广告
加载中

贡茶被卖了

陶辉东 2026-08-07 08:45
陶辉东 2026/08/07 08:45

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心信息是曾经的奶盖茶鼻祖贡茶即将被贝恩资本以约42.9亿元人民币的估值收购,贡茶虽然退出中国大陆市场,但在海外市场保持高速增长,核心干货如下:

1. 核心发展数据:贡茶2006年创立于中国台湾高雄,2010年进入中国大陆,2015-2017年大陆门店达750家,2024年大陆运营主体注销,实质退出大陆。目前贡茶在全球30多个国家有2200家门店,年度EBITDA超过7000万美元,90%以上收入来自海外。

2. 退出大陆的核心原因:一是“贡茶”是通用名称无法注册商标,山寨门店多达数千家,劣质体验彻底消耗了品牌资产;二是早期采用区域授权加盟模式,导致品控、定价失控,无法跟上新茶饮行业的迭代升级,最终被市场淘汰。

3. 海外发展现状:贡茶先后被韩国、美国资本收购,总部迁往伦敦,目前在欧美奶茶市场处于第一梯队,定下了2032年全球门店破10000家的目标。

本文给茶饮品牌经营者提供了清晰的经验教训和市场机会参考,核心干货如下:

1. 品牌建设的前车之鉴:品牌创立之初必须做好商标布局,公共通用名称无法获得独占性商标注册,会导致品牌处于无保护的“裸奔”状态,山寨品牌会快速消耗品牌资产,拉低品牌口碑,贡茶的落败就源于这一核心问题。

2. 扩张策略的教训:早期扩张不能只追求速度,采用区域授权加盟的“分封制”模式虽然能快速跑马圈地回笼资金,但会导致品控标准失控、定价混乱,还会阻碍品牌统一升级,无法应对行业竞争冲击。

3. 市场机会参考:当前欧美珍珠奶茶仍处于品类增长期,北美市场保持7.7%-12.3%的年复合增长率,门店密度低、消费者接受度不断提升,有很大增长空间,贡茶已经验证了中国茶饮品牌出海规模化扩张的可行性,本土品牌出海可参考其本地化运营经验,同时要提前布局应对竞争。

本文给茶饮卖家尤其是计划出海的卖家,提供了清晰的趋势参考和风险提示,核心干货如下:

1. 增量市场机会:当前国内茶饮市场高度内卷,9.9元低价战常态化,而欧美珍珠奶茶仍处于品类高速扩张期,北美市场保持7.7%-12.3%的年复合增长率,门店密度远低于国内,单杯售价可达5-8美元,利润空间远高于国内,开店增量空间大。

2. 风险提示:在国内布局茶饮生意,一定要提前排查商标注册风险,使用通用名称做品牌名很容易出现山寨泛滥的问题,损耗自身生意;扩张阶段不要盲目为了速度选择区域授权加盟模式,避免品控、定价失控拖垮口碑。

3. 可参考经验:出海做茶饮一定要做本地化调整,贡茶进入韩国时就主动调整甜度和配方,结合本地营销把产品包装成时尚饮品,快速打开了市场,同时要提前积累本地化的加盟网络和供应链资源,搭建稳定的运营体系。

本文给茶饮供应链工厂带来了明确的市场变化信息和商业机会提示,核心干货如下:

1. 海外订单增长机会:当前欧美珍珠奶茶品类处于高速增长期,大量茶饮品牌包括贡茶在内都在加速海外门店扩张,贡茶计划未来6年每年新增1300家门店,2032年达成万店规模,会带动大量茶饮原料、包装、设备的需求增长,国内工厂可以跟随品牌出海的步伐,拓展海外订单市场。

2. 产品生产需求变化:出海茶饮品牌需要适配海外本地消费者的口味调整产品,比如降低甜度、调整配方,对工厂的定制化原料研发生产能力要求提升,工厂可以针对性开发适配不同市场需求的产品,打开新的增长空间。

3. 数字化转型启示:贡茶等规模化出海品牌已经搭建了集中采购、数字化运营体系,对上游工厂的数字化对接能力要求提升,工厂需要加快推进自身数字化升级,才能适配头部连锁品牌的管理要求,拿到更多稳定的大额订单。

本文梳理了全球茶饮行业的发展趋势,也暴露了行业不同环节的客户痛点,给茶饮相关服务商提供了清晰的业务方向参考,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:当前全球茶饮市场呈现分化格局,国内市场已经高度内卷,而欧美等海外市场处于高速增长期,大量本土新茶饮品牌开启出海布局,相关出海配套服务的需求持续增长,资本也在持续加注海外茶饮赛道,市场空间充足。

2. 客户核心痛点:国内茶饮品牌出海面临本地化运营、加盟网络管理、供应链搭建、品牌营销落地的多重痛点,早期出海的品牌还面临商标注册合规、规模化扩张的痛点;本土品牌在国内扩张也存在商标布局、加盟体系管理的痛点。

3. 业务拓展机会:服务商可以针对性推出茶饮出海一体化解决方案,涵盖商标合规服务、本地化营销服务、加盟管理数字化工具、海外供应链配套服务等,抓住茶饮品牌出海的行业红利,贡茶的快速扩张已经验证了海外茶饮连锁的增长空间,对应服务需求会持续释放。

本文梳理了茶饮行业的发展变化,给茶饮相关供应链平台、招商加盟平台、零售平台带来了新的机会和调整方向,核心干货如下:

1. 业务拓展方向:当前茶饮品牌出海已经成为明确趋势,贡茶等品牌加速海外扩张,平台需要针对性搭建出海服务板块,满足品牌对接海外加盟商、供应链资源的需求,可以围绕海外加盟招商开设专项服务,吸引品牌入驻,开拓新的业务增长点。

2. 运营管理启示:贡茶山寨品牌泛滥的历史提醒平台,需要加强入驻品牌的资质审核,建立品牌真伪核验机制,帮助消费者和加盟商辨别正牌,规避山寨带来的风险,维护平台自身的口碑和信任度。

3. 风向规避提示:国内茶饮市场已经高度内卷,价格战常态化,平台不能过度依赖国内增量市场,需要提前布局海外增长赛道,分散经营风险;同时当前宏观利率处于中高位,并购估值回归理性,平台需要调整业务预期,合理定价,规避估值泡沫带来的风险。

贡茶的发展案例为餐饮连锁产业研究提供了非常典型的样本,反映了很多产业新动向和值得深入研究的新问题,核心干货如下:

1. 产业新动向:当前中国茶饮品类出海已经成为明确的产业新趋势,欧美市场成为全球茶饮新的增长引擎,珍珠奶茶作为中国特色饮品,正在逐步融入欧美年轻人的主流生活方式,资本也持续看好海外茶饮连锁赛道,先后多轮PE投资退出,交易规模不断增长,模式得到验证。

2. 值得研究的新问题:同一品牌在中国大陆和海外市场截然不同的发展结局,背后的经营战略、市场环境影响值得研究;本土新茶饮品牌出海后,和先期出海的贡茶等老牌茶饮品牌的竞争格局,以及差异化竞争优势问题,也值得深入探讨;此外连锁品牌扩张中,商标布局、授权加盟模式的风险边界,也有很高的研究价值。

3. 商业模式研究价值:贡茶的区域授权加盟模式在不同市场的效果差异,资本推动下茶饮品牌国际化扩张的路径,都为连锁品牌出海的商业模式研究提供了完整样本,可为后续相关研究提供真实案例支撑。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article covers the core update that Gong Cha, the pioneer of cheese foam milk tea, is set to be acquired by Bain Capital at a valuation of approximately RMB 4.29 billion. While the brand has fully exited mainland China, it maintains robust growth in overseas markets. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core development milestones: Founded in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China in 2006, Gong Cha entered mainland China in 2010, and peaked at 750 mainland stores between 2015 and 2017. Its mainland operating entity was deregistered in 2024, marking its full exit from the market. Today, Gong Cha operates 2,200 stores across over 30 countries, generates annual EBITDA of more than $70 million, and earns over 90% of its total revenue from overseas markets.

2. Core reasons for exiting mainland China: First, "Gong Cha", meaning imperial tribute tea, is a generic term that cannot be registered as an exclusive trademark. Thousands of unlicensed copycat stores eroded the brand's equity through poor customer experiences. Second, Gong Cha's early regional master franchising model led to out-of-control quality standards and pricing, leaving the brand unable to keep up with industry iteration and upgrading, ultimately forcing it out of the market.

3. Current overseas development: After successive acquisitions by South Korean and U.S. investors, Gong Cha relocated its global headquarters to London. It is now a top-tier player in the European and North American bubble tea markets, and has set a target of reaching 10,000 global stores by 2032.

This article outlines clear lessons learned and market opportunities for tea chain brand operators. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Lessons for brand building: Trademark layout must be prioritized at the founding stage. Generic terms cannot be registered as exclusive trademarks, leaving brands unprotected against copycats that quickly erode brand equity and damage reputation. Gong Cha's decline in mainland China stemmed primarily from this core mistake.

2. Lessons for expansion strategy: Early-stage expansion should not prioritize speed alone. While regional master franchising enables rapid market expansion and quick cash recovery, it often leads to inconsistent quality control, chaotic pricing, and barriers to unified brand upgrading, leaving brands unable to withstand industry competition.

3. Notes on market opportunities: The bubble tea category is still in a growth phase in Europe and North America. The North American market boasts a 7.7% to 12.3% compound annual growth rate, low store density, and rising consumer acceptance, leaving significant room for growth. Gong Cha has already proven that large-scale global expansion is feasible for Chinese tea brands. Local Chinese brands looking to go global can draw on its localization experience, while proactively preparing for future competition.

This article provides clear trend outlooks and risk warnings for tea sellers, especially those planning to expand overseas. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Incremental market opportunities: The domestic tea market is oversaturated with entrenched price wars as low as RMB 9.9 per cup. In contrast, bubble tea is still in a phase of rapid expansion in Europe and North America, with the North American market posting 7.7%-12.3% compound annual growth, far lower store density than China, and a per-cup price of $5-$8, delivering much higher profit margins than the domestic market and substantial room for new store growth.

2. Risk warnings: For tea businesses operating in China, trademark registration risks must be assessed in advance. Using a generic term as a brand name easily leads to widespread copycatting that hurts business. During expansion, avoid rushing into regional master franchising purely for speed, as out-of-control quality and pricing will quickly damage your reputation.

3. Actionable takeaways: Tea brands expanding overseas need to adapt to local preferences. When Gong Cha entered South Korea, it adjusted sweetness levels and recipes, and positioned the product as a trendy beverage through localized marketing to quickly capture market share. Brands should also build out localized franchise networks and supply chains early to establish a stable operating system.

This article outlines clear market changes and business opportunities for tea supply chain manufacturers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Opportunities for growing overseas orders: The bubble tea category is growing rapidly in Europe and North America, and major brands including Gong Cha are accelerating overseas store expansion. Gong Cha plans to add 1,300 new stores annually over the next six years to hit 10,000 global stores by 2032, which will drive rising demand for tea ingredients, packaging, and equipment. Chinese manufacturers can follow the lead of outbound tea brands to expand into the overseas order market.

2. Shifting product and production demands: Outbound tea brands need to adjust their products to fit local consumer preferences, such as lowering sugar content and reformulating recipes, which raises requirements for manufacturers' custom R&D and production capabilities. Factories can develop products tailored to different market needs to unlock new growth.

3. Insights for digital transformation: Large-scale outbound brands like Gong Cha have built centralized procurement and digital operation systems, which require higher digital integration capabilities from upstream suppliers. Factories need to accelerate their own digital upgrades to meet the management requirements of leading chain brands and secure more stable large-volume orders.

This article maps out global tea industry trends and identifies pain points across industry segments, providing clear guidance on business direction for tea-related service providers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: The global tea market is currently split: the domestic Chinese market is highly saturated, while overseas markets including Europe and North America are growing rapidly. A growing number of Chinese new tea brands are launching global expansion, driving sustained growth in demand for outbound supporting services. Capital continues to flow into the global tea track, creating substantial market opportunity.

2. Core customer pain points: Chinese tea brands expanding overseas face multiple pain points related to localized operation, franchise network management, supply chain building, and localized brand marketing. Early-stage outbound brands also face challenges related to trademark compliance and large-scale expansion. Even domestic brands expanding within China face pain points in trademark layout and franchise system management.

3. Business expansion opportunities: Service providers can develop integrated outbound solutions for tea brands covering trademark compliance, localized marketing, digital franchise management tools, and overseas supply chain supporting services to capture the industry dividend of tea brand global expansion. Gong Cha's rapid expansion has already validated the growth potential of overseas tea chains, and corresponding service demand will continue to grow.

This article maps out shifts in the tea industry, outlining new opportunities and adjustment directions for tea-related supply chain platforms, franchise matching platforms, and retail platforms. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Business expansion direction: Global expansion for Chinese tea brands is now a clear industry trend, and leading players like Gong Cha are accelerating their overseas footprint. Platforms should build dedicated outbound service segments to meet brands' demand for connecting with overseas franchisees and supply chain resources, and launch specialized services for overseas franchise recruitment to attract brand clients and open up new growth points.

2. Insights for operation management: Gong Cha's history of widespread copycatting reminds platforms to strengthen qualification checks for入驻 brands, and build brand authentication mechanisms to help consumers and franchisees distinguish authentic brands from counterfeits, mitigate copycat-related risks, and protect the platform's own reputation and user trust.

3. Risk mitigation guidance: The domestic Chinese tea market is already highly saturated with persistent price wars, so platforms should not over-rely on domestic incremental growth and should proactively enter the high-growth overseas market to diversify operational risks. Meanwhile, given current moderately high macro interest rates and more rational acquisition valuations, platforms should adjust business expectations, price services reasonably, and avoid risks from valuation bubbles.

The case of Gong Cha provides a highly typical research sample for the restaurant chain industry, reflecting new industry trends and research-worthy questions. Key insights are as follows:

1. New industry trends: Global expansion of Chinese tea categories is now a clear industry trend, and the European and North American markets have become the new growth engine for the global tea industry. As a signature Chinese beverage, bubble tea is gradually integrating into the mainstream lifestyle of young consumers in Europe and North America. Private equity has consistently backed the global tea chain track, with multiple successful exit transactions and growing deal sizes that validate the business model.

2. New research questions: The wildly different outcomes of the same brand in mainland China and overseas markets warrants further research on the impact of business strategy and market environment. The competitive landscape between new Chinese outbound tea brands and earlier players like Gong Cha, as well as the sources of their differentiated competitive advantages, are also worthy of in-depth exploration. In addition, the risk boundaries of trademark layout and master franchising models in chain brand expansion holds high research value.

3. Value for business model research: The differing performance of Gong Cha's regional master franchising model across markets, and the path of capital-fueled international expansion for tea brands, together provide a complete sample for research on the business model of global expansion for chain brands, offering solid real-world case support for future related research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

败走中国大陆市场,欧美大杀四方。

贡茶被卖了。

一些朋友看到这句话的第一反应可能会是疑惑——什么?贡茶不是已经倒闭了吗?更年轻的朋友就更加摸不着头脑了——贡茶是什么?一种茶叶吗?

不到十年前,贡茶的门店在国内一二线城市的核心商圈还随处可见。这个2006年创立于中国台湾高雄的奶茶品牌,2010年左右进入中国大陆,被誉为是“奶茶祖师爷”或“奶盖茶鼻祖”。不过,在喜茶、雪王、霸王等一众“新茶饮”崛起后,贡茶却逐渐在国内销声匿迹了,主要运营主体在2024年前后也被陆续注销。可能很多人都会以为它已经凉掉了。

不过,实际上贡茶活得相当好。《日本经济新闻》8月5日报道称,贝恩资本即将收购贡茶,给出估值的超过1000亿日元(约合42.9亿元人民币)。目前各方已达成最终协议,预计交易将在年内完成。媒体报道的数据称,贡茶年度EBITDA超过7000万美元,在全球30多个国家和地区已开出约2200家门店。

败走中国大陆市场

贡茶于2006年创立于中国台湾高雄。它不是珍珠奶茶的发明者,但在大众叙事中,常被称为“珍珠奶茶鼻祖”或“奶盖茶鼻祖”,因为它是第一个火遍全国的奶茶品牌。

早在2010年前后,贡茶在深圳设立了运营主体进军中国大陆市场。彼时,奶茶市场仍以粉末冲泡和街边小店为主,而贡茶用现泡茶底、奶盖和可选择甜度的产品,打进了商场和商业街。贡茶的熊猫奶盖、格雷三兄弟等爆款产品,曾是不少年轻人对新式茶饮的最早记忆。

在2015年至2017年,贡茶在中国大陆的门店一度达到约750家,绝对是当时中国茶饮市场的龙头之一。

但客观来说,贡茶从未能达到后来的新生代新茶饮的高度,品牌知名度也并不算高。2017年之后,贡茶更是在新茶饮的冲击下一路溃败。到2023年底,贡茶在大陆的门店缩减至239家。2024年,贡茶在中国大陆的运营主体贡茶(上海)餐饮管理有限公司被正式注销,实质退出了中国大陆市场。

贡茶败走中国大陆市场有几个主要原因。

首先是品牌名称。在中文语境中,“贡茶”指代古代进贡给朝廷的茶叶,属于茶饮行业的公共通用名称。根据中国《商标法》的相关规定,公共通用名称及描述性词汇无法被单一企业实现独占性的商标注册

由于没有商标注册,贡茶的品牌在国内基本是裸奔状态。当贡茶最初火起来之后,“XX贡茶”的山寨品牌遍地开花,不少商家甚至直接全盘复刻贡茶的门店装修与菜单设计,让消费者难以辨别真伪。有报道称,在高峰时期全国各类仿冒与山寨“贡茶”门店数量多达数千家,远超过正牌门店的数量。而这些山寨门店低劣的产品品控、糟糕的服务体验,全部转化为对“贡茶”整体品牌资产的污染。

除了商标的问题之外,贡茶自身的经营策略也有问题。

在进入中国大陆市场初期,为了追求快速的资金回笼与规模扩张,贡茶采用了爆发力强的“区域授权加盟”模式。总部将全国市场划分为多个独立的区域,并将其独家经营特许权出售给不同的区域代理商。这种“分封制”式的渠道结构在初期加速了品牌的跑马圈地,但带来的直接负面结果是品控标准的失控,导致不同门店同一款饮品的品质差距极大,严重侵蚀了品牌口碑。与此同时,由于缺乏统一的定价机制,同一款招牌奶盖茶在不同城市乃至同一城市不同区域的售价能从18元到28元不等,也极大拉低了消费者的信任度。

而且,这种割裂的“分封”治理结构也阻碍了品牌的升级。2017年前后,中国大陆茶饮行业进入产品和品牌的密集迭代期,众多新茶饮品牌强势崛起。而陷入割裂的“分封”治理结构泥潭的贡茶无力做出反应,在新茶饮最热闹的那几年被淘汰出局。

在欧美大杀四方

但没想到的是,败走中国大陆市场的贡茶,如今却在欧美市场大杀四方。

说起来挺有意思。贡茶这个品牌从2006年创立之后,可以说是一路颠沛流离,从高雄到韩国首尔,再到英国伦敦,公司总部搬了好几回。

先说说贡茶是怎么去的首尔。

2012年,前渣打银行高管马丁·贝里与妻子金汝贞将贡茶引入韩国,把店开进了首尔的弘大、明洞等年轻人聚集的商圈。他们没有简单照搬中国台湾的门店,而是调整甜度和配方,并通过门店空间和本地营销,把珍珠奶茶包装成一种时尚饮品。当时韩国的现制茶饮市场尚是空白,贡茶取得了现象级的成功,在2013至2014年间被票选为韩国最受欢迎的餐饮品牌之一。

贡茶在韩国市场的强劲表现吸引了资本的注意。2014年,韩国私募基金Unison Capital以360亿韩元收购了贡茶韩国公司70%的股权。随后,Unison Capital又多次向贡茶的母公司增资,在2017年将持股比例提升至69%至70%,完成了对贡茶母公司的绝对控股。至此,贡茶变成了一家韩国企业,全球总部也从高雄迁到了首尔。

两年后,Unison Capital获利退出,又将贡茶卖给了TA Associates,这是一家美国的成长型PE机构,擅长进行单笔投资数亿美元的中小型收购。据韩国媒体当时报道,这笔交易价格的约3500亿韩元,Unison Capital的获利高达5倍,被韩媒评为当年度亚洲最佳PE退出交易之一。

TA Associates买下贡茶后,进一步推动贡茶的国际化发展。它把贡茶的全球总部迁到了伦敦,又从麦当劳等老牌餐饮连锁找来职业经理人。TA Associates投资时,贡茶在17个国家拥有1100多家门店。而到2026年初,贡茶的门店网络已延伸至全球32个国家和地区,门店总量达到约2200家。根据TA披露的数据,2016年至2019年,贡茶收入和EBITDA的年复合增长率分别达到43%和70%。前面已经说过,这期间贡茶在中国大陆市场基本上溃败状态,因此其在欧美市场的增长速度会比这两个数字还要高。

很多人可能想不到,在国内已经不再新鲜的珍珠奶茶,在欧美却正处于品类扩张阶段,开始逐渐渗透进欧美青年群体的主流生活方式。数据显示,2025年美国珍珠奶茶行业市场规模已达到26亿美元,全美奶茶门店数量扩增至7,845家,同比增速达18.2%;而整个北美市场规模则在11.85亿至14.29亿美元之间,并保持着7.7%至12.3%的高复合年增长率。

目前,贡茶在美国开出了大约240家门店,仅略少于来自纽约的美国本土品牌功夫茶,是绝对的第一梯队。而且贡茶提出的目标是,到2028年要把北美的门店数提升至500家。

目前,贡茶90%以上的收入来自大中华区以外。在中国茶饮市场挤进数十万家门店,9.9元和买一送一几乎被常态化之时,贡茶却在日韩、北美、欧洲和澳洲以每杯约5至8美元的价格继续做着珍珠奶茶。

贝恩买的是一条仍在增长的曲线

今年初,已经营了贡茶六年多的TA Associates开始寻求退出。路透社5月份的报道援引知情人士称,TA Associates希望贡茶交易作价能达到20亿美元,贝恩资本、泛大西洋等机构参与竞购。这一估值是按照7000万美元EBITDA的30倍计算的,包含了对未来快速开店的较高预期。

显然,这与媒体最新报道的超过1000亿日元(约合42.9亿元人民币)的价格差距很大。媒体报道称,估值下调的原因是:“宏观利率处于中高位、消费并购估值回归理性的市场环境下,买卖双方最终在约9.0倍EBITDA的合理区间达成一致。”当然,即便估值大幅下调,与2019年TA Associates收购时的2.88亿美元估值相比也增长了120%。

站在贝恩资本的角度,此刻收购贡茶的逻辑也很清晰。

首先就是前面提到的,珍珠奶茶在欧美仍有品类增长空间。不同市场研究机构对规模的估算差异较大,但多数预计北美珍珠奶茶市场未来数年仍将保持中高个位数至低双位数增长。相比中国大陆的数十万家现制茶饮门店,欧美市场的门店密度还很低,消费频次也有提升空间。

同时,贡茶是少数经过验证的在欧美市场具备规模化扩展能力的奶茶品牌。从特许经营网络的管理,到连锁门店改造、集中采购和数字化运营,贡茶已经积累了丰富经验。

实际上,贡茶提出的开店目标相当激进。根据贡茶管理层公布的全球路线图,其目标是在2032年前实现全球门店突破10,000家,其中对欧美市场的深耕将是实现这一万店愿景的最核心引擎。如果以贡茶现有约2200家店计算,未来六年需要新增约7800家,平均每年新增1300家左右,这远高于过去七年的速度。

当然,贡茶接下来面临的竞争可能会比过去十年激烈得多。在国内卷生卷死的新茶饮品牌们,正在集体把目光转向海外。蜜雪冰城已经在东南亚建立数千家门店,并开始试探欧美市场;喜茶、霸王茶姬、茶百道等品牌也在不同国家布局。躲得过初一躲不过十五,贡茶最终还是要与这些茶饮品牌正面竞争。当然,贡茶十余年来积累的本地加盟网络、供应链和消费者认知会是一笔重要的优势。

注:文/陶辉东,文章来源:投中网(公众号ID:China-Venture),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:投中网

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

贡茶是什么品牌?

贡茶是2006年创立于中国台湾高雄的奶茶品牌,被誉为奶盖茶鼻祖,2010年进入中国大陆市场,巅峰时期大陆门店达750家,后退出大陆市场,目前在全球30多个国家和地区拥有约2200家门店,90%以上收入来自大中华区以外。

贡茶为什么会退出中国大陆市场?

贡茶退出中国大陆主要有两大原因,一是“贡茶”属于茶饮行业公共通用名称,无法获得独占商标注册,山寨门店泛滥严重污染品牌资产;二是采用区域授权加盟模式,导致品控、定价不统一,治理结构割裂无法跟上新茶饮行业迭代节奏。

贝恩资本为什么收购贡茶?

首先珍珠奶茶在欧美仍处于品类扩张阶段,市场保持中高个位数到低双位数增长,门店密度、消费频次还有较大提升空间;其次贡茶是少数经证实具备欧美规模化扩张能力的奶茶品牌,拥有成熟的加盟管理、供应链运营经验,增长空间明确。

贡茶目前的海外经营情况怎么样?

贡茶目前在全球32个国家和地区拥有约2200家门店,90%以上收入来自大中华区以外,美国市场门店约240家,属于当地奶茶品牌第一梯队,2016到2019年收入和EBITDA年复合增长率分别达43%、70%,目标2032年全球门店破1万家。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0