广告
加载中

从“网红品牌”到“又贵又难吃” 老乡鸡离上市还有多远?

伯虎团队 2026-07-28 12:21
伯虎团队 2026/07/28 12:21

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心梳理了中式快餐品牌老乡鸡五年五次冲击IPO均失败的发展现状,拆解了背后的问题,核心干货信息如下:

1. 老乡鸡的发展历程:2003年成立于安徽合肥,原名肥西老母鸡,2012年正式更名老乡鸡,2020年靠疫情期间手撕员工降薪联名信、200元土味发布会走红,成为国民网红快餐品牌。

2. 当前口碑与经营情况:消费者对老乡鸡的核心槽点为量少价高口味不佳,2023年相关话题出圈后仅降价约2元,没能扭转负面口碑。近年营收、净利润增速持续下滑,毛利率长期徘徊在25%以下,远低于行业平均水平,四年内估值缩水近一半,上市前景仍不明朗。

本文围绕老乡鸡IPO折戟事件,透露出中式快餐品牌发展的诸多值得参考的经验与教训,核心干货如下:

1. 品牌营销层面:老乡鸡靠情感营销、低成本土味营销成功破圈成为网红品牌,但热度没能持续,说明网红品牌必须有匹配的产品力才能维持消费者好感,仅靠营销无法长期留住用户。

2. 定价与竞争层面:老乡鸡因重资产模式推高成本,定价超出消费者预期,小幅度降价没能扭转口碑,提醒品牌定价必须匹配消费者认知,顺应消费者对性价比的需求。

3. 行业层面:当前中式快餐赛道规模持续增长,2025年有望突破3000亿元,但已经进入微利时代,快速开放加盟扩张如果没有跑通单店盈利模型,会给品牌发展留下隐患。

本文清晰梳理了中式快餐赛道的发展现状、机会与风险,对餐饮卖家有较强的参考意义,核心干货如下:

1. 市场机会:中式米饭快餐属于刚性需求增长市场,2024年市场规模达2770亿元,同比增长10.2%,2025年有望突破3000亿元,整体消费人次高,店均流水仍呈上升趋势,仍有发展空间。

2. 风险提示:行业已经进入微利时代,市场极度分散,即便行业第一的市占率也仅0.9%,竞争十分激烈;社保合规、食品安全等问题是品牌发展的硬伤,会影响资本化进程甚至正常经营。

3. 可借鉴教训:全产业链重资产模式容易推高成本,拉低毛利率,加盟扩张需要先跑通单店盈利模型,不能盲目扩店,营销带来的热度必须匹配产品品质和性价比,否则容易快速流失消费者。

本文分析了中式快餐行业的发展现状,对餐饮供应链相关工厂的发展有诸多参考价值,核心干货如下:

1. 产品生产需求:当前中式快餐行业普遍追求标准化和成本控制,多数品牌选择外包食材采购、第三方仓储配送的轻资产模式,对第三方工厂的标准化食材供应、稳定品控的需求较高,给专业供应链工厂带来了明确的商业机会。

2. 需求增长趋势:老乡鸡等头部中式快餐品牌正快速开放加盟扩张门店,赛道整体规模持续增长,带动了上游食材生产、包装、物流配套等相关环节的需求提升,市场空间持续扩大。

3. 发展启示:老乡鸡自营全产业链的重资产模式推高了成本,导致长期盈利不足,说明专业分工是更优路径,工厂可以聚焦自身生产优势,为餐饮品牌提供标准化产品,依托中式快餐赛道的增长获得发展,同时需要匹配品牌对成本和合规的要求。

本文透露出当前中式快餐行业的发展趋势和核心痛点,对餐饮相关服务商把握市场需求有较高的参考价值,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:中式快餐赛道规模持续增长,品牌正处于从直营转向加盟扩张的阶段,多数品牌有资本化需求,同时行业整体进入微利时代,品牌对降本增效、合规运营的需求十分强烈。

2. 客户核心痛点:一是品牌快速开放加盟后,加盟体系管控能力不足,单店盈利模型难以跑通;二是不少品牌成本控制不佳,毛利率远低于行业平均水平,存在社保欠缴等合规问题,影响品牌资本化进程;三是很多网红品牌产品口碑跟不上营销热度,无法满足消费者对性价比的需求。

3. 业务方向:服务商可针对性开发加盟管控系统,帮助品牌管控门店品质,推出供应链优化服务帮助品牌降本,同时提供合规咨询服务,满足品牌上市的合规要求。

本文梳理了中式快餐赛道的行业发展和资本化现状,对相关平台的招商、运营和风险规避有参考意义,核心干货如下:

1. 品牌对平台的核心需求:多数头部中式快餐品牌有强烈的资本化需求,多次冲击上市,需要资本市场适配行业特性调整审核逻辑;品牌扩张过程中,也需要平台提供加盟运营管理、供应链资源对接等多方面支持。

2. 招商与运营方向:中式快餐赛道整体增长稳定,优质品牌资源多,有较大的招商空间,但平台需要调整品牌筛选标准,不再只看门店规模,要重点考察门店盈利可持续性、加盟管控能力、供应链壁垒、合规整改情况,筛选真正优质的品牌。

3. 风险规避:中式快餐行业存在市场分散、标准化难度高、区域天花板明显、微利化的特征,平台要警惕品牌单纯靠规模讲故事的风险,关注社保欠瘀、食品安全等合规问题,对扩张过快但单店盈利不佳的品牌保持审慎态度。

本文以老乡鸡五次IPO折戟为案例,剖析了当前中式快餐行业的发展新动向与资本化困境,对产业研究有较高的价值,核心干货如下:

1. 产业新动向:当前中式米饭快餐赛道规模持续增长,2025年市场规模有望突破3000亿元,行业整体进入微利时代,大量品牌冲击资本化,但中式快餐赛道迟迟未能跑出上市公司,和茶饮品牌的资本化热潮形成鲜明对比,成为值得研究的新现象。

2. 需要关注的新问题:行业本身存在市场极度分散、标准化难度高、区域天花板明显的特性;品牌层面存在重资产推高成本、加盟扩张快但单店盈利不成熟、合规问题长期得不到解决、营销与产品力不匹配等问题;资本市场审核逻辑已经转变,不再认可单纯的规模叙事,更关注核心盈利能力。

3. 研究启示:中式快餐的资本化路径和适合的商业模式仍待探索,品牌需要在消费者要求的高性价比和企业持续盈利之间找到平衡,监管层面也可针对中式快餐的行业特性优化相关审核标准。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines the current situation of Chinese fast-food brand Laoxiangji, which has failed to go public five times in five years, and breaks down the core issues behind its setbacks. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Laoxiangji’s development history: Founded in Hefei, Anhui in 2003 originally under the name Feixi Old Chicken, the brand officially changed its name to Laoxiangji in 2012. It went viral in 2020 after tearing up employees’ salary-cut petitions during the COVID-19 pandemic and hosting a "down-to-earth" press conference that cost only 200 yuan, establishing itself as a viral national fast-food brand.

2. Current reputation and operating performance: Consumers’ top complaints about Laoxiangji are small portion sizes, high prices and underwhelming taste. After related negative topics went viral in 2023, the brand only cut prices by roughly 2 yuan, which failed to reverse its negative reputation. In recent years, its revenue and net profit growth have continued to decline, and its gross margin has long stayed below 25% – far lower than the industry average. Its valuation has shrunk by nearly half in four years, and its path to an IPO remains unclear.

This article draws key lessons for Chinese fast-food brands from Laoxiangji’s failed IPO attempts. Core takeaways are as follows:

1. Brand marketing: Laoxiangji successfully broke into mainstream awareness through emotional marketing and low-cost "down-to-earth" viral campaigns, but failed to sustain its popularity. This demonstrates that viral brands must back up their marketing buzz with matching product strength to retain consumer goodwill; marketing alone cannot sustain long-term customer loyalty.

2. Pricing and competition: Laoxiangji’s heavy-asset model drove up costs, pushing its pricing beyond consumer expectations, and a small price cut failed to repair its reputation. This serves as a reminder that brand pricing must align with consumer perception and meet consumer demand for value for money.

3. Industry outlook: China’s Chinese fast-food track continues to grow in scale, and is expected to exceed 300 billion yuan by 2025, but the industry has entered an era of thin profit margins. Rapid franchise expansion will leave hidden risks for brand development if a profitable unit-economy model has not been validated first.

This article clearly outlines the current state, opportunities and risks of China’s Chinese fast-food track, offering valuable insights for food service sellers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Market opportunities: Chinese rice fast food is a growing market driven by rigid demand. It reached 277 billion yuan in 2024, up 10.2% year-on-year, and is projected to exceed 300 billion yuan in 2025. The sector boasts high overall consumer traffic, and average store revenue continues to climb, leaving room for new growth.

2. Risk warnings: The industry has entered an era of thin profit margins and remains extremely fragmented. Even the market leader holds only a 0.9% market share, making competition extremely intense. Compliance issues such as social insurance contributions and food safety are critical vulnerabilities that can derail a brand’s path to capitalization and even disrupt normal operations.

3. Actionable lessons: A full-supply-chain heavy-asset model tends to drive up costs and drag down gross margins. Franchise expansion requires validating a profitable unit-economy model first, rather than blind store expansion. Marketing-driven buzz must be matched by product quality and value for money, otherwise consumers will churn quickly.

This article analyzes the current state of China’s Chinese fast-food industry, offering key references for factories in the food service supply chain. Core takeaways are as follows:

1. Product demand: Chinese fast-food brands generally pursue standardization and cost control today. Most have adopted an asset-light model by outsourcing ingredient procurement and third-party warehousing and distribution, creating strong demand for standardized ingredient supplies and stable quality control from third-party factories. This opens clear commercial opportunities for specialized supply chain factories.

2. Demand growth trends: Leading Chinese fast-food brands including Laoxiangji are rapidly expanding their store networks via franchising, and the overall track continues to grow in scale. This has lifted demand for upstream links including ingredient production, packaging and logistics support, continuously expanding the overall market space.

3. Strategic insights: Laoxiangji’s vertically integrated heavy-asset model drove up costs and led to chronically weak profitability, demonstrating that specialized division of labor is a more efficient path. Factories can lean into their own production advantages, provide standardized products for food service brands, and grow alongside the expansion of the Chinese fast-food track, while aligning with brands’ requirements for cost control and compliance.

This article identifies the current development trends and core pain points of China’s Chinese fast-food industry, offering valuable references for food service-related service providers to capture market demand. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: The Chinese fast-food track is growing steadily in scale, and brands are in a transition from direct operation to franchise expansion. Most brands have capitalization goals, and as the industry enters an era of thin margins, demand for cost reduction, efficiency improvement and compliant operations is extremely strong.

2. Core client pain points: First, many brands lack sufficient franchise system management capabilities after rapid expansion, and struggle to build a profitable unit-economy model. Second, many brands fail to control costs effectively, with gross margins far below the industry average, and face compliance issues such as unpaid social insurance that threaten their capitalization plans. Third, many viral marketing-driven brands fail to match their marketing buzz with positive product reputation, and cannot meet consumer demand for value for money.

3. Strategic business directions: Service providers can develop targeted franchise management systems to help brands maintain store quality, launch supply chain optimization services to help brands cut costs, and offer compliance consulting services to meet the regulatory requirements for public listing.

This article outlines the industry development and capitalization status of China’s Chinese fast-food track, offering references for related platforms on investment attraction, operations and risk mitigation. Core takeaways are as follows:

1. Core demands from brands: Most leading Chinese fast-food brands have strong capitalization demand and have repeatedly attempted to go public, and they expect capital markets to adjust their review frameworks to fit the industry’s characteristics. During expansion, brands also need platforms to provide support in areas including franchise operation management and supply chain resource matching.

2. Investment attraction and operation directions: The Chinese fast-food track boasts stable overall growth, abundant high-quality brand resources and large room for investment attraction. However, platforms need to adjust their brand screening criteria: instead of focusing solely on store count, they should prioritize evaluating the sustainability of store profitability, franchise management capabilities, supply chain barriers and compliance rectification status to select truly high-quality brands.

3. Risk mitigation: The Chinese fast-food industry is characterized by market fragmentation, high standardization difficulties, clear regional growth ceilings and thin profit margins. Platforms should guard against the risk of brands overstating their value purely based on scale, pay close attention to compliance issues such as unpaid social insurance and food safety, and maintain a cautious attitude toward brands that expand rapidly but suffer from unprofitable store-level operations.

This article uses Laoxiangji’s five failed IPO attempts as a case study to analyze the new development trends and capitalization dilemmas of China’s current Chinese fast-food industry, offering high value for industrial research. Core takeaways are as follows:

1. New industry trends: China’s Chinese rice fast-food track continues to grow in scale, and is expected to exceed 300 billion yuan by 2025. The industry as a whole has entered an era of thin margins, with a large number of brands pursuing capitalization. However, no major Chinese fast-food brand has successfully gone public yet, a sharp contrast to the capitalization boom for tea beverage brands that makes this a noteworthy new phenomenon for research.

2. Key emerging issues: The industry itself is characterized by extreme fragmentation, high standardization difficulties and clear regional growth ceilings. At the brand level, common problems include inflated costs from heavy-asset models, rapid franchise expansion paired with unproven unit-level profitability, long unresolved compliance issues, and a mismatch between marketing hype and product strength. Capital markets have also shifted their review frameworks, and no longer reward pure growth-by-scale narratives, instead prioritizing core profitability.

3. Research implications: The capitalization path and optimal business model for Chinese fast-food remain to be explored. Brands need to find a balance between consumers’ demand for high value for money and sustainable corporate profitability, while regulators could also optimize review standards to fit the unique characteristics of the Chinese fast-food industry.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

来源 | 伯虎财经(bohuFN)

作者 | 林恩

老乡鸡今年1月8日提交的招股书,近期又失效了。

这已经是老乡鸡五年里第五次寻求上市,但均无果而返。前两次是冲A股,后三次是奔港股。

上市一直不通过,老乡鸡到底怎么了?

老乡鸡走红以后

老乡鸡成立于2003年,第一家门店开设于安徽合肥,名为“肥西老母鸡”。2012年,正式更名为“老乡鸡”。

不过,老乡鸡真正走红是2020年。

2020年疫情时期,许多餐饮品牌经历经营危机。彼时,老乡鸡公司关停超400家门店,损失预估超5亿元。员工主动申请“不要工资”后,束从轩在镜头前亲手撕掉联名信,并喊话“哪怕是卖房卖车,也要确保你们有饭吃、有班上”。

这则视频让老乡鸡一战成名。随后,一场“200元土味攻略发布会”,更是让老乡鸡坐稳了“网红品牌”的地位。

“咯咯哒”成为了老乡鸡与网友的互动暗号。

不过,这份热度与好感目前看来并没有持续太久。近期,随着#老乡鸡五年五次IPO折戟#登上热搜,底下热评几乎围绕“量少又贵还难吃”这一吐槽展开。事实上,这一不满情绪早已持续许久。

2023年,“月薪两万不敢在老乡鸡点三个肉菜”的话题走红。面对质疑,束从轩回复,“确实贵了,我们改”。

老乡鸡确实在调整,数据显示,老乡鸡直营店客单价从2022年的29.7元降至2025年前8个月的27.5元,加盟店同期从31.5元降至29.2元。不过,约2元的降价幅度,能否改变老乡鸡在消费者心中的形象?从热评来看,貌似暂未改变。

更重要的是,一些信号已经传递至经营数据端。

这几年,老乡鸡的营收增速持续下滑。

2022年至2024年,老乡鸡营收分别为45.28亿元、56.51亿元、62.88亿元。同比增速分别为58.38%、24.80%、11.27%,下滑十分明显。到2025年前8个月,营收45.78亿元,同比增速降至10.9%。

净利润与毛利率数据也越来越不好看。2022年至2024年,老乡鸡净利润分别为2.52亿元、3.75亿元、4.09亿元,同比增速分别为86.67%、48.81%、9.07%;毛利率分别为20.3%、23.3%、22.8%,始终徘徊在25%以下。

相比之下,行业平均水平在60%以上,已上市的小菜园毛利率超65%,乡村基超56%,绿茶集团近69%。

不少观察者指出,老乡鸡的一大阻碍在于其全产业链重资产模式。

当下,大多数中式快餐以外包食材采购、第三方仓储配送为主,资产投入较轻。但老乡鸡选择自建养殖基地、区域中央厨房、专属冷链物流,打通从源头养殖到终端出餐全流程。

这决定了成本高居不下、耗材难以避免——这一模式的相关支出占老乡鸡营收四成以上。

老乡鸡的应对方式,是从直营迈向加盟。2020年,老乡鸡开启加盟模式。

截至2025年8月底,其加盟店从2022年底的118家增至733家,占门店总数从不到一成提升至44%。其中,一部分门店由直营店转换而来。

需要指出的是,加盟店贡献了44%的门店数量,但产生的营收只占到20.6%。不难看出,单店盈利模型尚未形成。

老乡鸡的上市困境,属于整个行业

老乡鸡所处的中式快餐赛道,竞争格外激烈。

据红餐大数据,2024年中式米饭快餐市场规模达到2770亿元,同比增长10.2%。随着刚需型餐饮消费需求的持续攀升,中式米饭快餐的增长趋势预计将持续,其市场规模有望在2025年突破3000亿元。

按2024年交易总额计算,老乡鸡以0.9%的市场占有率位居中式快餐行业第一。窄门餐眼数据显示,老乡鸡目前共有1862家门店,而2022年则有1125家。

可以看到,快餐市场极度分散,即使位列行业第一,老乡鸡的市场占比也不过0.9%。

与此同时,中式快餐赛道已经步入“微利时代”。

为吸引更多顾客,近年来许多中式快餐品牌采取主动降价或推出高性价比的产品及套餐策略。

结果便是,尽管中式米饭快餐的人均消费价格呈现下滑趋势,但因中式米饭快餐的消费人次依然较高,门店的店均流水呈现上升趋势。

但拦不住品牌的利润越来越低。老乡鸡虽然仍保持盈利,但毛利率长期低于同行,且面临社保合规等成本压力。老娘舅2025年陷入净亏损状态,毛利率降至8.8.%。

事实上,老乡鸡多次上市未果,并非单个品牌的困境,这背后是整个中式快餐赛道的资本化困境。

2022年,老娘舅首次冲击沪市主板,历经一年多审核后最终折戟,随后转战新三板谋求北交所机会。

归根结底,中式快餐市场极度分散,标准化难度高,区域天花板明显。过去几年,蜜雪冰城、古茗、茶百道等茶饮品牌相继登陆资本市场,完成敲钟。反观中式快餐赛道,迟迟跑不出一家上市公司。

一方面是行业性质使然,另一方面也离不开资本市场对中式快餐审视标准的变化。

虎嗅APP提到,港股当下的餐饮审核逻辑,不再仅仅看重门店的规模,而是更加关注门店盈利的可持续性、加盟体系的管控能力、底层供应链的壁垒、历史合规问题的整改落地情况。

在老乡鸡上市遇阻的原因中,不乏社保欠缴、食品安全、家族控股等显性因素,但与此同时,中式快餐的发展模型困境也逐渐引发外界关注。

餐饮及食品行业分析师林岳指出,老乡鸡IPO屡次折戟是自身增长失速所致,资本市场对其“规模叙事”产生了质疑,另外,老乡鸡在证监会关心的合规问题上,一直没有显著的改善,比如员工社保公积金缺口逐年扩大,这是寻求上市的一大硬伤。

屡次冲刺IPO,屡次以败告终。一来一回下,老乡鸡所处的环境和地位也早已发生变化。

2022年冲刺A股时市场给出181亿元估值;2024年1月,麦星投资与广发乾和以约1.53亿元清仓退出;2025年6月胡润《全球独角兽榜》显示估值约90亿元。

4年里估值蒸发近90亿元,缩水一半。

对于老乡鸡而言,上市失败或许不是终点,而是再一次审视自身发展的契机。尽管中式快餐的资本化困境已摆在眼前,但老乡鸡仍有希望从“好吃不贵”与“持续盈利”之间,找到平衡点,并将其变成突破点。

参考资料:

1、慢放:老乡鸡的里子和面子

2、羊城晚报:老乡鸡五次折戟资本市场

3、虎嗅APP:老乡鸡第五次上市失利

4、新华网:《中式米饭快餐品类发展报告2025》:小炒、卤肉饭等走红,现炒+烟火气成流量密码

5、观察者网:五战五败,估值腰斩,老乡鸡为何始终端不上资本的餐桌?

6、雷递:老乡鸡冲刺港股:前8个月营收45.8亿 净利3.7亿 为束从轩家族企业

注:文/伯虎团队,文章来源:伯虎财经(公众号ID:bohuFN),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:伯虎财经

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

老乡鸡多次IPO失败的原因是什么?

老乡鸡五次IPO折戟,一方面是自身增长失速,营收、净利润增速持续下滑,毛利率长期低于行业平均水平,社保欠缴、食品安全、家族控股等合规问题未得到显著改善;另一方面也受中式快餐赛道整体分散、标准化难度高、资本化门槛提升的行业环境影响。

中式快餐行业当前发展现状是怎样的?

2024年中式米饭快餐市场规模达2770亿元,同比增长10.2%,预计2025年突破3000亿元,但赛道极度分散,头部品牌老乡鸡市场占有率仅0.9%,行业已步入微利时代,多数品牌毛利率较低,资本化进程普遍受阻。

老乡鸡的全产业链重资产模式有什么特点?

老乡鸡选择自建养殖基地、区域中央厨房、专属冷链物流,打通从源头养殖到终端出餐全流程,该模式相关支出占营收四成以上,导致成本居高不下,毛利率长期低于25%,远低于60%的行业平均水平。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0