广告
加载中

小米“老对手”败退:卖出3亿台 拿不下中国1%市场

天下网商 2026-07-29 12:21
天下网商 2026/07/29 12:21

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心内容是OPPO子品牌realme退出中国手机市场的事件与行业背景,干货内容整理如下:

1. 核心事件:realme官宣暂停在中国市场的产品更新,销售与售后交由OPPO接手,未来将集中资源深耕海外市场,该品牌全球累计销量已经突破3亿台,但在中国市场市占率已经跌破1%。

2. realme败退的核心原因:当前国内用户平均换机周期已经延长至近3年半,手机从快消品转为耐用品,市场进入存量博弈,前六家头部品牌已经占据96.4%的市场份额,小众品牌生存空间极小;realme自身只主打低价高配,产品偏科,质感不足,品牌没能破圈,还和同体系一加定位重叠,最终被市场淘汰。

3. 当前行业新动向:AI已经成为手机行业新的增长风口,各大厂商都在布局AI手机、自研大模型,折叠屏、车机系统也成为新的探索方向。

本文梳理了中国手机行业的最新格局与消费趋势,总结出品牌布局的经验教训,干货整理如下:

1. 当前行业与消费趋势:手机已经从快消品转为耐用品,用户换机周期大幅延长,行业从增量市场转为存量博弈,头部品牌集中度极高,六大头部厂商占据96.4%的市场份额,产品同质化严重;AI崛起既推高了存储芯片成本挤压利润,也带来了新的增长风口。

2. 品牌布局的教训:realme作为对标小米的线上性价比子品牌,仅靠单一性价比定位无法满足国内消费者既要性能也要影像、质感的全方位需求,品牌认知没能破圈,核心用户购买力弱增长后劲不足,还出现同体系品牌定位重叠的内耗问题,最终败退。

3. 可参考的战略方向:多品牌分层布局可以共享供应链降低成本,国内市场饱和后可战略收缩深耕海外市场挖掘增量,AI、折叠屏、车机是值得布局的新赛道。

本文分析了当前手机行业的格局变化,梳理了市场机会与风险,对手机卖家的干货内容如下:

1. 国内市场风险提示:当前国内手机市场已经进入高度存量竞争,头部品牌占据绝大多数份额,中小品牌生存空间极小,纯性价比赛道只有背靠大型母品牌的少数玩家能够存活,单一性价比定位增长后劲不足,进入国内小众手机赛道的风险极高。

2. 新的增长机会:AI已经成为手机行业新的增长风口,AI手机、终端大模型、折叠屏、特色功能手机、车机系统都属于新的增量方向,消费者对这类创新产品接受度较高,存在较大的市场空间。

3. 可拓展的方向:国内市场饱和后,海外市场仍有增量空间,背靠母品牌供应链出海是可行的增长路径,卖家可以对接出海品牌的相关业务,挖掘海外市场的需求机会。

本文分析了手机行业的需求变化与格局,给手机生产相关工厂带来的干货启示整理如下:

1. 产品生产设计需求变化:当前国内消费者对手机的要求已经从单一参数转向全维度均衡,不再满足只堆性能、牺牲质感的性价比产品,要求性能、影像、机身质感都不能偏废,工厂在生产端需要适配这种全维度均衡的产品设计需求。

2. 可把握的商业机会:行业份额不断向头部品牌集中,未来头部品牌的订单占比会持续提升,工厂可以加深与头部品牌的合作绑定;同时AI手机、折叠屏、车机智能硬件等新赛道快速发展,会带来大量新的生产订单需求,工厂可以提前布局适配新的生产要求。

3. 数字化与供应链启示:多品牌共享厂区、共享供应链和集中化采购的模式,可以有效降低生产成本,发挥规模效应,工厂可以推进数字化协同生产,适配多品牌多品类的生产需求,提升运营效率。

本文梳理了智能手机行业的发展趋势与核心痛点,给手机相关服务商的干货内容整理如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:当前手机行业已经从增量市场转入存量博弈,市场份额向头部品牌高度集中,AI成为行业接下来的核心增长方向,AI终端、终端大模型、车机智能化、折叠屏是行业公认的主要探索方向。

2. 行业客户的核心痛点:当前手机品牌的核心痛点包括存量市场下增长空间不足,AI发展带来存储芯片成本暴涨,挤压品牌利润;多品牌布局容易出现定位重叠引发内耗,小众品牌很难破圈获得持续增长,中小品牌在中国市场盈利难度极高。

3. 可落地的解决方案方向:服务商可以针对中小品牌出海,提供海外本土化营销、渠道搭建的配套服务;针对品牌布局AI手机的需求,提供相关软硬件技术配套服务;针对头部品牌的新赛道布局,提供对应的供应链、运营配套服务,抓住行业转型的红利。

本文分析了手机行业的最新格局变化,给手机相关渠道、电商平台的干货内容整理如下:

1. 品牌对平台的核心需求:出海品牌需要平台提供海外本土化的电商渠道和流量支持;线上性价比品牌高度依赖线上平台的流量曝光对接目标用户;推出创新AI产品的品牌需要平台给予专属流量扶持,触达对新产品感兴趣的消费者。

2. 平台招商与运营方向:招商可以重点倾斜头部品牌的AI手机、折叠屏手机等创新品类,同时对接出海品牌的海外渠道业务,拓展新的增长曲线;运营层面可以针对创新产品开辟专属流量阵地,帮助品牌对接精准用户。

3. 风险规避方向:中小小众品牌的生存风险较高,平台在招商合作时需要评估品牌的背景与资金实力,提前规避小众品牌退场带来的售后、库存等后续问题;存量市场下平台侧重服务头部品牌,匹配头部品牌的新赛道布局需求,稳定自身基本盘。

本文记录了中国智能手机行业的最新格局变动,梳理了产业新动向与新问题,对产业研究的干货内容如下:

1. 产业发展新动向:当前中国手机行业正式进入存量博弈阶段,用户平均换机周期已经延长至近3年半,头部品牌集中度已经达到96.4%,小众品牌逐步出清;AI成为行业新的核心增长赛道,多家头部厂商已经布局自研终端大模型、AI手机,同时车机智能化、折叠屏也成为品牌转型的重要方向。

2. 行业出现的新问题:多品牌战略下容易出现子品牌定位重叠,引发同体系内耗;纯性价比定位的品牌在中国充分竞争的市场环境下,很难突破增长瓶颈实现破圈;AI发展推高存储芯片成本,全行业利润都受到挤压,这些都是行业需要解决的新问题。

3. 值得研究的商业模式与战略:大型母品牌推出多品牌分层占位,共享供应链降低成本的作战模式;小众品牌在国内市场饱和后,战略性收缩集中资源深耕海外市场的战略选择,都是值得深入研究的新商业模式与战略路径。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article covers the event of OPPO’s sub-brand realme exiting China’s smartphone market and its broader industry context, with key takeaways summarized below:

1. Core event: realme has officially announced it will suspend new product releases in the Chinese market, with sales and after-sales services taken over by OPPO. The brand will redirect its resources to focus on expanding overseas markets. To date, realme has sold over 300 million units globally, but its market share in China has fallen below 1%.

2. Core reasons for realme’s retreat: The average smartphone replacement cycle in China has extended to nearly 3.5 years, turning mobile phones from fast-moving consumer goods into durable goods. The market is now defined by cutthroat competition for existing users, with the top six brands controlling 96.4% of the market share, leaving almost no room for smaller niche players. realme positioned itself solely as a low-price, high-specification brand, resulting in unbalanced product lines, poor build quality, and failure to build broad brand recognition. It also overlapped in positioning with OnePlus, another OPPO ecosystem brand, ultimately leading to its exit from the mainstream Chinese market.

3. New industry trends: AI has emerged as a new growth driver for the smartphone industry, with all major players developing AI-powered phones and proprietary large language models. Foldable displays and in-vehicle infotainment systems have also become key areas of exploration.

This article outlines the latest landscape and consumer trends of China’s smartphone industry, distilling key lessons for brand strategy, summarized below:

1. Current industry and consumer trends: Smartphones have transitioned from fast-moving consumer goods to durable goods, with user replacement cycles extending significantly. The industry has shifted from a growing market to zero-sum competition for existing users, with extremely high concentration among top players: the six largest brands hold 96.4% of the market share, and product homogenization is severe. The rise of AI has pushed up memory chip costs and squeezed profit margins, while also opening up new growth opportunities.

2. Lessons for brand positioning: As an online value sub-brand designed to compete with Xiaomi, realme relied solely on a value proposition that failed to meet Chinese consumers’ demand for a well-rounded experience encompassing performance, imaging, and build quality. It failed to build broad brand awareness, its core user base has limited purchasing power leaving little room for sustained growth, and it suffered from internal competition due to overlapping positioning with another brand in the same corporate ecosystem, ultimately leading to its exit.

3. Actionable strategic takeaways: A multi-brand layered strategy enables shared supply chains and lower costs. When the domestic market is saturated, strategic contraction to focus on high-growth overseas markets is a viable path. AI, foldable phones and connected car systems are promising new sectors for brand布局.

This article analyzes the ongoing shift in China’s smartphone market landscape, identifies market opportunities and risks, with key insights for mobile phone sellers summarized below:

1. Risk alert for the domestic market: China’s smartphone market is now defined by intense competition for existing users, with top brands controlling the vast majority of market share, leaving minimal room for small and mid-sized brands. Only a small number of value-focused players backed by large parent brands can survive in the pure value segment, and single-minded value positioning offers limited long-term growth. Entering the niche smartphone segment in China carries extremely high risk.

2. New growth opportunities: AI has become a new growth engine for the smartphone industry. AI-powered phones, on-device large models, foldable displays, feature-specific phones, and in-vehicle infotainment systems are all new growth areas, with high consumer acceptance of these innovative products and significant untapped market potential.

3. New areas for expansion: While the domestic market is saturated, overseas markets still offer substantial room for growth. Going offshore leveraging the parent brand’s supply chain is a feasible growth path. Sellers can partner with overseas-focused brands to tap into unmet demand in international markets.

This article analyzes shifting demand and market structure in the smartphone industry, with key takeaways for handset manufacturing suppliers summarized below:

1. Shifting product and design requirements: Chinese consumers now demand well-rounded devices rather than products that prioritize just specifications, and are no longer satisfied with value-focused devices that trade build quality for raw performance. They expect balanced performance across specs, imaging, and build quality, so manufacturers need to adapt their production capabilities to support this demand for all-around balanced product design.

2. Actionable business opportunities: As market share continues to concentrate among top brands, the share of orders from leading brands will keep rising. Factories can deepen partnerships and tie their business more closely to top brands. At the same time, the rapid growth of new segments including AI phones, foldable devices and in-vehicle smart hardware will generate substantial new production demand, so manufacturers can prepare in advance to adapt to new production requirements.

3. Insights for digitalization and supply chain management: The model of shared production facilities, shared supply chains and centralized purchasing across multiple brands can effectively reduce production costs and capture economies of scale. Factories can advance digitally integrated production to accommodate the demand for multi-brand, multi-category manufacturing and improve operational efficiency.

This article outlines development trends and core pain points in the smartphone industry, with key takeaways for smartphone-related service providers summarized below:

1. Industry development trends: The smartphone industry has transitioned from a growing market to zero-sum competition for existing users, with market share highly concentrated among top brands. AI is set to become the core growth driver for the industry, with AI-powered devices, on-device large models, in-vehicle intelligence and foldable phones widely recognized as the main areas of industry exploration.

2. Core pain points for industry clients: Key challenges for smartphone brands include limited growth headroom in a saturated market, surging memory chip costs driven by AI development that squeeze profit margins, internal friction from overlapping positioning in multi-brand portfolios, the difficulty niche brands face building broad awareness to achieve sustained growth, and the extremely low probability of small and mid-sized brands turning a profit in China’s market.

3. Actionable solution directions: Service providers can offer localized marketing and channel development support for small and mid-sized brands expanding overseas. They can provide supporting software and hardware technical services for brands developing AI phones, and offer supply chain and operational support for top brands entering new segments, to capture growth opportunities from industry transformation.

This article analyzes the latest shifts in China’s smartphone market landscape, with key takeaways for mobile phone distribution channels and e-commerce platforms summarized below:

1. Core brand demands for platforms: Overseas-focused brands require platforms to provide localized e-commerce channels and traffic support overseas. Online value brands rely heavily on platform traffic exposure to reach their target users. Brands launching innovative AI products need dedicated traffic support from platforms to connect with consumers interested in new offerings.

2. Directions for platform merchant recruitment and operations: Platforms can prioritize recruiting top brands’ innovative products such as AI phones and foldable handsets, while partnering with overseas-focused brands to support their cross-border business and unlock new growth. For operations, platforms can create dedicated traffic zones for innovative products to help brands reach their target users more effectively.

3. Risk mitigation directions: Small and niche brands carry high survival risk, so platforms should evaluate brands’ background and financial strength during recruitment to avoid post-exit issues such as unhandled after-sales requests and excess inventory. In a saturated market, platforms should prioritize serving top brands, align with their new segment expansion strategies, and stabilize their core business.

This paper documents the latest structural shifts in China’s smartphone industry, outlines new industry trends and emerging challenges, with key insights for industry researchers summarized below:

1. New industry development trends: China’s smartphone industry has now fully entered a phase of competition for existing users. The average replacement cycle has extended to nearly 3.5 years, the concentration ratio among top brands has reached 96.4%, and niche brands are progressively exiting the market. AI has become the new core growth track, with multiple leading players already developing proprietary on-device large models and AI-powered phones, while in-vehicle intelligence and foldable displays have also become key directions for brand transformation.

2. New emerging industry challenges: Multi-brand strategies often lead to overlapping positioning for sub-brands, triggering internal competition within the same corporate group. Pure value-positioned brands struggle to break through growth bottlenecks and build broad awareness in China’s hyper-competitive market. AI development has driven up memory chip costs, squeezing profit margins across the entire industry. All of these are new challenges the industry must address.

3. Business models and strategies worth further study: The multi-brand layered positioning strategy used by large parent brands, which cuts costs via shared supply chains, and the strategic choice of niche brands to shrink domestic operations and concentrate resources on deepening overseas expansion amid domestic market saturation, are both new business models and strategic paths that merit further in-depth research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

“轻骑兵”打不赢“阵地战”。

|朱之丛

你有多久没换过手机了?

中国信通院给出的最新数据是40.2个月——将近三年半。把范围放大到全球,用户平均换机周期更是超过4年。越来越多消费者选择成为手机“钉子户”,有用户直言:“手机性能早就过剩了,够用就行。”

对消费者来说,手机正在从快消品转向耐用品;对手机品牌来说,这意味着一场无法置身事外的残酷洗牌。

OPPO旗下子品牌realme(真我),就是近期倒下的多米诺骨牌之一。

7月16日,realme副总裁徐起发布了一封致用户公开信,宣告realme将在中国市场暂停产品更新,销售、售后等环节交给母品牌OPPO接手,realme将集中资源,深耕海外市场。

在竞争激烈的中国智能手机市场,realme存在感相对薄弱。但在海外市场,它曾是一匹高歌猛进的“黑马”:问世仅1年,realme全球出货量就突破2500万台,在印度市场排名第四,年增长率超过500%。

“步步高系”强大的渠道能力,为realme的出海之路打下了扎实的底子。在产品端,realme主打低价高配,面向预算有限、追求极致性能的“参数党”。OPPO之所以祭出这款“性价比杀手”,正是为了在下沉市场狙击自己的老对手——小米。

但风头过后,realme终究没能在拼杀最激烈的本土市场证明自己。2025年末,经历了7年角逐的realme在中国的市占率已低于1%。随着市场份额不断向头部集中,realme、魅族等多个品牌不得不退出商业舞台,在别处另谋增长。

诚如徐起在公开信中所说:“这是一次理性的转身。”但在转身之后,realme、OPPO乃至所有手机厂商都必须思考下一个问题:AI来势汹汹、存储成本暴涨、换机周期延长,品牌该如何在这样的新常态中存活到终局?

天下网商

OPPO的“轻骑兵”

Realme是带着使命“降生”的:剑指海外市场,迎击老对手小米。

2018年,OPPO时任副总裁李炳忠带队创立了realme品牌,在印度市场上线了第一款手机Realme 1。这款机型采用了当时较为领先的处理器联发科P60,但售价仅为8990卢比(当前约合人民币632元),切中了印度电商需求量最大的价位,立刻成为爆款。

彼时,小米是印度市场的“头号玩家”,尤其在线上渠道占据绝对优势。OPPO、vivo和三星只能在占整体市场容量55%的线下渠道竞争。

因此,OPPO推出realme的用意相当明确:以性价比机型开辟线上市场,作为突袭小米和红米的“轻骑兵”。

此后,realme以接近4个月一款的速度快速上新,在千元机领域先撕开突破口,然后逐渐把价格上探到全价位。为了争取年轻消费群体,realme的印度CEO还在大学校园里召开发布会,并邀请数码KOL现场拆机测评。

清晰的产品定位和营销策略,让realme迅速在海外市场打出了声量。

数据显示,2019年,realme全球手机出货量已突破2500万台,同比增长500%,它在印度市场份额位居第4名,线上份额仅次于小米。2021年,realme宣布全球累计销量超过1亿台,跃居全球手机市场销量第6名。截至目前,realme全球累计销量突破3亿台。

从全局来看,realme进一步补全了OPPO的品牌版图。有从业者把这种战术称为“大OPPO体系作战”:OPPO负责线下渠道,Realme偏向线上,一加进攻高端市场。

在供应端,这也能发挥整个大OPPO体系的协同效应。在印度北方邦的诺伊达市,OPPO、一加、Realme这三个品牌共用同一片厂区,共享供应链和集中化采购,这与手机作为快消品的规模效应相得益彰。

天下网商

一次注定的撤退

Realme败退中国市场,也可以说是一种必然。徐起曾坦言:“中国市场盈利非常困难。”

最直观的原因,当然是数据层面看不到回报:2024年,realme在中国的市占率仅为1.22%;到2025年第四季度,这个数据已跌破1%。

在数据背后,realme在中国市场的失语有多方面原因:

首先,中国手机市场已经进入高烈度竞争,单纯在性能上做差异化,无法再说服挑剔的消费者买单。

在海外,realme喊出的口号是“敢越级”:把旗舰芯片下放给千元机,同时在质感上作出一定牺牲,采用低配摄像头、塑料中框等廉价方案。这命中了一部分数码爱好者的痛点。

但在中国这个竞争更充分的市场,消费者的选择往往是“既要又要”:性能、摄像、机身质感,哪一项都不能偏废。Realme势必要面对产品力更全面、供应链更成熟的对手,其中甚至包括自己的“兄弟品牌”一加。

其次,realme的品牌认知始终没能提级和破圈。在中国,realme主打的“极致性价比”标签成为一把双刃剑,它瞄准的核心用户圈层年龄小、预算低,其真实购买力和影响力有限,增长后劲不足。

不过,这也不是独属于realme一家的困境。中国手机市场这片“红海”,已经把越来越多产品力不足的玩家挤下了牌桌。

曾经在“游戏手机”细分赛道内占据70%份额的黑鲨,自2022年起就销声匿迹;以“小而美”的设计美学著称的魅族,宣布暂停手机业务、向AI领域转型;只有iQOO、红米、一加等少数几个性价比品牌,还在母品牌的支撑下深耕细分人群。

数据显示,2026年第二季度,华为、苹果、OPPO、vivo、小米、荣耀六大手机厂商合计吃掉了中国市场96.4%的份额。在这个品牌分治格局确立的时代,realme战略性撤出中国、全身心投入海外市场,不失为明智之举。

官宣退出中国市场后,原本平缓下滑的二手realme价格出现了一定波动。Realme粉丝也纷纷现身,在徐起的微博评论区发出感怀:“纯粹的性价比手机,以后再也买不到了”“目前用过最好的安卓机品牌,没想到成为了绝唱”。

天下网商

到终局的距离

在信息化时代,手机几乎已成为人们的“外置器官”。

QuestMobile发布的报告显示,2025年,中国移动互联网月活跃用户数达到12.76亿,人均单日使用时长接近8小时。通讯社交、本地生活、影音娱乐……对现代人来说,手机是毫无疑问的刚需。

但同时,中国智能手机市场已经见顶,各家产品也开始趋于同质化,手机行业从增量市场转入存量博弈。AI产业崛起导致的存储芯片成本暴涨,更是切实威胁到了各家手机厂商的利润水平。

不过,AI既是冲击,也是机遇。

在性能、影像等方向“卷”到极致后,AI成为了手机品牌的下一个增长风口。华为盘古、小米MiMo、vivo蓝心、OPPO安第斯……各家厂商纷纷推出自研大模型,试图在离终端最近的地方打造AI第一入口。

为了抢占市场,专业大模型厂商也开始下场做手机。2025年,与努比亚合作的第一代豆包AI手机问世,运用GUI Agent技术帮助用户操作App,自主完成复杂任务,在二手市场一度被炒到上万元的高价。近期,第二代豆包AI手机也在世界人工智能大会上展出。

除了AI智能体手机外,厂商还在更多技术方向上启动探索。华为通过自研芯片实现系统层面的软硬协同,在国内折叠屏手机市场已占据6成以上份额;荣耀的“机器人手机”在机身顶部加装机械云台,并配备智能体操作系统Agentic OS;就连魅族也在吉利汽车上改头换面,以Flyme Auto车机系统增强驾驶体验。

在这些品牌的争奇斗妍中,realme的“出局”似乎稍显落寞。

它就像一个偏科严重的学生:极致性能、激进调教,但质感不足、线下渠道缺失,和自家品牌一加的定位也出现重叠,最终无法战胜中国市场的“马太效应”。

但在全球范围内,realme依旧保有可观的市场份额。在完成这一轮战略收缩之后,OPPO如何在海外市场打好自己的手牌,把这支灵活的“轻骑兵”变成全能的“阵地战”选手,将是决定realme未来命运的关键。

注:文/天下网商,文章来源:天下网商(公众号ID:txws_txws),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:天下网商

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

realme为什么退出中国智能手机市场?

2025年末realme在中国的市占率已低于1%,国内手机市场竞争烈度高,消费者对产品性能、质感、影像等要求全面,realme主打极致性价比的定位受众购买力有限,品牌认知未能破圈,叠加中国市场盈利困难,因此选择暂停中国区产品更新,聚焦海外市场。

realme在海外市场表现如何?

realme主打高性价比机型,问世仅1年全球出货量就突破2500万台,印度市场排名第四,年增长率超500%;2021年全球累计销量超1亿台,跃居全球手机市场销量第6名,截至目前全球累计销量已突破3亿台,海外市场表现亮眼。

当前中国智能手机市场呈现什么格局?

当前中国智能手机市场已进入存量博弈阶段,用户平均换机周期达40.2个月,头部效应显著,2026年第二季度华为、苹果、OPPO、vivo、小米、荣耀六大厂商合计占据96.4%的市场份额,中小品牌生存空间被大幅挤压。

当前手机厂商的新增长方向有哪些?

AI是当前手机品牌的核心增长风口,各大厂商纷纷推出自研大模型布局AI手机,此外折叠屏手机、带机械云台的机器人手机、车机系统联动等也是各大厂商重点探索的技术方向。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0