广告
加载中

依赖谷歌、TikTok 流量“中间商”米多多闯港股:三年累亏超4100万美元

希波 2026-07-08 06:52
希波 2026/07/08 06:52

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心是披露跨境流量中间商米多多赴港交所IPO的背景与经营现状,干货信息如下:

1.米多多基本情况:米多多是国内跨境营销服务商,2014年由阮卫星创办,核心模式是对接Google、TikTok等国际流量平台与国内出海商家,赚取广告返点与增值服务费,目前布局海外营销、海外电商运营、会展三大业务,2025年93.1%的收入来自海外营销业务。

2.经营现状:2023到2025三年累计亏损超4106万美元,负债权益比率持续超过100%,处于资不抵债状态,业务极度依赖头部海外平台,2025年Google收入占比64.1%,TikTok收入占比30.3%,合计占比超九成。

3.核心风险:米多多融资签订了严苛对赌协议,若2027年6月底前未完成上市,投资方有权要求按本金加年化8%利息回购股权,新开辟的海外电商业务尚在初期,仅占总收入3.1%,短期内难以扭转亏损,整个跨境出海营销行业目前普遍存在增收不增利的问题。

本文披露了跨境出海营销行业的现状与风险,对出海品牌商的营销布局有较高参考价值,干货内容如下:

1.出海营销合作参考:品牌商可以通过米多多这类一级代理商对接Google、TikTok等核心海外流量渠道,还能同步获得独立站搭建、多语种内容创作、短视频制作、投放运营培训、出海方案策划等配套服务,比品牌自主开户投放更有渠道优势。

2.营销成本变化提示:近年Google、TikTok等主流平台都在收紧对代理商的返点政策,Google返点率已经从2023年的2.4%降至2025年的1.0%,全行业代理商都在调整收费模式,从单一依赖返点转向加收绩效服务费,品牌商需要提前调整营销成本预算,适应收费模式变化。

3.合作策略参考:当前国内出海服务商超过千家,市场集中度极低,排名行业第五的米多多市占率仅0.5%,品牌商可以选择多家服务商合作,分散单一服务商依赖带来的投放风险,同时可以依托服务商的流量能力布局社媒独立站直销渠道,贴合海外消费者的购物习惯。

本文为跨境出海卖家梳理了流量营销端的行业变化、机会与风险,干货内容如下:

1.行业变化提示:近年Google持续收紧对华代理商的返利政策,TikTok等新兴流量平台的返点率也整体呈下行趋势,全行业代理商已经开始调整盈利模式,从单一赚取平台返点,转向收取绩效服务费加返点抵扣成本的双模式,卖家的广告投放成本结构会发生变化,需要提前关注服务商收费调整,做好成本管控。

2.可对接的服务机会:米多多这类综合服务商可以对接几乎所有核心海外流量渠道,还能提供从站搭建、内容制作到投放运营的一体化服务,对于没有自主投放能力和流量资源的中小出海卖家来说,是性价比不错的合作选择。

3.风险提示:当前跨境营销服务赛道竞争极度激烈,全行业普遍面临增收不增利的困境,多数服务商都存在资金紧张、经营不稳定的问题,卖家选择合作方时要重点考察对方的资金状况和抗风险能力,避免服务商经营出问题影响自身投放进度和店铺运营。

4.机会提示:当前社媒独立站直销仍是出海增长方向,服务商开辟自营电商业务也验证了这一方向的潜力,卖家可以依托服务商的流量资源拓展这一渠道。

本文为计划出海的国内工厂梳理了商业机会与转型启示,干货内容如下:

1.行业背景机会:当前国内出海主体全球化布局提速,跨境电商行业仍有较大增长空间,海外消费者已经普遍接受通过社媒、独立站直接购买中国货品,为工厂直连海外C端消费者提供了良好的市场基础。

2.可对接的合作机会:米多多这类跨境综合服务商已经开辟了海外电商运营业务,会直接向国内工厂采购货品,依托自身的流量投放能力,通过独立站、社媒渠道直销给海外消费者,工厂不需要自建流量团队和销售渠道就能出海,大幅降低了出海门槛。

3.数字化出海启示:当前跨境出海的核心流量资源掌握在海外平台手中,流量成本逐年上升,工厂出海选择和服务商合作代运营模式时,要优先筛选有多元流量资源、稳定资金状况的服务商,降低合作风险。

4.风险提示:当前跨境营销行业整体盈利压力较大,多数服务商资金状况偏紧张,工厂和服务商合作时要提前做好账款风险管控,避免出现坏账问题。

本文披露了跨境出海营销服务行业的现状、痛点与转型方向,对同赛道服务商参考价值较高,干货内容如下:

1.行业发展现状:当前国内出海营销服务行业玩家超过千家,市场竞争极度分散,按照2024年收入统计,行业第五名米多多的市场份额仅0.5%,全行业普遍面临增收不增利的困境,头部企业省广集团、易点天下也都出现利润下滑的情况,行业整体盈利压力较大。

2.行业核心痛点:当前行业主流的“流量中间商”模式,核心收益来自海外平台的广告返点,返点比例由平台根据投放规模、KPI考核设定,服务商完全没有定价自主权,近年Google、TikTok等主流平台都持续下调返点率,直接导致大量服务商陷入亏损,多数服务商存在单一头部平台依赖的问题,抗风险能力极弱。

3.转型方向参考:目前行业已经在探索转型路径,米多多的做法是一方面调整收费模式,增加自主可控的绩效服务费收入,另一方面开辟自营海外电商运营业务,打造第二增长曲线,降低对平台返点的依赖,这个转型方向可供同行业参考。

4.核心客户机会:中小出海商家普遍缺乏自主对接海外平台的渠道,也缺少运营配套能力,对一体化营销服务有明确需求,这是服务商的核心增长机会。

本文梳理了跨境营销服务行业对平台的需求与存在的问题,对平台运营、招商、风险规避都有参考价值,干货内容如下:

1.行业对平台的核心需求:跨境营销服务商的盈利直接取决于平台的返点政策,稳定的阶梯返点机制是服务商稳定经营的基础,服务商普遍希望平台维持政策稳定性,保障自身合理的盈利空间。

2.当前合作存在的问题:近年头部海外流量平台持续收紧对国内服务商的返点政策,直接导致全行业盈利压力陡增,大量服务商陷入亏损,行业稳定性下降,长期来看也会影响平台自身的广告投放规模增长,不利于生态发展。

3.招商运营启示:国内跨境产业服务平台,可以依托国内出海行业的增长红利,引入米多多这类有成熟流量运营能力的服务商入驻,完善平台的出海服务生态,满足出海商家的多元需求,同时要做好入驻服务商的资质审核,重点考察服务商的资金状况和抗风险能力,避免风险传导。

4.风险规避方向:平台需要引导生态内的服务商拓展多元流量渠道和多元业务,降低对单一平台的依赖,提升整个生态的抗风险能力,避免大量服务商经营出问题影响平台自身发展。

本文提供了跨境营销服务赛道的最新案例、产业动向与核心问题,对产业研究来说干货充足,内容如下:

1.产业最新动向:当前国内跨境电商出海持续增长,带动跨境营销服务行业发展,行业玩家纷纷开启资本化进程,米多多是近期赴港递表IPO的代表性企业,同时行业玩家普遍开始转型,从单一的广告代理业务向覆盖营销、运营、会展的跨境综合服务商转型,寻求新的增长空间。

2.产业核心新问题:当前行业存在两个突出问题,一是商业模式存在天然缺陷,整个行业高度依赖海外流量平台,盈利主动权完全掌握在海外平台手中,海外平台近年的返点政策收紧直接引发全行业增收不增利的困境;二是市场极度分散,行业集中度极低,头部玩家市占率不足1%,难以通过规模效应降低成本实现盈利,大量中小玩家长期处于亏损状态。

3.商业模式研究案例:米多多作为行业第五名的代表性企业,其传统流量中间商模式、转型双收费模式、开辟自营电商第二增长曲线的尝试,为研究跨境营销服务行业的商业模式演变提供了最新的一手案例。

4.风险研究提示:当前行业玩家为获得融资普遍签订上市对赌协议,若上市失败触发回购条款,会进一步加剧企业的经营风险,这是行业资本化过程中值得关注的新风险点。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article discloses the background and current operating status of Midodo, a cross-border digital traffic intermediary that has filed for an IPO on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Company overview: Founded in 2014 by Ruan Weixing, Midodo is a Chinese cross-border marketing service provider that connects international traffic platforms including Google and TikTok with Chinese cross-border sellers, generating revenue from advertising rebates and value-added service fees. It currently operates three business lines: overseas marketing, cross-border e-commerce operation, and exhibition services. In 2025, 93.1% of its total revenue came from its overseas marketing business.

2. Operating performance: Midodo recorded a cumulative net loss of over $41.06 million between 2023 and 2025. Its debt-to-equity ratio has consistently exceeded 100%, leaving it technically insolvent. Its business is extremely reliant on major overseas platforms: Google contributed 64.1% of 2025 revenue, while TikTok contributed 30.3%, bringing the combined share of the two platforms to over 90%.

3. Core risks: Midodo signed strict onshore IPO betting agreements with its investors, which require the company to repurchase equity at the original investment principal plus an 8% annualized interest if it fails to complete a public listing by the end of June 2027. Its newly launched cross-border e-commerce operation business is still in the early stage, accounting for only 3.1% of total revenue, and is unlikely to reverse its losses in the short term. The "top-line growth without bottom-line profit" problem is widespread across the entire cross-border marketing industry.

This article outlines the current status and risks of the cross-border outbound marketing industry, offering valuable insights for outbound brand marketing planning. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Reference for outbound marketing partnerships: Brands can access core overseas traffic channels including Google and TikTok through first-tier agencies like Midodo, and also get supporting services including independent website building, multilingual content creation, short video production, campaign operation training, and outbound strategy planning. This model offers stronger channel advantages than opening accounts and running campaigns independently.

2. Marketing cost change alert: Major platforms including Google and TikTok have tightened rebate policies for agencies in recent years. Google’s rebate rate for Midodo has dropped from 2.4% in 2023 to 1.0% in 2025. Agencies across the industry are shifting their revenue model from relying solely on platform rebates to adding performance-based service fees. Brands should adjust their marketing cost budgets in advance to adapt to this pricing change.

3. Reference for partnership strategy: There are over 1,000 cross-border service providers in China, and the market is extremely fragmented. Midodo, the fifth-largest player in the industry, holds only 0.5% market share. Brands can partner with multiple service providers to diversify the risk of over-reliance on a single provider. They can also leverage service providers’ traffic capabilities to build social media-connected independent direct-to-consumer channels, which align with overseas consumers’ shopping habits.

This article summarizes industry changes, opportunities and risks on the cross-border traffic marketing side for outbound sellers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry change alert: Google has continuously tightened rebate policies for Chinese agencies in recent years, and rebate rates on emerging platforms like TikTok are also trending downward. Agencies across the industry have shifted their profit model from relying solely on platform rebates to a dual model combining performance service fees and rebates to offset costs. This will change sellers’ ad spend cost structure, so sellers should monitor service providers’ pricing adjustments and implement proactive cost control.

2. Available service opportunities: Integrated service providers like Midodo have access to nearly all core overseas traffic channels, and offer end-to-end services from website building and content creation to campaign operation. This is a cost-effective partnership option for small and medium-sized outbound sellers that lack in-house campaign capabilities and traffic resources.

3. Risk alert: The cross-border marketing service track is extremely competitive, and the entire industry broadly faces the challenge of growing revenue without growing profits. Most service providers face capital constraints and operating instability. When selecting partners, sellers should prioritize reviewing their financial status and risk resilience to avoid disruptions to campaign schedules and store operations if the service provider encounters business problems.

4. Opportunity alert: Social media-connected independent direct sales remains a key growth direction for cross-border outbound businesses, and service providers’ launch of self-operated e-commerce business validates this direction’s potential. Sellers can leverage service providers’ traffic resources to expand into this channel.

This article sorts out business opportunities and transformation insights for Chinese factories planning to go overseas. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry background opportunities: The pace of globalization for Chinese outbound players is accelerating, and the cross-border e-commerce industry still has considerable room for growth. Overseas consumers have broadly accepted purchasing Chinese goods directly via social media and independent websites, creating a solid market foundation for factories to connect directly with overseas end consumers.

2. Available partnership opportunities: Integrated cross-border service providers like Midodo have launched cross-border e-commerce operation businesses that source goods directly from Chinese factories, then sell directly to overseas consumers via independent websites and social media channels leveraging their own traffic capabilities. This allows factories to go overseas without building in-house traffic teams or sales channels, drastically lowering the barrier to outbound expansion.

3. Insights for digital outbound expansion: Core cross-border outbound traffic resources are controlled by overseas platforms, and traffic costs are rising year over year. When selecting a service provider for an outsourced operation partnership, factories should prioritize players with diversified traffic resources and stable financial standing to reduce partnership risk.

4. Risk alert: The entire cross-border marketing industry faces broad profit pressure, and most service providers have tight capital positions. Factories should proactively manage account receivable risk when cooperating with service providers to avoid bad debt.

This article discloses the current status, pain points and transformation directions of the cross-border outbound marketing service industry, offering high reference value for players in the same track. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current industry status: There are over 1,000 players in China’s outbound marketing service industry, and the market is extremely fragmented. Based on 2024 revenue, Midodo, the fifth-largest player, holds only 0.5% market share. The entire industry broadly faces the challenge of growing revenue without growing profits: even leading listed players including BlueFocus and Eclick have reported profit declines, putting the whole industry under significant profit pressure.

2. Core industry pain points: The dominant "traffic intermediary" business model relies heavily on advertising rebates from overseas platforms. Rebate rates are set by platforms based on spend volume and KPI performance, leaving service providers with no pricing power. Major platforms including Google and TikTok have continuously cut rebate rates in recent years, pushing a large number of service providers into losses. Most players also rely heavily on a small number of leading platforms, leaving them with extremely weak risk resilience.

3. Reference for transformation directions: The industry is now exploring transformation paths. Midodo’s strategy is twofold: adjusting its pricing model to add performance-based service revenue that it can control independently, and launching a self-operated cross-border e-commerce operation business to build a second growth curve and reduce reliance on platform rebates. This transformation direction offers a useful reference for other industry players.

4. Core customer opportunities: Small and medium-sized outbound sellers generally lack direct access to overseas platforms and supporting operational capabilities, and have clear demand for integrated marketing services. This represents a core growth opportunity for service providers.

This article sorts out the cross-border marketing service industry’s demands for platforms and existing industry issues, offering reference for platform operation, merchant recruitment and risk mitigation. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core industry demands for platforms: Cross-border marketing service providers’ profitability directly depends on platform rebate policies. A stable tiered rebate mechanism is the foundation for stable service provider operations. Service providers broadly want platforms to maintain policy stability and protect their reasonable profit margins.

2. Current issues in platform partnerships: Leading overseas traffic platforms have continuously tightened rebate policies for Chinese service providers in recent years, which has sharply increased profit pressure across the industry, pushed a large number of service providers into losses, and reduced industry stability. In the long run, this will also hurt platforms’ own ad spend growth and is not conducive to healthy ecosystem development.

3. Insights for merchant recruitment and operation: Chinese cross-border industrial service platforms can leverage the growth dividend of the outbound industry to invite established players with mature traffic operation capabilities like Midodo to settle on their platforms, improve their outbound service ecosystem, and meet the diverse demands of outbound sellers. At the same time, they should conduct strict qualification checks on settled service providers, with a focus on reviewing financial status and risk resilience, to prevent risk contagion.

4. Risk mitigation directions: Platforms should guide service providers in their ecosystem to expand diversified traffic channels and business lines, reduce reliance on any single platform, improve the entire ecosystem’s risk resilience, and avoid negative impacts on the platform’s own development from widespread service provider failures.

This article provides the latest case study, industrial trends and core issues of the cross-border marketing service track, offering rich insights for industry research. Key content is as follows:

1. Latest industrial trends: The sustained growth of Chinese cross-border e-commerce outbound expansion has driven the development of the cross-border marketing service industry, and industry players are increasingly pursuing capitalization. Midodo is a representative player that recently filed for an IPO in Hong Kong. At the same time, industry players are broadly transforming from pure advertising agency businesses to integrated cross-border service providers covering marketing, operation and exhibitions to seek new growth space.

2. Core emerging industrial issues: Two prominent problems face the industry today. First, the business model has an inherent flaw: the entire industry is highly dependent on overseas traffic platforms, and profit control is entirely in the hands of these platforms. The recent tightening of platform rebate policies has directly led to the industry-wide problem of growing revenue without growing profits. Second, the market is extremely fragmented and concentrated, with the largest players holding less than 1% market share, making it impossible to reduce costs and achieve profitability via economies of scale. A large number of small and mid-sized players have remained unprofitable for years.

3. Business model case study: As the fifth-largest player in the industry, Midodo’s traditional traffic intermediary model, its shift to a dual pricing model, and its attempt to build a second growth curve via self-operated e-commerce provide the latest first-hand case study for research on the evolution of business models in the cross-border marketing service industry.

4. Risk research alert: Industry players commonly sign IPO betting agreements to secure financing. If a listing fails and the buyback clause is triggered, it will further exacerbate the company’s operating risk. This is a new risk worth attention during the industry’s capitalization process.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

近日,境外流量“中间商”米多多集团股份有限公司(以下简称“米多多”)在港交所递交了招股说明书,拟申报在港交所上市。

米多多集团是一家跨境营销服务商,左手对接Google、TikTok等国际媒体平台,右手服务国内出海商家,从中赚取广告返点与增值服务费,极度依赖Google、TikTok for Business。

然而,成立逾十年,公司至今未走出亏损泥潭,2023年至2025年累计亏损超4100万美元。

更紧迫的是,上市对赌协议高悬。按照规定,若2027年6月底前公司未完成合资格公开发售,投资方可按本金叠加年化8%利息要求回购所持股权。

接下来,米多多能否借港交所IPO化解对赌协议、扭转盈利困局,成为市场关注的焦点。

01 阮卫星“下海”创业,打造海外流量“中间商”

米多多诞生于跨境电商行业高速扩张阶段,依托行业发展红利逐步发展。

公司的创始人阮卫星今年已经67岁,1985年在解放军工程兵学院取得学士学位。毕业后,阮卫星曾经担任南京军区福州军事法院副庭长。

据悉,阮卫星还曾担任福建省家具及装饰品出口基地商会会长、福州市会展协会会长、福建省进出口商会会长等职务,在跨境贸易行业积累了丰富的经验。

伴随国内出海主体全球化布局提速,叠加跨境电商全链路服务体系持续完善,行业增长空间进一步打开。阮卫星也将目光转至跨境电商业务,开始“下海”创业。

米多多的创办历史可以追溯至2014年5月。彼时,阮卫星和邓海开始布局跨境电商赛道,成立了米多多的前身汇源信息。

2015年,公司与Google(谷歌)建立合作关系,并于同年成为其菁英合作伙伴。目前,阮卫星担任米多多董事会主席、邓海担任首席执行官。

目前,米多多搭建起三大跨境电商综合服务体系。

第一类是海外营销服务。米多多为跨境电商卖家承接Google、TikTok、Meta等平台的海外广告投放业务,同时提供独立站搭建、多语种文案创作、短视频制作等配套服务,并且为客户提供出海方案策划、运营培训与智能化投放支持。

据悉,海外营销服务的盈利主要来自广告平台返点及增值服务费,这也是米多多最大的收入来源,2025年为公司贡献了93.1%收入。

第二类是海外电商运营业务,直接向国内工厂与品牌采购货品,利用自身广告投放能力,在独立站、社媒渠道直销给海外个人消费者,包揽选品、采购、广告引流、履约售后全链条。

第三类为会展服务,主要联合主办中国跨境电商交易会,承办线下展会、产业带供需对接会及行业高峰论坛。

简单来说,米多多是一家承接境外流量平台和跨境电商的“中介”平台,本质是流量“搬运工”,业务依赖于海外媒体平台。

2023年至2025年(以下简称“报告期”),米多多来自Google的收入占比分别为88.7%、66.4%和64.1%。

此外,受益于TikTok业务高速增长,公司来自TikTok for Business的收入也一路高涨,2025年占总收入的比例增长至30.3%。

目前,我国活跃的出海服务提供商逾千家,市场竞争十分激烈。按2024年跨境电商营销服务收入统计,米多多位居中国五大跨境电商营销服务提供商第五名,但市场份额仅有0.5%。

02 三年累亏4106.3万美元,深陷盈利难困境

已经成立十多年的米多多,目前仍然处在亏损的泥潭中。

报告期内,米多多的收入分别为7085.1万美元、7113.2万美元和1.38亿美元;年内亏损额分别为1641.3万美元、16.3万美元和2448.7万美元,三年累计亏损4106.3万美元。

「创业最前线」注意到,米多多的亏损和运营模式有关。

作为Google、TikTok for Business等海外数字媒体平台广告代理商,米多多传统核心收益来源于平台投放返点。

具体而言,由于跨境商家无法直接以优惠渠道投放海外广告,因此需通过米多多这样的“中介平台”完成广告充值。商家将广告费交付米多多后,由米多多统一向各大媒体平台结算广告款项,平台会依据代理商整体投放规模设置阶梯激励,按季度或年度返还对应佣金回扣,也就是所谓的“返点”。

不过,米多多获得的返点比例并不高。报告期内,公司从合作的国际数字媒体平台获得的平均返点率分别为3.2%、3.2%和4.4%,一直不足5%。

平台返点比例并非由米多多自主决定,其高低主要取决于公司对应渠道广告总投放规模、客户结构质量,以及各海外媒体平台独立设定的阶梯考核KPI政策等多重外部因素。

值得一提的是,2022年开始,Google对华代理商返利政策持续收紧,返点金额从2023年的149.2万美元降至2025年的83.8万美元,返点率也从2.4%降至1.0%。

尽管米多多在TikTok for Business投放规模持续扩容,但该渠道返点率在报告期内分别为13.8%、8.1%、11.3%,整体呈下行态势。

此外,其他国际媒体平台返点率从9.1%下滑至5.0%,同样走低。

由于米多多十分依赖Google平台,面对其返点政策的变化,公司不得不调整自己的收入模式。

自2022年起,公司的收费模式转变为向客户收取绩效服务费和平台返点抵扣成本的双盈利模式。报告期内,米多多的绩效服务费收入分别为80万美元、120万美元和180万美元。

但盈利空间仍然有限,报告期内,公司的毛利率分别为4.1%、4.4%和8.6%,虽然呈现逐年增长趋势,但净亏损率分别为23.2%、0.2%和17.7%,仍未走出亏损。

为了摆脱亏损现状,2025年5月,米多多开始了海外电商运营业务,在TikTok等国际数字媒体平台上进行产品推广,计划在广告代理主业之外开辟第二增长曲线,进一步降低对平台返点的单一依赖,增厚绩效服务费等自主可控收入,改善长期盈利水平。

但这项新业务尚处于初期摸索阶段,2025年海外电商运营业务收入仅有420.9万美元,占比总收入的3.1%,贡献十分有限。

米多多试图借海外电商运营业务拓宽盈利渠道,可仅凭现阶段微薄的营收规模来改善盈利结构,难度不容小觑。

03 对赌协议高悬,负债权益比率超100%

深陷亏损的米多多,资金状况处于紧绷状态。

报告期内,公司的负债权益比率分别为107.2%、107.6%和114.4%,持续超过100%,处在“资不抵债”的状态。

与此同时,公司的流动比率分别为0.89、0.89和0.86,持续低于1,流动资产无法覆盖流动负债。

对此,米多多在招股书中表示,公司可能需要从外部来源获取足够的债务融资及股权融资,以补充内部流动资金。

招股书显示,2025年,米多多共获得两轮融资,投资者分别是东兴证券旗下的东兴资产、Beta Strategy和林家圆,通过这两次融资公司共获得7000万港元。

为获得融资,米多多也付出了较大的“代价”,融资协议均附带严苛上市对赌条款。据悉,若米多多在2027年6月底前未能成功上市,则上述投资者可行使赎回权,并按年化8%计算利息。

2026年,米多多的联合创始人、执行董事兼首席执行官邓海通过全资公司INMI Holding两次转让股权,套现2000万港元。

在这次股权转让之后,米多多的投资后估值达到了25亿港元。

米多多在招股书中表示,截至2026年4月30日,公司拥有约1320万美元的现金和现金等价物。

但由于公司持续亏损,叠加转型新业务短期难以快速提振业绩,上市进度一旦受阻,高额回购本息将进一步带来经营风险。

事实上,这并非米多多一家之过,多家同行企业均面临不同程度的业绩压力。

2025年,省广集团实现营业收入213.54亿元,同比增长3.37%;归母净利润8996.95万元,同比下滑10.86%。据悉,省广集团是国内出海营销龙头,覆盖Google、Meta、TikTok等全平台。

同期,主营海外数字广告投放与全球化整合营销的易点天下同样面临“增收不增利”之困。

放眼整个跨境出海营销赛道,行业龙头都遭遇增收不增利困境,市场份额仅0.5%、体量悬殊的米多多所面临的经营压力恐怕会更大。

接下来,米多多能否摆脱对单一海外平台的依赖、扭转连年亏损的经营困局,顺利在港交所上市化解对赌风险,「创业最前线」将持续保持关注。

注:文/希波,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:创业最前线

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

米多多是做什么的?

米多多是跨境营销服务商,核心业务包含海外营销服务、海外电商运营业务、会展服务三类,对接Google、TikTok等海外流量平台,为国内出海商家提供广告投放、出海方案策划等服务,2024年位列中国五大跨境电商营销服务商第五名。

米多多为什么连续多年亏损?

米多多核心收入来源于海外媒体平台广告投放返点,2023-2025年平均返点率不足5%,Google等平台对华代理商返利政策持续收紧,同时公司最高毛利率仅为8.6%,新业务尚处初期贡献有限,三年累计亏损超4100万美元。

跨境出海营销行业当前发展现状如何?

目前我国活跃的出海服务提供商超千家,市场竞争激烈,头部企业普遍面临增收不增利的困境,2025年行业龙头省广集团净利润同比下滑10.86%,易点天下同样面临盈利压力,中小服务商经营压力更大。

米多多赴港上市面临哪些主要风险?

米多多2023-2025年累计亏损超4100万美元,负债权益比率持续超100%处于资不抵债状态,流动资产无法覆盖流动负债,同时背负上市对赌协议,若2027年6月底前未完成上市,投资方有权要求按本金加年化8%利息回购股权。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0