广告
加载中

嘉立创敲钟 钟鼎资本押注“基础设施”的跃迁之路

簪竹 2026-08-05 08:40
簪竹 2026/08/05 08:40

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心披露了投资机构钟鼎资本押注电子研发基础设施龙头嘉立创,并陪伴其成功登陆A股,市值破千亿的全过程,同时分享了钟鼎的长期投资逻辑,核心干货整理如下:

1. 嘉立创核心发展成果:嘉立创从PCB打样起家,依托工业软件与数字化柔性制造打通非标需求与自动化生产链路,将打样成本从数千元降至数十元,交付周期压缩到2-3天;完成全产业链整合后业绩增长强劲,2025年营收达102.31亿元,净利润13.06亿元,EDA软件累计注册用户近960万,是支撑全球硬件创新的底层基础设施。

2. 可参考的投资启示:普通人做资产配置、选择投资标的时,可参考锚定时代核心基础设施赛道的逻辑,优先选择解决真实行业痛点、管理层具备长期战略定力、拥有高竞争壁垒的标的,更易获得穿越周期的稳定收益。

本文对品牌商布局ToB电子研发服务赛道、打造长期品牌竞争力有较多参考干货,具体整理如下:

1. 产业与消费趋势:当前全球硬件创新、物理AI快速迭代,带动电子研发端分散的非标小批量打样需求快速增长,传统PCB行业聚焦大批量订单,该领域长期供给不足、成本高企,存在大量市场机会,品牌商可瞄准该痛点切入布局。

2. 品牌建设参考:嘉立创靠长期满足客户真实需求,在全球千万工程师群体中建立了强心智壁垒,这种用户信任是其最深的护城河。品牌建设比起短期营销投放,长期深耕用户需求、坚持长期价值更能建立难以复制的品牌优势。

3. 产品研发方向参考:嘉立创走全链路整合路线,从EDA设计到PCB制造、元器件采购再到SMT贴片形成完整闭环,既提升了客户粘性,也靠规模效应摊薄了成本,这种一站式生态的研发路线适合ToB研发服务品牌参考。

本文为电子研发、制造领域的卖家梳理了市场机会、发展路径与风险提示,核心干货整理如下:

1. 市场机会:当前全球硬件创新、AI技术迭代带动电子研发端小批量、非标需求快速增长,传统行业供给缺口大,中小卖家可切入细分环节对接市场需求,分享行业增长红利。

2. 可学习的发展路径:嘉立创从PCB打样细分赛道切入,逐步延伸业务,最终完成全链路整合的模式可借鉴,围绕客户真实需求,以长周期布局业务,逐步积累用户心智和技术壁垒,就能获得持续稳定的增长。

3. 风险与机会提示:该赛道四重壁垒极高,新进入者难以短期突破全链路市场,中小卖家要避免盲目扩张,可找准细分环节定位,对接嘉立创等龙头平台的生态,参与产业链分工获得稳定增长机会。

本文对传统电子制造工厂的数字化转型、拓展新业务增长点有较多启示,核心干货整理如下:

1. 产品生产需求与新商业机会:当前电子研发端小批量、多品种、快交付的非标打样需求增长迅速,传统制造工厂大多聚焦大批量订单,该领域供给缺口大,是传统工厂重要的新业务增长点。

2. 数字化转型启示:嘉立创的转型经验值得参考,其通过云端EDA、CAM两大工业软件,打通前端用户非标需求与后端自动化生产链路,实现了柔性制造,既大幅降低了生产成本,也压缩了交付周期,传统工厂可参考该路径,推进工业软件应用与数字化改造,匹配新的市场需求。

3. 合作机会:嘉立创已经形成了覆盖全链路的研发制造生态,对上下游配套生产有大量需求,传统制造工厂可对接其生态,获得稳定订单,同时借助生态资源完成自身技术升级。

本文对电子研发、AI基建领域的服务商梳理了行业趋势、客户痛点与可参考的解决方案,核心干货整理如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:当前智能制造与AI技术发展,带动电子研发基础设施、AI新基建两大领域快速发展,一站式全链路服务、底层算力基础设施的需求持续增长,服务商有大量的市场空间可以挖掘。

2. 核心客户痛点:传统电子研发领域存在小批量打样供给不足、成本高、交期长的痛点,AI基础设施领域的创新技术也缺乏对接产业场景落地的渠道,需要服务商整合资源解决相关问题。

3. 可参考的解决方案:服务商可借鉴钟鼎资本的生态服务模式,绑定产业链主企业,向上挖掘底层创新项目,同时为创新企业对接产业资源,帮助技术落地,形成“服务端+产业端”的正向增强回路,也可参考嘉立创的一站式方案,整合多环节资源提升客户粘性。

本文对ToB研发制造类平台的运营管理、壁垒构建、风险规避有较多参考干货,核心内容整理如下:

1. 客户对平台的核心需求:电子研发领域客户需要一站式解决从设计、打样到元器件采购、贴片的全流程需求,单一环节服务难以满足客户需求,也无法形成高客户粘性。

2. 平台运营管理参考:嘉立创整合内部四大业务板块形成全链路闭环的经验可借鉴,这种模式既可以形成网络效应提升客户粘性,也能依托大规模拼板生产提升原材料利用率,持续摊薄边际成本,形成成本优势。

3. 壁垒构建与风险规避:平台需要从用户心智、工业软件底层技术沉淀、订单规模、全国产能布局四个维度构建竞争壁垒,能有效抵御新进入者竞争。同时平台发展要锚定基础设施定位,围绕真实需求长期布局,避免跟风短期风口,可有效降低经营风险,穿越行业周期。

本文为研究智能制造产业、风险投资行业的研究者提供了新鲜的案例与产业动向,核心干货整理如下:

1. 产业新动向:当前电子研发领域已经出现了整合全链路的一站式基础设施平台,嘉立创的成功上市验证了该模式的商业可行性;AI浪潮下,投资端已经提前布局AI全链路基础设施,核心聚焦新算力、新存储、光互联三个核心品类,四大发展趋势值得关注:从训练到推理、从2D到3D、从电子到光子、优势供应链出海。

2. 新的投资商业模式:钟鼎资本形成了成熟的基础设施投资方法论“资源跑道模型”,分为三步落地:聚焦核心赛道、绑定链主企业、向上挖掘底层创新,还形成了投资端与产业端的正向增强回路,依托共赢思维整合生态资源,是值得研究的新投资模式。

3. 智能制造新商业模式:嘉立创开创了依托工业软件打通非标需求与自动化生产的柔性制造新模式,解决了行业长期痛点,形成了四重难以复制的壁垒,为中国制造转型升级提供了典型样板。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article details the full story of how investment firm ZhenFund bet on JLC, a leader in electronic R&D infrastructure, supported its successful A-share listing and helped it grow into a RMB 100 billion+ market cap company. It also shares ZhenFund’s long-term investment logic. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. JLC’s core development achievements: Starting out as a PCB prototyping service provider, JLC leverages industrial software and digital flexible manufacturing to connect non-standard demand with automated production. This innovation cut prototyping costs from thousands of RMB to tens of RMB, and reduced delivery lead time to just 2-3 days. After completing full industrial chain integration, JLC has delivered strong growth. In 2025, it posted RMB 10.231 billion in revenue and RMB 1.306 billion in net profit, with nearly 9.6 million cumulative registered users for its EDA software. It is now a foundational infrastructure supporting global hardware innovation.

2. Investment insights for individual investors: For individual investors building asset allocation and selecting investment targets, it is advisable to anchor on the era’s core infrastructure sectors, and prioritize targets that solve genuine industry pain points, are led by management with long-term strategic focus, and have strong competitive moats. This approach increases the likelihood of generating stable, cycle-resilient returns.

This article offers valuable insights for brands looking to enter the B2B electronic R&D service sector and build long-term competitive advantages. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry and consumer trends: The rapid growth of global hardware innovation and physical AI has driven surging demand for fragmented, non-standard, small-batch PCB prototyping in electronic R&D. Traditional PCB players have long focused on large-volume orders, leaving this segment undersupplied and overpriced, creating significant market opportunities for brands that can address this pain point.

2. Lessons for brand building: JLC built strong brand recognition among 10 million engineers globally by consistently meeting genuine customer needs over the long term, and this user trust is its deepest competitive moat. Compared to short-term marketing spend, long-term commitment to understanding user needs and delivering long-term value builds far more hard-to-replicate brand advantages.

3. Guidance for product R&D strategy: JLC adopted a full-link integration strategy, building a complete closed loop from EDA design, PCB manufacturing, component sourcing to SMT placement. This approach not only improves customer stickiness but also spreads costs across scale, a one-stop ecosystem R&D path that B2B R&D service brands can learn from.

This article outlines market opportunities, growth paths and risk warnings for sellers in the electronic R&D and manufacturing sectors. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Market opportunities: Global hardware innovation and AI iteration have driven rapid growth in small-batch, non-standard demand in electronic R&D, creating a large supply gap in the traditional industry. Small and medium-sized sellers can enter niche segments to match market demand and capture industry growth dividends.

2. A replicable growth path: Sellers can learn from JLC’s model: starting from the niche PCB prototyping segment, gradually expanding business scope, and ultimately completing full industrial chain integration. By centering on genuine customer needs, laying out long-term business strategies, and accumulating user recognition and technical barriers step by step, sellers can achieve sustained, stable growth.

3. Risk and opportunity notes: This sector has extremely high four-fold barriers to entry, making it hard for new players to break into the full-link market in the short term. Small and medium-sized sellers should avoid blind expansion, instead positioning themselves in clear niche segments, connecting to the ecosystem of leading platforms like JLC, and growing stably by participating in industrial chain division of labor.

This article offers important insights for traditional electronic manufacturing factories pursuing digital transformation and new growth points. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New production demand and business opportunities: Demand for non-standard prototyping (small-batch, multi-variety, fast-delivery) in electronic R&D is growing rapidly. Most traditional manufacturing factories focus on large-volume orders, leaving a large supply gap in this segment that represents a major new growth opportunity for traditional players.

2. Lessons for digital transformation: JLC’s transformation experience is a useful reference. By leveraging cloud-based EDA and CAM industrial software, JLC connected front-end user non-standard demand with back-end automated production to achieve flexible manufacturing, drastically cutting production costs and reducing delivery lead times. Traditional factories can follow this path, rolling out industrial software applications and digital upgrades to match new market demand.

3. Collaboration opportunities: JLC has built a full-link R&D and manufacturing ecosystem with strong demand for upstream and downstream supporting production. Traditional manufacturing factories can connect to JLC’s ecosystem to secure stable orders, and complete their own technology upgrades with ecosystem resources.

This article outlines industry trends, customer pain points and reference solutions for service providers in electronic R&D and AI infrastructure. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: The growth of smart manufacturing and AI has driven rapid expansion of two major sectors: electronic R&D infrastructure and new AI infrastructure. Demand for one-stop full-link services and underlying computing infrastructure continues to grow, leaving significant untapped market space for service providers.

2. Core customer pain points: In traditional electronic R&D, small-batch prototyping suffers from undersupply, high costs and long lead times; in AI infrastructure, innovative technologies lack channels to connect with industrial scenarios for commercialization. Service providers are needed to integrate resources to solve these problems.

3. Reference solutions: Service providers can learn from ZhenFund’s ecosystem service model: binding with leading industrial chain players, sourcing underlying innovation projects upstream, and connecting innovative companies with industrial resources to help commercialize technologies, forming a positive reinforcement loop between the service side and the industrial side. They can also draw on JLC’s one-stop model, integrating multi-link resources to improve customer stickiness.

This article offers valuable references for B2B R&D manufacturing platforms on operations management, barrier building and risk mitigation. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core customer demand for platforms: Customers in electronic R&D need one-stop services covering the entire process from design, prototyping to component sourcing and placement. Single-link services cannot meet customer demand or build high customer stickiness.

2. Lessons for platform operations management: Platforms can learn from JLC’s experience of integrating four internal business units to build a full-link closed loop. This model generates network effects to improve customer stickiness, and leverages mass panel sharing production to increase raw material utilization, continuously lowering marginal costs and building sustainable cost advantages.

3. Barrier building and risk mitigation: Platforms need to build competitive barriers across four dimensions: user mindshare, underlying industrial software technology accumulation, order scale and national production capacity layout, to effectively fend off competition from new entrants. Meanwhile, platforms should anchor their positioning as infrastructure, make long-term layouts centered on genuine demand, and avoid chasing short-term hype, which effectively reduces operational risk and helps the business navigate industry cycles.

This article provides updated case studies and industry insights for researchers focused on smart manufacturing and venture capital. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New industry trends: A full-link integrated one-stop infrastructure platform has emerged in the electronic R&D sector, and JLC’s successful IPO has validated the commercial viability of this model. Against the AI boom, investors have already begun early布局 in full-chain AI infrastructure, focusing on three core categories: new computing power, new storage and optical interconnection. Four major industry trends are worth noting: shift from model training to inference, shift from 2D to 3D, shift from electronics to photonics, and global expansion of competitive supply chains.

2. A new investment business model: ZhenFund has developed a mature infrastructure investment methodology called the "resource runway model", which is implemented in three steps: focus on core tracks, bind with leading industry chain players, and source underlying innovation upstream. It has also built a positive reinforcement loop between investment and industrial sides, integrating ecosystem resources through a win-win mindset, which is a new investment model worthy of in-depth study.

3. A new business model for smart manufacturing: JLC pioneered a new flexible manufacturing model that uses industrial software to connect non-standard demand with automated production, solving long-standing industry pain points and building four layers of hard-to-replicate barriers. It provides a representative case study for the transformation and upgrading of Chinese manufacturing.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

8月4日,嘉立创(001232.SZ)正式登陆资本市场,市值破1000亿元。作为从PCB打样起家的企业,嘉立创凭借工业软件与数字化柔性制造,打通了非标需求与自动化生产链路,不仅将打样成本从数千元降至数十元、交付周期压缩至2-3天,更支撑起硬件创新和物理AI的快速迭代,被业内誉为“中国智能硬件席卷全球的背后引擎”。

作为唯一一家长期陪伴嘉立创的投资机构,钟鼎资本从早期介入并持续加注。自2019年参投旗下立创商城A轮起,钟鼎资本先后于2021年联合入局5亿元重组融资,助力集团全产业链整合;又在2022年IPO前加码9亿元战略轮,完整见证了嘉立创从业务整合到成功上市的全周期成长。

如今,随着嘉立创的上市,钟鼎资本管理合伙人尹军平、钟鼎资本合伙人朱迎春也接受了投中网的对话,系统性地复盘了嘉立创投资的全过程,以及AI时代下,钟鼎资本对于投资的思考,和自身脉络的演进。在钟鼎资本看来,投资不仅是一次资本注入,更是基于自身产业基因,对每个时代中“基础设施资产”的精准锚定。

从“补位”到“整合”

嘉立创投资背后的瞄准

钟鼎资本与嘉立创的结缘,并非偶然,而是一场“带着地图出发”的精准补位。用朱迎春的话说,这是钟鼎在“研发基础设施”版图上一定要拼上的拼图。

在对话中,朱迎春回顾了此前钟鼎在智能制造“研发基础设施”领域完成的多笔布局——科学计算与系统建模仿真工业软件同元软控、智能CAM软件苏州千机、自动化零部件一站式平台怡合达(301029)、跨工艺一站式制造平台海智在线。但在智能硬件研发“机械+电子”两大核心板块中,电子板块始终缺位。对此,钟鼎的判断是:中国应该有一个能在电子研发领域扮演“基础设施”角色的标的。

“最初,钟鼎接触的是立创商城,一个电子元器件零售平台。”朱迎春回忆称,但随着发掘的深入,投资团队发现其身后,还藏着一个更具价值的实体——嘉立创。彼时,嘉立创集团旗下有EDA设计、PCB制造、元器件商城、SMT贴片四大业务,但他们尚未充分整合,形成合力。因此,钟鼎进场后,第一件做的事,就是推动集团整合。

“其实,这一提议与嘉立创管理层内心想法不谋而合,只是他们内部仍对协调难度有所顾虑。我们的介入,首先是帮他们坚定了整合决心;随后,针对四大板块,钟鼎又分别梳理了各自股权结构,用真金白银完成了市场化定价与投资,为内部整合进一步扫清障碍。”朱迎春记忆犹新。

事实证明,这一决策对嘉立创后来的发展至关重要。整合后的嘉立创,从EDA软件到PCB打样、元器件采购,再到SMT贴片,形成了完整的电子研发全链路闭环。招股书显示,这一战略整合成效显著:2022年-2025年,公司营业收入从67.26亿元增长至102.31亿元,净利润也从7.34亿元增长至13.06亿元;今年一季度公司营收达30.28亿元,同比增长45.29%;净利润为3.7亿元,同比增长51.71%,再次展现出强劲的增长势头。

与此同时,其“一站式”服务生态也形成了强大的网络效应和客户粘性。截至2025年末,嘉立创的EDA软件全球累计注册用户数达959.16万,付费用户达135.73万,年累计订单量达2108.18万笔。作为电子研发领域的“基础设施”,嘉立创已然成为面向全球硬件创新分散研发需求的底层支撑,并获得广泛市场认可度。

四重壁垒之上

嘉立创与钟鼎的长期主义价值观共鸣

然而,这一亮眼成绩的背后,是一种极其朴素的团队底层支撑和决策机制。

朱迎春对此曾有一个感性描述:“嘉立创这家公司的管理层,是我所有投资企业里非常敬重的一支团队。他们以客户真实需求为第一性原理做判断,以5年为长周期布局做新业务,战略定力极强。”朱迎春评价道,真正能把这种战略定力坚持到位的,其实在中国的创新企业中并不多见,而且他们进一步基于“需求真实性、培育周期、牵头人选、激励机制”四大维度而展开落地执行,持续打开公司的战略边界。

与此同时,朱迎春在对话中,也进一步拆解了嘉立创的本质:它表面上是做制造,但实则是通过云端EDA和CAM两大工业级软件,拉通前端非标需求与后端自动化生产的智能制造平台。这一定位彻底解决了国内传统PCB行业的长期痛点——产能集中大批量订单,而研发端小批量打样长期供给不足、成本高企、周期漫长,是典型的解决了行业痛点并带来全新升级的智能制造平台。

而要让这套平台模式真正跑通,是嘉立创难以被轻易复制的核心壁垒,朱迎春将其总结为“四座大山”:一是全球900余万工程师积累的强心智,无法通过短期营销突破;二是EDA、CAM工业软件的底层技术沉淀,需要长期积累;三是足够大的订单规模支撑多客户拼板生产,板材利用率极高,边际成本持续摊薄;四是全国多个生产基地形成的产能门槛。

这使得,于商业而言,嘉立创凭借高壁垒的能力建设和全链路的一站式服务,在全球千万级工程师与日益庞大的创客极客群体中,建立起了一种难以割舍的“信任连接”。这种信任度,是其最深的护城河。

于社会价值而言,嘉立创不仅通过“AI+制造”的深度融合,亲手打造了中国智能制造的样板,更重要的是,提升了全社会硬件研发效率,悄然推动着整个中国,乃至全球硬件创新底层制造能力的升级。而这,正是钟鼎资本投资每个时代下“基础设施资产”,所能释放的最大价值。

回望2009年创立至今,朱迎春告诉投中网,钟鼎资本的初心始终朴素:打造一家具备持续生命力、受人尊重的投资机构。嘉立创的这笔投资,恰好让朱迎春口中的这份初心,有了更具象的落脚点。

第一层是业绩底线。投资嘉立创,就是布局一个高壁垒、强者恒强、持续创造价值的商业平台,作为投资人,钟鼎资本能够持续为LP创造稳定优质的回报,不辜负出资人的信任。

第二层是产业价值。财务回报之下,嘉立创为整个社会创造极大的价值,是一家高度受人尊敬的企业,毫无疑问也为钟鼎的生态圈创造出了真实的赋能价值,这也是钟鼎资本获得行业认可的重要来源。

第三层,也是投资的终极乐趣,在于同行。即陪伴时代顶尖、志同道合的企业家共同成长。嘉立创管理层那种以客户真实需求为第一性原理的朴素初心,以及甘坐冷板凳、以5年为周期布局的战略定力,恰恰是钟鼎资本最想与之同行的“优秀的人”。

在朱迎春看来,嘉立创的管理层与钟鼎自身,也有着某种气质上的共通——双方都信奉长期主义,都愿意在认定有社会价值的领域持续投入。“我们一直觉得,投资机构跟企业一样,也要有自己的基因和定力。”他说。

这种“与优秀的人同行”的获得感,正是超越财务投资回报的部分。尽管行业周期不断变迁,但钟鼎资本的初心始终不变:投资,不仅是一次布局、一笔注资,更是与一群有理想、有韧劲的创业者,共同践行“做有意义的事”。

物流到AI基础设施

钟鼎“卖铲子”的投资哲学

嘉立创的投资并非孤案,它是钟鼎资本长期布局“基础设施”赛道的典型样本。

在尹军平看来,这一赛道的投资策略有着清晰的演进脉络:2010年成立之初,团队聚焦物流赛道——彼时,物流正是电商与消费勃兴的核心基础设施。以此为“根据地”,钟鼎在实践中沉淀出一套基础设施投资的系统方法论。

2015年起,团队又顺应产业互联网浪潮,将版图拓展至一众垂直领域的平台型企业;如今AI浪潮奔涌,钟鼎已核心卡位AI全链路基础设施,深度覆盖从AIDC、先进制程、AI芯片到工业软件与通用大模型的全链路环节。

这套演进脉络并非跳跃式转场,而是一条基于“卖铲子”哲学的自然延伸——表面看,赛道在变,但实质上,逻辑一致。“我们始终投资于每个时代下的基础设施,”尹军平总结道,“从物流到跨境服务基础设施,再到AI新基建,核心能力能够平滑迁移。”

基于这套逻辑,钟鼎“一体两翼”的投资图谱逐渐清晰:以AI基础设施、AI应用为“体”,出海和智能制造为“两翼”。其中,“一体”投资中,AI基础设施方向占据半壁江山。

在这一核心阵地上,尹军平认为,AI基础设施赛道的竞争,本质上是算力底座的卡位战。他重点划出了三个核心品类——新算力、新存储、光互联;以及四大趋势——从训练到推理、从2D到3D、从电子到光子,以及优势供应链出海。

而驱动钟鼎持续捕获稀缺资产的底层引擎,是一套历经多轮周期验证的方法论——“资源跑道模型”。

尹军平详细拆解了这套模型的落地三步骤:一是“聚焦”,结合自身禀赋与市场机遇,精准锁定核心赛道;二是“拥抱链主”,依托钟鼎特有的供应链视角,识别并深度绑定赛道内的链主企业;三是“挖上游”,通过紧密互动沿产业链向上溯源,挖掘底层创新,从而规避盲目泛化的投资风险。

中联数据便是这一路径下的典型代表。这家国内排名第二的AIDC运营商,是钟鼎在算力基建赛道中紧密合作的链主之一。通过与链主的高频交流,钟鼎不仅持续刷新行业认知,更借此提前触达其上游的创新项目,精准捕获稀缺投资机会。而在投后环节,钟鼎又为被投企业反向对接供应链资源,助力其快速落地场景——由此,形成“投资端”与“产业端”的正向增强回路。

沿着这一路径,钟鼎已成功将触角延伸至液冷、SST、HVDC、预制化模块、新型储能,乃至算电协同与智慧运维等关键节点;并协助被投企业的创新技术,在真实的产业场景中一一得到验证,完成部署。

这背后,本质上是钟鼎的共赢思维。“先人后己不是口号,”尹军平说,“它是我们与链主深度合作的底层哲学。”

在尹军平看来,这套投资哲学的根基,从来不是依赖短期人情与关系,而是通过系统性整合生态资源,与链主生态共享、价值共创。

交流到尾声,一条清晰的脉络贯穿始终:从嘉立创所代表的电子研发基础设施,到当下重兵布局的AI基础设施,钟鼎锚定的始终是每个时代下,最硬核的“卖铲子”生意。回望来路,无论是电商时代的物流、跨境周期下的出海服务,还是AI时代的计算、存储、互联及半导体设备与材料——赛道在变,钟鼎的“姿势”不变。

在钟鼎看来,每一轮产业浪潮的更替,底层基础设施资产始终都是穿越周期的核心密码。这也是为什么,他们总能在风口成型之前,提前铺好路、布好局,找到产业中最稳固的贝塔。

注:文/簪竹,文章来源:投中网(公众号ID:China-Venture),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:投中网

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

嘉立创是做什么的?

嘉立创是电子研发领域的基础设施型企业,依托EDA、CAM工业软件与数字化柔性制造,打通非标需求与自动化生产链路,提供从EDA设计、PCB打样、元器件采购到SMT贴片的全链路一站式服务,可大幅降低硬件研发成本、缩短交付周期。

钟鼎资本的核心投资逻辑是什么?

钟鼎资本信奉“卖铲子”投资哲学,长期布局各时代核心基础设施资产,当前已形成以AI基础设施、AI应用为“体”,出海和智能制造为“两翼”的投资图谱,依托“资源跑道模型”捕获稀缺资产,追求与被投企业生态共享、价值共创。

嘉立创的核心竞争壁垒有哪些?

嘉立创核心壁垒共四点:一是全球900余万工程师积累的强用户心智,二是EDA、CAM工业软件的长期底层技术沉淀,三是大规模订单支撑的高板材利用率、低边际成本优势,四是全国多个生产基地形成的产能门槛。

钟鼎资本在嘉立创发展中提供了哪些支持?

钟鼎资本从2019年起参投嘉立创旗下立创商城A轮,2021年联合入局5亿元重组融资,推动其四大业务板块整合并扫清股权障碍,2022年IPO前加码9亿元战略轮,完整陪伴嘉立创从业务整合到成功上市的全周期成长。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0