广告
加载中

抖音网红李要得和前女友开撕 猛料满天飞

赵云合 2026-07-16 10:38
赵云合 2026/07/16 10:38

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心是曝光爆火抖音网红李要得与前女友周兴兴的情感互撕事件,同时梳理了网红圈靠情感炒作博流量的行业现状。

1. 事件核心内容:李要得凭借重庆到拉萨的出租车出行视频爆火,点赞破两千万,涨粉超两百万,当前粉丝逼近五百万,开通抖音橱窗已经售出11万件商品,还将获得官方50万宣传奖励,爆火后前女友周兴兴爆料其不抚养孩子、出轨,李要得回应称女方是蹭流量被拒后恶意污蔑,目前双方各执一词,多数网友站李要得,质疑女方炒作。

2. 行业干货提醒:靠情感狗血剧情博流量属于高危模式,不具备长期可持续性,很容易人设崩塌断送职业道路,普通网友吃瓜要保持理性,不要被别有用心的人当流量工具。

本文揭露了当前网红营销领域的常见套路与风险,对品牌选择网红合作、布局营销有较强参考价值。

1. 当前网红起号变现的常见套路:不少网红抓住大众猎奇吃瓜的心理,靠情感纠纷、私人恩怨炒作获得爆发式流量,短时间就能完成涨粉、变现,案例中韦雪靠情史炒作一个月带货1亿,积累近千万粉丝,变现能力稳定。

2. 这类营销模式的风险:依靠低俗炒作获得的流量非常脆弱,很容易出现人设崩塌,甚至被平台封号,最终彻底丧失商业价值,黄一鸣反复炒作被封号就是典型案例。

3. 品牌方启示:当前网友对这类炒作已经产生审美疲劳,品牌合作选网红时要避开靠低俗炒作起家的网红,避免风波牵连品牌口碑,尽量选择人设稳定、内容正向的网红合作。

本文分析了个人IP赛道的流量机会与风险,对做网红带货的卖家有明确的指导意义。

1. 流量机会:当前短视频平台猎奇类内容受众基础大,情感纠纷题材自带流量,哪怕是蹭热度的素人也能快速涨粉,本次事件中周兴兴蹭热度后短时间就涨粉到14.4万,新晋爆火网红很快就能实现十万级以上的销量,适合素人快速起号。

2. 风险提示:靠情感炒作属于高危商业模式,不仅容易遭遇网友信任危机,还会触发平台监管,一旦翻车就会被封号,彻底断送变现路径,黄一鸣多次账号被封就是典型教训。

3. 正确发展路径:靠热点起号后要及时转型,提升内容和带货专业度,像韦雪后期转型为家乡宣传,提升带货专业度,稳住了长期变现能力;爆火遭遇负面后及时公开回应,能获得网友的理解与人设维护。

本文反映了当前短视频电商的流量特征,给供货工厂对接网红、开发产品带来不少启示。

1. 商业机会:当前短视频网红起号速度极快,一个爆款内容就能带来千万级曝光、数百万涨粉,很快就能实现十万级以上的销量,本次事件中李要得爆火后橱窗很快卖出11万件商品,工厂如果能及时对接新晋优质网红,就能快速获得大量订单,实现产品起量。

2. 合作风险提示:网红流量的不确定性很高,靠低俗情感炒作起家的网红很容易翻车,一旦网红出事,合作供货的工厂也会被牵连,导致产品口碑下滑、库存积压。

3. 产品开发启示:当前接地气的风格内容更容易爆火,李要得就是靠接地气的川渝风格出圈,工厂开发网红带货产品时,要贴合大众喜好,打造接地气、适配网红带品节奏的爆品,同时要优先对接内容正向的网红,降低合作风险。

本文揭示了当前网红服务领域的新需求与痛点,给to B的服务商带来不少参考。

1. 行业发展新趋势:当前短视频网红赛道竞争激烈,越来越多网红靠情感炒作起号,同时新晋爆火网红经常遭遇负面爆料,催生了新的服务需求,相关赛道还有市场空间。

2. 客户核心痛点:新晋爆火网红大多缺乏危机应对经验,遭遇蹭流量、黑料爆料时,处理不当很容易人设崩塌,影响长期变现;不少靠炒作起号的网红也不知道怎么转型,难以维持长期商业价值。

3. 对应解决方案:服务商可以针对网红群体推出专属危机公关服务,帮助网红快速应对负面事件,维护自身人设;同时推出转型运营服务,帮助靠热点起号的网红调整内容方向,从低俗炒作转向合规长期变现,延长网红商业寿命,获得长期收益。

本文反映了当前短视频平台内容生态存在的问题,给平台运营管理、风向规避带来不少启示。

1. 当前内容生态存在的核心问题:越来越多的从业者将私人情感家事搬到平台,靠互撕炒作收割流量,把平台当成舆论审判场,不仅消耗用户注意力,还带坏了平台内容风气,真假难辨的炒作也容易引发用户不满。

2. 这类内容的负面影响:长期的炒作套路会让用户产生审美疲劳,降低用户对平台内容的信任度,也会影响平台的公众口碑,需要平台及时规范管理。

3. 平台运营优化方向:平台要加强内容监管,对恶意炒作、编造剧本蹭流量的账号进行处罚,像违规炒作的黄一鸣就被封号;同时要加大对正向优质内容的扶持,引导网红合规运营,优化平台内容风向,给用户更好的内容体验。

本文展现了当前国内短视频网红产业的新动向与新问题,对产业研究有较高的参考价值。

1. 产业新动向:当前网红行业诞生了新的流量变现商业模式,即通过炒作私人情感恩怨、前任互撕吸引流量,借助大众猎奇心理快速涨粉,最终通过直播打赏、带货实现变现,这种模式门槛低、起号快,成为很多素人进入网红行业的捷径。

2. 产业新问题:这种炒作模式真假难辨,不仅消耗了公众的信任感,也扰乱了网红行业的正常秩序,增加了平台监管的难度,部分从业者为了流量无底线炒作,甚至消费未成年孩子,违背公序良俗。

3. 产业发展启示:未来网红产业规范发展,需要行业出台相关自律规则,平台要完善监管机制,打击恶意炒作行为,引导网红生产正向优质内容,同时也需要引导公众理性看待这类事件,避免被流量炒作裹挟,推动产业长期健康发展。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article centers on exposing the highly publicized public feud between viral Douyin influencer Li Yaode and his ex-girlfriend Zhou Xingxing, and provides an overview of the influencer industry’s common practice of chasing traffic through emotional sensationalism.

1. Core details of the incident: Li rose to fame after posting a video of his road trip from Chongqing to Lhasa by taxi. The video earned over 20 million likes, gained him more than 2 million new followers, and pushed his total follower count close to 5 million. He has already sold 110,000 products through his Douyin storefront and is set to receive an official 500,000 RMB promotion bonus. After his viral rise, Zhou accused Li of refusing to support their child and cheating on her. Li responded that Zhou is spreading malicious rumors after being rejected when she tried to piggyback on his fame. The two sides have stuck to their own stories, with a majority of netizens siding with Li and suspecting Zhou of seeking traffic through sensationalism.

2. Key takeaway for the public: Chasing traffic through salacious emotional drama is a high-risk strategy with no long-term sustainability, and it easily leads to reputational collapse that ends an influencer’s career. For general audiences, it is important to stay rational when consuming such drama and avoid being used as a traffic tool by parties with hidden agendas.

This article exposes common套路 and risks in the current influencer marketing space, offering valuable insights for brands selecting influencer partners and planning marketing campaigns.

1. Common套路 for rapid growth and monetization among influencers: Many influencers leverage the public’s appetite for gossip and drama to gain explosive traffic through sensationalized coverage of romantic disputes and personal feuds, enabling them to gain followers and monetize in a very short timeframe. For example, influencer Wei Xue gained nearly 1 million followers and generated 100 million RMB in GMV within one month purely through sensationalizing her romantic history, and has maintained stable monetization ever since.

2. Risks of this marketing model: Traffic gained through lowbrow sensationalism is extremely fragile. Influencers following this path face high risk of reputational collapse and even platform account bans, which permanently erase their commercial value. Huang Yiming, who was banned after repeated inappropriate sensationalism, is a representative example.

3. Key takeaways for brands: Audiences have already developed fatigue with this type of sensational content. Brands should avoid partnering with influencers who built their following on lowbrow sensationalism to prevent brand reputation damage from associated scandals, and prioritize partnering with influencers who have stable, positive public images.

This article analyzes traffic opportunities and risks in the personal influencer track, offering clear guidance for sellers engaged in influencer-led livestream commerce.

1. Traffic opportunities: Curiosity-driven content currently has a large built-in audience on short-video platforms, and content centered on romantic disputes inherently attracts traffic. Even unknown creators can gain followers rapidly by piggybacking on trending drama. In this specific incident, Zhou gained 144,000 followers in a short period just by leveraging Li’s viral fame. Newly viral influencers can quickly hit over 100,000 units in product sales, making this route suitable for new creators to launch their accounts quickly.

2. Risk warnings: Traffic generation through emotional sensationalism is a high-risk business model. It not only easily triggers a public trust crisis but also violates platform content regulations. A single misstep can lead to an account ban and permanently cut off all monetization paths. Huang Yiming’s repeated account bans serve as a clear cautionary tale.

3. Recommended long-term development path: Creators who launch their accounts via trending drama should pivot to sustainable content as soon as possible, and improve the quality of their content and product expertise. For example, Wei Xue later pivoted to promoting her hometown and improved her livestream sales professionalism, securing long-term stable monetization. When faced with negative press after going viral, a prompt, transparent public response can win public understanding and protect an influencer’s image.

This article outlines the current traffic characteristics of short-video e-commerce, offering key insights for supply factories working with influencers and developing new products.

1. Business opportunities: Influencers on short-video platforms can now grow extremely rapidly: a single viral piece of content can deliver 10 million+ impressions and several hundred thousand new followers, and translate into over 100,000 units in sales very quickly. In this incident, Li sold 110,000 products through his storefront shortly after going viral. If factories can connect with promising new influencers early, they can secure large orders and scale product sales rapidly.

2. Cooperation risk warnings: Influencer traffic is highly unpredictable, and influencers who built their following on salacious emotional sensationalism carry high risk of collapse. If an influencer gets caught in a scandal, supplying factories will also be affected, leading to damaged product reputation and unsold inventory.

3. Product development insights: Down-to-earth, relatable content is far more likely to go viral today—Li’s breakout success came from his approachable, authentic Sichuan-Chongqing style. When developing products for influencer livestream sales, factories should align with mainstream public preferences to build approachable hit products that fit influencers’ sales rhythm, and prioritize partnering with influencers who create positive, compliant content to reduce cooperation risk.

This article reveals new demand and pain points in the current influencer services industry, offering valuable reference for B2B service providers.

1. New industry trends: Competition in the short-video influencer track is intensifying, and a growing number of influencers now launch their accounts through emotional sensationalism. Meanwhile, newly viral influencers frequently face negative exposés, which has created new service demand and untapped market opportunities in related segments.

2. Core client pain points: Most newly viral influencers lack experience in crisis management. When faced with traffic piggybacking or negative exposés, poor handling easily leads to reputational collapse that harms long-term monetization. Many influencers who launched via sensationalism also lack clear guidance on how to pivot to sustainable content, making it hard for them to retain long-term commercial value.

3. Corresponding solutions: Service providers can launch dedicated crisis PR services for influencers, helping them respond to negative events quickly and protect their public image. They can also offer transition operation services to help initially trend-launched influencers adjust their content direction, shifting from lowbrow sensationalism to compliant, long-term monetization. This extends influencers’ commercial lifespans and delivers sustained revenue for service providers.

This article highlights existing problems in the content ecosystem of short-video platforms, offering insights for platform operation management and risk mitigation.

1. Core problems in the current content ecosystem: A growing number of industry players are airing their private romantic and family disputes on platforms, harvesting traffic through public feuds and sensationalism, and turning platforms into arenas for public trial. This not only wastes user attention but also drags down the overall quality of platform content, and hard-to-verify sensationalism also easily sparks user dissatisfaction.

2. Negative impacts of this content: Long-term overexposure to sensational套路 will lead to user content fatigue, erode user trust in platform content, and damage the platform’s public reputation. This calls for timely regulatory intervention from platforms.

3. Recommended directions for operational optimization: Platforms should strengthen content regulation and penalize accounts that engage in malicious sensationalism and scripted drama for traffic—for example, Huang Yiming, who repeatedly violated rules with inappropriate sensationalism, was ultimately banned. Platforms should also increase support for high-quality positive content, guide influencers to operate in compliance with content rules, improve the overall content direction, and deliver a better content experience for users.

This article presents new trends and emerging problems in China’s current short-video influencer industry, offering high reference value for industrial research.

1. New industry trends: A new traffic and monetization business model has emerged in the influencer industry: practitioners attract traffic by sensationalizing private romantic disputes and public feuds with ex-partners, leverage the public’s curiosity to gain followers rapidly, and ultimately monetize through livestream gifts and e-commerce sales. This model features low barriers to entry and rapid account growth, making it a common shortcut for ordinary people to enter the influencer industry.

2. New industry problems: This sensational model is often unverifiable in terms of truthfulness. It erodes public trust, disrupts the normal order of the influencer industry, and increases the difficulty of platform regulation. Some practitioners even engage in bottomless sensationalism for traffic, including exploiting underage children, which violates public order and good morals.

3. Insights for industry development: For the future regulated development of the influencer industry, the industry needs to introduce relevant self-discipline rules. Platforms should improve regulatory mechanisms to crack down on malicious sensationalism, and guide influencers to create positive, high-quality content. Meanwhile, the public also needs guidance to approach these events rationally, avoid being exploited by traffic sensationalism, and support the long-term healthy development of the industry.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

人怕出名猪怕壮。

出品 | 电商头条 作者 |赵云合

每一次流量造神,都可能伴随一次“黑料”的集中爆发。

曾经,有网友在互联网上调侃,称自己当不了网红,更抓不住泼天的流量。因为还没等到爆火,已经被自己的黑料“压死”了。

可能,这就是所谓的人红是非多。人一旦站上流量高点,过去的每一个普通的举动,都有可能被放大成“黑料”。

近日爆火的抖音网红李要得,就陷入了情感纠纷。一位自称是李要得老婆的女性@周兴兴站出来,爆料两人过往的种种恩怨,引发多方猜测。面对这一变故,李要得能承受得住吗?

李要得被前女友炮轰:

不管孩子,和女性开房

爆火容易,长红很难。

最初,李要得因为穿标志性的红格纹衣服、说着地道的川渝方言、以及接地气的松弛风格,在抖音已有一定的知名度。

近日,他凭借一条搭乘出租车从重庆前往拉萨的视频迅速出圈,迎来流量高峰。该视频获得现象级传播,点赞量突破两千万、转发量破千万。

一夜全网爆火后,李要得涨粉超200万,当前抖音账号粉丝已逼近500万。开直播在线人数也是10万+,热度爆棚,礼物更是收到手软。与此同时,他已经开通了抖音橱窗,显示已售11万件。

此外,李要得还将获得官方50万元的宣传奖励。他公开表示,如果收到这50万,就给两位司机师傅一人一万,剩下的就全部捐了。他的这一做法,收获不少网红好感。

无疑,李要得成为了又一个一夜暴富的网红。只是,流量的背后是争议。一名自称是李要得老婆的女子@周兴兴,开始在抖音发布多个和李要得相关的视频,并塑造出独自抚养孩子的苦情单亲妈妈形象。

周兴兴称,她和李要得在一起9年,还有一个7岁的儿子,今年4月分手的。当初两人已经谈婚论嫁,她也已经怀孕。但最终因为彩礼问题没有领证,她自称是李家不想给彩礼。

后来,经双方同意生下孩子,她自己一个人照顾小孩,没有名分没有爱,还要哭着问李要得要3000元的补习班费,就连每月1000元的抚养费也是断断续续的,孩子根本没有体验过父爱。

此外,周兴兴还透露了两人分手的原因,她自称在李要得的手机上发现了他和女性开房的记录,还有在淘宝上买的杜蕾斯避孕套,甚至带女性去国外拍视频、过夜。

当然,这只是周兴兴单方面的表述,是真是假难以辨别,大多数网友质疑她是蹭流量的。当前,周兴兴抖音账号粉丝数已经高达14.4万。

对此,李要得在其抖音小号发布长文做出了回应。在李要得的表述中,他称周兴兴所发布的是不实言论,且周兴兴曾私下给他发短信想要“流量合作共赢”被拒绝,后来继续污蔑、诋毁他。

李要得表示,两人在2019年婚期前夕因彩礼谈崩、未能领证;孩子属于早产,李家承担生产及医疗全部费用,多年也一直按月支付抚养费。

后续,周兴兴以孩子反复额外索要钱财,阻碍他正常探视孩子;2023年,周兴兴称将与他人订婚,主动切断联系,拒绝他探望儿子。直到最近自己爆火,周兴兴才重新联系。

李要得称此前迟迟没有公开回应,本意是保护未成年孩子,不愿把家事搬到全网炒作、消费孩子博取流量,也不想陷入狗血拉锯战。

目前,双方说法不一,各执一词。多数网友倾向相信李要得,质疑女方周兴兴借孩子炒作、蹭取流量。值得留意的是,在李要得作出公开回应后,周兴兴删除了账号里一家三口的相关视频内容,却依旧持续发布信息进行爆料。

本质上,这类情感家事本就错综复杂、难以厘清是非。女方单方面发声,将家事搬到公开网络平台,把互联网当作审判场,试图裹挟网友充当裁判。但普通网友终究只是旁观者,难以知晓全貌、分辨真相。

这场裹挟着情绪与流量的纷争里,是非对错难以一言定论,究竟谁在借风波牟利,终究会被大众看清。

网红的感情纠纷反复上演

事实上,李要得与周兴兴的情感纠纷,并不是互联网上的个例。反复翻旧账、直播对峙前任、靠情感恩怨博取热度,早已成为屡见不鲜的网红乱象。

这类矛盾源头或许存在真实纠葛,但经过反复曝光和持续发酵后,很容易被大众质疑是刻意编排的剧本,本质是以情感闹剧博取流量、实现带货变现。

初代网红韦雪,便是靠“情史”炒作引流变现的典型例子。

她曾和山西富二代陈平结婚,生下一儿一女。离婚后,又和上海富二代秦奋相恋,并生下一子。网传分手后,韦雪不仅拿到了几千万分手费,更将9亿抚养费收入囊中。后来,更是和小她十几岁的男生恋爱,但已分手。

这些复杂的过往情感经历,长期成为她直播引流的核心素材。直播中,韦雪多次提及这些前尘往事,以此迎合大众猎奇心理、维持直播间热度。韦雪还经常和前夫陈平连麦,前男友秦奋也给她刷礼物。

2024年韦雪杀回互联网时,就凭借过往情感话题迅速收获大量流量,并实现一个月带货1个亿,变现能力强劲。目前,韦雪在抖音已经积累近千万的粉丝,带货变现能力稳定。

有网友表示,不否认韦雪最初借情感话题起号,但她如今已逐渐转型,不仅为家乡做宣传,带货上的专业度也在变强。

本质上,依靠情感狗血剧情炒作流量终究是高危模式,不具备长期可持续性。这种靠消费个人隐私、制造舆论噱头换来的热度极度脆弱。一旦人设崩塌或舆论失控,流量根基会迅速瓦解,甚至断送网红职业生涯,黄一鸣就是失败者中的一员。

最初,黄一鸣凭借未婚生女的特殊形象在网络上备受关注。而她女儿的身份更是引发多方猜测,后来她多次自曝女儿的亲生父亲是王思聪,但王思聪并未公开回应过。

期间,黄一鸣反复拿女儿的身份出来炒作,不仅晒出问王思聪要抚养费的聊天记录,还坦言:“我蹭我孩子父亲的流量,我赚点钱我咋了。”此外,她还表示想让女儿拍短剧《重生之我爷爷是首富》,话里话外暗示女儿的特殊身份,制造舆论看点。

黄一鸣还带着女儿到万达商场进行直播带货,一场直播销售额高达50万。直播中,更是反复强调女儿长得不像爸爸,更像爷爷,靠擦边话题为直播间输送流量。

种种炒作行为,让黄一鸣备受争议。前段时间,黄一鸣母女的账号就双双被抖音封禁。后续,黄一鸣给女儿注册新账号以复出,但再次被封禁。

感情纠纷与家庭琐事本就属于个人隐私,理应保留在私人空间妥善处理,不该被反复包装成狗血连续剧,变成长期收割流量、博取打赏与带货收益的剧本。

不可否认,部分网友抱着猎奇吃瓜、围观八卦、情绪站队的心态,持续评论转发、观看直播,短期内为当事网红带来巨大曝光热度,实现快速流量变现。

但同类互撕套路反复上演,很容易让观众产生审美疲劳,进而质疑整件事情都是刻意编造的剧本,丧失信任;同时网红的公众形象与人设也会持续受损,消耗路人缘与长期商业价值。

注:文/赵云合,文章来源:电商头条(公众号ID:ecxinwen),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:电商头条

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

抖音网红李要得是怎么爆火的?

李要得最初靠标志性红格纹穿搭、地道川渝方言、接地气的松弛风格在抖音积累了基础知名度,近期凭借搭乘出租车从重庆前往拉萨的视频出圈,该视频点赞量突破2000万、转发量破千万,爆火后涨粉超200万,账号粉丝已逼近500万。

李要得对前女友周兴兴的爆料有什么回应?

李要得称周兴兴发布的是不实言论,此前二人2019年因彩礼谈崩未领证,李家承担了孩子生产及全部医疗费用,多年一直按月支付抚养费,周兴兴曾以孩子为由额外索要钱财、阻碍他探视孩子,此次是借他爆火蹭流量。

网红靠情感纠纷炒作流量有哪些危害?

这类炒作短期能为网红带来巨大曝光、实现快速流量变现,但长期会让观众产生审美疲劳,质疑内容是刻意编造的剧本从而丧失信任,还会损害网红公众形象,消耗路人缘与长期商业价值,严重的会被平台封禁,断送职业生涯。

有哪些网红靠情感话题炒作获取流量的案例?

初代网红韦雪曾靠曝光过往情感经历吸引流量,2024年回归后靠相关话题一个月带货1亿,目前抖音粉丝近千万;网红黄一鸣多次借未婚生女话题炒作,靠相关擦边内容直播带货,最终母女账号均被抖音封禁。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0