广告
加载中

养殖户哭穷、消费者喊贵 鸡蛋涨价的利润“人间蒸发”了?

专注餐饮供应链的 2026-06-18 20:41
专注餐饮供应链的 2026/06/18 20:41

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

总:本文梳理了本轮国内鸡蛋涨价的整体情况,拆解了涨价原因,还给普通消费者提供了清晰的消费参考。

1. 涨价现状:本轮涨价并非终端临时加价,而是上游产地基准价的整体抬升,不同渠道涨幅明显,终端家庭采购30枚装鸡蛋从约21元涨到27元,单枚涨幅约29%,规模采购的涨幅更高,最高接近38%,涨价已经传导到全产业链各环节。

2. 涨价核心原因:主要是蛋鸡周期导致的供给缺口,去年行业全年深度亏损,养殖户大量淘汰蛋鸡、降低补栏意愿,而蛋鸡补栏后需要100多天才能产蛋,产能无法快速恢复;叠加高温降低产蛋率,端午、中秋提前备货放大缺口,共同推动价格上涨。

3. 消费参考:本次涨价后,普通鲜蛋和品牌蛋、即食蛋的价差被压缩,品牌蛋品质更稳定,破损率更低,同等预算下选择品牌蛋的相对性价比更高,更划算。

总:本轮鸡蛋涨价周期为蛋品品牌商展现了新的消费趋势,也提供了可借鉴的品牌运营经验。

1. 市场与消费变化:涨价周期内,下游客户和消费者的价格敏感度阶段性下降,更看重供货稳定性、品质安全保障,更倾向选择品牌化企业合作;普通鲜蛋涨价后,可生食、即食品牌蛋和普通鲜蛋的价差压缩,相对性价比提升,咨询合作的客户明显增加,品牌蛋获得了更大的市场拓展机会。

2. 头部品牌的成功经验:以黄天鹅为代表的头部品牌蛋企,采用全产业链布局模式,从种鸡、饲料到养殖、加工全链路管控,自有基地+深度协同养殖体系,能平抑原料成本波动,不会因为短期行情打乱价格体系,有效维护了客户粘性和品牌稳定性。

3. 未来趋势:行业会进一步向品牌化、规模化集中,每一轮周期波动都会提升头部品牌的市场份额,坚持长期品牌建设和供应链升级的企业会获得更多竞争优势。

总:本轮鸡蛋涨价周期给蛋品经销商、零售卖家带来了多方面的影响,也给出了明确的机会提示和风险提示。

1. 当前需要注意的风险:本次涨价是上游产地基准价整体抬升,鲜蛋流通端库存周期通常只有两三天,没有足够的低价库存缓冲涨价压力,上游拿货成本上涨后,单箱货值变高,资金占用明显增大,同时涨价会压缩客户采购量,整体销量有所收缩,多数渠道商利润空间不增反降,需要重点关注现金流风险。

2. 需求变化带来的增长机会:涨价后下游客户更倾向选择品质稳定的品牌蛋,可生食、即食蛋的相对性价比提升,需求量反而出现上涨,卖家可以抓住机会调整品类结构,增加品牌蛋、即食蛋的布局。

3. 应对建议:可以和头部全产业链品牌蛋企签订长期合作协议,锁定产能和价格,降低周期波动带来的成本风险,同时满足客户对品质和供应稳定性的需求。

总:本轮鸡蛋涨价周期暴露了中小生产主体的抗风险弱点,也给蛋品养殖、加工工厂指明了转型方向和商业机会。

1. 生产端需求变化:当前下游客户对蛋品的核心需求已经从低价转向稳定供应、品质安全,更愿意和有全产业链布局的工厂深度合作,过去依赖周期波动赚快钱的粗放式经营已经难以为继,中小工厂需要尽快调整生产策略。

2. 可把握的商业机会:涨价后普通鲜蛋价格上行,品牌蛋、即食加工蛋的相对性价比提升,下游客户咨询和采购量明显增加,给布局品牌鲜蛋、即食加工蛋的生产工厂带来了明确的增长空间。

3. 转型启示:行业未来规模化、品牌化是明确趋势,工厂可以通过自建产能或者深度协同打造全产业链体系,平抑周期波动带来的成本和供应风险,保持均衡的产能节奏,避免跟风集中淘汰、集中补栏放大自身经营波动,提升抗周期能力。

总:本轮鸡蛋价格周期波动清晰展现了当前蛋品行业各环节玩家的核心痛点,也给服务商指明了行业发展趋势和服务方向。

1. 行业发展趋势:鸡蛋行业正在从过去分散的中小散户经营,逐步向规模化、品牌化、全产业链方向转型,不同企业的抗周期能力分层会越来越明显,未来头部品牌企业的市场占比会持续提升,行业整体升级空间大。

2. 不同客户的核心痛点:中小养殖和流通企业没有全产业链布局,无法平抑成本和供应波动,很容易受周期冲击出现亏损;加工企业普遍采用给客户全年锁价的模式,原料涨价后成本上涨只能内部消化,利润被严重挤压;流通商在涨价周期面临资金占用大、利润空间被压缩的问题。

3. 服务机会:服务商可以针对不同玩家的痛点,推出产能规划咨询、供应链金融服务、全产业链管控方案、品牌建设运营服务等产品,既帮助中小玩家提升抗周期能力,也满足头部企业的升级需求,抓住行业转型的红利。

总:本轮鸡蛋涨价周期暴露了当前蛋品行业商家的核心需求,也给蛋品相关平台的运营、招商和风险管控指明了方向。

1. 商家对平台的核心需求:中小商家难以应对蛋品周期波动,希望平台能对接稳定的品牌产能,帮助管控成本和供应风险;品牌商家希望平台对接更多B端餐饮和C端零售客户,拓展自身销售渠道,双方都需要平台提供长期稳定的对接机制。

2. 平台运营与招商调整方向:可以抓住本轮涨价后下游客户转向品牌蛋的机会,加大对头部全产业链蛋企、品牌蛋企的招商引入,丰富平台的品牌蛋品类,满足下游客户对品质和供应稳定性的需求。

3. 风险规避建议:平台需要及时提醒商家注意蛋品周期波动风险,不要盲目跟风囤货,根据行业判断后续价格有回落空间;同时可以推出长期供货对接服务,帮助买卖双方签订长期协议,锁定价格和产能,降低周期波动对双方经营的影响。

总:本轮鸡蛋涨价是行业周期波动的典型案例,展现了国内蛋品产业的新动向和新问题,对农业产业化研究有较多启示。

1. 产业新动向:当前国内蛋品行业正在经历从分散散户经营向规模化、品牌化、全产业链转型的关键阶段,企业抗周期能力的分层已经显现,头部品牌企业凭借全产业链布局,能够平抑短期价格波动,在周期波动中反而能获得更多客户认可,持续提升市场份额。

2. 产业现存问题:中小生产主体占比仍然较高,从业者容易跟风淘汰补栏,这种行为会进一步放大行业周期波动;流通端缺乏足够的缓冲库存,价格传导速度快,本轮涨价中中小B端受到的伤害远大于终端;加工企业采用锁价模式的情况下,原料价格波动的风险缺乏有效的对冲方式。

3. 商业模式研究启示:全产业链一体化的品牌化商业模式,比传统分散的现货交易模式抗风险能力更强,更能适应农产品的周期属性,未来会成为蛋品行业的主流发展方向,行业整体需要通过规模化、标准化平抑周期波动,减少价格大起大落。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines the ongoing egg price hike in China, analyzes its root causes, and offers clear consumption guidance for everyday consumers.

1. Current state of the price increase: This round of price gains is not caused by temporary markup at the retail end, but rather an overall rise in base prices at upstream producing regions. Price increases are significant across all sales channels. The retail price of a 30-egg pack for household consumers has risen from around 21 yuan to 27 yuan, a 29% increase per egg. Bulk purchases have seen even larger gains, with the maximum increase approaching 38%. The price increase has propagated through every link of the entire industrial chain.

2. Core drivers of the price increase: The primary cause is a supply gap driven by the layer chicken industry cycle. The industry suffered deep full-year losses in 2023, leading farmers to cull large numbers of layer chickens and sharply reduce restocking intentions. Since it takes more than 100 days from restocking to new egg production, capacity cannot recover quickly. This supply gap has been compounded by high summer temperatures that reduce laying rates, and提前备货 for the Dragon Boat and Mid-Autumn festivals that further expands the gap, all combining to push prices up.

3. Consumption guidance: After this price increase, the price gap between regular fresh eggs, branded eggs and ready-to-eat eggs has narrowed. Branded eggs offer more consistent quality and lower breakage rates, so they deliver better relative value and are a more cost-effective choice for consumers with the same budget.

This round of egg price volatility has revealed new consumer trends and offers valuable branding and operation lessons for egg product brands.

1. Shifts in the market and consumer behavior: During the price hike cycle, downstream clients and consumers have seen a temporary drop in price sensitivity, and now prioritize supply stability and food quality and safety, and are more inclined to partner with branded enterprises. After regular fresh eggs rose in price, the price gap between regular fresh eggs and premium branded options such as pasteurized ready-to-eat eggs narrowed, boosting their relative value. Inquiries and partnership requests from clients have increased notably, giving branded eggs greater room for market expansion.

2. Successful lessons from leading brands: Top branded egg producers represented by Huang Tian E (Yellow Swan) have adopted a full-industry-chain layout, with end-to-end control covering breeding stock, feed, farming and processing. Their system of owned production bases plus deep collaborative farming partnerships absorbs raw material cost fluctuations, allowing them to avoid disrupting their pricing systems amid short-term market volatility, and effectively maintain client loyalty and brand stability.

3. Future industry outlook: The industry will continue to consolidate toward branded, large-scale operations. Every cycle of price volatility expands the market share of leading brands, and enterprises that stick to long-term brand building and supply chain upgrading will gain greater competitive advantages.

This round of egg price increases has brought multi-faceted impacts for egg distributors and retail sellers, along with clear opportunity and risk alerts.

1. Key risks to note: This price increase reflects an overall rise in base prices at upstream producing regions. Fresh eggs typically only have an inventory cycle of 2-3 days in the distribution link, leaving no low-cost inventory buffer to absorb price pressures. After upstream purchase costs rose, the value per container has increased, pushing up capital占用 significantly. At the same time, higher prices have reduced order sizes from clients, leading to an overall contraction in sales volume. For most distributors, profit margins have shrunk rather than grown, so cash flow risk requires close attention.

2. Growth opportunities from shifting demand: After the price hike, downstream clients increasingly prefer consistently high-quality branded eggs. The improved relative value of pasteurized and ready-to-eat eggs has actually driven up demand, creating an opportunity for sellers to adjust their product mix by expanding assortments of branded and ready-to-eat egg products.

3. Recommendations for coping with volatility: Sellers can sign long-term cooperation agreements with leading full-industry-chain branded egg producers to lock in production capacity and pricing, reduce cost risks from industry cycles, and simultaneously meet client demand for consistent quality and supply stability.

This round of egg price volatility has exposed the weak anti-risk capabilities of small and medium-sized producers, and points out clear transformation directions and business opportunities for egg farming and processing factories.

1. Shifting demand on the production end: Downstream clients' core demand for egg products has shifted from low pricing to stable supply and quality and safety. They now prefer to partner deeply with factories with full-industry-chain layouts. The old rough-and-tumble business model of profiting from short-term cycle swings is no longer viable, and small and medium-sized factories need to adjust their production strategies as soon as possible.

2. Actionable business opportunities: As regular fresh egg prices rise, the relative value of branded eggs and processed ready-to-eat eggs has improved, leading to clear increases in client inquiries and order volumes. This creates distinct growth room for producers that have already laid out branded fresh eggs and ready-to-eat processed egg products.

3. Key takeaways for transformation: Large-scale, branded operations are the clear future trend for the industry. Factories can build full-industry-chain systems either through self-constructed capacity or deep collaborative partnerships to absorb cost and supply risks from industry cycles, maintain a steady capacity rhythm, avoid amplifying operational volatility by following the herd on mass culls and restocking, and improve their ability to withstand industry cycles.

This round of egg price cycle volatility clearly outlines the core pain points of players across all links of China's egg industry, and points out industry development trends and service directions for industry service providers.

1. Industry development trends: The Chinese egg industry is gradually transitioning from a fragmented structure dominated by small-scale independent farmers to large-scale, branded, full-industry-chain operations. The gap in anti-cycle capabilities between different enterprises will continue to widen. The market share of leading branded enterprises will keep rising, and the industry as a whole has substantial room for upgrading.

2. Core pain points of different client groups: Small and medium-sized farming and distribution enterprises lack full-industry-chain layouts, so they cannot smooth out cost and supply volatility, and are highly vulnerable to losses from industry cycles. Most processing enterprises operate on annual fixed-price contracts with clients, so they have to absorb higher raw material costs entirely on their own when prices rise, leading to severe profit compression. Distributors face the dual pressures of increased capital占用 and shrinking profit margins during price hike cycles.

3. New service opportunities: Service providers can develop customized solutions targeting the pain points of different players, including capacity planning consulting, supply chain financial services, full-industry-chain management systems, and brand building and operation services. These offerings can help small and medium-sized players improve their anti-cycle capabilities, while also meeting the upgrading needs of leading enterprises, allowing service providers to capture dividends from the industry's transformation.

This round of egg price volatility has exposed the core needs of merchants in China's egg industry, and outlines clear directions for operation, merchant recruitment and risk management for egg-related marketplaces and platforms.

1. Core needs of merchants from platforms: Small and medium-sized merchants struggle to cope with egg industry cycle volatility, and hope platforms can connect them with stable branded production capacity to help manage cost and supply risks. Branded merchants hope platforms can connect them with more B-side catering clients and C-end retail consumers to expand their sales channels. Both groups need platforms to provide long-term stable matching mechanisms.

2. Adjustment directions for platform operation and merchant recruitment: Platforms can capitalize on the post-hike shift in downstream client demand toward branded eggs by stepping up recruitment of leading full-industry-chain and branded egg producers, enriching the platform's assortment of branded egg products to meet downstream demand for quality and supply stability.

3. Risk mitigation recommendations: Platforms should proactively remind merchants of the risks of egg industry cycle volatility, and warn against blindly following the herd to hoard inventory. Industry analysis indicates there is room for prices to decline in the future. Platforms can also launch long-term supply matching services to help buyers and sellers sign long-term agreements that lock in prices and capacity, reducing the impact of cycle volatility on the operations of both parties.

This round of egg price increases is a typical case of industry cycle volatility, which reveals new trends and emerging problems in China's egg industry, and offers multiple important insights for agricultural industrialization research.

1. New industrial trends: China's egg industry is currently in a critical transition period from fragmented smallholder operations to large-scale, branded, full-industry-chain operations. A clear divide in anti-cycle capabilities across enterprises has already emerged. Leading branded enterprises, relying on their full-industry-chain layouts, can absorb short-term price volatility, gain greater customer recognition during market swings, and continuously expand their market share.

2. Existing industrial problems: Small and medium-sized producers still account for a large share of the industry, and producers often follow the herd on culling and restocking, a behavior that further amplifies industry cycle volatility. The distribution link lacks sufficient buffer inventory, leading to very fast price transmission, and small and medium-sized B-side players suffered far more harm in this round of price increases than end consumers. For processing enterprises operating on fixed-price contracts, there is still a lack of effective hedging tools for raw material price volatility risk.

3. Insights for business model research: The integrated full-industry-chain branded business model has stronger anti-risk capabilities than the traditional fragmented spot trading model, and is better suited to the cyclical nature of agricultural products. It will become the mainstream development direction for the egg industry in the future. The industry as a whole needs to smooth out cycle volatility through large-scale operations and standardization to reduce extreme price swings.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

鸡蛋,也走到了周期拐点。

本文由红餐供应链指南原创

作者:郭佳哿;编辑:景雪

5月CPI里,鸡蛋是少数被单独点名的食品涨价项。

国家统计局数据显示,5月鸡蛋价格上涨6.1%,影响CPI环比上涨约0.03个百分点。农业农村部数据则显示,5月以来,鸡蛋价格已经连续5周上涨;截至6月9日14时,全国农产品批发市场每公斤鸡蛋平均价格为10.85元,比前一天上涨2.3%。

这轮涨价很快被终端感知。不少消费者和渠道商都提到,鸡蛋采购价格已经明显上移。

涨价带来的结果,也开始沿着产业链分化。

同一轮涨价,传导速度已经分化

一板鸡蛋贵了几块钱,最近在菜市场和社交平台都不难听到这些声音。

“近来每天都在涨”,有消费者告诉红餐供应链指南,常买的30枚装鸡蛋已经从20元出头涨到接近30元。另一位消费者则提到,购买的整箱鸡蛋,一般为360颗(12板/箱),此前约165-175元,如今涨至225-245元。

也有烘焙店老板向红餐供应链指南表示,自己平时半箱半箱拿货,210枚鸡蛋最近从110元涨到了150元,早前低位时还拿过90多元。

把数据拆开来看,家庭采购30枚装鸡蛋从21元涨到27元,即单枚价格从0.70元涨到0.90元,涨幅约29%;

而规模采购里,整箱购买的消费者的数据,取中位数,单枚价格约从0.47元涨到约0.65元,涨幅约38%。

烘焙店单枚价格约从0.52元涨到0.71元,涨幅约36.4%。

这些样本的规格、渠道未必完全一致,不能直接推成全国价格。但放到单枚鸡蛋口径下看,它们指出一个现象:

大多数情况下,如果只是终端商家临时加价,规模采购通常能靠批量折扣、长期合作、议价能力把涨幅压低。但这轮鸡蛋价格上涨已经进入了批发和采购体系,说明上涨大概率已经发生在更前端的产地价,是上游基准价的抬升。

一些小B原本享受的是更低的基础价格,涨价发生后,原有价格优势被压缩了,涨幅反而更大。

简单来说,鸡蛋这种强现货属性的农产品,在供应偏紧时,批量采购未必能换来更强议价权。这轮周期性价格上涨对B端是伤害更大的。

做鲜蛋供应链的佛山蛋仓,其董事长区芳霞告诉红餐供应链指南,他们是养殖场直接采购,自二三月份以来,一箱360枚装鸡蛋的价格上涨约100元,涨幅大概在三成左右。B端价格已经基本跟着行情调整,零售端前期还能消化一部分涨幅,目前涨幅约20%。

鲜蛋的流通渠道留不出太厚的缓冲层。区芳霞提到,鲜蛋日常库存周期通常只有两三天,量大的时候每天直采、每天发货。价格上涨时,渠道商手里没有足够低价库存慢慢消化;价格回落时,库存又会影响出货价格。

但有意思的是,不是所有鸡蛋都在涨。可生食鸡蛋、即食鸡蛋以及部分头部品牌的鲜鸡蛋并没有完全按照市场节奏同步调价。这部分品牌蛋企业由于建立了更完整的产业链,受现货价格波动的影响相对有限。

以黄天鹅为例,其可生食鸡蛋业务长期强调自有养殖和全产业链管理,鸡蛋供应更多来自自有体系。红餐供应链指南了解到,近期鸡蛋市场价格上涨,并未明显影响黄天鹅的终端销售价格,其终端价格基本没有变化。

凤集食品集团副总裁田敏告诉红餐供应链指南,去年行业确实很难,但黄天鹅服务的客户群体相对稳定,因此没有因为短期行情波动打乱自己的节奏,产能规划更多根据合作伙伴和消费者需求推进,补栏计划也一直在有序推进。

在他看来,全产业链模式的优势主要体现在品质、供应和成本三个方面。黄天鹅从种鸡、饲料到养殖、加工做全链路管控,自有基地加深度协同的养殖体系,也能避免周期波动带来的产销计划紊乱;自有饲料工厂和集中采购,则能在原料价格高企时平抑部分成本,让客户价格不至于大起大落。

这也是品牌蛋企和中小企业之间的差异。虽然同样要面对饲料、人工等成本费用,但自有供应链会减轻外部现货价格短期波动带来的直接冲击。它们需要维护长期价格体系,也更少用短期行情来调整终端价格。

即食鸡蛋产品的传导速度则更慢。

领鲜食品主要做溏心蛋等即食鸡蛋产品。其CEO周夏彪告诉红餐供应链指南,公司不做大规模库存,产品属于短保冷藏,保质期一般在1-2个月。原料蛋价格上涨后,加工端很快要重新计算成本,但其产品主要面向B端客户,报价方式和普通鲜蛋不同,不能每天跟着行情调整。

而沿着这条链条往上游看,终端只是更晚感受到价格变化的地方。真正让鸡蛋涨价的原因,还是得回到反复拉扯的鸡周期。

去年少补的鸡,变成今年少供的蛋

2025年,蛋鸡养殖户的日子并不好过。

据农业农村部畜牧兽医局数据,2025年全年鸡蛋集贸市场均价为9.25元/公斤,较2024年下降13.55%,全年有11个月处于亏损状态。国家蛋鸡产业技术体系首席科学家张军民也在公开分析中提到,持续亏损下,养殖场户加快淘汰蛋鸡,补栏意愿明显降低。

亏损不会立刻反映到消费者手里的鸡蛋价格上,它会先改变养殖户的产能决策。

周夏彪长期和上游鸡场打交道。他告诉红餐供应链指南,去年很多鸡场因为单价低、亏损时间长,选择卖鸡观望,有些鸡场减少了30万、50万只鸡。到了今年需要供货时,部分原有合作鸡场直接表示“鸡没上来,鸡蛋也衔接不上”。

蛋鸡行业的麻烦在于,产能不会随着价格上涨立刻恢复。鸡苗补上去以后,还需要100多天才能进入产蛋阶段。去年底和今年初减少的补栏,会在几个月后表现为供给缺口。

吉蛋堂首席技术官袁正东给出的判断更具体。他表示,去年8-10月份,在产蛋鸡存栏还维持在13.5亿只以上,到今年4月已经降到不到13亿只,5月大约为12.8亿只。

另一组更关键的数据出现在补栏端:2025年3月单月补栏量约9500万只,之后一路回落,到今年1月降至6800多万只,2月又因春节影响又降到4300万只左右。6月进入高产阶段的蛋鸡,基本对应今年年初补栏的鸡。

蛋的供应由蛋鸡存栏数量和生产性能共同决定,存栏减少以后,年初又补得少,几个月后市场可供鸡蛋的基础盘就会直接断层。

这解释了为什么涨价会在5月、6月变得更明显。鸡蛋是刚需农产品,消费量不会因为短期涨价迅速下降;供给少几个百分点,价格反应往往会更剧烈。鲜蛋又很难长期储存,流通链条更多随行就市,前端产量一旦接不上,批发和采购端很快就会反映出来。

产蛋性能也在这个阶段受到影响。4月底后,国内陆续进入高温季节,高温会影响鸡群采食量和产蛋效率。在袁正东看来,供应端同时出现了数量下降、生产性能下降、鸡群结构老化三重变化。

高温和节日备货又把这个缺口放大了。

端午节前,学校、食品企业和终端渠道都有备货需求。国家统计局在5月CPI解读中也提到,阶段性供给偏紧、夏季高温产蛋率下降、端午节前集中备货等因素,推动5月鸡蛋价格上涨6.1%。

渠道端已经感受到这种变化。区芳霞直言,前期冷库蛋基本消化完,老鸡淘汰后新鸡产蛋量没有跟上;端午节需求、食品企业中秋月饼订单提前预订,又加剧了供不应求。

把这轮行情放回蛋鸡周期里看,它并不算特殊。

袁正东认为,这轮价格上涨仍然属于正常生产经营里的周期波动,核心取决于产能结构和鸡群结构:新增产蛋母鸡有多少,下架老母鸡有多少,最终决定市场供应是增是减。

袁正东对后续的判断没有特别激进。他提到,今年5-6月份,进雏数量已经恢复到8500万、8600万只,未来4到5个月后,产能会逐步回到更正常的状态。随着端午备货结束,价格继续快速上涨的势头可能会缓和,甚至不排除蛋价会出现阶段性回调。

区芳霞和周夏彪的判断一致,下半年鸡蛋价格可能维持在当前水平附近,存在小幅回调空间,但变化不会太大,中秋前后仍可能是一个高位节点,波动大概率也会持续到节后。

涨价了,但赚钱这件事没那么简单

鸡蛋价格涨起来后,养殖端的账还是会小有改善。

去年亏损时,蛋鸡养殖户面对的是卖一斤亏一斤。今年价格起来后,只要手里还有处在产蛋期的鸡,收入会比去年好很多。袁正东也提到,鸡蛋涨价后,生产企业的日子肯定会好过一点。

不过,田敏认为,把蛋价上涨直接理解成养殖企业赚钱,并不完全准确,“这轮涨价本质上是前期行业深度亏损后的修复性反弹,当前饲料成本仍在高位,环保和生物安全投入也在持续增加。对全产业链企业而言,利润还要继续投入产品技术研发、品牌建设和供应链升级”。

事实上,对于前面那轮低价周期里,已经提前淘汰老鸡、减少补栏的养殖户来说,即便看到价格起来,也很难立刻增加供应。鸡苗补上去以后还需要时间,产能恢复追不上行情变化。

涨价进入渠道端后,利润却很难跟着蛋价一起走高。

佛山蛋仓的B端报价已经基本随市场行情同步上调,零售端前期还能消化一部分涨幅,目前也开始跟涨。但负责人给出的利润判断并不乐观,今年能“不亏就好了”。

渠道商能涨价,不代表利润同步变厚。鸡蛋价格上行后,上游拿货成本先涨,单箱货值变高,资金占用也会变大。鲜蛋库存周期又短,价格每天变化,进货价和出货价之间留给渠道商的操作空间并不大。价格上涨还会压缩客户采购量,区芳霞也提到,近期采购量和销量都有所收缩。

加工企业的压力更直接。

原料价格进入成本端很快,进入售价端要慢得多。周夏彪提到,鸡蛋原料在领鲜整体成本中大概占50%-60%,这轮涨价后,领鲜原料端成本已经上涨10%-30%。

这部分成本目前没有完全传导到客户那里。

领鲜给客户多采用全年锁价,价格定下来后,很难像普通鲜蛋一样每天跟着行情调。周夏彪表示,目前这部分变化还在公司内部消化,如果后续鲜蛋价格继续上涨,才会考虑调整下游售价。

事实上,这类加工产品的定价本来就不只对应一枚鲜蛋。原料的筛选、加工、品控检测和渠道等费用都会进入最终定价,客户同样在为破损率控制、食品安全和出品稳定性付费。也正因为价格结构更复杂,这类产品的调价节奏通常不会完全跟随鲜蛋行情。

值得注意的是,鸡蛋进入高价周期后,下游客户的采购逻辑也在变化。

一个反直觉的变化是,周夏彪提到,鸡蛋价格越高,来咨询即食鸡蛋的客户反而更多了。

原因并不复杂,鲜鸡蛋价格已经上涨,即食鸡蛋虽然原本终端价格相较更高,但因为调价空间更小,两者之间的价差就被压缩了。再加上即食鸡蛋在破损率保障和食品安全上更稳定,餐饮客户重新计算成本后,会发现成品蛋的相对性价比变高了。

区芳霞也观察到类似变化。价格普遍上涨后,下游客户在同样价格区间里,会更倾向于选择品质更稳定的鸡蛋,因为品质稳定可以减少损耗。

而在田敏看来,高价周期里,下游客户最担心的还是断供和产品安全出问题,因此合作方的稳定供货能力和品质安全保障被提到更高优先级,价格敏感度反而阶段性下降。越来越多餐饮和零售客户开始主动寻求与品牌化、全产业链企业深度绑定,用长期协议锁定产能和标准。

短期的价格波动未必会立刻改写下游客户的采购结构,但至少会让它们重新审视过去被低价覆盖掉的成本。

周期来过,账不会一笔勾销

这轮涨价之后,鸡蛋价格不会一直停在高位。随着新一批蛋鸡进入产蛋高峰,后续价格仍有回落空间。

但价格回落以后,行业要面对的问题不会消失。

袁正东认为,鸡蛋行业的周期波动仍会存在,但企业抵抗周期的能力会分层。一些已经具备规模化、品牌化的企业通常有更稳定的生产标准、销售渠道和终端价格体系,受批发市场短期波动的影响相对小。去年低价周期里,部分头部品牌蛋企仍能保持盈利,也和这一点有关。

同时他坦言,过去行业里中小养殖户占比较高,行情低迷时容易集中淘汰,行情上涨后又容易集中补栏,市场波动也会被放大。随着大中型企业占比提升,企业更倾向于维持相对均衡的生产节奏,价格大起大落的幅度也会相对收窄。

田敏也认为,这轮涨价会进一步推动鸡蛋行业向品牌化、规模化方向发展。在他看来,每一次行情波动都在提醒行业,粗放式经营的风险很高。消费者在蛋价高的时候,会更倾向于选择安全、品质有保障、值得信赖的品牌;下游餐饮和零售伙伴,也会更愿意和有规模、有稳定供应能力的企业深度合作。

鸡蛋仍然是周期性很强的农产品,价格涨跌不会消失。行业能做的,是减少对短期行情的过度反应。

养殖端保持相对均衡的生产节奏,企业通过规模化、品牌化、标准化提升供应稳定性,渠道端和终端之间建立更长期的价格关系,产业链面对下一轮周期时冲击才会变小。

鸡蛋涨价只是一个入口,真正被拉开的,是不同企业穿越周期的能力。

注:文/专注餐饮供应链的,文章来源:餐饮供应链指南(公众号ID:MzA4MDg2NjI4Mw==),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:餐饮供应链指南

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0