广告
加载中

阿里为什么要“抢”朴朴?

伯虎团队 2026-06-18 19:41
伯虎团队 2026/06/18 19:41

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心梳理了即时零售行业并购潮下阿里拟收购朴朴的行业事件,干货信息如下

1. 核心事件进展:当前即时零售已经开启并购潮,美团以约49.8亿元收购叮咚买菜后,国内仅剩的头部前置仓生鲜平台朴朴传出被三巨头竞购消息,目前阿里拟以约101.5亿元人民币报价收购朴朴,双方暂未正面回应。

2. 朴朴核心优势:朴朴2024年首次实现年度盈利,年营收约300亿元,深耕华南下沉市场,福州大本营渗透率达70%;履约费用率比行业平均低3成以上,损耗率3.5%远低于行业平均5%-8%,福建直采率超80%,自有品牌SKU超750个,本地化优势明显。

3. 阿里收购核心逻辑:补自身华南自营生鲜基础设施短板,整合即时零售业务冲击行业第一,同时获得AI落地所需的高频消费场景与数据资产。

本文披露了即时零售生鲜赛道的最新发展动态,能给品牌商布局业务、把握趋势提供明确参考

1. 行业格局与消费趋势:2025年国内即时零售市场规模已达9714亿元,阿里、美团各占约45%份额,行业已经进入终局竞争阶段,竞争从烧钱补贴转向运营效率比拼,本地化供应链、低成本履约是核心壁垒,华南下沉市场消费者对即时生鲜的需求旺盛。

2. 渠道布局机会:阿里收购朴朴后,将整合淘宝闪购、盒马等即时零售业务,形成朴朴主攻中低端、盒马拉高定位的华南市场布局,品牌商可提前对接阿里系即时零售渠道,抢占华南下沉市场的增量空间。

3. 产品研发方向:朴朴的发展说明市场认可本地化生鲜直供、高性价比自有产品,品牌商可围绕本地化特色产品、渠道定制自有产品方向发力研发。

本文梳理了即时零售赛道的最新变化,能给生鲜零售卖家明确机会、风险与可学习经验

1. 行业整体变化:即时零售已经进入并购整合的终局阶段,头部玩家占据近九成市场份额,中小玩家的独立生存空间被不断压缩,优质区域零售资产成为巨头争夺的核心目标。

2. 机会提示:华南下沉即时零售市场是接下来的核心增量战场,需求旺盛,本地零售卖家可对接头部平台生态,依托巨头的流量、履约体系获得增长机会。

3. 风险提示:未来行业比拼运营效率与成本控制,无法优化供应链损耗、履约成本的卖家很难在耐力赛中存活;同时行业整合阶段,要关注巨头竞争带来的市场波动,提前做好应对。

4. 可学习经验:朴朴大前置仓模式、本地化深耕带来的成本控制经验,值得零售卖家参考学习。

本文披露了生鲜即时零售赛道的最新动态,给生鲜生产加工工厂指明了商业机会与升级方向

1. 产品生产需求变化:当前即时零售赛道越来越看重本地化、高性价比的生鲜产品,头部平台朴朴直采率超过80%,还在大力发展自有品牌,说明工厂对接平台直采、为平台开发定制化自有品牌产品的需求正在大幅提升。

2. 商业合作机会:阿里收购朴朴完成业务整合后,会大力拓展华南即时零售市场,对本地化生鲜产品的供给需求会明显增长,深耕华南区域的生鲜生产加工工厂,可以获得更多直采合作机会,省去中间渠道环节,提升自身利润空间。

3. 数字化转型启示:即时零售会积累大量真实高频的消费数据,工厂对接头部平台后,可以依托这些消费数据优化生产计划与产品设计,按需生产降低自身库存损耗,推进数字化生产转型,提升整体运营效率。

本文梳理了即时零售行业的最新发展趋势和客户核心痛点,能给即时零售相关服务商指明业务方向

1. 行业发展趋势:即时零售已经结束烧钱扩张的阶段,进入比拼运营效率的整合期,行业集中度快速提升,2025年市场规模接近万亿,阿里、美团双雄格局已经形成,接下来头部玩家会加速补全区域短板、布局AI相关基础设施。

2. 客户核心痛点:当前头部平台的核心痛点一是补全区域市场的仓网、供应链基础设施,二是获取更多真实高频的消费数据支撑AI商业落地,三是进一步降低履约成本与商品损耗,提升整体运营效率。

3. 业务机会:服务商可以围绕头部平台的上述需求,开发区域生鲜供应链数字化管理、前置仓运营效率优化、AI场景落地配套等相关解决方案,同时抓住华南市场扩张的红利,拓展新客户。

本文披露了即时零售头部平台竞争的最新动向,对布局即时零售的平台有重要参考价值

1. 行业核心需求:当前即时零售平台的核心需求是补全区域市场短板,获取优质本地化运营资产,积累高频消费数据,夯实AI落地的场景基础,同时整合分散业务统一用户心智,提升整体竞争力。

2. 运营管理参考:朴朴深耕区域市场、采用大前置仓模式的策略,实现了比行业更低的履约成本与损耗,说明区域深耕、打磨运营效率比盲目扩张更有价值,平台可参考其成本控制方法优化自身前置仓布局。

3. 风险规避要点:连续收购同赛道头部资产可能引发垄断争议,平台整合扩张过程中需要关注合规风险;另外大规模烧钱收购会带来较大资金压力,平台需要平衡长期价值与短期投入,避免出现资金风险。

本文梳理了即时零售行业最新的并购动向与竞争格局,给零售产业研究者提供了丰富的新动向与研究素材

1. 产业最新动向:即时零售行业已经进入并购整合的终局阶段,行业从分散竞争走向头部集中,2025年市场规模达到9714亿元,阿里、美团双雄割据的格局已经形成,行业竞争逻辑从早期的烧钱补贴争夺份额,转向运营效率比拼和AI时代基础设施布局。

2. 商业模式新变化:阿里正在推动即时零售业务的整合,将原本分散的盒马、天猫超市、淘宝闪购等业务统一整合,形成以淘宝闪购为入口的全品类即时零售服务闭环,这是巨头整合即时零售业务的全新尝试,具备较高研究价值。

3. 值得研究的新问题:本次并购潮体现出本地化运营资产和消费数据的价值大幅提升,同时巨头将即时零售作为AI落地的核心高频场景,烧钱布局即时零售本质是为AI构建基础设施,这种新的竞争逻辑值得深入研究。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article breaks down Alibaba's rumored acquisition of Pupu against the backdrop of the recent wave of mergers and acquisitions sweeping China's instant retail industry, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Core event update: After Meituan acquired Dingdong Maicai for approximately RMB 4.98 billion, the merger wave has officially kicked off for China's instant retail sector. Pupu, the last remaining leading front-center fresh grocery platform, has recently been reported to be a target of bidding by three tech giants. Alibaba has tabled an acquisition offer of around RMB 10.15 billion for Pupu, though neither party has issued an official confirmation yet.

2. Pupu's core strengths: Pupu turned its first annual profit in 2024, with annual revenue hitting roughly RMB 30 billion. It has deep roots in lower-tier markets in South China, boasting a 70% penetration rate in its home base Fuzhou. Its fulfillment cost ratio is more than 30% lower than the industry average, and its product shrinkage rate stands at 3.5%, far below the industry average of 5% to 8%. Over 80% of its products are sourced directly from Fujian producers, it has more than 750 SKUs under private labels, giving it strong local competitive advantages.

3. Alibaba's core logic for the acquisition: The deal would allow Alibaba to fix gaps in its self-operated fresh grocery infrastructure in South China, integrate its instant retail business to challenge for the top spot in the industry, and gain high-frequency consumption scenarios and data assets needed for AI commercialization.

This article outlines the latest developments in the fresh grocery segment of instant retail, providing clear reference for brands to plan their channel strategies and track industry trends:

1. Industry landscape and consumption trends: China's instant retail market is projected to reach RMB 971.4 billion in size by 2025, with Alibaba and Meituan each holding roughly 45% market share. The industry has entered the endgame of competition, where the focus has shifted from subsidy-fueled expansion to operational efficiency. Localized supply chains and low-cost fulfillment have emerged as core barriers to entry, and demand for instant fresh grocery is booming in lower-tier South China markets.

2. Channel layout opportunities: After acquiring Pupu, Alibaba will integrate its existing instant retail assets including Taobao Flash Purchase and Hema, forming a tiered layout in South China where Pupu targets the mid-low price segment and Hema caters to the premium market. Brands can proactively connect with Alibaba's instant retail ecosystem to capture incremental growth in lower-tier South China markets.

3. Product R&D directions: Pupu's success proves that the market favors localized direct-sourced fresh produce and high-value-for-money private label products. Brands can prioritize R&D of localized specialty products and channel-exclusive private label offerings.

This article sorts out the latest shifts in the instant retail track, clarifying opportunities, risks and actionable takeaways for fresh grocery retail sellers:

1. Overall industry shifts: Instant retail has entered the endgame of merger and integration, with leading players controlling nearly 90% of the market share. The independent living space for small and medium-sized players is steadily shrinking, and high-quality regional retail assets have become the core target of giant players' acquisitions.

2. Opportunity alerts: Lower-tier South China markets will be the core incremental battlefield for instant retail going forward, with booming local demand. Local retail sellers can partner with leading platform ecosystems to access giants' traffic and fulfillment networks and drive growth.

3. Risk alerts: Going forward, competition will center on operational efficiency and cost control. Sellers that cannot reduce supply chain shrinkage and cut fulfillment costs are unlikely to survive in this endurance race. During the industry integration phase, sellers should also prepare in advance for market volatility brought by giant platform competition.

4. Actionable takeaways: Pupu's cost control experience gained through its large front-center warehouse model and deep localized penetration offers a valuable reference for retail sellers.

This article discloses the latest dynamics of the fresh grocery instant retail track, pointing out business opportunities and upgrade directions for fresh produce processing factories:

1. Shifts in product demand: The instant retail industry is increasingly prioritizing localized, high-value-for-money fresh products. Leading platform Pupu sources over 80% of its products directly from producers, and is aggressively expanding its private label portfolio, indicating that demand for direct factory-platform sourcing and customized private label product development has risen sharply.

2. Business cooperation opportunities: After Alibaba completes the acquisition of Pupu and integrates its business, it will aggressively expand the South China instant retail market, driving a notable increase in demand for localized fresh produce supply. Fresh produce processing factories with deep roots in South China will gain more direct sourcing cooperation opportunities, eliminating middleman links and boosting profit margins.

3. Insights for digital transformation: Instant retail platforms accumulate large volumes of real high-frequency consumption data. After partnering with leading platforms, factories can leverage this data to optimize production planning and product design, adopt make-to-order production to reduce inventory shrinkage, advance digital production transformation, and improve overall operational efficiency.

This article sorts out the latest development trends and core customer pain points in the instant retail industry, pointing out clear business directions for instant retail-related service providers:

1. Industry development trends: Instant retail has exited the phase of subsidy-fueled expansion and entered an integration phase focused on operational efficiency competition, with industry concentration rising rapidly. The market will approach RMB 1 trillion in size by 2025, and a duopoly of Alibaba and Meituan has already formed. Going forward, leading players will accelerate efforts to fill regional gaps and build out AI-related infrastructure.

2. Core customer pain points: Leading platforms currently face three core pain points: first, the need to complete the construction of warehouse networks and supply chain infrastructure in underpenetrated regional markets; second, the need to obtain more real high-frequency consumption data to support AI commercialization; and third, the need to further cut fulfillment costs and product shrinkage to improve overall operational efficiency.

3. Business opportunities: Service providers can develop solutions aligned with these needs, including digital management for regional fresh supply chains, front-center warehouse operational efficiency optimization, and supporting solutions for AI scenario commercialization. They can also capitalize on the expansion boom in South China to acquire new clients.

This article discloses the latest competitive dynamics among leading instant retail platforms, offering important reference value for platforms布局ing the instant retail space:

1. Core industry demand: The core demands for current instant retail platforms are filling gaps in regional market coverage, acquiring high-quality localized operational assets, accumulating high-frequency consumption data to build the scenario foundation for AI commercialization, integrating fragmented businesses to unify user perception, and improving overall competitiveness.

2. Operational management reference: Pupu's strategy of deep penetration in regional markets with a large front-center warehouse model has delivered lower fulfillment costs and product shrinkage than the industry average, proving that deep regional focus and operational efficiency refinement deliver more value than blind expansion. Platforms can reference Pupu's cost control methods to optimize their own front-center warehouse布局.

3. Risk mitigation notes: Sequential acquisitions of leading assets in the same sector may trigger monopoly scrutiny, so platforms need to pay close attention to compliance risks during integration and expansion. In addition, large-scale acquisition spending creates significant capital pressure, so platforms need to balance long-term value and short-term investment to avoid liquidity risks.

This article sorts out the latest M&A trends and competitive landscape of the instant retail industry, providing rich new insights and research material for retail industry researchers:

1. Latest industry developments: The instant retail industry has entered the endgame of M&A integration, shifting from fragmented competition to head-of-market concentration. The market will reach RMB 971.4 billion in size by 2025, and a duopoly of Alibaba and Meituan has already formed. The core competitive logic has shifted from early subsidy-fueled market share competition to operational efficiency competition and infrastructure布局 for the AI era.

2. New changes in business models: Alibaba is pushing forward the integration of its scattered instant retail businesses including Hema, Tmall Supermarket and Taobao Flash Purchase, forming a closed-loop full-category instant retail service with Taobao Flash Purchase as the unified entry point. This is a new attempt by a giant tech company to integrate instant retail assets, and carries high research value.

3. New research questions worth exploring: The current M&A wave shows that the value of localized operational assets and consumer data has increased significantly. At the same time, giants are positioning instant retail as a core high-frequency scenario for AI commercialization, and their heavy investment in instant retail is essentially building infrastructure for AI. This new competitive logic warrants in-depth research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

来源 | 伯虎财经(bohuFN)

作者 | 楷楷

即时零售行业的“并购潮”已然开启。

今年2月,美团以7.17亿美元(约人民币49.8亿元)收购叮咚买菜;前段时间,另一家生鲜巨头朴朴超市,也传出被美团、京东和阿里三巨头竞购的消息。

目前,美团、京东、阿里均未做出回应,但据自媒体“字母榜”报道,已有接近美团和京东的相关人士否认参与竞购。

没想到的是,这事在近日迎来了新动向。彭博社报道称,阿里拟以15亿美元(约人民币101.5亿元)的报价收购朴朴,不过,阿里和朴朴均尚未正面回应。

阿里藏在“竞购”背后

今年5月,关于阿里、京东、美团三家巨头竞购朴朴的消息,开始在资本市场流传。

消息越传越细,包括阿里已经派驻审计入驻朴朴;今日资本徐新代表京东与朴朴洽谈;美团也在参与出价。

在传闻中,朴朴的估值区间达到20亿-50亿美元,较叮咚收购案的估值高出不少。当然,传闻只是传闻,但朴朴比叮咚“更贵”,也在意料之内。

毕竟,两者的出售逻辑有相似之处,也有不同。

叮咚买菜创立于2017年,到2024年才首次实现全年GAAP标准下盈利,2019-2023年累计亏损超120亿元,2024-2025年,其归母净利润分别为2.95亿元和2.22亿元。

成立于2016年的朴朴尚未上市,其经营数据由第三方媒体披露,据悉其也是在2024年首次实现年度盈利,全年营收约300亿元,收入规模略胜叮咚一筹。

不过,生鲜电商本就是一门利润微薄的生意,参考盒马2025财年的净利率为2.5%,叮咚2025年净利率更仅有1.2%,朴朴和叮咚收入体量相当,两者的利润差距应该不会很大。

因此,朴朴虽然“不缺钱”,但跟叮咚一样,还称不上“很滋润”。因此,站在被巨头围剿的市场中央,朴朴也有自己的压力。

在终局到来之前,朴朴自然希望为自己寻找多一个可能性。但有意思的是,在经营情况差不多的情况下,朴朴的估值却比叮咚高出不少。

这要归因于朴朴在华南市场更高的渗透率,谁想拿下华南市场,都绕不开朴朴。

朴朴自诞生之初,就选择跟每日优鲜、叮咚买菜进行错位竞争,其没有主攻一线城市,而是深耕福州、厦门等区域城市,扎根华南下沉市场,其在福州大本营的渗透率高达70%。

再加上叮咚被美团拿下后,朴朴就成了即时零售市场上仅剩的“稀缺资产”,这也给了它更多跟潜在买家博弈的底气。

京东被外界认为是最该买的那一位。

目前,达达的履约能力和仓网布局明显落后于美团和淘宝闪购,京东拿下朴朴,不仅能补全基础设施的短板,还能帮助基本盘在北方市场的京东攻向南方市场。

据《商业观察家》报道,京东似乎也有意收购叮咚,但最终还是由美团拿下。

京东有自己的犹豫,在今年3月,京东CEO许冉透露2026年外卖投入将有所降低。而在更早之前,刘强东曾不止一次强调,供应链才是京东的终极战场。

从这一点来看,京东或无意在激烈的生鲜赛道争夺一个“未知的第三”,毕竟,一旦拿下朴朴,京东就要重兵进驻华南区域,这将会是新一轮的“烧钱竞赛”。

至于美团,概率则更小。

据《蓝鲸新闻》估算,美团旗下小象超市与叮咚买菜的组合,在前置仓赛道的市占率已接近50%,再收购朴朴,或许会引发垄断争议。

此外,小象超市在华南区域已有一定的基础,其收购朴朴只是锦上添花,而非雪中送炭。美团未必要一口气连续拿下叮咚和朴朴。

藏在两者之间,始终没有正面回应的阿里,反而成了最有可能拿下朴朴的那一个。

为什么要拿下朴朴?

最表面的原因,是进攻与防守。

阿里拿下朴朴之后,将能进一步完善其在履约、仓网和供应链等方面的短板,增强整个阿里系在生鲜电商领域的实力。

从这一点来看,朴朴确实是一个优秀的标的。

在供应链方面,在福建农协渠道,朴朴的直采率超过80%,自有品牌SKU超750个,有着其他竞争对手难以在短期内快速复制的本地化优势。

在仓网和履约效率方面,截至2025年,朴朴在全国9个城市部署了400多个大型前置仓。

而且,区别于行业内普遍的小仓模式,朴朴均采用800-1000平方米的大型前置仓,SKU数量达6000-8000个,仓网数量更少,却能实现更稳定的供给。

据第三方报道,朴朴的履约费用率控制在17.5%以内,作为参考,每日优鲜的履约费用率最低约为25%左右;叮咚买菜近年则稳定在21%-23%。

履约费用率反映的是仓储、分拣、打包、配送等刚性成本占每单收入的比例,在保证骑手效率、产品质量的前提下,这个指标越低,越能反映出平台控制成本的能力。

《观网财经》援引零售分析人士数据称,朴朴的损耗率约为3.5%(行业平均为5%-8%);另外,长江证券研报也提到,朴朴近年毛利率逐年上升,且履约成本低于行业平均水平3成以上。

与之相反,阿里在华南市场缺少自营生鲜的基础设施,如果盒马系想要在华南市场再进一步,朴朴的本地生鲜供应链,密集的仓网、高频的订单量,都能成为盒马的跳板。

不仅如此,朴朴和盒马之间还能形成“朴朴主攻中低端,盒马拉高天花板”的生鲜零售布局,在华南市场筑起一道更坚固的战略防线。

对华南市场发起进攻是第一步,防御美团则是第二步。

据悉,美团小象超市计划在2026年新开约800个前置仓,目前,其正从华南三四线城市向朴朴的外围地带加速渗透,拿下朴朴,就相当于暂时挡住了美团深化华南市场的步伐。

然而,阿里更深入的意图,则藏在近期的组织变革之中。

今年5月,盒马CEO严筱磊的汇报线从吴泽明调整到了蒋凡。需要注意的是,盒马自2015年成立至今,一直都是一个相对独立的业务。

然而,以外卖大战为引子,阿里开始把分散在各处的业务线整合在一起。去年6月,阿里宣布将饿了么、飞猪合并入阿里中国电商事业群,由中国电商事业群CEO蒋凡统管。

据《晚点LatePost》报道,阿里正推动将盒马、天猫超市、淘宝闪购、医药等和即时零售高度相关的业务的品牌和用户心智统一收归到淘宝闪购之下。

过去,阿里对即时零售的态度是“参与竞争”,如今,阿里则明确要拿下“即时零售市场绝对第一”,态度变了,动作自然也变了。

过去一年,阿里以淘宝闪购为入口,形成了“全品类供应+30分钟配送+本地生活服务”的服务闭环,即时零售已成为阿里电商板块最大的增长引擎。

为了进一步托举即时零售生态,阿里自然要积累更多筹码。

这笔交易值不值得?

更关键的是,即时零售的竞争已经进入拐点。

一方面,外卖补贴大战已经退潮,即时零售竞赛将从“烧钱战”转为“耐力赛”,比拼的是各平台的运营效率——谁的供应链更高效、谁的履约成本更低,谁就能建立更深厚的壁垒。

这种基础设施不是靠资本堆砌就能简单复制的,也并非数量越多越好,而是每一城有每一城的数据,需要日复一日的运营打磨和用户沉淀,才能实现规模平衡,跑通盈利模型。

因此,阿里将要买下的不仅仅是朴朴的物理网仓,还是高频、真实的消费数据,这也是更高价值的数据资产。

另一方面,阿里的AI战略也跟其零售生态紧密相连。阿里董事长蔡崇信近期表示,“烧钱做即时零售不是为了短期盈利,而是为了构建AI时代的基础设施:数据、场景、用户心智。”

今年以来,阿里不断加速AI Agent的商业落地:千问App接入支付宝、淘宝闪购、飞猪等业务,实现“一句话办事”;在B端,悟空以企业级AI原生工作平台形态亮相。

阿里想要拿下AI Agent时代的入场券,而即时零售则是AI最容易介入的真实场景——决策简单、需求高频,也更接近消费者的生活现场。

从这个角度来看,阿里有充分的理由买下朴朴,但这笔交易该如何定价,才算是“值得”。

一个有意思的细节是,据外媒报道,大润发的运营方高鑫零售曾提议以6亿美元收购朴朴。

高鑫零售作为阿里的新零售试验场之一,曾被阿里先后斥资超?500亿港元?收入囊中。不过,阿里已在2025年初以最高约131港元的价格,出售其持有的高鑫零售全部股份。

曾经的关联公司变成竞购对手,阿里传闻中的收购价格甚至比高鑫零售还高出一倍多,这也反映出的是,零售市场已经进入贴身肉搏的“决赛圈”。

高鑫希望在大润发的渠道和供应链基础上,补全“最后一公里”能力,拿下即时零售赛道的“入场券”;阿里以更高价格截胡,除了补强自身之外,恐怕也有堵住对手入局的考量。

毕竟,在即时零售这个赛道上,时间的价值有时候大于金钱。

阿里、美团、京东,以及其他潜在的买家,都有各自买下朴朴的理由。

最终,朴朴是否值20亿-50亿美元并没有那么重要——重要的是,大家想要买下的“时间”和“未来”,到底值多少。

根据商务部研究院数据,2025年,全国即时零售市场规模为9714亿元???,阿里和美团的份额差不多都在45%左右。

所有玩家都在加速行动,而势均力敌的竞争,也是市场最血腥的阶段。

最终朴朴花落谁家,还需要等待谜底,但到那时候,必定会有一个巨头会多出一张别人没有的底牌。

注:文/伯虎团队,文章来源:伯虎财经(公众号ID:bohuFN),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:伯虎财经

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0