广告
加载中

今年618 迎来AI购物“大乱斗”

惊蛰研究所消费组 2026-06-09 13:07
惊蛰研究所消费组 2026/06/09 13:07

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

今年618各大主流平台集体布局AI购物,行业释放信号2026年将迎来AI电商时代,以下是普通用户体验AI购物的核心干货:

1. 当前主流AI购物工具各有特点:千问推荐风格活泼,会整理快速选购表格,主动追问用户细化需求;豆包推荐客观理性,会主动说明商品优缺点,站在用户角度梳理需求,辅助决策;京东AI购推荐商品数量多,但分类逻辑混乱,精准度不足,也不会进一步引导用户明确需求。

2. 实操技巧:使用AI购物时可先提出大致需求,再根据AI的追问细化需求,能获得更精准的推荐;哪怕咨询非购物类问题,比如徒步攻略,AI也能主动挖掘对应的购物需求,提供一站式参考。同时要注意,当前AI购物还存在无法实时比价、信源准确度参差不齐、可能存在竞价广告陷阱等问题,需要注意甄别。

AI电商即将在2026年迎来全面发展期,为品牌运营带来了全新的变化和机会,核心干货总结如下:

1. 行业消费与竞争趋势变化:电商已经从传统货架电商、内容兴趣电商逐步转向对话式AI电商,用户购物逻辑从被动种草、低价吸引转向主动梳理需求、寻找匹配自身需求的商品,过去“唯价格论”的竞争逻辑被打破,品牌竞争的核心转向产品品质。

2. 新渠道机会:目前各大AI工具已经打通主流电商渠道,豆包即将为抖音商城引流,千问全面打通淘宝,京东、小红书也完成了AI购物的布局,品牌可以提前对接各大AI渠道抢占占位。

3. 运营方向调整:AI推荐的核心依据是真实用户的产品反馈,品牌需要沉淀足够多的真实产品体验内容,同时聚焦产品品质提升,才能获得AI的推荐权重,获得更多流量。

AI电商即将成为电商行业新的增长赛道,给卖家带来了新的机会和需要警惕的风险,核心干货总结如下:

1. 新机会:AI电商的种草由用户主动发起,AI通过对话挖掘用户场景化潜在需求,转化效率比传统被动种草更高,新的竞争逻辑下,不再单纯靠低价抢占流量,只要产品品质过硬,中小卖家也有机会获得AI推荐,获取新流量。目前各大平台都在布局AI电商,提前入场就能抢占早期红利。

2. 需要注意的风险:AI推荐依赖真实的用户评价信源,虚假宣传会导致AI推荐出错,影响用户体验;AI目前存在天然的平台信息壁垒,无法实现跨平台实时比价,同时可能出现竞价排名推荐的陷阱。

3. 应对方向:卖家需要做好真实产品内容沉淀,聚焦产品品质提升,主动适配AI推荐的规则,提前对接各大平台的AI渠道。

AI电商时代的到来,给工厂的生产设计、数字化转型带来了新的启示和商业机会,核心干货总结如下:

1. 产品生产设计的新方向:AI电商可以精准梳理聚合用户的真实需求,把不同场景下的碎片化需求传递给供给端,工厂可以通过AI获取更精准的需求数据,反过来指导产品研发设计,还可以根据AI挖掘的场景化组合需求,开发套装类产品,匹配用户一站式购物需要。

2. 商业机会:当前各大平台都在完善AI电商生态,提前布局对接平台的AI推荐体系,就能获得早期的流量倾斜,开拓全新的销路,获得更多订单。

3. 数字化转型启示:AI电商的竞争核心是产品品质,工厂不需要再靠压缩利润打价格战,可以把更多精力投入到产品品质提升上;同时需要推进数字化建设,沉淀产品的真实信息和用户评价,方便AI抓取推荐,更好适配新的生态。

AI电商已经成为电商行业明确的发展方向,行业变化给服务商带来了新的需求和机会,核心干货总结如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:电商业态正式从搜索式电商转向对话式AI电商,AI电商的核心支柱是内容厚度和商品广度,未来行业对AI能力建设、真实内容沉淀、适配AI推荐的运营服务需求会大幅增长,市场空间广阔。

2. 当前行业的核心客户痛点:目前AI电商发展还存在多个明显痛点,一是平台间的竞争带来天然信息壁垒,AI暂时无法实现跨平台实时比价;二是AI推荐内容的准确度高度依赖信源的时效性和真实性,很多商家缺乏足够的优质信源沉淀;三是AI推荐可能变成新的竞价广告陷阱,影响用户信任也影响商家口碑。

3. 服务商的机会:可以针对性开发解决方案,比如帮助商家沉淀真实用户体验内容,优化AI推荐的信源质量;帮助商家搭建适配AI对话推荐的商品信息体系,抓住AI电商的流量红利。

AI电商即将成为电商平台新的核心竞争力,各大平台已经开启布局,总结当前实践的核心干货如下:

1. AI购物的产品定位思路选择:目前行业有两种不同的产品思路,一种是千问、豆包走的对话梳理需求思路,先通过对话明确用户真实需求再推荐,推荐精准度高,用户体验好;另一种是京东AI购走的传统货架思路,只是把搜索框换成对话框,推荐商品多但精准度不足,用户体验差,新产品布局建议参考前者。

2. 做好AI电商需要的基础条件:一是要提升AI的自然语言理解和逻辑推理能力,二是要积累足够丰富的真实用户产品反馈作为信源,两者缺一不可。

3. 需要规避的风险:要尽快解决当前AI存在的推荐信息不精准、无法实时比价、竞价广告陷阱等问题,避免消耗用户信任;同时要调整平台运营逻辑,从靠低价活动拉增长转向靠精准匹配需求实现长期发展,规避恶性价格竞争的风向,推动行业良性发展。

当前电商业态正迎来新一轮迭代,AI电商作为全新业态已经进入落地测试阶段,呈现出很多值得研究的新动向和新问题,核心干货总结如下:

1. 产业新动向:2024年618各大平台集体布局AI购物,行业明确释放信号,预计2026年将正式迎来AI电商时代;电商业态迭代路径从传统货架电商、兴趣内容电商转向对话式AI电商,行业核心逻辑从靠低价流量拉动增长转向精准匹配用户真实需求,破解了过去十几年“唯价格论”的竞争怪圈,推动行业走向良性发展。

2. 新商业模式:AI电商把传统搜索式购物转为对话式购物,AI承担专业买手的角色,能够从非交易对话中挖掘用户的场景化潜在需求,完成主动种草转化,形成了“用户发起对话-AI梳理需求-精准推荐-跳转转化”的全新商业模式。

3. 现存新问题:当前AI电商还存在平台信息壁垒、推荐内容准确度依赖信源质量、可能催生新的竞价广告陷阱等问题,这些问题都值得进一步研究探索解决方案。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

During this year's 618 mid-year shopping festival, all major Chinese e-commerce platforms rolled out AI-powered shopping features, and the industry has signaled that the AI e-commerce era will arrive by 2026. Below is key practical takeaways for general consumers:

1. Leading AI shopping tools each have distinct characteristics: Qianwen generates lively, conversational recommendations, organizes quick comparison tables for shoppers, and actively follows up to refine user requirements. Doubao offers objective, rational suggestions, explicitly notes product pros and cons, frames analysis from the user's perspective, and supports more informed decision-making. JD AI Shopping generates a larger volume of product recommendations, but suffers from muddled category logic, low recommendation accuracy, and lacks follow-up to clarify user needs.

2. Practical tips: To get more accurate recommendations, start by stating your general needs, then refine your requirements based on the AI's follow-up questions. Even when you ask non-shopping questions such as hiking guides, AI can proactively identify related shopping needs and provide one-stop reference. Consumers should note that current AI shopping tools still cannot compare prices across platforms in real time, have inconsistent information accuracy, and may contain biased recommendations driven by bidding ads, so results require careful vetting.

AI e-commerce is expected to enter a period of broad adoption by 2026, bringing transformative changes and new opportunities for brand operations. Key takeaways for brands are summarized below:

1. Shifts in consumer behavior and competitive dynamics: E-commerce is gradually evolving from traditional shelf-based models and content-driven interest-based commerce to conversational AI e-commerce. User shopping logic has shifted from passive discovery and price-driven purchases to active demand clarification and product matching. The old "price-first" competition logic is being upended, and product quality has become the core of brand competition.

2. New channel opportunities: Major AI tools have already partnered with leading e-commerce platforms. Doubao will soon drive traffic to Douyin Mall, while Qianwen is fully integrated with Taobao. JD and Xiaohongshu have also completed their AI shopping layouts. Brands can secure early positioning by partnering with these AI channels ahead of mass adoption.

3. Adjustments to operational strategy: AI recommendations are primarily based on real user product feedback. To gain higher recommendation weight and more traffic from AI systems, brands need to accumulate a large volume of authentic product experience content and focus on improving product quality.

AI e-commerce is emerging as a new high-growth track for the industry, bringing new opportunities as well as risks that sellers need to navigate. Key takeaways for sellers are summarized below:

1. New opportunities: In AI e-commerce, product discovery is initiated by users, with AI uncovering scenario-based latent demand through conversation. This delivers higher conversion efficiency than traditional passive product discovery. Under the new competitive framework, traffic is no longer won purely through low pricing—small and medium-sized sellers with high-quality products can also earn AI recommendations and access new sources of traffic. All major platforms are currently building out AI e-commerce ecosystems, so early entry allows sellers to capture first-mover advantages.

2. Key risks to watch: AI recommendations rely on authentic user review data, so false promotional claims will lead to incorrect AI recommendations and damage user experience. AI also faces inherent platform information walls that prevent real-time cross-platform price comparison, and there is risk of biased recommendations driven by bidding ranking traps.

3. Recommended actions: Sellers should accumulate authentic product content, focus on improving product quality, proactively adapt to AI recommendation rules, and partner with major platforms' AI channels in advance.

The arrival of the AI e-commerce era brings new insights and business opportunities for factories' product development, design and digital transformation. Key takeaways for factories are summarized below:

1. New direction for product development and design: AI e-commerce can accurately aggregate and organize real user demand, and pass fragmented demand from different use scenarios to the supply side. Factories can leverage AI to access more accurate demand data to guide R&D and design. AI can also uncover scenario-based combined demand, enabling factories to develop bundled product sets that meet users' one-stop shopping needs.

2. Business opportunities: All major platforms are currently improving their AI e-commerce ecosystems. Factories that connect to platforms' AI recommendation systems early can benefit from preferential early-stage traffic allocation, open up entirely new sales channels, and secure more orders.

3. Insights for digital transformation: The core of competition in AI e-commerce is product quality. Factories no longer need to compete on price by compressing margins, and can instead redirect more resources to improving product quality. They also need to advance digital infrastructure to organize authentic product information and user reviews that can be crawled by AI for recommendations, to better adapt to the new ecosystem.

AI e-commerce has become a clear development direction for the e-commerce industry, and industry changes have created new demand and opportunities for service providers. Key takeaways are summarized below:

1. Industry development trends: E-commerce has officially shifted from search-based commerce to conversational AI e-commerce. The core pillars of AI e-commerce are depth of content and breadth of product selection. Going forward, industry demand for AI capability building, authentic content accumulation, and AI recommendation-aligned operational services will grow substantially, creating vast market opportunities.

2. Core pain points for current clients: AI e-commerce still faces several clear pain points in its early stage. First, inter-platform competition has created natural information silos, and AI cannot currently deliver real-time cross-platform price comparison. Second, the accuracy of AI recommendations heavily depends on the timeliness and authenticity of source data, and many merchants lack sufficient accumulated high-quality source content. Third, AI recommendations can become a new form of biased bidding ad trap, damaging user trust and merchant reputation.

3. Opportunities for service providers: Service providers can develop targeted solutions to these pain points, for example helping merchants accumulate authentic user experience content to improve the quality of source data for AI recommendations, and helping merchants build product information systems adapted for AI conversational recommendations, to capture the traffic opportunities of AI e-commerce.

AI e-commerce is set to become the new core competitive advantage for e-commerce platforms, and major players have already started rolling out their offerings. Below is a summary of key takeaways from current industry practices:

1. Product positioning strategy options: The industry currently follows two distinct product approaches. The first, adopted by Qianwen and Doubao, uses conversation to clarify user demand: it identifies users' real needs through conversation before making recommendations, delivering higher accuracy and better user experience. The second, used by JD AI Shopping, retains the traditional shelf-based model, only replacing the search bar with a chat box; it delivers more product options but suffers from low accuracy and poor user experience. New AI layouts are advised to follow the first approach.

2. Core requirements for building successful AI e-commerce: First, platforms need to improve AI's natural language understanding and logical reasoning capabilities. Second, they need to accumulate a sufficiently large library of real user product feedback to use as source data. Both are indispensable.

3. Risks to avoid: Platforms need to quickly resolve current issues including inaccurate recommendations, lack of real-time price comparison, and bidding recommendation traps, to avoid eroding user trust. They also need to adjust platform operational logic, shifting from growth driven by discount promotions to long-term growth built on accurate demand matching, avoid the risk of vicious price competition, and drive healthy industry development.

The e-commerce industry is currently undergoing a new round of iteration. As an entirely new business paradigm, AI e-commerce has entered the piloting and testing phase, and presents many new developments and issues worth studying. Key takeaways for researchers are summarized below:

1. New industry developments: During the 2024 618 shopping festival, all major platforms collectively rolled out AI shopping features, sending a clear industry signal that the AI e-commerce era will officially arrive around 2026. The iteration path of e-commerce has shifted from traditional shelf commerce and interest-based content commerce to conversational AI e-commerce. The core industry logic has shifted from growth driven by low-cost traffic to accurate matching of real user demand. This breaks the "price-first" competitive cycle that has persisted for more than a decade, and drives the industry toward healthy development.

2. New business model: AI e-commerce transforms traditional search-based shopping into conversational shopping, with AI taking on the role of a professional personal buyer. It can uncover users' scenario-based latent demand from non-transactional conversations and complete active discovery and conversion, forming an entirely new business model: user initiates conversation → AI clarifies demand → accurate recommendation → redirect to conversion.

3. Existing open issues: AI e-commerce currently still faces challenges including inter-platform information silos, recommendation accuracy that relies heavily on source data quality, and the potential for new bidding-based recommendation traps. All of these issues warrant further research to explore solutions.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

作者|成昱

今年的618大促已然拉开帷幕,但电商平台们似乎正在购物场景之外,开启一个新的“战场”。

6月1日,36氪援引知情人士消息报道,豆包预计将在6月下旬正式上线付费内容,若进展顺利,豆包还将于三季度进一步结合电商功能更新完善付费场景,并通过补贴为抖音商城进行引流,四季度进入运行期。此前,豆包已于4月在APP导航栏内嵌“豆包帮你选”功能,用户可在豆包APP中直接体验商品选购、下单支付、订单管理和售后等核心网购功能。

无独有偶,5月11日,千问宣布与淘宝全面打通,用户在千问APP内与AI对话,即可完成淘宝上的商品挑选和下单购买。更早之前,京东在去年12月底推出独立APP“京东AI购”并正式开启内测。包括电商属性最弱的小红书,也在今年4月底宣布成立AI一级部门Dots。

如此默契的集体行为,已经不能单纯用“积极布局AI”来概括。相反,各大平台的行为已经释放出一个清晰的信号:在2026年,属于AI电商的时代正在到来。

AI电商能干啥?

提到AI电商,大多数消费者的脑海里或许并没有一个具体的概念。但其实在2014年,亚马逊公司推出的智能音箱产品Amazon Echo,就通过内置人工智能语音助手Alexa的方式,让用户可以用语音交互的方式完成下单。后来,阿里也在2017年推出了同样利用AI语音交互实现网络购物的天猫精灵等智能硬件产品。

不过从技术层面来说,当时对AI的应用只是在交互方式上完成了创新,在影响消费者购买决策方面的作用并不明显。但随着AI话题热度的持续,普通用户对AI的认知和使用频率逐渐提高,AI在电商场景的落地方式也变得更加具象。眼下,千问、豆包变身“AI购物助手”,就是将AI接入电商场景的一种主要形态。

惊蛰研究所在对比不同AI应用的“AI购物”体验时发现,千问和豆包的应用页面并没有因为接入了电商功能而产生明显变化——公开信息显示,此前豆包导航栏曾出现“豆包帮你选”的按钮,但目前这一按钮已经从导航栏移除。

与之相反,京东AI购APP则是主动分出了“对话”和“爱购”两个功能页,其中“爱购”页面的内容主要为商品推荐——更形象地说,像是把京东APP首页搬了过来。“对话”页面除了与千问、豆包一样,保留了自然对话输入框,还在导航栏放置了“奶茶特价”“找优惠”“AI试穿”等明显引导购物行为的功能按钮。这种设计语言,也给人一种迫切想要用户下单的强烈目标感。

回到对话场景。惊蛰研究所为了对比不同平台的AI购物体验,分别向千问、豆包和京东AI购发送了“为我推荐一款500元以内的耳夹式耳机”的消息,AI助手们回复的内容也各有差别。

千问的“语气”有点像一位兼具网感和活力的导购,会从性价比、大牌背书、音质三个方面分别给到一款推荐商品,然后给到推荐理由,最后还将推荐内容简化整理成一份“快速选购建议”的表格供用户参考。

豆包则是按照“百元入门首选”(性价比)、音质和功能体验三个角度,分别给到一款推荐商品。与千问不同的是,豆包的回答中会列明商品的亮点和不足,语气也显得更为客观、理性。在最后,豆包也会站在消费者视角提炼购买需求,再次强调每款商品的推荐理由,辅助用户消费决策。

京东AI购给到的推荐分类和推荐商品都是最多的,其中分类有5种,推荐商品数量达到了15款。但是分类中除了“性价比”外,其余维度仍然集中在“无感舒适佩戴”“运动防汗”“高清通话降噪”“超长续航”等功能性诉求上,且每个推荐分类都包含3款推荐商品。

另外还有一个细节:千问在对话最后会主动询问用户“更看重音质、续航还是价格?”,并且表示可以帮助进一步选定商品。豆包则是对话结尾询问用户“是否对某款耳机的佩戴舒适度、具体音质风格或使用场景有更详细的疑问?”,同时表示可以进行解答。而京东AI购在给出推荐商品后,没有给到更多分析。

表面上看,三个平台会出现两种不同回复风格,可能是AI能力导致的内容差异,但背后反映的其实是不同平台对“AI购物”这一功能定位的理解差异。

AI与“场景化购物”时代

惊蛰研究所在实际体验中发现,或许是因为千问和豆包在接入电商功能之前,是适用于多场景的AI智能助手,因此产品属性决定了千问和豆包习惯通过对话分析和判断用户的实际需求,然后给出解决方案,同时再根据用户反馈不断修正“答案”。而京东AI购更像是专门为了促成交易而开发的AI助手,把用户的聊天框等价于电商平台的搜索框,然后从用户的对话中提取关键词、匹配商品。

为了验证AI能否进一步理解用户需求、准确推荐商品,惊蛰研究所继续追问“能否推荐几款音质好的耳机”。结果显示,千问基于上一轮对话中的性价比、大牌背书、音质三个维度,按照音质TOP1、性价比音质王、大牌稳妥之选三个细分维度,给出新的推荐商品。

豆包则是聚焦音质维度,从百元音质卷王、空间音效进阶、杜比音效旗舰三个细分维度,给到新的商品推荐。并且豆包和千问在给到推荐商品时,都不同程度地从原理、功能方面进行了产品讲解,其中豆包仍然会提醒用户产品的不足之处。

另一边,京东AI购按照“音质”给到的推荐分类仍然达到了5种,商品数量依旧多达15款。但惊蛰研究所仔细观察发现,来自同一个店铺的漫步者Comfo Clip Q耳夹式耳机,同时出现在了“高性价比音质款”和“骨传导音质款”两个分类中,另外还有来自两家不同店铺的同款moto buds clip耳夹式耳机,出现在“长续航便携款”和“高解析音质款”两个分类中。

惊蛰研究所还注意到,京东AI购在“骨传导音质款”分类推荐中,两款排在最前面的漫步者耳夹式耳机,其商品详情页并未提到该产品具备“骨传导”功能。随后惊蛰研究所询问店铺客服得到的回复,也证实两款耳机的传导方式为“气传导”。

结合三个平台的实际使用体验不难发现,千问和豆包实现“AI购物”的流程思维,是先由用户提出需求,然后通过对话引导用户将需求细化,AI再给到推荐商品以及尽可能丰富的推荐理由。在这个过程中,因为AI在对话中准确理解了用户需求,因此实际给出推荐商品数量虽然不多,但也足够精准。

相反,京东AI购的流程思维似乎不是从了解用户需求出发,而是预设了购买场景,让用户通过输入对话告诉AI“要买什么”,然后给到消费者足够多的选择和筛选条件,但是不直接回答“应该买哪个”“为什么要买”。本质上,这还是传统货架电商的产品思维和运营逻辑。

因此,在千问和豆包身上可以看到,在AI电商场景下,AI的能力首先体现在通过用户对话完成多条件交叉筛选,帮助用户厘清购买需求。其次,在用户购买需求不明确,或对商品缺乏认知时,通过对话中的碎片化信息精准推荐商品,辅助消费决策。

另外,AI电商还有一个最具特色也最有想象力的能力:从非交易属性的对话内容中挖掘场景化需求,给到组合式的商品推荐。这种能力与兴趣电商先通过内容完成种草,再实现转化的生意路径非常相似。不同的是,AI电商的“种草”是由用户主动发起,以AI对话的方式实现的。

例如当一个日常有使用AI助手习惯的用户想要尝试徒步运动,那么他大概率会先了解路线、攻略相关的信息,而AI在给出回答时,完全能够结合徒步运动的户外属性,以tips的方式在对话中主动挖掘徒步鞋、防晒霜、背包、手杖等潜在需求,甚至用户也可能会直接询问AI助手推荐合适的徒步装备。

惊蛰研究所在测试中也发现,针对“能否为我推荐一套徒步装备”这样明确的需求时,千问、豆包以及京东AI购均能给到商品组合。不过,在回答“推荐徒步线路”这种非交易属性的问题时,只有千问和豆包给出了户外徒步的温馨提示,豆包还特别提到在某些特殊路线,需要防滑鞋、登山杖等专业装备。

这种自然对话的种草方式,把挖掘需求的动作变成了对消费者有用的内容,也提升了购物体验。而“对话式购物”也为平台、商家之间的竞争格局带来了新的变数。

AI电商时代,拼什么?

单纯从功能定位来看,AI给出商品推荐,并且说清楚“为什么买”的角色,本质上就是“买手”。而曾经打出“买手电商”这张牌的小红书,在“对话式购物”方面也早有布局。

2024年,小红书推出了一款AI搜索助手点点APP。公开资料显示,点点的产品特点是深度整合小红书站内海量真实笔记与全网生活经验数据,为用户提供美食、旅游、购物、出行等生活场景的查询、解答与规划服务。目前点点的产品功能已经深度融入小红书主站内容生态,用户在搜索框输入问题时,结果页就会出现AI总结的内容。进一步点击页面,就会进入“问一问”的对话界面。

惊蛰研究所注意到,对比AI助手回答问题时对种草信息的相对克制,小红书“问一问”回复的答案中,部分商品的名字会被突出显示,右上角还有代表搜索跳转的放大镜图标,而在点击商品后弹出的新搜索结果页,还可以直接点选进入“商品”展示页。这意味着,小红书已经建立了一个从AI对话式的内容种草到电商转化的完整路径。

事实上,从小红书的产品实践可以看到,AI购物本质上就是将“搜索式电商”变成了“对话式电商”,AI能够帮助用户梳理自身需求、提供解决方案,同时在对话中提供下单路径,让消费者购物更方便、决策更省心。但值得注意的是,这套产品逻辑或许不存在太高的技术门槛,但仍然需要一定的基础条件。

AI不光要回答“买什么”,还要讲清楚“为什么买”,这考验的不只是AI的自然语言理解和逻辑推理能力,还需要有丰富的、来自真实用户的产品反馈。因为产品体验不是理论分析,AI无法仅仅通过推理完成产品的有效评价,而是需要从千人千面的实际体验中总结出不同产品的有效信息。

惊蛰研究所就注意到,千问回答“徒步路线”的问题时,给到了B站的视频链接;豆包的回答则参考了今日头条的账号内容,并且在推荐徒步装备时,又给到了对应的抖音视频链接;小红书“问一问”的内容,最后也会在“参考来源”中给到笔记链接;只有京东AI购的回答没有提供参考资料。

而从实际体验而言,丰富的参考内容不仅为AI推荐提供了“实践分析”的数据基础,也让用户能够更深入地了解商品以及自身需求,让最终决策建立在理性分析之上而不是冲动消费。

需要指出的是,AI电商并非没有缺陷。平台之间因为竞争关系存在天然信息壁垒,AI暂时无法实现实时比价;AI回答的内容准确度,也取决于其采用信源的内容时效性;AI推荐的内容,也可能会成为新的“竞价广告”陷阱。但这些可能存在的雷点,并不能掩盖AI电商实践的积极意义。

在某种程度上来说,AI电商从一开始就是带领用户从实际需求出发,一步步找到合适的商品。不管是被种草还是最终下单,让消费者买单的核心原因是因为“需要”和“适合”,而不是因为低价。

在此基础上,AI的核心目标——或者说背后电商平台的经营重点,也不再是单纯为用户提供丰富SKU,然后用优惠活动带动交易,而是让AI给到的答案更符合用户的真实需求,同时结合平台资源提供更完整的套装式货盘。自此,内容厚度和商品广度构成了“AI电商”的两大支柱。

回归到行业视角不难发现,从传统货架电商到内容电商,每次电商业态的创新和迭代都是一次用户行为习惯迁移导致的商业场景转移。对于电商平台而言,布局AI购物的首要目的可以是抢占新的流量入口,但AI电商真正的价值并不在于案头的用户数据增长,而在于精准捕捉了全新场景下的用户需求和电商形态。

消费者和电商平台一起回归“高效满足消费需求”的电商本质,也破解了过去十几年间“唯价格论”的行业竞争逻辑:平台为了让AI的解决方案更合理,就需要更重视对用户需求的挖掘、提升匹配用户需求的能力;商家要想被AI推荐,就需要把更多精力放到产品品质上。由此,电商行业才能重回良性发展的轨道。

注:文/惊蛰研究所消费组,文章来源:惊蛰研究所(公众号ID:jingzheyanjiusuo ),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:惊蛰研究所

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0