广告
加载中

298元一顿星星人下午茶 泡泡玛特“杀”进甜品赛道

红餐编辑部 2026-06-18 20:49
红餐编辑部 2026/06/18 20:49

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文主要介绍头部潮玩品牌泡泡玛特推出独立甜品品牌POP BAKERY,开出首家直营门店落地阿那亚,目前开业热度很高,同时分析了该模式的优势与待解决问题。

1. 核心产品与营销信息:POP BAKERY结合泡泡玛特旗下Molly、Labubu等多个热门IP开发造型甜品,产品涵盖零售甜品、现烤烘焙、饮品,新增堂食场景,开业限时推出298元星星人主题下午茶,每天限量70份,需到店取号,延续了泡泡玛特制造稀缺感的营销玩法,开业当天就排起长队,消费者认可度较高。

2. 跨界背景:泡泡玛特2025年营收超370亿元,但近四成营收来自单个IP,2026年一季度增长回落,为分散营收风险,同时用高频餐饮场景提升消费者接触IP的频率,拉动整体增长,因此选择跨界餐饮。

3. 待验证问题:目前该模式依赖IP热度,首店落地度假景区阿那亚,这套高定价玩法能否复制到普通城市的日常消费场景,还需要时间验证。

本文介绍泡泡玛特作为头部潮玩品牌跨界餐饮甜品赛道的布局,为想要跨界拓展的品牌提供了参考经验与风险提示。

1. 跨界布局逻辑:泡泡玛特原有业务存在增长依赖单个超级IP的结构风险,且潮玩属于低频消费,跨界布局高频餐饮,可以延伸IP消费触点,将IP从低频摆件变成日常可接触的体验,既优化营收结构,也能拉动品牌整体增长,这个逻辑对很多拥有成熟IP的品牌都有参考性。

2. 可借鉴的营销玩法:延续了品牌原有制造稀缺感、仪式感的思路,用限量、分时段、到店取号的玩法撬动传播热度,同时依托多IP矩阵可以持续更新产品主题,维持用户新鲜感,这个模式的获客效率很高。

3. 需要规避的失败陷阱:过往很多IP跨界餐饮折戟,核心问题是错把打卡率当复购率,IP溢价有天花板,且餐饮成本结构、运营难度远高于零售,过度依赖IP热度忽略产品品质和运营,最终都会出现热度退潮,首店的场景模型不能直接照搬复制到其他市场。

泡泡玛特跨界餐饮的尝试,给拥有IP或想切入新赛道的卖家带来了明确的机会提示、可学习经验与风险提示。

1. 新增长机会:当原有赛道增长进入瓶颈,依托自有IP势能切入高频消费赛道,是破局的可行方向,既可以延伸IP价值,也能优化营收结构,分散单一业务的风险,对于有粉丝基础的IP卖家来说,这是值得关注的新增量方向。

2. 可学习的试错方法:切入全新赛道不要直接落地重资产门店,可以先像泡泡玛特一样,用移动餐车快闪的模式在多个城市测试一年多,提前积累产品研发、供应链磨合、用户反馈的一手经验,再落地直营店,有效降低试错成本。

3. 需要注意的风险:IP跨界不能只靠流量光环,要重视产品本身和餐饮运营,餐饮的食材损耗、租金人工成本远高于零售,还需要搭建专业的品控、运营体系,同时要注意场景适配,度假景区的高定价模型不一定适合普通日常商圈,需要调整。

泡泡玛特跨界布局甜品赛道,给甜品、食品生产工厂带来了新的商业机会,也带来了数字化转型的启示。

1. 新的产品需求与商业机会:当下年轻消费者非常认可IP联名、IP造型的食品甜品,泡泡玛特的全新品牌所有产品都围绕热门IP做设计开发,且拥有十余个成熟IP,可以持续迭代SKU,对于有IP产品设计、定制化生产能力的工厂来说,这是长期稳定的新增订单来源。

2. 提前布局经验积累:泡泡玛特在落地门店前,用一年多的快闪测试打磨产品和供应链,工厂可以提前对接这类跨界品牌,参与早期的产品测试磨合,积累IP甜品的生产经验,抢占合作先机。

3. 数字化转型启示:餐饮甜品对出品标准化、新鲜度、损耗控制的要求远高于普通零售食品,工厂需要加快推进数字化生产和供应链管理,提升出品稳定性,降低生产损耗,才能匹配品牌的标准化要求,获得长期合作机会。

越来越多非餐饮品牌跨界布局餐饮,给各类餐饮服务商带来了新的行业机会,本文也明确了这类客户的核心痛点与发展方向。

1. 行业发展新趋势:拥有成熟IP和流量的零售跨界做餐饮,已经从概念测试转向落地阶段,泡泡玛特作为头部潮玩品牌开出首家独立直营店,说明这类跨界需求正在快速增长,市场空间广阔,是服务商值得开拓的新客户增量市场。

2. 跨界品牌的核心痛点:这类品牌原本做零售,缺乏餐饮的专业运营能力,搭建门店运营体系、标准化出品流程、全链条食品安全管控都需要外部支持,同时因为需要多IP快速迭代产品,对灵活的供应链和运营方案有需求,还需要针对不同场景调整门店模型。

3. 解决方案方向:服务商可以针对性打造适配跨界品牌的服务包,覆盖从早期供应链磨合、运营体系搭建、员工培训、品控管理到门店场景调试的全流程服务,满足这类新入局玩家的需求,抢占市场先机。

泡泡玛特跨界餐饮的布局,给餐饮平台、商圈平台带来了新的招商机会,也明确了平台需要调整的方向和需要规避的风险。

1. 新的招商机会:越来越多像泡泡玛特这样的非餐饮大牌IP跨界布局餐饮赛道,这类品牌自带流量和庞大粉丝基础,开业就能为平台、商圈带来大量客流,提升商圈知名度,平台商可以针对性推出专属招商方案,吸引这类优质跨界品牌入驻。

2. 平台需要适配新需求:这类跨界品牌的门店往往兼顾零售IP展示和堂食餐饮,对门店空间规划、客流管控都有特殊要求,比如泡泡玛特的首店就分出手办区和餐饮区,还需要限量取号的客流管理,平台商可以针对性开发适配的运营管理工具,为品牌提供支持。

3. 需要规避的经营风险:这类IP餐饮目前高度依赖IP热度,产品力和运营稳定性还待验证,平台引入这类品牌时,可以帮忙对接专业餐饮运营资源,降低品牌翻船风险,同时也要关注IP热度波动对门店经营的影响,提前做好门店调整的预案,避免长期空置损失。

泡泡玛特跨界布局甜品品牌,是潮玩行业破增长瓶颈的全新尝试,是非常典型的研究样本,有很多值得研究的新动向和新问题。

1. 产业发展新动向:国内潮玩行业经过高速增长后,头部企业已经显现出单个IP依赖度高、增长放缓、消费频次低的发展痛点,头部品牌开始通过跨界高频消费场景,延伸IP价值,优化营收结构,这是潮玩行业发展到新阶段的标志性新动向。

2. 新商业模式探索:本次泡泡玛特探索的“多IP矩阵+先快闪测试后落地门店+低频潮玩+高频餐饮”模式,通过餐饮场景提升消费者接触IP的频率,将IP价值从零售延伸到体验,是IP商业化的全新商业模式尝试,具备很高的研究价值。

3. 待研究的新问题:该模式目前还有很多待验证的问题,包括IP餐饮的溢价天花板、跨界企业餐饮运营能力的搭建、不同场景下的模型适配性等,后续可以跟踪其发展,研究该模式的可持续性,为整个零售IP跨界行业提供研究参考。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article introduces that Pop Mart, China's leading designer toy brand, has launched POP BAKERY, an independent dessert brand that opened its first directly operated store in Aranya. The new store has seen strong initial popularity, and this article analyzes the advantages of this new venture and unresolved challenges ahead.

1. Core products and marketing: POP BAKERY develops shaped desserts featuring Pop Mart's popular IPs including Molly and Labubu, with a product portfolio covering packaged desserts, fresh-baked pastries and beverages. The new store adds an in-dining dining experience, and launched a limited-time 298 yuan Star Guy themed afternoon tea with only 70 servings available daily via in-store queuing for pickup. This延续了Pop Mart's signature strategy of manufacturing scarcity, and drew long lines on opening day, indicating strong initial consumer acceptance.

2. Rationale for the cross-industry move: Pop Mart targets over 37 billion yuan in revenue in 2025, but nearly 40% of its revenue comes from a single IP, and its growth slowed in the first quarter of 2026. To diversify revenue risk and increase consumer touchpoints with its IPs via the high-frequency dining scenario to drive overall growth, the company chose to enter the food and beverage sector.

3. Unproven questions to answer: The current model relies heavily on existing IP heat. As the first store is located in the resort destination Aranya, it remains to be seen whether this premium pricing strategy can be replicated for everyday consumption scenarios in mainstream cities.

This article analyzes Pop Mart, a leading designer toy brand, entering the dessert and F&B sector as a cross-industry expansion, offering reference insights and risk warnings for brands planning similar expansion.

1. Rationale for cross-industry expansion: Pop Mart's original business faces structural risk from over-reliance on a single super IP, and designer toys are inherently a low-frequency consumption category. Entering the high-frequency F&B sector extends IP consumer touchpoints, turning IPs from low-frequency collectibles into a daily-accessible experience, which both optimizes revenue structure and drives overall brand growth. This logic is highly referential for many brands with established IPs.

2. Replicable marketing tactics: Pop Mart延续了 its core strategy of building scarcity and ritual, driving buzz through limited stock, time-blocked access and in-store queuing pickup. Its multi-IP portfolio also allows continuous product theme updates to sustain user engagement, delivering high customer acquisition efficiency for this model.

3. Pitfalls to avoid: Many past IP cross-over F&B ventures failed because brands mistakenly treated one-off visit traffic as repeat purchase potential. IP premiums have a clear ceiling, and F&B has a far more challenging cost structure and operational complexity than retail. Over-reliance on IP heat at the expense of product quality and operations will inevitably lead to a fade in popularity, and the initial store's scenario model cannot be directly copied to other markets.

Pop Mart's foray into F&B delivers clear opportunity signals, actionable lessons and risk warnings for sellers with existing IPs or those looking to enter new sectors.

1. A new path for growth: When growth stalls in your core sector, leveraging existing IP momentum to enter a high-frequency consumption category is a viable way to break through. This extends IP value, optimizes revenue structure and diversifies risk from over-reliance on a single business, making it an attractive new growth avenue for IP-based sellers with an existing fan base.

2. A low-risk trial-and-error approach to learn from: Instead of opening capital-heavy brick-and-mortar stores immediately when entering a new sector, brands can follow Pop Mart's example: test the concept via food truck pop-ups across multiple cities for more than a year, accumulate first-hand experience in product development, supply chain alignment and user feedback before opening a permanent direct store, effectively cutting trial-and-error costs.

3. Key risks to watch: IP cross-over ventures cannot rely on traffic buzz alone. Brands must prioritize product quality and F&B operations. F&B faces far higher costs for food waste, rent and labor than retail, and requires building a dedicated quality control and operational system. Brands must also note scenario fit: the premium pricing model that works for resort destinations may not adapt to regular commercial districts, and requires adjustments.

Pop Mart's entry into the dessert sector creates new business opportunities for dessert and food manufacturers, and offers insights for digital transformation.

1. New product demand and business opportunities: Young consumers today are highly receptive to IP-collaborated, IP-shaped food and desserts. All products under Pop Mart's new brand are designed around its popular IPs, and the company owns more than 10 established IPs that enable continuous SKU iteration. For factories capable of IP product design and customized production, this represents a long-term, stable source of incremental orders.

2. Prepare early to gain first-mover advantage: Pop Mart tested and refined its products and supply chain via more than a year of pop-ups before opening its permanent store. Manufacturers can proactively partner with these cross-industry brands, participate in early product testing and alignment, build experience in IP dessert production, and lock in early cooperative advantages.

3. Insights for digital transformation: Dessert and F&B have far higher requirements for output standardization, freshness and waste control than standard packaged retail food. Manufacturers need to accelerate digital transformation for production and supply chain management to improve output consistency and reduce production waste, so they can meet the standardized requirements of brands and secure long-term cooperation.

A growing number of non-F&B brands are entering the food sector, creating new industry opportunities for all types of F&B service providers. This article outlines core pain points of these new clients and directions for growth.

1. A new growing industry trend: Cross-industry F&B entry by retail brands with established IPs and existing traffic has moved from concept testing to full-scale launch. Pop Mart, a leading designer toy brand opening its first independent direct F&B store, signals that cross-industry demand is growing rapidly, with broad market space, making this a high-potential incremental customer segment for service providers to expand into.

2. Core pain points of cross-industry brands: These brands come from a retail background and lack professional F&B operational capabilities. They need external support to build store operation systems, standardize output processes and implement end-to-end food safety control. They also require flexible supply chain and operational solutions to support rapid product iteration across multiple IPs, and need to adapt store models for different scenarios.

3. Direction for solution development: Service providers can build customized service packages tailored for cross-industry brands, covering the full process from early supply chain alignment, operational system setup, staff training and quality control to store scenario adjustment. This meets the needs of these new entrants and allows providers to capture first-mover market share.

Pop Mart's entry into F&B brings new investment attraction opportunities for catering platforms and commercial property platforms, and clarifies adjustments platforms need to make and risks to avoid.

1. New leasing and attraction opportunities: More and more big non-F&B brands with established IPs like Pop Mart are entering the F&B sector. These brands bring built-in traffic and a large existing fan base, can drive strong footfall for platforms and commercial districts, and boost district brand awareness. Platforms can develop customized attraction packages to draw these high-quality cross-industry brands to locate with them.

2. Adapt platform offerings to new requirements: Stores from these cross-industry brands typically combine IP retail display and in-dining F&B, and have special requirements for space planning and footfall management. For example, Pop Mart's first store has separate zones for collectibles and dining, and requires limited queuing management for its limited products. Platforms can develop tailored operational management tools to support these brands.

3. Operational risks to avoid: IP-led F&B currently relies heavily on IP heat, and product strength and operational stability remain unproven. When onboarding these brands, platforms can help connect them with professional F&B operational resources to reduce the risk of failure. They should also monitor the impact of IP popularity fluctuations on store performance, and prepare adjustment plans in advance to avoid long-term vacancy losses.

Pop Mart's launch of an independent dessert brand is a new attempt by the designer toy industry to break through growth bottlenecks, serving as a highly representative research sample with many notable new trends and open research questions.

1. New industry development trends: After a period of rapid growth, China's designer toy industry now faces clear pain points at the leading firm level, including over-reliance on single IPs, slowing growth and inherently low consumption frequency. Leading brands have begun to extend IP value and optimize revenue structure by entering high-frequency consumption scenarios, which is a defining new trend for the industry's new stage of development.

2. Exploration of a new business model: The "multi-IP portfolio + pop-up testing before permanent store launch + low-frequency designer toys + high-frequency F&B" model Pop Mart is testing increases consumer IP exposure via F&B scenarios and extends IP value from retail to experiential consumption. This is an entirely new business model experiment for IP commercialization, with high research value.

3. Open questions for future research: Many questions about this model remain unproven, including the ceiling for IP-led F&B premiums, how cross-industry incumbents build F&B operational capabilities, and model adaptability across different consumption scenarios. Future tracking of this venture can research the model's long-term sustainability, providing research references for the entire IP retail cross-industry sector.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

年收入数百亿的潮玩帝国,要来抢餐饮市场的“蛋糕”了?

本文由红餐网(ID:hongcan18)原创首发,作者:周沫;编辑:倩君。

今天(6月17日),POP BAKERY阿那亚店试营业第一天,早上9点,门店还没开门,现场已经蜿蜒出排队长龙,第一批赶来的粉丝迫不及待尝鲜。

这是泡泡玛特(POP MART)旗下首家甜品直营店。不少粉丝天刚亮就前往门店拍照打卡,也有网友在社交平台上“蹲守”,并在POP BAKERY阿那亚店的帖子下急切询问:“曲奇能不能代购?”“盲盒种类多吗?”

作为泡泡玛特旗下独立甜品品牌,POP BAKERY于2025年正式推出。品牌将泡泡玛特旗下的人气IP,如Molly、Labubu、Dimoo、Skullpanda等,与甜品深度结合,推出了IP造型的冰淇淋、黄油曲奇、巧克力等产品。此前,POP BAKERY已在北京、青岛、成都等20余家城市开出了移动餐车快闪店。

如今从快闪到独立门店的落地,排队抢盲盒的年轻人,会不会为“能吃”的IP持续买账?这一模式又能否在甜品赛道真正跑通?

下午茶298元一套!泡泡玛特下场开甜品店

走进阿那亚,POP BAKERY的店面和周边的建筑相比尤其出挑。整个外立面采用浅灰色的流线型设计,像层层堆叠的波浪,打破了传统店铺方正、规矩的轮廓感。

门店墙面、门口、屋顶……随处可见的星星人元素,配合高饱和度的黄色椭圆形休息座椅,让人一眼就认出这是泡泡玛特的“地盘”。

店内分为两个独立区域。一个是手办区,主要陈列泡泡玛特的盲盒产品;另一个是餐饮区,也是这家直营店区别于其他泡泡玛特门店和快闪餐车的核心所在。

与快闪店“即买即走”的轻量模式不同,阿那亚店不仅保留了冰淇淋、曲奇饼、巧克力等零售产品,更首次增设了堂食就餐区,将消费体验从“随手买一个”升级为“坐下来享用”,实现了从零售到堂食的场景延伸。

从产品矩阵看,甜品是POP BAKERY的基本盘。冰淇淋产品包含星星人造型的“星冰莓双棒冰淇淋”“星冰芒牛乳冰淇淋”,CRYBABY造型的提拉米苏口味冰淇淋,以及SKULLPANDA巧克力橙子口味雪糕等多款产品。

其中“星冰莓双棒”为阿那亚限定款,零售价在28至38元之间。蛋糕同样以星星人、LABUBU等IP为设计元素,定价在48至199元不等。

现烤烘焙是这一直营店新增的产品线。

目前主推铜锣烧和面包系列,铜锣烧包含茉莉生巧、奥奥芝士等多种口味,定价25元一个;面包系列则包含用爆米花、肉松等做成的“爆炸头”纸杯蛋糕、夹心可颂、蛋挞等,为门店增添了更多甜咸搭配的选择。

饮品也是直营店的另一大新增板块,共推出约16款产品,分为咖啡、特调和非咖啡三大系列。既有美式、拿铁等经典款咖啡,也有多款特调饮品,其中包含一款含酒精的特调。

非咖啡系列有四款,比如柚见星星人、马来西亚的苹果等。饮品单价集中在28-38元之间,与冰淇淋定价处于同一区间。

作为开业期间的亮点,门店限时推出了星星人主题下午茶,定价298元/套,包含小狗慕斯、芭菲、巧克力、泡芙、果茶等产品。

这一下午茶套餐的供应时间为6月20日至7月20日,每天限量70份,且只能到店取号。开放时间段从10点30分到20点30分,每桌限2人,多人同行需分桌坐。

限量、分时段、到店取号,这套玩法,与泡泡玛特擅长营造的“稀缺感”和“仪式感”相契合,而消费者对此也相当买账:开业当天排起的长龙、社交平台上源源不断的“求代购”帖子,都在印证着这套打法在现阶段颇有成效。

从快闪到实体门店,泡泡玛特这一步迈得并不小。但更值得追问的是:它为何偏偏选在这个时候,将手伸至餐饮行业?

翻看2025年的财报,泡泡玛特全年营收371.2亿元,增长184.7%,成绩相当亮眼。但细看结构,仅LABUBU一个IP就贡献了141.6亿,占比近四成。到了2026年一季度,增长回落至75%-80%区间。

公司管理层也在业绩会上坦言:去年公司凭借流量实现了超高速增长,然而今年在没有额外流量加持的情况下,需要各个团队的共同努力。

这话背后的潜台词是:当一个超级IP撑起了近四成的营收,公司的增长就像是在走钢丝。 哪怕这个IP现在依然火爆,但如果把未来单押在这一爆款上,不是明智的选择。此外,如何让消费者更高频地进店消费,也是未来进一步拉动增长的关键。

在此背景下,跨界开甜品店成为一个颇为合适的增长选项——用餐饮这种更高频的消费场景,把IP从“偶尔被买回家的摆件”,变成“日常生活里可以反复接触的体验”。

手握大IP,能做好甜品生意吗?

拿着IP做餐饮,天然的优势摆在那里:品牌势能强,粉丝基数大。但盲区同样不少,市场上不乏大热IP跨界餐饮最终折戟的案例。

Line Friends咖啡馆、熊本熊咖啡馆,都曾红极一时,后来慢慢淡出大众视野。类似案例,不胜枚举。它们踩过的坑,主要可以归为几类。

1.把打卡率当复购率,IP溢价有天花板

很多零售巨头或者大IP下场做餐饮,往往是“开业即巅峰”。第一波客流靠粉丝和猎奇者撑起,看起来热闹。但餐饮的终极考验从来不是一次性打卡,而是复购率。

IP是很好的“开场白”,能吸引人第一次走进来。但如果产品本身不够硬,消费者来一次拍了照、打了卡,就等于“拔草成功”,不会再为了同一个“IP脸”反复消费。

复购率上不去,再高的首日客流也只是昙花一现。

以十多年前大热的熊本熊咖啡馆为例,试营业期一过,热度就开始衰减……有相当数量的消费者说,“试过一次后发现总体性价比略低,排队不值当,就算是拔过草了。”

2.成本结构不同,运营难度相对更高

用IP做生意,售卖的产品毛利率普遍更高,且成本结构相对可控。但餐饮是另一套逻辑,毛利率下降,还得额外承担食材损耗、冷链物流、高租金、高人工等成本。很多跨界者试图用IP的“光环”来填平这个差额,却忽略了消费者愿不愿意为这份“光环”持续买单。

而且,餐饮运营没有捷径可走。食品安全、后厨SOP、员工培训、损耗控制……每一项都是需要时间和专业度去打磨的能力,不是光有钱、有品牌就能凭空长出来的。

搭建一套成熟的门店运营体系,建立标准化的出品流程,完成食品安全的全链条管控,都需要相当长一段时间的磨合期。

在这个窗口期内,任何一次食品安全翻车,或者出品不稳定,都可能迅速击穿消费者靠“IP好感”建立起来的信任。而信任一旦碎了,想再捡起来,就难了。

但这次,泡泡玛特也并非“裸奔”入局。

在开出独立门店之前,它已经以移动餐车快闪的形式,在全国20多座城市跑了一年多。这不仅是品牌曝光和粉丝触达的过程,更是一次实打实的“预习”,从产品研发、供应链磨合到消费反馈,都在快闪阶段积累了一手经验。这对于一家跨界入局者而言,是相当宝贵的先发优势。

其次,泡泡玛特旗下并非只有LABUBU一个IP。Molly、Dimoo、Skullpanda等十余个年营收过亿的IP构成了一个矩阵,这为POP BAKERY提供了持续迭代产品、轮换主题的可能。即便某个IP的热度出现波动,门店仍有足够的IP储备来维持新鲜感。这也是泡泡玛特最核心且难以复制的优势。

不过,餐饮这条路上,没有谁能永远“躺赢”。

POP BAKERY最大的资产是IP的“话题度”,但最大的风险也藏在里面,如果过度依赖这份热度,忽视了产品本身的口碑,那“打卡狂欢”迟早会退潮。

还有一个更现实的问题:首店选在阿那亚。这里的客群不是匆匆路过买面包,而是为度假和情绪价值而来的游客,他们愿意为一支18块的棒棒糖、一盒168元的曲奇买单。但如果把这套模型搬到其他城市,面对赶时间、比价格的日常消费者,是否还能跑得通呢?

眼下,泡泡玛特不缺流量,也不缺IP运营的成熟经验,但“餐饮”这条赛道,远比“拆盲盒”复杂得多。

泡泡玛特的这些IP能否将一时的排队热度,真正转化为一家烘焙甜品店的长期生命力?这个甜品品牌,又是否能够真正成为消费者更高频接触IP的入口?POP BAKERY迈出下一步前,仍有不少问题需要回答。

注:文/红餐编辑部,文章来源:红餐网(公众号ID:hongcan18),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:红餐网

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0