餐饮行业连锁化发展提供理论和实践参考

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article reveals the expansion crisis of Maiji Milk, a chain modern sweet soup brand, and outlines the current development status of the entire modern sweet soup industry. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core incident: After Maiji Milk was taken over by capital, it expanded rapidly from 53 stores to over 1,000 within 10 months. Now it is facing collective rights protection from franchisees, as its actual revenue, gross margin and payback period are all far lower than the brand’s promotional claims. It also faces issues such as frequent high fines and lack of support from headquarters.

2. Industry overview: The modern sweet soup industry has experienced explosive growth in recent years, with its market size surging from 242 billion yuan to 621 billion yuan in three years, and it is expected to exceed 780 billion yuan by 2026. However, competition in the track has become increasingly intense.

3. Note for individual entrants: Modern sweet soup has inherent drawbacks including large regional demand differences, low consumption frequency relying on in-store dining, and poor repurchase due to high average customer spend. It also faces competition from cross-industry players. Blind entry easily leads to losses, so careful evaluation is required.

This article discloses the expansion problems of Maiji Milk and sorts out the development trend of the modern sweet soup industry, providing multi-dimensional reference value for sweet soup brand operation:

1. Consumption trend: Currently, 71.8% of Gen Z consumers are willing to pay for healthy, nourishing beverages. Modern sweet soup, which focuses on low sugar and natural nourishment, perfectly matches this demand. The industry has more than doubled in size in three years, with more than 3,800 new sweet soup enterprises established in 2025, keeping the track hot.

2. Operation and product: Severe homogenization is plaguing the industry today. Most brands have highly similar selling points and products and lack differentiated innovation, so brands need to refine differentiated products. The industry has already seen a integration trend of "sweet soup + bubble tea", which brands can learn from.

3. Risk warning: Maiji Milk's aggressive expansion and shifting costs to franchisees triggered a crisis of trust. This reminds brands that they need to validate a profitable unit economics model before expanding at scale, and should not pursue blind growth. Meanwhile, they need to prepare in advance to compete with cross-industry players such as Haidilao and new-style tea brands.

This article discloses the real situation of the franchised modern sweet soup track, points out the opportunities and risks, and provides high reference value for sellers engaged in the sweet soup business:

1. Franchise risk warning: Leading brand Maiji Milk has a mismatch between its promotional promises and actual performance. The brand claims a 7-8 month payback period and a gross margin as high as 70%, but in reality, most franchisees face a payback period of more than 18 months and an actual gross margin of only 45% to 50%. There are also problems such as frequent high fines and insufficient performance support from headquarters, so franchisees need to verify information before joining.

2. Track opportunities: The modern sweet soup industry still maintains rapid growth, and its market size is expected to exceed 780 billion yuan by 2026. The growing health demand of Gen Z continues to drive category growth. Experienced operators can open stores quickly via the super franchisee model.

3. Competitive risk: The track has now entered a consolidation phase. Leading brands are expanding at an accelerated pace, while cross-industry players including Haidilao and new-style tea brands are also entering the market. Small and medium-sized sellers face double pressure. They need to fully calculate local demand and upfront costs before entering the market to avoid blind investment.

This article sorts out the development and changes of the modern sweet soup industry, and provides multiple references for production and processing factories related to sweet soup:

1. Product production and design demand: Modern sweet soup brands are moving toward standardization, generally streamlining SKUs and adopting a model of unified base plus standardized toppings. This has led to a sharp increase in demand for standardized ingredients such as tapioca, taro balls and peach gum. Meanwhile, consumers prefer low-sugar, nourishing ingredients that are both edible and medicinal, so factories can adjust their R&D direction to match this demand.

2. Business opportunities: The sweet soup industry has more than doubled in size in three years, with a large number of new brands and new stores entering the market, and cross-industry players including tea and hot pot brands are also launching their own sweet soup products. Overall market demand has grown significantly, so factories can expand their B2B supply business to serve new brands and cross-industry players.

3. Transformation enlightenment: As brands are pushing forward large-scale, standardized expansion, factories need to accelerate digital upgrading, improve supply chain response efficiency to meet the large-scale supply demand of brands. Meanwhile, they can expand e-commerce channels to serve more small and medium-sized brand clients.

This article clearly shows the development trend of the modern sweet soup track and pain points of various players, and points out business directions for service providers serving the sweet soup industry:

1. Industry development trend: The modern sweet soup track has entered an explosive growth period, with its market size more than doubling in three years. More than 3,800 new sweet soup-related enterprises were established in 2025, with a large number of new brands, super franchisees entering the market and cross-industry players laying out their presence, leading to very strong demand for industry services.

2. Core customer pain points: Fast-expanding new brands need standardized training, supply chain management and in-store operation support; franchisees face insufficient headquarter support and inaccurate profit forecasting; small and medium-sized stores struggle with customer acquisition and high operating costs; and brands generally face the challenges of product homogenization and varied regional demand.

3. Business directions: Service providers can launch standardized operation, compliance management and franchisee training services for chain brands; launch precise site selection, local traffic operation and cost control services for independent stores; they can also help brands develop differentiated products and integrate supply chains to match the growing demand of the industry.

This article discloses the current expansion status and existing problems of the modern sweet soup track, and provides high reference value for platform operators laying out the catering business:

1. Merchant demand: Sweet soup brands are expanding rapidly, and most prefer to open stores in mainstream commercial complexes. 80% of Maiji Milk's stores are located in complexes such as Mixc and Wanda, so brands have strong demand for high-quality commercial space. Meanwhile, food delivery platforms are important sales channels for stores, so merchants have strong demand for reasonable commission policies.

2. Investment and operation direction: Platforms can attract leading sweet soup brands and promising new brands to meet consumers' demand for healthy nourishing sweet soup and enrich their business format. They can also launch bulk location cooperation policies for super franchisees to attract brands to settle in quickly.

3. Risk avoidance: Some brands expand aggressively without validating a profitable unit economics model, making large-scale store closure highly likely. Platforms need to verify brands' single-store profitability data before cooperation to avoid vacant space losses and reputational damage. Meanwhile, they should reasonably control the density of sweet soup stores in the same region to avoid excessive customer cannibalization that hurts merchant survival rates.

This article records the explosive growth of the modern sweet soup track and the expansion practice of leading brands, providing rich case and data support for catering industry research:

1. New industry trends: Modern sweet soup has upgraded from a local snack to a popular catering track, with its market size growing from 242 billion yuan to 621 billion yuan in three years, and is expected to exceed 780 billion yuan by 2026. Multiple new changes have emerged in the industry: chain expansion is accelerating, with leading brands one after another rolling out 1,000-store expansion plans; new business models have emerged, including the super franchisee model, tea-infused transformation of sweet soup, sweet soup-tea integration, and in-store store concepts.

2. New industry problems: Leading brands generally suffer from "size hunger", shifting costs and risks to franchisees through aggressive expansion, which easily triggers trust crises. The industry also faces problems such as severe homogenization and prominent inherent category flaws. Combined with the disruptive competition from cross-industry players, the living space of small and medium-sized brands has been greatly compressed, and the industry has entered a consolidation phase.

3. Research enlightenment: Further research can be conducted on the balance between scale expansion and profitability amid catering booms, as well as the benefit distribution mechanism between brand owners and franchisees in the chain franchise model, to provide theoretical and practical reference for the chain development of the catering industry.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

所谓的行业标杆内里没那么硬,糖水生意也没想的那么好做。

作者 | 林泽

编辑 | 杜仲

来源 | 观潮新消费(ID:TideSight)

近日,连锁新式糖水品牌麦记牛奶遭遇品牌成立以来最严重的信任危机。

先是“品牌团队跑路”的传闻四起,后有总部对加盟商设立罚款KPI的内部管理争议,外界对其高速扩张模式的质疑愈演愈烈。

矛盾的导火索,来自2026年6月初多位品牌加盟商在社交平台的集中“喊冤”,他们的控诉直指几个核心落差:

营收不及预期:月租两万的商场门店日均销售额仅1000元,多次向总部寻求业绩扶持无果;

毛利大幅缩水:加盟时许诺的最高70%毛利率,实际运营只能维持在45%-50%;

罚款名目繁多:总部对卫生、产品品质的合规要求极为严格,每月换着法罚钱,单次罚款动辄上千,被加盟商戏称为变相创收。

面对加盟商的集体指控,麦记牛奶官方迅速否认倒闭传闻,强调品牌当前正常运营、加盟通道持续开放,并解释日均销售额高低取决于门店选址及客流,合规罚款也是为了守住食品安全底线。

这场闹剧揭开了麦记牛奶光鲜表象下的管理落差,也折射出品牌当下最真实的经营现状:“所谓的行业标杆内里没那么硬,糖水生意也没想的那么好做”。

能否持续盈利,依旧是个谜

麦记牛奶在易主之后,迅速驶入扩张的快车道。

2021年,钱潜和徐康夫妇在浙江湖州开出第一家麦记牛奶门店,此后几年,品牌重心放在产品打磨和单店盈利模型探索上,知名度与体量均有限,2024年全国门店仅拓展至50多家。

转折发生在2025年。职业餐饮投资人谢永亮带团队全面接管麦记,凭借深厚的连锁加盟经验对品牌进行标准化、规模化改造,不到10个月便将门店从53家增至1000家,覆盖全国31个省份,体量远超鲜芋仙、满记甜品等行业老大哥。

谢永亮的扩张思路很粗暴:“抛弃传统糖水地域化的旧方法论,追求极致效率”。

产品端,麦记去掉地方化特色,用普适性极强的牛奶做统一基底,搭配木薯、芋圆、桃胶等几种标准小料,消费者无需理解复杂的糖水文化,点单门槛被大幅拉低,菜单设计也非常克制,产品SKU已精简至20余个。

这套标准的出餐公式,让操作流程变得简单固定,培训成本和上手难度下降,产品库存与损耗更可控。

加盟的打法同样生猛。麦记没有单独设立招商部,而是直接拿着“七八个月回本、单店日均营业额过万”等业绩,定向吸引有糖水、茶饮经营经验的超级加盟商,这批入局者资金雄厚、运营老道,平均每人能开出2-10家门店,赚钱能力远超餐饮小白。

区域布局上,麦记锚定经济发达地区,超过七成门店落地一线、新一线和二线城市;选址策略也从街边转向高人流场所,80%的门店开进华润万象系、万达广场、吾悦广场、龙湖天街等主流商业综合体,获客门槛降低、盈利更有保障。

高度可复制的经营标准,叠加能力出众的超级加盟商矩阵,这明显是在用“茶饮思维”重新做一遍糖水生意,把茶饮的活法套到糖水身上,效果如何?

谢永亮受访时表示,改造前麦记大多数门店GMV仅有十几万,少数能做到20-30万,引入成熟科学的茶饮管理体系后,运营成本得到优化,旺季门店GMV超过30万。

谢永亮口中的GMV数据固然亮眼,可单店交易额的提升并不代表门店盈利能力也变强了,品牌的经营风险依旧存在。

最棘手的是回本问题。麦记宣传的“近一年回本”在现实中并不容易达成,很多加盟商反馈门店回本周期长达一年半甚至更久。这其实不难理解,麦记的产品客单价在20至35元,根本没9块9的奶茶那么好卖,而且单店前期投入高达60-70万元,在高成本、低频消费的经营模型下,留给加盟商的安全边际实在不宽裕。

更值得审视的,是麦记过分激进的拓店节奏。过去一年,国内有相当一部分门店仍挣扎在盈亏平衡线附近,盈利模型尚未完全跑通,谢永亮却将资源投向海外市场,在美国洛杉矶开店并计划扩张至加拿大、澳洲等地,以此提升品牌的全球影响力。

根基未稳时便分散精力与资金,麦记的经营重心已从“打磨单店盈利”滑向“虚无的资本叙事”,即便扛着管理半径拉长的压力和加盟商的多番抱怨,扩张步伐也未曾停下,截至目前门店数量已突破1050家。

谢永亮如此心急,一方面是想抓住品类风口,另一方面则源于对市场周期的恐慌。他明确提出2025年是糖水赛道“唯一窗口期”,抢占先机就有概率成为赢家。

此前麦记手中的筹码有限,既无具体表现盈利优势的指标,品牌声量也谈不上多高,增大自身体量几乎是当时唯一能快速完成的目标,于是选择在短短数月内插旗全国,增强品牌的存在感。

这条路确实是抢占市场心智最直接的策略,千店规模带来的品牌曝光和加盟商关注,远非几十家店可比,但餐饮行业从来不是谁跑得快谁就能活到最后,真正决定品牌生死的是门店赚不赚钱。

麦记的规模还不足以构成护城河,如果无法找到可持续的盈利模型,眼下的千店声势,最终可能只是昙花一现。

谢永亮的躁动性扩张,映射出糖水赛道对风口的集体焦虑。自 2025 年行业突然爆发以来,从网红新品牌到初代老玩家,大多都患上了“规模饥渴症”,唯恐在格局固化前被甩出牌桌,一场新的卡位战已然打响。

糖水生意爆发品牌各有算盘

新中式糖水正被餐饮大盘快速抬咖,从一门偏安岭南的传统小吃,变成资本和加盟商争相涌入的热门赛道。

2022年-2025年,糖水行业规模从242亿元涨到621亿元,三年翻了一倍有余,预计2026年将突破780亿元大关。这增速,放眼整个餐饮界都不多见。

市场体量一路狂飙背后,无数人挤破头进场分羹。天眼查数据披露,近五年新增糖水相关企业超9000家,占行业总量约六成,仅2025年就新增了3800多家。

糖水成了人人哄抢的香饽饽,街头巷尾的糖水招牌一夜之间多了起来,眼见市场蛋糕被各路人马分食,头部玩家开始急了。

糖水新势力的动作最积极。赵记传承凭借非遗姜撞奶和广式糖水突围,这个2015年成立于广东江门的品牌,先后获得乐百氏、喜茶的投资,就近两年新开门店超500家,扩张步伐明显加快,招牌产品“非遗手冲姜撞奶”一年卖出1500万碗。

2022年从江西起家的糖叙,以“糖水+快餐”模式迅速在下沉市场站稳脚跟,门店总数已突破400家,其中2025年新开店面约占九成,品牌创始人廖伟灿透露,在营单店日均营收达7000元,最高达2万元以上。

主打炖燕窝、女性滋养热饮的宫小燕,2026年重点发力一线城市,同时将建店成本从10万元降至7.5万元,以“中央厨房+现制现炖”模式打磨单店盈利,全国体量已达到700家。

新锐品牌来势汹汹,传统老牌也没闲着。满记甜品聚焦年轻化转型,把产品延伸至烘焙点心,同步发力新零售,将双皮奶、杨枝甘露等经典款铺进盒马、山姆等终端。2025年底,满记在成立30周年之际放出规划:“未来3至5年实现直营门店500家、加盟店规模破2000家、加盟业务净营收目标敲定在10亿元”。

被DQ在华操盘手CFB集团收购后的鲜芋仙也亮出了野心,计划2026年完成现有店面的焕新改造,2027年起全面加速拓店,2030年在国内开出2000多家店。

糖水赛道在短时间内涌入大量玩家、逼得头部集体焦虑,这都是供需两端合力推动的结果。

需求端,无数年轻消费者的健康、养生诉求正被精准承接。知萌咨询做过一项消费调研,发现71.8%的Z世代愿意为健康饮品或中式调理买单,糖水品牌敏锐捕捉到这一变化,跳出传统高糖、高热量的舒适圈,引入银耳、桃胶、陈皮、白莲子等“药食同源”食材,以“低糖”“天然食材”“滋补养生”为核心卖点,将“吃糖水”重新定义为“进补”。

供给端,高利润是最大的驱动力。糖水品类毛利率约65%,比新茶饮高出10个百分点,叠加制作流程相对标准化、供应链成熟可控,大量有资源的超级加盟商和资本顺势入局。此外,新茶饮的存量竞争,也让资本市场的目光投向糖水铺。

供需两端一同发力,给行业爆发提供了充足弹药,糖水生意就这样成了餐饮界的新风口,中式糖水在社交媒体的热度愈发高涨。

抖音关于糖水的话题播放量68.9亿次,小红书相关话题浏览量超15亿次,这个传统品类摇身一变成为网络世界的新晋顶流,糖水与茶饮的核心客群重叠度高达70%以上,原本属于新茶饮的流量和消费力也不断被分流。

这股热潮能持续多久?当所有品牌都在做类似的产品、讲相同的故事,真正的难题才浮出水面。

新式糖水是风口

但生意没那么好做

糖水品牌要实现长红,关键在于完成从“休闲”到“新刚需”的定位跃迁。

这个过程注定是漫长的,新茶饮能成为全民热销品,得益于便捷、解渴、提神和社交等复合属性加持,消费场景和用户基础都甩出糖水铺一大截,后者的短板太明显。

具体来看,糖水铺的问题主要集中在三个方面:

一是地域需求存在差异。糖水起源于岭南,根植于广府“药食同源”的养生哲学,广东一省就占全国糖水市场近三成,而华北、东北门店密度较低。整体来看,南方市场成熟、而北方消费习惯弱、冬季需求偏低,教育周期更长。以麦记牛奶黑龙江的某个门店为参考,其日营业额连300元都难突破。

二是产品形态和消费场景天生吃亏。糖水需要碗勺等餐具、高度依赖堂食,无法像“即买即走”的茶饮那样无缝融入逛街、通勤等动态场景。加上糯米、芋头、豆沙等原料饱腹感强,很难像奶茶那样一天喝上好几杯。这种非刚需的品类基因,直接压制了消费频次的提升空间。

三是价格定位偏高,利润却未必更厚。糖水客单价普遍在20至35元,高于茶饮10至20元的主流价格带,但高价并不等于高利润。某糖水铺老板算过一笔账:“线下日均客流仅20人,日销约360元,线上也不赚钱,一份20元外卖,平台抽成到手仅8元,食材成本就要9元,卖一单亏一单”。高客单价没有带来高复购,反而成了高频消费的绊脚石。

比先天短板更麻烦的,是行业内部的同质化内耗。多数糖水铺的核心卖点高度雷同,“手工现做”“新鲜食材”“新中式风格”“古法熬制”等招牌几乎是标配,品类也极其相似,木薯大满贯、桃胶炖奶等产品高频重复,缺乏真正有颠覆性的创新。

而且糖水的制作门槛低,极易被其他赛道玩家复刻。

2025年,海底捞在上海首次尝试“糖水铺”店中店,主打“每日鲜作”,产品定价9.9至20元,意图将场景延伸至非正餐时段与火锅主业形成互补;楠火锅、朱光玉等品牌也早已将甜品作为流量密码,推出芒果冰山、红丝绒芝士牛乳冰等品类。

新茶饮也嗅到了糖水的流量红利。古茗、茶百道、CoCo等在菜单增设糖水单品;茶颜悦色旗下的“酥山糖水铺子”店中店已覆盖超500家门店;茶理宜世直接孵化子品牌“RUXU入续鸳鸯糖水铺”,已进驻成都太古里、上海长宁来福士等高端购物中心。

跨界玩家抢生意的举动,逼得糖水正规军开始反攻,一边加速拓店巩固阵地、一边做起奶茶生意,以抵御外部冲击。

麦记牛奶上线了鲜牛乳茶、手打柠檬茶等茶饮产品,目前茶饮品类已贡献20%的销售份额;满记甜品将双皮奶、杨枝甘露等升级为杯装、可吸食的饮品形态,“糖水+奶茶”的双向融合加速上演。

茶饮业万店已成常态,糖水赛道因品类基因限制难以复制这样的战绩。随着茶颜悦色、海底捞等用店中店方式进入市场,糖水与奶茶的边界逐渐模糊。供需平衡被打破,行业彻底进入洗牌期。

这对头部来说不致命,但对体量小的糖水铺而言是双重挤压。巨头依托供应链和品牌势能加速拓店,用规模化摊薄成本、以品牌力虹吸客流。而中小品牌既要应对同质化内卷,还面临头部和跨界玩家的降维打击,生存空间被大幅压缩。

有分析指出,糖水赛道经历着冰火两重天:“连锁品牌加速扩张,无数的独立糖水铺却在生死线上挣扎”。

商场的糖水店越开越密,客流越摊越薄,赚钱压力随之增长,眼下的糖水江湖,早已不是“摆个摊就能数钱”的草莽时代了。

注:文/林泽,文章来源:观潮新消费(公众号ID:TideSight),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:观潮新消费

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0