广告
加载中

黄峥要让假货滚出拼多多

李响 2026-06-16 14:57
李响 2026/06/16 14:57

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章核心信息是拼多多升级系统性假货治理,同时国内主流电商平台都在收紧售假管控,普通读者可以得到这些干货:

1. 拼多多此次打假不是短期活动,是长期系统性整治,重点针对标题打擦边球、主图隐性展示品牌标识的售假商家,抽检定向覆盖运动户外、服饰箱包、食品母婴等高风险、高投诉的7个类目,不再随机抽检,擦边商家被查到的概率大幅提升。

2. 此次规则明确把遮挡商标绕开监管、以原单代购尾货名义售假列为严重违规,山寨判定从单一文字比对升级为结合消费反馈、交易数据的综合判断,不合规商家会被要求追加保证金,不补缴将被降权清退。

3. 当前全行业都在收紧打假,未来电商平台售假空间会大幅压缩,普通消费者买到假货山寨的概率会明显降低,整体购物信任度会持续提升。

当前全电商平台都在加码假货山寨治理,对品牌商来说,这些干货和机会值得关注:

1. 拼多多此次系统性整治,精准打击蹭品牌流量的擦边售假、山寨商家,明确禁止使用品牌变形词、近似包装装潢,判定标准从文字比对升级为全链路综合判断,解决了过去品牌被仿冒蹭流量却难以界定的痛点,品牌方的经营环境更公平。

2. 拼多多正推进平台升级,引入更多品牌旗舰店,此次打假可以提升平台整体信任度,消除品牌方对平台充斥仿冒品的顾虑,更利于品牌商入驻拼多多拓展新渠道。

3. 除拼多多外,抖音、淘宝、京东都推出了对应的打假机制,整个电商行业的售假空间被持续压缩,正规品牌的价格竞争环境更干净,品牌可以把更多精力放在产品研发和用户运营上。

拼多多此次升级打假规则,同时全行业都在收紧售假管控,卖家可以得到这些政策、风险和机会相关的干货:

1. 核心政策变化:拼多多现在定向抽检高风险类目,明确把遮挡商标绕开监管、用原单代购名义售假、山寨擦边列为严重违规,判定不再只看文字,会结合全链路消费数据综合判断,高风险商家会被要求追加保证金,不补缴就会被降权清退。

2. 风险提示:靠仿冒、擦边、信息差存活的卖家,现在违规空间几乎消失,哪怕是被上游供货商误导,拿不出品牌授权和完整进货凭证,也无法申诉成功,大概率会被清退、冻结资金。

3. 机会提示:有正规授权、完整供应链的合规卖家,会获得更好的经营环境,平台流量会更向合规商家倾斜,长期经营必须转向合规,主动获取正规授权、搭建正规供应链才能留在场内。

全电商行业收紧假货治理,对工厂来说,这些干货和启示值得关注:

1. 产品生产需求变化:过去做仿冒知名品牌、模仿品牌包装外观的灰色代工订单,在平台新规下下游商家无法售卖,这类订单未来会逐渐消失,工厂不能再布局这类灰色生意。

2. 新的商业机会:平台清理不合规商家后,会加大力度引入正规品牌旗舰店,正规品牌的代工订单需求会持续上升,产能达标、质量合格的工厂,可以对接正规品牌的代工需求,拓展长期稳定的正规生意。

3. 数字化转型启示:现在电商平台都在用数据化方式管控假货,要求全链路可追溯,工厂需要推进自身供应链数字化,保留完整的生产、供货凭证,既可以帮助下游商家应对平台抽检,也能规避自身的合规风险。

电商行业全平台加码假货治理,给服务商带来了新的行业趋势和业务机会,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:电商行业已经从早期的野蛮流量扩张,转向合规化经营阶段,整个行业的假货灰色地带在持续压缩,围绕商家合规经营的服务需求会快速增长,这是未来很长一段时间的行业红利方向。

2. 当前客户核心痛点:大量中小卖家原本做擦边生意,现在面对平台新规则,缺少正规品牌授权对接渠道,也没有完整的供应链凭证管理能力,不知道怎么完成合规转型,很容易踩违规坑,甚至被清退。

3. 业务解决方案方向:服务商可以针对性开发新业务,比如品牌授权对接服务、供应链凭证数字化管理工具、商家合规经营咨询服务,帮助中小卖家适配平台新规则,完成合规转型,抓住行业转型的业务机会。

拼多多此次系统性打假,给所有平台商提供了治理经验和方向参考,核心干货如下:

1. 可复用的最新治理做法:拼多多这套组合治理策略效果清晰,包括定向抽检高风险类目,明确把遮挡商标、原单代购名义售假列为严重违规,把判定标准从单一文字比对拓展为全链路消费数据综合判定,用追加保证金的方式提前筛选高风险商家,倒逼不合规商家主动退出,这套方法可以复用在平台假货治理中。

2. 风险规避方向:当前外部监管要求平台从事后假货处理转向事前风控,主动发现拦截问题,否则会面临法律风险和舆论风险,平台必须主动推进假货治理,才能合规经营。

3. 长期发展价值:假货治理短期可能影响商家数量,但长期可以提升平台信任度,吸引品牌商家和高消费力用户,帮助平台完成升级拓展长期发展空间,是平台做大做强必须跨过的关口。

此次全行业加码假货治理,反映了电商行业的新动向,给产业研究提供了很多新的干货内容:

1. 产业新动向:中国电商行业已经完成了早期的流量扩张阶段,正式进入信任构建和合规化发展阶段,行业竞争从拼低价、拼流量转向拼信任、拼合规,整个行业的灰色经营空间正在持续缩小,合规化已经成为不可逆转的主流趋势。

2. 治理模式新样本:拼多多推出的全链路数据综合判定假货、风险前置的保证金筛选机制,加上抖音的BIC质检仓制度、淘宝的知产保护AI系统、京东的源头管控模式,丰富了电商平台假货治理的商业模式,为研究平台治理提供了新的案例。

3. 研究启示:电商平台要实现长期增长和升级,必须解决假货山寨的痼疾,主动适配合规监管要求,净化平台生态,才能获得品牌方和消费者的信任,这对研究平台商业模式演化、产业升级路径都有重要的参考价值。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article centers on Pinduoduo’s upgrade to its systematic counterfeit goods governance, alongside stricter anti-counterfeiting enforcement across China’s major domestic e-commerce platforms. Key takeaways for general readers are as follows:

1. Pinduoduo’s latest anti-counterfeiting campaign is not a short-term crackdown, but a long-term systematic overhaul. It specifically targets sellers that engage in "edge-ball" counterfeiting—including using misleading product titles and hiding unauthorized brand logos in main product images. Unlike previous random inspections, the platform now conducts targeted sampling across 7 high-risk, high-complaint categories including sports & outdoor goods, apparel, bags, food, and mother & baby products, drastically increasing the detection rate of non-compliant sellers.

2. The updated rules explicitly classify hiding trademarks to evade regulation, and selling counterfeits under the guise of "original factory goods," "parallel imports" or "overstock" as severe violations. The counterfeit判定标准has been upgraded from a simple text comparison to a comprehensive assessment that incorporates consumer feedback and transaction data. Non-compliant sellers are required to add to their security deposits; those that fail to comply will face reduced search ranking or removal from the platform.

3. With stricter anti-counterfeiting measures rolling out across the entire industry, the room for counterfeit sales on e-commerce platforms will shrink sharply. This will significantly reduce the likelihood of consumers purchasing counterfeit or copycat goods, and steadily improve overall shopping trust in the e-commerce sector.

E-commerce platforms across the board are ramping up efforts to combat counterfeit and copycat goods. Key takeaways and opportunities for brand owners are as follows:

1. Pinduoduo’s systematic crackdown precisely targets counterfeit and copycat sellers that free-ride on brand equity. The platform explicitly prohibits the use of modified brand terms and imitative packaging, and has updated its counterfeit判定标准from simple text comparison to a full-funnel comprehensive assessment. This addresses the longstanding pain point for brands where free-riding counterfeiting was difficult to formally界定, creating a fairer operating environment for brand owners.

2. As part of its broader platform upgrade, Pinduoduo is actively recruiting more official brand flagship stores. This anti-counterfeiting push will boost overall platform trust,消除 brands’ longstanding concerns that the platform is saturated with counterfeits, and make it easier for brands to enter Pinduoduo to expand into new sales channels.

3. Beyond Pinduoduo, Douyin, Taobao, and JD.com have all rolled out dedicated anti-counterfeiting mechanisms. As counterfeit sales space shrinks across the entire industry, legitimate brands now operate in a cleaner price competition environment, allowing them to redirect more resources to product R&D and user operations.

Pinduoduo has upgraded its anti-counterfeiting rules, and the entire e-commerce industry is tightening counterfeit sales controls. Key insights on policy changes, risks and opportunities for sellers are as follows:

1. Core policy changes: Pinduoduo now conducts targeted inspections of high-risk categories, explicitly classifies hiding trademarks to evade regulation, selling counterfeits under the guise of "original factory goods" or "parallel imports," and copycat edge-ball practices as severe violations.判定no longer relies solely on text checks, but incorporates full-funnel consumer data for comprehensive assessment. High-risk sellers are required to increase their security deposits, and failure to comply will lead to reduced search ranking or removal from the platform.

2. Risk warning: Sellers that relied on counterfeiting, edge-ball practices, and information asymmetry to operate now have almost no room for non-compliance. Even if sellers are misled by upstream suppliers, they cannot win appeals if they lack official brand authorization and complete supply chain purchase proof, and will most likely be removed from the platform and have their funds frozen.

3. Opportunity note: Compliant sellers with official authorization and complete, legitimate supply chains will benefit from a better operating environment, as platform traffic will increasingly be directed toward compliant merchants. Long-term operations require a shift to compliance; proactively securing official authorization and building a legitimate supply chain are the only ways to remain on the platform.

The entire e-commerce industry is tightening counterfeit governance. Key insights and implications for manufacturers are as follows:

1. Shifts in production demand: Gray-area production orders for counterfeiting famous brands and imitating brand packaging and designs can no longer be sold by downstream sellers under the new platform rules. This type of order will gradually disappear, so factories should no longer invest in this type of gray business.

2. New business opportunities: After clearing out non-compliant sellers, platforms will ramp up efforts to recruit official brand flagship stores. Demand for contracted manufacturing from legitimate brands will continue to grow. Factories that meet production capacity and quality standards can secure contracted manufacturing orders from legitimate brands, and expand long-term, stable, compliant business.

3. Implications for digital transformation: E-commerce platforms now use data-driven methods to control counterfeits, and require full supply chain traceability. Factories need to advance their own supply chain digitalization, and retain complete production and supply documentation. This not only helps downstream sellers pass platform inspections, but also mitigates the factory’s own compliance risks.

The ramp-up of counterfeit governance across all e-commerce platforms has created new industry trends and business opportunities for service providers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry trend: The e-commerce industry has shifted from the early stage of aggressive growth-at-all-costs to a phase of compliance-focused operations. The gray counterfeit market continues to shrink, and demand for services that support sellers’ compliant operations is growing rapidly. This will be a major source of industry growth for the foreseeable future.

2. Core pain points of current clients: A large number of small and medium-sized sellers that previously operated edge-ball businesses now face new platform rules. These sellers lack access to official brand authorization channels, do not have the capability to manage complete supply chain documentation, and do not know how to complete a compliance transition, leaving them at high risk of violating rules and even being removed from the platform.

3. Directions for business solutions: Service providers can develop new targeted offerings, such as brand authorization matching services, digital management tools for supply chain documentation, and compliance consulting for sellers. These services help small and medium-sized sellers adapt to the new platform rules, complete their compliance transition, and allow service providers to capitalize on the opportunities from this industry-wide transition.

Pinduoduo’s latest systematic anti-counterfeiting drive provides valuable governance experience and directional guidance for all platform operators. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Replicable latest governance practices: Pinduoduo’s combined governance strategy has clear proven effectiveness, including targeted sampling of high-risk categories, explicit classification of hiding trademarks and selling counterfeits under the "original goods/parallel import" pretense as severe violations, expanding the判定标准from single text comparison to full-funnel comprehensive assessment based on consumer data, and using security deposit top-up requirements to pre-screen high-risk sellers and force non-compliant operators to exit voluntarily. This framework can be replicated for counterfeit governance on other platforms.

2. Risk mitigation direction: Current regulatory requirements mandate that platforms shift from post-sale counterfeit handling to pre-sale risk control, proactively identifying and blocking non-compliant products. Failing to do so exposes platforms to legal and reputational risks, so proactive counterfeit governance is a requirement for compliant operation.

3. Long-term development value: While counterfeit governance may reduce the total number of sellers on a platform in the short term, it boosts platform trust in the long run, attracts brand merchants and high-spending consumers, and helps platforms complete their upgrade to expand long-term growth space. It is a necessary hurdle for platforms looking to scale and become industry leaders.

This industry-wide ramp-up of counterfeit governance reflects new trends in China’s e-commerce sector, and provides valuable new insights for industry research. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New industry trends: China’s e-commerce industry has completed the early stage of volume-driven expansion, and has officially entered a phase focused on trust-building and compliant development. Industry competition has shifted from competing on low prices and traffic volume to competing on consumer trust and regulatory compliance. The space for gray-market operations continues to shrink, and compliance has become an irreversible mainstream trend.

2. A new governance model sample: Pinduoduo’s framework of full-funnel data-driven counterfeit判定and pre-risk security deposit screening, combined with Douyin’s BIC inspection warehouse system, Taobao’s AI-driven intellectual property protection system, and JD.com’s source-side control model, has enriched the business model landscape for e-commerce counterfeit governance, and provided new case studies for research on platform governance.

3. Research implications: For e-commerce platforms to achieve long-term growth and upgrade, they must address the longstanding problem of counterfeit and copycat goods, proactively adapt to regulatory compliance requirements, and purify the platform ecosystem to earn the trust of brands and consumers. This has important reference value for research on platform business model evolution and industrial upgrading paths.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

黄峥:打假,我们一直是特别认真的。

出品 | 电商派Pro作者 | 李响

过去很长一段时间里,电商平台上的山寨商品屡见不鲜。

超熊洗衣液、康帅傅方便面这样的名字,一度成了网络段子里的常客。

起初,大家只觉得好笑,四处转发,却未曾留意,那些被调侃的名字背后,是平台信誉被一点点掏空的事实。

而信任的裂缝一旦出现,电商平台极易陷入困境。

为了活下去,平台只能自己动手,把假货清出去。

近日,拼多多连续发布多项治理公告,内容涉及知名品牌假货治理、山寨商品治理以及品牌商品抽检。

在电商从业者的讨论中,这几份公告被频繁提及,不少人认为这次整治力度明显升级。

据了解,这次整治并非短期动作,而是一次系统性的治理,重点瞄准的是那些长期依赖模糊货源、在标题里打擦边球,并在主图上若隐若现展示知名品牌标识的拼多多商家。

下面我们一起来看看公告的具体内容。

公告显示,平台提出将提高品牌商品的抽检频次和力度。

这句话本身并不新鲜,但此次附带的细节值得关注。

据李响了解,此次抽检重点覆盖运动户外、服饰箱包、美妆个护、食品母婴、玩具模型、数码电器、日化家居等类目,选择这些类目的逻辑很清楚,高风险、高投诉率、高退货率。

这意味着抽检不再是随机撒网,而是根据数据指向问题最集中的区域。

过去很多商家抱有侥幸心理,认为平台商品数量庞大,抽到自己头上的概率不高。现在平台用数据锁定目标,被抽中的可能性大幅上升。

公告对打击行为的界定也更为具体,包括销售假冒注册商标商品、假冒他人厂名厂址、伪造品牌授权或进货凭证,这些属于明确的售假行为。

值得留意的是另外几项,以原单、代购、尾货等名义掩盖售假的行为被列为打击对象。对商品图片进行遮挡、打码来规避平台监管的行为,直接定性为严重违规,从重处理。

这些条款指向的是一类特定的经营手法,商品图上商标位置被贴纸遮挡,或者用马赛克处理,意图绕开平台的图像识别系统。

过去这种方式或许能奏效一段时间,现在平台直接将其定义为严重违规。那些在标题中标注原单、代购、尾货的链接,过去可以用来解释低价和缺少授权的问题,现在这些词语本身就成了风险信号。

山寨商品的治理也类似。公告禁止使用他人品牌的变形词、衍生词或近似Logo,禁止使用与知名品牌相似的商品包装和装潢。

但更关键的是,平台将结合品牌标识、商品外观、交易数据、消费者反馈及售后情况等因素进行综合判断。

综合判断这四个字,压缩了狡辩的空间。

此前一些商家会采取规避策略,标题不写品牌名,主图不放Logo,但整体外观、配色、版式高度模仿知名品牌。

消费者看到之后心领神会,但商家在文字层面似乎没有直接侵权。

现在平台的态度是,不再只看文字层面。消费者是否产生了混淆,售后评价里是否大量提及假货,交易数据是否存在异常,这些叠加起来,就可以作为判定的依据。

这种做法相当于把判定标准从单一的文字比对,扩展到了整个消费链路的数据审查。

公告中还有一项容易被忽略但影响面较大的条款,保证金。

平台表示,对经综合评估存在假货交易风险的店铺,将采取增加保证金的措施。未按要求补缴的,将面临降权甚至更重的处理。

这意味着平台在判定假货之前,就可以基于风险评估要求商家追加保证金。商家面临的选择是,要么追加资金,成本上升,利润空间被压缩,同时意味着后续可能面临更严密的监控;要么不补缴,店铺权重下降,流量锐减。

对于处在灰色地带的商家来说,这个选择本身就构成一道筛选门槛。平台借此让一部分风险较高的商家主动退出。

那么,拼多多为何在此时加大整治力度?原因在于,假货和山寨问题在拼多多沉积已久。

从平台崛起的早期阶段开始,这个标签就一直存在,品牌方对平台缺乏信任,担心入驻后周围充斥着蹭流量和仿冒品。

消费者多次购买后遇到问题,对平台的信任也会被消耗。当用户耐心耗尽,他们会沉默地离开。

拼多多近几年的方向是向上走,引入更多品牌旗舰店,留住消费力更强的用户群体。

如果平台生态中仍然存在大量假货和山寨商品,品牌方和消费者的迁移意愿都会受到影响。

某种程度上,这场治理关系到平台自身的长期空间。

外部监管环境也在收紧,平台责任已从事后处理转向事前风控,要求主动发现问题并在早期进行拦截。

如果不能做到这一点,法律风险和舆论风险都可能升级。

由此可见,拼多多重拳整治假货,势不可挡、迫在眉睫。

把视线放宽到整个电商行业,其实会发现这并非拼多多一家的动作。

抖音电商很早之前就在珠宝、奢侈品、食品等高危类目实行BIC质检仓制度。商家不能直接发货给消费者,必须先送到官方质检仓,一物一检,确认为正品后由官方发出。假货在出货阶段就被物理拦截。

前不久,针对市场中陆续出现的“假洋牌”现象,抖音电商全面升级了跨境品牌资质要求,并对相关商家和商品展开了核实和抽查。

淘宝方面,运行多年的知产保护科技大脑系统,用AI扫描海量商品链接,分析图片指纹、价格异常、物流轨迹和商家关联网络,配合神秘买家抽检机制,每年投入资金进行匿名购买送检,一旦判定售假,直接清退。

至于京东,其自营体系从源头进行管控,采购渠道限定为品牌方或一级授权商。

对第三方商家,京盾系统持续扫描敏感词和异常价格,开出罚单的金额通常较高,包括扣除保证金并追索违约金。

各平台都在用自己的方式收紧对售假行为的管控,依靠原单、尾货、代购等说辞经营的空间正在消失;在主图上遮挡商标就能躲过系统的做法已经失效,被投诉后换个链接重新上架的可能性越来越低。

也有一些商家是受到了上游供货方的误导,供货方声称这批货是代工厂流出的尾货,没有授权但东西是真的。商家采信之后上架销售,结果店铺被查,资金被冻结,货款无法取出。

去申诉时,这些商家往往拿不出品牌授权,也提供不了完整链路的正规进货凭证。平台新规之下,缺少完整的证据链,便很难自证清白。

更关键的是,他们没有从正规渠道进货,没有授权书,售价又远低于市场价,这些事实本身就已经构成了风险。

每一个环节的缺失,最终都指向同一个结论:这门生意从一开始就充满不确定性,翻车几乎是必然的。

就拿拼多多来说,这次整治过后,能够继续经营的商家必然是有品牌授权,有正规进货发票,有完整供应链,商品质量经得起抽检的,不具备这些条件,依靠信息差和平台漏洞存活的商家将面临被清退的风险。

平台的组合策略很清楚。用抽检提高被发现的可能性,用综合判定压缩狡辩空间,用保证金机制促使商家自行选择去留。

想继续留在平台上经营,就必须亮明资质。没有资质的人,只能离场。

那些长期把遮挡商标、仿冒包装、编造货源说辞当作经营常态的商家,在行业规则收紧时,必然会被淘汰。

站在行业角度看,电商经营的透明度在提高,模糊地带在减少。

违规商家已没有钻空子的机会。往后退一步,转向正规产品,去获取授权,去建设供应链,或许是一条活路。但如果继续往前,可能就没有回旋的余地了。

而在这批商家被清退之后,平台生态或许会迎来巨大的改变。

对拼多多等电商平台来说,假货整治是必须跨过去的一道关口。

毕竟,生意不是一场游戏。理清规则之后,经营才能回到产品和服务的本身在,走上真正的正轨。

注:文/李响,文章来源:电商报(公众号ID:kandianshang),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:电商报

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0