广告
加载中

美国直播电商持续升温 但可能不是你熟悉的样子

韩笑 2026-09-10 16:41
韩笑 2026/09/10 16:41

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章清晰梳理了美国直播电商的真实发展现状、与中国市场的核心差异,能帮大家建立对海外直播赛道的准确认知,避开信息差带来的误区。

1. 核心发展数据:据eMarketer预测,今年美国直播购物销售额将接近200亿美元,同比增长约35%,规模是2024年的两倍以上;TikTok Shop美区2026年上半年直播业务销售额同比翻倍,直播场次增长超60%,总时长增长超80%,但对比中国2026年预计超1.1万亿美元的直播电商规模仍有极大差距,目前美区TikTok Shop的GMV中直播仅占14%,远低于短视频、商城与搜索的贡献。

2. 实用认知参考:美国消费者反感直播硬推销、逼单,更偏爱有娱乐性、社交互动感的内容,购物只是看内容时顺带的行为;当地直播人力成本约为国内的7倍,单小时主播报价110至150美元,测试直播赛道至少要投入1.2万至1.5万美元,普通人或小团队入局不要盲目照搬国内打法,要提前算好成本、适配当地用户习惯。

文章披露了美国直播电商赛道的增长态势、用户消费特征与标杆品牌实操案例,对计划布局美区市场的品牌有明确的营销与渠道参考价值。

1. 消费趋势与用户行为:美国直播电商正处于高速增长期,今年行业销售额预计近200亿美元,同比增长35%,但当地消费者对硬推销、逼单类内容接受度极低,更青睐兼具娱乐性、社交互动属性的直播内容,购物是内容体验的自然延伸,目前平台直播流量以自然流量为主,硬广投放效果相对有限。

2. 渠道建设参考:TikTok Shop是美区直播电商的核心增长阵地,今年平台大力扶持竞拍模式,已有多个品牌跑出成绩:发型工具品牌Beachwaver靠数百场直播累计在平台实现百万美元销售额,单场4小时直播通过限量拍卖、产品演示、互动福利完成8000美元销售额;完成破产重组的传统品牌QVC靠开设24/7直播频道、多账号周播超200小时,一年新增超百万平台客户,成为平台表现最好的商家类型之一。品牌入局不要照搬国内高密度转化打法,要靠娱乐化内容、长期信任搭建承接转化。

文章拆解了美国直播电商赛道的增长机会、平台扶持方向、入局风险与实操要点,对跨境出海卖家有直接的决策参考价值。

1. 机会提示与平台风向:美国直播电商是明确的高增长赛道,今年规模预计近200亿美元同比增35%,TikTok Shop美区2026年上半年直播销售额同比翻倍,今年平台大力扶持竞拍模式,赛道参与者持续增多;除了跨境商家,本土新锐品牌、转型数字化的传统零售品牌都拿到了不错的结果,收藏品、潮玩等小众垂类也有很大机会,比如Whatnot靠“直播展销+垂直兴趣社区”模式做到年GMV80亿美元,估值达200亿美元。

2. 风险提示与实操建议:目前美区TikTok Shop的GMV中直播仅占14%,贡献远低于短视频和商城搜索,不要把全部资源押注直播;当地主播人力成本约为国内的7倍,单小时报价110至150美元,测试直播赛道至少要准备1.2万至1.5万美元启动资金,中小卖家要评估自身承受力;不要照搬国内逼单、硬推的打法,要主打娱乐性、互动性内容,靠长期用户信任承接转化,优先布局自然流量。

文章梳理了美国直播电商赛道的热卖品类、消费偏好与渠道结构特征,能为计划布局跨境出海的生产型企业提供产品设计、渠道布局的明确方向。

1. 可抓的商业机会:美国直播电商正高速增长,今年行业规模近200亿美元同比增35%,TikTok Shop等平台今年重点扶持竞拍模式,目前已跑出的热卖品类涵盖饰品、玩偶、美妆、发型造型工具、收藏品、潮玩等,其中具备新奇属性、适合现场互动展示、有竞拍吸引力的产品尤其适配直播玩法,工厂可针对性开发匹配美区消费者需求的相关品类,对接赛道商家的供应链需求。

2. 数字化与电商布局启示:美国直播的核心逻辑不是高密度推销,而是靠娱乐性、互动性内容吸引用户停留,购物是内容体验的自然延伸,工厂布局美区电商渠道时,产品设计要突出可视化强、有话题感、适合演示互动的特征,不要照搬国内直播的极致性价比、强促销的选品逻辑;同时要注意渠道结构,目前美区TikTok Shop中短视频、商城搜索贡献了86%的GMV,直播仅占14%,要适配多渠道的产品需求,不要单一押注直播渠道。

文章梳理了美国直播电商的行业发展趋势、参与玩家结构与商家核心痛点,对服务跨境出海群体的服务商有明确的业务方向指引。

1. 行业发展趋势:美国直播电商正处于快速扩容阶段,今年行业规模预计近200亿美元同比增35%,TikTok Shop等核心平台的直播业务年增速超100%,今年平台重点扶持竞拍模式;当前赛道参与者涵盖中国跨境卖家、美国本土新锐品牌、转型数字化的传统零售品牌、垂类兴趣直播平台,不同类型的玩家都有直播相关的服务需求,整体服务市场空间随赛道增长持续扩大。

2. 客户痛点与解决方案方向:目前入局美区直播的商家普遍面临三类核心痛点:一是不熟悉本土用户偏好,照搬国内硬推、逼单打法适配性差,不了解当地内容要兼顾娱乐性、社交属性的要求;二是本土主播人力成本高,单小时报价110至150美元,单赛道测试成本超1.2万美元,中小商家难以承担;三是直播硬广投放效果有限,流量以自然流量为主,商家缺乏成熟的自然流量运营方法。服务商可围绕本土化内容策划、高性价比主播资源对接、自然流量运营等方向打造服务产品。

文章披露了美国直播电商的生态特征、现有平台政策效果、不同类型商家的表现与用户偏好,对布局直播电商业务的平台有运营与招商层面的参考价值。

1. 现有平台做法的效果参考:TikTok Shop美区从跳转独立站的半闭环模式转向站内闭环成交、从定向邀约制转为全面开放后,直播业务实现高速增长,2026年上半年直播销售额同比翻倍,直播场次增长超60%,总直播时长增长超80%;今年重点扶持的竞拍模式有效调动了商家参与积极性,有商家单靠竞拍玩法单场实现2000美元销售额;引入传统零售品牌的策略效果突出,比如转型数字化的QVC上线24/7直播频道后年增百万客户,经平台战略业务负责人确认,这类传统品牌已经成为平台表现最好的商家类型之一。

2. 运营与招商优化方向:招商端可重点覆盖三类商家,一是产品适配互动竞拍玩法的饰品、潮玩、美妆、家居工具类商家,二是有成熟直播运营经验的传统零售品牌,三是垂类兴趣领域的社区型商家;运营端要贴合当地用户反感硬推销、偏好娱乐社交内容的特征,引导商家产出高互动性内容,不要直接照搬国内高密度转化的直播规则;同时要完善渠道结构,目前直播在美区GMV占比仅14%,要同步建设短视频、商城搜索等多类交易触点。

文章结合多源行业数据、从业者一手访谈与典型企业案例,呈现了美国直播电商的发展阶段、核心特征与中美产业差异,为直播电商的跨文化比较、产业演化研究提供了实证素材。

1. 产业新动向与商业模式特征:美国直播电商已进入高速增长期,今年行业销售额近200亿美元同比增35%,但整体仍处于发展早期,TikTok Shop美区的GMV中直播仅占14%,贡献远低于短视频、商城与搜索;当前赛道已演化出多元商业模式,既有综合内容平台搭建闭环电商体系开展直播带货,也有Whatnot这类从收藏品、潮玩垂类切入,靠“直播展销+垂直兴趣社区”模式做到年GMV80亿美元、估值200亿美元的垂类平台,传统电视购物品牌也在向数字化直播转型,成为平台核心商家群体。

2. 值得研究的核心问题:中美直播电商的核心差异不只是市场规模(2026年中国市场规模预计超1.1万亿美元,美国仅200亿美元),更根植于文化土壤与消费习惯的本质区别:中国直播是高密度交易转化场,核心是缩短链路提升购买效率,美国直播是娱乐内容与兴趣社区的延伸,用户为互动、陪伴停留,购物是内容体验的自然结果;同时美国直播人力成本是国内的7倍,硬广投放效果有限,其生态演化路径不能简单套用中国市场的发展经验。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article provides a clear, fact-based overview of the current state of live commerce in the U.S. and its core differences from the Chinese market, helping readers build an accurate understanding of the overseas live shopping space and avoid misconceptions driven by information gaps.

1. Key market metrics: Per eMarketer forecasts, U.S. live shopping sales will approach $20 billion this year, up roughly 35% year over year and more than double the 2024 figure. On TikTok Shop U.S., live commerce GMV doubled year over year in the first half of 2026, with the number of live streams rising over 60% and total broadcast duration up over 80%. Even so, the market remains drastically smaller than China’s projected 2026 live commerce scale of over $11 trillion. Currently, live streams account for only 14% of TikTok Shop U.S.’s total GMV, far lower than the contribution from short videos, in-app mall, and search.

2. Practical takeaways for awareness: U.S. consumers dislike hard-sell tactics and pressure-driven closing in live streams; they prefer entertaining, socially interactive content, with purchases treated as a secondary, impulsive decision while viewing content. Local live streaming labor costs are roughly 7 times those in China, with hourly host rates ranging from $110 to $150, and a minimum budget of $12,000 to $15,000 required to test the live commerce channel. Individual creators and small teams should not copy Chinese playbooks blindly; instead, they need to calculate costs in advance and adapt strategies to local user preferences.

This article breaks down the growth trajectory, consumer behavior patterns, and benchmark brand cases in the U.S. live commerce market, providing clear marketing and channel strategy reference for brands planning to enter the U.S. market.

1. Consumer trends and user behavior: U.S. live commerce is in a high-growth phase, with full-year industry sales projected to hit nearly $20 billion, up 35% year over year. Local consumers have extremely low tolerance for hard-sell, pressure-driven content, and favor live streams that combine entertainment and social interaction, where purchases act as a natural extension of the content experience. Currently, live stream traffic on major platforms is primarily organic, and paid hard-sell ad placements deliver relatively limited returns.

2. Channel building reference: TikTok Shop is the core growth hub for U.S. live commerce, and the platform is heavily prioritizing auction formats this year, with multiple brands already delivering strong results: hair tool brand Beachwaver generated seven-figure cumulative sales on the platform across hundreds of live streams, with one 4-hour stream driving $8,000 in sales via limited-quantity auctions, product demos, and interactive giveaways. Post-restructuring legacy retail brand QVC has become one of the top-performing merchant segments on the platform after launching 24/7 live channels and airing over 200 hours of weekly content across multiple accounts, adding over 1 million new platform customers in a single year. Brands entering the space should not replicate China’s high-density conversion playbook, and instead build conversion through entertaining content and long-term user trust.

This article analyzes growth opportunities, platform policy priorities, entry risks, and operational best practices in the U.S. live commerce sector, delivering actionable decision-making reference for cross-border e-commerce sellers.

1. Opportunity signals and platform trends: U.S. live commerce is a confirmed high-growth track, with 2024 market size projected to reach nearly $20 billion, up 35% year over year. On TikTok Shop U.S., live commerce sales doubled year over year in the first half of 2026, and the platform is rolling out heavy support for auction formats this year amid growing participant inflows. Beyond cross-border sellers, local emerging brands and digitally transformed traditional retail brands have also posted strong results, with niche categories such as collectibles and designer toys holding substantial upside. For example, Whatnot reached an annual GMV of $8 billion and a $20 billion valuation with its model of “live stream sales showcases + vertical interest communities.”

2. Risk warnings and operational advice: Live streams currently account for only 14% of TikTok Shop U.S.’s total GMV, contributing far less than short videos, mall traffic, and search, so sellers should not allocate all resources exclusively to live content. Local host labor costs are roughly 7 times those in China, with hourly rates ranging from $110 to $150, requiring a minimum startup budget of $12,000 to $15,000 to test the channel, so small and medium-sized sellers should assess their risk tolerance accordingly. Teams should avoid copying hard-sell, pressure-closing tactics used in China, and instead focus on entertaining, interactive content that drives conversion through long-term user trust, prioritizing organic traffic growth first.

This article outlines top-selling categories, consumer preferences, and channel structure characteristics of the U.S. live commerce market, providing clear direction for product design and channel planning for production-oriented enterprises pursuing cross-border expansion.

1. Accessible business opportunities: U.S. live commerce is growing rapidly, with full-year industry size approaching $20 billion, up 35% year over year. Platforms including TikTok Shop are prioritizing support for auction formats in 2024, and top-performing categories so far span jewelry, plush toys, beauty, hair styling tools, collectibles, and designer toys. Products with novel features, suitability for live interactive demonstration, and inherent appeal for auction bidding are especially well-aligned with live commerce mechanics. Manufacturers can develop targeted products matching U.S. consumer demand to meet the supply chain needs of merchants operating in the space.

2. Digital and e-commerce layout insights: The core logic of U.S. live commerce is not high-frequency hard selling, but using entertaining, interactive content to drive user retention, with purchases emerging as a natural byproduct of the content experience. When building U.S. e-commerce channels, manufacturers should prioritize product designs that are visually demonstrative, conversation-worthy, and suited for interactive presentation, rather than copying the Chinese live commerce playbook of extreme value positioning and aggressive promotion. Teams should also account for channel structure: currently, short videos, in-app mall, and search contribute 86% of TikTok Shop U.S. GMV, with live streams accounting for only 14%, so they should adapt product offerings for multi-channel distribution rather than betting exclusively on the live stream format.

This article maps development trends, player composition, and core merchant pain points in the U.S. live commerce industry, offering clear business direction for service providers supporting cross-border e-commerce stakeholders.

1. Industry development trends: The U.S. live commerce market is in a phase of rapid expansion, with full-year scale projected to near $20 billion, up 35% year over year. Live commerce on core platforms including TikTok Shop is growing at over 100% annually, with platforms rolling out heavy support for auction formats this year. Current market participants include Chinese cross-border sellers, U.S.-based emerging brands, digitally transforming traditional retail brands, and vertical interest-focused live platforms, all of which hold demand for live commerce-related services, creating an expanding total addressable service market in line with sector growth.

2. Client pain points and solution directions: Merchants entering the U.S. live commerce space currently face three core pain points: first, lack of familiarity with local user preferences, leading to poor fit when copying Chinese hard-sell, pressure-closing tactics, and insufficient understanding of the requirement for content to balance entertainment and social value; second, high local host labor costs, with hourly rates of $110 to $150 bringing single-channel testing costs above $12,000, which is prohibitive for small and medium-sized merchants; third, limited performance of paid live stream ad placements, as most traffic is organic, and most merchants lack mature organic traffic operation capabilities. Service providers can build targeted offerings around localized content planning, cost-effective host resource matching, and organic traffic operation support.

This article discloses ecosystem characteristics, existing policy performance, merchant performance across segments, and user preferences in the U.S. live commerce market, providing operational and merchant acquisition reference for platforms building live commerce offerings.

1. Performance reference for existing platform practices: After shifting from a semi-closed loop model redirecting users to independent sites to full in-app closed-loop transactions, and moving from an invite-only access model to full open access, TikTok Shop U.S. has recorded rapid live commerce growth: live sales doubled year over year in the first half of 2026, with stream volume up over 60% and total broadcast duration up over 80%. The platform’s 2024 priority support for auction formats has effectively boosted merchant participation, with some merchants generating $2,000 in single-stream sales solely from auction mechanics. The strategy of onboarding traditional retail brands has delivered standout results; for example, digitally transformed QVC added 1 million new customers in a year after launching its 24/7 live channel, and per confirmation from the platform’s strategic business lead, such legacy brands have become one of the highest-performing merchant segments on the platform.

2. Optimization directions for operations and merchant acquisition: On the acquisition front, platforms should prioritize three merchant segments: first, sellers in categories well-suited for interactive auction mechanics, including jewelry, designer toys, beauty, and home tools; second, traditional retail brands with mature live operation experience; third, community-focused merchants in vertical interest categories. On the operational front, platforms should align with local user preferences against hard selling and for entertaining, social content, guiding merchants to produce highly interactive content rather than directly importing high-density conversion live stream rules from the Chinese market. Platforms should also improve their multi-channel transaction structure: since live streams currently account for only 14% of U.S. GMV, teams should parallelly build out additional transaction touchpoints including short videos, in-app mall, and search.

Drawing on multi-source industry data, first-hand practitioner interviews, and representative enterprise cases, this article outlines the development stage, core characteristics, and structural China-U.S. differences of the U.S. live commerce market, providing empirical material for cross-cultural comparative research and industrial evolution studies of live commerce.

1. New industry trends and business model characteristics: U.S. live commerce has entered a high-growth phase, with full-year industry sales approaching $20 billion, up 35% year over year, but the sector as a whole remains in an early development stage. Live streams account for only 14% of TikTok Shop U.S.’s total GMV, contributing far less than short videos, in-app mall, and search. The sector has already evolved diverse business models: general content platforms building closed-loop e-commerce systems for live selling, vertical players such as Whatnot which launched in collectibles and designer toys and reached $8 billion in annual GMV and a $20 billion valuation via a “live showcase + vertical interest community” model, and legacy TV shopping brands undergoing digital live transformation to become core merchant groups on mainstream platforms.

2. Core research-worthy questions: The core differences between Chinese and U.S. live commerce extend far beyond market scale (China’s market is projected to exceed $11 trillion in 2026, compared to just $20 billion in the U.S.) and are rooted in fundamental gaps in cultural context and consumer habits. Chinese live streams function as high-density transaction conversion venues, with a core value proposition of shortening purchase paths to improve buying efficiency; U.S. live streams act as an extension of entertainment content and interest communities, where users stay for interaction and companionship, with purchases emerging as a natural outcome of the content experience. Compounding these differences, U.S. live streaming labor costs are 7 times those in China, paid hard-sell ads deliver limited returns, and the ecosystem’s evolution path cannot be simply modeled on the development experience of the Chinese market.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

【亿邦原创】这是Jude在TikTok美区做直播的第五年。他见证了美区直播从跳转独立站成交的“半闭环”到上线TikTok Shop、转向闭环电商,从定向邀约到全面开放的整个发展历程。

“近两年我们主账号直播在线人数稳定在5k+,日均出单2w,直播贡献的业绩已经超过了短视频。”Jude介绍道。

他们主营饰品、玩偶、美妆品类,饰品和玩偶一般是英语流利的中国员工露手直播,美妆品类则请了外国主播出镜。TikTok Shop直播的竞拍功能推出后,他们也积极尝试,一场下来最多的时候能达到了2000美元的销售额。

据其观察,今年TikTok Shop美区开始大力扶持竞拍模式,入局直播的同行明显变多。

通过TikTok Shop也看到,整个美国的直播电商似乎终于热起来了。根据eMarketer的预测,美国直播购物行业今年的销售额将接近200亿美元,同比增长约35%,是2024年的两倍以上。CNBC报道显示,与2025年同期相比,TikTok Shop 2026年上半年直播业务的销售额翻了一倍以上,同期直播场次增长超60%,总直播时长增长超80%。

不止中国跨境出海商家踩中美国直播电商的风口,CNBC还报道了两个通过直播发家的美国本土品牌的典型案例。

发型工具品牌Beachwaver每年开展数百场直播带货,其TikTok Shop累计销售额已经达到100万美元,其中四分之一来自直播场景。7月末,一场4小时的直播中,Beachwaver通过限量商品拍卖、产品演示、互动福利等形式,完成8000美元销售额。

另一个是刚完成破产重组的传统电视购物品牌QVC。QVC目前也在将业务重心转向数字化,2025年4月在TikTok上线了24/7直播频道,当年在TikTok新增超100万客户,如今每周在TikTok 7个账号累计直播时长超200小时。TikTok Shop美区战略业务总裁Patrick Nommensen透露,像QVC这类传统零售品牌反而成为平台表现最好的商家之一。

以收藏品、潮玩等小众新奇品类直播起家的Whatnot,也是美国“直播热”的一个推手。赶上在疫情带来的居家消费热潮,Whatnot的直播拍卖功能爆发,首场直播便卖光全部存货,由此跑通“直播展销+垂直兴趣社区”的模式。公开数据显示,Whatnot 2025年GMV达80亿美元,目前最新估值达200亿美元,较2025年10月翻倍。

虽然美国直播电商越来越热是毋庸置疑的,但如果对比中国直播电商的大市场,还能够看到不小的差距。

据eMarketer预测,到2026年,中国直播电商市场的规模预计将超过1.1万亿美元。相比200亿美元的美国市场,中国直播电商可以说是遥遥领先。

从购物习惯和直播与短视频的占比看更是如此。Momentum Works与Tabcut联合报告显示,2025年TikTok Shop美区GMV中,短视频贡献约50%,商城与搜索占比升至36%,直播带货仅占14%。而在中国,直播带货是抖音电商GMV的绝对主力,“边看边买”几乎重塑了一代人的消费习惯。美国直播虽增速惊人,但GMV占比还远低于短视频和商城与搜索。

更值得一提的是,中美直播电商真正的分水岭可能并不是市场规模,还有更深的生活方式和文化土壤的差异。

“国内消费者看直播很大的原因是没有生活时间,没有家庭一起去逛超市的时间。但是在美国大家把逛超市是当做了一种家庭文化,不需要花大量时间在娱乐平台上购物,更不愿意看你逼单。”海外红人营销服务商吃鲸的CEO吉翔谈道。

因此,从玩法上看,美国消费者喜欢追有趣的KOL,青睐娱乐性强的直播,对硬推销不感冒。在海外受欢迎的直播往往需兼具购物与娱乐社交属性,“购物不过是'找乐子'顺带的事”。有商家表示,直播中的广告投放效果也比较有限,目前仍以自然流量为主。

直播离不开主播的人力投入,这又是中美直播电商的另一层差异。

美国达人机构孵化账号的人力成本约为国内的7倍,商家报价多在110至150美元一小时,且需至少播满一个月(100小时),测试直播市场动辄投入1.2万至1.5万美元,这不少中小卖家望而却步。

归根结底,中美直播电商的差异不只在规模,更在直播处于消费链条中的哪个位置。在中国,直播更像一个高密度的交易转化场,核心是缩短链路、提升购买效率;美国的直播则更接近娱乐内容与兴趣社区,用户先为有趣、互动和陪伴停留,购物往往是内容体验的自然延伸。

因此,对中国跨境商家而言,要在美国玩转直播电商,与其照搬国内打法,不如通过娱乐性、互动性和长期信任建立用户关系,再顺势承接销售转化。


亿邦持续追踪报道该情报,如想了解更多与本文相关信息,请扫码关注作者微信。

本文首发于 亿邦动力 官方网站

文章来源:亿邦动力

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

2025年美国直播电商的市场规模和增速是多少?

据eMarketer预测,2025年美国直播购物行业销售额将接近200亿美元,同比增长约35%。CNBC数据显示,TikTok Shop 2026年上半年直播业务销售额较2025年同期翻倍,直播场次增长超60%,总直播时长增长超80%,行业整体升温明显。

中美直播电商的核心差异体现在哪些方面?

核心差异有三点:一是规模差距大,2026年中国直播电商规模预计超1.1万亿美元,同期美国市场仅约200亿美元;二是用户偏好不同,美国用户反感硬推销,更看重直播的娱乐社交属性;三是美国主播人力成本约为国内的7倍,中小商家测试成本超1.2万美元,入局门槛更高。

中国跨境商家布局美国直播电商有哪些注意事项?

不建议直接照搬国内高密度逼单、短链路转化的打法,应当强化直播内容的娱乐性、互动性,通过长期运营建立用户信任后再顺势承接销售转化。目前美国直播硬广投放效果有限,流量仍以自然流量为主。

2025年TikTok Shop美区的GMV结构是怎样的?

据Momentum Works与Tabcut联合报告显示,2025年TikTok Shop美区GMV中,短视频贡献约50%,商城与搜索板块占比升至36%,直播带货仅占14%,直播尚未成为平台GMV的核心贡献来源。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0