广告
加载中

我在县城“搞流量” 1年变现200+万元

运营社编辑部 2026-07-13 12:59
运营社编辑部 2026/07/13 12:59

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心分享了当前县域市场做同城流量运营的蓝海机会,以及经过实战验证的实操干货,适合想要入局本地生意的普通人参考。

1. 机会层面:目前高线城市同城运营内卷严重,投流成本持续走高,获客难度大,而县域多数实体商家尚未布局系统化线上运营,流量竞争小,属于未充分挖掘的蓝海,已有操盘手一年靠服务县城商家实现变现超200万元,帮助单个县城商家做到单渠道月增收30万元。

2. 实操干货层面:做内容不需要精致包装和复杂策划,只要清晰展示门店环境、项目、位置和优惠即可,保持2-3天更新一次就能拿到稳定流量;转化链路要做短,县域圈层集中,只要触达目标用户就有很高概率转化,要大胆搭建种草体系;要善用熟人裂变,用老带新福利激励老客分享,依托县域熟人密集的特点低成本获客。入局前也要注意,下沉市场商家认知低,沟通成本高,单客收益低,需要走量才能盈利,要提前做好准备。

当前本地生活赛道已经呈现明显的下沉趋势,县域市场成为品牌布局本地流量、挖掘新增量的蓝海,对品牌商布局下沉市场有诸多参考价值。

1. 消费与市场趋势:下沉县域商家对线上同城运营的需求已经集中爆发,多数商家未完成系统化线上布局,流量竞争小、获客成本低,加上县域熟人传播效率远高于高线城市,存在充足的增长空间。

2. 营销玩法适配:不能直接照搬高线城市精细化、重投放的复杂玩法,内容要走真实接地气的路线,突出门店、项目、优惠即可,不需要复杂人设铺垫;要缩短转化链路,依托县域熟人圈层打造老带新裂变活动,用低福利撬动低成本获客。

3. 合作注意点:县域商家普遍预算有限,只看重快速获客结果,品牌给到下沉商家的运营支持要偏向轻量化、结果导向,降低合作门槛,更易拓展市场。

对于做本地生意的县域卖家来说,当前同城线上流量是全新的增长机会,本文整理了可落地的操作方法,以及明确的机会与风险提示。

1. 机会判断:目前绝大多数县域实体商家都没有做系统化线上运营,同城流量竞争极小,获客难度和成本远低于高线城市,只要做好基础内容布局就能稳定获客增收,已有多个实战案例验证,单店可以做到单月增收30万、20天卖出58万元团购套餐的成绩。

2. 可落地实操方法:内容端做真实接地气的门店实拍,突出位置、环境、项目和优惠即可,不需要精致包装,保持2-3天更新一次就足够;转化端要简化链路,主动搭建线上种草体系,县域圈层集中,内容触达就有很高概率转化;营销端重点做老带新裂变,用小福利激励老客在朋友圈、本地社群转发,依托熟人信任实现低成本获客。

3. 风险提示:不要盲目跟风高线城市的重投放、精细化玩法,要结合自身有限的预算,优先追求快速拿到获客结果,控制试错成本。

本文分享的县域本地生活流量红利,对服务下沉市场的工厂挖掘商业机会、推进数字化转型有不少启示。

1. 商业机会:当前下沉县域市场的本地生活正在加速线上化,大量本地中小商家产生了对线上运营配套服务与产品的需求,对应性价比高的轻量化拍摄设备、简单易用的运营工具、本地营销物料等产品的需求会持续增长,工厂可以针对性布局相关品类,抢占下沉市场增量。

2. 产品生产设计方向:针对To B县域商家的产品,要适配商家预算有限、追求简单易用的需求,砍掉复杂冗余功能,做高性价比的标准化轻量化产品,不需要过度包装。针对To C的产品,要贴合县域用户务实的消费特点,突出实用价值和性价比,更容易获得用户认可。

3. 数字化拓客启示:工厂拓展下沉市场To B业务,可以借鉴同城运营的玩法,做接地气的内容展示产品,联动本地渠道合伙人拓客,降低自身获客成本,提升拓客效率。

对于做同城运营服务的服务商来说,本文梳理了县域市场的行业趋势、客户痛点和成熟解决方案,干货价值很高。

1. 行业发展趋势:当前高线城市同城运营服务赛道内卷严重,投流成本升高,投产下滑,很多服务商陷入增长困境,而县域商家对代运营、陪跑、运营培训的需求正在集中爆发,市场空白大竞争小,是服务商实现弯道超车的新蓝海,已经有服务商一年变现超200万元,半数业绩来自县域商家。

2. 客户核心痛点:县域商家多是中小夫妻店或个体户,大多没有专业运营人员,线上认知薄弱,预算有限,排斥高成本投流,核心诉求就是快速拿到客资结果;同时服务商沟通教育成本高,单客收益微薄,需要走量才能盈利,原有高线城市的服务体系无法直接复用。

3. 落地方案:拓客端联动县域本地渠道合伙人,依托本地资源触达商家,降低拓客成本;运营端适配县域特点,做轻量化接地气的内容,缩短转化链路,引导商家做熟人裂变;交付端聚焦核心获客链路,打磨极致标准化的交付流程,未来可采用标品加AI交付的模式,满足县域商家客单价低、交付快的需求。

本文呈现了县域市场本地商家的核心需求,对本地生活平台布局下沉市场、优化运营管理有不少参考。

1. 商家需求总结:县域中小商家有强烈的线上获客需求,但普遍预算有限、缺乏专业运营能力,大部分商家开通平台店铺后处于闲置状态,没有做精细化运营,对低门槛、轻量化、能快速出结果的运营工具和服务需求强烈。

2. 平台运营优化方向:针对商家内容能力弱的特点,推出简单易操作的实拍内容模板,降低内容生产门槛;算法层面加大同城精准推荐的权重,适配县域圈层集中的特点;开发轻量化的老带新裂变营销工具,满足商家低成本获客的需求。

3. 招商与管理方向:县域市场目前空白大,平台可以加大下沉招商力度,推出低门槛的入驻扶持政策,抢占市场先机;同时可以联动本地运营服务商共同服务商家,提升商家留存和产出,降低平台服务成本,还要注意规避大平台服务体系不适配中小商家的问题,针对性调整政策。

本文呈现了国内本地生活同城运营赛道的最新产业动向,暴露了下沉市场发展过程中的新问题,对行业研究有较高的参考价值。

1. 产业新动向:本地生活运营服务赛道已经出现明显的下沉转移趋势,大量资深操盘手和服务商开始布局三四线及县域市场,依托代运营、陪跑、运营培训等业务实现弯道超车;同时县域市场的同城运营逻辑和高线城市完全不同,行业已经摸索出轻量化内容、短转化链路、熟人裂变的适配性新玩法。

2. 行业新问题:下沉县域市场虽然红利充足,但也存在尚未解决的痛点,服务商需要投入大量成本做商家市场教育,沟通成本高;县域商家单客预算低、单客收益薄,服务商需要走量才能盈利,但是标准化交付难度大,高线城市成熟的服务体系无法直接复用。

3. 商业模式探索:目前行业正在探索适配县域市场的新商业模式,核心方向包括聚焦核心获客链路做极致标准化交付、联动本地合伙人降低拓客成本、采用标品加AI交付的模式解决交付效率与客单价的矛盾,这一模式的最终效果还有待市场验证,是值得后续跟踪研究的新方向。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article shares core insights on the blue ocean opportunity for in-city traffic operations in China’s county-level markets, along with battle-tested practical strategies, serving as a valuable reference for ordinary people looking to enter local businesses.

1. Market Opportunity: In-city local operations in top-tier Chinese cities are already highly saturated, with rising ad costs and increasing customer acquisition difficulty. By contrast, most physical merchants in county-level markets have not yet built systematic online operations, resulting in low traffic competition and largely untapped potential. Currently, some operators already generate over ¥2 million in annual revenue by serving county-level merchants, and have helped single local merchants boost monthly revenue by ¥300,000 through a single channel.

2. Actionable Strategies: Content creation does not require elaborate production or complex planning. Merchants only need to clearly show their store environment, services, location and promotions, and maintain an update frequency of once every 2-3 days to secure a steady flow of traffic. Keep conversion paths short: given the tight-knit social structure of counties, reaching target users already delivers high conversion rates, so merchants should proactively build a content seeding system. Merchants should also leverage word-of-mouth referrals from existing customers: offer small incentives for existing customers to bring new clients, tapping into dense local social networks to acquire customers at low cost. Entrants should also note that merchants in lower-tier markets generally have limited digital awareness, leading to high communication costs and low per-customer revenue. Profitability requires high transaction volume, so adequate preparation is needed in advance.

The local lifestyle sector is now showing a clear downward penetration trend, with county-level markets emerging as a blue ocean for brands to capture local traffic and unlock new growth. This article provides actionable insights for brands expanding into lower-tier markets.

1. Consumption and Market Trends: Demand for online in-city operations among county-level merchants has surged, while most have not yet completed systematic online layout. This market features low traffic competition, low customer acquisition costs, and far more efficient word-of-mouth spread through local social connections than top-tier cities, leaving substantial room for growth.

2. Adapted Marketing Tactics: Brands should not directly copy the elaborate, high-ad-spend strategies that work in top-tier cities. Content should be authentic and down-to-earth, focusing on showcasing stores, services and promotions, rather than building complex brand personas. Shorten conversion paths and leverage tight-knit local social circles to run referral programs, acquiring new customers at low cost with small incentives.

3. Key Partnership Notes: Most county-level merchants have limited budgets and prioritize fast customer acquisition results. Brands should design lightweight, result-oriented operation support for lower-tier merchants and lower partnership barriers to facilitate market expansion.

For local sellers operating in county-level markets, online in-city traffic represents an entirely new growth opportunity. This article整理了可落地的操作方法,以及明确的机会与风险提示。

1. Opportunity Assessment: The vast majority of physical merchants in county-level markets have not built systematic online operations, leading to very low competition for in-city traffic. Customer acquisition difficulty and costs are far lower than in top-tier cities: steady customer acquisition and revenue growth can be achieved just by building basic content layouts. Verified by multiple real-world cases, single stores have achieved ¥300,000 in monthly revenue growth, and sold ¥580,000 worth of group-buying packages in 20 days.

2. Implementable Tactics: For content, create authentic, down-to-earth实拍 content of stores, highlighting location, environment, services and promotions. Elaborate production is unnecessary, and updating once every 2-3 days is sufficient. For conversion, simplify the path and proactively build an online content seeding system: given the concentrated social circles in counties, reaching users with content already delivers a high conversion probability. For marketing, prioritize customer referral programs: use small incentives to encourage existing customers to share in WeChat Moments and local groups, tapping into social trust to acquire customers at low cost.

3. Risk Warnings: Do not blindly follow the high-ad-spend, elaborate strategies used in top-tier cities. Align tactics with your limited budget, prioritize fast customer acquisition results, and keep trial-and-error costs under control.

The untapped traffic opportunity in county-level local lifestyle shared in this article offers useful insights for factories serving lower-tier markets to unlock new business opportunities and advance digital transformation.

1. Business Opportunity: The online transformation of local lifestyle in county-level markets is accelerating, and a large number of small and medium-sized local merchants have generated demand for online operation supporting products and services. Demand for cost-effective lightweight shooting equipment, easy-to-use operation tools, local marketing materials and other related products will continue to grow. Factories can develop targeted product lines to capture growth in this untapped lower-tier market.

2. Product Design Direction: For B2B products targeting county-level merchants, align with their needs of limited budgets and demand for simple, easy-to-use tools: cut redundant complex functions to build cost-effective, standardized, lightweight products, and avoid overpackaging. For B2C products, align with the pragmatic consumption characteristics of county-level users, highlighting practical value and cost-effectiveness to win user recognition more easily.

3. Insights for Digital Customer Acquisition: For factories expanding B2B business in lower-tier markets, you can draw on in-city operation tactics: showcase your products through down-to-earth content, partner with local channel partners to acquire customers, reduce your own customer acquisition costs and improve expansion efficiency.

For service providers offering in-city operation services, this article梳理了县域市场的行业趋势、客户痛点和成熟解决方案, delivering high practical value.

1. Industry Trend: The in-city operation service sector is already highly saturated in top-tier Chinese cities, with rising ad costs, falling return on investment, and many service providers stuck in a growth rut. By contrast, demand for third-party operation, coaching and training services among county-level merchants is surging, with large untapped market potential and low competition, making it a new blue ocean for service providers to achieve overtaking. Some service providers already generate over ¥2 million in annual revenue, with half of their total revenue coming from county-level merchants.

2. Core Customer Pain Points: Most county-level merchants are small family-owned businesses or self-employed operators, with no dedicated operation staff, limited digital awareness, tight budgets, and reluctance to spend heavily on ads. Their core demand is fast access to qualified customer leads. At the same time, service providers face high costs for merchant education and communication, with low per-customer revenue. Profitability requires high volume, and existing service systems built for top-tier cities cannot be directly reused.

3. Implementation Plan: For customer acquisition, partner with local channel partners in counties to reach merchants through local resources and reduce expansion costs. For operations, adapt to county market characteristics by creating lightweight, down-to-earth content, shortening conversion paths, and guiding merchants to run social referral programs. For service delivery, focus on core customer acquisition funnels and build a highly standardized delivery process. Going forward, a "standard product + AI delivery" model can meet the demand of county-level merchants for low price points and fast delivery.

This article outlines the core demands of local merchants in county-level markets, offering useful references for local lifestyle platforms expanding into lower-tier markets and optimizing operation management.

1. Summary of Merchant Demands: Small and medium-sized county-level merchants have strong demand for online customer acquisition, but most have limited budgets and lack professional operation capabilities. Most leave their platform store accounts idle after opening, with no fine-grained operation, and have strong demand for low-threshold, lightweight operation tools and services that can deliver fast results.

2. Platform Operation Optimization: To address merchants' weak content production capabilities, platforms can launch simple, easy-to-use实拍 content templates to lower the barrier for content creation. For algorithms, increase the weight of in-city精准推荐 to adapt to the concentrated social structure of county markets. Develop lightweight referral marketing tools to meet merchants' demand for low-cost customer acquisition.

3. Merchant Recruitment and Management: The county-level market remains largely untapped, so platforms can increase recruitment efforts in lower-tier regions and launch low-threshold onboarding support policies to capture first-mover advantage. Platforms can also partner with local operation service providers to jointly serve merchants, improving merchant retention and output while reducing platform service costs. It is also important to avoid the problem that large platform service systems are not adapted to small and medium-sized merchants, and adjust policies accordingly.

This article presents the latest industry developments in China's local in-city lifestyle operation sector, and identifies new emerging pain points in the development of lower-tier markets, offering high reference value for industry research.

1. New Industry Developments: The local lifestyle operation service sector is already showing a clear downward penetration trend, with a large number of experienced operators and service providers beginning to expand into third- and fourth-tier cities and county-level markets, achieving growth through third-party operation, coaching, training and other services. At the same time, in-city operation logic in county-level markets is completely different from that in top-tier cities, and the industry has developed adapted new tactics: lightweight content, short conversion paths, and social referral marketing.

2. New Industry Pain Points: While the county-level market offers substantial untapped opportunities, it also has unresolved pain points. Service providers need to invest heavily in merchant education, leading to high communication costs. County-level merchants have low per-customer budgets and deliver low per-customer revenue, forcing service providers to pursue high volume to turn a profit. However, standardized delivery is difficult to achieve, and mature service systems from top-tier markets cannot be directly reused.

3. Business Model Exploration: The industry is currently exploring new business models adapted to county-level markets. Core directions include focusing on core customer acquisition funnels to achieve highly standardized delivery, partnering with local partners to reduce customer acquisition costs, and adopting the "standard product + AI delivery" model to resolve the conflict between delivery efficiency and low customer price points. The final effectiveness of this model remains to be verified by the market, making it a new direction worth tracking in future research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

作者 | 张帆

编辑 | 陈维贤

设计 | 蝶哥

在县城帮本地商家做运营是一门好生意吗?

提起同城线上运营,多数人的固有认知会直接绑定一线、新一线城市。大家默认只有大城市流量充足、消费群体庞大,做短视频、小红书、团购同城获客才更容易跑出亮眼业绩。

但近两年本地生活赛道风向已经明显转变,高线城市同行扎堆、投流成本持续走高,内容与投放内卷进入白热化,很多操盘手陷入获客难、投产下滑的困境。与之相反,一批运营服务商积极探索下沉三四线、县域市场,依托代运营、陪跑、线上运营培训等业务,实现了弯道超车。

在5 月份运营创业联盟组织 的“运营+AI创业者闭门课”里,我们见到了不少扎根在本地同城做运营服务的创业者。有操盘手在四线城市卖珠宝,两个月撬动了10万成交。再比如运营创业联盟的资深会员邓威曾帮助一家县城口腔医疗机构在小红书从0 起盘,不到3 个月时间就帮助门店单渠道每月稳定增收30万元。

还有另一位教育行业的资深操盘手薛一,创业帮商家“搞同城流量”一年变现超200万元,其中半数业绩来自县城、地级市商家。

在很多本地生活细分赛道,下沉市场的机会正在慢慢涌现,难道低线城市的钱更好赚吗?同样做运营,县城市场有何不一样?这块市场还有哪些红利和机会值得挖掘?

01

他们在县城市场找机会,

有人一年狂揽超百万元

打开邓威的高德地图,过去一年他去了一个又一个城市,服务了不少来自三线、四线乃至县城的商家。

邓威是一位有十多年运营经验的资深操盘手,四年前开了一家提供运营服务的创业公司,主要帮口腔医疗领域的商家提供同城引流、获客等代运营服务。

他告诉运营社,最近几年行业正在悄悄发生变化。一方面,越来越多机构愈发重视线上渠道,竞争变得激烈,内卷严重。一个明显的特征是,过去口腔医疗机构在小红书同城获客相对容易,定期发笔记就有机会获得客资。如今,同行扎堆涌入,不仅要卷内容,还要卷链路和投流。

另一方面,越来越多低线城市的商家也开始意识到布局小红书的重要性,主动找上门寻求帮助。比如他们曾服务过一家江西九江的口腔医疗夫妻店,夫妻二人皆为牙医。商家的痛点是线下客流不稳定,希望靠小红书等线上渠道引流同城用户。邓威帮他们构思并落地了一套获客思路,用矩阵账号持续内容种草,再做线索转化。仅用三个月就拿到了成绩,单渠道每月稳定增收30万元,门店生意风生水起。

同样做运营服务的创业者薛一也有类似感受,他是一位教育领域的资深操盘手,过去几年,他们向超过2000家教育公司提供了代运营、陪跑、运营培训等服务。

薛一告诉运营社,他们的客户中低线城市商家数量增长明显,低线城市商家对同城线上流量的需求正在集中爆发。数据统计,过去一年他们运营服务的营收超200万元,其中大约有一半由低线城市商家贡献。

在薛一和邓威看来,下沉市场商家对代运营、陪跑等运营服务的需求,正在变得越来越强烈。

具体而言,这些需求呈现出几个鲜明特征。

第一,商家规模相对较小,大多是夫妻店或个体户。

邓威服务的口腔机构往往由十几人团队组成,薛一服务的教育公司大部分年营收在百万左右,多数公司没有专门的运营人员,由员工或老板兼任运营岗。

第二,商家预算有限,同时渴求迅速拿到结果。

薛一告诉运营社,县域商家往往不在乎运营过程,更重视获客结果。具体而言,老板普遍不懂线上底层逻辑,不愿意花费时间学习拍摄、剪辑、账号运营,合作核心诉求只有快速拿到客资。

与此同时,商家们的运营预算也比较有限,不会投入太多试错成本,很容易合作到一半就慢慢放弃,对投流等容易拉高预算的运营方式比较排斥。

第三,低线城市获客相对容易,市场还不内卷。

下沉市场也有一些优势,因为很多商家还没有完善地布局线上渠道,同城流量竞争还不激烈,以小红书口腔医疗赛道举例,部分小城市甚至还完全没有商家布局种草内容,用户很难搜索到相关的同城内容。

所以,在这些“蓝海市场”,商家往往只要做好内容和链路,就有机会轻松地拿到客资。“相比一线城市的高强度内卷,这里还有很多红利与机会。”

02

一个月增收30万,

在县城获客有哪些诀窍?

同样是做同城流量运营、线上种草获客,县域市场与一线城市有着本质的逻辑差异。照搬大城市精细化、重投放、重矩阵的内卷打法,在县城不仅难以起量,还会造成资源浪费。

结合多位资深操盘手的实战经验,我们梳理出低线城市专属的同城获客核心诀窍,核心差异集中在内容、转化、分享裂变等三方面。

1)更接地气的内容,更容易在县城种草

一、二线城市的同城内容运营,早已形成标准化的精细运营体系。以教培赛道为例,想要持续稳定获取线索,几乎必须搭建完整的内容矩阵,打造多个差异化IP及人设,实现内容分层布局。

即便是同一账号也需要定期更新利他干货内容、人设塑造内容、种草获客内容、转化成交内容等不同属性的视频或图文,层层铺垫、精准配比,依靠精细化内容设计,在海量同行中突围。

但在县城市场,这套复杂的内容逻辑完全不适用,县域用户不看重精致剪辑,反而更在意真实、直观、接地气的内容。

所以目前在县域做种草,往往无需复杂的策划、无需精致的画面、也无需多层人设铺垫,只要清晰展示门店环境、服务项目、地理位置、优惠福利,就足以打动同城用户、实现有效种草。

教培领域的资深操盘手薛一向运营社分享过一个真实案例,他曾服务过一家县域托管机构,他们曾策划发布了一条校区探店视频,只是清晰展示了校区离学校近、配套服务齐全等细节,就成功吸引了50+ 个家长主动咨询。

另一个案例更具代表性,四川南充的发型师安迪,深耕当地市场,仅借助接地气的视频种草,再用直播卖团购做承接,就实现了20天卖出58万元美发团购套餐的好成绩。

安迪的内容思路简单又高效,即持续输出同城种草视频,内容不精致包装,但会主动在开头露出城市地标、门店实景,吸引本地用户的眼球;再结合低线城市用户的消费特点,针对性地输出种草内容和服务介绍,最终借助抖音团购撬动心动用户。

另一位资深操盘手邓威也认为,在低线城市做获客,没必要设计太复杂的种草策略,轻量化的获客逻辑可能更有效。他在服务三、四线城市口腔赛道的客户时,也会将重点放在门店实拍和医师基础科普上。

邓威强调,在县域市场,商家不必浪费资源做深度内容,也无需“跟风”一线城市的头部商家做日更,而是找到自己的节奏,维持2~3天更新一次的频率,就基本能拿到不错的同城流量,稳定获取客资。

2)转化链路更短,触达就可能撬动成交

城市层级不同,用户认知、转化链路天差地别。一线城市用户接触线上信息渠道丰富,常年被海量同城营销内容熏陶,辨别广告能力极强,消费决策十分谨慎。商家想要实现成交,需要通过多层科普铺垫、多维度内容种草、长期私域培育,转化链路漫长且复杂。

低线城市市场完全相反,城市圈层小、熟人社交密集,尤其是在教培、口腔医疗等垂直类目,一座县城可能只有几家相关的门店,大部分有需求的用户很可能在刷到种草信息前,就已经在线下见过相关门店,对商家存在一些认知。

针对这类用户,一条简单的实拍短视频、一次基础的线上科普,就有机会快速触发用户咨询意愿,转化链路极短、成交效率更高。

比如薛一不久前服务了一个湖南澧县的教培客户,他们发布的第一条视频仅收获了7 个播放量,就吸引到了2 个意向用户。这说明,县域人口圈层高度集中,同城推荐也更精准,只要内容能触达,就有很高的几率实现转化,所以县域商家应该更大胆、主动地去搭建线上种草体系,往往内容发出来,就有可能撬动成交。

3)一个分享触达多个客户,裂变是县域运营最大红利之一

县域市场,还有一个值得所有商家都关注的红利:分享裂变。

薛一向运营社透露,他发现相比于大城市用户社交分散、流动性强,县城人口圈层高度集中,邻里、亲友、同事交集紧密,口碑传播、熟人裂变的效率,远超一二线城市。

具体而言,在低线城市一条用户的朋友圈,一个本地社群的转发,更容易快速辐射整片同城精准客群。

还是以教培市场举例,当一位家长主动在朋友圈、社群内容帮助分享、转播商家的种草内容时,身边的亲友、邻居、孩子同学的家长很容易就被触达,这些人群中往往大概率有同类消费需求,看了种草内容后,很可能会主动咨询门店情况。

这种基于熟人信任的自发传播,无需商家付费投放,就能持续撬动新生客源。

因此薛一认为,县域门店的核心获客诀窍之一,就是深耕口碑裂变活动。通过体验课、到店福利、老带新专属优惠等轻量化活动,激励老客分享转发,依托私域社群、朋友圈持续破圈,用极低的成本实现客流翻倍的效果。

另外,他还强调,同样的裂变活动,在大城市商家会有很多顾虑,会担心触达的用户不精准、用户可能会有负反馈,但在规模比较小的低线城市,类似的顾虑几乎不存在。

03

结语

综合两位操盘手的一线实战经验可以看出,目前本地生活领域县域市场还存在一些未被充分挖掘的蓝海,运营服务商下沉掘金,有着清晰路径和充足的红利做支撑。

一方面,低线城市市场相对空白,除餐饮等少数饱和赛道外,绝大多数县城实体商家未做系统化线上运营,即便开通店铺、商家团购,也大多处于闲置停滞状态,很少做精细化运营。率先入局的商家和服务商,能够快速抢占本地用户心智,建立独家同城流量壁垒,几乎无需面对激烈竞争。

另一方面,县域获客难度低。无需高额付费投放、无需精致内容制作,轻量化的实拍内容就有机会实现稳定引流,帮助商家实现破局。

但下沉市场并非完美赛道,红利与困境始终相伴相生。薛一坦言,县城商家普遍存在线上认知薄弱的问题,服务商需要投入大量时间做市场教育,沟通成本高、交付流程繁琐。

同时,县城商家单个门店预算少、单客收益微薄,服务商仅靠零散小店很难实现盈利,必须依靠大批量商家走量才能维持营收。可标准化恰恰是下沉市场运营最大的难题 ,一线连锁品牌、高线大客户成熟的服务体系,不能完全直接照搬给县城中小商家,两套市场的需求、预算、执行能力差距悬殊。

针对这一痛点,运营社创始人小贤给了两条建议:

1、聚焦单条可落地的获客转化链路,打磨完整流程并做到极致标准化,只保留能直接产出客源的核心动作,剔除复杂高成本环节;

2、联动县域本地渠道合伙人借力拓客,借助线下门店、本地社群、行业资源快速触达大批实体商家,降低自主拓客成本。

目前,薛一、邓威等运营领域的创业者虽然都看好低线城市、县域市场的机会和红利,但都还没有选择All in,因为这块“蛋糕”虽然香甜,但却并不容易拿下来。这也是他们今年5 月份来参加运营创业联盟线下闭门课想要找到的答案。他们希望在运营创业联盟里完成产品升级,通过标品 +AI服务交付的形式,以满足“客单价低、交付快”的县域商家需求。

最后,你如何看待在县域帮本地商家做运营,你认为这是一门好生意吗?

注:文/运营社编辑部,文章来源:运营研究社(公众号ID:U_quan),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:运营研究社

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

下沉市场县域同城流量运营有哪些发展机会?

当前县域本地生活赛道多数领域尚未内卷,绝大多数实体商家未做系统化线上运营,同城流量竞争小,无需高额付费投放,靠轻量化实拍内容就能稳定获客,商家对线上获客的需求正在集中爆发,已有运营服务商年变现超200万元。

县域商家做同城线上获客有什么实用技巧?

县域同城获客可从三方面落地:内容主打真实接地气的门店实拍、服务介绍,2-3天更新一次即可;转化无需多层内容铺垫,触达精准用户即可撬动成交;可通过老带新优惠、到店福利等活动做熟人裂变,低成本获客。

在县域做同城流量运营服务存在哪些痛点?

县域做同城流量运营服务的主要痛点包括:商家线上认知薄弱,服务商需投入大量时间做市场教育,沟通成本高、交付流程繁琐;单个商家预算低,单客收益微薄,需规模化走量才能盈利,高线城市的成熟运营体系无法直接照搬。

县域同城流量运营服务商怎么提升盈利能力?

服务商可通过两个方向优化:一是聚焦可落地的获客转化链路,打磨极致标准化的服务流程,仅保留核心获客动作,剔除高成本环节;二是联动县域本地渠道合伙人拓客,降低自主获客成本,也可尝试结合AI服务提升交付效率。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0