广告
加载中

智谱市值上万亿 半个公司身家过亿

陶辉东 2026-06-23 09:08
陶辉东 2026/06/23 09:08

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章核心讲了中国大模型企业智谱,从上市初528亿港元市值,仅用不到半年时间暴涨超18倍,冲破1万亿港元市值的逆袭故事,核心干货信息如下:

1.智谱的发展历程:早期做C端产品没做起来,转做不被资本市场看好的政企定制私有化部署,干了多年苦活累活,积累了场景数据和国产芯片适配能力,之后连续推出全球顶级的开源SOTA大模型,带动API收入爆发,彻底扭转市场认知。

2.可参考的经验启示:创业不一定要追热点走性感的轻模式,深耕下沉场景、专注技术持续迭代,反而能建立别人拿不走的壁垒;早期加入技术驱动的创业公司,获得股权有机会实现高额财富回报。

本文对大模型领域的品牌商有多方面干货参考,具体如下:

1.定价与竞争层面:在行业普遍打价格战的背景下,智谱凭借顶级SOTA技术逆势提价,提价后调用量反而同比增长400%,说明核心技术能力远比重低价竞争更能获得市场认可,技术壁垒是品牌定价权的核心支撑。

2.市场拓展路径:智谱先深耕B端政企高要求场景积累信任和技术,再将信任溢出到通用商业市场和C端,这种路径比直接烧钱做C端破圈更稳健,适合技术型品牌参考。

3.品牌打造层面:智谱抓住行业痛点,在顶级闭源模型被下架后全量开源同级别模型,打出“科技不应该只属于少数人”的定位,快速获得全球开发者认可,成功建立了优质品牌口碑。

本文给大模型领域的相关从业者卖家,整理了这些机会、经验和风险提示:

1.市场机会层面:开源大模型、政企私有化部署、国产信创适配领域存在巨大增长空间,当前全球开发者对可自主掌控、能力对标顶级闭源模型的高性价比开源大模型需求强烈,政企对数据安全要求高,本地化部署需求长期稳定。

2.可学习的经验:不要一味追捧轻模式标准化生意,深耕行业场景干苦活累活,反而能积累独有的场景数据和技术壁垒,B端项目积累的能力可以反向赋能核心产品,实现全业务增长。

3.风险提示:当前大模型行业估值泡沫明显,智谱以7亿年营收支撑万亿市值,千倍市销率不可持续,未来解禁后稀缺性溢价可能消退;同时行业技术迭代极快,跟不上SOTA节奏就会被快速淘汰,需要持续投入研发。

本文对传统工厂对接AI、推进数字化转型有这些干货启示:

1.商业机会层面:当前金融、能源、石化、政务等各个实体行业,都需要适配自身场景的定制大模型,对数据不出内网的私有化部署、国产芯片适配方案需求强烈,工厂可以依托自身行业经验,对接大模型厂商开拓相关AI服务业务,挖掘新增量。

2.数字化转型启示:智谱从一个个小场景干起,逐步积累数据优化核心能力最终逆袭的路径,对工厂数字化转型同样适用,不用一开始就追求完美的通用解决方案,可以从自身生产的核心场景需求出发,逐步迭代打磨能力。

3.合作方向参考:工厂如果自身缺乏大模型研发能力,可以和智谱这类成熟厂商合作,依托标准化基座开发适配自身生产流程的行业大模型,还可以借助厂商的培训体系解决自身二次开发能力不足的问题,降低转型成本。

本文给AI行业服务商提供了这些行业趋势、痛点和解决方案干货:

1.行业发展趋势:当前大模型竞争已经进入SOTA即顶级技术竞争阶段,跟不上迭代节奏就会被立刻踢出顶级玩家队列,开源大模型已经成为全球市场的主流方向,开发者对高性价比顶级开源模型需求爆发,国产信创适配是国内服务商的核心壁垒。

2.客户核心痛点:政企客户最核心的需求是数据安全,要求数据不出内网,同时多数政企客户缺乏大模型二次开发能力;全球开发者客户缺少能媲美顶级闭源模型的高性价比开源替代方案。

3.可参考的解决方案:针对政企客户,可以采用“标准化基座模型+定制化私有化部署”模式,和国产芯片厂商合作推出一体机方案满足数据安全要求,配套建立培训体系帮扶客户完成二次开发,这种模式既能保持较高毛利率,还能通过项目积累反向优化核心模型能力。

本文给AI相关平台商的运营、招商和风险规避提供了这些参考干货:

1.市场需求层面:当前全球开发者对顶级开源大模型的传播、使用需求强烈,引入优质顶级开源大模型可以快速吸引开发者流量,提升平台影响力,平台可以重点布局这类资源引入。

2.招商和运营方向:大模型领域的优质项目不一定是短期就能C端破圈的热门项目,类似智谱这类早期深耕技术和场景、不被看好的项目,反而能带来超额回报,平台招商不能只看短期流量,要重点考察技术储备和场景积累能力。

3.风险规避要点:大模型行业技术迭代极快,需要警惕项目技术掉队风险;当前行业已经出现明显估值泡沫,千倍市销率、低自由流通股带来的稀缺性溢价不可持续,未来解禁后估值可能回调,平台需要做好风险提示,引导市场关注项目真实的盈利能力和可持续商业模式,避免炒概念。

本文为AI产业研究者提供了这些关于产业新动向、新问题和商业模式的研究素材:

1.产业新动向:中国大模型产业已经探索出不同于海外的新发展路径,不同于OpenAI的纯标准化调用模式,也不同于AI四小龙的纯项目外包模式,智谱走出了“标准化基座+定制化私有化部署”的新路径,依靠B端场景积累反向优化模型,再带动API和通用市场增长,为中国大模型产业发展提供了新样本。

2.值得研究的新问题:当前AI行业的估值逻辑存在明显波动,早期市场不认可重模式,短时间内又给出万亿估值,千倍市销率的估值泡沫、低自由流通股带来的稀缺性溢价可持续性,都值得深入研究;此外技术快速迭代下,企业如何保持竞争力也是重要研究方向。

3.商业模式创新:智谱的模式打破了“政企定制模式一定边际成本高、难以规模化”的传统认知,依靠标准化基座保持了40%以上的行业较高毛利率,还验证了政企项目的技术溢出效应,为大模型商业模式创新提供了新的研究方向。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article tells the turnaround story of Chinese large language model (LLM) firm Zhipu AI: just six months after its public listing, its market cap surged over 18x from HK$52.8 billion to surpass HK$1 trillion. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Zhipu's growth journey: After its early consumer-facing products failed to gain traction, Zhipu pivoted to customized private deployments for government and enterprise clients—a segment once dismissed by capital markets. For years, it focused on this unglamorous work, accumulated scenario-specific data and built up adaptation capability for domestic chips. It later launched a series of world-class open-source SOTA (state-of-the-art) LLMs, driving explosive growth in its API revenue and completely reversing market perception of the company.

2. Key lessons: Startup success does not always require chasing hot, "sexy" asset-light business models. Deep diving into underserved vertical scenarios and focusing on sustained technology iteration can instead build defensible moats that competitors cannot replicate. For early employees, joining a technology-driven startup and securing equity can deliver outsized financial returns.

This article offers valuable takeaways for brands operating in the LLM industry, as outlined below:

1. Pricing and competition: Against an industry-wide trend of cutthroat price competition, Zhipu AI raised prices despite its leading SOTA technology. Following the price hike, model call volumes grew 400% year-over-year. This demonstrates that core technological capability wins far more market recognition than competing on low prices, and technical moats are the core foundation of a brand's pricing power.

2. Go-to-market strategy: Zhipu first focused on building trust and refining its technology through serving high-requirement government and enterprise clients, before extending that trust into general commercial markets and consumer segments. This path is far more sustainable than burning cash to win mass consumer adoption upfront, and serves as a strong reference for technology-focused brands.

3. Brand building: When top closed-source LLMs were pulled from the Chinese market, Zhipu seized the industry pain point and open-sourced a full LLM of comparable capability, positioning itself around the tagline "Technology should not be limited to a small few". This quickly won recognition from global developers and built a strong positive brand reputation.

This article outlines key opportunities, lessons and risk warnings for industry practitioners and sellers in the LLM space:

1. Market opportunities: There is enormous room for growth in open-source LLMs, government and enterprise private deployments, and domestic technology adaptation for China's "Xinchuang" domestic digital innovation initiative. Global developers have strong, unmet demand for cost-effective open-source LLMs that match the capability of top closed-source models while allowing full independent control. Meanwhile, government and enterprise clients have long-term stable demand for on-premise deployment driven by strict data security requirements.

2. Key lessons: Instead of blindly pursuing light, standardized business models, focusing on unglamorous deep work in vertical industry scenarios allows players to accumulate unique scenario data and build technical moats. Capabilities honed through B-side projects can in turn empower core products, driving growth across the entire business.

3. Risk warnings: Valuation bubbles are already obvious in the current LLM industry. Zhipu supports a HK$1 trillion market cap with just HK$700 million in annual revenue, resulting in a 1,000x price-to-sales ratio that is unsustainable. The scarcity premium driven by low free float is likely to fade after lock-up expirations. In addition, the industry's pace of technological iteration is extremely fast: companies that cannot keep up with the SOTA frontier will be淘汰 quickly, requiring sustained heavy R&D investment.

This article offers key insights for traditional manufacturing factories looking to integrate AI and advance digital transformation:

1. Business opportunities: Virtually all physical industry sectors—including finance, energy, petrochemicals and government services—now require custom LLMs adapted to their specific use cases, with strong demand for private deployments that keep data within internal networks and adaptation solutions for domestic chips. Factories can leverage their deep industry experience to partner with LLM vendors and expand into this AI service business, unlocking new growth.

2. Insights for digital transformation: Zhipu's path of starting with small use cases, gradually accumulating data to refine core capabilities, and ultimately achieving a market breakthrough is applicable to factory digital transformation. Factories do not need to pursue a perfect, general-purpose solution from the start. They can instead start by addressing core needs in their own key production scenarios, and iterate and refine capabilities incrementally.

3. Guidance on partnerships: Factories that lack in-house LLM R&D capability can partner with established players like Zhipu AI. They can build industry-specific LLMs adapted to their own production processes based on Zhipu's standardized base model, and leverage the vendor's training systems to address gaps in in-house secondary development capability, lowering overall transformation costs.

This article summarizes key industry trends, pain points and actionable solutions for AI industry service providers:

1. Industry trends: LLM competition has now entered an era defined by SOTA (state-of-the-art) technological competition. Players that cannot keep up with the iteration pace will be immediately pushed out of the top tier of the industry. Open-source LLMs have become the mainstream direction in the global market, with developer demand for cost-effective top-tier open-source models surging. Adaptation to China's domestic Xinchuang innovation framework is the core moat for domestic service providers.

2. Core customer pain points: For government and enterprise clients, the top priority is data security, with a requirement to keep all data within internal networks, while most lack in-house capability for LLM secondary development. For global developers, there is a widespread lack of cost-effective open-source alternatives that match the performance of leading closed-source models.

3. Actionable solutions: For government and enterprise clients, service providers can adopt a "standard base model + customized private deployment" model, partner with domestic chip makers to deliver integrated on-premise solutions to meet data security requirements, and set up dedicated training systems to support clients' secondary development. This model maintains healthy gross margins, while the project experience gained can be used to iteratively improve the core base model.

This article offers actionable references for AI-related platform operators on operations, business development and risk mitigation:

1. Market demand: Global developers currently have strong demand for accessing and using top-tier open-source LLMs. Adding high-quality leading open-source LLMs to a platform can quickly attract developer traffic and boost platform influence, so platforms should prioritize this type of resource introduction.

2. Business development and operations direction: The most promising LLM projects are not always hot projects that achieve mass consumer traction in the short term. Underappreciated early-stage projects like Zhipu AI, which focused on deep technology and scenario accumulation, can deliver far higher returns. Platforms should not evaluate projects solely based on short-term traffic, and should prioritize technical depth and scenario accumulation when sourcing new projects.

3. Risk mitigation: The LLM industry's pace of technological iteration is extremely fast, so platforms need to watch for the risk of portfolio projects falling behind the technology frontier. Obvious valuation bubbles have already emerged in the industry: the scarcity premium driven by 1,000x price-to-sales ratios and low free float is unsustainable, and valuations are likely to correct after lock-up expirations. Platforms should communicate these risks clearly, guide the market to focus on projects' actual profitability and sustainable business models, and discourage pure concept-driven speculation.

This article provides research materials on new industry trends, open questions and business model innovation for AI industry researchers:

1. New industry trends: China's LLM industry has developed a distinct growth path different from global peers. Unlike OpenAI's pure standardized API model or the pure project outsourcing model used by China's early leading AI firms, Zhipu AI has forged a new path of "standard base model + customized private deployment". It refined its model through B-side scenario accumulation, then used that improved model to drive growth in API services and the general market, creating a new archetype for LLM development in China.

2. Key open research questions: Valuation logic in the current AI industry is highly volatile. The market rejected heavy-asset LLM models early on, then delivered a trillion-dollar valuation to Zhipu in a very short period. The sustainability of the 1,000x price-to-sales valuation bubble and the scarcity premium driven by low free float are all areas worthy of in-depth research. In addition, how companies maintain competitiveness amid extremely rapid technological iteration is an important research direction.

3. Business model innovation: Zhipu's model challenges the traditional assumption that government and enterprise customization necessarily carries high marginal costs and cannot scale. By building on a standardized base model, the company maintains a healthy industry-leading gross margin above 40%, and has validated the technology spillover effect of B-side government and enterprise projects. This opens up a new research direction for LLM business model innovation.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

智谱,成了中国AI行业迄今为止最疯狂的造富机器。

6月22日,又一个万亿公司诞生——智谱在大涨17.19%之后,市值站上了1.05万亿港元的高点。自6月12日发布GLM-5.2模型之后,智谱的股价已经翻了一倍,只用了5个交易日就涨出了一个美团、三个MINIMAX的市值。

智谱会在中国的大模型之战中独占鳌头,出乎不少人的预料。

回想不到六个月前,智谱以116.2港元登陆港交所的时候,市值仅528亿港元。这个数字放在六小龙中不算差,但也算不上惊艳,“全球大模型第一股”的光环并没有带来多强烈的共识。彼时,月之暗面靠Kimi横扫C端,MiniMax用星野在Z世代破圈,DeepSeek凭开源一鸣惊人。而智谱呢?走的是“政企定制”这种被AI四小龙证伪过的重模式。

这套模式,中国AI行业太熟悉了。商汤、旷视、依图、云从——AI四小龙当年的路,就是这样走的。结果呢?商汤IPO市值1375亿港元,如今跌到不足800亿元。云从科技上市后跌了7%。四小龙至今累计亏损超过500亿元,市值至今没有回到上市前的估值。

“智谱走了商汤的老路”,这个判断在半年前还是投资圈内相当普遍的看法。

而不到半年后的今天,同样是这家公司,市值冲破1万亿港元。从528亿到万亿,涨幅超过18倍。那个不被看好的智谱,成了中国AI行业迄今为止最疯狂的造富机器。

曾差点被低估

智谱做过C端。2023年8月它就推出了智谱清言,是国内首批通过生成式AI备案的大模型产品。但它几乎没人用,直到2025年11月,智谱清言App和网端页的月活加起来都不到300万。

智谱早期的业务重心是去拉政企客户。清华大学的底子,给了它足够的信任背书。金融能源、政务——这些对数据安全极度敏感的行业,成为智谱最早的客户来源。这让很多人觉得“不够性感、不够酷”,或者说严重一点,“不够市场化”。

而且,这条路在很多投资人看来是死路,政企定制项目的商业模式已经被AI四小龙验证过了:边际成本高、规模化难、回款周期长。每一单都是从头做到尾,做一单赚一单的钱,做完了再找下一单。这不是OpenAI那套“模型一次训练,千万次调用”的标准化生意。

从北京海淀的城市大脑,到上海浦东的智算底座;从国家电网27个省级公司的电力大模型,到中国石油覆盖勘探、生产全流程的昆仑大模型;从邮储银行数百个金融场景的逐个打磨,到青海海东融入“东数西算”的智算基地——智谱的团队几乎跑遍了半个中国,把GLM模型塞进了金融、能源、政务、石化等一个又一个行业。客户要求“数据不出内网”,智谱就跟华为合作搞昇腾一体机,训推、推理、代码生成三个型号全部适配国产芯片;企业搞不定二次开发,智谱就搞Academy培训体系手把手教。每一单都要驻场、调试、迭代,没有爆款增长曲线,没有破圈故事,只有在一个又一个行业里干苦活累活。

这就是上市前智谱的底色。

上市前的2025年,智谱本地化部署贡献了73.7%的收入——翻译成人话就是:给政企客户做定制化大模型私有化部署。一家一家谈,一个项目一个项目做,每个客户都要驻场、调试、运维。

对此,资本市场是怎么看的呢?

1月8日智谱上市,作为“全球大模型第一股”首日收盘时仅涨了13.17%,市值约555亿港元。而第二天MINIMAX上市,首日大涨了109.09%,市值一举突破了千亿港元。

彼时,谁是“小甜甜”,谁又是“牛夫人”,真是一览无遗。

SOTA模型才是硬通货

转折的起点是2026年2月12日。

这一天,智谱发布了新一代旗舰大模型GLM-5。参数从355B跃升至744B,编程能力对齐Claude Opus 4.5,在Artificial Analysis综合榜单上取得开源模型SOTA成绩。同日,智谱宣布API调用价格上调30%起。这是它在行业疯狂降价的背景下,逆势做出的第一次提价。市场用脚投票,智谱的股价当日暴涨42.72%,市值突破3200亿港元。

所谓SOTA,“State-of-the-Art”的缩写,意思是当下最强。从2025年开始,大模型之争进入了SOTA之争的阶段。顶级大模型公司们数月就要发布一款新模型,且它在发布那一刻必须是全行业最强的。如果你跟不上这个游戏节奏,那么不好意思——你立刻就会被踢出顶级玩家的队伍。就连谷歌这样的巨头也不能例外,从Gemini 1.5的辉煌,到Gemini 3的落寞,掉队来的猝不及防。

而智谱奇迹般地接连捧出了开源SOTA模型,每一次都让人刮目相看,每一次都带动了股价的暴涨。4月GLM-5.1发布,5月在Coding Agent基准中拿下开源第一,股价单日涨37%。6月13日GLM-5.2发布,综合得分51位列开源模型全球第一,股价再涨超32%。

尤其是GLM-5.2发布后,海内外的开发者社区陷入了狂热。在全球最大的开源大模型平台Hugging Face上,GLM-5.2的下载量在24小时内冲上全球趋势榜首。Reddit上的一条高赞评论写道:“终于有了一款能与Claude竞争的开源模型。”这也是全球开发者的心声。与Claude同档次的能力,却只卖四分之一的价格,GLM-5.2迅速崛起为全球开发者最常用的主流模型之一。

智谱的SOTA之路还在继续中。6月17日,马斯克在社交平台回复网友提问时表示,智谱很可能在2027年Q1赶上Claude Fable的水平。智谱首席科学家唐杰随即回复并转发:“用不了那么久。”Claude Fable是Anthropic最新发布的“传说级”模型,强到发布后几天就被美国商务部强制在美国之外下架。

就在Claude Fable下架的第二天,智谱将GLM-5.2全量开源,并高调表态:“科技不应该只属于少数人,也不应该被随时收回。”为全球用户平等提供最顶级模型的大旗,俨然由智谱扛了起来。

一个接一个的SOTA模型,直接让智谱的API收入爆了。2026年一季度,智谱的API调用价格累计上涨83%后,调用量仍同比增长400%;3月推出的Claw Plan,上线20天即突破40万订阅用户。艾瑞咨询的报告称,智谱的日均API调用次数指数居国内首位,且高频用户(日调用50次+)占比达15.9%。这些实打实的数据,彻底打破了“智谱只懂做项目”的质疑。

而在智谱股价迭创新高之时,“做政企”这件事的价值也开始被重新审视。

智谱的本地化部署,和被诟病多年的“AI四小龙”定制化项目,本质上是两回事。四小龙做的是纯项目外包,每个客户都需要从头定制,边际成本居高不下。而智谱做的是“模型驱动”的私有化部署——基座模型是标准化的,部署在不同客户的私有环境中。毛利率在2022至2024年始终保持在50%以上,2023年最高达64.6%,远超传统项目制公司。2025年因API价格战等因素,毛利率降至41%,仍处于行业较高水平。

更重要的是,大量的政企项目积累,反过来推动了模型能力的提升:极端场景数据反向优化了GLM的通用能力,40余款国产芯片的适配形成了信创领域的绝对壁垒,技术信任从政企溢出到商业市场。

6月1日,智谱公告拟申请科创板上市,计划募资150亿元,其中120亿元用于大模型研发。仅16天后,6月17日即进入辅导验收——速度之快,市场叹为观止。“A+H”双资本平台的想象空间,将股价推上新的高度。

半个公司都是千万富翁

智谱的上市,创造了中国科技投资史上最惊人的回报之一。

2019年,中科创星以约4000万元人民币投资智谱,彼时公司投后估值仅约3.75亿元。经过后续融资和股权稀释后,中科创星目前仍保留接近1.47%的股份。按当前约1万亿港元市值计算,对应股权价值接近100亿港元。

更多机构的回报同样可观。

君联资本从B轮开始连续11次加注,累计投入约7.3亿元人民币。招股书显示,其通过君联相道、君联锦帆及社保中关村创新基金合计持有智谱约6.73%股份。按当前约1万亿港元市值计算,对应持股市值约673亿港元。

启明创投在2022年B1轮领投时,ChatGPT尚未引爆全球AI热潮。其累计投入约1.5亿元人民币,目前持股约2.49%,对应市值约249亿港元。

达晨则是另一家低调的赢家。自2022年以来累计投入约1.1亿元人民币,目前持有智谱约2.19%的股份。按当前市值计算,对应持股价值约219亿港元,账面回报接近180倍。

互联网大厂同样收获丰厚。美团于B2轮投入3亿元人民币,目前持股约4.27%,对应市值约427亿港元;蚂蚁集团持股约1.87%,对应市值约187亿港元。腾讯、阿里、小米等产业资本也赚的盆满钵满。

更大的造富故事则发生在智谱内部。招股书显示,智谱的两大员工持股平台慧惠和智登分别持有 公司9.80%和6.75%的股份,合计覆盖451名员工及顾问LP。截至2025年末,智谱的员工总数是938人,也就是说接近一半的员工拥有公司股份。

而按当前市值计算,两大员工平台对应股权价值约1655亿港元,平均每名持有人对应的账面财富超过3亿港元,如此大规模的员工财富创造案例在中国是空前的。当然,由于份额分配差异巨大,核心研发人员和早期员工获得的收益远高于平均水平。

其中,慧惠持有公司9.80%股份,共有426名员工参与。按当前约1万亿港元市值计算,对应股权价值约980亿港元,人均账面价值约2.3亿港元。

另一员工持股平台智登持有公司6.75%股份,仅有25名员工及顾问参与。按当前市值计算,对应股权价值约675亿港元,人均账面价值高达27亿港元!

按当前约1万亿港元市值计算,智谱联合创始人唐杰持有的股份对应价值约666亿港元;董事长刘德兵通过直接及间接持股控制的经济权益价值约700亿港元。两位创始人的身家均已达到百亿美元级别,跻身中国AI产业最富有的创业者之列。这个始于清华实验室的故事,在资本、技术与时代浪潮的共同推动下,演变成了中国科技创业史上最具传奇色彩的财富故事之一。

当然,智谱以7.24亿元年营收支撑近万亿港元市值,超过千倍的市销率仍然令人震惊。汇丰在研究报告中指出,公司当前自由流通股比例极低,而未来随着解禁期结束,稀缺性溢价可能逐渐消退。站在万亿市值门槛上,智谱的故事才刚刚进入第二章。随着全球顶尖大模型企业陆续走向资本市场,可持续的商业模式、盈利能力以及真正的技术护城河,将成为新的试金石。

回到前面马斯克与唐杰在社交媒体上的互动。在唐杰“用不了那么久”的回复下面,马斯克继续回复道:跑分或许可以赶上,但在“真正的实用性”方面Anthropic的优势还很大。对此唐杰的回复是:“专注是唯一重要的事。”

专注二字,或许就是这场逆袭最简洁也最有力的注脚。

注:文/陶辉东,文章来源:投中网(公众号ID:China-Venture),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:投中网

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0