广告
加载中

大二 CTO、60人团队和一家 Agent Native 公司

Alex 2026-07-15 13:36
Alex 2026/07/15 13:36

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文分享了Agent原生创业公司语核科技的创业经验和可复用的组织方法论,核心干货如下

1. 核心分工模式:将团队工作拆分为三层,人只负责第一层提出想法、判断和方向,信息梳理、执行等二三层工作交给AI Agent完成,人仅做验收抽查;开发上先搭好Loop Engineer,设好验收标准和测试用例,让Agent并行开发功能,日Token消耗达千元级别,这套方法可复用。

2. 招人与管理经验:招人核心看三点,对AI的热爱、Agent原生思维、创业精神,产研偏好年轻聪明人,营销偏好有经验心态开放的人才;管理上开放透明,允许员工反驳决策,信息充分公开,结果导向,激发成员能动性,这套管理方法也值得普通创业者参考。

本文介绍了Agent原生领域的创业实践,能给品牌商做AI转型、业务提效提供多方面参考,核心干货如下

1. 业务提效参考:语核当前主力收入是售前方向的数字员工产品,能帮助品牌替代人工完成售前方案撰写等工作,降低人力成本,提升售前响应效率,解决品牌售前团队产能不足的问题。

2. 产品研发参考:借助Agent分担二三层非核心工作,能释放品牌的研发人力,聚焦核心判断,降低研发迭代成本,加快新产品上线速度,适合品牌做AI相关产品的落地探索。

3. 合作与趋势参考:当前语核通过FDE能力补全产品落地最后一公里,能适配品牌不同场景的定制化需求,未来产品成熟后交付成本会逐步下降;长期来看品牌的岗位设置会被Agent重构,需要提前布局调整适应变化。

本文介绍了Agent赛道的创业现状,能给想切入AI领域的卖家提供方向参考和经验借鉴,核心干货如下

1. 市场机会提示:当前Agent原生赛道还处于早期发展阶段,市场空间非常大,已经浮现的市场需求远超过现有团队的服务能力,尤其是企业端的AI转型需求旺盛,大量企业尝试自研Agent达不到预期效果,最终会选择第三方服务,赛道机会多。

2. 可学习的经验:可以复用这套人+Agent的分工方法论,用AI分担执行类工作,降低人力成本,提升整体运营效率;招人上可以参考语核的标准,产研找年轻聪明、心态开放的新人做创新,业务端找有经验、接受新事物的老员工拓客。

3. 风险提示:当前行业最大的瓶颈是符合要求的AI人才缺口大,想要切入赛道需要提前储备人才,避免出现产能跟不上市场需求的问题。

本文分享的Agent原生协作方法论,能给工厂推进数字化转型、挖掘新商业机会提供参考,核心干货如下

1. 商业机会:一方面工厂可以借助Agent技术改造自身的生产、设计、业务流程,降本提效;另一方面面向制造领域开发垂直类Agent产品,切入企业AI服务赛道,当前这个赛道市场需求未被满足,很多企业转型做不好,有大量的市场空间可以挖掘。

2. 数字化转型启示:可以参考人+Agent的三层分工模式,把信息搜集梳理、重复执行类的工作交给Agent,工厂的技术和管理人员只负责核心方向判断、创新和结果验收,能释放大量人力聚焦核心业务,降低运营成本。

3. 组织调整启示:Agent会重构传统岗位的定位,工厂需要调整内部岗位设置,培养具有Agent思维的新型人才,适配新的工作模式,更好推进数字化落地。

本文介绍了Agent原生转型服务的最新落地实践,能给To B AI服务商提供行业趋势和解决方案参考,核心干货如下

1. 行业发展趋势:当前企业端AI转型的需求非常旺盛,Agent原生模式正在重构企业的组织分工和岗位设置,赛道整体市场空间大,目前还处于早期发展阶段,有大量的客户需求未被满足,拓客空间充足。

2. 客户核心痛点:很多有转型需求的企业尝试自研Agent,实际落地效果和预期差距很大,同时成熟的Agent产品还没做到开箱即用,产品和客户实际需求之间存在明显Gap,需要服务商解决落地最后一公里的问题。

3. 可参考的解决方案:可以借鉴语核的模式,将FDE作为能力而非岗位,签约前配合BD响应需求生成定制方案,签约后落地交付补全Gap,未来随着产品成熟逐步降低FDE占比,最终向标准化产品公司转型,同时内部采用人+Agent分工提升效率控制成本。

本文分享的Agent原生公司运作经验,能给AI领域平台商的生态布局和内部运营提供参考,核心干货如下

1. 市场需求与布局方向:当前Agent原生领域最大的瓶颈是人才缺口,符合要求的、具备Agent原生思维的人才供给不足,平台可以针对性推出人才对接、人才培养相关服务,满足创业公司的核心需求,同时Agent赛道创业公司增长潜力大,平台可以重点招商引入这类企业,丰富平台生态。

2. 内部运营管理参考:语核开放透明、结果导向的管理模式值得借鉴,管理上不用权力压人,鼓励不同意见,谁对听谁的,同时给核心成员充分的信息授权,激发成员的能动性,以结果作为核心考核指标,能有效提升组织效率,适合创新型平台参考。

3. 生态服务方向:平台可以将这套可复用的Agent协作方法论整理输出,开放给入驻的创业企业,提升平台对商家的价值,增强平台粘性。

本文提供了国内Agent原生创业公司的鲜活实践案例,对AI产业研究有较高参考价值,核心信息如下

1. 产业新动向:Agent原生模式已经从概念走向落地,国内已经诞生了规模60人的Agent原生公司,并且催生了一批全新岗位,比如Agent产品经理、Agent设计师、Harness Engineer,传统的产品经理、开发、设计岗位的定位正在被重构,人+Agent的分工模式成为新的组织形态。

2. 行业新问题:当前Agent行业发展最大的限制不是技术,而是人才缺口,具备AI热情、Agent原生思维和创业精神的复合型人才供给不足,同时当前Agent产品还未完全成熟,产品落地普遍存在产品和客户需求之间的Gap,需要交付端补全。

3. 可研究的商业模式:当前语核采用“标准化产品+定制化FDE交付”的模式,未来随着产品成熟会逐步向纯标准化产品公司演进,这套分工方法论可复制到多个不同领域,为行业提供了清晰可参考的创业路径。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article shares the entrepreneurial experience and replicable organizational methodology of Yuhe Technology, a native AI Agent startup, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Core division of labor: The team splits work into three tiers. Humans are only responsible for proposing ideas, making judgments and setting directions at the first tier, while information organization, execution and other work at the second and third tiers are delegated to AI Agents, with humans only conducting acceptance checks and spot inspections. For product development, the team first builds the Loop Engineer framework, defines acceptance criteria and test cases, then lets Agents develop functions in parallel, with daily token consumption reaching thousands of RMB. This methodology is fully replicable.

2. Hiring and management experience: Hiring focuses on three core qualities: passion for AI, native Agent thinking, and an entrepreneurial mindset. For product and R&D roles, the team prioritizes young, talented candidates; for marketing roles, it prefers experienced candidates with open minds. Management adopts an open and transparent approach that allows employees to challenge decisions, shares information broadly, and focuses on results to motivate team members. This management approach is also a valuable reference for general entrepreneurs.

This article introduces entrepreneurial practices in the native Agent space, offering multiple references for brands pursuing AI transformation and operational efficiency improvement, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Reference for business efficiency improvement: Yuhe Technology's main revenue driver today is its pre-sales digital employee product, which helps brands replace manual work such as pre-sales proposal drafting, cuts labor costs, improves pre-sales response speed, and solves the problem of insufficient pre-sales team capacity.

2. Reference for product R&D: By having Agents take over non-core work at the second and third tiers, brands can free up R&D manpower to focus on core judgment, reduce R&D iteration costs, and speed up new product launches — an approach well-suited for brands exploring AI-related product implementation.

3. Reference for collaboration and industry trends: Yuhe currently uses its FDE (Field Development Engineering) capability to complete the last mile of product implementation, adapting to the customized needs of brands across different scenarios. Delivery costs will gradually decrease as products mature. In the long run, Agent technology will restructure brand job roles, requiring early planning and adjustment to adapt to changes.

This article outlines the current status of entrepreneurship in the Agent track, providing directional guidance and experience for sellers looking to enter the AI space, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Market opportunity insights: The native Agent track is still in an early stage of development with enormous market potential. Existing market demand far outstrips the service capacity of current industry players. In particular, enterprise demand for AI transformation is booming; many enterprises that attempt to build Agents in-house fail to meet expectations and will eventually turn to third-party services, creating abundant opportunities in the track.

2. Replicable experience: Sellers can adopt this human + Agent division of labor methodology, letting AI take over execution-focused work to reduce labor costs and improve overall operational efficiency. For hiring, sellers can reference Yuhe's criteria: hire young, talented open-minded new hires for product and R&D innovation, and retain experienced employees receptive to new ideas for business development.

3. Risk warning: The biggest bottleneck in the industry today is a significant shortage of qualified AI talent. Sellers planning to enter the track should reserve talent in advance to avoid capacity shortages that cannot keep up with market demand.

The native Agent collaboration methodology shared in this article provides reference for factories advancing digital transformation and exploring new business opportunities, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Business opportunities: On one hand, factories can leverage Agent technology to transform their production, design and business processes to cut costs and improve efficiency. On the other hand, factories can develop vertical Agent products for the manufacturing sector and enter the enterprise AI service track. This track currently has unmet demand, as many enterprises struggle to pull off successful transformation, leaving large room for market exploration.

2. Insights for digital transformation: Factories can adopt Yuhe's three-tier human + Agent division of labor model: delegate information collection, organization and repetitive execution work to Agents, while factory technicians and managers only focus on core direction setting, innovation and result acceptance. This frees up substantial manpower to focus on core business and reduces operational costs.

3. Insights for organizational adjustment: Agents will restructure the positioning of traditional job roles. Factories need to adjust internal job design, cultivate new talent with native Agent thinking, and adapt to new working models to advance digital implementation more effectively.

This article introduces the latest implementation practices of native Agent transformation services, providing references for industry trends and solutions for B2B AI service providers, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Industry development trends: Enterprise demand for AI transformation is currently booming. The native Agent model is reshaping organizational division of labor and job design across enterprises. The track offers enormous overall market size, remains in an early development stage, and has a large volume of unmet customer demand, creating abundant room for business expansion.

2. Core customer pain points: Many enterprises seeking transformation have attempted to build Agents in-house, but actual implementation results fall far short of expectations. Meanwhile, mature Agent products are not yet ready for out-of-the-box use, creating a clear gap between off-the-shelf products and actual customer needs that service providers must address to complete the last mile of implementation.

3. Reference solutions: Service providers can learn from Yuhe's model by positioning FDE as a capability rather than a standalone role: FDE teams work with business development to respond to customer needs and generate customized proposals before contracting, then fill the product-demand gap during post-contract delivery. As products mature, providers can gradually reduce the share of FDE work and eventually transition to a standardized product business model, while adopting the internal human + Agent division of labor to improve efficiency and control costs.

The operational experience of this native Agent startup shared in this article provides reference for ecosystem layout and internal operations for AI-focused platform operators, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Market demand and layout direction: The biggest bottleneck in the native Agent space today is a talent shortage, with insufficient supply of qualified talent with native Agent thinking. Platforms can launch targeted talent matching and training services to meet the core needs of startups. Meanwhile, Agent track startups have high growth potential, so platforms can prioritize recruiting these companies to enrich their ecosystem.

2. Reference for internal operation and management: Yuhe's open, transparent, results-oriented management model is well worth learning. The approach avoids top-down pressure, encourages divergent opinions, lets the best idea win, grants full information and authority to core members to stimulate initiative, and uses results as the core evaluation metric — all of which effectively improve organizational efficiency and serve as a strong reference for innovative platforms.

3. Ecosystem service direction: Platforms can organize and share this replicable Agent collaboration methodology with their incubated startups, increasing the value platforms provide to merchants and boosting platform stickiness.

This article provides a vivid practical case of a domestic native Agent startup, offering high reference value for AI industry research, with core information as follows:

1. New industry trends: The native Agent model has moved from concept to implementation. A 60-person native Agent startup has already emerged in China, giving rise to a set of entirely new job roles such as Agent product manager, Agent designer, and Harness Engineer. The positioning of traditional product, development and design roles is being restructured, and the human + Agent division of labor has emerged as a new organizational form.

2. New industry challenges: The biggest limiting factor for the Agent industry today is not technology, but talent shortage: there is insufficient supply of compound talent with passion for AI, native Agent thinking and an entrepreneurial mindset. At the same time, Agent products are not yet fully mature, and there is a widespread gap between product capabilities and customer demand that requires delivery-side teams to fill.

3. Researchable business model: Yuhe currently adopts a "standardized product + customized FDE delivery" model, and will gradually evolve into a pure standardized product company as its products mature. This division of labor methodology can be replicated across multiple fields, providing a clear, actionable entrepreneurial path for the industry.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

没有一家公司可以被完全复制,但方法论可以复用。

文 |Alex

Neuters

翟星吉曾给GitHub上好几个人发邮件,他想给自己找一个CTO。

他没有专业技术背景。大学学的是电气工程,后来在帆软做了五年SaaS产品经理,自学过机器学习,但很快发现这条路不适合自己。

他换了一个办法,在GitHub Trending榜单上找那些基于OpenAI API做热门项目的人,挨个发邮件、加好友。

池光耀回了。

他2003年出生,当时还在读大二。

现在,语核科技大约60人,池光耀负责技术。翟星吉说,他的开发方式和传统研发很不一样。

先搭好Loop Engineer,设好验收标准和测试用例,再把目标派发给Agent,让Agent并行跑几十个feature,最后由人做抽查和复测。

每天消耗的Token,按千元级别计算。

语核科技成立于2023年5 月。团队里,产研和营销大致对半,FDE十来个人,交付人员更少。

公司现在有两条业务线。

一条是数字员工,尤其是售前解决方案方向,这是目前的收入主力;

另一条是新一代Agent产品,目标是让每个人在组织里拥有一个可以自主进化的Agent军团。

翟星吉在帆软待过五年,也经历过一家SaaS公司从几十人长到近万人的过程。

他说,那段经历一直有一个很陡峭的成长斜率。因为还年轻,也没有在一个岗位上反复做很久,所以没有太早形成思维定式。

01

人只做第一层

翟星吉把公司里人的工作拆成三层。

第一层是提出Insights,包括想法、判断和方向。

第二层是思考,包括信息梳理、总结和搜集。

第三层是执行,比如写文档、做方案、发文章。

他认为,人的核心价值主要在第一层。后面两层可以更多交给Agent,人负责验收、质疑和判断结果好不好。

这套分工已经影响到岗位结构。

传统前后端开发和UI/UX设计,在语核已经被重新定义。古典产品经理,在公司里的权重很弱。

翟星吉说,传统产品经理的很多能力正在被分化,一部分交给Agent,一部分交给Agent产品经理和Agent设计师。

新的岗位开始出现,比如Agent产品经理、Agent设计师、Harness Engineer。

他提到,Agent设计师不再像过去那样画传统原型,也不一定要围着Figma工作。很多时候,是直接和Agent对话,推动产品设计和体验生成。

翟星吉说,岗位本身不是固定不变的。如果工作方式被Agent改写,对应的人也需要随之调整。

02

心态要开放

翟星吉在采访里几次提到“心态开放”。

我问他,如果员工觉得CEO的产品判断有问题,能不能说服他。

他回答得很快:“当然能,为什么不能?”

他说,公司底层文化里有一个很重要的点,就是大家要能接受自己有缺陷,也能接受别人指出来。问题摆出来,把逻辑讲清楚,谁对就按谁的来。

他引用了马斯克的一句话,大意是聪明人不在乎情绪,更在乎事情本身的对错。然后他补充说,语核不是靠权力让谁听谁的,而是一起把道理讲清楚。

信息在公司里也比较透明。

翟星吉认为,越有Ownership的人,越需要更多信息。信息给得越充分,他越有信心,能动性也越强。

管理上,语核更偏结果导向。招足够优秀的人,给方法论和指导,让他保持陡峭的成长斜率,最后交出业务结果。

翟星吉每天花时间最多的两件事,是人才和产品。

03

最缺的还是人

问到公司当前最大的瓶颈,翟星吉没有犹豫。

不是技术瓶颈,是人才瓶颈。

他说,技术解锁得越多,能吃掉的市场就越多。

现在他们看到的市场,已经远远超过团队现有能力。

产研资源一直紧张,把有限资源投到产研上,是杠杆最高的事情。

语核招人主要看三点。

第一,对AI和技术本身有没有关注和热爱。

第二,有没有Agent Native的思维。翟星吉会看候选人过去用了哪些AI产品,用到什么深度,用它们做过什么。

第三,有没有创业精神。

不同岗位的人才标准也不一样。

产研端更偏年轻人。他说,要找最年轻、最聪明的那批人,去做前沿创新。

营销端则更看重经验,通常是5 到10年经验,但心态要年轻、开放。

面试到最后一轮,翟星吉会亲自聊。他说,业务经验前面几轮会看,到他这里,主要看更内在的东西。

04

FDE是能力,不只是岗位

帮助企业做Agent Native转型,这是语核正在做的事。

FDE在语核不是一个普通交付岗位。

翟星吉更愿意把它定义成一种能力。它解决的是产品和用户需求之间的Gap。

当产品还没做到完全开箱即用时,FDE要在客户现场把最后一公里跑通。签约前,它要和BD一起响应客户需求,生成定制化解决方案;签约后,它要把方案真正落地。

从这个意义上说,FDE既不是传统售前,也不是普通客户成功。它比客户成功更深地介入业务流程,也比传统售前更靠近真实交付。

不过,翟星吉也认为,FDE的比例会随着产品成熟而下降。

产品研发越往前走,产品越接近开箱即用,FDE需要弥补的空间就会越小。

当被问到客户会不会自己做一个Agent时,他回答“也可以,没什么不行的”。

但他接着说,事实上有不少客户自己尝试过,知道差距很远,最后还是来找语核合作。

这也是语核现在所处的位置。

一边要做产品,一边要在客户场景里证明Agent真能跑起来。

翟星吉不认为语核是一家FDE公司。他说,语核最终一定是一家产品公司。

采访最后,我问他,语核这套组织方式能不能复制到其他公司。

他说,没有一家公司可以被完全复制。每家公司都有自己的文化、团队和偶然性。但一套方法论、一套打法,可以被应用到不同领域。

注:文/Alex,文章来源:牛透社(公众号ID:Neuters ),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:牛透社

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

语核科技是一家什么公司?

语核科技成立于2023年5月,是一家Agent Native公司,现有约60人团队,核心业务分为两大板块:一是作为当前收入主力的数字员工售前解决方案,二是面向未来的新一代可自主进化的Agent产品。

企业应用AI Agent可以优化哪些工作环节?

企业可将信息梳理、总结、搜集类的思考工作,以及写文档、做方案、发文章类的执行工作交给AI Agent完成,人力仅负责提出核心洞察、验收核验结果,能够显著提升运营效率。

Agent Native相关企业的招聘核心标准是什么?

核心考察三点:一是对AI及技术本身有关注和热爱,二是具备Agent Native思维,有深度使用AI产品的相关经验,三是拥有创业精神;产研端偏好年轻创新人才,营销端更看重5-10年的行业经验。

FDE的核心职能是什么,和传统岗位有什么区别?

FDE是Agent Native企业的核心能力而非普通交付岗位,主要负责填补产品与用户需求的缺口,签约前配合BD生成定制化解决方案,签约后落地交付,比传统售前更贴近交付,比客户成功更深入业务流程。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0