广告
加载中

赛力斯机器人曝光 车企为何自研机器人?

关注前沿科技的 2026-06-25 16:34
关注前沿科技的 2026/06/25 16:34

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

总:本文主要披露了赛力斯首次公开展示自研具身智能机器人的成果,同时介绍了当前车企扎堆布局人形机器人赛道的行业整体情况,核心干货如下

1. 赛力斯此次推出的小赛系列机器人,采用差异化研发路径:本体由赛力斯自研,AI大脑交给火山引擎开发,双方合作攻关核心技术,从签约到机器人上岗仅用不到一年时间,落地效率远高于行业平均水平。

2. 赛力斯没有跟风做通用全人形机器人,而是根据工业场景的具体任务反向定义机器人形态,组成异构机器人集群,主要填补传统工业机器人无法完成的柔性作业缺口,已经在赛力斯超级工厂实现上岗应用。

3. 当前政策端已经启动人形机器人与具身智能实景实训专项行动,明确将工业制造列为首要落地场景,2026年被行业视为人形机器人量产元年,赛道已经进入落地验证的关键阶段。

总:本文呈现了当前车企布局具身智能机器人的行业趋势,能给各类品牌商的产品研发和新赛道布局提供多方面参考,核心内容如下

1. 产品研发层面:赛力斯采用分工合作的研发模式,只做自己擅长的本体研发,将核心AI大脑交给专业技术厂商,复刻了此前和华为合作打造问界品牌的成功经验,大幅缩短了研发落地周期,降低了自研风险,这种分工研发模式值得新赛道布局的品牌商借鉴。

2. 增长趋势层面:当前硬件与智能化高度内卷的环境下,具身智能机器人已经成为车企寻找新增量的核心赛道,小米、小鹏、比亚迪等多个头部品牌已经入场,政策也明确支持工业落地,未来除了B端制造,C端零售、服务、陪伴都是可开拓的消费方向,新消费增长空间广阔。

3. 生产端价值层面:具身智能机器人可以解决总装环节柔性作业缺口,适配智能汽车更快的改款节奏,能帮助品牌提升生产效率,适配行业快速迭代的趋势。

总:本文披露了当前具身智能机器人赛道的发展现状,给赛道相关从业者提供了机会参考与风险提示,核心干货如下

1. 市场机会层面:当前政策明确将工业制造列为具身智能首要落地场景,2026年就是人形机器人量产元年,赛道已经进入落地爆发期,具身数据已经成为行业核心争夺资源,一级市场多家具身数据公司获得数亿元融资,大厂也纷纷布局数据平台,相关配套卖家有很大的增长空间。

2. 模式参考层面:赛力斯走出了不同于全栈自研、机器人厂商进厂试点的第三条路径,也就是本体自研+大脑外接+场景反向定义,落地效率极高,不到一年就实现上产线,比起全栈自研成本更低、试错风险更小,适合新入场的玩家借鉴。

3. 风险提示层面:当前行业已经开始关注投入产出比,短时间推出多品类机器人能否实现盈利还待市场验证,从业者需要避免盲目跟风布局,重点关注落地效果与投入回报比。

总:本文介绍了赛力斯超级工厂应用具身智能机器人的实践经验,对工厂推进数字化智能化升级有较强的参考价值,核心干货如下

1. 升级需求明确:当前多数汽车工厂的冲压、焊接、涂装三大工艺自动化率已经可以做到80%以上,部分头部工厂达到100%,但总装环节自动化率仅20%-30%,大量非标柔性作业是传统程序化设备无法完成的,这正是具身智能机器人的核心切入空间,可以补足现有自动化体系的缺口。

2. 落地思路可借鉴:赛力斯没有盲目跟风追求通用人形机器人,而是根据工厂现有自动化节奏和具体任务反向设计机器人形态,针对不同任务匹配轮足、带检测枪的人形、固定机械臂等不同形态,组成异构具身智能集群,可以无缝适配现有工厂体系,直接提升产线效率,比追求通用机器人的思路更实用。

3. 效率提升明显:具身智能机器人依靠视觉识别和大模型推理适配新车型,不需要传统模式几个月的程序调试,能适配智能汽车比传统燃油车快一倍的改款节奏,帮助工厂加快新品落地速度,目前赛力斯的机器人已经完成初步上岗验证,落地路径已经走通。

总:本文梳理了当前具身智能行业的落地趋势与客户痛点,给相关服务商指明了业务方向,核心内容如下

1. 行业发展趋势:当前具身智能已经进入工业落地的关键阶段,2026年是人形机器人量产元年,工信部联合国资委启动了专项行动,明确将工业制造列为首要落地场景,政策与市场双重推动下,工业领域的具身智能相关服务需求会大幅增长,服务商有较大的市场空间。

2. 客户核心痛点:制造业工厂真正需要的不是单一功能的通用人形机器人,而是可以直接提升产线整体设备效率的系统方案,目前很多机器人厂商盲目追求通用化,无法适配工厂现有数字生态,不能解决实际生产问题,这正是服务商的核心机会。

3. 合作与业务方向:当前产业分工趋势越来越明显,生产端擅长做本体和场景落地,需要专业服务商提供AI大模型、云边协同、具身数据等核心技术与服务,赛力斯与火山引擎的合作就是典型案例,同时具身数据已经成为行业刚需,相关数据运营、数据供应服务也有很大的市场需求。

总:本文呈现了当前具身智能产业发展对平台的需求,给平台布局相关业务、规避行业风向提供了参考,核心内容如下

1. 需求洞察:当前具身智能产业落地呈现明显的分工化趋势,新的落地路径是本体研发与AI大脑分离,具备制造能力和场景的企业负责本体开发,需要专业平台提供AI大模型、多模态云边协同等核心技术支持,赛力斯选择与火山引擎合作攻关就是典型案例,这是技术平台的新增量机会。

2. 核心业务方向:当前具身数据已经成为全行业争夺的核心资源,百度、京东等大厂已经率先布局具身数据相关平台,抢夺数据运营的市场蛋糕,平台商可以抓住行业风口,针对性布局具身数据服务、产业合作对接平台,满足行业发展需求。

3. 招商与运营参考:越来越多有制造能力的生产企业下场布局机器人,这类企业自带场景和落地能力,平台可以针对性开展招商,围绕分工合作的产业趋势搭建对接生态,帮助本体、AI技术、数据等不同环节的企业对接,降低全行业落地成本,同时规避盲目追逐通用人形机器人、忽视实际落地效果的行业风向。

总:本文披露了当前具身智能产业落地的最新动向,为产业研究提供了新的案例与研究方向,核心内容如下

1. 产业落地新动向:当前大批车企扎堆下场布局具身智能机器人,走出了不同于原有机器人厂商从C端向B端渗透、或是从B端向C端拓展的路径,开创了原生落地工厂,基于工厂原有数字生态反向定义机器人的“工厂体系+机器人”新模式,是行业全新的落地范式,值得深入研究。

2. 商业模式创新:赛力斯提出了不同于全栈自研、机器人厂商进厂合作的第三条研发路径,也就是“本体自研+AI大脑外接”的分工商业模式,复刻了问界品牌合作的成功经验,落地速度远快于传统模式,为产业分工协作提供了新的样本。

3. 新研究课题:当前行业已经从技术验证阶段转向关注投入产出比,车企卡位赛道,一方面是为了补足生产端柔性作业的缺口,适配快迭代的行业节奏,另一方面是为了抢占具身数据这一核心资源,这种全新的产业竞争逻辑,为研究产业竞争新方向提供了新的课题,同时政策端已经启动专项行动推进行业落地,也为产业政策研究提供了新的背景。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article features Seres' first public unveiling of its self-developed embodied intelligent robot, and outlines the current industry trend of automakers rushing into the humanoid robot track. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Seres' new "Xiaosai" robot series adopts a differentiated R&D path: the robot hardware is developed in-house, while the AI "brain" is built in partnership with Volcano Engine. It took less than one year from the signing of the partnership to the deployment of the robot on the production line, a go-to-market speed far outpacing the industry average.

2. Instead of following the crowd to develop general-purpose full humanoid robots, Seres defined robot forms based on specific industrial tasks, and built a heterogeneous robot cluster to fill the gap in flexible tasks that traditional industrial robots cannot complete. The robots have already been deployed at Seres' super factory.

3. Chinese regulators have launched a special initiative for on-site training of humanoid robots and embodied intelligence, explicitly naming industrial manufacturing as the priority application scenario. The industry broadly views 2026 as the first year of mass production for humanoid robots, and the track has now entered a critical phase of use case validation.

This article outlines the current industry trend of automakers entering the embodied intelligent robot space, and provides multiple insights for brand owners on product R&D and new track expansion. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. For R&D strategy: Seres adopts a division-of-labor development model, focusing on its core strength of robot hardware development and outsourcing AI brain development to a specialized tech provider. This model replicates the successful partnership that built the AITO brand with Huawei, drastically shortening the R&D cycle and reducing in-house development risk — a model well worth learning for brands entering new tracks.

2. For growth outlook: Against the backdrop of intense competition in both hardware and smart vehicle features, embodied intelligent robots have become a core new growth track for automakers. Leading players including Xiaomi, Xpeng and BYD have already entered the space, and policy clearly supports industrial adoption. Beyond B2B manufacturing, C-end retail, service and companion robots represent large untapped consumer markets with broad growth potential.

3. For production value: Embodied intelligent robots can fill the gap in flexible assembly work, adapt to the faster product iteration cycle of smart vehicles, improve production efficiency, and help brands keep up with the industry's fast iteration trend.

This article discloses the current development status of the embodied intelligent robot track, and provides opportunity and risk insights for industry practitioners. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Market opportunities: Policy has explicitly designated industrial manufacturing as the priority landing scenario for embodied intelligence, with 2026 marked as the first year of mass production for humanoid robots. The track is entering a phase of accelerated commercial deployment, and embodied data has become a core competitive resource. Multiple embodied data startups have secured hundreds of millions of yuan in Series A funding, and large tech firms are all building out their own data platforms, creating significant growth opportunities for related component and service suppliers.

2. Model reference: Seres has pioneered a third path alternative to both full-stack in-house development and the traditional robot-vendor pilot model: in-house hardware development + third-party AI brain + task-based robot definition. This approach delivers far faster deployment, achieving production line integration in less than a year, with lower costs and smaller trial-and-error risks than full-stack development — a strong model for new entrants to learn from.

3. Risk warning: The industry is now increasingly focused on return on investment. It remains to be seen whether launching multiple robot categories in a short timeframe can deliver profitability. Practitioners should avoid blind follow-the-crowd expansion, and prioritize real-world deployment performance and ROI.

This article shares Seres Super Factory's practical experience in deploying embodied intelligent robots, which offers strong reference value for factories pursuing digital and intelligent upgrades. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Clear upgrade needs: For most auto plants, the stamping, welding and painting processes already achieve over 80% automation, with some leading plants reaching 100% automation. However, assembly line automation only hits 20% to 30%, as a large number of non-standard flexible tasks cannot be completed by traditional programmed equipment. This is exactly the core entry point for embodied intelligent robots, which can fill the gap in existing automation systems.

2. replicable deployment strategy: Instead of blindly chasing general-purpose humanoid robots, Seres reverse-engineered robot forms based on the plant's existing automation workflow and specific tasks. It matched different task requirements with different robot forms including wheeled robots, humanoid robots with inspection guns, and fixed robotic arms, to build a heterogeneous embodied intelligence cluster. This approach seamlessly integrates with existing factory systems and directly improves production line efficiency, making it far more practical than the general-purpose robot-first approach.

3. Tangible efficiency gains: Embodied intelligent robots adapt to new vehicle models via visual recognition and large model inference, eliminating the months-long programming debugging required by traditional automation. This adapts to the twice-as-fast product iteration cycle of smart vehicles compared to traditional fuel vehicles, and helps factories speed up new product launches. Seres' robots have already completed initial deployment validation, proving the commercial path is viable.

This article sorts out the current deployment trends and customer pain points in the embodied intelligence industry, and points out clear business directions for related service providers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trend: Embodied intelligence has now entered a critical phase of industrial deployment, with 2026 as the first year of mass production for humanoid robots. China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission have jointly launched a special initiative that names industrial manufacturing as the priority application scenario. Driven by both policy and market demand, demand for embodied intelligence-related services in the industrial sector will grow substantially, creating large market opportunities for service providers.

2. Core customer pain points: Manufacturing factories do not actually need single-function general-purpose humanoid robots; they need system solutions that directly improve overall production line efficiency. Currently, many robot vendors blindly pursue general-purpose designs that cannot integrate with factories' existing digital ecosystems and fail to solve real production problems — this is exactly the core opportunity for service providers.

3. Partnership and business directions: Industrial specialization is becoming increasingly clear: manufacturing players excel at hardware development and on-site deployment, and need professional service providers to deliver core technologies and services including large AI models, cloud-edge collaboration, and embodied data. The Seres-Volcano Engine partnership is a typical example. In addition, embodied data has become an industry-wide刚需, creating large market demand for data operation and data supply services.

This article outlines the changing demand for platforms driven by the development of the embodied intelligence industry, and provides reference for platforms to layout related businesses and avoid industry risks. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Demand insight: The commercialization of embodied intelligence is now following a clear trend of specialization, with a new deployment path that separates hardware development from AI brain development. Manufacturing players with production capacity and on-site scenarios take charge of hardware development, and need professional platforms to provide core technical support including large AI models and multi-modal cloud-edge collaboration. Seres' partnership with Volcano Engine is a typical example, representing a new growth opportunity for technology platforms.

2. Core business direction: Embodied data has become a core resource competed by the entire industry. Large tech firms including Baidu and JD.com have already moved first to layout embodied data platforms to capture market share in data operation. Platforms can capitalize on this industry trend, and build targeted embodied data services and industrial matching platforms to meet industry development needs.

3. Reference for recruitment and operation: A growing number of manufacturing players with production capacity are entering the robot space, and these companies already have in-house scenarios and deployment capabilities. Platforms can carry out targeted recruitment, build a matching ecosystem aligned with the division-of-labor industry trend, and connect players across hardware, AI technology, data and other segments to reduce deployment costs for the entire industry. This also helps avoid the industry pitfall of blindly chasing general-purpose humanoid robots while ignoring real-world deployment performance.

This article discloses the latest developments in the commercialization of the embodied intelligence industry, and provides new cases and research directions for industry research. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New industry development trend: A large number of automakers are now entering the embodied intelligent robot space, and have forged a path different from the traditional approach of existing robot vendors, which expand from C-end to B-end or vice versa. They have created a new "factory ecosystem + robot" paradigm, where robots are natively deployed in factories and reverse-defined based on the factory's existing digital ecosystem. This is an entirely new commercialization paradigm worthy of in-depth research.

2. Business model innovation: Seres has developed a third R&D path alternative to full-stack in-house development and traditional robot vendor-factory partnership, with a division-of-labor business model of "in-house hardware + outsourced AI brain". This replicates the successful cooperation experience of the AITO brand, delivers far faster deployment than traditional models, and provides a new sample for industrial division of labor and collaboration.

3. New research topics: The industry has shifted from the technology validation phase to a focus on return on investment. When automakers enter this track, they aim not only to fill the gap in flexible production work and adapt to the fast iteration industry trend, but also to capture the core resource of embodied data. This entirely new industry competition logic creates new research topics for studying modern industrial competition. In addition, the government's launch of a special initiative to drive industry deployment also provides new context for industrial policy research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

前沿科技,数智经济

做自己擅长的,大脑交给别人。

文|罗镇昊

编|刘俊宏

6月15日,重庆龙兴赛力斯超级工厂,机器人“小赛”系列集体亮相。这是赛力斯自去年宣布推动具身智能落地以来,首次公开展示其研发成果。

一台具备多模态感知能力的人形机器人“小赛”,全程进行导览。其他成员则以“上岗”的形式一一亮相:负责底盘装配检测的小赛01,用于整车外观检测的小赛02,产线两侧的协同机械臂,搬运货物的AGV,以及空中物流无人机。

在这座高度自动化的工厂里,已有1600多台智能化设备和3000多台工业机器人同步工作,小赛们的加入,主要是承载传统工业机器人无法实现的柔性作业。

可以看见,在机器人设计上,赛力斯并没有执着通用和全员人形,而是根据特定任务决定机器人的形态和能力。有的是轮足,有的手部是检测枪,有的本体是机械臂,这种从工业场景反向定义机器人的思路,也许能为行业提供一种新范式。

值得注意的是,和行业主流的全栈自研或智驾技术迁移路径不同,在机器人研发上,赛力斯选择把大脑交给火山。

2025年10月,赛力斯子公司凤凰智创与火山引擎签署了《具身智能业务合作框架协议》,双方围绕多模态云边协同、控制与人机增强技术项目协同攻关。简单说就是,本体由赛力斯自研,大脑由火山承接。不难看出,这套模式和之前做问界时有相似之处。

这次“战略合纵”能否复刻“问界式”的成功,还得看小赛们能不能触达制造业的神经。

塞力斯机器人

把“大脑”交给火山?

具身智能浪潮席卷之下,工业落地是今年行业里最关键的命题。

2026年6月,工信部、国资委联合启动“人形机器人与具身智能实景实训专项行动”,明确年底开启人形机器人与具身智能“作业模式”,将工业制造列入首要落地场景。

为了实现这一目标,目前行业内主要存在两类实现方式:

一种是全栈自研,将智驾技术延申到机器人上。最典型的是特斯拉Optimus,原本为自动驾驶研发的AI5芯片,马斯克表示也将用在机器人身上。何小鹏亲自带队的IRON,则共享车端同款图灵AI芯片和天玑AIOS。

另一种是机器人厂商跟工厂合作,让机器人在确定性的场景中“打工”。比如智元,去年就将近百台远征A2-W落进汽车零部件厂富临精工,覆盖三条装配线的搬运工作。众擎主打的工业机器人T800,今年也被部署到华南头部3C电子组装厂里,进行试点验证。

而赛力斯走的是第三条路——本体自研,大脑外接,再应用于工厂制造。

选择这一路径,赛力斯有自己基于经验的考量。

在过去的合作中,问界品牌就是一个“灵魂与肉体”合作的成功案例。2021年赛力斯和华为深度合作,华为把HarmonyOS智能座舱、HUAWEI ADS高阶智驾、DriveONE电驱平台、质量管控体系一起搬过来,赛力斯负责整车制造和品控。这套分工让问界一度成为高端新能源汽车里最成功的品牌之一。

如今,赛力斯把同样的模式复刻到机器人上——自己做擅长的硬件,智能化交给会做的人。

目前来看,这套模式至少让赛力斯获得了不错的落地效率。从去年10月和火山引擎签订协议,到今年6月各形态机器人已经上岗,不到一年时间,从0到上产线,这个速度不可谓不快。此外,赛力斯副总裁康波表示,今年内还将推出覆盖C端零售、服务、陪伴和B端制造、物流的更多机器人。

但在具身智能行业越来越多探讨ROI的2026年,赛力斯一下子推出这么多种类的机器人,能划得来吗?

车企为什么纷纷下场做机器人?

无论是硬件还是智能化都高度内卷的今天,机器人赛道成了车企寻找新增长的聚集地。

前有小米、小鹏、理想,后有长安、比亚迪,每隔一段时间就有新玩家入局。目前,奇瑞墨甲M1已上线京东自营开始售卖,小鹏的新一代IRON预计今年底进入量产,长安今年3月注册了"天枢智能机器人",近期又传出比亚迪下场做机器人的消息。

花这么多钱造机器人,车企们到底图什么?

起码在赛力斯这边,给工厂降本或许并不是第一目标。财务数据显示,2025年赛力斯整车毛利率高达29.14%,到2026年第一季度,仍维持在26.24%的高位。再看成本侧,2025年Q3,赛力斯单车平均成本为23.75万元,与同级对标友商理想的23.48万元基本持平。

对比智能汽车同行来看,无论是盈利质量还是单车成本,赛力斯均位于比较合理的区间,并没有释放费用空间和净利润的压力。

但如果聚焦生产制造本身看,机器人对工厂就有了更深层意义。

汽车四大工艺——冲压、焊接、涂装、总装,前三道的自动化率大部分车厂已经能轻松做到80%,甚至一些头部车企能直接拉到100%。而在总装部分,只有20%-30%。这些非标+灵活的工作,恰恰是程序化机械设备不擅长,却最适合具身智能切入的环节。

比如整车质检环节,缝隙、面差、油漆、异响,每一项都要凭经验来感知和决策。这意味着,真正值钱的不是省下的成本,而是让机器人去做传统自动化做不了事。

根据赛力斯超级工厂的展示:小赛01做底盘装配质量检测,小赛02做整车外观配置检测,两款人形机器人本质上都在用AI视觉+灵活执行去补足柔性作业的部分。通过现场演示看到,虽然赛力斯的机器人仍处于初级阶段,但已经算是能够用起来了。

而且,当产线更换车型时,具身智能机器人往往也适应得更快。

传统工业机器人虽能通过RFID识别系统在两种车型之间秒级切换,但这种切换依赖的是预设程序库,每加入一款新车型,SOP前的调试往往要花上几个月。而小赛这类依靠视觉识别和大模型推理的具身智能,完全可以做到直接上手。

这种适应能力,或许才能适应当下智能汽车迭代的节奏。毕竟相比传统燃油车时代,智能汽车的改款迭代速度要快上一倍。同时,车企也希望能通过机器人的实际使用,卡位具身智能赛道。

数据和场景

车企卡位具身智能

2026年人形机器人产业进入量产元年。当本体和运动能力已经逐步验证,数据作为机器人大脑能力成长的重中之重,近期在各种论坛上不断被提起。

具身数据已经成为整个机器人产业链“兵家必争之地”。

在一级市场,具身数据公司被“抢疯了”。6月1日,简智机器人宣布完成连续多轮共数亿元融资,成为“无本体数据”领域累计融资金额最高的公司。在今年,还有光轮智能、无问智科、核数聚等多家主做具身数据的公司先后完成了融资。

同样的竞争,也在大厂的战略中体现。今年4月,百度智能云和京东先后发布数据相关平台,抢夺数据运营的蛋糕。今年2月,智元拆分出觅蜂科技,要做具身智能数据供应商。

而像赛力斯这样的超级工厂,本身就是真实数据和真实需求的来源。结合机器人落地的方式能看到,车企们似乎在寻找具身智能行业一种新的落地范式——根据场景反向定义机器人。

在过往的具身智能应用落地里,机器人厂商往往只能在B端和C端先选择一条路线。

例如宇树、智元这类玩家,走的是从C端向B端渗透的路线。比如宇树的H1和智元的A1,就是靠优越的运动性能和多模态感知走上舞台,先服务娱乐行业和教育市场,然后再密集进入工厂做“实训”,验证工业落地。

特斯拉基本反过来,从B端向C端拓展。Optimus从立项第一天起,就是为了在特斯拉超级工厂里代替人干活,然后再尝试实现家庭场景。弗里蒙特工厂里的电池分拣、零部件搬运,都是它过去一年多主要的工作场景。对于家用版Optimus,马斯克表示,要等到2027年甚至更晚才能真正量产。

但在车企这边,机器人“原生”落地工厂应用,走的是“工厂体系+机器人”的模式。它基于工厂原有的数字生态体系,倒推机器人应该具备什么能力,做成什么样子。

展示中可以看到,赛力斯并没有执着全员人形,而是根据自动化工厂原有的节奏,以及特定任务来设计机器人的形态和能力。

负责检测的人形机器人,可以像人一样多自由度检测不同点位,也并需要灵巧手,直接装一个检测枪;而在固定位置就能满足所有点位检测的地方,就做成机械臂;形成了一个“异构具身智能集群”,跟工厂协同。

技术层面,相比头部机器人公司,无论是卷运动能力还是大模型,本质上都在把机器人往通用这条路推。赛力斯更关注的,是机器人能不能在已有的工厂体系里无缝衔接。

对制造业来说,它们最需要的不是干单一工种的明星员工,而是一套能直接提升产线OEE的系统方案。如果“机器人班组+数字化系统”的模式验证成功,这套组合就可以向其他车企复制。

注:文/关注前沿科技的,文章来源:光锥智能(公众号ID:guangzhui-tech),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:光锥智能

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0