广告
加载中

餐饮店 越来越不专一了

红餐编辑部 2026-07-02 12:22
红餐编辑部 2026/07/02 12:22

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心讲当前餐饮圈已经打破了过去单一品类定位的规则,跨界抢生意成为新趋势,干货信息如下:

1. 行业现状:原来靠精准定位成为品类头部的品牌,现在都开始跨界,茶饮卖咖啡、焖锅卖汉堡、酸菜鱼品牌转做川菜,餐饮品类边界已经越来越模糊。

2. 变动原因:现在餐饮市场供大于求,实际门店数量远超合理承载量,单品类客流分流严重增长乏力,同时品牌为了摊薄房租水电等固定成本,拓展全时段经营,自然需要新增品类适配不同时段的消费需求。

3. 实用提醒:跨界不是跟风加产品,要先找未满足的需求,评估自身实力,尽量复用现有资源,中小经营者不要盲目跟风,没有竞争优势的情况下不如守住主业服务好老客。

当前餐饮行业品类边界消失,跨界融合成为新的行业趋势,对品牌经营的干货总结如下:

1. 消费趋势与用户变化:市场已经从供不应求转为供大于求,消费者选择变多,单品类难以稳定获客,用户需求呈现场景化、多元化特征,全时段经营的需求越来越突出。

2. 可借鉴的成功经验:头部品牌多切入标准化程度高、热度高的赛道,比如茶饮品牌布局咖啡,快餐布局能量碗,复用现有供应链、门店空间降本增效,太二转型鲜料川菜后同店实现双位数正增长,古茗跨界咖啡带动单店GMV同比增长20%,这些模式都具备参考性。

3. 风险提示:不能盲目跟风跨界,要先确认是否存在未满足的用户需求,评估自身竞争能力,尽量不要新增固定成本抬升盈亏平衡点,要结合自身资源扬长避短。

当前餐饮行业供需失衡,单品类增长乏力,跨界品类融合成为新的增长方向,给餐饮卖家的干货总结如下:

1. 可把握的增长机会:可以优先切入易于标准化、热度高的赛道如汉堡、咖啡、能量碗,也可以围绕全时段经营布局,填补早餐、下午茶、夜宵等时段的需求空白,摊薄房租人工等固定成本,有效提升单店营收。

2. 实操核心要点:跨界前要先判断是否存在未被满足的用户需求,评估自身和原有赛道玩家的竞争力,尽量复用现有门店、供应链、设备资源,遵循不增面积、不增人员、不增设备、不增成本的四不原则,控制经营风险。

3. 明确风险提示:中小餐饮卖家不要盲目跟风跨界,自身没有供应链成本优势和品牌势能的情况下,贸然跨界胜算极低,不如深耕主业,做好现有产品服务好老客。

当前餐饮行业跨界融合成为主流趋势,给餐饮上游工厂带来了新的需求、商业机会和转型启示,干货总结如下:

1. 产品生产与设计需求变化:越来越多餐饮品牌开展多品类布局,对柔性化、标准化、多品类通用的原料和半成品需求大幅提升,比如茶饮布局咖啡需要配套的咖啡相关供应,多品类全时段经营需要适配不同场景的标准化半成品,对通用型原料的需求远高于过去。

2. 新商业机会:工厂可以针对性开发多品类通用的标准化原料、半成品,满足餐饮品牌复用供应链、降本增效的需求,比如给卤味品牌开发适配主食的通用卤料半成品,给火锅店开发适配麻辣烫的通用食材,开辟新的增长空间。

3. 转型启示:工厂需要推进柔性生产能力建设,适配餐饮品牌多品类、小批量的灵活供应需求,同时可以对接更多不同品类的餐饮客户,降低自身经营风险。

当前餐饮行业正在发生品类融合的大变革,行业呈现新的发展趋势,也衍生出很多新需求,干货总结如下:

1. 行业发展新趋势:餐饮市场供给过剩,单品类餐饮普遍增长触顶,绝大多数品牌都有拓展新增量的需求,品类融合跨界会成为未来一段时间的主流行业方向,头部品牌已经完成初步布局,大量中小品牌也有潜在的跨界转型需求。

2. 客户核心痛点:多数品牌缺乏对跨界方向的判断能力,不知道如何选赛道,也不懂控制跨界成本,很容易盲目跟风新增投入,抬升盈亏平衡点放大经营风险,中小品牌这类痛点尤其突出。

3. 可布局的解决方案:服务商可以针对不同规模品牌推出定制化服务,比如为头部品牌做新赛道需求调研,为中小品牌做跨界可行性评估,输出成本控制方案,帮助品牌结合自身资源扬长避短,提升跨界成功率。

当前餐饮行业品类融合跨界成为新风向,给平台运营和招商带来了新的需求和调整方向,干货总结如下:

1. 品牌对平台的新需求:开展多品类多场景经营的品牌,需要平台调整品类标签规则、场景化流量分配机制,适配跨界品牌的经营需求,比如全时段经营的品牌需要不同时段的场景化流量扶持,多品类品牌需要更灵活的标签展示。

2. 平台可调整的运营招商做法:招商端可以加大对符合品类融合趋势品牌的引入力度,运营端可以推出对应场景化营销活动,给“茶饮+咖啡”“正餐+夜宵”这类多场景门店提供专属流量扶持,帮助品牌提升营收。

3. 风向规避:要警惕大量盲目跟风跨界的低质量门店入驻,这类门店经营风险高,闭店概率大,平台需要建立相应的准入评估机制,同时给入驻品牌输出跨界经营指导,提升门店存活率,降低平台运营风险。

本文梳理了中国餐饮行业最新的产业变动,总结了新的动向和商业模式,给产业研究提供了丰富的参考干货:

1. 产业最新动向:过去几十年餐饮行业奉行定位理论,坚持品牌即品类,现在头部品牌集体打破品类边界,从茶饮快餐到正餐卤味,都在跨界布局热门赛道、拓展全时段经营,品类边界已经逐步消融,这是产业供需关系变化带来的重大变革。

2. 变动背后的底层逻辑:产业变动的核心是供需关系反转,过去供不应求阶段定位理论有效,现在市场供给远超需求,单品类客流分流严重增长乏力,品牌需要通过跨界挖掘现有门店的消费潜力,摊薄固定成本。

3. 新商业模式总结:本文总结了头部品牌“烤红薯”式跨界模式,复用原有供应链、门店、客群资源低风险试水产品类,成功则撬动新增量,失败也不影响主业,同时总结了品类融合的核心原则,为产业研究提供了新的研究样本和理论支撑。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article highlights that China’s food and beverage (F&B) industry has abandoned the long-held rule of focusing on a single category positioning, and cross-category expansion has become the new norm. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current industry landscape: Leading brands that built their reputations on clear single-category positioning are now expanding into adjacent categories. Tea chains sell coffee, braised pot restaurants add burgers, and pickled fish brands pivot to full Sichuan cuisine, blurring traditional category boundaries.

2. Drivers of the shift: Today’s F&B market is oversaturated, with far more stores than the market can reasonably support. Single-category players face severe customer dilution and stagnant growth. In addition, brands are adding new categories to enable all-day operations and spread fixed costs such as rent and utilities, matching diverse demand across different day parts.

3. Practical guidance: Cross-category expansion is not just adding random new products. Operators should first identify unmet consumer demand, assess their own capabilities, and leverage existing resources wherever possible. Small and medium-sized operators should avoid jumping on the bandwagon blindly; when they lack a competitive edge, it is a better strategy to focus on their core business and serve existing customers well.

Category boundaries in China’s F&B industry are dissolving, and cross-category integration has emerged as a core industry trend. Key insights for F&B brands are as follows:

1. Shifts in consumer demand: The market has shifted from undersupply to oversupply, giving consumers far more choices. It is increasingly difficult for single-category brands to maintain a stable customer base, as consumer demand has become more scenario-driven and diversified. Demand for all-day operations has grown significantly.

2. Actionable takeaways from successful players: Most leading brands enter high-traffic, highly standardized categories. For example, tea chains are adding coffee, and fast casual brands are adding power bowls, allowing them to reuse existing supply chains and store space to cut costs and boost efficiency. After Tai Er repositioned as a fresh-ingredient Sichuan cuisine brand, it delivered double-digit same-store sales growth. When bubble tea chain Guming expanded into coffee, it lifted per-store GMV by 20% year-over-year. These models offer strong reference value.

3. Risk warnings: Brands should not expand cross-category blindly. They must first confirm the existence of unmet consumer demand, assess their own competitive strengths, and avoid adding unnecessary fixed costs that would raise their break-even point, leveraging existing resources to play to their strengths.

The F&B industry is facing a supply-demand imbalance, with single-category players facing stagnant growth. Cross-category integration has opened up a new path for growth. Key insights for F&B sellers are as follows:

1. Untapped growth opportunities: Sellers can prioritize entering highly standardized, popular categories such as burgers, coffee, and power bowls. They can also build out all-day operations to fill demand gaps for breakfast, afternoon tea, and late-night dining, spreading fixed costs such as rent and labor to effectively lift per-store revenue.

2. Core operational principles: Before expanding cross-category, sellers should first verify that unmet consumer demand exists, assess their competitiveness against incumbent players in the new category, and reuse existing store space, supply chains, and equipment. Sellers should follow the "four no's" rule: no extra space, no extra staff, no extra equipment, no extra costs, to control operational risk.

3. Key risk warnings: Small and medium-sized F&B sellers should not blindly follow the cross-category trend. Without supply chain cost advantages or brand momentum, the odds of success are very low. It is wiser to double down on core operations, refine existing products, and serve loyal customers well.

Cross-category integration has become a mainstream trend in China’s F&B industry, bringing new demand, business opportunities and transformation insights for upstream suppliers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Shifts in product and production demand: As more F&B brands pursue multi-category portfolios, demand has risen sharply for flexible, standardized, multi-category compatible raw materials and semi-finished products. For example, tea chains expanding into coffee need matching coffee supply, while multi-category all-day operators need standardized semi-finished products adapted for different consumption scenarios. Demand for general-purpose raw materials is far higher than in the past.

2. New business opportunities: Factories can develop standardized general-purpose raw materials and semi-finished products tailored to meet F&B brands’ needs to reuse existing supply chains and cut costs. Examples include general-purpose marinade semi-finished products for braised meat brands that can also be used for staple foods, and general-purpose ingredients for hot pot brands that can also be used for malatang (spicy hot pot). This opens up entirely new growth avenues for suppliers.

3. Transformation insights: Factories need to invest in building flexible production capabilities to meet F&B brands’ demand for multi-category, small-batch flexible supply. They can also onboard more F&B clients across different categories to reduce their own operational risk.

The F&B industry is undergoing a major shift toward category integration, bringing new industry trends and derivative demand. Key insights are as follows:

1. New industry trends: The F&B market is oversupplied, and most single-category players have hit growth ceilings. The vast majority of brands now need to unlock new growth, so cross-category integration will remain a mainstream industry trend for the foreseeable future. Leading brands have already completed initial layouts, and a large number of small and medium-sized brands also have latent demand for cross-category transformation.

2. Core pain points for clients: Most brands lack the capabilities to assess viable cross-category directions, select promising new tracks, and control expansion costs. Many end up blindly overinvesting, which raises their break-even point and amplifies operational risk. This pain point is particularly acute for small and medium-sized brands.

3. Potential service opportunities: Service providers can develop customized solutions for brands of different sizes: for example, conducting new-track demand research for leading brands, and delivering cross-category feasibility assessments and cost control plans for small and medium-sized brands. This helps brands leverage their existing resources and play to their strengths, improving their chances of successful cross-category expansion.

Cross-category integration has become a leading trend in China’s F&B industry, bringing new demand and adjustment opportunities for platform operations and merchant recruitment. Key insights are as follows:

1. New demand from brands on the platform: F&B brands operating across multiple categories and scenarios need platforms to adjust their category tagging rules and scenario-based traffic allocation mechanisms to fit cross-category operators’ needs. For example, all-day operators need scenario-based traffic support across different day parts, and multi-category brands need more flexible tagging and display.

2. Adjustments to platform recruitment and operations: On the recruitment side, platforms can increase onboarding of brands aligned with the category integration trend. On the operations side, they can launch targeted scenario-based marketing campaigns, and offer dedicated traffic support for multi-scenario stores such as "tea + coffee" or "full-service dining + late-night snacks" to help brands boost revenue.

3. Risk mitigation: Platforms need to guard against onboarding a flood of low-quality stores that blindly follow the cross-category trend. These stores carry high operational risk and are far more likely to close. Platforms should build targeted entry assessment mechanisms, and provide cross-category operational guidance for onboarded brands to improve store survival rates and reduce platform operational risk.

This article sorts out the latest industrial changes in China’s F&B industry, summarizes new trends and business models, and provides rich reference for industry research:

1. Latest industry developments: For decades, the F&B industry followed positioning theory, which held that "a brand equals a category". Today, leading brands across the board are breaking category boundaries: from tea chains and fast food to full-service dining and braised snacks, all are expanding cross-category into popular tracks and rolling out all-day operations. Category boundaries are gradually dissolving, representing a major transformation driven by shifting industry supply and demand dynamics.

2. Underlying logic of the shift: The core driver of this industry change is a reversal in supply and demand dynamics. Positioning theory worked effectively during the era of undersupply, but today market supply far outpaces demand. Single-category players face severe customer dilution and stagnant growth, so brands need to expand cross-category to unlock more consumption potential from their existing stores and spread fixed costs.

3. Summary of the new business model: This article outlines leading brands' "baked sweet potato" cross-category model: brands reuse existing supply chain, store, and customer resources to test new categories with low risk. Successful expansions unlock new growth, while failed tests have little impact on the core business. The article also summarizes core principles for category integration, providing new research samples and theoretical support for industrial research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

茶饮店卖咖啡、雪糕店卖汉堡,餐饮圈开始互相抢生意了。

本文由红餐网(ID:hongcan18)原创首发作者:卢子言;编辑:王秀清。

餐饮品类的边界正在消失。

曾几何时,“定位定江山”是餐饮圈的铁律,很多品牌通过精准卡位成为品类领袖,就像太二之于酸菜鱼,杨国福、张亮之于麻辣烫。

如今,这套玩法开始变了,大众很难用单一标签去定义一家店——做奶茶的卖咖啡、做炸鸡的推轻食、卖冰淇淋的做汉堡……品类之间不再是楚河汉界,而是开始争抢其他赛道的生意。

餐饮玩家们,不再满足于只做品类的“山大王”了。

品类边界模糊,

头部品牌集体“转行”

汉堡、轻食、咖啡……这些易于标准化、热度高的品类,正在被从四面八方冲来的跨界选手抢夺市场,一些老玩家甚至还没反应过来,蛋糕就被抢走不少。

以汉堡为例,前不久,主打三汁焖锅的黄记煌在北京一门店增设独立档口,推出全新子线“黄记煌锅气汉堡”,上线辣卤鸡腿排堡、厚切炸猪排堡、招牌炒肥牛堡等多款产品。同时,DQ、必胜客、M Stand、石头先生的烤炉等横跨冰淇淋、咖啡、烘焙等各品类的品牌,也集体卖起了汉堡。

值得一提的是,今年5月,必胜客旗下的必胜汉堡官宣全国门店突破100家,从去年年底开出双首店算起,前后还不到半年,门店数比入华7年的Shake Shack还要多上近一倍。

轻食赛道同样被各路头部品牌盯上,能量碗借此重新“火”了起来。

比如中式快餐品牌米村拌饭,今年年初上线“能量碗”系列,涵盖牛油果时蔬、金枪鱼牛油果、鸡腿肉牛油果、烤牛肉牛油果能量碗四款产品;广府老字号陶陶居推出四款“靓爆·能量碗”,将牛肉叉烧、豉油鸡胸肉、咕噜大虾球等经典粤菜与杂粮饭、时蔬相结合,成为“中式能量碗”。

此外,乐凯撒、达美乐、赛百味等本就属于西式快餐的品牌,也接连推出各类能量碗产品。

咖啡赛道也在上演相似的剧情。以茶百道为例,目前旗下覆盖咖啡业务的门店超过2700家,约占门店总数的三成,单看这个比例并不算高,可在今年年初,茶百道卖咖啡的门店才仅有200家左右,短短数月直接暴涨十几倍。

蜜雪冰城、古茗、甜啦啦、茉莉奶白等消费者耳熟能详的茶饮品牌,如今大多都在自家门店安上了咖啡机。

除了热门赛道外,部分正餐、卤味品牌也各有尝试。比如,早茶老字号点都德在上海开出早茶夜酒Bistro,白天卖广式点心,晚上变小酒馆卖鸡尾酒;去年,主打烤鱼的探鱼也在上海开了家热炒店,新上炒菜、烤串和小吃,做起了“大排档”生意;还有绝味跨界卖砂锅菜和新鲜零食,紫燕百味鸡开快餐餐厅......越来越多餐饮品牌不再只守着自己的一亩三分地了。

环境变了,

餐饮店不得不改变经营思路

层出不穷的跨界背后,是市场底层逻辑的反转。

过去几十年里,各行各业都信奉定位理论,这套诞生于上世纪70年代的营销方法论,核心可以简单概括为——占山为王,品牌即品类。这套打法放在以前确实有效,只要做到品类头部,消费者产生对应需求时便会主动到店,门店客流稳定充足。

举个例子,只要提到酸菜鱼,消费者首先联想到的往往是太二酸菜鱼(下称“太二”)。巅峰时期,太二的排队情况完全不亚于当下爆火的热门漂亮饭品牌,数据显示,2019年,其翻台率达4.9次/天;2024年,品牌门店数突破600家。不少业内人士评价道,“一个品牌撑起一家上市公司”。

但就在去年,太二告别“酸菜鱼”定位,转型做鲜料川菜。根据最新财报,截至今年3月,“新太二”门店已有273家,并计划2026年内完成内地门店的全面调改。

同样以酸菜鱼起家的鱼你在一起,去年9月开始在部分门店试水“酸菜鱼+烫捞”双品类并行的模式,除原有菜品外,增加海鲜、荤素类等各种自选食材;渝是乎酸菜鱼?川渝小炒也不断弱化酸菜鱼标签,部分门店直接摘除了“酸菜鱼”三个字,新增青花椒炒鸡、绝味耙鸡脚等多款川式菜品。

这些曾经专注于单一品类的玩家选择集体转向,原因主要出在供需关系的变化上。

过去定位理论之所以能行,是当时的餐饮市场处于供不应求阶段,消费需求旺盛,但选择有限,谁能让消费者第一时间想起来,生意就成了。

但现在,整个市场供大于求,消费者的选择越来越多,餐饮品牌只靠一个品类难以制胜了。红餐网专栏作者、豪虾传创始人蒋毅认为,按照中国的人口推算,中国餐饮门店的合理承载量大约在300万家,而目前的实际数字已经超过2倍。

供需失衡直接带来客源的持续分流,这在近几年多家上市餐企的财报中有所体现。以上文提到的太二为例,2025年直营门店的翻台率从2024年的3.5次/天降至3.1次/天,相比此前的4.9次/天下滑不少。受翻台率的影响,去年的同店日均销售额也同比下降11.5%。

在供给过剩的市场环境下,再继续依赖酸菜鱼这个大单品,显然难以扭转增长乏力的困局,从酸菜鱼延伸到口味相近的川菜,成了太二破局的新尝试。

目前来看,太二的跨界确实给整体经营带来了正向的趋势。2026年一季报显示,太二的同店数据正在加速修复,整体实现了双位数的正增长,客单价也从2025年的71元微涨至74元。光大证券研报亦指出,在太二新模型店的带动下,九毛九集团的利润率有望显著改善。

再看茶饮品类,经过几年的高速发展,茶饮赛道的整体增长趋势已经放缓。红餐大数据显示,2023年茶饮市场规模同比增长19.3%,2024年回落至8.2%,2025年预计进一步降至6.4%,3年间增速收窄超过10个百分点,增量空间肉眼可见地在缩水。

在这样的境况下,茶饮品牌之间的竞争不可谓不激烈,卷低价、卷联名、卷上新,这个赛道的方方面面都卷到了极致,所以头部品牌集体跨界其他品类来寻找增长空间。

比如咖啡,蜜雪冰城、古茗、茶百道、沪上阿姨等上市茶饮品牌,都在财报中提到了跨界咖啡的相关计划和成效。其中,古茗是在咖啡业务上布局较快的品牌之一,截至去年年底,该品牌已有超12000家门店配备咖啡机,占总门店数的近九成;上个月还宣布拟再投入4亿元发力咖啡品类,目标将咖啡营收占比从10%-15%提升至20%-25%。

得益于“果茶+咖啡”产品结构的带动,古茗2025年的业绩继续提升,单店日均出杯量从2024年的384杯涨至2025年的456杯,单店日均GMV同比增长20%至7800元。

很多单一品类经营的门店,还面临时段不均衡的问题,高峰低谷客流差异大,而房租、水电等固定成本不变。为了摊薄“房租”成本,不少餐饮品牌开始探索全时段经营。

全时段往往又很难用同一套产品打天下,不同时段走进门店的顾客,消费需求不同,产品也需要跟着场景走。

比如烤鱼品牌师烤延长部分门店的营业时间,新增烧烤、炸串、特调等菜品切入夜宵场景;凑凑在部分门店推出“凑凑煮茶”服务,融合茶饮、糕点和水果等,布局下午茶市场;奶茶店卖咖啡,咖啡店卖奶茶,咖啡和奶茶店都一起卖烘焙,也是为了提升早餐、下午茶等时段的收入。

跨品类布局,

不是加几个产品那么简单

尽管品类融合已经成为当下餐饮圈的新风向,但这不是增长的万能钥匙,不少老板看到什么火就跟着干什么,思维还停留在餐饮黄金时代。尤其是在当下供需不平衡的市场下,跨界方向的选择必须回归到基本的经营逻辑上。

在未来食餐饮战略咨询创始人余奕宏看来,餐饮品牌在跨界之前,要先厘清两个问题:一是是否存在未被满足的用户需求;二是竞争格局是否允许进入。

以烘焙赛道为例,据红餐大数据,截至今年4月,全国面包烘焙在营门店总数已超过22.6万家,仅广州正佳广场一个商场内就分布着近10家烘焙店,竞争十分激烈。供给密度如此之高,其他赛道的玩家若是跨界分食,只去争夺同样的场景、同一批顾客,最终只会陷入同质化的竞争中。

茶饮和咖啡品牌给出了一个新解法,对这类品牌来说,真正的机会不在于烘焙本身,而是提供了“茶饮/咖啡+烘焙”这个完整的搭配方案。在过去,消费者想要凑齐一份早餐就得分别去烘焙和饮品门店购买,新茶饮、咖啡店跨界烘焙,则恰好补齐了这个需求缺口。

“跨界不是简单的加法,要学会从经营产品到经营用户,真正解决消费者的问题。”余奕宏说道。

除了找准需求空白,餐饮品牌还得掂量自己的实力,看能否和赛道里的原有玩家正面较量。目前市面上的跨界动作,大多是门店增长触顶后被动做出的自救调整。但也有不少主业经营稳健的品牌主动试水跨界,出发点则略有不同。红餐网专栏作者、豪虾传创始人蒋毅用烤红薯效应概括这类品牌的经营思路。

这个说法最早源自小米,意思是手机、电视等主品类的经营已经形成了相对稳定的研发流程、供应链、渠道、客群等,炉子必须每日烧火来维持这些原有资源的运转,其中散发的余热,便可以顺势“烤”出牙刷、音箱、行李箱等“红薯”。

放到餐饮行业来看,对具备类似能力的品牌而言,这是一笔投入产出比很划算的账。复用已有的门店空间、后厨设备和供应链能力去孵化新品类,即便尝试不成功,也不会对主品牌造成太大的负担,而一旦跑通,就意味着在同一个门店里撬动了更长时段、更广客群的消费潜力。

但这样的“烤红薯”逻辑,只属于那些“炉子”足够大的玩家。对绝大多数中小品牌而言,贸然跟进跨界的胜算微乎其微,自身既不具备供应链的成本优势,也没有足够的品牌势能支撑溢价,一旦进入便是以卵击石。

由此可见,回到品牌自身来看,无论是扩品类还是扩时段,都不能脱离现有的门店资源和运营能力。

食萃总经理张程曾在2026餐饮产业节上分享,品类融合的关键在于明确“增什么”与“不增什么”。而哪些不能增,他总结了四点:不增门店面积,不增人员,不增设备,不增成本。

在当下利润普遍摊薄的环境里,每多一项固定投入,都意味着更高的盈亏平衡点,进而放大经营风险。

沿着这个逻辑往下走,对大多数的餐饮品牌而言,真正划算的跨界,同样是复用的资源,用几乎不变的固定成本撬动新增的营收。比如卤味店顺手卖主食,后厨本就有卤锅和操作台,多备些操作流程简单的面条米饭不会增加太多负担;又如火锅店推出麻辣烫,食材和汤底都是现成的。

反之,如果增加品类需要改造门店、增加人手,就得算好收益能否覆盖增加的成本,如果只是赔本赚吆喝,那还不如老老实实守住主业,把手头的产品做好,把现有的老顾客服务好。

归根结底,跨界不是跟风赌一把,知己知彼,扬长避短,才有可能走得更远。

注:文/红餐编辑部,文章来源:红餐网(公众号ID:hongcan18),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:红餐网

广告
微信
朋友圈

FAQ回顾

为什么现在很多餐饮品牌都跨界卖其他品类的产品?

当前国内餐饮门店实际数量超600万家,是300万家合理承载量的2倍,市场供过于求导致客源分流,单一品类增长乏力;叠加部分品类赛道增速放缓、门店时段客流不均但固定成本高企,品牌需通过跨界寻找新增长空间,摊薄经营成本。

餐饮品牌做跨界布局要注意哪些事项?

首先要确认是否存在未被满足的用户需求,评估目标赛道的竞争格局是否适合进入;其次要考量自身资源能力,优先复用现有门店空间、供应链、客群等资源,尽量不新增门店面积、人员、设备、固定成本,避免盲目跟风放大经营风险。

什么样的餐饮品牌适合做品类跨界?

品类跨界的“烤红薯逻辑”更适合主业经营稳健、已有稳定供应链、门店渠道、客群资源的头部餐饮品牌,可复用现有资源孵化新品类,投入产出比更高;中小品牌缺乏供应链成本优势和品牌势能,贸然跨界胜算较低,建议优先做好主业服务老客。

茶饮品牌跨界做咖啡能获得什么收益?

茶饮赛道近年增速持续收窄,2025年预计增速仅6.4%,跨界咖啡可拓展新的增长空间。以古茗为例,布局咖啡业务后,2025年单店日均出杯量从2024年的384杯升至456杯,单店日均GMV同比增长20%至7800元。

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0