广告
加载中

茶百道需重视“品控”

RBF内容组 2026-06-25 16:58
RBF内容组 2026/06/25 16:58

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章核心拆解了茶百道多次食品安全事故背后的深层原因,同时给普通消费者梳理了重点信息和维权实操干货。

1. 茶百道目前拥有超8600家门店,其中仅13家为直营店,总部核心收入来自向加盟商售卖原料和设备,一味追求扩张速度,忽略品控体系建设,违规成本极低,近年频繁曝出牛油果发黑、饮品混螺丝、餐具发霉等多起食安问题,品牌信任已经被严重透支。

2. 如果遇到茶百道食安问题,普通消费者可依据《食品安全法》主张价款十倍或损失三倍赔偿,不足一千元按一千元赔付;还可以在黑猫投诉、12315平台提交举证材料,通过社交平台客观曝光问题,集体监督可以倒逼品牌整改。

3. 消费者面对频发的食安问题,也可以选择用脚投票,减少复购,从源头规避自身权益受损的风险。

本文以茶百道食安事故频发为例,拆解了加盟制扩张模式存在的结构裂缝,给各类连锁品牌提供了品牌建设、模式发展的警示干货。

1. 加盟扩张模式如果仅把向加盟商售卖原料设备作为核心营收,将扩张速度放在优先级高于品控的位置,很容易出现管控失效的问题,最终会透支品牌信任。茶百道已经出现关店量暴涨四倍、食安投诉居高不下、消费者信任崩塌的问题,值得所有加盟制品牌警惕。

2. 品控管理层面,违规成本设置直接影响制度约束力,茶百道单次食安违规罚款仅数百元,远低于违规收益,最终导致制度形同虚设;仅靠AI监控这类技术工具无法解决根源问题,必须从顶层制度层面完成重构。

3. 当前消费者对食品安全的敏感度不断提升,品牌必须将品控放在战略首位,总部需要从“货品供应商”转向“品控标准制定与执行者”,才能实现长期稳定发展。

本文梳理了茶百道加盟体系的现状和痛点,给意向加盟茶百道以及已经入行的茶饮卖家,整理了风险提示和实操应对干货。

1. 茶百道对外宣传加盟建店预估17.5万元起,还在2025年推出首年0元加盟费、设备分期的政策,看似门槛很低,但实际单店总投入普遍在25万元以上;近年总部不断上调原材料价格、缩减补贴,加盟商成本压力陡增,2024年就有1144位加盟商终止合作,关店量达到2023年的四倍有余,行业风险持续升高。

2. 对加盟商来说,违规的长期代价远高于短期收益,一旦出现食安事故,加盟商将面临高额赔偿、门店关停、品牌解约的后果,足以让小店倾家荡产。

3. 在现有制度框架下,加盟商可主动向区域督导申请损耗补贴和经营扶持,严格执行标准化操作,建立门店内部自查机制,合规经营才能最大化规避风险。

本文拆解头部新茶饮品牌茶百道的发展现状,给茶饮供应链工厂、餐饮代工厂梳理了产品需求、商业机会和数字化转型的启示。

1. 产品生产和设计需求层面,当前新茶饮品牌上新节奏极快,茶百道就做到了月均近10款上新,对原料的新鲜度、稳定供应能力提出了很高要求,工厂可针对性优化自身生产、品控和供应体系,匹配品牌高频上新的需求,获得更多合作机会。

2. 商业机会层面,茶百道正在加速拓展海外市场,目前已经在韩国、法国、美国等8个国家开出38家海外门店,上游原料工厂可跟随品牌出海,拓展海外业务,打开新的增长空间。

3. 数字化转型启示:茶百道已经引入AI大模型搭建全链路食安管控体系,需要上游原料工厂对接智能管控系统,工厂推进数字化升级,适配品牌的管控需求,就能提升自身核心竞争力,获得更多合作优势。

本文梳理了加盟制连锁新茶饮行业的核心痛点,给服务于餐饮行业的各类服务商,指明了行业发展趋势、客户痛点和服务方向。

1. 当前加盟制新茶饮行业的核心痛点是:品牌扩张速度远快于品控体系建设速度,总部管控能力跟不上门店规模增长,加盟商成本压力大,食安问题频发,品牌方和门店两端都有强烈的痛点需求待解决。

2. 技术服务层面,目前头部品牌已经开始尝试引入AI大模型搭建全链路食安管控系统,实现库存、效期、制作数据的实时监控,给AI技术服务商、智慧餐饮解决方案服务商带来了大量市场需求。

3. 服务商可以针对性开发产品:针对品牌方,开发从总部管控到门店执行的一体化品控管理解决方案;针对加盟商,开发经营赋能、成本管控类配套服务,同时可探索帮助品牌搭建加盟约束和成本分摊机制的咨询服务,匹配行业需求。

茶百道食安事件暴露出连锁茶饮行业和各类平台合作中的诸多问题,给外卖平台、招商平台等平台商梳理了风向规避和运营优化的方向。

1. 对外卖平台来说,多数茶百道的食安问题都从外卖渠道流出,门店封装检查失守,问题产品通过外卖触达消费者,出问题后商家还经常将责任推诿给平台,外卖平台需要优化外卖渠道的品控监督规则,对频发食安问题的品牌门店出台约束措施,规避自身声誉受损风险。

2. 对招商平台来说,茶百道存在低门槛宣传、实际投入远高于宣传的信息不对称问题,平台需要完善加盟信息披露机制,公开品牌近年关店率、成本上涨等真实数据,帮助加盟商理性判断,规避虚假宣传带来的平台风险。

3. 平台可搭建品牌食安投诉快速处理通道,对接消费者维权需求,提升平台的用户信任度,同时也能倒逼品牌加强品控管理。

本文以茶百道牛油果发黑事件为切入点,拆解了头部加盟制新茶饮的商业模式痛点,给产业研究者提供了典型案例和研究方向。

1. 产业新问题:当前国内加盟制连锁餐饮普遍存在“扩张优先”的商业模式,总部核心营收来自向加盟商售卖原料设备,这种模式天然存在扩张速度与品控管控的张力,总部将经营成本转嫁给加盟商,权责不对等,最终引发系统性食安问题,这是加盟餐饮领域近年凸显的新问题。

2. 本文提供了丰富的一手研究数据:茶百道8621家门店仅13家直营,2024年关店量达到2023年的四倍,1144位加盟商终止合作,黑猫投诉平台食安投诉长期居高不下,这些真实数据为研究加盟制餐饮的发展风险提供了有效样本。

3. 研究启示:加盟制餐饮的可持续发展,要求总部完成战略转型,从货品供应商转向品控管理者,重构加盟约束和成本分摊机制,这为产业政策研究、商业模式创新研究提供了新的方向。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article unpacks the root causes behind Chabaidao's repeated food safety incidents, and summarizes key takeaways and actionable rights protection guidance for general consumers.

1. Chabaidao currently operates over 8,600 stores across China, of which only 13 are company-owned. Its core revenue comes from selling raw materials and equipment to franchisees. Blinded by a relentless push for expansion, the brand has neglected quality control system building, and faces extremely low penalties for violations. In recent years, it has been repeatedly involved in food safety scandals ranging from spoiled avocados and screws in drinks to moldy tableware, severely eroding consumer trust.

2. If consumers encounter food safety issues at Chabaidao, they can claim compensation equal to 10 times the product price or three times their actual loss under China's Food Safety Law, with a minimum compensation of 1,000 RMB if the calculated amount is lower. They can also submit evidence to the Black Cat Complaint platform and the 12315 hotline, and share objective exposures on social media; collective oversight can push the brand to implement reforms.

3. Facing frequent food safety incidents, consumers can also "vote with their feet" by reducing repeat purchases to avoid the risk of rights infringement from the source.

Using Chabaidao's repeated food safety scandals as a case study, this article unpacks structural flaws in the franchise expansion model, and provides actionable insights for brand building and model development for all chain brands.

1. When a franchise model centers revenue on selling raw materials and equipment to franchisees and prioritizes expansion speed over quality control, it easily leads to failed oversight and ultimately erodes brand trust. Chabaidao is already grappling with a fourfold surge in store closures, persistently high food safety complaint volumes, and collapsed consumer trust – problems that should serve as a warning for all franchise-based brands.

2. In quality control management, the cost of non-compliance directly determines the binding force of rules. Chabaidao only fines franchisees several hundred RMB for a single food safety violation, far less than the gains from cutting corners, leaving its rules effectively toothless. Technological fixes such as AI monitoring alone cannot solve the root problem; a full restructuring of top-level institutional design is required.

3. As consumers become increasingly sensitive to food safety, brands must place quality control at the center of their strategy. Headquarters need to transform from "product suppliers" to "setters and enforcers of quality control standards" to achieve long-term, stable growth.

This article outlines the current status and pain points of Chabaidao's franchise system, and organizes risk warnings and actionable guidance for prospective and existing Chabaidao franchisees in the bubble tea industry.

1. Chabaidao publicly advertises an estimated initial investment of 175,000 RMB to open a franchise store, and launched new incentives for 2025 including zero franchise fees in the first year and equipment installment plans, making entry barriers look very low. However, the actual total investment for a single store is generally above 250,000 RMB. In recent years, headquarters has continuously raised raw material prices and cut subsidies, sharply increasing cost pressure on franchisees: 1,144 franchisees terminated their contracts in 2024, and total store closures were more than four times the 2023 level, indicating rising industry risks.

2. For franchisees, the long-term costs of non-compliance far outweigh short-term gains. A single food safety incident can lead to high compensation claims, store closure, and termination of the franchise contract – outcomes that can ruin small business owners.

3. Under the current institutional framework, franchisees can proactively apply for loss subsidies and operational support from regional supervisors, strictly follow standardized operating procedures, and establish internal self-inspection mechanisms. Compliant operation is the most effective way to minimize risk.

This article analyzes the current development of leading new-style tea brand Chabaidao, and summarizes implications for product demand, business opportunities and digital transformation for bubble tea supply chain factories and food processing contractors.

1. In terms of product development and production demand, new-style tea brands now have an extremely fast product launch pace: Chabaidao launches nearly 10 new products per month on average, which sets high requirements for raw material freshness and stable supply. Factories can tailor their production, quality control and supply systems to meet brands' demand for frequent new product launches, to win more cooperation opportunities.

2. For business opportunities, Chabaidao is accelerating its overseas expansion, with 38 stores already open in 8 countries including South Korea, France, and the United States. Upstream raw material factories can follow these brands to enter overseas markets, expand their international business, and unlock new growth opportunities.

3. Implications for digital transformation: Chabaidao has adopted a large AI model to build an end-to-end food safety control system, which requires upstream raw material factories to integrate with its smart management system. Factories that advance digital upgrades to align with brands' control requirements will improve their core competitiveness and gain greater advantages in winning cooperation.

This article outlines the core pain points of the franchise-based new-style tea chain industry, and points out industry trends, client pain points and service directions for all catering industry service providers.

1. The core pain point of the current franchise-based new-style tea industry is that brand expansion has far outpaced the building of quality control systems: headquarters oversight capacity cannot keep up with store network growth, franchisees face mounting cost pressure, and food safety incidents are frequent, leaving both brand owners and stores with strong unmet demand for solutions.

2. On the technical service side, leading brands have already started testing large AI models to build end-to-end food safety control systems that enable real-time monitoring of inventory, expiration dates, and production data, creating massive market demand for AI technology providers and smart catering solution providers.

3. Service providers can develop tailored offerings: for brand owners, build integrated quality control management solutions covering everything from headquarters oversight to in-store execution; for franchisees, develop supporting services for operational empowerment and cost control. They can also explore consulting services to help brands build franchise restraint mechanisms and cost-sharing systems, to align with industry demand.

Chabaidao's food safety scandals have exposed multiple problems in cooperation between chain tea brands and various platform operators, and this article summarizes directions for risk prevention and operational optimization for food delivery platforms and franchise recruitment platforms.

1. For food delivery platforms: Most Chabaidao food safety problems are discovered through the delivery channel, as stores fail to conduct packaging checks before dispatching orders, allowing non-compliant products to reach consumers. When problems occur, merchants often shift blame to platforms. Food delivery platforms need to optimize quality control oversight rules for delivery channels, introduce restraint measures for brand stores with frequent food safety violations, and avoid reputational damage.

2. For franchise recruitment platforms: Chabaidao's case highlights information asymmetry, where the brand advertises low entry barriers but actual investment far exceeds disclosed figures. Platforms need to improve franchise information disclosure mechanisms, publish authentic data such as recent store closure rates and cost increases to help franchisees make rational decisions, and avoid platform risks stemming from misleading advertising.

3. Platforms can also build dedicated rapid response channels for food safety complaints from brands, to meet consumers' rights protection demand, boost user trust in the platform, and also push brands to strengthen quality control management.

Starting from Chabaidao's spoiled avocado food safety incident, this article unpacks the business model pain points of leading franchise-based new-style tea brands, and provides a typical case and research directions for industry researchers.

1. New industry issues: Currently, China's franchise-based chain catering industry widely follows an "expansion-first" business model, where headquarters' core revenue comes from selling raw materials and equipment to franchisees. This model inherently creates tension between expansion speed and quality control oversight; headquarters shifts operating costs to franchisees, creating unequal rights and responsibilities, and ultimately leading to systemic food safety problems, which is a newly prominent issue in the franchise catering sector in recent years.

2. This article provides rich first-hand research data: only 13 of Chabaidao's 8,621 stores are company-owned, 2024 store closures reached four times the 2023 level, 1,144 franchisees terminated cooperation, and food safety complaints on the Black Cat Complaint platform have remained persistently high. This authentic data provides a valid sample for researching development risks of franchise-based catering.

3. Research implications: The sustainable development of franchise-based catering requires headquarters to complete strategic transformation, shifting from product supplier to quality control manager, and restructuring franchise restraint and cost-sharing mechanisms. This provides new directions for industrial policy research and business model innovation research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

从牛油果发黑事件看茶百道的加盟制结构裂缝。

作者:史安 编辑:柴元锦

@零售商业财经 原创出品

6月21日前后,茶百道一款含牛油果的果蔬饮品在外卖端被消费者捞出大块未打碎的果肉,切面呈黑褐色。实拍图在小红书、抖音快速扩散,却又突然降温,直至消失,不得不说互联网是有记忆的。

品牌方的处理路径与此前高度一致:联系顾客、退款补偿、店内自查。但疑问已经抛出,牛油果氧化褐变和腐烂变质在视觉上容易被混同,可无论哪一种,它都不该以大块未打碎的形态抵达消费者手中。这恰恰佐证了本文要拆解的核心命题,当门店操作SOP、水果验收与外卖封装检查同时失守,每一次“个例”都不是偶然。

表面看是一次次偶发的门店翻车。从2021年反复曝出的异物投诉,到2025年的螺丝罚单,再到刚刚过去的6月21日牛油果果肉发黑事件。但把它们摊开,会发现同一套结构在反复产出同一种事故。

2024年,仅海淀区市场监管局公开通报中,茶百道关联门店已数次登上后厨不洁、有害生物滋生的名单(据海淀区市场监管局公开通报,2024年茶百道关联主体“北京睿钰”因有害生物滋生被警告)。2021年浙江省市场监管部门专项检查一次就发现36家问题门店,未发现此前曝光的过期原料换新标签问题,但基础卫生管理缺陷仍触目惊心。黑猫投诉平台上,关于茶百道的投诉长期居高不下,食品安全与服务类投诉占据显著多数。

一家拥有超过8600家门店、年营收接近54亿元的上市公司,为何在食品安全这条底线上频频失守?答案不在某一个门店、某一位员工身上,而要从总部、加盟商、消费者三个角色的互动中寻找。

总部

扩张的油门与管控的刹车

茶百道的商业模式决定了总部与食品安全之间的天然张力。

截至2025年底,境内8621家门店中,加盟店占了绝对多数,直营店仅有13家。总部的主要收入来自向加盟商销售货品及设备,这部分业务在2025年贡献了51.21亿元,占总营收的94.9%,即向加盟商卖原料和设备的B2B供应链收入。特许权使用费及加盟费收入反而同比下降了10.2%。

这套模式的核心逻辑是,门店越多,采购量越大,总部的货品收入就越高。扩张本身变成了盈利的发动机。

据公司披露,上新节奏极快,月均近10款。截至2025年末至2026年初,海外门店拓展至38家,覆盖韩国、马来西亚、新加坡、泰国、澳大利亚、法国、西班牙、美国等市场。与此同时,2024年有1144位加盟商选择终止合作(其中701位将门店转让给其他加盟商接手),关店数量达890家,是2023年220家的四倍有余。

关店数量的飙升与食品安全问题的频发互为表里。当一个加盟商面临经营困境,当总部上调原材料价格、缩减补贴,压缩成本就成了一道现实考题。部分门店被查实的违规行为,包括使用变质水果、克扣果肉小料、涂改原料效期,这些行为可以追溯到一道经济账,违规的收益是否大于成本。

这道账的关键在总部的罚则设计。北京海淀苏州街店因奶茶中出现螺丝,市监局调查确认系珍珠锅沿螺丝脱落后混入食品,行政处罚罚款500元。500元对于一个年营收54亿元的公司、对于一家门店的月流水而言,几乎可以忽略不计。违规成本远低于违规收益,制度就失去了约束力。

茶百道并非没有意识到问题。运营总裁汪红学(现任茶百道总经理)在2021年10月接受《每日经济新闻》专访时坦言,食品安全问题频发是因为“在初期发展的过程中,更注重规模扩张或者发展的速度,忽略管理机制等方面的完善”。

2025年3月,茶百道宣布引入AI大模型技术,构建从原料到出杯的食品安全管控体系,智能预警系统可以实时监控库存、效期和制备数据。

但技术工具只是手段,真正的改革在制度层面。总部需要回答几个绕不开的问题:当扩张速度与食安管控发生冲突时,谁优先?当加盟商的盈利压力与食品安全标准产生矛盾时,谁来承担成本?当一家门店出现食安事故时,罚款金额能否让所有加盟商望而生畏?

这三个问题不解决,AI监控再多、巡检频率再高,也只是在错误的土壤上播种。

总部的角色必须从“货品供应商”转向“标准制定者与执行者和品质监督者”,从“赚加盟费”转向“对每一杯出品负责”。成立独立的食安总监部门、重构加盟约束与成本分摊机制、让SOP从纸面走进后厨的每一个操作台,这些动作需要的不是技术投入,而是战略重心的彻底转移。

加盟商

夹缝中的理性与短视

加盟商是食品安全问题的直接执行者,但他们也是整个体系中最被动的一环。

茶百道对加盟商的吸引力曾经简单直接,品牌知名度、相对较低的启动成本、快速回本的预期。

据官方招商宣传材料,加盟建店预估费用17.5万元起(该口径为品牌宣传的最低门槛,实际落地单店总投入普遍在25万元以上),2025年还推出了首年0元加盟费、设备分期方案。低门槛带来了快速扩张,也带来了经营者素质的参差不齐。

当单店盈利变得困难,加盟商面临的选择题就变得残酷,严格遵循总部标准,成本居高不下,利润微薄甚至亏损。偷工减料、使用变质原料,短期内降低成本,但面临食安投诉和监管查处的高风险。

据社交平台上多位加盟商披露,淡季门店实收一天只有2000多元。济南一家核心商圈的茶百道门店关门,房东透露的原因是“加盟商与茶百道的加盟合约已经到期,且近期茶百道对加盟商原材料等费用增加,相关补贴减少,其不得已终止加盟”。

社交平台上,有加盟商直言销售额回到2020年的水平,但房租、人工、材料费都早已不是五年前的价钱。

加盟商的困境在于:他们承担了前端的所有经营风险,却对总部的定价、补贴、品控政策几乎没有话语权。总部上调原材料价格,加盟商只能接受。总部要求使用特定供应商的物料,加盟商没有议价空间。总部推出新品要求门店同步上架,加盟商必须配合采购。权力与责任的不对等,让加盟商在面临经营压力时更倾向于选择短期自保。

但这并不意味着加盟商没有出路。主动向区域督导申请损耗补贴和经营扶持、严格执行标准化操作、建立门店内部自查机制,这些动作不能解决所有问题,但至少能在现有制度框架内最大化规避风险。一个更深层的现实是,当食品安全事故发生时,损失最大的不是总部,而是门店本身。高额赔偿、门店关停、品牌解约,这些后果足以让一家小店倾家荡产。

加盟商需要想明白一个道理:合规经营的短期成本,远低于违规翻车的长期代价。

消费者

被透支的信任与最后的防线

消费者是整个链条的末端,也是问题暴露的最后一道关卡。

茶百道的投诉清单是一份触目惊心的目录。2026年1月,山西长治消费者李女士发现茶百道甜品餐具外包装发霉(据2026年1月26日信网、山东财经报道),投诉后当晚频繁接到来电、凌晨收到要求删帖短信。2026年6月,据黑猫投诉及本地媒体报道,贵州安顺学院店消费者在饮品中发现活体异物,投诉后门店回应称若维权造成损失将报警。2023至2024年间,南昌县芳草路店等多地出现青提奶茶到手已变质分层的投诉。2025年北京海淀苏州街店,一杯奶茶里喝出一颗螺丝。每一桩投诉背后,都是一次信任的断裂。

更令人不安的是处理方式。长治消费者投诉餐具发霉后,等来的不是解决方案,而是半夜的删帖电话。安顺消费者投诉后,门店的回应是“若我维权造成门店损失就要报警维权”。重庆上清寺店的消费者吃到变质芒果,商家将责任推给外卖平台。推诿、拖延、冷处理,成了售后服务的常态。

《食品安全法》第一百四十八条明确规定,消费者可要求支付价款十倍或者损失三倍的赔偿金,不足一千元的按一千元赔付。但在实际操作中,多数消费者得到的只是退款、几杯赠饮、或者几十元的象征性赔偿。法律赋予的权利与商家实际提供的解决方案之间,存在一条巨大的鸿沟。

消费者的处境是矛盾的。他们既是被动受害者,也是最后的监督者。当一个品牌反复出现食安问题,消费者的选择只有两个:继续购买并承担风险,或者用脚投票、减少复购。

2024年茶百道有1144位加盟商选择离开,而消费者层面的“离开”更加隐蔽,它体现在单店销量的下滑、体现在社交平台上越来越多的避雷帖、体现在“下次不买了”的沉默决定里。

但消费者手中还有更主动的工具。依据法律主张千元赔付、在黑猫和12315平台提交举证材料、通过短视频和社交平台客观曝光问题,这些动作的累积效应,可以倒逼总部出台统一的整改政策。

消费者的监督从来不是个体行为,当同类投诉达到一定规模,它就变成了不可忽视的市场信号。

三者之间

一场没有赢家的零和博弈

把总部、加盟商、消费者三个角色放在一起看,一个清晰的因果链条浮现出来。

总部的扩张优先战略和盈利模式,埋下了管控失效的种子。加盟商在成本压力和制度漏洞的双重夹击下,选择了短期自保的违规操作。消费者成为最终的受害者,他们的投诉和维权暴露了问题,却无法从根本上改变问题的生成机制。

这是一场没有赢家的零和博弈。总部获得了营收增长,却失去了品牌信誉。加盟商节省了短期成本,却面临关店和赔偿的长期风险。消费者支付了真金白银,得到的却是一杯可能变质的饮品和一次艰难的维权经历。

茶百道2025年财报显示净利润同比增长71%,经调整净利润率从13.1%提升至15.4%。但这份成绩单建立在1144位加盟商离开、890家门店关闭的基础之上。利润的增长究竟是经营效率的提升,还是成本转嫁的结果?答案藏在每一家被迫关门的门店里,藏在每一条关于变质水果的投诉里,藏在每一个深夜被要求删帖的消费者手机里。

汪红学在2021年说过的那句话至今仍有回响,“从制度和管理体系上建立食品安全管理的流程、团队、标准和供应链体系”。这句话的潜台词是,过去十几年,这套体系并不存在。

补课的时间窗口不会永远敞开。当消费者的耐心被耗尽,当加盟商的信心被消磨,当监管的利剑落下,再多的爆款、再快的扩张、再美的财报,都挡不住信任崩塌的连锁反应。

茶百道需要的不是更多的AI监控、更多的道歉声明、更多的营销投入,而是一次从顶层开始的、彻底的制度重构。

总部管住自己的扩张冲动,加盟商算清违规的长期代价,消费者用好手中的法律武器,只有当这三个齿轮同时转动,食品安全才有可能从口号变成现实。

否则,下一杯含牛油果的饮品卖出的每一杯,都可能成为下一次事故的序章。

注:文/RBF内容组,文章来源:零售商业财经(公众号ID:RetailFinace),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:零售商业财经

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0