广告
加载中

天丝红牛“收权”后:躺不平 卷不动

付艳翠 2026-10-22 14:33
付艳翠 2026/10/22 14:33

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

总1 先分清品牌和版本

1. 天丝与华彬红牛并存,2020年最高法终审明确红牛全系列商标归泰国天丝,但许多消费者仍分不清两个红牛,货架上还有天丝旗下不同版本红牛同柜陈列。

2. 超市可见金色罐装天丝红牛、白罐华彬红牛及金色罐装TCP红色塑膜连包,25.9元6连包促销,普通消费者很难一眼区分。

总2 入局和消费参考

1. 经销商李伟在快消品直播间提醒,天丝红牛除非深耕工厂店等特渠,否则不建议普通经销商入局。

2. 天丝已终止与普盛食品的独家经销合作,收回全国渠道经营权,新框架为养元饮品负责长江以北、广药王老吉负责广东广西湖南海南江西,其余市场直营。

3. 2026年上半年天丝牵手中石化易捷、中国石油零售瞄准加油站场景,但朱丹蓬认为加油站只能作桥头堡,体量有限。

4. 消费者案例显示能量饮料习惯在变化:37岁司机苗丰一月最多喝一瓶,25岁方元今年夏天停喝,认为罐装红牛车上取用不便、夏季常温口感差。

总1 品牌营销与心智

1. 商标官司赢了不等于市场心智迁移,华彬长期把“渴了喝红牛,困了累了更要喝红牛”烙进消费者记忆,朱丹蓬称天丝最大短板是消费者先入为主的心智。

2. 多版本红牛同柜且促销,消费者难分天丝与华彬,品牌辨识和价格促销并未解决终端渗透短板。

总2 渠道、产品与趋势

1. 天丝终止普盛独家经销,转直营并做区域授权:养元长江以北、广药王老吉五省、其余直营;2026上半年牵手中石化易捷和中国石油零售,抢占加油站场景。

2. 产品推“瞬湃乐”维生素电解质饮料,寻求红牛主品牌外第二曲线;近五年在华投入43.6亿元建海南、四川内江、广西南宁三基地,内江设计年产能14.4亿罐。

3. 市场2025至2029预计以10.3%年复合增长率增至1807亿元,百事、元气森林、魔爪都在推新品;东鹏向电竞、户外运动、休闲聚会延伸,天丝需面对品牌固化与用户习惯变化。

总1 政策与合作方式变化

1. 天丝今年6月终止与普盛食品独家经销合作,收回全国渠道经营权,进入直营时代;新框架是养元饮品拿长江以北红牛维生素牛磺酸饮料经销权,广药王老吉负责广东广西湖南海南江西,其余天丝直营。

2. 2026年上半年牵手中石化易捷、中国石油零售,瞄准加油站;原“红牛RedBull官微”更名为“普盛商户”,是合作落幕信号。

总2 机会与风险

1. 风险是天丝2025年在华销售额约20亿至30亿元,华彬红牛、东鹏饮料已跨入200亿级别;多经销商分片操盘难以下沉做终端精细化,下沉夫妻店需人海战术,天丝难承担庞大人力管理成本。

2. 机会是能量饮料2025至2029预计年复合增长10.3%至1807亿元,电解质新品可作第二曲线,加油站和工厂店等特渠可试;可学习点是从单一总代转向多主体分区试错,借合作方网络铺货,但朱丹蓬不看好其能大幅反弹。

总1 产能与产品生产

1. 天丝近五年在华累计投入43.6亿元,建成海南、四川内江、广西南宁三大生产基地,内江基地设计年产能14.4亿罐,显示功能饮料仍有产能加码。

2. 产品端推“瞬湃乐”维生素电解质饮料,市场上还有低糖含气、含人参、维生素B6、烟酰胺、茶氨酸、咖啡因、燕窝酸等成分的新品,工厂可关注电解质和成分化产品设计。

总2 商业机会与设计启示

1. 渠道收权、区域代理和加油站特渠会带来铺货与生产配套需求;能量饮料市场预计2025至2029年复合增长10.3%至1807亿元,百事、元气森林、魔爪等入局带来代工和新品机会。

2. 消费案例提示产品设计要关注车载取用和口感稳定:25岁司机方元称罐装红牛放车上取用不便,夏天晒到常温口感大打折扣;包装形态和便携性会影响复购。

3. 电商和会员店上新可参考百事在电商上线“唤能”、元气森林在山姆推“唤醒力”,工厂可配合新品快速上新和渠道定制。

总1 行业趋势与客户痛点

1. 能量饮料仍在增长,弗若斯特沙利文预计2025至2029年以10.3%年复合增长率增至1807亿元;但马上赢监测显示2025年东鹏、华彬、天丝、中沃、达利五集团约占93%份额,格局板结。

2. 天丝的核心痛点不是渠道和产品,而是消费者心智壁垒;同时终端下沉难,县镇便利店、街边夫妻店需要人海战术维护,多经销商分片难做精细化运营,加油站体量有限。

总2 可关注的服务方向

1. 针对心智问题,需要品牌辨识、消费者教育和终端陈列区分,避免多版本红牛同柜让消费者混淆。

2. 针对渠道问题,可提供下沉网点维护、终端客情、特渠场景运营和区域经销协同方案;文章显示天丝以养元、广药王老吉和直营分区试错。

3. 产品创新上可关注电解质饮料、低糖含气、人参等成分趋势,以及东鹏向电竞、户外运动、休闲聚会扩展场景的做法,为品牌提供差异化产品与场景营销服务。

总1 平台渠道与招商机会

1. 天丝2026年上半年牵手中石化易捷、中国石油零售,瞄准加油站场景;百事在电商上线“唤能”能量可乐型汽水,元气森林在山姆推“唤醒力”,说明加油站、电商、会员店都可成为能量饮料上新和招商场景。

2. 天丝终止普盛独家经销后,形成养元饮品长江以北、广药王老吉五省、其余直营的渠道框架,平台方可关注区域代理和直营体系的入驻合作。

总2 运营管理与风向规避

1. 多款红牛同柜陈列,金色罐天丝、白罐华彬、金色TCP连包等让消费者难区分,25.9元6连包促销虽能拉动走货,但暴露终端渗透和品牌辨识问题,平台运营需做好版本标注和陈列管理。

2. 风险在于天丝2025年销售额仅20亿至30亿元,华彬、东鹏已到200亿级别;朱丹蓬认为多经销商分片难精细化、加油站体量有限,平台招商应规避过度依赖单一品牌,关注能量饮料五集团约93%份额的固化格局及新品入局带来的增量。

总1 产业新动向与市场格局

1. 红牛商标权属2020年最高法终审归天丝,但华彬长期运营形成的消费心智未随判决迁移,天丝手握商标却市场表现低迷,2025年在华销售额约20亿至30亿元,华彬和东鹏已到200亿级别。

2. 天丝今年6月收回普盛独家经销权转直营,又做养元、广药王老吉分区代理和加油站特渠,推“瞬湃乐”电解质新品;能量饮料2025至2029预计年复合增长10.3%至1807亿元,五集团约占93%份额,百事、元气森林、魔爪等入局。

总2 新问题与商业模式启示

1. 新问题是商标所有权与市场认知分离、授权年限分歧曾出现20年与50年之争,后发者面临心智壁垒和下沉终端高成本。

2. 商业模式从单一总代转向多主体分区试错加直营加特渠,但朱丹蓬认为多经销商分片不符合快消底层运营逻辑,难做终端精细化,加油站只能作桥头堡。

3. 案例上,37岁苗丰减少能量饮料、25岁方元从东鹏转停喝,显示消费习惯和健康顾虑会改变品类需求,为研究功能饮料用户迁移提供微观样本。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

Summary 1: First, distinguish the brand from its versions

1. Tiansi and Huabin Red Bull coexist. In 2020, the Supreme People's Court's final ruling confirmed that the full Red Bull trademark series belongs to Thailand's Tiansi, but many consumers still cannot tell the two Red Bulls apart. Shelves even display different Tiansi Red Bull versions in the same cabinet.

2. Supermarkets show gold-canned Tiansi Red Bull, white-canned Huabin Red Bull, and gold-canned TCP red-film multipacks, with a promotional price of RMB 25.9 for a six-pack; ordinary consumers find it hard to distinguish them at a glance.

Summary 2: Market entry and consumption references

1. Distributor Li Wei warned in a fast-moving consumer goods livestream that unless Tiansi Red Bull deeply cultivates special channels such as factory stores, ordinary distributors are not advised to enter.

2. Tiansi has terminated its exclusive distribution partnership with Pusheng Food, reclaimed nationwide channel operating rights, and adopted a new framework: Yangyuan Beverage covers the area north of the Yangtze River; GPHL Wanglaoji covers Guangdong, Guangxi, Hunan, Hainan, and Jiangxi; the remaining markets are direct-run.

3. In the first half of 2026, Tiansi will partner with Sinopec EasyJoy and PetroChina Retail to target gas-station scenarios, but Zhu Danpeng believes gas stations can only serve as bridgeheads and have limited scale.

4. Consumer cases show changing energy-drink habits: 37-year-old driver Miao Feng drinks at most one bottle a month, while 25-year-old Fang Yuan stopped drinking this summer, citing the inconvenience of taking canned Red Bull in a car and poor taste at room temperature in summer.

Summary 1: Brand marketing and consumer mindshare

1. Winning the trademark lawsuit does not mean market mindshare has shifted. Huabin long burned “Thirsty? Drink Red Bull; tired? You need Red Bull even more” into consumer memory, and Zhu Danpeng says Tiansi's biggest weakness is consumers' first-mover mindshare.

2. Multiple Red Bull versions sit in the same cabinet and are promoted together, making it hard for consumers to distinguish Tiansi from Huabin. Brand recognition and price promotions have not solved the weakness in terminal penetration.

Summary 2: Channels, products, and trends

1. Tiansi terminated Pusheng's exclusive distribution, shifted to direct operation, and made regional authorizations: Yangyuan north of the Yangtze River, GPHL Wanglaoji in five provinces, and direct operation elsewhere; in the first half of 2026 it partnered with Sinopec EasyJoy and PetroChina Retail to seize gas-station scenarios.

2. It launched Shunpaile vitamin electrolyte drink to seek a second curve beyond the main Red Bull brand; over the past five years it invested RMB 4.36 billion in three bases in Hainan, Neijiang in Sichuan, and Nanning in Guangxi, with the Neijiang base designed for annual capacity of 1.44 billion cans.

3. The market is expected to grow from 2025 to 2029 at a 10.3% CAGR to RMB 180.7 billion, with Pepsi, Genki Forest, and Monster all launching new products; Dongpeng is extending into esports, outdoor sports, and casual gatherings, and Tiansi must confront brand rigidification and changing user habits.

Summary 1: Changes in policy and cooperation models

1. In June this year, Tiansi terminated its exclusive distribution cooperation with Pusheng Food, reclaimed nationwide channel operating rights, and entered a direct-operation era; under the new framework, Yangyuan Beverage obtains distribution rights for Red Bull vitamin taurine drinks north of the Yangtze River, GPHL Wanglaoji is responsible for Guangdong, Guangxi, Hunan, Hainan, and Jiangxi, and Tiansi directly operates the rest.

2. In the first half of 2026, it partnered with Sinopec EasyJoy and PetroChina Retail to target gas stations; the original “Red Bull RedBull official WeChat” was renamed “Pusheng Merchant,” a signal that the partnership has ended.

Summary 2: Opportunities and risks

1. The risk is that Tiansi's 2025 China sales are about RMB 2–3 billion, while Huabin Red Bull and Dongpeng Beverage have already reached the RMB 20 billion level; multiple distributors operating in patches make it difficult to go deep into lower-tier terminals, and lower-tier mom-and-pop stores require a manpower-intensive approach, making it hard for Tiansi to bear huge human-resource management costs.

2. The opportunity is that energy drinks are expected to grow at a 10.3% CAGR from 2025 to 2029 to RMB 180.7 billion; electrolyte new products can serve as a second curve, and special channels such as gas stations and factory stores can be tested; the lesson is to move from a single master distributor to multi-entity regional experimentation, using partners' networks to distribute, though Zhu Danpeng is not optimistic about a major rebound.

Summary 1: Capacity and product manufacturing

1. Over the past five years, Tiansi has invested a cumulative RMB 4.36 billion in China and built three major production bases in Hainan, Neijiang in Sichuan, and Nanning in Guangxi; the Neijiang base is designed for annual capacity of 1.44 billion cans, showing that functional drinks are still adding capacity.

2. On the product side, it launched Shunpaile vitamin electrolyte drink; the market also has new products with low sugar and carbonation, ginseng, vitamin B6, niacinamide, theanine, caffeine, and sialic acid, and factories can pay attention to electrolyte and ingredient-focused product design.

Summary 2: Business opportunities and design implications

1. Channel centralization, regional agents, and gas-station special channels will create distribution and production-support demand; the energy-drink market is expected to grow at a 10.3% CAGR from 2025 to 2029 to RMB 180.7 billion, and entries by Pepsi, Genki Forest, Monster, and others bring OEM and new-product opportunities.

2. Consumer cases suggest product design should address in-car use and taste stability: 25-year-old driver Fang Yuan says canned Red Bull is inconvenient to use in a car, and in summer it is exposed to room temperature and its taste suffers greatly; packaging format and portability affect repurchase.

3. E-commerce and membership-store launches can reference Pepsi's “Huaneng” on e-commerce and Genki Forest's “Waking Power” at Sam's Club; factories can support rapid new-product launches and channel customization.

Summary 1: Industry trends and client pain points

1. Energy drinks are still growing; Frost & Sullivan expects a 10.3% CAGR from 2025 to 2029 to RMB 180.7 billion; however, Mashangying monitoring shows that in 2025 Dongpeng, Huabin, Tiansi, Zhongwo, and Dali—five groups—will account for about 93% share, indicating a rigid landscape.

2. Tiansi's core pain point is not channels and products but consumer mindshare barriers; at the same time, terminal penetration into lower tiers is difficult—county and township convenience stores and street mom-and-pop stores require manpower-intensive maintenance, multiple distributors in patches make fine-grained operations difficult, and gas stations have limited scale.

Summary 2: Service directions to watch

1. To address mindshare issues, services are needed for brand recognition, consumer education, and differentiated terminal display, avoiding consumer confusion from multiple Red Bull versions in the same cabinet.

2. To address channel issues, providers can offer lower-tier outlet maintenance, terminal relationship management, special-channel scenario operations, and regional distributor coordination solutions; the article shows Tiansi is experimenting with Yangyuan, GPHL Wanglaoji, and direct-operation zones.

3. On product innovation, providers can watch electrolyte drinks, low-sugar carbonated products, and ginseng and other ingredient trends, as well as Dongpeng's expansion into esports, outdoor sports, and casual gatherings, to offer brands differentiated products and scenario marketing services.

Summary 1: Platform channels and merchant recruitment opportunities

1. In the first half of 2026, Tiansi will partner with Sinopec EasyJoy and PetroChina Retail to target gas-station scenarios; Pepsi launched “Huaneng” energy cola-type soda on e-commerce, and Genki Forest launched “Waking Power” at Sam's Club, showing that gas stations, e-commerce, and membership stores can all become scenarios for energy-drink launches and merchant recruitment.

2. After Tiansi terminated Pusheng's exclusive distribution, it formed a channel framework with Yangyuan Beverage north of the Yangtze River, GPHL Wanglaoji in five provinces, and direct operation elsewhere; platforms can watch for onboarding cooperation with regional agents and the direct-operation system.

Summary 2: Operations management and trend risk avoidance

1. Multiple Red Bull products are displayed in the same cabinet—gold-canned Tiansi, white-canned Huabin, gold TCP multipacks, etc.—making it hard for consumers to distinguish them. Although the RMB 25.9 six-pack promotion can drive sales, it exposes terminal penetration and brand-recognition problems; platform operations need proper version labeling and display management.

2. The risk is that Tiansi's 2025 sales are only RMB 2–3 billion, while Huabin and Dongpeng have reached the RMB 20 billion level; Zhu Danpeng believes multiple distributors in patches make fine-grained operations difficult and gas stations have limited scale. Platform merchant recruitment should avoid over-reliance on a single brand and watch the rigid structure in which the five energy-drink groups hold about 93% share, as well as incremental opportunities from new entrants.

Summary 1: New industry developments and market landscape

1. The Supreme People's Court's 2020 final ruling assigned Red Bull trademark ownership to Tiansi, but the consumer mindshare formed by Huabin's long-term operation did not shift with the ruling. Tiansi holds the trademark yet performs weakly in the market, with 2025 China sales of about RMB 2–3 billion, while Huabin and Dongpeng have reached the RMB 20 billion level.

2. In June this year, Tiansi reclaimed Pusheng's exclusive distribution rights and shifted to direct operation, while also setting up regional agents with Yangyuan and GPHL Wanglaoji and special gas-station channels, and launching the Shunpaile electrolyte new product; energy drinks are expected to grow at a 10.3% CAGR from 2025 to 2029 to RMB 180.7 billion, the five groups hold about 93% share, and Pepsi, Genki Forest, Monster, and others are entering.

Summary 2: New questions and business-model implications

1. The new question is the separation between trademark ownership and market perception; the dispute over authorization terms once involved a 20-year versus 50-year debate, and latecomers face mindshare barriers and high costs of penetrating lower-tier terminals.

2. The business model has shifted from a single master distributor to multi-entity regional experimentation plus direct operation plus special channels, but Zhu Danpeng believes that multiple distributors operating in patches does not fit the underlying operating logic of fast-moving consumer goods, makes fine-grained terminal operations difficult, and gas stations can only serve as bridgeheads.

3. In cases, 37-year-old Miao Feng has reduced energy drinks, and 25-year-old Fang Yuan stopped drinking after switching from Dongpeng, showing that consumption habits and health concerns can change category demand; this provides micro-samples for research on functional-drink user migration.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

“天丝红牛也就能量饮料卖得还行,但除非深耕工厂店等特渠,否则不建议普通经销商入局。”在快消品直播间里,经销商李伟强调道。

手握正统红牛商标、打赢漫长的商标权属官司,天丝红牛却始终没能在中国功能饮料主流市场站稳脚跟。不甘心就此被动掉队,今年天丝集团动作密集,开启一场大刀阔斧的自救。

今年6月,品牌正式终止和普盛食品的独家经销合作,收回全国渠道经营权,全面迈入直营时代。

产能端持续重金加码,近五年在华累计投入43.6亿元,建成海南、四川内江、广西南宁三大生产基地,仅内江基地设计年产能便达14.4亿罐。

渠道上另辟赛道,2026年上半年牵手中石化易捷、中国石油零售,瞄准加油站场景抢占点位;产品创新方面,天丝红牛还推出新品“瞬湃乐”维生素电解质饮料,希望在红牛主品牌之外,搭建第二条增长曲线。

只是,轰轰烈烈的转型自救背后,横在天丝红牛面前的,仍是一道道难以逾越的市场难关。

01 “后进生”天丝红牛

在东鹏饮料“累了困了,喝东鹏特饮”这句口号席卷下沉市场之前,“渴了喝红牛,困了累了更要喝红牛”是刻在几代国人记忆里的经典广告语。

九十年代末到2000年代,电视广告里金罐亮眼的红牛闯入大众视野。

彼时,读书熬夜备考、长途货车赶路、户外干活提神,金罐红牛就是硬通货。不少人的初体验,是长辈递来的这一小罐金色饮料,带着微酸的甜,喝下后期待那份提神的力量。

37岁的货车司机苗丰对此印象深刻,初中便跟着父亲跑车的他,早年无数个熬夜赶路的夜晚,都是靠一罐红牛撑过疲惫,这罐微酸回甘的金色饮料,是他青春与奔波路上最深刻的消费记忆。

这份全民记忆的背后,是红牛入华初期一段默契的跨界合作。

1975年泰国天丝集团创立红牛品牌、手握核心商标与配方,但早期迟迟无法突破中国市场准入壁垒、缺少本土化运营能力。

1995年,天丝创始人许书标与华彬集团严彬达成合作,双方成立合资公司,开启长达二十年的分工模式:天丝出商标、出配方、握品牌所有权,华彬负责全部本土化运营、渠道铺设、广告教育与市场落地。

靠着这套模式,红牛顺利拿下国内生产经营资质,正式扎根中国市场。

在合作蜜月期里,双方各司其职、携手做大品类蛋糕。

但裂痕早已暗中滋生,2012年红牛创始人许书标离世,天丝集团由其子许馨雄接手,新管理层开始重新审视中国市场权益,双方在利润分配、业务归属、市场管控上的矛盾持续激化。

天丝方面认为合资公司长期未规范分红、存在业务与利润转移问题;双方对授权年限更是产生根本性分歧:天丝依据工商备案合同认定20年商标授权2016年到期终止,华彬则主张存在50年合作协议,享有长期独家经营权。

2016年商标许可到期,天丝正式宣布不再续约,持续数年的红牛商标大战全面爆发,昔日合作伙伴彻底对簿公堂。2020年最高法终审落槌,明确红牛全系列商标所有权归属于泰国天丝集团,为这场旷日持久的权属之争画上法律句号。

但二十多年间,华彬把这句slogan深深烙进消费者心智,数百万城乡夫妻店、小卖部的货架上,金罐红牛常年占据显眼位置。

这份根植于记忆里的红牛认知,也成了如今天丝最难翻越的高墙。

虽然商标官司尘埃落定,品牌归属有了法律定论,但藏在大众脑海中的童年记忆和消费惯性,不会跟着判决书轻易改变。

很多消费者分不清天丝红牛、华彬红牛的差别,在他们心中,从小喝到大的那罐红牛,早已和旧记忆绑定。

“从小超市货架上看到的红牛就是这一款,喝了十几年,即便货架上有不同版本的红牛,我也根本分不清区别。”不少普通消费者坦言,在日常消费认知里,从来没有“两个红牛”的概念。

正如朱丹蓬表示,天丝最大短板不是渠道、不是产品,而是消费者先入为主的消费心智。

华彬红牛长期深耕国内市场,终端服务体系成熟、团队执行力强、终端客情稳固,在消费者心中已经形成固有认知。

朱丹蓬认为,即便天丝手握红牛商标、拥有两款红牛产品在国内销售,整体业绩依旧持续低迷。心智壁垒一旦形成,后期抢夺市场蛋糕难度极高。也正是看到红牛主品牌突围难度大,天丝开始布局其他新品类,并将其作为重要备选方案。

一纸判决拿回商标,却难以夺回刻在一代人记忆里的消费心智,天丝的自救突围,似乎从一开始就要翻越一道看不见的高墙。

02 渠道“收权”

与华彬决裂之后,急于夺回国内功能饮料市场话语权的天丝,选择牵手普盛食品。

普盛核心团队脱胎于原华彬红牛,手握成熟的功能饮料操盘经验。但这份曾经在华彬体系里验证过的经验,并没有帮天丝红牛深耕市场,多年下来,市场表现始终不及预期。

渠道混战,更是这场市场博弈的缩影。

在超市的保健食品专区,多款红牛产品并排陈列:金色罐装的红牛维生素牛磺酸饮料(天丝红牛)、白罐红牛维生素功能饮料(华彬红牛),还有金色罐装的TCP红色塑膜连包(天丝原厂授权红牛),标价牌上25.9元6连包的促销价摆在显眼位置。

多款产品一起,普通消费者很难一眼区分天丝旗下不同版本红牛,更难分辨它与昔日华彬红牛的差别。多种SKU同柜陈列,也侧面反映天丝依靠多产品、价格促销拉动终端走货的思路,但热闹的货架背后,却难掩终端渗透的短板。

天丝与普盛的合作在短暂蜜月期过后,矛盾不断累积、积怨渐深。为改变单一总代的局面,天丝陆续放出区域经销授权,引入养元饮品和广药王老吉,分片操盘区域市场,持续压缩普盛的经营空间,双方的合作最终走向破裂。

2026年9月23日下午,原“红牛RedBull官微”服务号正式更名为“普盛商户”,账号头像也从标志性斗牛logo更换为“PSF”标识,成为双方合作落幕的一个标志性信号。

在行业视角下,这场渠道收权的变革,更多是业绩压力倒逼而来的被动调整。据行业估算,2025年天丝红牛在华全年销售额仅20亿至30亿元区间,而华彬红牛、东鹏饮料的营收都已经跨入200亿级别,体量差距悬殊。

新渠道框架中,天丝将国内市场划分为三大板块:养元饮品拿下红牛维生素牛磺酸饮料长江以北经销权;广药王老吉负责广东、广西、湖南、海南、江西区域;其余市场由天丝直营。

天丝希望摆脱对单一总代的强绑定,通过多主体分区域试错,借力合作方现成的经销商网络快速铺货,加快市场渗透。

在朱丹蓬看来,这套渠道拆分方案的设计想法很直观,就是依托合作方原有资源,最大化释放各方渠道优势。

但在他的判断里,这种模式并不契合国内快消行业底层运营逻辑。多家大经销商分片操盘,很难下沉做到终端精细化运营。

朱丹蓬并不看好这套新架构,认为其很难拉动天丝红牛销量大幅反弹,“想要依靠这套方案实现销量东山再起,难度极大。”

他直言,加油站渠道虽被天丝选为直营突破口,但仅仅只能作为市场桥头堡,整体体量有限,难以撑起整体大盘。而县镇便利店、街边夫妻店构成的下沉终端,是快消行业的“渠道细胞”,也是维持市场基本盘的微循环网络。

想要覆盖海量基层网点,需要依靠人海战术持续维护终端客情。以天丝红牛当前的销售体量,难以承担随之而来庞大人力与管理成本,短期内,根本无法补齐和华彬红牛数百万终端网点之间的巨大差距。

多方分片代理的渠道改革,看似打破了单一总代的桎梏,却依旧难以补上下沉终端的短板,天丝想要追赶华彬搭建多年的渠道护城河,依旧长路漫漫。

03 错失黄金十年

功能性饮料市场竞争格局,早已在天丝红牛缺位的那些年里发生深刻变化。

长达数年的红牛商标权属拉锯战,给了东鹏特饮、乐虎、魔爪等竞品趁势突围的窗口期。其中东鹏饮料凭借大单品东鹏特饮快速做大,成长为国内功能饮料行业首家实现“A+H”股双重上市的企业。

“在中国功能饮料的黄金十年,东鹏饮料抓住机会高速扩张、抢占市场,而天丝红牛没能抓住行业红利,错失最重要的增长窗口期。如今功能饮料赛道已经进入品牌固化阶段,天丝想要实现翻盘难度极大。”朱丹蓬直言。

货车司机是能量饮料的核心消费群体,市场的变化也直接体现在他们的消费选择上。苗丰已经在主动减少能量饮料的摄入,“总喝饮料身体不好,现在一个月最多喝一瓶,更多的时候靠嗑瓜子解困。”

25岁的货车司机方元的消费经历,更是赛道变迁一个鲜活的微观缩影。

“我2022年那会儿就开始喝能量饮料,今年夏天开始慢慢就不喝了。”方元回忆,此前跑车,东鹏特饮是他的首选,红牛反倒喝得很少,“一天1、2瓶,那真是没少喝。”

之所以很少选择红牛,在他看来,罐装红牛放置在车上,取用并不方便。

这份持续数年的饮用习惯,在今年夏天戛然而止。倒不全是出于对健康的顾虑,更多是喝腻了,“喝够了吧。再加上夏天饮料放在车内被晒到常温,口感也大打折扣。”

现在方元不再跑长途货运,主要跑北京周边短途线路。困意来袭,他有了更温和的应对方式:听听音乐提神,实在疲惫就靠边停车短暂小憩,不再依赖功能饮料硬撑。

在他看来,这类功能性饮品不宜多喝,长期饮用会给身体带来负担。

当然,整个赛道依旧保持增长活力,但行业的竞争也注定变得更加激烈。

弗若斯特沙利文报告指出,2025-2029年,中国能量饮料市场预计以10.3%的年复合增长率增长至1807亿元。巨大的市场空间,还在持续吸引外部巨头入局。

今年3月,百事饮料在电商上线了一款名为“唤能(Sting)”新品,标签显示为“能量可乐型汽水”,并强调含有人参、维生素B6、烟酰胺这些多见于能量饮料的成分。

元气森林也在山姆推出了能量饮料新品牌“唤醒力”。该产品为低糖含气配方,主打成分包括茶氨酸、咖啡因、燕窝酸及人参粉。

背靠可口可乐的魔爪饮料也向中国导入了新品,其葡萄口味“紫色魔爪”凭借包装颜值在社交媒体引发一波讨论。

在此背景下,天丝红牛也试图跳出传统金罐能量饮料的内卷,推出新品“瞬湃乐”维生素电解质饮料,布局电解质细分赛道寻找第二增长曲线。

但赛道里的传统头部玩家同样没有停下扩张脚步。以东鹏饮料为例,在巩固货车、体力劳动者等基本盘之外,也瞄准消费人群日常化、年轻化的大趋势,将触角延伸至电竞、户外运动、休闲聚会等新兴场景,不断拓宽产品矩阵与用户边界。

马上赢线下监测数据显示,2025年国内能量饮料市场,东鹏、华彬、天丝、中沃、达利五大集团合计占据约93%的销售份额。赛道格局已然板结,即便手握商标、加码新品,天丝红牛想要抢回失去的市场,前路并非坦途。

注:文/付艳翠,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:创业最前线

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

天丝红牛为什么收回全国渠道经营权?

天丝红牛于2026年6月终止与普盛食品的独家经销合作,收回全国渠道经营权,全面转向直营。直接原因是与普盛合作矛盾累积,单一总代模式未达预期;深层原因是2025年在华销售额仅20亿至30亿元,与华彬红牛、东鹏饮料200亿级体量差距明显,业绩压力倒逼渠道调整。

天丝红牛与华彬红牛有什么区别?

天丝红牛由泰国天丝集团持有红牛商标和配方,2020年最高法终审确认全系列商标归天丝;华彬红牛由华彬集团长期负责本土化运营,渠道和消费者心智更强。产品上,天丝有金罐红牛维生素牛磺酸饮料,华彬有白罐红牛维生素功能饮料。天丝在华销售额约20亿至30亿元,华彬已跨入200亿级别。

天丝红牛目前在中国市场规模多大?

行业估算,2025年天丝红牛在华全年销售额仅20亿至30亿元,而华彬红牛、东鹏饮料营收均已进入200亿级别。产能方面,天丝近五年在华累计投入43.6亿元,建成海南、四川内江、广西南宁三大生产基地,其中内江基地设计年产能14.4亿罐。

中国能量饮料市场未来几年增长趋势如何?

弗若斯特沙利文报告指出,2025—2029年中国能量饮料市场预计以10.3%的年复合增长率增长,到2029年市场规模达1807亿元。市场仍在增长,但百事、元气森林、魔爪等外部巨头持续入局,东鹏等头部品牌也在扩场景,竞争将更激烈。

天丝红牛渠道改革后如何划分中国市场?

天丝红牛将中国市场划分为三大板块:养元饮品取得红牛维生素牛磺酸饮料长江以北经销权;广药王老吉负责广东、广西、湖南、海南、江西区域;其余市场由天丝直营。同时,天丝牵手易捷、中国石油零售,瞄准加油站场景抢占点位。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

赞 +1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0