广告
加载中

下一个十年胜出的 不会是算力公司、模型公司和应用工具公司 而是那些掌握了“?上下文

戴珂 2026-07-06 15:43
戴珂 2026/07/06 15:43

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心观点为下一个十年AI领域胜出的不会是算力公司、模型公司、AI应用工具公司,而是掌握上下文智能的公司,核心干货如下:

1.当前AI行业发展现状:Gartner预测到2030年LLM成本效率将比2022年高出100倍,万亿参数模型推理成本降低90%,靠token赚钱的空间极小;各类AI应用工具开发门槛越来越低,但始终难以规模化盈利;通用大模型跑分不断提升,但企业落地失败率极高,海外就有95%的AI试点项目失败,88%的概念验证从未进入生产环节,国内失败率更高。

2.核心逻辑与常见问题:AI项目绩效=模型智能×上下文,没有适配企业业务的上下文,再强的模型也无法产生商业价值。AI落地失败大多是上下文失败,而非推理失败,常见问题包括跨系统身份不贯通、业务语义不统一、机构知识更新不及时,这些问题升级模型也无法解决。

本文提出的AI落地逻辑对品牌布局AI、抢占AI时代竞争优势有重要参考价值,核心干货如下:

1.品牌布局AI的常见误区:当前很多品牌投入巨资引入最新大模型、升级算力,却忽略了企业内部数据碎片化、业务规则不统一的问题,最终AI项目大概率失败,海外成熟企业AI落地失败率都超过九成,国内品牌失败率会更高。

2.搭建上下文层对品牌的价值:上下文层可以解决品牌AI应用中的三类核心问题,分别是统一跨系统的用户身份、统一不同部门的业务语义定义、及时同步最新内部规则和知识,避免AI输出错误无用的结果,保障AI落地效果。

3.未来AI竞争趋势:AI时代品牌的持久竞争护城河不是大模型能力,而是品牌自身适配业务的上下文体系,提前搭建上下文层才能真正让AI为业务创造价值。

本文为布局AI赛道的卖家梳理了清晰的行业趋势,明确了风险与机会,核心干货如下:

1.风险提示:未来十年大模型推理成本会下降90%,靠算力、token赚钱的机会空间极小;单纯做AI应用工具很难实现规模化盈利;只做通用大模型的话,企业落地失败率极高,很难获得持续稳定的商业价值。

2.机会提示:随着大模型技术快速发展,大模型的推理能力已经被少数头部实验室规模化解决,当前最大的商业缺口是构建适配企业业务的上下文层,这是未来十年AI赛道最核心的增长机会。

3.可学习的成熟经验:已经实现盈利的企业Palantir,其成功的底层逻辑就是构建了成熟的上下文工程体系,卖家可以参考该模式,聚焦企业AI落地的上下文需求开发产品和服务,更容易获得成功。

本文关于AI落地的核心观点,对工厂推进数字化和AI转型有重要启示,核心干货如下:

1.工厂AI转型的常见误区:很多工厂转型AI时,盲目投入巨资引入最新大模型、升级算力设备,却忽略了内部生产、设计、客户数据的整合治理,最终AI项目难以落地产生价值,失败率远高于海外成熟企业。

2.对产品生产和设计的价值:搭建适配工厂业务的上下文层,可以整合工厂不同系统的碎片化数据,统一业务语义,同步最新的生产设计规则,解决数据不一致导致的AI输出错误问题,让AI真正适配工厂的生产设计需求。

3.商业竞争机会:文章明确提出下一个十年胜出的是掌握上下文智能的企业,工厂提前布局搭建自身的上下文体系,就能建立AI时代的差异化竞争护城河,获得长期竞争优势。

本文为AI服务商明确了行业发展趋势、核心客户痛点和未来发展方向,核心干货如下:

1.行业发展趋势:未来大模型的推理能力会被少数头部实验室解决,单纯做大模型研发、算力服务、AI工具开发的服务商,很难获得长期持续的盈利,帮助企业构建和维护上下文层,会成为未来AI服务市场最大的需求增长点。

2.核心客户痛点:当前企业AI落地的核心痛点都和上下文缺失有关,普遍遇到三类问题:跨系统客户身份不贯通、不同部门业务语义不统一、内部规则知识不能及时更新,这些问题和模型能力无关,升级大模型根本无法解决。

3.解决方案发展方向:服务商可以将业务核心转向上下文层服务,打造聚合数据整合、语义统一、权限管理、知识更新等能力的整套架构方案,解决企业AI落地难的痛点,就能抓住新的增长机遇。

本文梳理了企业AI落地的核心需求,为AI平台的运营布局和风险规避指明了方向,核心干货如下:

1.企业客户对AI平台的核心需求:当前多数企业引入大模型后AI项目落地失败,核心需求不是更强的模型和算力,而是平台能够提供帮助整合内部数据、搭建统一上下文体系的工具和服务,解决AI落地的共性问题。

2.平台布局方向:AI平台可以调整自身的服务架构,将上下文层作为平台的核心基础设施,为入驻的AI服务商和企业客户提供统一的上下文能力支持,解决身份贯通、语义统一、知识更新等共性问题,提升平台整体的AI落地效果。

3.风险规避:平台不要盲目押注更大算力、更高跑分的通用大模型,要意识到单纯模型能力无法满足企业AI落地的需求,提前布局上下文层建设可以规避方向错误,抓住下一个十年的增长机会。

本文提出了AI产业发展的全新判断,对研究AI产业新动向、新商业模式有重要参考价值,核心干货如下:

1.产业发展新动向:过去AI产业的竞争核心围绕模型推理能力展开,随着大模型技术以惊人速度迭代,推理能力已经逐步被少数头部实验室规模化解决,产业竞争的核心正在从模型推理能力转向上下文智能的构建能力,竞争逻辑已经彻底转变。

2.行业新问题:当前行业普遍忽略上下文层建设,上下文缺失会导致失败叠加,十步工作流每一步85%成功率,整体成功率仅20%,AI的幻觉本质就是上下文缺失后模型的脑补,这是当前AI产业需要解决的核心新问题。

3.商业模式研究启示:未来AI产业胜出的商业模式不是算力租赁、通用模型研发、通用AI工具开发,而是围绕企业上下文层构建维护的相关服务,该模式已经被Palantir验证可行性,AI大佬Yann LeCun也以十亿美元押注该方向,是值得深入研究的新方向。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article argues that over the next decade, the winners in the AI industry will not be computing power providers, model developers or AI application tooling companies, but rather companies that master "contextual intelligence". Its key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current state of the AI industry: Gartner projects that by 2030, the cost-efficiency of large language models (LLMs) will increase 100x from 2022 levels, and inference costs for trillion-parameter models will drop by 90%, leaving very little margin for profit from token usage. Barriers to developing all types of AI tools have fallen steadily, but few players have managed to achieve scalable profitability. While general-purpose large models continue to post better benchmark scores, enterprise adoption has an extremely high failure rate: 95% of AI pilot projects and 88% of proof-of-concepts never reach production in overseas markets, with even higher failure rates in China.

2. Core logic and common pain points: AI project performance equals model capability multiplied by contextual intelligence. Even the most powerful model cannot generate business value without context tailored to a company's specific operations. Most AI adoption failures are rooted in context gaps, not flawed inference. Common problems include disconnected identities across systems, inconsistent business semantics, and outdated institutional knowledge—issues that cannot be fixed simply by upgrading models.

The AI adoption framework laid out in this article offers valuable insights for brands looking to build AI capabilities and secure competitive advantages in the AI era. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Common pitfalls for brands adopting AI: Many brands currently invest heavily in cutting-edge large models and expanded computing power, but overlook fragmented internal data and inconsistent business rules across their organization. As a result, the vast majority of these AI projects end in failure. Even failure rates exceed 90% for mature overseas companies, and domestic Chinese brands face even higher odds of failure.

2. Value of building a contextual layer for brands: A contextual layer solves three core problems that derail AI applications for brands: unifying user identities across systems, standardizing business semantic definitions across departments, and syncing the latest internal rules and organizational knowledge in real time. This prevents AI from generating incorrect or useless outputs and delivers reliable results for business use.

3. Future AI competitive dynamics: In the AI era, a brand's sustainable competitive moat will not be built on large model capabilities, but on its own business-aligned contextual system. Building out a contextual layer early is the only way to ensure AI generates tangible business value.

This article outlines clear industry trends, risks and opportunities for sellers positioning themselves in the AI track. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Risk outlook: Over the next decade, large model inference costs will fall by 90%, leaving very limited profit opportunity for businesses that rely on selling computing power or token access. Standalone AI application tools struggle to achieve scalable profitability. And companies that focus solely on general-purpose large models face extremely high enterprise adoption failure rates, making it hard to build sustained, stable business value.

2. Opportunity outlook: As large model technology advances rapidly, inference capability has already been solved at scale by a small number of leading research labs. The largest unmet business need today is building contextual layers tailored to enterprise operations, which will be the core growth opportunity in AI over the coming decade.

3. Proven successful framework to learn from: Profitable AI firm Palantir's success is rooted in its mature contextual engineering system. Sellers can follow this model by focusing on products and services that address enterprises' contextual needs for AI adoption, greatly increasing their odds of success.

The core argument on AI adoption in this article offers important insights for factories advancing digital and AI transformation. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Common pitfalls in factory AI transformation: Many factories blindly invest heavily in state-of-the-art large models and upgraded computing hardware when pursuing AI transformation, but neglect to integrate and govern fragmented data across production, design and customer-facing operations. As a result, most AI projects fail to deliver tangible value, with even higher failure rates than those seen in mature overseas enterprises.

2. Value for production and product design: Building a business-aligned contextual layer integrates fragmented data across a factory's disparate systems, standardizes business semantics, and syncs the latest production and design rules. This eliminates AI output errors caused by inconsistent data, ensuring AI is properly tailored to a factory's production and design requirements.

3. Competitive opportunity: The article makes clear that companies that master contextual intelligence will win over the next decade. By building out their own contextual systems early, factories can establish differentiated competitive moats in the AI era and secure long-term competitive advantages.

This article clarifies industry trends, core customer pain points and future direction for AI service providers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry growth trends: Large model inference capability will eventually be solved at scale by a small number of leading research labs. Service providers that only focus on large model R&D, computing power services or general AI tool development will struggle to generate sustained long-term profits. Helping enterprises build and maintain contextual layers will become the largest growing demand in the AI service market.

2. Core customer pain points: The biggest barrier to successful enterprise AI adoption today is rooted in lack of context, which manifests in three common problems: disconnected customer identities across systems, inconsistent business semantics across departments, and outdated internal rules and knowledge. These issues are entirely unrelated to model capability, and cannot be fixed by upgrading to larger models.

3. Strategic direction for solutions: Service providers can shift their core focus to contextual layer services, building end-to-end architectural solutions that integrate data unification, semantic standardization, permission management and real-time knowledge updating. By solving the core pain point of difficult enterprise AI adoption, providers can capture massive new growth opportunities.

This article maps out the core demand for enterprise AI adoption and clarifies direction for AI platform strategy, positioning and risk mitigation. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core enterprise demand from AI platforms: Most companies today see their AI projects fail even after adopting large models. Their core need is not more powerful models or more computing power, but rather tools and services from the platform to help integrate internal data and build a unified contextual system to solve common adoption barriers.

2. Platform positioning strategy: AI platforms can adjust their service architecture to position the contextual layer as the platform's core infrastructure, providing unified contextual capability support for on-platform AI service providers and enterprise customers alike. This solves common pain points including cross-system identity unification, semantic standardization and real-time knowledge updating, improving overall AI adoption success rates across the platform.

3. Risk mitigation: Platforms should not blindly bet on general-purpose large models with more computing power and better benchmark scores. It is critical to recognize that model capability alone cannot meet enterprise demand for successful AI adoption. Investing early in contextual layer development helps avoid strategic misalignment and captures growth opportunities over the next decade.

This article puts forward a novel assessment of AI industry development, offering valuable reference for research on new industry trends and emerging business models in AI. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New industry development dynamics: Competition in the AI industry has long centered on model inference capability. As large model technology iterates at an extraordinary pace, inference capability has gradually been solved at scale by a small number of leading research labs. Industry competition is now shifting from model inference capability to the ability to build contextual intelligence, representing a complete shift in competitive logic.

2. New unaddressed industry problems: The industry has widely neglected investment in contextual layers, and missing context creates cascading failures: a 10-step workflow with 85% success per step delivers an overall success rate of just 20%. The well-known problem of AI hallucination is essentially model "guessing" caused by missing context, making this the core new problem the AI industry must solve.

3. Implications for business model research: The winning AI business models of the future will not be cloud computing rental, general model R&D or general AI tool development. Instead, the largest opportunity lies in services for building and maintaining enterprise contextual layers. This model has already been proven viable by Palantir, and leading AI researcher Yann LeCun has already invested $1 billion in this space, making it a high-priority new direction for in-depth research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

首先说算力公司。

Gartner预测到2030年,LLM的成本效率将比2022年的模型高出100倍,对一个1万亿参数模型进行推理的成本将降低90%。想靠token致富,希望不大。

再说应用工具公司。

虽然各类工具不断推陈出新,开发一个Agent时间缩短到小时计。虽然各类“手搓”产品不断涌现,但终究难以规模化赚到钱。

最后说最有“希望”的模型公司。

每隔几个月,科技头条就会按一个可预测的剧本上演:一个新的AI模型发布了,它又登顶了排行榜。GPT-5.4 Pro解开了FrontierMath上连真人数学家都没搞定的数学问题。

AI模型表现实在是太好了,以至于我们不得不抬高更难的基准测试门槛。模型公司也理所当然地被寄予最大的期望。

然而在企业AI的实践中,AI却显得特别愚蠢。

MIT发现95%的AI试点项目失败了,IDC则报告称88%的AI概念验证(POC),从未进入生产环境。要知道,这些海外企业的数字化治理水平都是相当高的,换做国内企业,失败率可能还要高得多。

模型越来越聪明,前景看似无限,但惨烈的企业AI翻车现场,已经成为AI实验品的坟墓。

实际上,今天的LLM跑分已经不重要,因为无论高低,都无法交付真正的商业价值。所以,AI行业终极竞争优势,不会来自更高的跑分,而会来自AI时代最有价值的资产: 上下文(Context) 。

换言之,如果没有成熟的上下文体系,再强的模型也都啥也不是。

如今,整个LLM竞赛都围绕优化原始推理能力而建——模式识别、逻辑推理、代码生成、语言理解... ...,这就是我们今天所理解的AI智能,其实只是进入一个“充满无限可能的、永远的新手世界”。

整个世界都漂浮在五彩斑斓的天空中,缺少一个接地气的体系支撑——上下文层(Context Layer)。

所谓上下文层,就是架设在智能体与企业全域数据系统之间的核心基础设施。上下文层并不是一个单一的工具或软件,而是一整套企业AI落地的标准架构范式。它聚合数据、语义、规则、权限、溯源、记忆等多项核心能力,为企业所有AI智能体,搭建出统一、干净、可信、一致的业务认知界面。

一个AI项目的绩效,等于模型智能 X上下文。这意味着即使模型再强大,如果上下文为零,绩效就是零。

这可以解释为:即使是世界上最强大的模型,如果它不懂你的公司、你的业务,就无法做出可信的决策。

这也意味着,将高智能与错误的上下文配对,会导致负绩效。一个更聪明的模型在错误的定义、错误的治理规则或过时的机构数据上运行,会产生更精致、更有说服力、更危险的错误。它产生的幻觉不是更少,而是更令人信服。

就连AI大佬也得出这一结论。2026年,Yann LeCun离开Meta,筹集了10.3亿美元创立AMI Labs,旨在构建理解物理而非预测文本的"世界模型"。

他的十亿美元赌的就是: 没有上下文表征的AI,就是一条死胡同。

再说一个已经赚到钱的例子——palantir。

很多人将其成功归为FDE模式,其实其成功的底层逻辑是Ontology,背后对应的工程体系正是Context。而FDE交付模式,正说明上下文建设既重要、又复杂,必须采取FDE方式才行。

难道没有上下文层真的就不行吗?我们看几个场景。

身份贯通性失败

一个AI智能体被要求分析"客户旅程",但组织的数据是不同系统拼成的碎片化地图。同一个客户在CRM中是"张先生",在计费系统中是"张三",在支持日志中是"User996"。模型根本猜不到是同一个人,旅程走不多远就断了——缺少一个跨系统的统一客户认证。

语义失败

一个智能体被要求计算"季度营收"。它找到了数据,但它不知道对于销售团队来说,营收意味着预订额,而对于财务团队来说,营收意味着已确认的现金。于是它就自信地选了一个,结果产出了一份技术上很精致,但实际上毫无用处的报告——缺少将原始智能转化为组织事实所需的"本地词典"。

机构知识失效

一个合规智能体将一笔交易标记为违规,因为它严格遵循了书面手册。但它不知道的是,合规负责人六个月前发了一份备忘录,注明了对这类特定实体的永久豁免。那条知识存在一份被埋没的PDF中。AI产出的审查在技术上正确,但对业务来说仍然是错的——缺少信息的及时刷新。

这三个例子,失败都与模型无关。哪怕从GPT-4升级到GPT-5,或从Claude切换到Gemini,这些问题一个都解决不了。

这些是 上下文失败 ,而非推理失败。

更糟糕的是,这些失败会叠加。如果一个智能体在十步工作流的每一步都有85%的成功率,那整个链条成功的概率只有约20%。而所谓的幻觉,正是从上下文中缺失中,模型自己“脑补”出来的。

这对任何企业都意味着,在智能充裕的时代,仅靠模型已经无法参与竞争了,唯一持久的护城河,就是你组织的"世界模型",也就是上下文层。

所以,AI领域最重要的问题,不再是"我们如何构建更强大的模型?"而是"我们如何构建和维护组织上下文?"。

过去几年,最大的"难题"是造一台能强力推理的机器,模型是一切讨论的中心;次要问题才是考虑上下文建设。

如今,随着AI模型以惊人的速度成长,难题和易题已经互换了位置。构建推理引擎,正被少数几个实验室规模化地解决;而构建让推理真正有用的上下文,才是更大的商业机会。

所以,能在下一个十年胜出的公司,既不会是拥有最大算力集群或最贵模型的公司,也不是飘在半空的应用层和工具公司。

而是那些掌握了 上下文智能 的公司,它们才是撑起整个行业的核心力量。

注:文/戴珂,文章来源:tobesaas,本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:tobesaas

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

什么是AI上下文层?

AI上下文层是架设在智能体与企业全域数据系统之间的核心基础设施,不是单一工具或软件,是一整套企业AI落地的标准架构范式,聚合数据、语义、规则、权限、溯源、记忆等能力,为企业AI智能体搭建统一、干净、可信、一致的业务认知界面。

企业AI落地项目失败率高的主要原因是什么?

据统计95%的AI试点项目失败,88%的AI概念验证从未进入生产环境,核心原因多为上下文失败而非模型推理失败,常见情况包括跨系统数据身份不统一、不同部门语义定义不一致、机构知识未及时更新等,仅靠升级模型完全无法解决这类问题。

AI行业未来十年的核心竞争力是什么?

AI行业未来十年的核心竞争力是上下文智能,仅靠算力、先进模型、应用工具都无法形成持久护城河,只有掌握上下文智能,搭建适配企业业务的上下文层,才能让AI产生真正的商业价值,在行业竞争中胜出。

上下文对AI项目绩效有什么影响?

AI项目的绩效等于模型智能乘以上下文,即便模型能力再强,如果上下文为零,项目绩效就是零;如果搭配错误的上下文,高智能模型反而会产出更具迷惑性的危险错误,产生的幻觉更难被识别。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0