广告
加载中

炒股炒成董事长:一个牛散和一座锂矿的八年江湖

孙锋 2026-07-07 19:20
孙锋 2026/07/07 19:20

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章核心讲述了产业投资人王新用八年时间,从投资江特电机的牛散变成公司董事长的全过程,核心干货和实操启示如下:

1. 核心事件梳理:王新2017年入场江特电机,买入后很快因行业周期下行被套,之后越跌越买摊薄成本到6元,最多浮亏80%,江特电机一度被ST,股价跌到1.25元濒临退市;2021年锂周期反转,江特股价最大涨幅超25倍,王新获得数亿浮盈;2023年锂价再跌,江特重回谷底,王新通过收购上层控股股东股权获得控制权,2025年当选董事长。

2. 投资实操启示:投资周期类行业需要耐心等待周期拐点,低价摊薄成本的操作可以放大周期上行的收益,但炒股和经营企业是两回事,最终收益能否兑现还要看经营能力,不能只赌周期。

本文给新能源领域品牌商展现了锂行业的周期规律和资本入局的路径,有诸多参考价值,核心干货如下:

1. 产业与消费趋势:锂矿行业周期性极强,受新能源汽车政策和销量影响非常明显,2018年补贴退坡锂价下行,2021年新能源汽车爆发拉动锂价暴涨,2023年后锂价再次下行,品牌需要提前搭建抗周期能力,把握周期节点布局。

2. 资源卡位的重要性:江特电机依托宜春本地锂矿资源早早布局锂电赛道,在周期上行期获得了超25倍的股价涨幅,说明提前卡位核心资源对新能源品牌的价值提升作用极强。

3. 资本运作参考:品牌在周期低谷可以引入产业资本优化股权结构,解决经营困境,而产业资本也可以通过间接收购控制权的方式低成本入局,给品牌和资本双向合作提供了新思路。

本文梳理了锂行业近八年的周期变化和资本运作路径,给锂电产业链相关卖家提供了机会、风险层面的干货参考,核心内容如下:

1. 周期层面的机会:锂行业跟随新能源汽车产业呈现明显的周期性波动,2025年行业处于周期谷底,正是布局下一轮上行周期的窗口期,提前布局锂资源相关业务可以享受后续的增长红利。

2. 可学习的资本操作经验:王新没有在二级市场高价抢筹,而是通过收购上市公司控股股东的上层股权,低成本获得控制权,这种操作模式适合想要介入上市公司的从业者参考,能大幅降低收购成本。

3. 明确的风险提示:锂行业周期波动极大,即便拿到了优质锂矿资产的控制权,也需要提升经营能力才能兑现收益,目前江特电机仍处于亏损状态,从业者要警惕周期下行带来的持续亏损风险,不能盲目抄底。

本文给锂电、传统制造类工厂梳理了转型新能源的经验和产业机会,核心干货如下:

1. 转型布局的经验:江特电机从传统农具厂、电机厂一步步转型,早早布局锂电和锂矿业务,抓住新能源风口实现了价值飞跃,说明传统制造工厂只要提前卡位符合政策和消费趋势的新赛道,依托原有基础转型就能获得巨大增长空间。

2. 周期低谷的商业机会:行业进入周期谷底时,也是企业股权价值最低、引入产业资本最好的时点,传统制造工厂在经营困难时,可以开放股权引入有实力的产业资本,获得资金和新的管理资源,帮企业走出困境。

3. 跨界风险提示:江特电机当年收购九龙汽车,因为业绩变脸产生近11亿元的商誉减值,直接导致公司巨亏差点退市,说明工厂跨界并购新领域的时候,一定要做好尽职调查,提前防控商誉减值等并购风险,不能盲目扩张。

本文梳理了锂电产业的发展现状和企业痛点,给锂电产业链相关服务商提供了行业趋势和业务机会层面的干货,核心内容如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:锂电产业周期性非常明显,每隔几年就会经历一次谷底和峰值,随着全球新能源汽车产业的持续发展,锂资源的长期需求仍然稳定增长,产业发展过程中存在大量的服务需求。

2. 行业客户的核心痛点:锂矿企业在周期低谷普遍面临资金短缺、业绩亏损、控制权不稳定的问题,很多企业甚至走到退市边缘,很难找到合适的接盘方和投资方,也缺乏专业的资本运作支持。

3. 对应的解决方案方向:服务商可以针对周期低谷的锂电企业,推出股权撮合、资本运作咨询服务,对接有布局需求的产业资本,帮助企业解决资金和控制权问题;同时还可以为新入主的资本提供运营管理咨询服务,帮助企业改善经营,走出周期低谷。

本文展现了A股市场控制权变更的新路径,给平台运营管理、风险规避带来不少启示,核心干货如下:

1. 资本运作的新动向:当前产业投资人获得上市公司控制权,已经出现了新的操作路径:不再直接在二级市场举牌抢筹,而是先在二级市场潜伏低价拿股,再在企业周期低谷的时候,收购上市公司控股股东的上层股权,低成本获得控制权,这种模式更隐蔽成本更低,需要平台方关注其合规性。

2. 风险规避方向:濒临退市的ST周期类企业,更容易发生控制权变更,平台需要加强对这类企业控制权变动过程的监管,要求企业做好信息披露,防范违规操作,保护中小投资者的利益。

3. 平台发展启示:符合新能源赛道方向、拥有核心资源的传统转型企业,具备很高的投资价值,平台可以针对性引入这类企业,丰富平台上市企业品类,同时做好周期类企业的风险提示,引导投资者理性投资。

本文提供了锂电产业和资本市场运作的新案例,给相关研究带来很多新的内容,核心干货如下:

1. 产业发展的典型路径:国内锂电产业发展中,很重要一个路径就是地方传统制造上市公司,依托本土矿产资源转型锂电,江特电机的发展就是非常典型的样本,近八年两次完整的周期波动,也给研究锂行业周期影响因素提供了完整案例,政策补贴、新能源汽车销量是周期波动的核心驱动因素。

2. 资本运作的新模式:本文展现了一种全新的上市公司控制权获取模式:产业投资人以二级市场为入口潜伏,待企业进入周期低谷后,通过收购上层控制权间接入主上市公司,成本远低于传统的举牌并购,模式也更隐蔽,是值得研究的资本运作新动向。

3. 新的研究问题:非产业出身的投资人入主周期类上市公司,能否通过改善经营平滑周期波动,提升企业长期价值,这个问题还待后续验证,为研究产业资本介入上市公司治理提供了全新的研究样本。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article details the eight-year journey of industrial investor Wang Xin, who evolved from a retail investor betting on Jiangte Electric to becoming the company's chairman, with the following key takeaways and practical insights:

1. Timeline of core events: Wang entered Jiangte Electric in 2017, and was soon trapped by a sector downturn. He averaged down as the price fell, bringing his cost basis to 6 yuan per share, at one point facing an 80% unrealized loss. Jiangte was eventually labeled ST (special treatment for at-risk listed companies) and its share price dropped to 1.25 yuan, on the brink of delisting. In 2021, the lithium cycle reversed, and Jiangte's share price surged more than 25-fold from its bottom, earning Wang hundreds of millions of yuan in unrealized gains. When lithium prices fell again in 2023 and Jiangte's valuation returned to a trough, Wang gained control by acquiring equity from Jiangte's top-tier controlling shareholder, and was elected chairman in 2025.

2. Practical investment lessons: Investing in cyclical sectors requires patience to wait for cycle inflection points. Averaging down at low prices amplifies gains during the upcycle, but trading stocks is fundamentally different from operating a business. Whether returns can be ultimately realized depends on operating capability, not just betting on the cycle.

This article outlines the cyclical dynamics of the lithium industry and the path for capital entry, offering valuable reference for new energy brands, with key insights as follows:

1. Industrial and consumer trends: The lithium mining sector is highly cyclical and extremely sensitive to new energy vehicle (NEV) policies and sales. Lithium prices fell after subsidy cuts in 2018, surged on the NEV boom in 2021, and turned down again after 2023. Brands need to build counter-cyclical resilience in advance and time布局 around cycle turning points.

2. The importance of resource positioning: Jiangte Electric positioned itself in the lithium-ion track early by leveraging local lithium resources in Yichun, and delivered over 25-fold share price growth during the upcycle. This demonstrates that early positioning in core resources can generate enormous value growth for new energy brands.

3. Reference for capital operations: Brands can introduce industrial capital to optimize ownership structure and resolve operating difficulties during cyclical troughs. Meanwhile, industrial capital can gain entry at low cost via indirect control acquisition, opening up a new path for mutually beneficial cooperation between brands and capital.

This article summarizes eight years of cyclical changes and capital operation paths in the lithium industry, offering key insights on opportunities and risks for sellers along the lithium battery supply chain, with core content as follows:

1. Cyclical opportunities: The lithium industry follows distinct cyclical fluctuations tied to the NEV sector. The industry is at a cyclical trough in 2025, making it a window to布局 for the next upcycle. Early布局 in lithium-related businesses will allow participants to capture future growth dividends.

2. Actionable capital operation lessons: Instead of buying up shares at high prices on the secondary market, Wang gained control at low cost by acquiring the upper-tier equity of the listed company's controlling shareholder. This model is a valuable reference for industry players looking to gain access to listed companies, as it significantly cuts acquisition costs.

3. Clear risk warning: The lithium industry sees extremely large cyclical swings. Even if you gain control of quality lithium assets, improving operating capability is required to realize returns. Jiangte Electric still remains unprofitable today, so industry participants should guard against the risk of sustained losses during downcycles and avoid blind bottom-fishing.

This article summarizes transition experience and industrial opportunities for lithium battery and traditional manufacturing factories, with key insights as follows:

1. Lessons for transition布局: Jiangte Electric gradually transitioned from a traditional agricultural tool and motor manufacturer, built out its lithium mining and lithium battery business early, and captured the new energy boom to achieve a leap in value. This shows that traditional manufacturing factories can unlock enormous growth potential by positioning early in new tracks aligned with policy and consumer trends, and leveraging existing foundational capabilities to drive transition.

2. Business opportunities in cyclical troughs: Cyclical troughs are the period when corporate equity valuations are lowest, making it the best time to introduce industrial capital. When facing operating difficulties, traditional manufacturers can open up equity to bring in capable industrial partners, gaining access to new capital and management resources to pull the enterprise out of trouble.

3. Cross-sector risk warning: Jiangte's acquisition of Jiulong Auto resulted in nearly 1.1 billion yuan in goodwill impairment after the acquisition underperformed, leading to a massive annual loss that nearly pushed the company into delisting. This demonstrates that factories must complete thorough due diligence and pre-emptively mitigate risks such as goodwill impairment when pursuing cross-sector M&A, and avoid blind expansion.

This article outlines the current development status and pain points of lithium battery enterprises, offering insights on industry trends and business opportunities for service providers along the lithium battery supply chain, with core content as follows:

1. Industry development trends: The lithium battery industry is distinctly cyclical, alternating between troughs and peaks every few years. As the global NEV industry continues to expand, long-term demand for lithium resources will grow steadily, creating sustained service demand across the industry development cycle.

2. Core pain points of industry clients: Lithium mining enterprises generally face capital shortages, operating losses, and unstable control during cyclical troughs. Many even approach delisting, and struggle to find suitable acquirers or investors, as well as lack access to professional capital operation support.

3. Corresponding solution directions: Service providers can develop equity matchmaking and capital operation advisory services tailored for lithium battery companies at cyclical troughs, connecting them with industrial capital seeking布局 opportunities to help resolve corporate capital and control issues. Service providers can also offer operational and management consulting for new controlling investors, to help improve operations and pull companies out of the cyclical trough.

This article highlights a new path to gaining control of A-share listed companies, offering insights for platform operation, management and risk mitigation, with core takeaways as follows:

1. New trends in capital operation: A new model has emerged for industrial investors to gain control of listed companies: instead of directly bidding for shares on the open secondary market, investors accumulate low-cost positions secretly in the secondary market first, then acquire upper-tier equity from the listed company's controlling shareholder at a cyclical trough to gain control at low cost. This model is more stealthy and lower-cost, so exchanges need to pay close attention to its compliance.

2. Risk mitigation priorities: Distressed ST cyclical companies on the brink of delisting are far more likely to experience control changes. Exchanges should strengthen oversight over control transfers at these companies, require complete information disclosure, prevent non-compliant operations, and protect the interests of retail investors.

3. Implications for platform development: Traditional manufacturing companies transitioning into the new energy track with core resources hold high investment value. Exchanges can strategically attract这类企业 to diversify their listed company pools, while issuing clear risk warnings for cyclical firms to guide rational retail investment.

This article presents a new case study of lithium industry development and capital market operations, offering new insights for relevant research, with core contributions as follows:

1. A typical path of industrial development: An important path for China's domestic lithium industry development involves local traditional manufacturing listed companies transitioning into lithium battery production leveraging local mineral resources. Jiangte Electric's development is a perfectly representative case. Its two full cyclical swings over the past eight years also provide a complete dataset for research on the factors driving lithium industry cycles, with policy subsidies and NEV sales identified as the core drivers of cyclical fluctuation.

2. A new model of capital operation: This article introduces an entirely new model for gaining control of listed companies: industrial investors enter by accumulating positions quietly on the secondary market, then indirectly take control of the listed company by acquiring upper-tier control rights when the enterprise enters a cyclical trough. This approach has far lower costs than traditional tender offer acquisitions and is more stealthy, making it a new capital market trend worthy of further research.

3. New research questions: Whether a non-industrial background investor can smooth cyclical fluctuations and improve long-term enterprise value after taking control of a cyclical listed company through operational improvements remains to be verified. This case provides a completely new research sample for studies on industrial capital involvement in listed company governance.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

主角已换,但江湖故事仍在继续。

来源丨陆海商界(ID:shangjiezz)

作者丨孙 锋

编辑 | 赵春雨

2025年11月3日,江西宜春。

江特电机新一届董事会落定,52岁的王新坐上董事长的位置。

八年前,他第一次出现在这家公司股东名单上时,还只是一个拿着证券账户、押注锂矿行情的外来投资者。八年后,他的名字已经写进公司实际控制人名单,办公桌也从交易室搬进了董事长办公室。

A股有许多“炒股炒成股东”的故事。

炒成董事长的,不多。

牛散

江特电机是一家很有江西气质的公司。

它的历史可以追溯到1958年的宜春农具厂,后来改做电机,成为宜春电机厂。2007年,公司登陆深交所,是宜春第一家民营上市公司,也是国内中小型电机行业较早的上市公司之一。

宜春地下有锂。

2009年,江特电机开始进军锂电新能源。电机、锂矿、碳酸锂,再加上后来收购的新能源汽车业务,一度被拼成一张完整的新能源产业版图。

2015年前后,江特电机更是豪掷约29亿元收购九龙汽车。那几年,只要沾上新能源汽车,故事就有人听,估值也有人信。

王新正是在这个时候盯上了它。

2017年,一个散户,一下“梭哈”了江特电机几百万股,每股成本仅15元。

这个牛散,就是王新。

被套

结果很不巧,或者说人算不如天算。王新一买就被套。

2018年,新能源汽车补贴退坡,九龙汽车业绩变脸,锂价也开始下行。江特电机当年巨亏16.6亿元。其中,九龙汽车商誉减值接近11亿元。2019年,公司又亏掉20.2亿元。

2018年一季度,他犹豫着减持了一些股份,结果一年后他不信邪,越跌越买。2019年三季度,他重新持股1338万股;到2020年一季度,增至3000万股;三季度又增至3563万股。

股价也很不给面子,一直跌一直跌。

2020年,江特电机戴上“*ST”的帽子,股价最低跌到1.25元,市值只剩约21亿元。那已经不是普通意义上的套牢,而是公司随时可能跌进面值退市深渊。

当时,江特电机也在四处寻找救兵。

它一度准备向赣锋锂业定向增发,让后者成为控股股东。双方连合作备忘录都签了,最后却因同业竞争等关键条款谈不拢,交易告吹。

别人来尽调,看完走了。

即便如此,王新还一直补仓,成本降低到6元左右,但也亏了80%。

起飞

命运在2021年突然翻面。

新能源汽车销量爆发,碳酸锂价格起飞,过去被嫌弃的锂云母矿,一夜之间成了资本市场的香饽饽。

江特电机从1.25元一路涨到32.56元,最大涨幅超过25倍。

2021年上半年,王新的持股已经达到4409.98万股。三季度末虽然减至4268万股,但对应市值仍达到9.99亿元。

从深套到浮盈数亿元,只用了一轮锂周期。

入主

但好运并没有永远留在牌桌上。

2022年江特电机赚了23.26亿元;到2023年,碳酸锂价格掉头,公司重新亏损。2024年又亏3.19亿元。

江特电机再次来到周期谷底。

这一次,王新不准备只做屏幕外的股东了。

2025年2月,他以7.49元至8.29元的价格再次买入166万股,直接持股增至5012万股。

几个月后,真正的大动作来了。

7月24日,王新控制的伍佰英里科技出资3.15亿元,从朱军、卢顺民手中收购江特实业50%股权。

江特实业控制江特电气,江特电气又持有江特电机14.12%的股份,是上市公司的控股股东。这是一条典型的控制链。

王新没有在二级市场上硬买到第一大股东,而是绕到控股股东的楼上,直接买下半层楼。

同一天,三份协议落笔:

一份股权转让协议,一份一致行动协议,一份表决权委托协议。

交易完成后,王新与老掌门朱军成为江特电机共同实际控制人。9月,王新又通过伍佰英里科技受让江特电气20名股东合计36.92%的股权,其间接持股比例进一步升至9.29%。

11月3日,王新当选董事长。

八年前,他买的是股票。

八年后,他买的是控制权。

故事在继续

公开履历显示,王新毕业于北京大学,早年在中国远洋运输集团总部、国家电网下属投资公司工作,后来从事创业和投资。他不是那种每天追涨停板的小散户,更像一个拿二级市场当入口的产业投资人。

真正的故事不是一个散户凭借信仰熬过熊市,最后被公司请去当董事长;而是一个产业投资人先在二级市场潜伏,经历减仓、回补、深套和暴赚,再趁公司第二次跌入周期谷底,从牌桌上的下注者变成了坐庄这家公司经营命运的人。

过去,江特电机亏钱,王新最多损失账户里的市值。

现在,江特电机亏钱,董事会要找他。

最新年报显示,江特电机2025年仍亏损约3.69亿元。

董事长这把椅子,暂时还不是奖杯,更像一张等待兑现的欠条。

王新究竟是抄到了江特电机最后一个大底,还是把自己从股东套成了责任人,还要看下一轮锂周期,也要看他有没有能力把一家周期公司真正经营好。

江湖故事写到这里,才刚刚换了主角。

注:文/孙锋,文章来源:商界杂志(公众号ID:shangjiezz),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:商界杂志

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

牛散王新的个人背景是什么?

王新毕业于北京大学,早年曾在中国远洋运输集团总部、国家电网下属投资公司任职,之后从事创业与投资业务,属于侧重产业布局的投资人,2017年起布局江特电机相关投资,2025年当选江特电机董事长。

江特电机是一家什么类型的企业?

江特电机是江西宜春的深交所上市企业,前身为1958年成立的宜春农具厂,是国内中小型电机行业较早的上市公司之一,2009年进军锂电新能源领域,业务覆盖电机、锂矿、碳酸锂、新能源汽车等板块。

王新是如何成为江特电机董事长的?

2017年王新以个人投资者身份买入江特电机股份,多年间多次增持补仓,2025年其控制的伍佰英里科技出资收购江特电机控股股东相关股权,成为共同实际控制人,同年11月正式当选董事长。

江特电机近年经营业绩怎么样?

2022年江特电机盈利23.26亿元,受锂价周期波动影响,2023年起陷入亏损,2024年亏损3.19亿元,2025年最新年报显示其仍亏损约3.69亿元,目前处于行业周期谷底。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0